Efficacy of Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Current approach to Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a unique CD20+, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the bone marrow and circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin M. The clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients are highly variable. High-level evidence supports integration of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the chemotherapy backbone to treat WM. However, its contemporary management has become more nuanced, with deeper understanding of the pathophysiology and incorporation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors to the treatment paradigm. Prior knowledge of the patients' MYD88L265P and CXCR4 mutation status may aid in the treatment decision-making. Currently, the two frequently utilized approaches include fixed-duration chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitor-based continuous treatment until progression. Randomized trials comparing these two vastly divergent approaches are lacking. Recent studies demonstrating efficacy of B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) inhibitors and non-covalent BTK inhibitors in patients, previously exposed to a covalent BTK inhibitor, are a testament to the rapidly expanding options against WM.

Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia: Tailoring Therapy for the Individual

With the introduction of multiple new effective therapeutic options for the treatment of macroglobulinemia, a structured approach to management of this rare lymphoma is currently needed. A review of phase II and III treatment trials over the past 20 years was performed, and high-quality trials are summarized in this manuscript. Because of the lack of large prospective trials comparing different classes of therapy, a uniform recommendation applicable to all patients cannot be made, and the approach must be individualized incorporating patient preferences, comorbidities, and the range of therapeutic toxicities. Therapeutic options for patients with newly diagnosed and previously treated macroglobulinemia are presented on the basis of the best available evidence in the literature.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Waldenström Macroglobulinemia - 2021 Update on Management and Future Directions

Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a low-grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. It is defined by having ≥ 10% bone marrow infiltration with lymphoplasmacytic cells and/or an immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy of ≥3g/dL. Risk factors include a personal history of IgM MGUS, and a family history of WM or a related disorder. Race, sex, and chronic antigen stimulation also appear to influence risk. Between 93 to 97% of patients with WM have a somatic mutation of the MYD88 gene. Of these, approximately 30% also have a mutation of CXCR4. The presence of a MYD88 mutation is associated with higher 10-year overall survival (90% vs. 73%; P < .001), while CXCR4 mutation status does not appear to have a similar effect. Based on consensus guidelines, WM patients with a disease-related hemoglobin level of less than 10g/dL, a platelet count of less than 100×10 9/L, bulky adenopathy or organomegaly, symptomatic hyperviscosity, severe neuropathy, amyloidosis, cryoglobulinemia, cold agglutinin disease, or evidence of disease transformation, should be considered for immediate therapy. Patients not meeting these criteria may be observed, with monitoring at 3 to 6 month intervals. When treatment is warranted, combinations of rituximab with alkylating agents and proteasome inhibitors are often effective, as are Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors. Selection among available regimens should take patients' gene mutation profile, disease-related features, and co-morbid conditions into account. Promising novel therapies in development include non-covalent BTK inhibitors, CXCR4 antagonists, BCL 2 inhibitors, bi-specific antibodies, radioimmunoconjugates, and CD19- and CD20-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells.

Treatment paradigm in Waldenström macroglobulinemia: frontline therapy and beyond

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Recent strides made in the genomic profiling of patients with WM have led to the identification of many novel therapeutic targets. Patients with WM can present with asymptomatic disease and not all patients require treatment. When criteria for initiating systemic therapy are met, the choice of therapy depends on the tumor genotype (MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status), patient preference (fixed versus continuous duration therapy, oral versus intravenous route, cost), associated medical comorbidities, and adverse effect profile of the treatment. In the absence of head-to-head comparison between chemoimmunotherapy and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors in otherwise fit patients with a MYD88^L265P mutation, our preference is fixed duration therapy with four to six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine–rituximab. In this review, we discuss the role of MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation in treatment selection, and current data for frontline and salvage treatment options in patients with WM.

Diagnosis and management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia-A British Society for Haematology guideline

SCOPE

The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the management of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. In individual patients, circumstances may dictate an alternative approach.

METHODOLOGY

This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at http://www.b-s-h.org.uk/guidelines/proposing-and-writing-a-new-bsh-guideline/. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Central, Web of Science searches from beginning of 2013 (since the publication of the previous guidelines) up to November 2021. The following search terms were used: Waldenström('s) macroglobulin(a)emia OR lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, IgM(-related) neuropathy OR cold h(a)emagglutinin disease OR cold agglutinin disease OR cryoglobulin(a)emia AND (for group a only) cytogenetic OR molecular OR mutation OR MYD88 OR CXCR4, management OR treatment OR transfusion OR supportive care OR plasma exchange OR plasmapheresis OR chemotherapy OR bendamustine OR bortezomib OR ibrutinib OR fludarabine OR dexamethasone OR cyclophosphamide OR rituximab OR everolimus, bone marrow transplantation OR stem cell transplantation. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org. Review of the manuscript was performed by the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haemato-Oncology Task Force, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haemato-Oncology sounding board of BSH. It was also on the members section of the BSH website for comment. It has also been reviewed by UK Charity WMUK; these organisations do not necessarily approve or endorse the contents.

