1
|
Saunders D, Koyfman SA, Ismaila N, Futran ND, Mowery YM, Watson E, Yang DH, Peterson DE. Prevention and Management of Osteoradionecrosis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy: ISOO-MASCC-ASCO Guideline Clinical Insights. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400182. [PMID: 38691818 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Saunders
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Neal D Futran
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Erin Watson
- Department of Dental Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David H Yang
- BC Cancer/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peterson DE, Koyfman SA, Yarom N, Lynggaard CD, Ismaila N, Forner LE, Fuller CD, Mowery YM, Murphy BA, Watson E, Yang DH, Alajbeg I, Bossi P, Fritz M, Futran ND, Gelblum DY, King E, Ruggiero S, Smith DK, Villa A, Wu JS, Saunders D. Prevention and Management of Osteoradionecrosis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy: ISOO-MASCC-ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302750. [PMID: 38691821 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for prevention and management of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw secondary to head and neck radiation therapy in patients with cancer. METHODS The International Society of Oral Oncology-Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (ISOO-MASCC) and ASCO convened a multidisciplinary Expert Panel to evaluate the evidence and formulate recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, published between January 1, 2009, and December 1, 2023. The guideline also incorporated systematic reviews conducted by ISOO-MASCC, which included studies published from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2008. RESULTS A total of 1,539 publications were initially identified. There were 487 duplicate publications, resulting in 1,052 studies screened by abstract, 104 screened by full text, and 80 included for systematic review evaluation. RECOMMENDATIONS Due to limitations of available evidence, the guideline relied on informal consensus for some recommendations. Recommendations that were deemed evidence-based with strong evidence by the Expert Panel were those pertaining to best practices in prevention of ORN and surgical management. No recommendation was possible for the utilization of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin or photobiomodulation for prevention of ORN. The use of hyperbaric oxygen in prevention and management of ORN remains largely unjustified, with limited evidence to support its practice.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Noam Yarom
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
- Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Charlotte Duch Lynggaard
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lone E Forner
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | | | - Yvonne M Mowery
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Erin Watson
- Department of Dental Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David H Yang
- BC Cancer/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ivan Alajbeg
- University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Neal D Futran
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Edward King
- Northern Colorado Head and Neck Cancer Support Group, Windsor, CO
| | - Salvatore Ruggiero
- New York Center for Orthognathic and Maxillofacial Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Jonn S Wu
- BC Cancer/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Deborah Saunders
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moreno AC, Watson EE, Humbert-Vidan L, Peterson DE, van Dijk LV, Urbano TG, Van den Bosch L, Hope AJ, Katz MS, Hoebers FJ, Aponte Wesson RA, Bates JE, Bossi P, Dayo AF, Doré M, Fregnani ER, Galloway TJ, Gelblum DY, Hanna IA, Henson CE, Kiat-amnuay S, Korfage A, Lee NY, Lewis CM, Lynggaard CD, Mäkitie AA, Magalhaes M, Mowery YM, Muñoz-Montplet C, Myers JN, Orlandi E, Patel J, Rigert JM, Saunders D, Schoenfeld JD, Selek U, Somay E, Takiar V, Thariat J, Verduijn GM, Villa A, West N, Witjes MJ, Won A, Wong ME, Yao CM, Young SW, Al-eryani K, Barbon CE, Buurman DJ, Dieleman FJ, Hofstede TM, Khan AA, Otun AO, Robinson JC, Hum L, Johansen J, Lalla R, Lin A, Patel V, Shaw RJ, Chambers MS, Ma D, Singh M, Yarom N, Mohamed ASR, Hutcheson KA, Lai SY, Fuller CD. International Expert-Based Consensus Definition, Staging Criteria, and Minimum Data Elements for Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw: An Inter-Disciplinary Modified Delphi Study. medRxiv 2024:2024.04.07.24305400. [PMID: 38645105 PMCID: PMC11030490 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.07.24305400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a severe iatrogenic disease characterized by bone death after radiation therapy (RT) to the head and neck. With over 9 published definitions and at least 16 diagnostic/staging systems, the true incidence and severity of ORNJ are obscured by lack of a standard for disease definition and severity assessment, leading to inaccurate estimation of incidence, reporting ambiguity, and likely under-diagnosis worldwide. This study aimed to achieve consensus on an explicit definition and phenotype of ORNJ and related precursor states through data standardization to facilitate effective diagnosis, monitoring, and multidisciplinary management of ORNJ. Methods The ORAL Consortium comprised 69 international experts, including representatives from medical, surgical, radiation oncology, and oral/dental disciplines. Using a web-based modified Delphi technique, panelists classified descriptive cases using existing staging systems, reviewed systems for feature extraction and specification, and iteratively classified cases based on clinical/imaging feature combinations. Results The Consortium ORNJ definition was developed in alignment with SNOMED-CT terminology and recent ISOO-MASCC-ASCO guideline recommendations. Case review using existing ORNJ staging systems showed high rates of inability to classify (up to 76%). Ten consensus statements and nine minimum data elements (MDEs) were outlined for prospective collection and classification of precursor/ORNJ stages. Conclusion This study provides an international, consensus-based definition and MDE foundation for standardized ORNJ reporting in cancer survivors treated with RT. Head and neck surgeons, radiation, surgical, medical oncologists, and dental specialists should adopt MDEs to enable scalable health information exchange and analytics. Work is underway to develop both a human- and machine-readable knowledge representation for ORNJ (i.e., ontology) and multidisciplinary resources for dissemination to improve ORNJ reporting in academic and community practice settings.
Collapse
|
4
|
Odhiambo DA, Pittman AN, Rickard AG, Castillo RJ, Bassil AM, Chen J, Ravotti ML, Xu ES, Himes JE, Daniel AR, Watts TL, Williams NT, Luo L, Kirsch DG, Mowery YM. Preclinical Evaluation of the ATR Inhibitor BAY 1895344 as a Radiosensitizer for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1315-1327. [PMID: 38104870 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite aggressive multimodal treatment that typically includes definitive or adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), locoregional recurrence rates approach 50% for patients with locally advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Thus, more effective therapeutics are needed to improve patient outcomes. We evaluated the radiosensitizing effects of ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR) inhibitor (ATRi) BAY 1895344 in preclinical models of HNSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Murine and human HPV-negative HNSCC cells (MOC2, MOC1, JHU-012) were treated with vehicle or ATRi with or without 4 Gy. Checkpoint kinase 1 phosphorylation and DNA damage (γH2AX) were evaluated by Western blot, and ATRi half-maximal inhibitory concentration was determined by MTT assay for HNSCC cells and immortalized murine oral keratinocytes. In vitro radiosensitization was tested by clonogenic assay. Cell cycle distribution and mitotic catastrophe were evaluated by flow cytometry. Mitotic aberrations were quantified by fluorescent microscopy. Tumor growth delay and survival were assessed in mice bearing MOC2 or JHU-012 transplant tumors treated with vehicle, ATRi, RT (10 Gy × 1 or 8 Gy × 3), or combined ATRi + RT. RESULTS ATRi caused dose-dependent reduction in checkpoint kinase 1 phosphorylation at 1 hour post-RT (4 Gy) and dose-dependent increase in γH2AX at 18 hours post-RT. Addition of RT to ATRi led to decreased BAY 1895344 half-maximal inhibitory concentration in HNSCC cell lines but not in normal tissue surrogate immortalized murine oral keratinocytes. Clonogenic assays demonstrated radiosensitization in the HNSCC cell lines. ATRi abrogated the RT-induced G2/M checkpoint, leading to mitosis with unrepaired DNA damage and increased mitotic aberrations (multinucleated cells, micronuclei, nuclear buds, nucleoplasmic bridges). ATRi and RT significantly delayed tumor growth in MOC2 and JHU-012 in vivo models, with improved overall survival in the MOC2 model. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrated that BAY 1895344 increased in vitro and in vivo radiosensitivity in HPV-negative HNSCC preclinical models, suggesting therapeutic potential warranting evaluation in clinical trials for patients with locally advanced or recurrent HPV-negative HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Odhiambo
- School of Medicine, Washington University of St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Allison N Pittman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ashlyn G Rickard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rico J Castillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alex M Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joshua Chen
- College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Madison L Ravotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric S Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jonathan E Himes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrea R Daniel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tammara L Watts
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nerissa T Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lixia Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Natesan D, Eisenstein EL, Thomas SM, Eclov NCW, Dalal NH, Stephens SJ, Malicki M, Shields S, Cobb A, Mowery YM, Niedzwiecki D, Tenenbaum JD, Palta M, Hong JC. Health Care Cost Reductions with Machine Learning-Directed Evaluations during Radiation Therapy - An Economic Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Study. NEJM AI 2024; 1:10.1056/aioa2300118. [PMID: 38586278 PMCID: PMC10997376 DOI: 10.1056/aioa2300118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) may cost-effectively direct health care by identifying patients most likely to benefit from preventative interventions to avoid negative and expensive outcomes. System for High-Intensity Evaluation During Radiation Therapy (SHIELD-RT; NCT04277650) was a single-institution, randomized controlled study in which electronic health record-based ML accurately identified patients at high risk for acute care (emergency visit or hospitalization) during radiotherapy (RT) and targeted them for supplemental clinical evaluations. This ML-directed intervention resulted in decreased acute care utilization. Given the limited prospective data showing the ability of ML to direct interventions cost-efficiently, an economic analysis was performed. METHODS A post hoc economic analysis was conducted of SHIELD-RT that included RT courses from January 7, 2019, to June 30, 2019. ML-identified high-risk courses (≥10% risk of acute care during RT) were randomized to receive standard of care weekly clinical evaluations with ad hoc supplemental evaluations per clinician discretion versus mandatory twice-weekly evaluations. The primary outcome was difference in mean total medical costs during and 15 days after RT. Acute care costs were obtained via institutional cost accounting. Physician and intervention costs were estimated via Medicare and Medicaid data. Negative binomial regression was used to estimate cost outcomes after adjustment for patient and disease factors. RESULTS A total of 311 high-risk RT courses among 305 patients were randomized to the standard (n=157) or the intervention (n=154) group. Unadjusted mean intervention group supplemental visit costs were $155 per course (95% confidence interval, $142 to $168). The intervention group had fewer acute care visits per course (standard, 0.47; intervention, 0.31; P=0.04). Total mean adjusted costs were $3110 per course for the standard group and $1494 for the intervention group (difference in means, $1616 [95% confidence interval, $1450 to $1783]; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS In this economic analysis of a randomized controlled, health care ML study, mandatory supplemental evaluations for ML-identified high-risk patients were associated with both reduced total medical costs and improved clinical outcomes. Further study is needed to determine whether economic results are generalizable. (Funded in part by The Duke Endowment, The Conquer Cancer Foundation, the Duke Department of Radiation Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01CA277782]; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04277650.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Natesan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Samantha M Thomas
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Nicole H Dalal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mary Malicki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Stacey Shields
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Alyssa Cobb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Julian C Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
- UCSF-UC Berkeley Joint Program in Computational Precision Health, San Francisco, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mowery YM. Cautionary Tale: Excess Toxicity With DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Inhibitor and Concurrent Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:757-758. [PMID: 38340769 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Departments of Radiation Oncology and Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stevens JB, Riley BA, Je J, Gao Y, Wang C, Mowery YM, Brizel DM, Yin FF, Liu JG, Lafata KJ. Radiomics on spatial-temporal manifolds via Fokker-Planck dynamics. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38190505 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delta radiomics is a high-throughput computational technique used to describe quantitative changes in serial, time-series imaging by considering the relative change in radiomic features of images extracted at two distinct time points. Recent work has demonstrated a lack of prognostic signal of radiomic features extracted using this technique. We hypothesize that this lack of signal is due to the fundamental assumptions made when extracting features via delta radiomics, and that other methods should be investigated. PURPOSE The purpose of this work was to show a proof-of-concept of a new radiomics paradigm for sparse, time-series imaging data, where features are extracted from a spatial-temporal manifold modeling the time evolution between images, and to assess the prognostic value on patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS To accomplish this, we developed an algorithm to mathematically describe the relationship between two images acquired at timet = 0 $t = 0$ andt > 0 $t > 0$ . These images serve as boundary conditions of a partial differential equation describing the transition from one image to the other. To solve this equation, we propagate the position and momentum of each voxel according to Fokker-Planck dynamics (i.e., a technique common in statistical mechanics). This transformation is driven by an underlying potential force uniquely determined by the equilibrium image. The solution generates a spatial-temporal manifold (3 spatial dimensions + time) from which we define dynamic radiomic features. First, our approach was numerically verified by stochastically sampling dynamic Gaussian processes of monotonically decreasing noise. The transformation from high to low noise was compared between our Fokker-Planck estimation and simulated ground-truth. To demonstrate feasibility and clinical impact, we applied our approach to 18 F-FDG-PET images to estimate early metabolic response of patients (n = 57) undergoing definitive (chemo)radiation for OPC. Images were acquired pre-treatment and 2-weeks intra-treatment (after 20 Gy). Dynamic radiomic features capturing changes in texture and morphology were then extracted. Patients were partitioned into two groups based on similar dynamic radiomic feature expression via k-means clustering and compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests (p < 0.05). These results were compared to conventional delta radiomics to test the added value of our approach. RESULTS Numerical results confirmed our technique can recover image noise characteristics given sparse input data as boundary conditions. Our technique was able to model tumor shrinkage and metabolic response. While no delta radiomics features proved prognostic, Kaplan-Meier analyses identified nine significant dynamic radiomic features. The most significant feature was Gray-Level-Size-Zone-Matrix gray-level variance (p = 0.011), which demonstrated prognostic improvement over its corresponding delta radiomic feature (p = 0.722). CONCLUSIONS We developed, verified, and demonstrated the prognostic value of a novel, physics-based radiomics approach over conventional delta radiomics via data assimilation of quantitative imaging and differential equations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack B Stevens
