1
|
Slevin F, Alexander S, Brown SR, Carter M, Choudhury A, Clipson A, Din O, Dive C, Gilbert A, Girvan S, Hingorani M, Jain S, Khoo V, Lilley J, Murray LJ, Naismith O, Noutch S, Oliveira P, Pagett CJH, Smith A, Talbot J, Webster J, Henry AM. Pelvis Or Involved Node Treatment: Eradicating Recurrence in Prostate Cancer (POINTER-PC) - study protocol paper for a phase III multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e095560. [PMID: 39725427 PMCID: PMC11683931 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men. Recurrence may occur in up to half of patients initially treated with curative intent for high-risk localised/locally advanced PCa. Pelvic nodal recurrence is common in this setting, but no clear standard of care exists for these patients, with potential therapeutic approaches including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the involved node(s) alone, extended nodal irradiation (ENI) to treat sites of potential micrometastatic spread in addition to involved node(s) and androgen deprivation therapy with or without additional systemic anticancer therapies. Based on observational studies, ENI is associated with promising metastasis-free survival (MFS) compared with SBRT and appears to result in low rates of severe late toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Pelvis Or Involved Node Treatment: Eradicating Recurrence in Prostate Cancer is a UK multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, which will deliver much needed, high-quality evidence of the impact on metastatic progression from ENI compared with SBRT in patients with PCa pelvic nodal recurrence. The trial will also evaluate the long-term toxicity of 5-fraction ENI compared with a standard 20-fraction schedule. The trail will randomise 480 participants in a ratio of 2:1:1 to SBRT, 5-fraction ENI or 20-fraction ENI from 35 to 40 UK radiotherapy sites over 4 years. Coprimary endpoints are MFS at 3 years and participant-reported late bowel toxicity at 3 years. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, biochemical progression-free survival, failure-free survival, patterns of failure, participant-reported/clinician-reported toxicity and health-related quality of life. Collection of blood and tissue samples will enable future evaluation of biomarkers of disease and toxicity and support stratification of salvage therapeutic approaches. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from NHS Health Research Authority, East of England - Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Research Ethics Committee (24/EE/0099). Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and adhere to International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN11089334, registered on 23 September 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sophie Alexander
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Sarah R Brown
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Carter
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexandra Clipson
- Cancer Research UK National Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Omar Din
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Caroline Dive
- Cancer Research UK National Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sean Girvan
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Vincent Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise J Murray
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Samantha Noutch
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Alexandra Smith
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - James Talbot
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Joanne Webster
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aman A, Akram A, Akram B, Husnain A, Akram A, Akram S, Ahmad E, Nadeem A. Salvage Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Nodal Oligo-Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102239. [PMID: 39561634 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Revised: 09/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer has a high frequency of relapse, and the relapse is usually associated with a nodal recurrence pattern spreading predominantly to fewer pelvic or extra-pelvic lymph nodes. This meta-analysis sought to determine the safety and survival outcomes of salvage body stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligo-recurrent nodal prostate cancer patients. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar to retrieve all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to May 2024. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), whereas survival outcomes were reported using hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% CI. RESULTS Three RCTs with a total of 312 patients (median age range of >18-79) were included. Of 312 patients, 135 received SBRT with medical therapy, while 122 underwent either observation, medical therapy, or elective nodal radiotherapy. SBRT significantly increased the biochemical recurrence-free survival (HR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73) with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). SBRT did not affect the grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity levels (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v4.0) (RR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32-1.70; (I2 = 0%) nor the grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity levels (CTCAE v4.0) (RR: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.26-4.31; I2 = 0%). SBRT was not associated with any significant change in the grade 1 toxicity levels (CTCAE v4.0) (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.62-1.89) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 63%). CONCLUSION SBRT improves biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with oligo-recurrent prostate cancer without increasing grade 1 and grade 2 GU/GI toxicity levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha Aman
- Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Arfa Akram
- Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Bisma Akram
- Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Ali Husnain
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Aleena Akram
- Department of Medicine, Shalamar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sania Akram
- Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Eeman Ahmad
- Department of Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Arsalan Nadeem
- Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van Werkhoven LA, Cammareri E, Hoogeman MS, Nout RA, Milder MTW, Nuyttens JJME. Stereotactic body radiation therapy on abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases: a systematic review on toxicity. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:822-832. [PMID: 39473177 PMCID: PMC11541805 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.40681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To review available data on toxicity during and/or after treatment of abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases (A-P LN) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to provide an overview of adverse events and its relation to dose or fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAH for studies published between the database inception and October 3rd, 2023. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with 1-5 A-P LN oligometastases, (2) treatment with SBRT to a median prescribed dose of ≥55 Gy BED10, and (3) description of acute and/or late toxicity. There were no language or date restrictions. RESULTS A total of 35 studies, including 1,512 patients, were selected. Late grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 0.6% and 0.1% of the patients treated for A-P LN oligometastases. All late adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred after treatment of the tumor with a minimum BED10 of 72 Gy. Of the 11 patients with severe late toxicity, five patients were re-irradiated. Late grade 2 and 1 toxicity was reported in 3.4% and 8.3% of the patients. Acute toxicity grades 4, 3, 2, and 1 occurred in 0.1%, 0.2%, 4.4%, and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION SBRT for A-P LN oligometastases show low toxicity rates. Nearly 50% of late adverse events ≥ grade 3 were associated with re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Van Werkhoven
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands.
| | - Eugenio Cammareri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike T W Milder
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lopez-Valcarcel M, Valcarcel FJ, Velasco J, Zapata I, Rodriguez R, Cardona J, Gil B, Cordoba S, Benlloch R, Hernandez M, Santana S, Gomez R, De la Fuente C, Garcia-Berrocal MI, Regueiro C, Romero J. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for pelvic nodal oligorecurrence in prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:445-453. [PMID: 39895963 PMCID: PMC11785391 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.101528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Background This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of oligometastatic pelvic node prostate cancer to delay androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Materials and methods Pelvic lymph node metastases were identified by 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT), and patients were not receiving ADT. SABR was administered using linear accelerators with intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy, at a prescribed dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions over 2 weeks. Response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 criteria, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were monitored post-SABR. Toxicity and quality of life were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Toxicity (CTCAE) v.5.0 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires QLQ-C30/QLQ-PR25, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and T-test were used for statistical analysis. Results Between June 2015 and November 2023, 56 patients with 85 lesions were treated at our institution. Median follow-up was 30 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 24-33.6]. Prostatectomy was the radical treatment in 85.7% of patients, and radiotherapy in 14.3%. Response rates were 67.1% for complete response, 27.4% for partial response, and 1.4% for stable disease. In-field progression was observed in only 3 lesions (3.5%). The median time to biochemical relapse post-SABR was 15 months (95% CI: 11.4-18.6). Three-year pelvic nodal and distant progression-free survival were 62.5% and 80%, respectively. There was a significant decrease in PSA levels after SABR compared to pretreatment levels (0.77 vs. 2.16 ng/mL respectively, p = 0.001). No grade ≥ 2 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities. The median global health status score was 83.33 points at both time points analysed. Conclusion SABR can delay the ADT and provide excellent local control while preserving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Lopez-Valcarcel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco J Valcarcel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Velasco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irma Zapata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Rodriguez
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Cardona
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Gil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofia Cordoba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Benlloch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofia Santana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina De la Fuente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Isabel Garcia-Berrocal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Regueiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schweiger L, Maurer T, Simon R, Horn T, Heck M, Weber WA, Eiber M, Rauscher I. Pattern of Failure in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After PSMA Radioguided Surgery. J Nucl Med 2024:jnumed.124.268151. [PMID: 39327015 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) is evolving as a new treatment modality for patients with early biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and disease limited to locoregional lymph nodes on PSMA-ligand PET/CT. Nevertheless, the pattern of failure (locoregional vs. systemic) after PSMA RGS remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the pattern of disease using PSMA-ligand PET in patients experiencing relapse after PSMA RGS. Methods: We evaluated 100 patients with biochemical recurrence after previous PET-guided PSMA RGS who underwent PSMA-ligand PET (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA], 0.9 ng/mL; range, 0.2-14.2 ng/mL). All suspicious lesions for recurrent prostate cancer were grouped according to the molecular imaging TNM classification system. Detection rates and lesion localization were determined and stratified by PSA values and the International Society of Urological Pathology grade group. Further, lesion localization was compared before and after PSMA RGS. Results: The median time between PSMA RGS and PSMA-ligand PET for relapse was 11.4 mo (range, 5.5-25.6 mo). In total, 91 of 100 (91%) patients showed PSMA-ligand-positive findings. PSMA PET detection rates were 82.6%, 92.6%, 91.3%, and 96.3% for PSA levels of 0.2-0.49, 0.5-0.99, 1-1.99, and at least 2 ng/mL, respectively. More than half of the patients (53%; 48/91) showed local recurrence or pelvic lymph node metastases only. Extrapelvic lymph node metastases, bone metastases, and visceral metastases were present in 22% (20/91), 16% (15/91), and 9% (8/91) of the patients, respectively. With increasing International Society of Urological Pathology grade group, the percentage of patients with bone and visceral metastases increased, whereas the number of patients with only locoregional disease decreased. Conclusion: PSMA-ligand PET is a useful method to detect and localize recurrent disease in patients with biochemical failure after PSMA RGS, with more than half of the patients presenting with locoregional recurrence, offering the potential for a second local therapy (e.g., radiation therapy or repeated surgery).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilit Schweiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ricarda Simon
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Horn
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Heck
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferro M, Macchia G, Pezzulla D, Cilla S, Romano C, Ferro M, Boccardi M, Bonome P, Picardi V, Buwenge M, Morganti AG, Deodato F. Pattern of recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy of nodal lesions: a single-institution analysis. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1295-1301. [PMID: 38741392 PMCID: PMC11186556 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and/or single fraction stereotactic body radiosurgery (SRS) are effective treatment options for the treatment of oligometastatic disease of lymph nodes. Despite the encouraging local control rate, progression-free survival remains unfair due to relapses that might occur in the same district or at other sites. The recurrence pattern analysis after nodal local ablative RT (laRT) in oligometastatic patients is presented in this study. METHODS The pattern of failure of patients with nodal metastases who were recruited and treated with SBRT in the Destroy-1 or SRS in the Destroy-2 trials was investigated in this single-institution, retrospective analysis. The different relapsed sites following laRT were recorded. RESULTS Data on 190 patients who received SBRT or SRS on 269 nodal lesions were reviewed. A relapse rate of 57.2% (154 out of 269 nodal lesions) was registered. The pattern of failure was distant in 88 (57.4%) and loco-regional in 66 (42.6%) patients, respectively. The most frequent primary malignancies among patients experiencing loco-regional failure were genitourinary and gynaecological cancers. Furthermore, the predominant site of loco-regional relapse (62%) was the pelvic area. Only 26% of locoregional relapses occurred contra laterally, with 74% occurring ipsilaterally. CONCLUSIONS The recurrence rates after laRT for nodal disease were more frequent in distant regions compared to locoregional sites. The most common scenarios for locoregional relapse appear to be genitourinary cancer and the pelvic site. In addition, recurrences often occur in the same nodal station or in a nodal station contiguous to the irradiated nodal site. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Local ablative radiotherapy is an effective treatment in managing nodal oligometastasis. Despite the high local control rate, the progression free survival remains dismal with recurrences that can occur both loco-regionally or at distance. To understand the pattern of failure could aid the physicians to choose the best treatment strategy. This is the first study that reports the recurrence pattern of a significant number of nodal lesions treated with laRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Marica Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Mariangela Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine—DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso 86100, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoo GS, Park S, Rim CH, Cho WK, Chang AR, Kim YS, Ahn YC, Chie EK. Radiation Oncologists' Perspectives on Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Survey from Korean Oligometastasis Working Group. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3239-3251. [PMID: 38920729 PMCID: PMC11203304 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in the oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is increasing, and various clinical studies have reported the benefits of metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT) in OMPC. However, the recognition regarding the adopted definitions, methodologies of assessment, and therapeutic approaches is diverse among radiation oncologists. This study aims to evaluate the level of agreement for issues in OMPC among radiation oncologists. METHODS We generated 15 key questions (KQs) for OMPC relevant to definition, diagnosis, local therapies, and endpoints. Additionally, three clinical scenarios representing synchronous metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) (case 1), metachronous mPC with visceral metastasis (case 2), and metachronous mPC with castration-resistance and history of polymetastasis (case 3) were developed. The 15 KQs were adapted according to each scenario and transformed into 23 questions with 6-9 per scenario. The survey was distributed to 80 radiation oncologists throughout the Republic of Korea. Answer options with 0.0-29.9%, 30-49.9%, 50-69.9%, 70-79.9%, 80-89.9%, and 90-100% agreements were considered as no, minimal, weak, moderate, strong, and near perfect agreement, respectively. RESULTS Forty-five candidates voluntarily participated in this study. Among 23 questions, near perfect (n = 4), strong (n = 3), or moderate (n = 2) agreements were shown in nine. For the case recognized as OMPC with agreements of 93% (case 1), near perfect agreements on the application of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for whole metastatic lesions were achieved. While ≥70% agreements regarding optimal dose-fractionation for metastasis-directed RT (MDRT) has not been achieved, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is favored by clinicians with higher clinical volume. CONCLUSION For the case recognized as OMPC, near perfect agreement for the application of definitive RT for whole metastatic lesions was reached. SBRT was more favored as a MDRT by clinicians with a higher clinical volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunmin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul 15355, Republic of Korea
