1
|
Sherman AC, van Haren SD, Borberg E, Swank Z, Aleissa M, Tong A, Rooks R, Kanwal U, Levine H, Yates B, Izaguirre N, Ryff K, Thomas S, Parisi L, Li X, Walt DR, Levy O, Walsh SR, Issa NC, Baden LR. Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine for individuals with hematological malignancies after a primary SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine series. Vaccine 2024:S0264-410X(24)00695-9. [PMID: 38862310 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Heterologous COVID-19 vaccine boosters have not been evaluated for patients with hematological malignancies. A Novavax booster was administered for 56 individuals with hematological malignancies who had received a primary COVID-19 series and prior boosters with mRNA vaccines only. Blood specimens were obtained at baseline (pre-vaccine), 28 days, and 168 days after vaccination with the Novavax booster. The median fold change of anti-Spike IgG was 1.02 (IQR 0.79, 1.3) between baseline and Day 28. Circulating Spike protein-specific B cells increased 1.4-fold at Day 28 (p < 0.05). Increases in antibody and T cell responses were modest without significance, with a waning of humoral and cellular responses at 168 days after vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Sherman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Precision Vaccines Program, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Simon D van Haren
- Precision Vaccines Program, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ella Borberg
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zoe Swank
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Muneerah Aleissa
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alexandra Tong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca Rooks
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Urwah Kanwal
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hannah Levine
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bridget Yates
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalie Izaguirre
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Ryff
- Precision Vaccines Program, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sanya Thomas
- Precision Vaccines Program, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lindsey Parisi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaofang Li
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David R Walt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ofer Levy
- Precision Vaccines Program, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Stephen R Walsh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas C Issa
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lindsey R Baden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Merli M, Costantini A, Tafuri S, Bavaro DF, Minoia C, Meli E, Luminari S, Gini G. Management of vaccinations in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1617-1634. [PMID: 38532527 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Vaccinations are fundamental tools in preventing infectious diseases, especially in immunocompromised patients like those affected by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). The COVID-19 pandemic made clinicians increasingly aware of the importance of vaccinations in preventing potential life-threatening SARS-CoV-2-related complications in NHL patients. However, several studies have confirmed a significant reduction in vaccine-induced immune responses after anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment, thus underscoring the need for refined immunization strategies in NHL patients. In this review, we summarize the existing data about COVID-19 and other vaccine's efficacy in patients with NHL and propose multidisciplinary team-based recommendations for the management of vaccines in this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Merli
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Costantini
- Clinical Immunology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche - Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Davide Fiore Bavaro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Carla Minoia
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Erika Meli
- Division of Hematology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Hematology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Surgical Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences Related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Guido Gini
- Clinic of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Delle Marche - Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silzle T, Kahlert CR, Albrich WC, Nigg S, Demmer Steingruber R, Driessen C, Fischer S. Humoral and cellular BNT162b2 mRNA-based booster vaccine-induced immunity in patients with multiple myeloma and persistence of neutralising antibodies: results of a prospective single-centre cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly 2023; 153:40090. [PMID: 37410944 DOI: 10.57187/smw.2023.40090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently available messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based vaccines against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been shown to be effective even in highly immunocompromised hosts, including patients with multiple myeloma. However, vaccination failure can be observed in all patient groups. METHODS This prospective study longitudinally assessed the humoral and cellular responses to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine in patients with myeloma (n = 59) and healthy controls (n = 22) by measuring the levels of anti-spike (S) antibodies (electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay) including neutralising