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Breylon A Riley
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jihyeon Je
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yuan Gao
- Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center/University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jian-Guo Liu
- Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kyle J Lafata
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su C, Kent CL, Pierpoint M, Floyd W, Luo L, Wiliams NT, Ma Y, Peng B, Lazarides AL, Subramanian A, Himes JE, Perez VM, Hernansaiz-Ballesteros RD, Roche KE, Modliszewski JL, Selitsky SR, Mari Shinohara, Wisdom AJ, Moding EJ, Mowery YM, Kirsch DG. Enhancing radiotherapy response via intratumoral injection of the TLR9 agonist CpG to stimulate CD8 T cells in an autochthonous mouse model of sarcoma. bioRxiv 2024:2024.01.03.573968. [PMID: 38260522 PMCID: PMC10802286 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.03.573968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is frequently used to treat cancers including soft tissue sarcomas. Prior studies established that the toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist cytosine-phosphate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG) enhances the response to radiation therapy (RT) in transplanted tumors, but the mechanism(s) remain unclear. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9 and the chemical carcinogen 3-methylcholanthrene (MCA) to generate autochthonous soft tissue sarcomas with high tumor mutation burden. Treatment with a single fraction of 20 Gy RT and two doses of CpG significantly enhanced tumor response, which was abrogated by genetic or immunodepletion of CD8+ T cells. To characterize the immune response to RT + CpG, we performed bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq, and mass cytometry. Sarcomas treated with 20 Gy and CpG demonstrated increased CD8 T cells expressing markers associated with activation and proliferation, such as Granzyme B, Ki-67, and interferon-γ. CpG + RT also upregulated antigen presentation pathways on myeloid cells. Furthermore, in sarcomas treated with CpG + RT, TCR clonality analysis suggests an increase in clonal T-cell dominance. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that RT + CpG significantly delays tumor growth in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner. These results provide a strong rationale for clinical trials evaluating CpG or other TLR9 agonists with RT in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Su
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Collin L. Kent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew Pierpoint
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Lixia Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nerissa T. Wiliams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Ajay Subramanian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan E. Himes
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mari Shinohara
- Department of Immunology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amy J. Wisdom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Everett J. Moding
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David G. Kirsch
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shenker RF, Razavian NB, D'Agostino RB, Mowery YM, Brizel DM, Hughes RT. Clinical outcomes of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma stratified by human papillomavirus subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 2024; 148:106644. [PMID: 38006690 PMCID: PMC10843598 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to determine if there is a survival difference between patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 versus HPV-non16 subtypes. PATIENT AND METHODS Databases were queried for full length, peer-reviewed, English language, articles published between 01/01/1980 and 06/08/2022. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of OPSCC associated with HPV16 and HPV-non16 subtypes with at least 10 patients were included. Primary outcome was the overall survival (OS) of patients with HPV16- versus HPV-non16-associated OPSCC. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and pooled rate of p16 positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria and included 1,310 patients with HPV16 and 219 with HPV-non16 subtypes of OPSCC. The prevalence of HPV-non16 was 14.3 %. The pooled 5-year OS rates for patients with HPV16 and HPV-non16 were 83.4 %(95 % CI 77.8-89.0 %) and 69.3 %(95 % CI 58.5-80.1 %), respectively. OS at 5 years was significantly worse for HPV-non16 subtype, compared to HPV16 (log odds ratio [OR] -0.54, p = 0.008). There was a trend towards worse 5-year RFS with HPV-non16 compared to HPV16 (log OR -0.55, p = 0.063). Patients with HPV-non16 disease were less likely to be p16 positive by IHC (log OR -0.91, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Patients with HPV-non16OPSCC may experience worse OS and were less likely to be p16 positive compared to patients with HPV16 disease. While future prospective validation is warranted, routine assessment of both p16 IHC and HPV subtype could be considered prior to pursuing treatment de-escalation for HPV-associated OPSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel F Shenker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Niema B Razavian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States
| | - Ralph B D'Agostino
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Ryan T Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Daniel AR, Su C, Williams NT, Li Z, Huang J, Lopez O, Luo L, Ma Y, Campos LDS, Selitsky SR, Modliszewski JL, Liu S, Hernansaiz-Ballesteros R, Mowery YM, Cardona DM, Lee CL, Kirsch DG. Temporary Knockdown of p53 During Focal Limb Irradiation Increases the Development of Sarcomas. Cancer Res Commun 2023; 3:2455-2467. [PMID: 37982576 PMCID: PMC10697056 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Approximately half of patients with cancer receive radiotherapy and, as cancer survivorship increases, the low rate of radiation-associated sarcomas is rising. Pharmacologic inhibition of p53 has been proposed as an approach to ameliorate acute injury of normal tissues from genotoxic therapies, but how this might impact the risk of therapy-induced cancer and normal tissue injuries remains unclear. We utilized mice that express a doxycycline (dox)-inducible p53 short hairpin RNA to reduce Trp53 expression temporarily during irradiation. Mice were placed on a dox diet 10 days prior to receiving 30 or 40 Gy hind limb irradiation in a single fraction and then returned to normal chow. Mice were examined weekly for sarcoma development and scored for radiation-induced normal tissue injuries. Radiation-induced sarcomas were subjected to RNA sequencing. Following single high-dose irradiation, 21% of animals with temporary p53 knockdown during irradiation developed a sarcoma in the radiation field compared with 2% of control animals. Following high-dose irradiation, p53 knockdown preserves muscle stem cells, and increases sarcoma development. Mice with severe acute radiation-induced injuries exhibit an increased risk of developing late persistent wounds, which were associated with sarcomagenesis. RNA sequencing revealed radiation-induced sarcomas upregulate genes related to translation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), inflammation, and the cell cycle. Comparison of the transcriptomes of human and mouse sarcomas that arose in irradiated tissues revealed regulation of common gene programs, including elevated EMT pathway gene expression. These results suggest that blocking p53 during radiotherapy could minimize acute toxicity while exacerbating late effects including second cancers. SIGNIFICANCE Strategies to prevent or mitigate acute radiation toxicities include pharmacologic inhibition of p53 and other cell death pathways. Our data show that temporarily reducing p53 during irradiation increases late effects including sarcomagenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea R. Daniel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Chang Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nerissa T. Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zhiguo Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jianguo Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Omar Lopez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lixia Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sara R. Selitsky
- QuantBio LLC, Durham, North Carolina
- Tempus Labs, Inc., Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Siyao Liu
- QuantBio LLC, Durham, North Carolina
- Tempus Labs, Inc., Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Diana M. Cardona
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Chang-Lung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David G. Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carpenter DJ, Patel P, Niedzwiecki D, Dillon M, Diaz AK, Kumar A, Mowery YM, Crowell KA, D'Anna R, Wu Q, Rodrigues A, Wisdom AJ, Dorth JA, Patel PR, Shortell CK, Brizel DM. Long-term risk of carotid stenosis and cerebrovascular disease after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Cancer 2023. [PMID: 37897711 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recipients of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) are at significantly increased risk for carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). We sought to determine (1) cumulative incidences of CAS and CVD among HNC survivors after RT and (2) whether CAS is associated with a RT dose response effect. METHODS This single-institution retrospective cohort study examined patients with nonmetastatic HNC who completed (chemo)RT from January 2000 through October 2020 and subsequently received carotid imaging surveillance ≤2 years following RT completion and, in the absence of CAS, every 3 years thereafter. Exclusion criteria included history of known CAS/CVD. Asymptomatic CAS was defined as ≥50% reduction of luminal diameter, symptomatic CAS as stroke or transient ischemic attack, and composite CAS as asymptomatic or symptomatic CAS. RESULTS Of 628 patients undergoing curative intent RT for HNC, median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.6-8.3), with 97 patients followed ≥10 years. Median age was 61 years and 69% of patients received concurrent chemotherapy and 28% were treated postoperatively. Actuarial 10-year incidences of asymptomatic, symptomatic, and composite CAS were 29.6% (95% CI, 23.9-35.5), 10.1% (95% CI, 7.0-13.9), and 27.2% (95% CI, 22.5-32.1), respectively. Multivariable Cox models significant association between asymptomatic CAS and absolute carotid artery volume receiving ≥10 Gy (per mL: hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16). CONCLUSIONS HNC survivors are at high risk for post-RT CAS. A dose response effect was observed for asymptomatic CAS at doses as low as 10 Gy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Recipients of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer are at significantly increased risk for carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular disease. However, carotid artery screening is not routinely performed among head and neck survivors following radiation therapy. In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, patients with head and neck cancer were initially screened for carotid artery stenosis ≤2 years following radiation therapy completion, then every 3 years thereafter. The 10-year actuarial incidence of carotid artery stenosis was >25% and stroke/transient ischemic attack >10%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significant associations between asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and artery volumes receiving ≥10 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Pranalee Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mairead Dillon
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alexander K Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kerri-Anne Crowell
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel D'Anna
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna Rodrigues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amy J Wisdom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer A Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pretesh R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cynthia K Shortell
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hillson JV, Allen DH, Carpenter DJ, Mowery YM. A Needs Assessment Exploring Radiation Oncology Nursing Confidence in Caring for Patients with Acute and Late Radiation Therapy Effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e392. [PMID: 37785317 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Registered Nurses (RN) have a critical and growing role in providing RO patient care. Moskalenko et al. published the first RO nursing needs assessment in the USA in 2021, reporting that RO nurses lacked standardized, structured education and certification programs for onboarding and continuing education. Herein, we report RN confidence in providing RO survivorship care. MATERIALS/METHODS With permission from Moskalenko et al., an adapted version of their needs assessment survey was administered to RNs at a single academic medical center RO department in an IRB-exempt study. This survey used a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Not At All Confident) to 5 (Extremely Confident) to assess confidence across the following clinical domains: managing acute and late radiation effects, providing patient education regarding imaging, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR), concurrent systemic therapy, anesthesia recovery, radiation safety, and general cancer knowledge. RESULTS RNs in RO were surveyed with a 100% (n = 14) response rate. Respondents were 61.5% oncology-certified nurses (OCN). 84.6% attended schools without affiliated RO departments or RO clinical experiences. 69.2% reported ≥5 years of oncology experience, and 45% had ≥5 years of RO experience. All RNs reported performing patient education. RNs expressed a high degree of confidence in managing triage phone calls (median 4, IQR [4-5]). RNs had moderate confidence in their general understanding of radiation (3 [3-4]), RO care team responsibilities (3 [3-4]), radiation treatment planning (3 [2-4]) and set up (3 [2-4]). RNs expressed the lowest confidence in regulatory aspects of radiation safety (2.5 [2-3]). RN confidence with patient education included the following domains: CT (3 [3-4]), MRI (3 [3-4]), PET (3 [3-4]), simulation (3 [2-4]), EBRT (3 [3-4]), anesthesia recovery (3 [3-4]), HDR (2.5 [1-5]), medication side effect management (4 3-4]), hormone treatments (3 [2-4]), and concurrent chemoradiation (3 [3-4]). Regarding acute toxicity management, RNs reported highest confidence with prostate/genitourinary (4 [3-4]), lung (4 [3-4]), and sarcoma cancers (3.5 [2-4]); with lower scores across hematologic (2.5 [2-4]) and pediatric cancers (2 [1-4]). Regarding late side effect management, the highest scores were observed among prostate/genitourinary (3 [2-4]), sarcoma (3 [2-4]), and breast (3 [2-3]) cancers; with comparatively lower scores for skin (2 [2-4]), CNS (2 [2-3]), GI (2 [2-3]), hematologic (2 [2-3]), and pediatric cancers (2 [1-2]). CONCLUSION While this single-site pilot project is limited by small sample size, it highlights the need for a formalized curriculum, scope of practice, and credentialing for RO nurses. These data can help to target education needs while guiding curriculum development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D H Allen