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul 15355, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Kyung Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Cyberknife Center, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University School of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pastorello E, Nicosia L, Triggiani L, Frassine F, Vitali P, Salah El Din Tantawy E, Santoro V, Rigo M, Gaito S, Mazzarotto R, Buglione di Monale e Bastia M, Alongi F. SBRT in Lymph-Nodal Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer: Different Outcomes between Pelvic and Para-Aortic Disease. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3291. [PMID: 38893002 PMCID: PMC11173227 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Lymph-nodal prostate cancer oligometastases are differently treated according to their site: pelvic are locoregional lymph nodes; instead, para-aortic lymph nodes are considered as distant metastases. The aim of the study was a comparison between para-aortic and pelvic oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis. De novo metastatic or extra-nodal disease were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed; the pattern of recurrence was also evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable cohorts. The primary end-point was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), ADT-free survival (ADTFS), polymetastases-free survival (PMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and pattern of relapse. Results: In total, 240 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 164 patients (127 pelvic and 37 para-aortic) were treated. The median PFS was 20 and 11 months in pelvic and para-aortic patients, respectively (p = 0.042). The difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The median BRFS was 16 and 9 months, respectively, in the pelvic and para-aortic group (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences for ADTFS or PMFS were detected. The cumulative 5-year LPFS was 90.5%. In PSM, no statistically significant differences for all the study end-points were detected. Conclusions: Patients affected by para-aortic disease might have a PFS comparable to pelvic disease; local control is high in both cohorts. Our results also support the use of SBRT for para-aortic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Pastorello
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar, Italy; (E.P.)
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar, Italy; (E.P.)
| | | | | | - Paola Vitali
- University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy (F.F.)
| | | | - Valeria Santoro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar, Italy; (E.P.)
| | - Simona Gaito
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- Division of Medical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), 37126 Verona, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar, Italy; (E.P.)
- University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy (F.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmadsei M, Jegarajah V, Dal Bello R, Christ SM, Mayinger MM, Sabrina Stark L, Willmann J, Vogelius IR, Balermpas P, Andratschke N, Tanadini-Lang S, Guckenberger M. Dosimetric Analysis of Proximal Bronchial Tree Subsegments to Assess The Risk of Severe Toxicity After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Ultra-central Lung Tumors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100707. [PMID: 38125648 PMCID: PMC10731610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
•Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultra-central lung tumors is associated with high toxicity rates.•To evaluate differences in radiosensitivity within the proximal bronchial tree (PBT), the PBT was sub-segmented into seven anatomical sections.•A risk-adapted SBRT regimen of EQD2_10 = 54.4 Gy in 8 or 10 fractions results in excellent local control and low rates of severe toxicity.•Data from a recent meta-analysis, the NORDIC Hilus trial and dosimetric data from this study were combined to create a NTCP model.•A dose threshold of EQD2_3 = 100 Gy to the PBT or any of its subsegments is expected to result in low rates of severe bronchial toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiwand Ahmadsei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vinojaa Jegarajah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Riccardo Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian M. Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael M. Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luisa Sabrina Stark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ivan R. Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rossebo AE, Zlevor AM, Knott EA, Mao L, Couillard AB, Ziemlewicz TJ, Hinshaw JL, Abel EJ, Lubner MG, Knavel Koepsel EM, Wells SA, Stratchko LM, Laeseke PF, Lee FT. Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Retroperitoneal Tumors. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230080. [PMID: 38334471 PMCID: PMC10988338 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To determine if microwave ablation (MWA) of retroperitoneal tumors can safely provide high rates of local tumor control. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 19 patients (median age, 65 years [range = 46-78 years]; 13 [68.4%] men and six [31.6%] women) with 29 retroperitoneal tumors treated over 22 MWA procedures. Hydrodissection (0.9% saline with 2% iohexol) was injected in 17 of 22 (77.3%) procedures to protect nontarget anatomy. The primary outcomes evaluated were local tumor progression (LTP) and complication rates. Oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-free interval (TFI), were examined as secondary outcome measures. Results Median follow-up was 18 months (range = 0.5-113). Hydrodissection was successful in displacing nontarget anatomy in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. The LTP rate was 3.4% (one of 29; 95% CI: 0.1, 17.8) per tumor and 5.3% (one of 19; 95% CI: 0.1, 26.0) per patient. The overall complication rate per patient was 15.8% (three of 19), including two minor complications and one major complication. The OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, with a median OS estimated at greater than 7 years. There was no evidence of a difference in OS (P = .34) and PFS (P = .56) between patients with renal cell carcinoma (six of 19 [31.6%]) versus other tumors (13 of 19 [68.4%]) and patients treated with no evidence of disease (15 of 22 [68.2%]) versus patients with residual tumors (seven of 22 [31.8%]). Median TFI was 18 months (range = 0.5-108). Conclusion Treatment of retroperitoneal tumors with MWA combined with hydrodissection provided high rates of local control, prolonged systemic therapy-free intervals, and few serious complications. Keywords: Ablation Techniques (ie, Radiofrequency, Thermal, Chemical), Retroperitoneum, Microwave Ablation, Hydrodissection © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika E. Rossebo
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Annie M. Zlevor
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Emily A. Knott
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Lu Mao
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Allison B. Couillard
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Timothy J. Ziemlewicz
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - J. Louis Hinshaw
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - E. Jason Abel
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Meghan G. Lubner
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Erica M. Knavel Koepsel
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Shane A. Wells
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Lindsay M. Stratchko
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Paul F. Laeseke
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Fred T. Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wenzel M, Garcia CC, Hoeh B, Jorias C, Humke C, Koll F, Tselis N, Rödel C, Graefen M, Tilki D, Chun FKH, Mandel P. Real-world evidence of outcomes of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with metastasis-directed therapy. Prostate 2023; 83:1365-1372. [PMID: 37464963 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate characteristics and outcomes of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients undergoing metastases-directed therapy (MDT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify mHSPC patients who underwent EBRT as MDT between 12/2019 and 12/2022. Main outcomes consisted of progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and overall mortality (OM). Oligometastatic was defined as ≤3 metastases and bone and/or lymph node deposits were treated with conventional doses up to 54 Gy or with hypofractionated stereotactic regimes of median 24 Gy (20-27 Gy). RESULTS Overall, 37 patients treated with EBRT as MDT were identified. The median follow-up was 13 months. Median age at MDT was 71 years and 84% exhibited ECOG performance status 0. The median baseline PSA at diagnosis was 10 ng/mL. Overall, primary local therapy consisted of radical prostatectomy (65%), followed by external beam radiation therapy to the prostate (11%), focal therapy (8%), and palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (5%). Overall, 32% exhibited de novo oligometastatic mHSPC. Bone metastases were present in 78% versus 19% lymph node metastases versus 3% both. The distribution of targeted oligo-metastases was 62% versus 38% for respectively one metastasis versus more than one metastasis. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was combined with MDT in 84%. Moreover, 19% received combination therapy with apalutamide/enzalutamide and 12% with abiraterone or docetaxel. The median time to mCRPC was 50 months. In incidence analyses, 13% developed mCRPC after 24 months. OM after 24 months was 15% in mHSPC patients receiving MDT. Significant OM differences were observed after stratification into targeted metastatic burden (<0.05). No high-grade adverse events were recorded during MDT. CONCLUSION Our real-world data suggest that MDT represents a safe treatment option for well-selected oligometastatic mHSPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Cristina C Garcia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Charlotte Jorias
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Clara Humke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Florestan Koll
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tselis
- Department of Radiation and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hayek OE, Rais-Bahrami S, McDonald A, Galgano SJ. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Salvage for Lymph Node Recurrent Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET Imaging. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:471-476. [PMID: 37395949 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01174-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our understanding of patterns of prostate cancer recurrence after primary treatment of localized disease has significantly evolved since the development of positron emission tomography (PET) agents targeting prostate cancer. Previously, most biochemical recurrences were not associated with imaging correlates when restaging with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or bone scintigraphy and, hence, were typically assumed to represent occult metastases. A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after previous local therapy prompting a PET scan showing uptake limited to regional lymph nodes is an increasingly common clinical scenario as advanced prostate cancer imaging becomes more widely utilized. The optimal management strategy for patients who have lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is both unclear and evolving, particularly in terms of local and regionally directed therapies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilizes ablative radiation doses with steep gradients to achieve local tumor control while sparing nearby normal tissues. SBRT is an attractive therapeutic modality due to its efficacy, favorable toxicity profile, and flexibility to administer elective doses to areas of potential occult involvement. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe how SBRT is being implemented in the era of PSMA PET for the management of solely lymph node recurrent prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS SBRT has been shown to effectively control individual lymph node tumor deposits within the pelvis and retroperitoneum for prostate cancer and is well-tolerated with a favorable toxicity profile. However, a major limitation thus far has been the lack of prospective trials supporting the use of SBRT for oligometastatic nodal recurrent prostate cancer. As further trials are conducted, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of recurrent prostate cancer will be better established. Although PET-guided SBRT appears feasible and potentially beneficial, there is still considerable uncertainty about the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in patients with nodal recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer. PSMA PET has undoubtedly advanced imaging of recurrent prostate cancer, revealing anatomic correlates for disease recurrence that previously went undetected. At the same time, SBRT continues to be explored in prostate cancer with feasibility, a favorable risk profile, and satisfactory oncologic outcomes. However, much of the existing literature comes from the pre-PSMA PET era and integration of this novel imaging approach has led to greater focus on new and ongoing clinical trials to rigorously evaluate this approach and compare to other established treatment modalities utilized for oligometastatic, nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar E Hayek
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA
| | - Andrew McDonald
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cuccia F, Tamburo M, Piras A, Mortellaro G, Iudica A, Daidone A, Federico M, Zagardo V, Ferini G, Marletta F, Spatola C, Fazio I, Filosto S, Pergolizzi S, Ferrera G. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lymph-Nodal Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Experience. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1442. [PMID: 37629732 PMCID: PMC10456704 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Background: The favorable role of SBRT for lymph-nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer has been reported by several retrospective and prospective experiences, suggesting a more indolent natural history of disease when compared to patients with bone oligometastases. This retrospective multicenter study evaluates the outcomes of a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph-nodal oligometastases. Methods: Inclusion criteria were up to five lymph-nodal oligometastases detected either with Choline-PET or PSMA-PET in patients naïve for ADT or already ongoing with systemic therapy and at least 6 Gy per fraction for SBRT. Only patients with exclusive lymph-nodal disease were included. The primary endpoint of the study was LC; a toxicity assessment was retrospectively performed following CTCAE v4.0. Results: A total of 100 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 69 patients have been treated with SBRT between April 2015 and November 2022. The median age was 73 years (range, 60-85). Oligometastatic disease was mainly detected with Choline-PET in 47 cases, while the remaining were diagnosed using PSMA-PET, with most of the patients treated to a single lymph-nodal metastasis (48/69 cases), two in 14 cases, and three in the remaining cases. The median PSA prior to SBRT was 1.35 ng/mL (range, 0.3-23.7 ng/mL). Patients received SBRT with a median total dose of 35 Gy (range, 30-40 Gy) in a median number of 5 (range, 3-6) fractions. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 7-59 months), our LC rates were 95.8% and 86.3% at 1 and 2 years. DPFS rates were 90.4% and 53.4%, respectively, at 1 and 2 years, with nine patients developing a sequential oligometastatic disease treated with a second course of SBRT. Polymetastatic disease-free survival (PMFS) at 1 and 2 years was 98% and 96%. Six patients needed ADT after SBRT for a median time of ADT-free survival of 15 months (range, 6-22 months). The median OS was 16 months (range, 7-59) with 1- and 2-year rates of both 98%. In multivariate analysis, higher LC rates and the use of PSMA-PET were related to improved DPFS rates, and OS was significantly related to a lower incidence of distant progression. No G3 or higher adverse events were reported. Conclusions: In our experience, lymph-nodal SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer is a safe and effective option for ADT delay with no severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (G.M.)
