A Canadian Evidence-Based Guideline for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma: Joint Consensus of the Lymphoma Canada Scientific Advisory Board

Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT may contribute to the determination of initial treatment strategy for newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND

"Watch-and-wait" approach is an important management option in asymptomatic follicular lymphoma (FL) patients with low tumor burden. Since most FL lesions are FDG-avid, we wonder if 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline can help to better choose the patients who can benefit from early chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed FL patients treated with either watch-and-wait approach or chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients received chemotherapy as initial treatment had higher Ann Arbor stage, higher incidence of extranodal involvement and bulky disease, more involved lymph nodes larger than 3 cm, and higher SUVmax, MTV, and TLG than those managed with watch-and-wait approach (p < 0.05). The median PFS and TTNT in patients received chemotherapy and under watch-and-wait did not show significant difference, however patients with MTV<111.66 mL or TLG<141.50 SUVbw*mL had significantly longer PFS and TTNT than those patients with MTV≥111.66 mL or TLG≥141.50 SUVbw*mL (p < 0.05). Further analysis revealed that for patients with TLG≥141.50 SUVbw*mL or MTV≥111.66 mL, those who received chemotherapy as initial treatment had a significantly longer PFS and TTNT than those managed with initial watch-and-wait approach (p < 0.05). However, for patients with MTV<111.66 mL or TLG<141.50 SUVbw*mL in baseline PET/CT, there was no significant difference in PFS or TTNT between patients who received chemotherapy and those under watch-and-wait.

CONCLUSION

Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT may provide prognostic value and help to improve the decision-making of initial treatment plans for newly diagnosed FL patients.

Indolent lymphoma care delivery and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada

The treatment pattern and outcomes in patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma treated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period compared to the prepandemic period are unclear. This was a retrospective population-based study using administrative databases in Ontario, Canada (follow-up to 31 March 2022). The primary outcome was treatment pattern; secondary outcomes were death, toxicities, healthcare utilization (emergency department [ED] visit, hospitalization) and SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) from Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations. We identified 4143 patients (1079 pandemic, 3064 prepandemic), with a median age of 69 years. In both time periods, bendamustine (B) + rituximab (BR) was the most frequently prescribed regimen. During the pandemic, fewer patients received R maintenance or completed the full 2-year course (aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, p = 0.001). Patients treated during the pandemic had less healthcare utilization (ED visit aHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68, 0.88, p < 0.0001; hospitalization aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94, p = 0.0067) and complications (infection aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.82, p < 0.0001; febrile neutropenia aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.94, p = 0.020), with no difference in death. Independent of vaccination, active rituximab use was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 complications. Despite similar front-line regimen use, healthcare utilization and admissions for infection were less in the pandemic cohort.

Cancer Care by Committee to be Superseded by Personal Physician-Patient Partnership Informed by Artificial Intelligence

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) have become the reference standard of cancer management, founded upon randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence-based guidelines. The inordinate delays inherent in awaiting formal regulatory agency approvals of novel therapeutic agents, and the rigidities and nongeneralizability of this regimented approach, often deny cancer patients timely access to effective innovative treatment. Reluctance of MTBs to accept theranostic care of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer resulted in decades of delay in the incorporation of 177Lu-octreotate and 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) into routine clinical oncology practice. Recent developments in immunotherapy and molecular targeted precision therapy, based on N-of-One individual multifactorial genome analyses, have greatly increased the complexity of decision-making. Burgeoning specialist workload and tight time frames now threaten to overwhelm the logistically, and emotionally, demanding MTB system. It is hypothesized that the advent of advanced artificial intelligence technology and Chatbot natural language algorithms will shift the cancer care paradigm from a MTB management model toward a personal physician-patient shared-care partnership for real-world practice of precision individualized holistic oncology.