antibodies and specific T-cells (enzyme-linked immunospot assay) following booster administration. RESULTS The third booster dose showed a high immunogenicity on the serological level among the patients with multiple myeloma (median anti-S level = 41 binding antibody units [BAUs]/ml pre-booster vs 3902 BAU/ml post-booster, p <0.001; increase in the median neutralising antibody level from 19.8% to 97%, p <0.0001). Four of five (80%) patients with a complete lack of any serological response (anti-S immunoglobulin level <0.8 BAU/ml) after two vaccine doses developed detectable anti-S antibodies after booster vaccination (median anti-S level = 88 BAU/ml post-booster). T-cell responses were largely preserved among the patients with multiple myeloma with no difference from the healthy controls following baseline vaccination (median spot-forming units [SFU]/106 of peripheral blood mononuclear cells = 193 vs 175, p = 0.711); these responses were augmented significantly after booster administration among the patients with multiple myeloma (median SFU/106 of peripheral blood mononuclear cells = 235 vs 443, p <0.001). However, the vaccination responses remained highly heterogeneous and diminished over time, with insufficient serological responses occurring even after booster vaccination in a few patients irrespective of the treatment intensity. CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate improvements in humoral and cellular immunity following booster vaccination and support the assessment of the humoral vaccine response in patients with multiple myeloma until a threshold for protection against severe COVID-19 is validated. This strategy can allow the identification of patients who might benefit from additional protective measures (e.g. pre-exposure prophylaxis via passive immunisation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Silzle
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian R Kahlert
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Werner C Albrich
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Nigg
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ruth Demmer Steingruber
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Driessen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Terpos E, Musto P, Engelhardt M, Delforge M, Cook G, Gay F, van de Donk NWCJ, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Vangsted AJ, Driessen C, Schjesvold F, Cerchione C, Zweegman S, Hajek R, Moreau P, Einsele H, San-Miguel J, Boccadoro M, Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Ludwig H. Management of patients with multiple myeloma and COVID-19 in the post pandemic era: a consensus paper from the European Myeloma Network (EMN). Leukemia 2023:10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1. [PMID: 37142661 PMCID: PMC10157596 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
In the post-pandemic COVID-19 period, human activities have returned to normal and COVID-19 cases are usually mild. However, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present an increased risk for breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization and death. The European Myeloma Network has provided an expert consensus to guide patient management in this era. Vaccination with variant-specific booster vaccines, such as the bivalent vaccine for the ancestral Wuhan strain and the Omicron BA.4/5 strains, is essential as novel strains emerge and become dominant in the community. Boosters should be administered every 6-12 months after the last vaccine shot or documented COVID-19 infection (hybrid immunity). Booster shots seem to overcome the negative effect of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies on humoral responses; however, anti-BCMA treatment remains an adverse predictive factor for humoral immune response. Evaluation of the immune response after vaccination may identify a particularly vulnerable subset of patients who may need additional boosters, prophylactic therapies and prevention measures. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab is not effective against the new dominant variants and thus is no longer recommended. Oral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir) and remdesivir are effective against Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4, BA.5, BQ.1.1 and/or XBB.1.5 and should be administered in MM patients at the time of a positive COVID-19 test or within 5 days post symptoms onset. Convalescent plasma seems to have low value in the post-pandemic era. Prevention measures during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, including mask wearing and avoiding crowded places, seem prudent to continue for MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Pellegrino Musto
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
- Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Monika Engelhardt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Interdisciplinary Cancer Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michel Delforge
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gordon Cook
- CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trial Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Annette Juul Vangsted
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph Driessen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B-Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claudio Cerchione
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jesus San-Miguel