| | - Maria Tamburo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95100 Catania, Italy; (M.T.)
| | - Antonio Piras
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (A.P.); (A.D.)
- RI.MED Foundation, 90100 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Arianna Iudica
- Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Policlinico-VE, 95100 Catania, Italy; (A.I.); (C.S.)
| | - Antonino Daidone
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (A.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Manuela Federico
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (M.F.); (I.F.)
| | - Valentina Zagardo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, REM Radioterapia, 95100 Viagrande, CT, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ferini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, REM Radioterapia, 95100 Viagrande, CT, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Spatola
- Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Policlinico-VE, 95100 Catania, Italy; (A.I.); (C.S.)
| | - Ivan Fazio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (M.F.); (I.F.)
| | - Sergio Filosto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, La Maddalena Dipartimento Oncologico di III Livello, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Department of Radiological Science, University of Messina, 98121 Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Caivano D, Bonome P, Pezzulla D, Rotondi M, Sigillo RC, De Sanctis V, Valeriani M, Osti MF. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of lymph node metastases: a retrospective mono-institutional study in a large cohort of patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1163213. [PMID: 37601675 PMCID: PMC10435736 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1163213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lymph node metastases (NMs) are a common site of tumor spread that can occur at different times of the disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be a therapeutic option for the treatment of NMs in the setting of oligometastatic disease (OMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate as primary end points the local control (LC) and secondary end points the locoregional nodal control (LRNC), distant nodal control (DNC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and concurrently to assess the predictive factors of response. Methods This is a retrospective study that analyzes a group of patients treated with SBRT on NMs from different primary tumors, with a of maximum five metastasis. Treated lesions were divided into four groups: oligometastatics, oligorecurrents, oligoprogressives, and oligopersistents. Results From 2007 to 2021, 229 NMs were treated in 174 patients with different primary tumor. The schedule most represented was 30 Gy in five fractions. The LC was obtained in 90% of NMs treated by SBRT with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 93%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. The LRNC was reached in 84% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 88%, 83%, and 77%, respectively. The DNC was obtained in 87% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 92%, 82%, and 78%, respectively. The DMFS was obtained in 38% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 57%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. The rate of PFS were 44%, 23%, and 13% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of OS were 78%, 48%, and 36%, respectively. Conclusion SBRT is an option for the treatment of NMS, with high rates of LC, improving survival, and with a good safety and tolerance. Tumor volume, tumor burden, lesion site, and doses can be predictive factors of response; however, multi-institutional studies with a greater number of patients could be helpful to better select patients and understand the right integrations between ablative treatment and systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatella Caivano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine - Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Radiotherapy, Santa Maria Goretti Hospita, Latina, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Margherita Rotondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Carlo Sigillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Valeriani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Regnery S, Leiner L, Buchele C, Hoegen P, Sandrini E, Held T, Deng M, Eichkorn T, Rippke C, Renkamp CK, König L, Lang K, Adeberg S, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Comparison of different dose accumulation strategies to estimate organ doses after stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:92. [PMID: 37248504 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02284-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Re-irradiation is frequently performed in the era of precision oncology, but previous doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) must be assessed to avoid cumulative overdoses. Stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) enables highly precise ablation of tumors close to OAR. However, OAR doses may change considerably during adaptive treatment, which complicates potential re-irradiation. We aimed to compare the baseline plan with different dose accumulation techniques to inform re-irradiation. PATIENTS & METHODS We analyzed 18 patients who received SMART to lung or liver tumors inside prospective databases. Cumulative doses were calculated inside the planning target volumes (PTV) and OAR for the adapted plans and theoretical non-adapted plans via (1) cumulative dose volume histograms (DVH sum plan) and (2) deformable image registration (DIR)-based dose accumulation to planning images (DIR sum plan). We compared cumulative dose parameters between the baseline plan, DVH sum plan and DIR sum plan using equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). RESULTS Individual patients presented relevant increases of near-maximum doses inside the proximal bronchial tree, spinal cord, heart and gastrointestinal OAR when comparing adaptive treatment to the baseline plans. The spinal cord near-maximum doses were significantly increased in the liver patients (D2% median: baseline 6.1 Gy, DIR sum 8.1 Gy, DVH sum 8.4 Gy, p = 0.04; D0.1 cm³ median: baseline 6.1 Gy, DIR sum 8.1 Gy, DVH sum 8.5 Gy, p = 0.04). Three OAR overdoses occurred during adaptive treatment (DIR sum: 1, DVH sum: 2), and four more intense OAR overdoses would have occurred during non-adaptive treatment (DIR sum: 4, DVH sum: 3). Adaptive treatment maintained similar PTV coverages to the baseline plans, while non-adaptive treatment yielded significantly worse PTV coverages in the lung (D95% median: baseline 86.4 Gy, DIR sum 82.4 Gy, DVH sum 82.2 Gy, p = 0.006) and liver patients (D95% median: baseline 87.4 Gy, DIR sum 82.1 Gy, DVH sum 81.1 Gy, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION OAR doses can increase during SMART, so that re-irradiation should be planned based on dose accumulations of the adapted plans instead of the baseline plan. Cumulative dose volume histograms represent a simple and conservative dose accumulation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Leiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen JJ, Weg E, Liao JJ. Prostate and metastasis-directed focal therapy in prostate cancer: hype or hope? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:163-176. [PMID: 36718727 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2171991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The paradigm of focal therapy's role in metastatic patients is being challenged by evolving attitudes and emerging data. At the current time, specifically regarding prostate cancer, does the evidence indicate this is more hype or hope? AREAS COVERED We searched the literature via PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies from 2014 to the present addressing focal therapy with non-palliative intent in metastatic prostate cancer patients, emphasizing prospective trials when available. We sought to address all common clinical scenarios: de novo synchronous diagnosis, oligorecurrence, oligoprogression, and mCRPC disease. EXPERT OPINION Current evidence is strongest, and in our opinion practice-changing, for prostate-directed RT in de novo metastatic patients with low metastatic burden. Metastasis-directed therapy with SBRT is consistently shown to have low rates of toxicity, and promising rates of ADT-free survival and progression-free survival. These can be utilized on a patient-by-patient basis with these endpoints in mind, but do not yet show sufficient benefit to be standard of care. This is a rich area of ongoing research, and many trials should publish in the coming years to shed light on many unanswered questions, including the role of cytoreductive prostatectomy, systemic therapy combined with MDT, and the integration of modern PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Detti B, Carnevale MG, Lucidi S, Burchini L, Caini S, Orsatti C, Bertini N, Roghi M, di Cataldo V, Fondelli S, Ingrosso G, Francolini G, Scartoni D, Sardaro A, Pisani A, Scoccianti S, Aristei C, Livi L. Choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1079808. [PMID: 37025599 PMCID: PMC10070677 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1079808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biochemical recurrence (BR) occurs in up to 40% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Choline PET/CT may show, in a single-step examination, the site of tumor recurrence earlier than traditional imaging methods, particularly at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, thus influencing subsequent treatment. Methods/patients Patients with recurrent and non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa), who were assessed with choline PET/CT, were included in the analysis. Based on imaging results, the following therapeutic strategies were chosen: radiotherapy to the prostatic bed, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to either the pelvic lymph nodes or distant metastases. We assessed the impact of age, PSA levels, Gleason score (GS), and adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes. Results Data from 410 consecutive nmPCa patients with BR who underwent RP as primary treatment were analyzed. One hundred seventy-six (42.9%) patients had a negative choline PET/CT, and 234 (57.1%) patients resulted positive. In the multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy and PSA at recurrence were significant independent prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). In the PET-positive subgroup, the number of relapses, PSA post-prostatectomy, and chemotherapy impacted on OS. PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) affected progression-free survival (PFS) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, GS, the number of relapse sites, and PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusion Choline PET/CT provides better accuracy than conventional imaging for the assessment of nmPCa with BR after prostatectomy, thereby enabling salvage strategies and improving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Carnevale
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Lucidi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Burchini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologia (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Carolina Orsatti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bertini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Manuele Roghi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Manuele Roghi,
| | - Vanessa di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Fondelli
- Struttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | | | | | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Struttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gamsiz H, Sager O, Uysal B, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Ozcan F, Colak O, Dirican B, Beyzadeoglu M. Outcomes of Sterotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for pelvic lymph node recurrences after adjuvant or primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:S851-S856. [PMID: 38384065 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1493_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data on the management of recurrent lymph nodes after primary or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we report our tertiary cancer center experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the management of pelvic lymph node recurrences after adjuvant or primary RT for PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent SBRT for pelvic lymph node metastases from PCa between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively assessed for local control (LC), androgen deprivation treatment-free survival (ADT-FS), and toxicity outcomes. The primary endpoint was LC and ADT-FS. The secondary endpoint was late treatment toxicity. RESULTS Twenty-two lesions of 18 patients receiving SBRT for pelvic lymph node recurrences for PCa between February 2013 and March 2019 were evaluated. At a median follow-up duration of 29.5 months (range: 9-54 months), LC was 95.5% vs. 90.2% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Ten patients received palliative ADT following SBRT after a median period of 14.5 months (range: 6-31 months). ADT-FS was 72.2% and 54.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Comparative analysis of biologically effective dose (BED) values revealed that higher BED10 values were associated with higher ADT-FS (P = 0.008). ADT-FS was 55.6% and 88.9% for BED10 <50 Gy and for BED10 >50 Gy, respectively (P = 0.008). Assessment of late toxicity outcomes revealed that the most common toxicity was urinary toxicity and fatigue; however, no patient had ≥ grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION Our tertiary cancer center experience confirms the safety and efficacy of SBRT for the management of pelvic lymph node recurrences from PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Gamsiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li M, Fan Y, Trapp C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Ma J, Buchner A, Lu S, Xu B, Stief C, Wang X, Zhou C, Belka C, Rogowski P. Elective nodal radiotherapy with a gapless radiation field junction for oligorecurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 39:100571. [PMID: 36605290 PMCID: PMC9807861 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of subsequent elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) for nodal recurrences after previous radiotherapy with a defined planning approach for a gapless radiation field junction. Methods Patients with 1) previous radiotherapy of prostate or prostatic fossa and subsequent pelvic ENRT or 2) previous pelvic radiotherapy and subsequent ENRT to paraaortic lymph nodes (LN) and gapless junction of both radiation fields were analyzed. The cumulative maximum dose (Dmax-cum) and the maximum cumulative dose in 1 cc (D1cc-cum) were estimated. Absolute toxicity and the toxicity exceeding baseline were evaluated. Results Twenty-two patients with PSMA-PET/CT-staged nodal oligorecurrence after prior radiotherapy were treated with pelvic (14 patients) or paraaortic ENRT (9 patients). One patient was treated sequentially at both locations. Median time between first and second RT was 20.2 months. Median doses to the lymphatic pathways and to PET-positive LN were 47.5 Gy and 64.8 Gy, respectively. The planning constraint of an estimated Dmax-cum ≤ 95 Gy and of D1cc-cum < 90 Gy were achieved in 23/23 cases and 22/23 cases, respectively. Median follow-up was 33.5 months. There was no additional acute or late toxicity ≥ grade 3. Worst acute toxicity exceeding baseline was grade 1 in 68.2% and grade 2 in 22.7% of patients. Worst late toxicity exceeding baseline was grade 1 in 31.8% and grade 2 in 18.2% of patients. Conclusion ENRT for nodal recurrences after a previous radiotherapy with gapless junction of radiation fields seems to be feasible, applying the dose constraints Dmax-cum ≤ 95 Gy and D1cc-cum < 90 Gy without grade 3 acute or late toxicities exceeding baseline.