Genetic subdivisions of follicular lymphoma defined by distinct coding and noncoding mutation patterns

Follicular lymphoma (FL) accounts for ∼20% of all new lymphoma cases. Increases in cytological grade are a feature of the clinical progression of this malignancy, and eventual histologic transformation (HT) to the aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) occurs in up to 15% of patients. Clinical or genetic features to predict the risk and timing of HT have not been described comprehensively. In this study, we analyzed whole-genome sequencing data from 423 patients to compare the protein coding and noncoding mutation landscapes of untransformed FL, transformed FL, and de novo DLBCL. This revealed 2 genetically distinct subgroups of FL, which we have named DLBCL-like (dFL) and constrained FL (cFL). Each subgroup has distinguishing mutational patterns, aberrant somatic hypermutation rates, and biological and clinical characteristics. We implemented a machine learning-derived classification approach to stratify patients with FL into cFL and dFL subgroups based on their genomic features. Using separate validation cohorts, we demonstrate that cFL status, whether assigned with this full classifier or a single-gene approximation, is associated with a reduced rate of HT. This implies distinct biological features of cFL that constrain its evolution, and we highlight the potential for this classification to predict HT from genetic features present at diagnosis.

Estimating the Burden of Illness of Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Many patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) relapse after first-line chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To examine healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost, treatment patterns, progression, and survival of patients with FL and MZL who relapse after first-line treatment, in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective, administrative data study identified patients with relapsed FL and MZL (1 January 2005-31 December 2018). Patients were followed for up to three years post relapse to assess HCRU, healthcare costs, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS), stratified by first- and second-line treatment.

RESULTS

The study identified 285 FL and 68 MZL cases who relapsed after first-line treatment. Average duration of first-line treatment was 12.4 and 13.4 months for FL and MZL patients, respectively. Drug (35.9%) and cancer clinic costs (28.1%) were major contributors to higher costs in year 1. Three-year OS was 83.9% after FL and 74.2% after MZL relapse. No statistically significant differences were observed in TTNT and OS between patients with FL who received R-CHOP/R-CVP/BR in the first line only versus both the first- and second- line. A total of 31% of FL and 34% of MZL patients progressed to third-line treatment within three years of initial relapse.

CONCLUSION

Relapsing and remitting nature of FL and MZL in a subset of patients results in substantial burden to patients and the healthcare system.

Managing Follicular Lymphoma in the Elderly Population

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most commonly diagnosed types of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The median age of diagnosis for FL is 65 years old. Although the median life expectancy after diagnosis is approximately 10 years, the incurable disease has a high risk of transformation. This case report focuses on an 80-year-old patient diagnosed with low-grade follicular lymphoma which subsequently transformed leading to the patient's eventual demise as the patient took on the palliative intent. This case report aims to highlight the importance of clinical markers or prognostic factors to identify patients, specifically the elderly population who are at risk of transformation to aggressive forms when their FL remains at stage I-II phases. Currently, elderly patients with FL tend to be quickly dismissed with curative intent with chemotherapy, given their age and comorbidities, despite forming the majority of the population with follicular lymphoma. Age more than 60 years old has been shown to be one of the most powerful yet poor prognostic features in follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI)-the main scoring system used for FL. Hence, further studies are required to look into the tailoring treatment for elderly patients with follicular lymphoma after risk stratifying them with appropriate clinical and prognostic markers.

Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT may predict the outcome of newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma in patients managed with initial "watch-and-wait" approach

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT can predict the outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL) in patients managed with an initial "watch-and-wait" approach.