Post-relapse survival in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients experiencing therapy failure following autologous transplantation

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare B-cell lymphoproliferative malignancy. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is considered in a subset of WM patients with relapsed disease. While registry data has shown a benefit for auto-HCT in relapsed WM, there is a paucity of data on outcomes of patients relapsing after auto-HCT. Eligibility criteria included adult patients with relapsed/refractory WM who underwent auto-HCT between 2007 and 2017. The primary endpoint was post-relapse overall survival (PR-OS). Secondary endpoints were to identify factors prognostic of PR-OS. Of the 48 patients with WM who underwent auto-HCT, 22 (46%) experienced relapse following auto-HCT. Median PR-OS of relapsed WM patients after auto-HCT (n = 22) was not reached (NR) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.5 months-NR). Among patients who relapsed <1 year versus ≥1 year from auto-HCT, the median PR-OS was 18.4 months (95%CI: 0.8-NR) months and NR (95%CI: 17.5-NR), respectively (p = 0.06). Of note, disease status at the time of transplant, CR/VGPR versus partial remission did not appear to impact PR-OS. The median PR-OS was significantly longer in patients who received ibrutinib in the post-transplant setting compared to those who did not (NR vs. 18.4 months, 95%CI: 9.1-NR, p = 0.02). On univariable analysis, the presence of complex karyotype (RR = 4.87, 95% CI = 1.22-19.53) and a higher number of prior lines of therapy (RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.23-2.67) were associated with a significantly higher risk of relapse. This is the only study to date that evaluated outcomes of WM patients who relapsed following auto-HCT and provides a benchmark for future trials evaluating survival following auto-HCT relapse.

Successful Treatment of Factor X Deficiency in a Patient with Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma with Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Regimen: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Acquired factor X deficiency is an uncommon condition, and affected individuals have severe and spontaneous bleeding. The associated conditions include malignancy, infection, burn, and inflammatory bowel disease. Many previous studies reported association between lymphoproliferative disease and factor X disappearance. Amyloid deposition causing factor X absorption was the most common mechanism. Here, we report a case of stage IV lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) with factor X deficiency who was successfully treated with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen.

Case Presentation

A 52-year-old Thai woman presented with heavy menorrhea, hoarseness, and widespread ecchymosis at her extremities. On physical examination, the patient had bilateral periorbital purpura and vocal cord hematoma. Coagulation testing showed prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and prolonged activated thromboplastin time (aPTT); however, after mixing with 1:1 normal pooled plasma, PT and aPTT were both corrected to normal levels. Factor assays demonstrated markedly decreased factor X levels, but no presence of factor X inhibitor. Bone marrow examination revealed numerous abnormal lymphoplasmacytoid lymphocytes with kappa light chain expression. Serum free light chain assay also showed kappa light chain restriction [kappa 716.16 mg/L, lambda 16.96 mg/L, ratio 42.23 (0.26–1.65)]. The patient was diagnosed as lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with factor X deficiency. She received chemotherapy with 6 cycles of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen. The patient responded favorably to treatment, she remains in lymphoma remission at one year after diagnosis, and her factor X level was more than 20%.

Conclusion

We performed a literature review to identify previous case reports about lymphoma-associated factor X deficiency or inhibitor to determine a possible explanation in our patient. It is important to emphasize that when patients present with acquired factor deficiency, including factor X, lymphoproliferative disease is commonly one of the underlying conditions. Furthermore, the recovery of coagulation factor deficiency is possible if successful remission of lymphoma can be achieved.

How to Sequence Therapies in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

OPINION STATEMENT

There are multiple treatment options in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, including chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, and covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. The choice of therapy should take into account the patient's clinical presentation, comorbidities, and preferences. A thorough discussion should take place to outline the administration, safety, and efficacy of the regimens under consideration. The patient's genomic profile can provide insightful information for the treatment selection. In the frontline and relapsed settings, we favor ibrutinib monotherapy over chemoimmunotherapy or proteasome inhibitor-based regimens in patients with MYD88 and without CXCR4 mutations. For patients with MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations or without MYD88 or CXCR4 mutations, chemoimmunotherapy or proteasome inhibitor-based regimens are favored, but efficacy data with ibrutinib in combination with rituximab and with novel covalent BTK inhibitors are emerging. Autologous stem cell transplant should be considered in special cases in the relapsed setting. Participation in clinical trials is positively encouraged in WM patients in frontline and relapsed settings. Agents of interest include the BCL2 antagonist venetoclax, the CXCR4 inhibitor mavorixafor, and the non-covalent BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib and ARQ-531.

Systematic Reviews in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: Considerations and Guidance from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee

Systematic reviews apply rigorous methodologies to address a prespecified, clearly formulated clinical research question. The conclusion that results is often cited to more robustly inform decision making by clinicians, third-party payers, and managed care organizations about the clinical question of interest. Although systematic reviews provide a rigorous standard, they may be infeasible when the task is to create general disease-focused guidelines comprising multiple clinical practice questions versus a single major clinical practice question. Collaborating transplantation and cellular therapy society committees also recognize that the quantity and or quality of reference sources may be insufficient for a meaningful systematic review. As the conduct of systematic reviews has evolved over time in terms of grading systems, reporting requirements, and use of technology, here we provide current guidance on methodologies, resources for reviewers, and approaches to overcome challenges in conducting systematic reviews in transplantation and cellular therapy.

Systematic reviews in hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy: considerations and guidance from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research late effects and quality of life working committee

Systematic reviews apply rigorous methodologies to address a pre-specified, clearly formulated clinical research question. The conclusion that results is often cited to more robustly inform decision-making by clinicians, third-party payers and managed care organizations about the clinical question of interest. While systematic reviews provide a rigorous standard, they may be unfeasible when the task is to create general disease-focused guidelines comprised of multiple clinical practice questions versus a single major clinical practice question. Collaborating transplantation and cellular therapy societal committees also recognize that the quantity and or quality of reference sources may be insufficient for a meaningful systematic review. As the conduct of systematic reviews has evolved over time in terms of grading systems, reporting requirements and use of technology, here we provide current guidance in methodologies, resources for reviewers, and approaches to overcome challenges in conducting systematic reviews in transplantation and cellular therapy.