Collapse
Key Words
- ADT, androgen deprivation therapy
- CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events
- CTV, clinical target volume
- D1cc-cum, maximum cumulative dose in 1 cc
- Dmax-cum, cumulative maximum dose
- ENRT
- ENRT, elective nodal radiotherapy
- EQD2, equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions
- Gapless radiation field junction
- IGRT, image-guided radiotherapy
- IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- LN, lymph nodes
- Nodal oligorecurrence
- OAR, organs at risk
- PSA, prostate-specific antigen
- PSMA-PET/CT
- PSMA-PET/CT, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography
- RT, radiotherapy
- Reirradiation
- SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy
- SIB, simultaneous integrated boost
- VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy
Collapse
|
20
|
Laughlin BS, Voss MM, Toesca DA, Daniels T, Golafshar MA, Keole SR, Wong WW, Rwigema JC, Davis B, Schild SE, Stish BJ, Choo R, Lester S, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Preliminary Analysis of a Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer With High-Risk Features After Radical Prostatectomy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101143. [PMID: 36845611 PMCID: PMC9943785 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are limited data regarding using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the postprostatectomy setting. Here, we present a preliminary analysis of a prospective phase II trial that aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of postprostatectomy SBRT for adjuvant or early salvage therapy. Materials and Methods Between May 2018 and May 2020, 41 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and were stratified into 3 groups: group I (adjuvant), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 0.2 ng/mL with high-risk features including positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, or extracapsular extension; group II (salvage), with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL but < 2 ng/mL; or group III (oligometastatic), with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL but < 2 ng/mL and up to 3 sites of nodal or bone metastases. Androgen deprivation therapy was not offered to group I. Androgen deprivation therapy was offered for 6 months for group II and 18 months for group III patients. SBRT dose to the prostate bed was 30 to 32 Gy in 5 fractions. Baseline-adjusted physician reported toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), patient reported quality-of-life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System), and American Urologic Association scores were evaluated for all patients. Results The median follow-up was 23 months (range, 10-37). SBRT was adjuvant in 8 (20%) patients, salvage in 28 (68%), and salvage with the presence of oligometastases in 5 (12%) patients. Urinary, bowel, and sexual quality of life domains remained high after SBRT. Patients tolerated SBRT with no grade 3 or higher (3+) gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities. The baseline adjusted acute and late toxicity grade 2 genitourinary (urinary incontinence) rate was 2.4% (1/41) and 12.2% (5/41). At 2 years, clinical disease control was 95%, and biochemical control was 73%. Among the 2 clinical failures, 1 was a regional node and the other a bone metastasis. Oligometastatic sites were salvaged successfully with SBRT. There were no in-target failures. Conclusions Postprostatectomy SBRT was very well tolerated in this prospective cohort, with no significant effect on quality of life metrics postirradiation, while providing excellent clinical disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Thomas Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona,Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, New York
| | | | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Brian Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Brad J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona,Corresponding author: Carlos E. Vargas, MD
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zamagni A, Bonetti M, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Galietta E, Strigari L, Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Cammelli S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic radiotherapy of nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer: a prisma-compliant systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:845-863. [PMID: 35980556 PMCID: PMC9637632 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastases-directed therapies can delay the initiation or switch of systemic treatments and allow local control (LC) and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with lymph nodes (LN) oligometastases. We performed a systematic review on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this setting. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS were selected. Data on ADT-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity were also collected from the selected studies. Fifteen studies were eligible (414 patients), 14 of them were retrospective analyses. A high heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient selection and treatment. In one study SBRT was delivered as a single 20 Gy fraction, while in the others the median total dose ranged between 24 and 40 Gy delivered in 3-6 fractions. LC and PFS were reported in 15 and 12 papers, respectively. LC was reported as a crude percentage in 13 studies, with 100% rate in seven and 63.2-98.0% in six reports. Five studies reported actuarial LC (2-year LC: 70.0-100%). PFS was reported as a crude rate in 11 studies (range 27.3-68.8%). Actuarial 2-year PFS was reported in four studies (range 30.0-50.0%). SBRT tolerability was excellent, with only two patients with grade 3 acute toxicity and two patients with grade 3 late toxicity. SBRT for LN oligorecurrences from PCa in safe and provides optimal LC. However, the long-term effect on PFS and OS is still unclear as well as which patients are the best candidate for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Zamagni
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mattia Bonetti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Erika Galietta
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nicosia L, Trapani G, Rigo M, Giaj-Levra N, Mazzola R, Pastorello E, Ricchetti F, Cuccia F, Figlia V, Fiorini M, Alongi F. 1.5 T MR-Guided Daily Adapted SBRT on Lymph Node Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226658. [PMID: 36431135 PMCID: PMC9697920 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a daily adaptive MR-guided SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac in patients affected by lymph node oligometastases from PCa. Materials and Methods: The present study is a prospective observational study conducted in a single institution (protocol n°: MRI/LINAC n. 23748). Patients with oligometastatic lymph nodes from PCa treated with daily adaptive MR-guided SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac were included in the study. There was a minimum required follow-up of 3 months after SBRT. The primary end-point was local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary end-points were: nodal progression-free survival (NPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 118 lymph node oligometastases from PCa were treated with daily adaptive 1.5 T MR-guided SBRT in 63 oligometastatic patients. Of the patients, 63.5% were oligorecurrent and 36.5% were oligoprogressive. The two-year LPFS was 90.7%. The median NPFS was 22.3 months and the 2-year NPFS was 46.5%. Receiving hormone therapy before SBRT was correlated with a lower NPFS at the multivariate analysis (1 y NPFS 87.1% versus 42.8%; p = 0.002-HR 0.199, 95% CI 0.073-0.549). Furthermore, the oligorecurrent state during ADT was correlated with a lower NPFS than was the oligoprogressive state. The median PFS was 10.3 months and the 2-year PFS was 32.4%. Patients treated with hormone therapy before SBRT had a significantly lower 1-year PFS the others (28% versus 70.4%; p = 0.01-HR 0.259, 95% CI 0.117-0.574). No acute and late toxicities occurred during treatment. Conclusions: The present study is the largest prospective study of 1.5 T lymph node SBRT on MR-linac in patients with PCa. Lymph node SBRT by 1.5 T MR-linac provides high local control rates with an excellent toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-045-6014800; Fax: +39-045-60148071
| | - Giovanna Trapani
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Edoardo Pastorello
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Matilde Fiorini
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- Clinical Research Unity, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zilli T, Achard V, Dal Pra A, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Lancia A, Ingrosso G, Alongi F, Aluwini S, Arcangeli S, Blanchard P, Conde Moreno A, Couñago F, Créhange G, Dirix P, Gomez Iturriaga A, Guckenberger M, Pasquier D, Sargos P, Scorsetti M, Supiot S, Tree AC, Zapatero A, Le Guevelou J, Ost P, Belka C. Recommendations for radiation therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: An ESTRO-ACROP Delphi consensus. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:199-207. [PMID: 36228761 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a new and emerging treatment field with only few prospective randomized studies published so far. Despite the lack of strong level I evidence, metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) are widely used in clinical practice, mainly based on retrospective and small phase 2 studies and with a large difference across centers. Pending results of ongoing prospective randomized trials, there is a clear need for more consistent treatment indications and radiotherapy practices. MATERIAL AND METHODS A European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee consisting of radiation oncologists' experts in prostate cancer was asked to answer a dedicated questionnaire, including 41 questions on the main controversial issues with regard to oligometastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS The panel achieved consensus on patient selection and routine use of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging as preferred staging and restaging imaging. MDT strategies are recommended in the de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease setting for nodal, bone and visceral metastases. Radiation therapy doses, volumes and techniques were discussed and commented. CONCLUSION These recommendations have the purpose of providing standardization and consensus to optimize the radiotherapy treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer until mature results of randomized trials are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonio Conde Moreno
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Castellón, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain; Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez Iturriaga
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Research Institute, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer Le Guevelou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA ziekenhuizen, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Arcos MBL, López-Campos F, Valcarcel ML, Rubio MG, de Manzanos IVF, Santana VD, Aparicio MG, Martin JZ, Kishan AU, Achard V, Siva S, Lorenzo FC. Oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Why radiotherapy? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:e93-e103. [PMID: 36456467 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
25
|
Pêtre A, Quivrin M, Briot N, Boustani J, Martin E, Bessieres I, Cochet A, Créhange G. Salvage involved-field and extended-field radiotherapy in PET-positive nodal recurrent prostate cancer: outcomes and patterns of failure. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101040. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
26
|
Completeness of reporting oligometastatic disease characteristics in literature and influence on oligometastatic disease classification using the ESTRO/EORTC nomenclature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:587-595. [PMID: 35738308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence for the integration of locally ablative therapy into multimodality treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD). To support standardised data collection, analysis, and comparison, a consensus OMD classification based on fundamental disease and treatment characteristics has previously been established. This study investigated the completeness of reporting the proposed OMD characteristics in literature and evaluated whether the proposed OMD classification system can be applied to the historical data. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, searching for prospective and retrospective studies, where SBRT was a treatment component of OMD. Reporting of the OMD characteristics as described in the EORTC/ESTRO classification was analyzed, feasibility to retrospectively classify the proposed OMD states was investigated and the impact of the categorisation on overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS Our study shows incomplete reporting of the proposed OMD characteristics. The most fully reported characteristic was 'type of involved organs' (88/95 studies); 'history of cancer progression' was the least reported (not mentioned in 50/95 studies). Retrospective OMD classification of existing literature was only possible for 7/95 studies. With respect to categorization as de novo, repeat or induced OMD, homogeneous patient cohorts were observed in 21/95 studies, most frequently de novo OMD, in 20 studies. Differences in OS at 2, 3, or 5 years were not statistically significant between the different states. OS was significantly influenced by primary tumor histology, with superior OS observed for prostate cancer and worst OS observed for non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION The largely incomplete reporting of the proposed OMD characteristics hampers a retrospective classification of existing literature. To facilitate future comparison of individual studies, as well as validation of the OMD classification, comprehensive reporting of OMD characteristics using standardised terminology is recommended, as proposed by the EORTC/ESTRO classification system and following ESTRO-ASTRO consensus.