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, First Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology, Hematology, and Palliative Care, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cheng GS, Crothers K, Aliberti S, Bergeron A, Boeckh M, Chien JW, Cilloniz C, Cohen K, Dean N, Dela Cruz CS, Dickson RP, Greninger AL, Hage CA, Hohl TM, Holland SM, Jones BE, Keane J, Metersky M, Miller R, Puel A, Ramirez J, Restrepo MI, Sheshadri A, Staitieh B, Tarrand J, Winthrop KL, Wunderink RG, Evans SE. Immunocompromised Host Pneumonia: Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:341-353. [PMID: 36856712 PMCID: PMC9993146 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202212-1019st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Pneumonia imposes a significant clinical burden on people with immunocompromising conditions. Millions of individuals live with compromised immunity because of cytotoxic cancer treatments, biological therapies, organ transplants, inherited and acquired immunodeficiencies, and other immune disorders. Despite broad awareness among clinicians that these patients are at increased risk for developing infectious pneumonia, immunocompromised people are often excluded from pneumonia clinical guidelines and treatment trials. The absence of a widely accepted definition for immunocompromised host pneumonia is a significant knowledge gap that hampers consistent clinical care and research for infectious pneumonia in these vulnerable populations. To address this gap, the American Thoracic Society convened a workshop whose participants had expertise in pulmonary disease, infectious diseases, immunology, genetics, and laboratory medicine, with the goal of defining the entity of immunocompromised host pneumonia and its diagnostic criteria.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun H, Bu F, Li L, Zhang X, Yan J, Huang T. COVID-19 vaccine response and safety in patients with cancer: An overview of systematic reviews. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1072137. [PMID: 36457318 PMCID: PMC9707626 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, the COVID-19 pandemic does not appear to be overcome with new variants continuously emerging. The vaccination against COVID-19 has been the trend, but there are multiple systematic reviews on COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer, resulting in redundant and sub-optimal systematic reviews. There are still some doubts about efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients. Purpose To identify, summarize and synthesize the available evidence of systematic reviews on response and COVID-19 vaccine safety in patients with cancer. Methods Multiple databases were searched from their inception to May 1, 2022 to fetch the relevant articles. Study quality was assessed by AMSTAR2. The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022327931). Results A total of 18 articles were finally included. The seroconversion rates after first dose were ranged from 37.30-54.20% in all cancers, 49.60-62.00% in solid cancers and 33.30-56.00% in hematological malignancies. The seroconversion rates after second dose were ranged from 65.30-87.70% in all cancers, 91.60-96.00% in solid cancers and 58.00-72.60% in hematological malignancies. Cancer types and types of therapy could influence vaccine response. COVID-19 vaccines were safe and well-tolerated. Conclusions This study suggests COVID-19 vaccine response is significantly lower in cancer patients. Number of received doses, cancer types and treatment strategies could influence response of COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients. COVID-19 vaccines are safe and well-tolerated. Considering the emergence of several new variants of SARS-CoV-2 with potential influence on ongoing vaccination programs, there is a need for booster doses to increase the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022327931, identifier CRD42022327931.
Collapse
|
7
|
Krekeler C, Reitnauer L, Bacher U, Khandanpour C, Steger L, Boeckel GR, Klosner J, Tepasse PR, Kemper M, Hennies MT, Mesters R, Stelljes M, Schmitz N, Kerkhoff A, Schliemann C, Mikesch JH, Schmidt N, Lenz G, Bleckmann A, Shumilov E. Efficacy of COVID-19 Booster Vaccines in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: Experiences in a Real-World Scenario. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225512. [PMID: 36428605 PMCID: PMC9688056 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Two-dose COVID-19 vaccination often results in poor humoral response rates in patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs); yet responses to COVID-19 booster vaccines and the risk of COVID-19 infection post-booster are mostly uncertain. Methods: We included 200 outpatients with HMs and predominantly lymphoid neoplasms (96%, 191/200) in our academic center and reported on the humoral responses, which were assessed by measurement of anti-spike IgG antibodies in peripheral blood as early as 14 days after mRNA-based prime-boost vaccination, as well as factors hampering booster efficacy. Previous basic (double) immunization was applied according to the local recommendations with mRNA- and/or vector-based vaccines. We also report on post-booster COVID-19 breakthrough infections that emerged in the Omicron era and the prophylaxis strategies that were applied to poor and non-responders to booster vaccines. Results: A total of 55% (110/200) of the patients achieved seroconversion (i.e., anti-spike protein IgG antibody titer > 100 AU/mL assessed in median 48 days after prime-boost vaccination) after prime-boost vaccination. Multivariable analyses revealed age, lymphocytopenia, ongoing treatment and prior anti-CD20 B-cell depletion to be independent predictors for booster failure. With each month between anti-CD20-mediated B-cell depletion and booster vaccination, the probability of seroconversion increased by approximately 4% (p < 0.001) and serum−antibody titer (S-AbT) levels increased by 90 AU/mL (p = 