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - D J Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Cancer Center, Durham, NC
| | - Y M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shenker RF, Johnson TL, Ribeiro MR, Karukonda P, Brizel DM, Chino F, Chino JP, Mowery YM. Environmental Toxicity of Driving Distance to External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e625. [PMID: 37785869 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) For many patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), distance from home to treatment center is significant and require housing in closer proximity to minimize this travel burden. Patient transport also contributes significantly to the carbon footprint of EBRT. We sought to define the difference of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from commuting for patients who stay at a charity housing (CH) facility during treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) versus a commute from home. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with HNC were enrolled in an IRB-approved prospective protocol from 2019-2021. A distance of 3 miles (mi) was calculated from CH to our facility using Google Maps. Driving distance from home was indicated by patient self-report. Distance traveled per day Mon-Fri was doubled to account for driving to and from treatment. It was assumed that patients staying at CH returned home on weekends and that all used a standard, gasoline powered automobile for transportation to and from home. Transportation from CH to treatment was via a gasoline powered, 6-person shuttle. Both forms of transport were considered light-duty vehicles (LDV) with mileage and tailpipe emissions corresponding to the US on-road average (23.7 mi per gallon and 0.84 lb CO2/mi). For estimation of CH emissions, conversions were made from the reported electricity bill multiplied by the North Carolina grid emissions rate of 0.698 lb CO2/kWh. Natural gas used by CH for heating (prorated per patient) was estimated using the Piedmont Natural Gas rate (located in NC) and the monthly gas bill. Emissions from patient homes were assumed to be similar for patients commuting and making use of CH and therefore ignored. RESULTS Forty-nine patients enrolled in the study: 38 drove themselves to treatment daily, and 2 stayed at CH. The remaining 9 patients indicated that they stayed with friends/family or in a hotel where travel distance to DCI was unknown. CH electricity emissions were estimated to be 8,823 lb CO2/month. CH gas emissions were estimated to be 2,210.6 lb CO2/month. Emissions at CH were calculated as 137.9 lb CO2 per patient per month. The median emissions of those who drove daily per course of EBRT was 1205.4 lb CO2 (IQR 366.0 - 2221.2). For the 2 patients who stayed at the CH, total mi per course were 650 and 774. Including emissions of CH, emissions per patient were 1305.6 and 1523.2 lb CO2. If these patients were to have driven daily from their home, emissions would have been doubled (2368.8 and 2646 lb CO2, respectively). CH was estimated to result in fewer emissions for those that live ≥ 12 miles from the treatment facility. CONCLUSION Affordable and safe housing, such as charity housing is not only convenient for patients, but also reduces the environmental impact of travel for care for HNC. Patients who stayed at the charity housing in this study reduced their emissions from travel by nearly a half compared to driving daily in a personal vehicle. Further studies are imperative to continue to measure and mitigate the environmental toxicity of cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R F Shenker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - T L Johnson
- Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment, Durham, NC
| | - M R Ribeiro
- Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment, Durham, NC
| | - P Karukonda
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, NC
| | - D M Brizel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - F Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J P Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Y M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rickard AG, Mowery YM, Bassil A, Rouse DC, Williams NT, Charity T, Belloni R, Crouch B, Ramanujam N, Stevenson D, Castillo R, Blocker S, Epel B, Kotecha M, Palmer GM. Evaluating Tumor Hypoxia Radiosensitization Via Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oxygen Imaging (EPROI). Mol Imaging Biol 2023:10.1007/s11307-023-01855-0. [PMID: 37721686 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-023-01855-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor hypoxia contributes to aggressive phenotypes and diminished therapeutic responses to radiation therapy (RT) with hypoxic tissue being 3-fold less radiosensitive than normoxic tissue. A major challenge in implementing hypoxic radiosensitizers is the lack of a high-resolution imaging modality that directly quantifies tissue-oxygen. The electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen-imager (EPROI) was used to quantify tumor oxygenation in two murine tumor models: E0771 syngeneic transplant breast cancers and primary p53/MCA soft tissue sarcomas, with the latter autochthonous model better recapitulating the tumor microenvironment in human malignancies. We hypothesized that tumor hypoxia differs between these models. We also aimed to quantify the absolute change in tumor hypoxia induced by the mitochondrial inhibitor papaverine (PPV) and its effect on RT response. PROCEDURES Tumor oxygenation was characterized in E0771 and primary p53/MCA sarcomas via EPROI, with the former model also being quantified indirectly via diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). After confirming PPV's effect on hypoxic fraction (via EPROI), we compared the effect of 0 versus 2 mg/kg PPV prior to 20 Gy on tumor growth delay and survival. RESULTS Hypoxic sarcomas were more radioresistant than normoxic sarcomas (p=0.0057, 2-way ANOVA), and high baseline hypoxic fraction was a significant (p=0.0063, Cox Regression Model) hazard in survivability regardless of treatment. Pre-treatment with PPV before RT did not radiosensitize tumors in the sarcoma or E0771 model. In the sarcoma model, EPROI successfully identified baseline hypoxic tumors. DRS quantification of total hemoglobin, saturated hemoglobin, changes in mitochondrial potential and glucose uptake showed no significant difference in E0771 tumors pre- and post-PPV. CONCLUSION EPROI provides 3D high-resolution pO2 quantification; EPR is better suited than DRS to characterize tumor hypoxia. PPV did not radiosensitize E0771 tumors nor p53/MCA sarcomas, which may be related to the complex pattern of vasculature in each tumor. Additionally, understanding model-dependent tumor hypoxia will provide a much-needed foundation for future therapeutic studies with hypoxic radiosensitizers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlyn G Rickard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Alex Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Douglas C Rouse
- Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nerissa T Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Theresa Charity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rafaela Belloni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian Crouch
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nimmi Ramanujam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rico Castillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie Blocker
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Boris Epel
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- O2M Technologies LLC, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Gregory M Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mowery YM. Splitting the Difference With Intensified Radiation Therapy Alone for Borderline Early Stage Glottic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:9. [PMID: 37574250 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Himes JE, Wisdom AJ, Wang L, Shepard SJ, Daniel AR, Williams N, Luo L, Ma Y, Mowery YM, Kirsch DG. Both CD8 and CD4 T cells contribute to immunosurveillance preventing the development of neoantigen-expressing autochthonous sarcomas. bioRxiv 2023:2023.04.04.535550. [PMID: 37066384 PMCID: PMC10104072 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.04.535550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
The adaptive immune system plays an essential anti-tumor role through immunosurveillance and response to immunotherapies. Characterizing phenotypic features and mechanisms of dysfunction of tumor-specific T cell populations may uncover novel immunotherapeutic targets and biomarkers of response. To study tumor-specific T cell responses in vivo, a tumor model must express a known neoantigen. While transplant models with known neoantigen expression are widely available, autochthonous tumor models in which the tumor coevolves with the immune system are limited. In this study, we combined CRISPR/Cas9 and sleeping beauty transposase technology to develop an autochthonous orthotopic murine sarcoma model with oncogenic KrasG12D, functionally impaired p53, and expression of known MHCI and MHCII sarcoma neoantigens. Using MHC tetramer flow cytometry, we identified a tumor-specific immune response in the peripheral blood as early as 10 days after tumor induction leading to tumor clearance. Tumors developed at high penetrance after co-depletion of CD8 and CD4 T cells, but depletion of either CD8 or CD4 T cells alone was insufficient to permit tumor growth. These results suggest that CD8 and CD4 T cells can independently contribute to immunosurveillance leading to clearance of sarcomas expressing MHCI and MHCII neoantigens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon E. Himes
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Amy J. Wisdom
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02115
| | - Laura Wang
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Sam J. Shepard
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Andrea R. Daniel
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Nerissa Williams
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Lixia Luo
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - David G. Kirsch
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barnes JM, Graboyes EM, Adjei Boakye E, Schootman M, Chino JP, Moss HA, Mowery YM, Osazuwa-Peters N. Insurance Coverage and Forgoing Medical Appointments Because of Cost Among Cancer Survivors After 2016. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e589-e599. [PMID: 36649493 PMCID: PMC10530391 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The uninsured rate began rising after 2016, which some have attributed to health policies undermining aspects of the Affordable Care Act. Our primary objectives were to assess the changes in insurance coverage and forgoing medical care because of cost in cancer survivors from pre-enactment (2016) through postenactment of those policies (2019) and determine whether there were subgroups that were disproportionately affected. METHODS The 2016-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys were queried for 18- to 64-year-old cancer survivors. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to assess temporal changes in (1) insurance coverage and (2) forgoing medical appointments because of cost in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS A total of 62,669 cancer survivors were identified. The percentage of insured cancer survivors decreased from 92.4% in 2016 to 90.4% in 2019 (odds ratio for change in insurance coverage or affordability per one-year increase [ORyear], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.98; P = .01), translating to 161,000 fewer cancer survivors in the United States with insurance coverage. There were decreases in employer-sponsored insurance coverage (ORyear, 0.89) but increases in Medicaid coverage (ORyear, 1.17) from 2016 to 2019. Forgoing medical appointments because of cost increased from 17.9% in 2016 to 20.0% in 2019 (ORyear, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.1; P = .025), affecting an estimated 169,000 cancer survivors. The greatest changes were observed among individuals with low income, particularly those residing in nonexpansion states. CONCLUSION Between 2016 and 2019, there were 161,000 fewer cancer survivors in the United States with insurance coverage, and 169,000 forwent medical care because of cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M. Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Mario Schootman
- Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Junzo P. Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Haley A. Moss
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Natesan D, Cramer CK, Oyekunle T, Niedzwiecki D, Brizel DM, Mowery YM. Low contralateral neck recurrence risk with ipsilateral neck radiotherapy in N2b tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2023; 139:106362. [PMID: 36931141 PMCID: PMC10400120 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize factors including nodal burden, pre-treatment imaging, and other patient factors which may influence the role of ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (IRT) in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with multiple involved ipsilateral nodes. METHODS Patients with cT1-2N0-2bM0 (AJCC 7th edition) tonsillar SCC treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) at Duke University Medical Center from 1/1/1990-10/1/2019 were identified. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between those that received bilateral neck RT (BRT) versus IRT. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. A subset analysis of patients with N2b disease was performed. Patterns of recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS 120 patients with cT1-2N0-2b tonsillar SCC were identified, including 71 with N2b disease (BRT: n = 30; IRT: n = 41). Median follow-up was 80 months (range: 7-209). No N2b patients who received IRT had > 1 cm of soft palate/base of tongue extension. N2b patients treated with IRT had a median of 3 (range 2-9) involved lymph nodes, with median largest nodal dimension of 2.8 cm (range 1.3-4.8 cm). 93 % of N2b patients who received IRT had staging by PET/CT, and 100 % received IMRT. For N2b patients treated with IRT, there were no contralateral neck recurrences, and 10 year RFS was 95 % (95 % CI 82 %-98 %). CONCLUSIONS For patients treated with IRT for well-lateralized N2b tonsillar SCC, we observed high rates of local control with no observed contralateral neck recurrence. These data suggest that BRT is not universally necessary for patients with multiple involved ipsilateral nodes, particularly in the setting of baseline staging with PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Natesan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christina K Cramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Taofik Oyekunle
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barnes JM, Graboyes EM, Adjei Boakye E, Kent EE, Scherrer JF, Park EM, Rosenstein DL, Mowery YM, Chino JP, Brizel DM, Osazuwa-Peters N. The Affordable Care Act and suicide incidence among adults with cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:449-459. [PMID: 35368225 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01205-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer are at an increased suicide risk, and socioeconomic deprivation may further exacerbate that risk. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded insurance coverage options for low-income individuals and mandated coverage of mental health care. Our objective was to quantify associations of the ACA with suicide incidence among patients with cancer. METHODS We identified US patients with cancer aged 18-74 years diagnosed with cancer from 2011 to 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The primary outcome was the 1-year incidence of suicide based on cumulative incidence analyses. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses compared changes in suicide incidence from 2011-2013 (pre-ACA) to 2014-2016 (post-ACA) in Medicaid expansion relative to non-expansion states. We conducted falsification tests with 65-74-year-old patients with cancer, who are Medicare-eligible and not expected to benefit from ACA provisions. RESULTS We identified 1,263,717 patients with cancer, 812 of whom died by suicide. In DID analyses, there was no change in suicide incidence after 2014 in Medicaid expansion vs. non-expansion states for nonelderly (18-64 years) patients with cancer (p = .41), but there was a decrease in suicide incidence among young adults (18-39 years) (- 64.36 per 100,000, 95% CI = - 125.96 to - 2.76, p = .041). There were no ACA-associated changes in suicide incidence among 65-74-year-old patients with cancer. CONCLUSIONS We found an ACA-associated decrease in the incidence of suicide for some nonelderly patients with cancer, particularly young adults in Medicaid expansion vs. non-expansion states. Expanding access to health care may decrease the risk of suicide among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Department of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