METHODS

Thirty-eight newly diagnosed FL patients who were managed with an initial "watch-and-wait" approach and undergone baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled. The standard uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of FL lesions were measured on PET/CT. Patients were followed up for at least 24 months or until initiation of FL therapy. The endpoint was the time to initiation of lymphoma treatment (TLT).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 28 months (range 3-94 months), lymphoma treatment was initiated in 21/38 (55.3%) patients (median 15 months, range 3-51 months). Patients with TLT < 24 months showed SUVmax and TLG values significantly higher than those with TLT ≥ 24 months (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated cutoff values of SUVmax > 9.5, MTV > 90.62 ml, and TLG > 144.96 SUVbw*ml were optimal for predicting TLT < 24 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed SUVmax > 9.5, MTV > 90.62 ml, and TLG > 144.96 SUVbw*ml had statistically significant correlations with shorter TLT (p < 0.01). Lymph node regions ≥ 3 and lymph nodes > 3 cm had almost significance (p < 0.1). In multivariate analysis, SUVmax > 9.5 (HR 3.2 [95% CI 1.1-9.2], p = 0.033) and TLG > 144.96 SUVbw*ml (HR 9.3 [95% CI 1.8-47.7], p = 0.008) were demonstrated to be independent predictive factors for shorter TLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic indices (SUVmax and TLG) of baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT could predict the outcome independently in FL patients under an initial "watch-and-wait" approach.

KEY POINTS

• "Watch-and-wait" approach is part of the overall treatment plan in asymptomatic patients with low tumor burden FL. However, the time to initiation of active treatment varies from months to years. • In our retrospective study of 38 patients with FL managed with an initial "watch-and-wait" approach, the SUVmax and TLG were demonstrated to be independent predictive factors for time to initiation of FL treatment. • Baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT may help to better select patients with FL who are most likely to benefit from "watch-and-wait" management.

18F-FDG PET/computed tomography may predict the outcome of newly diagnosed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients managed with initial 'watch-and-wait' approach

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in the outcome of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in patients managed with initial 'watch-and-wait' treatment.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with newly diagnosed NHL treated with initial watchful waiting were retrospectively recruited. They had a baseline F-FDG PET/CT and at least one follow-up PET/CT. The standard uptake values (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesions glycolysis (TLG) of lymphoma were measured in PET/CT. They were followed up for at least 2 years or until disease progression. The endpoint was the time to initiation of lymphoma treatment (TLT).

RESULTS

Comparing the baseline and the follow-up PET/CT, four out of 16 patients showed spontaneous regression of lymphoma, three of the 16 patients had stable disease and the remaining nine of the 16 patients had progressive disease in the follow-up PET/CT. After a median follow-up of 32 months (range 14-90 months), 10/16 patients had progressive disease and chemotherapy was initiated. The median TLT was 21.0 months. In univariate analysis, MTV and TLG in baseline PET/CT were significant to predict TLT. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a statistical difference for TLT in the two groups of patients stratified by MTV or TLG at baseline (median TLT, 66.0 months vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.007). However, patients' age, Ann Arbor staging, International Prognostic Index and SUVmax were not significant.

CONCLUSION

A proportion of patients with NHL might experience spontaneous regression of lymphoma. F-FDG PET/CT turned out as a prognostic factor for TLT in patients with NHL under watchful waiting.

Does Up-front Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation at First Relapse Improve Outcome in Transplant-Eligible Follicular Lymphoma Patients Whose Disease Relapses Within 24 Months?

BACKGROUND

In Canadian adults, follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Approximately 20% of patients with FL experience progression of disease within 2 years of first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Those patients have an expected overall survival of less than 5 years. The optimal second-line treatment for these high-risk patients is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from the Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation Center at Ottawa Hospital to determine whether autologous stem-cell transplantation as up-front therapy for first relapse can improve outcomes in this high-risk FL subgroup. We identified 17 patients who underwent up-front autologous stem-cell transplantation between February 2012 and February 2019.

RESULTS

The disease of all patients had relapsed within 24 months after receipt of their first rituximab-based chemotherapy. Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55-96) and 71.8% (95% CI, 31-91), respectively. The progression-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 62.6% (95% CI, 35-81) and 53.6% (95% CI, 25-75), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival is improved when receiving autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation as up-front therapy at first relapse in transplant-eligible FL whose disease relapses within 24 months of first-line therapy. Data from our single center look promising, but the data need to be replicated with a larger sample size.