0.011). Notably, obinutuzumab treatment was associated with an 85% lower probability for seroconversion after prime-boost vaccination compared to rituximab (p = 0.002). Of poor or non-responders to prime-boost vaccination, 41% (47/114) underwent a second booster and 73% (83/114) underwent passive immunization. COVID-19 breakthrough infections were observed in 15% (29/200) of patients after prime-boost vaccination with predominantly mild courses (93%). Next to seroconversion, passive immunization was associated with a significantly lower risk of COVID-19 breakthrough infections after booster, even in vaccine non-responders (all p < 0.05). In a small proportion of analyzed patients with myeloid neoplasms (9/200), the seroconversion rate was higher compared to those with lymphoid ones (78% vs. 54%, accordingly), while the incidence rate of COVID-19 breakthrough infections was similar (22% vs. 14%, respectively). Following the low frequency of myeloid neoplasms in this study, the results may not be automatically applied to a larger cohort. Conclusions: Patients with HMs are at a high risk of COVID-19 booster vaccine failure; yet COVID-19 breakthrough infections after prime-boost vaccination are predominantly mild. Booster failure can likely be overcome by passive immunization, thereby providing immune protection against COVID-19 and attenuating the severity of COVID-19 courses. Further sophistication of clinical algorithms for preventing post-vaccination COVID-19 breakthrough infections is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Krekeler
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Lea Reitnauer
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Ulrike Bacher
- Central Hematology Laboratory, Department of Hematology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cyrus Khandanpour
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Department for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23564 Luebeck, Germany
| | - Leander Steger
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Göran Ramin Boeckel
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clinical Infectiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Department of Medicine D for Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Justine Klosner
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Phil-Robin Tepasse
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clinical Infectiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Marcel Kemper
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Marc Tim Hennies
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Rolf Mesters
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Matthias Stelljes
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Andrea Kerkhoff
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Christoph Schliemann
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Jan-Henrik Mikesch
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Nicole Schmidt
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), 37077 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Georg Lenz
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Annalen Bleckmann
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Evgenii Shumilov
- Department of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reply to Çınar et al. Comment on "Zamfir et al. Hematologic Malignancies Diagnosed in the Context of the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign: A Report of Two Cases. Medicina 2022, 58, 874". MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58111576. [PMID: 36363533 PMCID: PMC9697811 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58111576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
We would like to thank Çınar et al. for their appreciation and insightful discussions presented in their comment [...].
Collapse
|
9
|
Second Booster BNT162b2 Restores SARS-CoV-2 Humoral Response in Patients With Multiple Myeloma, Excluding Those Under Anti-BCMA Therapy. Hemasphere 2022; 6:e764. [PMID: 35928542 PMCID: PMC9345642 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination leads to a less intense humoral response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared with healthy individuals, whereas the SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity fades over time. The purpose of this study was to explore the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in patients with MM after vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, focusing on their response before (B4D) and at 1 month after the fourth vaccination (M1P4D). Overall, 201 patients with a median age of 67 years were included, whereas 114 (56.7%) were men. The median NAbs levels B4D were 80.0% (±3.5%) and at M1P4D they increased to a median value of 96.1% (±3.7%). The NAb values at M1P4D were similar to those at 1 month post the third dose and superior to all previous timepoints. At M1P4D, the NAbs levels of all the treatment groups increased, apart from the anti-BCMA group. A significant increase in median NAbs values was observed for those receiving CD38-based treatment (n = 43, from 71.0% B4D to 96.0% at M1P4D) and those who did not receive CD38- or BCMA-targeted therapy (n = 137, from 89.6% B4D to 96.3% at M1P4D). Regarding the patients under BCMA-based therapy (n = 21), there was no remarkable increase in NAbs values following the second booster shot (from 3.0% B4D to 4.0% at M1P4D). In conclusion, booster vaccination with the BNT162b2 results in a substantially improved humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with MM. Anti-BCMA treatment remains an adverse predictive factor for NAbs response; thus, tailored prevention measures should be considered for this patient subgroup.
Collapse
|