- Simmons Cancer Institute, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Erin E Kent
- Departments of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Scherrer
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Support Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Comprehensive Cancer Support Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Junzo P Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Peehl DM, Badea CT, Chenevert TL, Daldrup-Link HE, Ding L, Dobrolecki LE, Houghton AM, Kinahan PE, Kurhanewicz J, Lewis MT, Li S, Luker GD, Ma CX, Manning HC, Mowery YM, O'Dwyer PJ, Pautler RG, Rosen MA, Roudi R, Ross BD, Shoghi KI, Sriram R, Talpaz M, Wahl RL, Zhou R. Animal Models and Their Role in Imaging-Assisted Co-Clinical Trials. Tomography 2023; 9:657-680. [PMID: 36961012 PMCID: PMC10037611 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9020053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The availability of high-fidelity animal models for oncology research has grown enormously in recent years, enabling preclinical studies relevant to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer to be undertaken. This has led to increased opportunities to conduct co-clinical trials, which are studies on patients that are carried out parallel to or sequentially with animal models of cancer that mirror the biology of the patients' tumors. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) are considered to be the models that best represent human disease and have high translational value. Notably, one element of co-clinical trials that still needs significant optimization is quantitative imaging. The National Cancer Institute has organized a Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP) network to establish best practices for co-clinical imaging and to optimize translational quantitative imaging methodologies. This overview describes the ten co-clinical trials of investigators from eleven institutions who are currently supported by the CIRP initiative and are members of the Animal Models and Co-clinical Trials (AMCT) Working Group. Each team describes their corresponding clinical trial, type of cancer targeted, rationale for choice of animal models, therapy, and imaging modalities. The strengths and weaknesses of the co-clinical trial design and the challenges encountered are considered. The rich research resources generated by the members of the AMCT Working Group will benefit the broad research community and improve the quality and translational impact of imaging in co-clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Peehl
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Cristian T Badea
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas L Chenevert
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Heike E Daldrup-Link
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Lacey E Dobrolecki
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Paul E Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - John Kurhanewicz
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Michael T Lewis
- Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shunqiang Li
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Gary D Luker
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Cynthia X Ma
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - H Charles Manning
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Robia G Pautler
- Department of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raheleh Roudi
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Brian D Ross
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kooresh I Shoghi
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Renuka Sriram
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Moshe Talpaz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Richard L Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Rong Zhou
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hong JC, Patel P, Eclov NCW, Stephens SJ, Mowery YM, Tenenbaum JD, Palta M. Healthcare provider evaluation of machine learning-directed care: reactions to deployment on a randomised controlled study. BMJ Health Care Inform 2023; 30:bmjhci-2022-100674. [PMID: 36764680 PMCID: PMC9923272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) face barriers related to implementation and trust. There have been few prospective opportunities to evaluate these concerns. System for High Intensity EvaLuation During Radiotherapy (NCT03775265) was a randomised controlled study demonstrating that ML accurately directed clinical evaluations to reduce acute care during cancer radiotherapy. We characterised subsequent perceptions and barriers to implementation. METHODS An anonymous 7-question Likert-type scale survey with optional free text was administered to multidisciplinary staff focused on workflow, agreement with ML and patient experience. RESULTS 59/71 (83%) responded. 81% disagreed/strongly disagreed their workflow was disrupted. 67% agreed/strongly agreed patients undergoing intervention were high risk. 75% agreed/strongly agreed they would implement the ML approach routinely if the study was positive. Free-text feedback focused on patient education and ML predictions. CONCLUSIONS Randomised data and firsthand experience support positive reception of clinical ML. Providers highlighted future priorities, including patient counselling and workflow optimisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian C Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA .,Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Joint Program in Computational Precision Health, UCSF-UC Berkeley, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Pranalee Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Neville C W Eclov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah J Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica D Tenenbaum
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu Y, Kramer JR, Sandulache VC, Yu R, Li G, Chen L, Yusuf ZI, Shi Y, Pyarajan S, Tsavachidis S, Jiao L, Mierzwa ML, Chiao E, Mowery YM, Shuman A, Shete S, Sikora AG, White DL. Immunogenetic Determinants of Susceptibility to Head and Neck Cancer in the Million Veteran Program Cohort. Cancer Res 2023; 83:386-397. [PMID: 36378845 PMCID: PMC9896026 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Increasing rates of human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) have largely offset declines in tobacco-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) at non-OPC sites. Host immunity is an important modulator of HPV infection, persistence, and clearance, and also of immune evasion in both virally- and nonvirally-driven cancers. However, the association between collective known cancer-related immune gene variants and HNSCC susceptibility has not been fully characterized. Here, we conducted a genetic association study in the multiethnic Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program cohort, evaluating 16,050 variants in 1,576 immune genes in 4,012 HNSCC cases (OPC = 1,823; non-OPC = 2,189) and 16,048 matched controls. Significant polymorphisms were further examined in a non-Hispanic white (NHW) validation cohort (OPC = 1,206; non-OPC = 955; controls = 4,507). For overall HNSCC susceptibility in NHWs, we discovered and validated a novel 9q31.1 SMC2 association and replicated the known 6p21.32 HLA-DQ-DR association. Six loci/genes for overall HNSCC susceptibility were selectively enriched in African-Americans (6p21.32 HLA-G, 9q21.33 GAS1, 11q12.2 CD6, 11q23.2 NCAM1/CD56, 17p13.1 CD68, 18q22.2 SOCS6); all 6 genes function in antigen-presenting regulation and T-cell activation. Two additional loci (10q26 DMBT1, 15q22.2 TPM1) were uncovered for non-OPC susceptibility, and three loci (11q24 CRTAM, 16q21 CDH5, 18q12.1 CDH2) were identified for HPV-positive OPC susceptibility. This study underscores the role of immune gene variants in modulating susceptibility for both HPV-driven and non-HPV-driven HNSCC. Additional large studies, particularly in racially diverse populations, are needed to further validate the associations and to help elucidate other potential immune factors and mechanisms that may underlie HNSCC risk. SIGNIFICANCE Several inherited variations in immune system genes are significantly associated with susceptibility to head and neck cancer, which could help improve personalized cancer risk estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhong Liu
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer R. Kramer
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vlad C. Sandulache
- ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Center for Translational Research in Inflammatory Disease (CTRID), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Yu
- Department of Biostatistics, Division of Basic Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Guojun Li
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zenab I. Yusuf
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yunling Shi
- Center for Data and Computational Sciences, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Saiju Pyarajan
- Center for Data and Computational Sciences, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Li Jiao
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Elizabeth Chiao
- Departments of Epidemiology and General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew Shuman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of Biostatistics, Division of Basic Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew G. Sikora
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Corresponding Authors: Donna L. White, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77021. E-mail: ; and Andrew G. Sikora, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail:
| | - Donna L. White
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,Center for Translational Research in Inflammatory Disease (CTRID), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,Corresponding Authors: Donna L. White, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77021. E-mail: ; and Andrew G. Sikora, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Blocker SJ, Morrison S, Everitt JI, Cook J, Luo S, Watts TL, Mowery YM. Whole-Slide Cytometric Feature Mapping for Distinguishing Tumor Genomic Subtypes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Whole-Slide Images. Am J Pathol 2023; 193:182-190. [PMID: 36414086 PMCID: PMC9885294 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous disease where, in advanced stages, clinical and pathologic stages do not correlate with outcome. Molecular and genomic biomarkers for HNSCC classification have shown promise for prognostic and therapeutic applications. This study utilized automated image analysis techniques in whole-slide images of HNSCC tumors to identify relationships between cytometric features and genomic phenotypes. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of HNSCC tumors (N = 49) were obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive, along with accompanying clinical, pathologic, genomic, and proteomic reports. Automated nuclear detection was performed across the entirety of slides, and cytometric feature maps were generated. Forty-one cytometric features were evaluated for associations with tumor grade, tumor stage, tumor subsite, and integrated genomic subtype. Thirty-two features demonstrated significant association with integrated genomic subtype when corrected for multiple comparisons. In particular, the basal subtype was visually distinguishable from the chromosomal instability and immune subtypes based on cytometric feature measurements. No features were significantly associated with tumor grade, stage, or subsite. This study provides preliminary evidence that features derived from tissue pathology slides could provide insights into genomic phenotypes of HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Blocker
- Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Samantha Morrison
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey I Everitt
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James Cook
- Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sheng Luo
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tammara L Watts
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patel R, Mowery YM, Qi Y, Bassil AM, Holbrook M, Xu ES, Hong CS, Himes JE, Williams NT, Everitt J, Ma Y, Luo L, Selitsky SR, Modliszewski JL, Gao J, Jung SH, Kirsch DG, Badea CT. Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy and Surgery Improves Metastasis-Free Survival over Surgery Alone in a Primary Mouse Model of Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2023; 22:112-122. [PMID: 36162051 PMCID: PMC9812921 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether adding neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody (anti-PD-1), or RT + anti-PD-1 to surgical resection improves disease-free survival for mice with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). We generated a high mutational load primary mouse model of STS by intramuscular injection of adenovirus expressing Cas9 and guide RNA targeting Trp53 and intramuscular injection of 3-methylcholanthrene (MCA) into the gastrocnemius muscle of wild-type mice (p53/MCA model). We randomized tumor-bearing mice to receive isotype control or anti-PD-1 antibody with or without radiotherapy (20 Gy), followed by hind limb amputation. We used micro-CT to detect lung metastases with high spatial resolution, which was confirmed by histology. We investigated whether sarcoma metastasis was regulated by immunosurveillance by lymphocytes or tumor cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Compared with surgery with isotype control antibody, the combination of anti-PD-1, radiotherapy, and surgery improved local recurrence-free survival (P = 0.035) and disease-free survival (P = 0.005), but not metastasis-free survival. Mice treated with radiotherapy, but not anti-PD-1, showed significantly improved local recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival over surgery alone (P = 0.043 and P = 0.007, respectively). The overall metastasis rate was low (∼12%) in the p53/MCA sarcoma model, which limited the power to detect further improvement in metastasis-free survival with addition of anti-PD-1 therapy. Tail vein injections of sarcoma cells into immunocompetent mice suggested that impaired metastasis was due to inability of sarcoma cells to grow in the lungs rather than a consequence of immunosurveillance. In conclusion, neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves metastasis-free survival after surgery in a primary model of STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutulkumar Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Yi Qi
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Alex M. Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Matt Holbrook
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Eric S. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Cierra S. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Jonathon E. Himes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Nerissa T. Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Jeffrey Everitt
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Lixia Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | | | | | - Junheng Gao
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - David G. Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708 USA,Department of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Cristian T. Badea