Collapse
|
27
|
Stratification of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Patients by Liquid Biopsy: Clinical Insights from a Pilot Study. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061321. [PMID: 35740343 PMCID: PMC9219949 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We propose a pilot, prospective, translational study with the aim of identifying possible molecular markers underlying metastatic prostate cancer (PC) evolution with the use of liquid biopsy. Twenty-eight castrate sensitive, oligometastatic PC patients undergoing bone and/or nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were recruited. Peripheral blood samples were collected before the commencement of SBRT, then they were processed for circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) extraction. Deep targeted sequencing was performed using a custom gene panel. The primary endpoint was to identify differences in the molecular contribution between the oligometastatic and polymetastatic evolution of PC to same-first oligo-recurrent disease presentation. Seventy-seven mutations were detected in 25/28 cfDNA samples: ATM in 14 (50%) cases, BRCA2 11 (39%), BRCA1 6 (21%), AR 13 (46%), ETV4, and ETV6 2 (7%). SBRT failure was associated with an increased risk of harboring the BRCA1 mutation (OR 10.5) (p = 0.043). The median cfDNA concentration was 24.02 ng/mL for ATM mutation carriers vs. 40.04 ng/mL for non-carriers (p = 0.039). Real-time molecular characterization of oligometastatic PC may allow for the identification of a true oligometastatic phenotype, with a stable disease over a long time being more likely to benefit from local, curative treatments or the achievement of long-term disease control. A prospective validation of our promising findings is desirable for a better understanding of the real impact of liquid biopsy in detecting tumor aggressiveness and clonal evolution.
Collapse
|
28
|
Rich BJ, Montoya C, Jin WH, Spieler BO, Mahal BA, Delgadillo R, Bilusic M, Abramowitz MC, Pollack A, Pra AD. Para-Aortic Radiation Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:718-724. [PMID: 35671868 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oligorecurrent prostate cancer limited to the pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) can be treated with whole pelvis radiotherapy. Radiotherapy may also be beneficial for oligorecurrent prostate cancer in the para-aortic (PA) LNs. METHODS We identified a sequential cohort of patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer to the PA LNs (≤5) treated with elective, conventionally fractionated PA radiotherapy (PA-RT) plus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to LN+ disease at our institution from 2015 to 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years using Kaplan-Meier estimation. PFS was defined as the time from PA-RT to the first event: biochemical failure (PSA 50% above post-treatment nadir and at least 4 ng/mL), escalation of therapy, radiological progression, or death. Secondary endpoints included 2-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), 2-year overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were included (median age 66 years), and 82.4% were status post-prostatectomy. The median time from diagnosis to PA-RT was 5.7 years. The median PSA at PA-RT was 3.15 ng/mL (IQR 1.30-5.90). All patients were treated to the PA region with 45-50 Gy in 25 daily fractions. LN+ disease received a SIB to a median dose of 62.5 Gy (range 60-65 Gy). Most received photon-based RT, while 21.1% were treated with proton therapy. Nearly all (97.1%) patients had androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and 52.9% abiraterone. The median follow-up time from PA-RT was 21.5 months. PFS at 2-years was 83.4% (95% CI: 68.6-100%). Two-year BFFS was 90.4% and OS 100%. There were no grade 3 or higher acute toxicities. There were 10 (29.4%) grade 2 acute toxicities. There were two (5.9%) grade 3 chronic toxicities and 4 (11.8%) chronic grade 2 toxicities. CONCLUSION PA-RT for oligorecurrent prostate cancer has low toxicity with very encouraging early disease control. These preliminary results require validation in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J Rich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
| | - Chris Montoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - William H Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Benjamin O Spieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Rodrigo Delgadillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Marijo Bilusic
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Matthew C Abramowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Oligorecurrent/Oligoprogressive Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112680. [PMID: 35681659 PMCID: PMC9179886 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This paper is a review of the literature on oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastasis treated with SBRT. The use of mediastinal SBRT had historically been not feasible in view of the expected toxicity due to the proximity of critical structures such as the airways and esophagus. Despite the heterogeneity and lack of some data in the studies analyzed, this literature review is the first published and can be a valid guide for the radiotherapist in the management of oligometastatic/oligoprogressive patients, with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Abstract Introduction: Mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastases are a challenging condition in patients affected by solid tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could play a crucial role in the therapeutic management and in the so-called “no-fly zone”, delivering high doses of radiation in relatively few treatment fractions with excellent sparing of healthy surrounding tissues and low toxicity. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SBRT in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lesions with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: Two blinded investigators performed a critical review of the Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA), starting from a specific question: What is the clinical impact of SBRT for the treatment of oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar metastasis? All retrospective and prospective clinical trials published in English up to February 2022 were analyzed. Results: A total of 552 articles were identified and 12 of them were selected with a total number of 478 patients treated with SBRT for mediastinal or hilar node recurrence. All the studies are retrospective, published between 2015 and 2021 with a median follow-up ranging from 12 to 42.2 months. Studies following SBRT for lung lesions or retreatments after thorax radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer were also included. The studies showed extensive heterogeneity in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequently reported histology. Different dose schemes were used, with a higher prevalence of 4–8 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions, but dose escalation was also used up to 52 Gy in 4 fractions with dose constraints mainly derived from RTOG 0813 trial. The radiotherapy technique most frequently used was volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a median PTV volume ranging from 7 to 25.7 cc. The clinical outcome seems to be very encouraging with 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 84 to 94%, 53 to 88% and 23 to 53.9%, respectively. Half of the studies did not report toxicity greater than G3 and only five cases of fatal toxicity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: From the present review, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions because of the heterogeneity of the studies analyzed. However, SBRT appears to be a safe and effective option in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lymph node recurrence, with a good toxicity profile. Its use in clinical practice is still limited, and there is extensive heterogeneity in patient selection and fractionation schedules. Good performance status, small PTV volume, absence of previous thoracic irradiation, and administration of a high biologically effective dose (BED) seem to be factors that correlate with greater local control and better survival rates. In the presence of symptoms related to the thoracic lymph nodes, SBRT determines a rapid control that lasts over time. We look forward to the prospective studies that are underway for definitive conclusions.
Collapse
|
30
|
Shenker RF, Price JG, Jacobs CD, Palta M, Czito BG, Mowery YM, Kirkpatrick JP, Boyer MJ, Oyekunle T, Niedzwiecki D, Song H, Salama JK. Comparing Outcomes of Oligometastases Treated with Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiotherapy (HIGRT) with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Technique versus Metastasis Alone: A Multi-Institutional Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102403. [PMID: 35626008 PMCID: PMC9139819 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT) is a common method in which high doses of radiation are delivered to treat oligometastatic disease. We have previously reported on the clinical outcomes of treating oligometastases with radiation using an elective simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB), delivering higher doses to known metastases and reduced doses to adjacent bone or nodal basins. Here we compare outcomes of oligometastases receiving radiation targeting metastases alone (MA) versus those treated via an SIB. Both SIB and MA irradiation of oligometastases achieved high rates of tumor metastases control and similar pain control. Further investigation of this technique with prospective trials is warranted. Abstract Purpose: We previously reported on the clinical outcomes of treating oligometastases with radiation using an elective simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB), delivering higher doses to known metastases and reduced doses to adjacent bone or nodal basins. Here we compare outcomes of oligometastases receiving radiation targeting metastases alone (MA) versus those treated via an SIB. Methods: Oligometastatic patients with ≤5 active metastases treated with either SIB or MA radiation at two institutions from 2013 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively for treatment-related toxicity, pain control, and recurrence patterns. Tumor metastasis control (TMC) was defined as an absence of progression in the high dose planning target volume (PTV). Marginal recurrence (MR) was defined as recurrence outside the elective PTV but within the adjacent bone or nodal basin. Distant recurrence (DR) was defined as any recurrence that is not within the PTV or surrounding bone or nodal basin. The outcome rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between the two techniques using the log-rank test. Results: 101 patients were treated via an SIB to 90 sites (58% nodal and 42% osseous) and via MA radiation to 46 sites (22% nodal and 78% osseous). The median follow-up among surviving patients was 24.6 months (range 1.4–71.0). Of the patients treated to MA, the doses ranged from 18 Gy in one fraction (22%) to 50 Gy in 10 fractions (50%). Most patients treated with an SIB received 50 Gy to the treated metastases and 30 Gy to the elective PTV in 10 fractions (88%). No acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in either cohort. Late grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 3 SIB patients (vocal cord paralysis and two vertebral body compression), all related to the high dose PTV and not the elective volume. There was similar crude pain relief between cohorts. The MR-free survival rate at 2 years was 87% (95% CI: 70%, 95%) in the MA group and 98% (95% CI: 87%, 99%) in the SIB group (p = 0.07). The crude TMC was 89% (41/46) in the MA group and 94% (85/90) in the SIB group. There were no significant differences in DR-free survival (65% (95% CI: 55–74%; p = 0.24)), disease-free survival (60% (95% CI: 40–75%; p = 0.40)), or overall survival (88% (95% CI: 73–95%; p = 0.26)), between the MA and SIB cohorts. Conclusion: Both SIB and MA irradiation of oligometastases achieved high rates of TMC and similar pain control, with a trend towards improved MR-free survival for oligometastases treated with an SIB. Further investigation of this technique with prospective trials is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel F. Shenker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Jeremy G. Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Corbin D. Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Cancer Care Northwest, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814, USA
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Brian G. Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Matthew J. Boyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Radiation Oncology Service, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Taofik Oyekunle
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (T.O.); (D.N.)