Long-Term Results of the FOLL05 Trial Comparing R-CVP Versus R-CHOP Versus R-FM for the Initial Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Symptomatic Follicular Lymphoma

Purpose The FOLL05 trial compared R-CVP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and R-FM (rituximab plus fludarabine and mitoxantrone) regimens without rituximab maintenance as initial therapy for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). A previous analysis with a median follow-up of 34 months showed a superior 3-year time to treatment failure, the primary study end point, with R-CHOP and R-FM versus R-CVP and showed R-CHOP to have a better risk-benefit ratio in terms of toxicity than R-FM. We report a post hoc analysis of this trial after a median follow-up of 7 years. Patients and Methods Of the 534 enrolled patients, 504 were evaluable. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 84 months (range, 1 to 119 months). Results The 8-year time to treatment failure and progression-free survival rates were 44% (95% CI, 39% to 49%) and 48% (95% CI, 43% to 53%), respectively. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival adjusted by FL International Prognostic Index 2 versus R-CVP was 0.73 for R-CHOP (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = .037) and 0.67 for R-FM (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.91; P = .009). The 8-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83% (95% CI, 79% to 87%), with no significant differences among study arms. Overall, we observed a higher risk of dying as a result of causes unrelated to lymphoma progression with R-FM versus R-CVP. Conclusion With an 83% 8-year OS rate, long-term follow-up of the FOLL05 trial confirms the favorable outcome of patients with advanced-stage FL treated with immunochemotherapy. The three study arms had similar OS but different activity and toxicity profiles. Patients initially treated with R-CVP had a higher risk of lymphoma progression compared with those receiving R-CHOP, as well as a higher risk of requiring additional therapy.

Orbital MALT Lymphoma after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Follicular Lymphoma as Relapse of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

We report a patient who developed orbital MALT lymphoma after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma as relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. A 54-year-old woman with systemic lymphadenopathy was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by left supraclavicular lymph node biopsy, and underwent 6 courses of R-CHOP chemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone, leading to complete response. Five years later in the follow-up, an abdominal mass with abnormal uptake was found by whole-body 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography, and computed tomography-guided biopsy demonstrated follicular lymphoma. She underwent 4 courses of R-IDEA chemotherapy with rituximab, ifosfamide, dexamethasone, etoposide, and cytarabine, resulting in partial response, and then, underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning with R-MCEC chemotherapy (rituximab, ranimustine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and carboplatin). She was well for the following 3 years with no treatment until the development of a right orbital mass. The excisional biopsy this time revealed MALT lymphoma. She underwent 3 courses with rituximab monotherapy and local orbital radiation at the total dose of 30 Gy. She had no relapse for the following three years. Relapse as MALT lymphoma after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory lymphoma may not be a poor prognostic sign.

A Canadian perspective on the subcutaneous administration of rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Rituximab is widely used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, being a key component in most therapeutic regimens. Administration of the intravenous (IV) formulation is lengthy and places a significant burden on health care resources and patient quality of life. A subcutaneous (sc) formulation that provides a fixed dose of rituximab is being examined in a number of studies. Results indicate that the pharmacokinetics are noninferior and response rates are comparable to those obtained with the IV formulation. Moreover, the sc formulation is preferred by patients and health care providers and reduces administration and chair time. Additional advantages include a lesser potential for dosing errors, shorter preparation time, reduced drug wastage, and fewer infusion-related reactions. Despite the success of the sc formulation, correct administration is needed to reduce administration-related reactions. By using a careful procedure, the sc formulation can be given safely and effectively, potentially reducing the burden on health care resources and improving quality of life for patients.

Emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

With no treatment standard having been established for relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma, a number of therapeutic approaches are used in Canada. In patients who relapse early or who eventually become resistant to subsequent treatment, prognosis is poor, and new approaches are needed. A number of novel therapies are being examined in this setting, including monoclonal antibodies, immunoconjugates, immunomodulatory agents, and signal transduction inhibitors. With the body of evidence for those emerging therapies accumulating and the standard upfront treatment changing from rituximab and chop (cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone) or rituximab and cvp (cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone) to bendamustine and rituximab, treatment decisions in the relapsed and refractory setting have become more complex. The choice of subsequent treatment must consider type of upfront treatment; duration of remission; and patient-related factors such as age, comorbidities, and treatment preferences. This paper summarizes the evidence for novel therapies and proposes recommendations for subsequent treatment options by remission duration after induction and maintenance.

Is watch and wait still acceptable for patients with low-grade follicular lymphoma?

Follicular lymphoma (FL) represents more than 20% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas worldwide and approximately 30% of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas diagnosed in the United States. Although occasionally localized at the time of diagnosis, most patients have disseminated disease. However, patients are frequently asymptomatic, and this, in combination with a long median survival, led to the initial studies of observing asymptomatic patients without initial therapy, ie, "watch and wait." Since the initial report of watch and wait as a treatment strategy for patients with low-grade FL, our understanding of the biology of the disease has advanced; multiple active new agents have been introduced into practice, and the survival of patients with low-grade FL has improved. Given these changes, is watch and wait still an acceptable treatment recommendation for a newly diagnosed patient with low-grade FL?

Optimal use of bendamustine in hematologic disorders: Treatment recommendations from an international consensus panel - an update

Bendamustine has achieved widespread international regulatory approval and is a standard agent for the treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Since approval, the number of indications for bendamustine has expanded to include aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma and novel targeted therapies, based on new bendamustine regimens/combinations, are being developed against CLL and lymphomas. In 2010, an international panel of bendamustine experts met and published a set of recommendations on the safe and effective use of bendamustine in patients suffering from hematologic disorders. In 2014, this panel met again to update these recommendations since the clarification of issues including optimal dosing and management of bendamustine-related toxicities. The aim of this report is to communicate the latest consensus on the use of bendamustine, permitting the expansion of its safe and effective administration, particularly in new combination therapies.

An open-label expanded-access trial of bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma or previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: BEND-ACT

BACKGROUND

Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent with unique properties that distinguish it from other agents in its class. Bendamustine is used as monotherapy or in combination with other agents to treat patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (nhl) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (cll).

METHODS

The prospective interventional open-label bend-act trial evaluated bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent nhl (inhl) and previously untreated cll. Study objectives were to assess the safety and tolerability of bendamustine monotherapy and to provide patients with access to bendamustine before Health Canada approval. The study aimed to enrol up to 100 patients. All patients with inhl received an intravenous dose of bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) over 60 minutes on days 1 and 2 for up to eight 21- or 28-day treatment cycles. All patients with cll received an intravenous dose of bendamustine 100 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 2 for up to six 28-day treatment cycles.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients treated on study (16 with cll and 74 with inhl), 35 completed the study (4 with cll and 31 with inhl). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (teaes) were nausea (70%), fatigue (57%), vomiting (40%), and diarrhea (33%)-mostly grades 1 and 2. Ondansetron was the most common supportive medication used in the patients (63.5% of those with inhl and 68.8% of those with cll). Neutropenia (32%), anemia (23%), and thrombocytopenia (21%) were the most frequent hematologic teaes, with neutropenia being the most common grade 3 or 4 teae leading to dose modification. Dose delays occurred in 28 patients (31.3%) because of grade 3 or 4 teaes, with a higher incidence of dose delays being observed in inhl patients on the 21-day treatment cycle than in those on the 28-day treatment cycle (50.0% vs. 24.1%). During the study, 33 patients (36.7%) experienced at least 1 serious adverse event, and 4 deaths were reported (all in patients with inhl).

CONCLUSIONS

The type and frequency of the teaes reported accorded with observations in earlier clinical trials and post-marketing experiences, thus confirming the acceptable and manageable safety profile of bendamustine.