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hong JC, Eclov NCW, Stephens SJ, Mowery YM, Palta M. Implementation of machine learning in the clinic: challenges and lessons in prospective deployment from the System for High Intensity EvaLuation During Radiation Therapy (SHIELD-RT) randomized controlled study. BMC Bioinformatics 2022; 23:408. [PMID: 36180836 PMCID: PMC9526253 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-04940-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have resulted in significant enthusiasm for their promise in healthcare. Despite this, prospective randomized controlled trials and successful clinical implementation remain limited. One clinical application of ML is mitigation of the increased risk for acute care during outpatient cancer therapy. We previously reported the results of the System for High Intensity EvaLuation During Radiation Therapy (SHIELD-RT) study (NCT04277650), which was a prospective, randomized quality improvement study demonstrating that ML based on electronic health record (EHR) data can direct supplemental clinical evaluations and reduce the rate of acute care during cancer radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy. The objective of this study is to report the workflow and operational challenges encountered during ML implementation on the SHIELD-RT study. Results Data extraction and manual review steps in the workflow represented significant time commitments for implementation of clinical ML on a prospective, randomized study. Barriers include limited data availability through the standard clinical workflow and commercial products, the need to aggregate data from multiple sources, and logistical challenges from altering the standard clinical workflow to deliver adaptive care. Conclusions The SHIELD-RT study was an early randomized controlled study which enabled assessment of barriers to clinical ML implementation, specifically those which leverage the EHR. These challenges build on a growing body of literature and may provide lessons for future healthcare ML adoption. Trial registration: NCT04277650. Registered 20 February 2020. Retrospectively registered quality improvement study.
Collapse
|
26
|
Mazul AL, Hartman CM, Mowery YM, Kramer JR, White DL, Royse KE, Raychaudhury S, Sandulache VC, Ahmed ST, Zevallos JP, Richardson PA, Sikora AG, Chiao EY. Risk and incidence of head and neck cancers in veterans living with HIV and matched HIV-negative veterans. Cancer 2022; 128:3310-3318. [PMID: 35867552 PMCID: PMC10650941 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons living with HIV/AIDS have a higher incidence of virus-related and tobacco/alcohol-related cancers. This study is the first to estimate the effect of HIV versus HIV-negative veterans on the risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma incidence in a large retrospective cohort study. METHODS The authors constructed a retrospective cohort study using patient data from 1999 to 2016 from the National Veterans Administration Corporate Data Warehouse and the VA Central Cancer Registry. This cohort study included 45,052 veterans living with HIV/AIDS and 162,486 HIV-negative patients matched by age, sex, and index visit (i.e., HIV diagnosis date or clinic visit date). The age-standardized incidence rates and estimated adjusted hazard ratios were calculated with a Cox proportional hazards regression for oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The authors also abstracted human papillomavirus (HPV) status from oropharyngeal HNSCC diagnosed after 2010. RESULTS Veterans living with HIV/AIDS (VLWH) have 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36, 2.14) times the risk of oropharyngeal cancer and 2.06 (95% CI, 1.76, 2.42) times the hazard of nonoropharyngeal cancer compared with HIV-negative veterans. VLWH with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) were more likely to be HPV-positive (N = 30 [81.1%]) than the HIV-negative veterans with OPSCC (N = 50 [67.6%]), although this difference was not significant (p = .135). For nonoropharyngeal cancer, the increased risk of oral cavity cancer among VLWH drove the increased risk. CONCLUSIONS The study results suggest that HIV may play a role in virally mediated and nonvirally mediated HNSCC. As the HIV prevalence rises in the United States due to better survival and the incidence of HPV-positive oropharyngeal HNSCC increases, the interaction between HPV and HIV becomes increasingly relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L Mazul
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Division of Public Health Science, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Christine M Hartman
- VA Health Services Research Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer R Kramer
- VA Health Services Research Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Donna L White
- VA Health Services Research Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kathryn E Royse
- VA Health Services Research Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Vlad C Sandulache
- ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah T Ahmed
- VA Health Services Research Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose P Zevallos
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Peter A Richardson
- VA Health Services Research Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew G Sikora
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth Y Chiao
- Department of Epidemiology, Division of OVP, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kirsch DG, Patel R, Finkelstein SR, Ban J, Tang YJ, Huang J, Alman BA, Mowery YM. Abstract IA025: Using genetically engineered mouse models to study sarcoma metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sarcomas22-ia025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Despite aggressive conventional therapy, many patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma develop metastatic disease. To investigate mechanism(s) of sarcoma metastasis, our lab has utilized genetically engineered mouse models. For example, we injected an adenovirus expressing Cre recombinase (adeno-Cre) into the gastrocnemius muscle of LSL-KrasG12D; p53Flox/Flox (KP) mice to initiate high grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, and after amputation approximately 40% of the mice develop lung metastasis. Using a genetic approach, we found that miR-182, NEAT-1, and HIF-1a regulate metastasis to the lung. We also performed lineage tracing with complementary fluorescent proteins and CRISPR-generated bar codes to find that lung metastases from KP sarcomas arise from clones with specific gene expression profiles. Although the KP sarcoma model is useful for studying metastasis, one limitation of this model is that there are few non-synonymous mutations to engage the immune system. Therefore, we generated a high mutational load primary mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma by injecting adeno-Cre into the gastrocnemius muscle of p53Flox/Flox mice to delete p53 and also injected 3-methylcholanthrene (MCA) to generate primary p53/MCA undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas. In this p53/MCA model, the overall rate of lung metastasis after amputation was surprisingly low (~12%). We hypothesized that the immune system suppressed lung metastasis in this model. However, when we generated p53/MCA sarcomas in Rag2 −/− mice that lack mature B and T cells, we still observed a low rate of lung metastasis after amputation. These data suggest that mutations caused by MCA may have disabled tumor intrinsic factors needed to drive sarcoma metastasis. We are currently performing genome-wide screens in the p53/MCA model to search for genes required for sarcoma metastasis.
Citation Format: David G. Kirsch, Rutulkumar Patel, Sophie R. Finkelstein, Joy Ban, Yuning J Tang, Jianguo Huang, Benjamin A. Alman, Yvonne M. Mowery. Using genetically engineered mouse models to study sarcoma metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr IA025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joy Ban
- 1Duke University, Durham, NC,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Blocker SJ, Cook J, Everitt JI, Austin WM, Watts TL, Mowery YM. Automated Nuclear Segmentation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Pathology Reveals Relationships between Cytometric Features and ESTIMATE Stromal and Immune Scores. Am J Pathol 2022; 192:1305-1320. [PMID: 35718057 PMCID: PMC9484476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in the progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Currently, pathologic assessment of TME is nonstandardized and subject to observer bias. Genome-wide transcriptomic approaches to understanding the TME, while less subject to bias, are expensive and not currently a part of the standard of care for HNSCC. To identify pathology-based biomarkers that correlate with genomic and transcriptomic signatures of TME in HNSCC, cytometric feature maps were generated in a publicly available data set from a cohort of patients with HNSCC, including whole-slide tissue images and genomic and transcriptomic phenotyping (N = 49). Cytometric feature maps were generated based on whole-slide nuclear detection, using a deep-learning algorithm trained for StarDist nuclear segmentation. Cytometric features in each patient were compared to transcriptomic measurements, including Estimation of Stromal and Immune Cells in Malignant Tumor Tissues Using Expression Data (ESTIMATE) scores and stemness scores. With correction for multiple comparisons, one feature (nuclear circularity) demonstrated a significant linear correlation with ESTIMATE stromal score. Two features (nuclear maximum and minimum diameter) correlated significantly with ESTIMATE immune score. Three features (nuclear solidity, nuclear minimum diameter, and nuclear circularity) correlated significantly with transcriptomic stemness score. This study provides preliminary evidence that observer-independent, automated tissue-slide analysis can provide insights into the HNSCC TME which correlate with genomic and transcriptomic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Blocker
- Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - James Cook
- Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Wyatt M Austin
- Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tammara L Watts
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jacobs CD, Barak I, Jung SH, Rocke DJ, Kahmke RR, Suneja G, Mowery YM. Prediction model to estimate overall survival benefit of postoperative radiotherapy for resected major salivary gland cancers. Oral Oncol 2022; 132:105955. [PMID: 35752134 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a prediction model to estimate overall survival (OS) with and without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for resected major salivary gland (SG) cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with invasive non-metastatic major SG cancer between 2004 and 2015 were identified. Exclusion criteria included prior malignancy, pT1N0 or unknown stage, no or unknown surgery, and neoadjuvant therapy. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the effect of covariates on OS. A multivariate regression model was utilized to predict 2-, 5-, and 10-year OS. Internal cross-validation was performed using 50-50 hold-out and Harrell's concordance index. RESULTS 18,400 subjects met inclusion criteria, including 9,721 (53%) who received PORT. Distribution of SG involvement was 86% parotid, 13% submandibular, and 1% sublingual. Median follow-up for living subjects was 4.9 years. PORT was significantly associated with improved OS for the following subgroups by log-rank test: pT3 (p < 0.001), pT4 (p < 0.001), high grade (p < 0.001), node-positive (p < 0.001), and positive margin (p < 0.001). The following variables were incorporated into a multivariate model: age, sex, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, involved SG, pathologic T-stage, grade, margin status, ratio of nodal positivity, and PORT. The resulting model based on data from 6,138 subjects demonstrated good accuracy in predicting OS, with Harrell's concordance index of 0.73 (log-rank p < 0.001). CONCLUSION This cross-validated prediction model estimates 2-, 5-, and 10-year differences in OS based on receipt of PORT for resected major SG cancers using readily available clinicopathologic features. Clinicians can utilize this tool to aid personalized adjuvant therapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian Barak
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Daniel J Rocke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Russel R Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shenker RF, Price JG, Jacobs CD, Palta M, Czito BG, Mowery YM, Kirkpatrick JP, Boyer MJ, Oyekunle T, Niedzwiecki D, Song H, Salama JK. Comparing Outcomes of Oligometastases Treated with Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiotherapy (HIGRT) with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Technique versus Metastasis Alone: A Multi-Institutional Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102403. [PMID: 35626008 PMCID: PMC9139819 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT) is a common method in which high doses of radiation are delivered to treat oligometastatic disease. We have previously reported on the clinical outcomes of treating oligometastases with radiation using an elective simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB), delivering higher doses to known metastases and reduced doses to adjacent bone or nodal basins. Here we compare outcomes of oligometastases receiving radiation targeting metastases alone (MA) versus those treated via an SIB. Both SIB and MA irradiation of oligometastases achieved high rates of tumor metastases control and similar pain control. Further investigation of this technique with prospective trials is warranted. Abstract Purpose: We previously reported on the clinical outcomes of treating oligometastases with radiation using an elective simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB), delivering higher doses to known metastases and reduced doses to adjacent bone or nodal basins. Here we compare outcomes of oligometastases receiving radiation targeting metastases alone (MA) versus those treated via an SIB. Methods: Oligometastatic patients with ≤5 active metastases treated with either SIB or MA radiation at two institutions from 2013 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively for treatment-related toxicity, pain control, and recurrence patterns. Tumor metastasis control (TMC) was defined as an absence of progression in the high dose planning target volume (PTV). Marginal recurrence (MR) was defined as recurrence outside the elective PTV but within the adjacent bone or nodal basin. Distant recurrence (DR) was defined as any recurrence that is not within the PTV or surrounding bone or nodal basin. The outcome rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between the two techniques using the log-rank test. Results: 101 patients were treated via an SIB to 90 sites (58% nodal and 42% osseous) and via MA radiation to 46 sites (22% nodal and 78% osseous). The median follow-up among surviving patients was 24.6 months (range 1.4–71.0). Of the patients treated to MA, the doses ranged from 18 Gy in one fraction (22%) to 50 Gy in 10 fractions (50%). Most patients treated with an SIB received 50 Gy to the treated metastases and 30 Gy to the elective PTV in 10 fractions (88%). No acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in either cohort. Late grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 3 SIB patients (vocal cord paralysis and two vertebral body compression), all related to the high dose PTV and not the elective volume. There was similar crude pain relief between cohorts. The MR-free survival rate at 2 years was 87% (95% CI: 70%, 95%) in the MA group and 98% (95% CI: 87%, 99%) in the SIB group (p = 0.07). The crude TMC was 89% (41/46) in the MA group and 94% (85/90) in the SIB group. There were no significant differences in DR-free survival (65% (95% CI: 55–74%; p = 0.24)), disease-free survival (60% (95% CI: 40–75%; p = 0.40)), or overall survival (88% (95% CI: 73–95%; p = 0.26)), between the MA and SIB cohorts. Conclusion: Both SIB and MA irradiation of oligometastases achieved high rates of TMC and similar pain control, with a trend towards improved MR-free survival for oligometastases treated with an SIB. Further investigation of this technique with prospective trials is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel F. Shenker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Jeremy G. Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Corbin D. Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Cancer Care Northwest, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814, USA
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Brian G. Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
| | - Matthew J. Boyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Radiation Oncology Service, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Taofik Oyekunle
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (T.O.); (D.N.)