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (T.O.); (D.N.)
| | - Haijun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Radiation Oncology Service, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Joseph K. Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Radiation Oncology Service, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +919-668-7339; Fax: +919-668-7345
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Pablos-Rodríguez P, la Rosa A, Rebez G, Mascarós Martínez JM, González Pérez V, Arribas Alpuente L, Rubio-Briones J, Ramírez-Backhaus M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metachronous oligorecurrent prostate cancer: A single-center experience. ACTAS UROLÓGICAS ESPAÑOLAS (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 46:238-244. [PMID: 35321821 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Metachronous oligorecurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) occurs in patients with localized disease who, after failed radical treatment, develop oligometastases. Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) aims to delay androgen deprivation therapy. In this study, we report our experience to elucidate the role of SBRT in a selected population of patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients treated with SBRT for oligorecurrent PCa between November 2015 and December 2020. We detailed clinicopathological characteristics at disease onset (age, PSA, stage, primary treatment), clinical scenario at diagnosis of oligorecurrence (PSA, PSA velocity, metastases characteristics), progression-free survival, castration resistance-free survival, dose, and toxicity of SBRT. RESULTS Thirty-eight SBRT treatments were applied to 13 lymph node and 25 bone metastases in a total of 28 patients. After a follow-up of 34.57 months (21.17-57.59), 17 patients had radiological progression of the disease and 11 presented castration resistant PCa. PFS and CRFS were 21.93 and 44.13 months, respectively. Only 2 patients presented grade 1 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS In patients with metachronous oligorecurrent PCa, SBRT constitutes a safe and effective treatment that allows delaying the onset of androgen deprivation therapy and the time to castration resistance, assuming low levels of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P de Pablos-Rodríguez
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.
| | - A la Rosa
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Rebez
- Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - V González Pérez
- Servicio de Radiofísica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Arribas Alpuente
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Rubio-Briones
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Ramírez-Backhaus
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Achard V, Jaccard M, Vanhoutte F, Siva S, Heikkilä R, Dirix P, Liefhooghe N, Otte FX, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Berghen C, Shelan M, Conde-Moreno A, Campos FL, Papachristofilou A, Guckenberger M, Meersschout S, Putora PM, Zwahlen D, Couñago F, Scorsetti M, Eito C, Barrado M, Zapatero A, Muto P, Van De Voorde L, Lamanna G, Koutsouvelis N, Dipasquale G, Ost P, Zilli T. Oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer: radiotherapy quality assurance of the randomized PEACE V-STORM phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:1-9. [PMID: 35476942 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this study is to report the results of the radiotherapy quality assurance program of the PEACE V-STORM randomized phase II trial for pelvic nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS A benchmark case (BC) consisting of a postoperative case with 2 nodal recurrences was used for both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT, 30 Gy/3 fx) and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT, 45 Gy/25 fx + SIB boost to 65 Gy). RESULTS BC of 24 centers were analyzed. The overall grading for delineation variation of the 1st BC was rated as 'UV' (Unacceptable Variation) or 'AV' (Acceptable Variation) for 1 and 7 centers for SBRT (33%), and 3 and 8 centers for WPRT (46%), respectively. An inadequate upper limit of the WPRT CTV (n=2), a missing delineation of the prostate bed (n=1), and a missing nodal target volume (n=1 for SBRT and WPRT) constituted the observed 'UV'. With the 2nd BC (n=11), the overall delineation review showed 2 and 8 'AV' for SBRT and WPRT, respectively, with no 'UV'. For the plan review of the 2nd BC, all treatment plans were per protocol for WPRT. SBRT plans showed variability in dose normalization (Median D90% = 30.1 Gy, range 22.9-33.2Gy and 30.6 Gy, range 26.8-34.2Gy for nodes 1 and 2 respectively). CONCLUSIONS Up to 46% of protocol deviations were observed in delineation of WPRT for nodal oligorecurrent PCa, while dosimetric results of SBRT showed the greatest disparities between centers. Repeated BC resulted in an improved adherence to the protocol, translating in an overall acceptable contouring and planning compliance rate among participating centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maud Jaccard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Vanhoutte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Reino Heikkilä
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium and University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nick Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - François-Xavier Otte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute and Hôpital Erasme, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital (Biocruces Health Research Institute), Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Conde-Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fernando López Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Quironsalud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Clara Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Oncólogico Clinica Universitaria IMQ, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marta Barrado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Muto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Napoli Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Lamanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Giovanna Dipasquale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human structure and repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pasqualetti F, Trippa F, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Colosimo C, Cantarella M, Mazzola R, Ingrosso G. Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases in the lymph nodes. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:46-51. [PMID: 35402021 PMCID: PMC8989441 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Even though systemic therapy is standard treatment for lymph node metastases, metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) seems to be a valid option in oligometastatic patients with a low disease burden. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT ) is the gold standard for assessing metastases to the lymph nodes; co-registration of PET-CT images and planning CT images are the basis for gross tumor volume (GTV ) delineation. Appropriate techniques are needed to overcome target motion. SRT schedules depend on the irradiation site, target volume and dose constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) of toxicity. Although several fractionation schemes were reported, total doses of 48–60 Gy in 4–8 fractions were proposed for mediastinal lymph node SRT, with the spinal cord, esophagus, heart and proximal bronchial tree being the dose limiting OAR s. Total doses ranged from 30 to 45 Gy, with daily fractions of 7–12 Gy for abdominal lymph nodes, with dose limiting OARs being the liver, kidneys, bowel and bladder. SRT on lymph node metastases is safe; late side effects, particularly severe, are rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pasqualetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Caterina Colosimo
- Operative Unit of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | | | - Rosario Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Higuchi R, Ono H, Matsuyama R, Takemura Y, Kobayashi S, Otsubo T, Abe Y, Endo I, Tanabe M, Yamamoto M. Examination of the characteristics of long-term survivors among patients with gallbladder cancer with liver metastasis who underwent surgical treatment: a retrospective multicenter study (ACRoS1406). BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:152. [PMID: 35346072 PMCID: PMC8962041 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gallbladder cancer (GBC) with liver metastasis is considered unresectable. However, there have been infrequent reports of long-term survival in patients with GBC and liver metastases. Therefore, we examined the characteristics of long-term survivors of gallbladder cancer with liver metastasis. Methods A retrospective multicenter study of 462 patients with GBC (mean age, 71 years; female, 51%) was performed. Although patients with pre-operatively diagnosed GBC and liver metastasis were generally excluded from resection, some cases identified during surgery were resected. Result In patients with resected stage III/IV GBC (n = 193), the period 2007–2013 (vs. 2000–2006, hazard ratio 0.63), pre-operative jaundice (hazard ratio 1.70), ≥ 2 liver metastases (vs. no liver metastasis, hazard ratio 2.11), and metastasis to the peritoneum (vs. no peritoneal metastasis, hazard ratio 2.08) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas one liver metastasis (vs. no liver metastasis) was not. When examining the 5-year overall survival and median survival times by liver metastasis in patients without peritoneal metastasis or pre-operative jaundice, those with one liver metastasis (63.5%, not reached) were comparable to those without liver metastasis (40.4%, 33.0 months), and was better than those with ≥ 2 liver metastases although there was no statistical difference (16.7%, 9.0 months). According to the univariate analysis of resected patients with GBC and liver metastases (n = 26), minor hepatectomy, less blood loss, less surgery time, papillary adenocarcinoma, and T2 were significantly associated with longer survival. Morbidity of Clavien–Dindo classification ≤ 2 and received adjuvant chemotherapy were marginally not significant. Long-term survivors (n = 5) had a high frequency of T2 tumors (4/5), had small liver metastases near the gallbladder during or after surgery, underwent minor hepatectomy without postoperative complications, and received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions Although there is no surgical indication for GBC with liver metastasis diagnosed pre-operatively, minor hepatectomy and postoperative chemotherapy may be an option for selected patients with T2 GBC and liver metastasis identified during or after surgery who do not have other poor prognostic factors. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02234-9.
Collapse
|
35
|
Regnery S, Buchele C, Piskorski L, Weykamp F, Held T, Eichkorn T, Rippke C, Katharina Renkamp C, Klüter S, Ristau J, König L, Koerber SA, Adeberg S, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. SMART ablation of lymphatic oligometastases in the pelvis and abdomen: Clinical and dosimetry outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:106-112. [PMID: 35121031 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate dosimetry benefits and report clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) of abdominopelvic lymphatic oligometastases. PATIENTS & METHODS Prospective registry data of 26 patients with 31 oligoprogressive lymphatic metastases (1 - 2 lesions) who received SMART between April 2020 and April 2021 was analyzed. Prostate cancer was the most common histology (69%). Most patients (63%) had received previous abdominopelvic radiotherapy (RT). SMART was delivered in 3 - 7 fractions based on planning target volume (PTV) location and previous dose exposures. For SMART, the baseline plan was recalculated on daily 3D MR-imaging (predicted plan), and plan adaptation was mandatory in case of planning objective violations. RESULTS Plan adaptation was mostly performed due to violation of planning objectives in the predicted plan (134/140 fractions, 96%) and significantly improved plan dosimetry: 1) PTV coverage was increased (predicted: median 89%, adapted: median 95%, p < 0.001), 2) organs-at-risk (OAR) overdoses were reduced (predicted: 27/140 (19%), adapted: 1/140 (1%), p < 0.001) and 3) PTV overdoses were reduced (predicted: 21/140 (15%), adapted: 1/140 (1%), p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 9.8 months, one patient had in-field tumor progression and twelve patients had out-field tumor progression (at 6 months: progression-free survival: 63% [46 - 88%], local control rate: 97% [90 - 100%]). Treatment was tolerated well and no grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION SMART improves target volume coverage and yields superior OAR protection compared to non-adaptive radiotherapy, thus representing an innovative approach to challenging cases, such as repeated radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Piskorski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
de Pablos-Rodríguez P, la Rosa de los Ríos A, Rebez G, Mascarós Martínez J, González Pérez V, Arribas Alpuente L, Rubio-Briones J, Ramírez-Backhaus M. Terapia de radiación corporal estereotáctica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata oligorrecurrente metacrónico. Experiencia de un centro. Actas Urol Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
37
|
le Guevelou J, Achard V, Mainta I, Zaidi H, Garibotto V, Latorzeff I, Sargos P, Ménard C, Zilli T. PET/CT-Based Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Impact on Treatment Management and Future Directions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:742093. [PMID: 34532294 PMCID: PMC8438304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.742093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence is a clinical situation experienced by 20 to 40% of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Prostate bed (PB) radiation therapy (RT) remains the mainstay salvage treatment, although it remains non-curative for up to 30% of patients developing further recurrence. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) using prostate cancer-targeting radiotracers has emerged in the last decade as a new-generation imaging technique characterized by a better restaging accuracy compared to conventional imaging. By adapting targeting of recurrence sites and modulating treatment management, implementation in clinical practice of restaging PET/CT is challenging the established therapeutic standards born from randomized controlled trials. This article reviews the potential impact of restaging PET/CT on changes in the management of recurrent prostate cancer after RP. Based on PET/CT findings, it addresses potential adaptation of RT target volumes and doses, as well as use of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the impact of such management changes on the oncological outcomes of PET/CT-based salvage RT strategies is as yet unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer le Guevelou
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Vérane Achard
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ismini Mainta
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Groupe Oncorad-Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Supiot S, Vaugier L, Pasquier D, Buthaud X, Magné N, Peiffert D, Sargos P, Crehange G, Pommier P, Loos G, Hasbini A, Latorzeff I, Silva M, Denis F, Lagrange JL, Morvan C, Campion L, Blanc-Lapierre A. OLIGOPELVIS GETUG P07, a Multicenter Phase II Trial of Combined High-dose Salvage Radiotherapy and Hormone Therapy in Oligorecurrent Pelvic Node Relapses in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 80:405-414. [PMID: 34247896 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligorecurrent pelvic nodal relapse in prostatic cancer is a challenge for regional salvage treatments. Androgen depriving therapies (ADTs) are a mainstay in metastatic prostate cancer, and salvage pelvic radiotherapy may offer long ADT-free intervals for patients harboring regional nodal relapses. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of the combination of ADT and salvage radiotherapy in men with oligorecurrent pelvic node relapses of prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed an open-label, phase II trial of combined high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy and ADT (6 mo) in oligorecurrent (five or fewer) pelvic node relapses in prostate cancer, detected by fluorocholine positron-emission tomography computed tomography imaging. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was 2-yr progression-free survival defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen levels above the level at inclusion and/or clinical evidence of progression as per RECIST 1.1 and/or death from any cause. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between August 2014 and July 2016, 67 patients were recruited in 15 centers. Half of the patients had received prior prostatic irradiation. The median age was 67.7 yr. After a median follow-up of 49.4 mo, 2- and 3-yr progression-free survival rates were 81% and 58%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 45.3 mo. The median biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was 25.9 mo. At 2 and 3 yr, the BRFS rates were 58% and 46%, respectively. Grade 2 + 2-yr genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 10% and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Combined high-dose salvage pelvic radiotherapy and ADT appeared to prolong tumor control in oligorecurrent pelvic node relapses in prostate cancer with limited toxicity. After 3 yr, nearly half of patients were in complete remission. Our study showed initial evidence of benefit, but a randomized trial is required to confirm this result. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we looked at the outcomes of combined high-dose salvage pelvic radiotherapy and 6-mo-long hormone therapy in oligorecurrent pelvic nodal relapse in prostatic cancer. We found that 46% of patients presenting with oligorecurrent pelvic node relapses in prostate cancer were in complete remission after 3 yr following combined treatment at the cost of limited toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, St-Herblain, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes-Angers (CRCNA), UMR 1232 Inserm - 6299 CNRS, Institut de Recherche en Santé de l'Université de Nantes, Nantes Cedex, France.
| | - Loig Vaugier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, St-Herblain, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille, CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Xavier Buthaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gilles Crehange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Genevieve Loos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ali Hasbini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, Brest, France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncorad Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Marlon Silva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Fabrice Denis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | | | - Cyrille Morvan
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, Nantes, St-Herblain, France
| | - Loic Campion
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, Nantes, St-Herblain, France
| | - Audrey Blanc-Lapierre
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, Nantes, St-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease was originally defined by Hellman and Weichselbaum as an intermediate-state existing between locally confined and widely disseminated malignancy, whose natural history could be positively impacted with systemic and importantly local therapies such as radiation. Currently oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa) is defined clinically by lesion enumeration and several subgroups exist: de novo (synchronous) oligometastatic disease present at initial diagnosis, oligorecurrent (metachronous) disease arising after definitive therapy to the prostate, and oligoprogressive disease where isolated lesions progress in a background of otherwise stable disease. In this review we highlight current knowledge and the potential future of local therapies, such as radiation to the primary prostate and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), in the disease management of OPCa for all 3 subgroups. In addition, we examine more recent studies classifying the patterns of failure and natural history of OPCa following treatment with local therapies. Finally, while current clinical definitions of OPCa dominate, we introduce studies attempting to elucidate a more biological definition of OPCa to allow for improved selection of patients to treat with local therapies and to better inform precision combination approaches with systemic therapy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Slevin F, Thompson CM, Speight R, Murray LJ, Lilley J, Henry AM. Ultra hypofractionated extended nodal irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy for oligorecurrent pelvic nodal prostate cancer. Med Dosim 2021; 46:411-418. [PMID: 34148727 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) may recur after primary treatment but no standard of care exists for patients with pelvic nodal relapse. Based on obervational data, Extended Nodal Irradiation (ENI) might be associated with fewer treatment failures than Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) to the involved node(s) alone. Ultra hypofractionated ENI is yet to be evaluated in this setting, but it could provide a therapeutic advantage if PCa has a low α/β ratio in addition to patient convenience/resource benefits. This volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning study developed a class solution for 5-fraction Extended Nodal Irradiation (ENI) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to involved node(s). Ten patients with oligorecurrent nodal disease after radical prostatectomy/post-operative prostate bed radiotherapy were selected. Three plans were produced for each dataset to deliver 25 Gy in 5 fractions ENI plus SIBs of 40, 35 and 30 Gy. The biologically effective dose (BED) formula was used to determine the remaining dose in 5 fractions that could be delivered to re-irradiated segments of organs at risk (OARs). Tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated using the LQ-Poisson Marsden and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models respectively. Six patients had an OAR positioned within planning target volume node (PTVn), which resulted in reduced target coverage to PTV node in six, five and four instances for 40, 35 and 30 Gy SIB plans respectively. In these instances, only 30 Gy SIB plans had a median PTV coverage >90% (inter-quartile range 90-95). No OAR constraint was exceeded for 30 Gy SIB plans, including where segments of OARs were re-irradiated. Gross tumour volume node (GTVn) median TCP was 95.7% (94.4-96), 90.7% (87.1-91.2) and 78.6% (75.8-81.1) for 40, 35 and 30 Gy SIB plans respectively, where an α/β ratio of 1.5 was assumed. SacralPlex median NTCP was 43.2% (0.7-61.2), 12.1% (0.6-29.7) and 2.5% (0.5-5.1) for 40, 35 and 30 Gy SIB plans respectively. NTCP for Bowel_Small was <0.3% and zero for other OARs for all three plan types. Ultra hypofractionated ENI planning for pelvic nodal relapsed PCa appears feasible with encouraging estimates of nodal TCP and low estimates of NTCP, especially where a low α/β ratio is assumed and a 30 Gy SIB is delivered. This solution should be further evaluated within a clinical trial and compared against SABR to involved node(s) alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | - Richard Speight
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Louise J Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mihai AM, Armstrong PJ, Hickey D, Milano MT, Dunne M, Healy K, Thirion P, Heron DE, ElBeltagi N, Armstrong JG. Late Toxicity and Long-Term Local Control in Patients With Ultra-Central Lung Tumours Treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy With Homogenous Dose Prescription. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:627-637. [PMID: 34092462 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To report late toxicity and long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with SABR for ultra-central tumours between May 2008 and April 2016. Ultra-central location was defined as tumour (GTV) abutting or involving trachea, main or lobar bronchi. Respiratory motion management and static-field dynamic-IMRT were used, with dose prescribed homogeneously (maximum <120%). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS Sixty-five per cent of patients had inoperable primary non-small cell lung cancer and 35% had lung oligometastases. The median age was 72 (range 34-85) years. The median gross tumour volume and planning target volume (PTV) were 19.6 (range 1.7-203.3) cm3 and 57.4 (range 7.7-426.6) cm3, respectively. The most commonly used dose fractionation was 60 Gy in eight fractions (n = 51, 87.8%). Median BED10 for D98%PTV and D2%PTV were 102.6 Gy and 115.06 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26.5 (range 3.2-100.5) months, fatal haemoptysis occurred in five patients (8.7%), of which two were directly attributable to SABR. A statistically significant difference was identified between median BED3 for 4 cm3 of airway, for patients who developed haemoptysis versus those who did not (147.4 versus 47.2 Gy, P = 0.005). At the last known follow-up, 50 patients (87.7%) were without local recurrence. Freedom from local progression at 2 and 4 years was 92 and 79.8%, respectively. The median overall survival was 34.3 (95% confidence interval 6.1-61.6) months. Overall survival at 2 and 4 years was 55.1 and 41.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with high-risk ultra-central lung tumours, IMRT-based SABR with homogenous dose prescription achieves high local control, similar to that reported for peripheral tumours. Although fatal haemoptysis occurred in 8.7% of patients, a direct causality with SABR was evident in only 3%. Larger studies are warranted to ascertain factors associated with outcomes, especially toxicity, and identify patients who would probably benefit from this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Mihai
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - P J Armstrong
- University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Hickey
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M T Milano
- University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - M Dunne
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - K Healy
- University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Thirion
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D E Heron
- Bon Secours Mercy Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - N ElBeltagi
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J G Armstrong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:575-580. [PMID: 33914101 PMCID: PMC8219546 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective The current article encompasses a literature review and recommendations for radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and methods A literature review focused on studies comparing metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. external elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) and studies analyzing recurrence patterns after local nodal treatment was performed. The DEGRO Prostate Cancer Expert Panel discussed the results and developed treatment recommendations. Results Metastasis-directed radiotherapy results in high local control (often > 90% within a follow-up of 1–2 years) and can be used to improve progression-free survival or defer androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) according to prospective randomized phase II data. Distant progression after involved-node SABR only occurs within a few months in the majority of patients. ENRT improves metastases-free survival rates with increased toxicity in comparison to SABR according to retrospective comparative studies. The majority of nodal recurrences after initial local treatment of pelvic nodal metastasis are detected within the true pelvis and common iliac vessels. Conclusion ENRT with or without a boost should be preferred to SABR in pelvic nodal recurrences. In oligometastatic prostate cancer with distant (extrapelvic) nodal recurrences, SABR alone can be performed in selected cases. Application of additional systemic treatments should be based on current guidelines, with ADT as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Only in carefully selected patients can radiotherapy be initially used without additional ADT outside of the current standard recommendations. Results of (randomized) prospective studies are needed for definitive recommendations.
Collapse
|
43
|
Oligometastatic and Oligoprogression Disease and Local Therapies in Prostate Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:137-143. [PMID: 32205538 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of metastatic disease is rapidly advancing, with recent evidence supporting an oligometastatic state currently defined by patients having a limited (typically ≤5) number of metastatic deposits. The optimal management of these patients is also shifting toward increased integration of local therapies, with emerging evidence suggesting metastasis-directed therapy can improve overall survival. Additionally, the use of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy within castration-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer cohorts appears to forestall the need to initiate systemic therapy, which has unfavorable side effect profiles, such as androgen deprivation therapy, while itself being associated with little toxicity. We review the literature surrounding the use of metastasis-directed therapy in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer by reviewing the evidence for its use within 3 subgroups: de novo synchronous, oligorecurrent, and oligoprogressive disease.