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (T.O.); (D.N.)
| | - Haijun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Radiation Oncology Service, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Joseph K. Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (R.F.S.); (J.G.P.); (C.D.J.); (M.P.); (B.G.C.); (Y.M.M.); (J.P.K.); (M.J.B.); (H.S.)
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Radiation Oncology Service, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +919-668-7339; Fax: +919-668-7345
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kent CL, Mowery YM, Babatunde O, Wright AO, Barak I, McSherry F, Herndon JE, Friedman AH, Zomorodi A, Peters K, Desjardins A, Friedman H, Sperduto W, Kirkpatrick JP. Long-Term Outcomes for Patients With Atypical or Malignant Meningiomas Treated With or Without Radiation Therapy: A 25-Year Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Institution Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100878. [PMID: 35647401 PMCID: PMC9133398 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Atypical (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 2) and malignant (WHO grade 3) meningiomas have high rates of local recurrence, and questions remain about the role of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients with WHO grade 2 disease. These patients frequently require salvage therapy, and optimal management is uncertain given limited prospective data. We report on the long-term outcomes for patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas treated with surgery and/or RT at our institution. Methods and Materials Data were collected through a retrospective chart review for all patients with WHO grade 2 or 3 meningiomas treated with surgery and/or RT at our institution between January 1992 and March 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were described using the KaplanMeier estimator. The outcomes in the subgroups were compared with a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for the univariable and multivariable analyses of predictors of PFS. Results A total of 66 patients were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 12.4 years overall and 8.6 years among surviving patients. Fifty-two patients (78.8%) had WHO grade 2 meningiomas, and 14 patients (21.2%) had WHO grade 3 disease. Thirty-six patients (54.5%) were treated with surgery alone, 28 patients (42.4%) with surgery and adjuvant RT, and 2 patients (3%) with RT alone. Median PFS and OS were 3.2 years and 8.8 years, respectively. PFS was significantly improved with adjuvant RT compared with surgery alone (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.70). Patients with Ki-67 index >10% showed a trend toward worse PFS compared with patients with Ki-67 ≤10% (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.04). No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed with respect to Simpson or WHO grade. Conclusions For patients with atypical or malignant meningiomas, adjuvant RT was associated with significantly improved PFS, and Ki-67 index >10% was associated with a trend toward worse PFS. Given the long-term survival, high recurrence rates, and efficacy of salvage therapy, patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas should be monitored systematically long after initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin L. Kent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Olayode Babatunde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Ato O. Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Pinnacle, Carlisle, Pennsylvania
| | - Ian Barak
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Frances McSherry
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James E. Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Allan H. Friedman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ali Zomorodi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Katherine Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Annick Desjardins
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Henry Friedman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Allphin AJ, Mowery YM, Lafata KJ, Clark DP, Bassil AM, Castillo R, Odhiambo D, Holbrook MD, Ghaghada KB, Badea CT. Photon Counting CT and Radiomic Analysis Enables Differentiation of Tumors Based on Lymphocyte Burden. Tomography 2022; 8:740-753. [PMID: 35314638 PMCID: PMC8938796 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8020061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate if radiomic analysis based on spectral micro-CT with nanoparticle contrast-enhancement can differentiate tumors based on lymphocyte burden. High mutational load transplant soft tissue sarcomas were initiated in Rag2+/− and Rag2−/− mice to model varying lymphocyte burden. Mice received radiation therapy (20 Gy) to the tumor-bearing hind limb and were injected with a liposomal iodinated contrast agent. Five days later, animals underwent conventional micro-CT imaging using an energy integrating detector (EID) and spectral micro-CT imaging using a photon-counting detector (PCD). Tumor volumes and iodine uptakes were measured. The radiomic features (RF) were grouped into feature-spaces corresponding to EID, PCD, and spectral decomposition images. The RFs were ranked to reduce redundancy and increase relevance based on TL burden. A stratified repeated cross validation strategy was used to assess separation using a logistic regression classifier. Tumor iodine concentration was the only significantly different conventional tumor metric between Rag2+/− (TLs present) and Rag2−/− (TL-deficient) tumors. The RFs further enabled differentiation between Rag2+/− and Rag2−/− tumors. The PCD-derived RFs provided the highest accuracy (0.68) followed by decomposition-derived RFs (0.60) and the EID-derived RFs (0.58). Such non-invasive approaches could aid in tumor stratification for cancer therapy studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex J. Allphin
- Quantitative Imaging and Analysis Lab, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 277101, USA; (D.P.C.); (M.D.H.)
- Correspondence: (A.J.A.); (C.T.B.)
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (Y.M.M.); (K.J.L.); (A.M.B.); (R.C.); (D.O.)
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kyle J. Lafata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (Y.M.M.); (K.J.L.); (A.M.B.); (R.C.); (D.O.)
- Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Darin P. Clark
- Quantitative Imaging and Analysis Lab, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 277101, USA; (D.P.C.); (M.D.H.)
| | - Alex M. Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (Y.M.M.); (K.J.L.); (A.M.B.); (R.C.); (D.O.)
| | - Rico Castillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (Y.M.M.); (K.J.L.); (A.M.B.); (R.C.); (D.O.)
| | - Diana Odhiambo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (Y.M.M.); (K.J.L.); (A.M.B.); (R.C.); (D.O.)
| | - Matthew D. Holbrook
- Quantitative Imaging and Analysis Lab, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 277101, USA; (D.P.C.); (M.D.H.)
| | - Ketan B. Ghaghada
- E.B. Singleton Department of Radiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cristian T. Badea
- Quantitative Imaging and Analysis Lab, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 277101, USA; (D.P.C.); (M.D.H.)