Collapse
|
44
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer using 1.5 T MRI-Linac: preliminary data on feasibility and acute patient-reported outcomes. Radiol Med 2021; 126:989-997. [PMID: 33835309 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01352-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report preliminary data on feasibility and patient-reported outcomes following PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between October 2019 and April 2020, twenty consecutive castration sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients were enrolled in an ethical committee approved prospective observational study (Protocol n. XXXX) and treated with PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The mean delivered dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Clinicians reported toxicity was prospectively collected according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Quality of life (QoL) assessment was performed using EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaires administered at baseline, end of treatment and at first follow-up. RESULTS Twenty-five lesions in 20 castration sensitive oligorecurrent patients were treated: the most commonly treated anatomic sites were nodal (n = 16) and pelvic bone (n = 9). Median PSA-value preMRI guided SBRT was 1.16 ng/mL (range, 0.27-8.9), whereas median PSA value at first follow-up after SBRT was 0.44 ng/mL (range, 0.06-8.15). At first follow-up, for 16 patients showing detectable PSA, PSMA-PET/CT was performed detecting, respectively, in 6 cases partial response and in 10 cases complete response. In the remaining cases, PSA-value was undetectable after SBRT. Radiotherapy treatment was safe and well tolerated according to the PROMs. No acute G2 or higher toxicities were recorded. CONCLUSIONS The current series represent the largest one exploring the feasibility and patient-reported outcomes following PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac. The preliminary findings here reported are encouraging in terms of effectiveness and tolerability.
Collapse
|
45
|
Burkon P, Selingerova I, Slavik M, Pospisil P, Bobek L, Kominek L, Osmera P, Prochazka T, Vrzal M, Kazda T, Slampa P. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lymph Node Oligometastases: Real-World Evidence From 90 Consecutive Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 10:616494. [PMID: 33614499 PMCID: PMC7892582 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.616494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of oligometastatic lymph node involvement in the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, or pelvis, in a consecutive group of patients from real clinical practice outside clinical trials. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 90 patients with a maximum of four oligometastases and various primary tumors (the most common being colorectal cancers). The endpoints were local control of treated metastases (LC), freedom from widespread dissemination (FFWD), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and freedom from systemic treatment (FFST). Acute and delayed toxicities were also evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up after SBRT was 34.9 months. The LC rate at three and five years was 68.4 and 56.3%, respectively. The observed median FFWD was 14.6 months, with a five-year FFWD rate of 33.7%. The median PFS was 9.4 months; the three-year PFS rate was 19.8%. The median FFST was 14.0 months; the five-year FFST rate was 23.5%. The OS rate at three and five years was 61.8 and 39.3%, respectively. Median OS was 53.1 months. The initial dissemination significantly shortened the time to relapse, death, or activation of systemic treatment-LC (HR 4.8, p < 0.001), FFWD (HR 2.8, p = 0.001), PFS (HR 2.1, p = 0.011), FFST (HR 2.4, p = 0.005), OS (HR 2.2, p = 0.034). Patients classified as having radioresistant tumors noticed significantly higher risk in terms of LC (HR 13.8, p = 0.010), FFWD (HR 3.1, p = 0.006), PFS (HR 3.5, p < 0.001), FFST (HR 3.2, p = 0.003). The multivariable analysis detected statistically significantly worse survival outcomes for initially disseminated patients as well as separately in groups divided according to radiosensitivity. No grade III or IV toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION Our study shows that targeted SBRT is a very effective and low toxic treatment for oligometastatic lymph node involvement. It can delay the indication of cytotoxic chemotherapy and thus improve and maintain patient quality of life. The aim of further studies should focus on identifying patients who benefit most from SBRT, as well as the correct timing and dosage of SBRT in treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Burkon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Iveta Selingerova
- Research Center for Applied Molecular Oncology (RECAMO), Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Marek Slavik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Lukas Bobek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Libor Kominek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Pavel Osmera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Tomas Prochazka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Miroslav Vrzal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
- Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Pavel Slampa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Carrasquilla M, Creswell ML, Pepin AN, Wang E, Forsthoefel M, McGunigal M, Bullock E, Lei S, Collins BT, Lischalk JW, Esposito G, Aghdam N, Kumar D, Suy S, Leger P, Hankins RA, Dawson NA, Collins SP. Rationale for Involved Field Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy-Enhanced Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Hormone-Sensitive Nodal Oligo-Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:606260. [PMID: 33537236 PMCID: PMC7848164 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.606260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is a common clinical scenario that is likely to increase significantly with the widespread adoption of novel positron emission tomography (PET) agents. Despite increasing evidence that localized therapy is disease modifying, most men with lymph node recurrent prostate cancer receive only systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For men who receive localized therapy the intent is often to delay receipt of systemic therapy. Little evidence exists on the optimal combination of local and systemic therapy in this patient population. In this hypothesis generating review, we will outline the rationale and propose a framework for combining involved field SBRT with risk adapted intermittent ADT for hormone sensitive nodal recurrent prostate cancer. In patients with a limited number of nodal metastases, involved field stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may have a role in eliminating castrate-resistant clones and possibly prolonging the response to intermittent ADT. We hypothesize that in a small percentage of patients, such a treatment approach may lead to long term remission or cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | - Abigail N. Pepin
- George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Edina Wang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Matthew Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mary McGunigal
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Bullock
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Giuseppe Esposito
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Paul Leger
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ryan A. Hankins
- Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nancy A. Dawson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Oligorecurrent prostate cancer treated with metastases-directed therapy or standard of care: a single-center experience. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 24:514-523. [PMID: 33268854 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00307-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is a matter of debate. We aimed to assess oncologic outcomes of patients treated with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) vs. androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for oligorecurrent PCa. METHODS We analyzed data from patients with oligorecurrent PCa treated with ADT (n = 121), salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) (n = 191) or external beam RT (EBRT) (n = 178). Radiological recurrence (RAR) was defined as a positive positron emission tomography imaging after MDT or ADT. Second-line systemic therapies (SST) were defined as any systemic therapy administered for progression. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated separately for patients with node-only or bone metastases. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess time to RAR, SST, and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Predictors of RAR, SST, and castration-resistant PCa (CRPCa) were assessed with Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 74 (22.6%), 63 (19.2%), and 191 (58.2%) patients were treated with ADT, EBRT, and sLND for lymph node-only recurrence. Both sLND (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.94) and EBRT (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85) were associated with better RAR than ADT. Similarly, sLND (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.50) and EBRT (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.87) were associated with longer SST, as compared with ADT. Similar results were found for CRPCa status. Oncologic outcomes were similar between sLND and EBRT. MDT was not associated with survival benefit in patients with bone metastases as compared with ADT. CONCLUSIONS sLND and EBRT were associated with better RAR, SST, and CRPCa-free survival as compared with ADT in patients with oligometastatic PCa nodal recurrence. No difference in survival outcomes was observed between sLND and EBRT. MDT was not associated with survival benefit in patients with bone metastases, as compared with ADT.
Collapse
|
48
|
Fleming CW, Broughman JR, Tendulkar RD. Treatment Options in Oligometastatic Disease in Prostate Cancer: Thinking Outside the Box. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 22:2. [PMID: 33216272 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00798-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Due to its relatively indolent disease course, the sensitivity of PSA testing, and the emergence of novel PET imaging, metastatic prostate cancer is particularly likely to present with a limited volume of disease. Patients with up to five metastatic lesions should be considered for an oligometastatic treatment approach. Systemic therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for these patients. The optimal type and duration are unknown; however, the addition of a second agent to ADT appears to be beneficial. Multiple recent studies have found significant benefits to the integration of systemic therapy and local metastasis-directed therapies (MDT), including radiation and surgery, to the prostate and metastatic sites. MDT may also be used in select patients wishing to delay the initiation of systemic therapy. For patients with isolated regional nodal recurrences, whole pelvic radiotherapy or extensive lymphadenectomy is preferred, in combination with ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue/CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - James R Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue/CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Rahul D Tendulkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue/CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Slevin F, Beasley M, Cross W, Scarsbrook A, Murray L, Henry A. Patterns of Lymph Node Failure in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer Postradical Prostatectomy and Implications for Salvage Therapies. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1126-1140. [PMID: 33305073 PMCID: PMC7718540 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing use of radical prostatectomy to treat patients with high-risk prostate cancer. This has contributed toward a pathologic stage migration, and a greater number of patients are subsequently being diagnosed with biochemical failure. There is increasing use of advanced imaging techniques in the setting of biochemical failure, including positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This critical literature review highlights the evidence for PET-CT in postprostatectomy biochemical failure and identifies sites of pelvic lymph node relapse in the setting of biochemical failure and the potential implications that the locations of these relapses may have for salvage therapies. Potential future directions are then considered. RESULTS The optimal PET-CT tracer remains uncertain but there is increasing use of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT for investigating sites of nodal metastasis at low prostate-specific antigen levels, and this is leading to a blurring of the biochemical and radiologic recurrence phases. The optimal therapeutic approach remains undefined, with current trials investigating postoperative radiation therapy to the whole pelvis in addition to the prostatic fossa, the use of PET-CT in the setting of biochemical recurrence to guide delivery of salvage radiation therapy, and, for patients with node-only relapsed prostate cancer, the addition of whole pelvis radiation therapy to metastasis-directed therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The most appropriate target volume for salvage radiation therapy remains uncertain, and the findings of studies using PET-CT to map nodal recurrences suggest that there could be a role for extending whole pelvis radiation therapy volumes to increase coverage of superior nodal regions. The emerging fields of radiomics and radiogenomics could provide important prognostic information and aid decision making for patients with relapsed prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Beasley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - William Cross
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Achard V, Bottero M, Rouzaud M, Lancia A, Scorsetti M, Filippi AR, Franzese C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ingrosso G, Ost P, Zilli T. Radiotherapy treatment volumes for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1224-1234. [PMID: 32536241 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1775291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is an emerging treatment strategy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, large heterogeneities exist in the RT regimens used, with series reporting the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) strategies and others the delivery of focal treatments to the relapsing nodes with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). In this systematic review of the literature we compared the oncological outcomes and toxicity of the different RT regimens for nodal oligorecurrent PCa patients, with the aim of defining the optimal RT target volume in this setting. METHODS We performed a systemic search on the Pubmed database to identify articles reporting on the use of ENRT or SBRT for oligometastatic PCa with nodal recurrence. RESULTS Twenty-two articles were analyzed, including four prospective phase II trials (3 with SBRT and 1 with ENRT). Focal SBRT, delivered with an involved node, involved site, and involved field modality, was the most commonly used strategy with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 16 to 58% and a very low toxicity profile. Improved PFS rates were observed with ENRT strategies (52-80% at 3 years) compared to focal SBRT, despite a slightly higher toxicity rate. One ongoing randomized phase II trial is comparing both modalities in patients with nodal oligorecurrent PCa. CONCLUSIONS With a large variability in patterns of practice, the optimal RT strategy remains to be determined in the setting of nodal oligorecurrent PCa. Ongoing randomized trials and advances in translational research will help to shed light on the best management for these patients. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bottero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tor Vergata General Hospital, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|