- Correspondence: (A.J.A.); (C.T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kheir WJ, Stinnett SS, Meltsner S, Semenova E, Mowery YM, Craciunescu O, Kirsch DG, Materin MA. Preliminary Results of Uveal Melanoma Treated With Iodine-125 Plaques: Analysis of Disease Control and Visual Outcomes With 63 Gy to the Target Volume. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100869. [PMID: 35387419 PMCID: PMC8977858 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to review the preliminary outcomes of patients with uveal melanoma treated with iodine-125 plaques using a novel treatment planning approach. Methods and Materials This was a single institution, retrospective review of patients treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma from November 2016 to February 2019. We used 3-dimensional treatment planning with the Eye Physics Plaque Simulator to ensure that a minimum of 63 Gy covered a 2-mm circumferential tumor margin and the apex height of the tumor over 94 hours. Primary endpoints were local failure, systemic metastasis, final visual acuity (VA), and radiation retinopathy. Associations between primary endpoints and tumor characteristics/radiation dose were performed using univariate analysis. Results Sixty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Mean largest basal diameter was 11.67 mm (range, 6-18; median, 12), and the average tumor thickness to the inner sclera was 3.18 mm (range, 0.5-9.3; median, 2.8). Molecular testing that was successfully performed in 59 patients revealed that 27% (16 of 59) had class 2 gene expression profile designation. Average follow-up posttreatment was 28.3 months (range, 4-46; median, 29), with 6% (4 of 69) developing local failure and 6% (4 of 69) developing metastasis over this duration. Average final VA (0.57 logMAR [Snellen 20/74]; range, 0-2.9; median, 0.3) was decreased from baseline (0.34 logMAR [Snellen 20/44]; range, 0-2.3; median, 0.1), and 48% (33 of 69) developed radiation retinopathy. Fifty percent of patients had a final VA 20/40 or better and 22% had a final VA 20/200 or worse. Conclusions In patients with uveal melanoma, preliminary results with brachytherapy using Eye Physics plaques with a treatment plan that delivers 63 Gy to a 2-mm circumferential tumor margin and the tumor apex suggest effective disease control and favorable VA outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David G. Kirsch
- Radiation Oncology
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Johnson TR, Bassil AM, Williams NT, Brundage S, Kent CL, Palmer G, Mowery YM, Oldham M. An investigation of kV mini-GRID spatially fractionated radiation therapy: dosimetry and preclinical trial. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac508c. [PMID: 35100573 PMCID: PMC9167045 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac508c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To develop and characterize novel methods of extreme spatially fractionated kV radiation therapy (including mini-GRID therapy) and to evaluate efficacy in the context of a pre-clinical mouse study.Approach. Spatially fractionated GRIDs were precision-milled from 3 mm thick lead sheets compatible with mounting on a 225 kVp small animal irradiator (X-Rad). Three pencil-beam GRIDs created arrays of 1 mm diameter beams, and three 'bar' GRIDs created 1 × 20 mm rectangular fields. GRIDs projected 20 × 20 mm2fields at isocenter, and beamlets were spaced at 1, 1.25, and 1.5 mm, respectively. Peak-to-valley ratios and dose distributions were evaluated with Gafchromic film. Syngeneic transplant tumors were induced by intramuscular injection of a soft tissue sarcoma cell line into the gastrocnemius muscle of C57BL/6 mice. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to four groups: unirradiated control, conventional irradiation of entire tumor, GRID therapy, and hemi-irradiation (half-beam block, 50% tumor volume treated). All irradiated mice received a single fraction of 15 Gy.Results. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved (bar GRIDs: 11.9 ± 0.9, 13.6 ± 0.4, 13.8 ± 0.5; pencil-beam GRIDs: 18.7 ± 0.6, 26.3 ± 1.5, 31.0 ± 3.3). Pencil-beam GRIDs could theoretically spare more intra-tumor immune cells than bar GRIDs, but they treat less tumor tissue (3%-4% versus 19%-23% area receiving 90% prescription, respectively). Bar GRID and hemi-irradiation treatments significantly delayed tumor growth (P < 0.05), but not as much as a conventional treatment (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in tumor growth delay between GRID and hemi-irradiation.Significance. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved with kV grids: two-to-five times higher than values reported in literature for MV grids. GRID irradiation and hemi-irradiation delayed tumor growth, but neither was as effective as conventional whole tumor uniform dose treatment. Single fraction GRID therapy could not initiate an anti-cancer immune response strong enough to match conventional RT outcomes, but follow-up studies will evaluate the combination of mini-GRID with immune checkpoint blockade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Authors to whomany correspondence should be addressed. , and
| | - Alex M Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Nerissa T Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Simon Brundage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Collin L Kent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Greg Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Authors to whomany correspondence should be addressed. , and
| | - Mark Oldham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Authors to whomany correspondence should be addressed. , and
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Xiao L, Mowery YM, Czito BG, Wu Y, Gao G, Zhai C, Wang J, Wang J. Corrigendum: Brain Metastases from Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:827810. [PMID: 35186759 PMCID: PMC8855502 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Brian G. Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Yajing Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Guangbin Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chang Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jianing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- *Correspondence: Jun Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Karukonda P, Odhiambo D, Mowery YM. Pharmacologic inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 2022; 61:225-238. [PMID: 34964992 PMCID: PMC8799519 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) poses significant treatment challenges, with high recurrence rates for locally advanced disease despite aggressive therapy typically involving a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. HNSCCs commonly exhibit reduced or absent TP53 function due to genomic alterations or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, leading to dependence on the S- and G2/M checkpoints for cell cycle regulation. Both of these checkpoints are activated by Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), which tends to be overexpressed in HNSCC relative to adjacent normal tissues and represents a potentially promising therapeutic target, particularly in combination with other treatments. ATR is a DNA damage signaling kinase that is activated in response to replication stress and single-stranded DNA breaks, such as those induced by radiation therapy and certain chemotherapies. ATR kinase inhibitors are currently being investigated in several clinical trials as part of the management of locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic HNSCC, along with other malignancies. In this review article, we summarize the rationale and preclinical data supporting incorporation of ATR inhibition into therapeutic regimens for HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Karukonda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Diana Odhiambo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mowery YM, Salama JK. Interpreting ORATOR: Lessons Learned From a Randomized Comparison of Primary Surgical and Radiation Approaches for Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:814-817. [PMID: 35077196 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rodrigues A, Loman K, Nawrocki J, Hoang JK, Chang Z, Mowery YM, Oyekunle T, Niedzwiecki D, Brizel DM, Craciunescu O. Establishing ADC-Based Histogram and Texture Features for Early Treatment-Induced Changes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:708398. [PMID: 34540674 PMCID: PMC8444263 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.708398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess baseline variability in histogram and texture features derived from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) examinations and to identify early treatment-induced changes to these features in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing definitive chemoradiation. Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III–IV (7th edition) HNSCC were prospectively enrolled on an IRB-approved study to undergo two pre-treatment baseline DW-MRI examinations, performed 1 week apart, and a third early intra-treatment DW-MRI examination during the second week of chemoradiation. Forty texture and six histogram features were derived from ADC maps. Repeatability of the features from the baseline ADC maps was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared average baseline and early treatment feature changes. Data from nine patients were used for this study. Comparison of the two baseline ADC maps yielded 11 features with an ICC ≥ 0.80, indicating that these features had excellent repeatability: Run Gray-Level Non-Uniformity, Coarseness, Long Zone High Gray-Level, Variance (Histogram Feature), Cluster Shade, Long Zone, Variance (Texture Feature), Run Length Non-Uniformity, Correlation, Cluster Tendency, and ADC Median. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test resulted in four features with significantly different early treatment-induced changes compared to the baseline values: Run Gray-Level Non-Uniformity (p = 0.005), Run Length Non-Uniformity (p = 0.005), Coarseness (p = 0.006), and Variance (Histogram) (p = 0.006). The feasibility of histogram and texture analysis as a potential biomarker is dependent on the baseline variability of each metric, which disqualifies many features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Rodrigues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kelly Loman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jeff Nawrocki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jenny K Hoang
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Taofik Oyekunle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Oana Craciunescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shoghi KI, Badea CT, Blocker SJ, Chenevert TL, Laforest R, Lewis MT, Luker GD, Manning HC, Marcus DS, Mowery YM, Pickup S, Richmond A, Ross BD, Vilgelm AE, Yankeelov TE, Zhou R. Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP): Bridging the Translational Divide to Advance Precision Medicine. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:273-287. [PMID: 32879897 PMCID: PMC7442091 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health’s (National Cancer Institute) precision medicine initiative emphasizes the biological and molecular bases for cancer prevention and treatment. Importantly, it addresses the need for consistency in preclinical and clinical research. To overcome the translational gap in cancer treatment and prevention, the cancer research community has been transitioning toward using animal models that more fatefully recapitulate human tumor biology. There is a growing need to develop best practices in translational research, including imaging research, to better inform therapeutic choices and decision-making. Therefore, the National Cancer Institute has recently launched the Co-Clinical Imaging Research Resource Program (CIRP). Its overarching mission is to advance the practice of precision medicine by establishing consensus-based best practices for co-clinical imaging research by developing optimized state-of-the-art translational quantitative imaging methodologies to enable disease detection, risk stratification, and assessment/prediction of response to therapy. In this communication, we discuss our involvement in the CIRP, detailing key considerations including animal model selection, co-clinical study design, need for standardization of co-clinical instruments, and harmonization of preclinical and clinical quantitative imaging pipelines. An underlying emphasis in the program is to develop best practices toward reproducible, repeatable, and precise quantitative imaging biomarkers for use in translational cancer imaging and therapy. We will conclude with our thoughts on informatics needs to enable collaborative and open science research to advance precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kooresh I Shoghi
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Cristian T Badea
- Department of Radiology, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Stephanie J Blocker
- Department of Radiology, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Richard Laforest
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Michael T Lewis
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Gary D Luker
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - H Charles Manning
- Vanderbilt Center for Molecular Probes-Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Daniel S Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, Durham, NC
| | - Stephen Pickup
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ann Richmond
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Brian D Ross
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anna E Vilgelm
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine, and Oncology, Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX; and.,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Rong Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lafata KJ, Chang Y, Wang C, Mowery YM, Vergalasova I, Niedzwiecki D, Yoo DS, Liu JG, Brizel DM, Yin FF. Intrinsic radiomic expression patterns after 20 Gy demonstrate early metabolic response of oropharyngeal cancers. Med Phys 2021; 48:3767-3777. [PMID: 33959972 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the prognostic potential of intra-treatment PET radiomics data in patients undergoing definitive (chemo) radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) on a prospective clinical trial. We hypothesized that the radiomic expression of OPC tumors after 20 Gy is associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-four patients undergoing definitive (chemo)radiation for OPC were prospectively enrolled on an IRB-approved study. Investigational 18 F-FDG-PET/CT images were acquired prior to treatment and 2 weeks (20 Gy) into a seven-week course of therapy. Fifty-five quantitative radiomic features were extracted from the primary tumor as potential biomarkers of early metabolic response. An unsupervised data clustering algorithm was used to partition patients into clusters based only on their radiomic expression. Clustering results were naïvely compared to residual disease and/or subsequent recurrence and used to derive Kaplan-Meier estimators of RFS. To test whether radiomic expression provides prognostic value beyond conventional clinical features associated with head and neck cancer, multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust radiomic clusters for T and N stage, HPV status, and change in tumor volume. RESULTS While pre-treatment radiomics were not prognostic, intra-treatment radiomic expression was intrinsically associated with both residual/recurrent disease (P = 0.0256, χ 2 test) and RFS (HR = 7.53, 95% CI = 2.54-22.3; P = 0.0201). On univariate Cox analysis, radiomic cluster was associated with RFS (unadjusted HR = 2.70; 95% CI = 1.26-5.76; P = 0.0104) and maintained significance after adjustment for T, N staging, HPV status, and change in tumor volume after 20 Gy (adjusted HR = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.03-7.04; P = 0.0442). The particular radiomic characteristics associated with outcomes suggest that metabolic spatial heterogeneity after 20 Gy portends complete and durable therapeutic response. This finding is independent of baseline metabolic imaging characteristics and clinical features of head and neck cancer, thus providing prognostic advantages over existing approaches. CONCLUSIONS Our data illustrate the prognostic value of intra-treatment metabolic image interrogation, which may potentially guide adaptive therapy strategies for OPC patients and serve as a blueprint for other disease sites. The quality of our study was strengthened by its prospective image acquisition protocol, homogenous patient cohort, relatively long patient follow-up times, and unsupervised clustering formalism that is less prone to hyper-parameter tuning and over-fitting compared to supervised learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle J Lafata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yushi Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Irina Vergalasova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David S Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jian-Guo Liu
- Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Blocker SJ, Cook J, Mowery YM, Everitt JI, Qi Y, Hornburg KJ, Cofer GP, Zapata F, Bassil AM, Badea CT, Kirsch DG, Johnson GA. Ex Vivo MR Histology and Cytometric Feature Mapping Connect Three-dimensional in Vivo MR Images to Two-dimensional Histopathologic Images of Murine Sarcomas. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2021; 3:e200103. [PMID: 34018846 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To establish a platform for quantitative tissue-based interpretation of cytoarchitecture features from tumor MRI measurements. Materials and Methods In a pilot preclinical study, multicontrast in vivo MRI of murine soft-tissue sarcomas in 10 mice, followed by ex vivo MRI of fixed tissues (termed MR histology), was performed. Paraffin-embedded limb cross-sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, digitized, and registered with MRI. Registration was assessed by using binarized tumor maps and Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Quantitative cytometric feature maps from histologic slides were derived by using nuclear segmentation and compared with registered MRI, including apparent diffusion coefficients and transverse relaxation times as affected by magnetic field heterogeneity (T2* maps). Cytometric features were compared with each MR image individually by using simple linear regression analysis to identify the features of interest, and the goodness of fit was assessed on the basis of R2 values. Results Registration of MR images to histopathologic slide images resulted in mean DSCs of 0.912 for ex vivo MR histology and 0.881 for in vivo MRI. Triplicate repeats showed high registration repeatability (mean DSC, >0.9). Whole-slide nuclear segmentations were automated to detect nuclei on histopathologic slides (DSC = 0.8), and feature maps were generated for correlative analysis with MR images. Notable trends were observed between cell density and in vivo apparent diffusion coefficients (best line fit: R2 = 0.96, P < .001). Multiple cytoarchitectural features exhibited linear relationships with in vivo T2* maps, including nuclear circularity (best line fit: R2 = 0.99, P < .001) and variance in nuclear circularity (best line fit: R2 = 0.98, P < .001). Conclusion An infrastructure for registering and quantitatively comparing in vivo tumor MRI with traditional histologic analysis was successfully implemented in a preclinical pilot study of soft-tissue sarcomas. Keywords: MRI, Pathology, Animal Studies, Tissue Characterization Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Blocker
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - James Cook
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Jeffrey I Everitt
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Yi Qi
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Kathryn J Hornburg
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Gary P Cofer
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Fernando Zapata
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Alex M Bassil
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Cristian T Badea
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - David G Kirsch
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| | - G Allan Johnson
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.J.B., J.C., Y.Q., K.H., G.P.C., F.Z., C.T.B., G.A.J.), Radiation Oncology (Y.M.M., A.M.B., D.G.K.), and Pathology (J.I.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Dr, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Xiao L, Mowery YM, Czito BG, Wu Y, Gao G, Zhai C, Wang J, Wang J. Brain Metastases from Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652509. [PMID: 33996573 PMCID: PMC8117143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Due to the low incidence of intracranial disease among patients with esophageal cancer (EC), optimal management for these patients has not been established. The aim of this real-world study is to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with brain metastases in order to provide a reference for treatment and associated outcomes of these patients. Methods Patients with ESCC treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2009 and May 31,2020 were identified in an institutional tumor registry. Patients with brain metastases were included for further analysis and categorized by treatment received. Survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among 19,225 patients with ESCC, 66 (0.34%) were diagnosed with brain metastases. Five patients were treated with surgery, 40 patients were treated with radiotherapy, 10 with systemic therapy alone, and 15 with supportive care alone. The median follow-up time was 7.3 months (95% CI 7.4-11.4). At last follow-up, 59 patients are deceased and 7 patients are alive. Median overall survival (OS) from time of brain metastases diagnosis was 7.6 months (95% CI 5.3-9.9) for all cases. For patients who received locoregional treatment, median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI 7.4-14.3), and survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 75.6% and 37.2%, respectively. For patients without locoregional treatment, median OS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.5-3.5), and survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 32% and 24%, respectively. OS was significantly improved for patients who received locoregional treatment compared to those treated with systematic treatment alone or supportive care (HR: 2.761, 95% CI 1.509-5.053, P=0.001). The median OS of patients with graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score 0-2 was 6.4 months, compared to median OS of 12.3 months for patients with GPA >2 (HR: 0.507, 95% CI 0.283-0.911). Conclusion Brain metastases are rare in patients with ESCC. GPA score maybe a useful prognostic tool for ESCC patients with brain metastases. Receipt of locoregional treatment including brain surgery and radiotherapy was associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Yajing Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Guangbin Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chang Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jianing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jacobs CD, Williamson H, Barak I, Rocke DJ, Kahmke RR, Suneja G, Mowery YM. Postoperative radiotherapy is associated with improved overall survival for alveolar ridge squamous cell carcinoma with adverse pathologic features. Head Neck 2021; 43:203-211. [PMID: 32969107 PMCID: PMC9113753 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alveolar ridge squamous cell carcinoma (ARSCC) is poorly represented in randomized trials. METHODS Adults in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with ARSCC between 2010 and 2014 who should be considered for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined risk factors were identified. RESULTS Eight hundred forty-five (58%) of 1457 patients meeting the inclusion criteria received PORT. PORT was associated with improved overall survival (OS) on unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.98, P = .02) and multivariable (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.94, P = .002) analyses. PORT was associated with significantly improved 5-year OS for patients with 1 (68% vs 58%, P < .001), 2 (52% vs 31%, P < .001), and ≥3 (38% vs 24%, P < .001) NCCN-defined risk factors. Prognostic variables significantly associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis included advanced age, primary tumor size ≥3 cm, high grade, positive margin(s), stage N2-3, level IV/V nodal metastasis, and extranodal extension. CONCLUSION PORT for resected ARSCC with adverse pathologic features is associated with significantly improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corbin D. Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hannah Williamson
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ian Barak
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel J. Rocke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Russel R. Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wisdom AJ, Mowery YM, Hong CS, Himes JE, Nabet BY, Qin X, Zhang D, Chen L, Fradin H, Patel R, Bassil AM, Muise ES, King DA, Xu ES, Carpenter DJ, Kent CL, Smythe KS, Williams NT, Luo L, Ma Y, Alizadeh AA, Owzar K, Diehn M, Bradley T, Kirsch DG. Single cell analysis reveals distinct immune landscapes in transplant and primary sarcomas that determine response or resistance to immunotherapy. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6410. [PMID: 33335088 PMCID: PMC7746723 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19917-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy fails to cure most cancer patients. Preclinical studies indicate that radiotherapy synergizes with immunotherapy, promoting radiation-induced antitumor immunity. Most preclinical immunotherapy studies utilize transplant tumor models, which overestimate patient responses. Here, we show that transplant sarcomas are cured by PD-1 blockade and radiotherapy, but identical treatment fails in autochthonous sarcomas, which demonstrate immunoediting, decreased neoantigen expression, and tumor-specific immune tolerance. We characterize tumor-infiltrating immune cells from transplant and primary tumors, revealing striking differences in their immune landscapes. Although radiotherapy remodels myeloid cells in both models, only transplant tumors are enriched for activated CD8+ T cells. The immune microenvironment of primary murine sarcomas resembles most human sarcomas, while transplant sarcomas resemble the most inflamed human sarcomas. These results identify distinct microenvironments in murine sarcomas that coevolve with the immune system and suggest that patients with a sarcoma immune phenotype similar to transplant tumors may benefit most from PD-1 blockade and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J Wisdom
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
| | - Cierra S Hong
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Jonathon E Himes
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Barzin Y Nabet
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - Xiaodi Qin
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | | | - Lan Chen
- Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, USA
| | - Hélène Fradin
- Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Rutulkumar Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Alex M Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | | | - Daniel A King
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Eric S Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - David J Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Collin L Kent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | | | - Nerissa T Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Lixia Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Ash A Alizadeh
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Todd Bradley
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hong JC, Eclov NCW, Dalal NH, Thomas SM, Stephens SJ, Malicki M, Shields S, Cobb A, Mowery YM, Niedzwiecki D, Tenenbaum JD, Palta M. System for High-Intensity Evaluation During Radiation Therapy (SHIELD-RT): A Prospective Randomized Study of Machine Learning–Directed Clinical Evaluations During Radiation and Chemoradiation. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3652-3661. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing outpatient radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) frequently require acute care (emergency department evaluation or hospitalization). Machine learning (ML) may guide interventions to reduce this risk. There are limited prospective studies investigating the clinical impact of ML in health care. The objective of this study was to determine whether ML can identify high-risk patients and direct mandatory twice-weekly clinical evaluation to reduce acute care visits during treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS During this single-institution randomized quality improvement study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04277650 ), 963 outpatient adult courses of RT and CRT started from January 7 to June 30, 2019, were evaluated by an ML algorithm. Among these, 311 courses identified by ML as high risk (> 10% risk of acute care during treatment) were randomized to standard once-weekly clinical evaluation (n = 157) or mandatory twice-weekly evaluation (n = 154). Both arms allowed additional evaluations on the basis of clinician discretion. The primary end point was the rate of acute care visits during RT. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) and decile calibration plots. RESULTS Twice-weekly evaluation reduced rates of acute care during treatment from 22.3% to 12.3% (difference, −10.0%; 95% CI, −18.3 to −1.6; relative risk, 0.556; 95% CI, 0.332 to 0.924; P = .02). Low-risk patients had a 2.7% acute care rate. Model discrimination was good in high- and low-risk patients undergoing standard once-weekly evaluation (AUC, 0.851). CONCLUSION In this prospective randomized study, ML accurately triaged patients undergoing RT and CRT, directing clinical management with reduced acute care rates versus standard of care. This prospective study demonstrates the potential benefit of ML in health care and offers opportunities to enhance care quality and reduce health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian C. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Nicole H. Dalal
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Samantha M. Thomas
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mary Malicki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Stacey Shields
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Alyssa Cobb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Price JG, Spiegel DY, Yoo DS, Moravan MJ, Mowery YM, Niedzwiecki D, Brizel DM, Salama JK. Development and Implementation of an Educational Simulation Workshop in Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy for Radiation Oncology Residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:615-619. [PMID: 32417408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) is a critical tool for the diagnosis, staging, assessment of treatment response, and detection of recurrence for head and neck (H&N) malignancies. No standardized recommendations exist for procedural FOL education in radiation oncology. We therefore implemented a pilot simulation workshop to train radiation oncology residents in pertinent H&N anatomy and FOL technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 2-phase workshop and simulation session was designed. Residents initially received a lecture on H&N anatomy and the logistics of the FOL examination. Subsequently, residents had a practical session in which they performed FOL in 2 simulated environments: a computerized FOL program and mannequin-based practice. Site-specific attending physicians were present to provide real-time guidance and education. Pre- and postworkshop surveys were administered to the participants to determine the impact of the workshop. Subsequently, postgraduate year (PGY)-2 residents were required to complete 6 supervised FOL examinations in clinic and were provided immediate feedback. RESULTS Annual workshops were performed in 2017 to 2019. The survey completion rate was 14 of 18 (78%). Participants ranged from fourth-year medical students to PGY-2 to PGY-5 residents. All PGY-2 residents completed their 6 supervised FOL examinations. On a 5-point Likert scale, mean H&N anatomy knowledge increased from 2.4 to 3.7 (standard deviation = 0.6, P < .0001). Similarly, mean FOL procedural skill confidence increased from 2.2 to 3.3 (standard deviation = 0.7, P < .0001). These effects were limited to novice (fourth-year medical students to PGY-2) participants. All participants found the exercise clinically informative. CONCLUSIONS A simulation-based workshop for teaching FOL procedural skills increased confidence and procedural expertise of new radiation oncology residents and translated directly to supervised clinical encounters. Adoption of this type of program may help to improve resident training in H&N cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy G Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
| | | | - David S Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael J Moravan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Stephens SJ, Chino F, Williamson H, Niedzwiecki D, Chino J, Mowery YM. Evaluating for disparities in place of death for head and neck cancer patients in the United States utilizing the CDC WONDER database. Oral Oncol 2020; 102:104555. [PMID: 32006782 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate trends in place of death for patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) in the U.S. from 1999 to 2017 based on the CDC WONDER (Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database. MATERIALS/METHODS Using patient-level data from 2015 and aggregate data from 1999 to 2017, multivariable logistic regression analyses (MLR) were performed to evaluate for disparities in place of death. RESULTS We obtained aggregate data for 101,963 people who died of HNC between 1999 and 2017 (25.9% oral cavity, 24.6% oropharynx/pharynx, 0.4% nasopharynx, and 49.1% larynx/hypopharynx). Most were Caucasian (92.7%) and male (87.0%). Deaths at home or hospice increased over the study period (R2 = 0.96, p < 0.05) from 29.2% in 1999 to 61.2% in 2017. On MLR of patient-level data from 2015, those who were single (ref), ages 85+ (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.90), African American (OR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.82), or Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.81) were less likely to die at home or hospice. On MLR of the aggregate data (1999-2017), those who were female (OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.91) or ages 75-84 (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.82) were also less likely to die at home or hospice. In both analyses, those who died from larynx/hypopharynx cancers were less likely to die at home or hospice. CONCLUSIONS HNC-related deaths at home or hospice increased between 1999 and 2017. Those who were single, female, African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, older (ages 75+), or those with larynx/hypopharynx cancers were less likely to die at home or hospice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Hannah Williamson
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 2717, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 2717, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Junzo Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mowery YM, Patel K, Chowdhary M, Rushing CN, Roy Choudhury K, Lowe JR, Olson AC, Wisdom AJ, Salama JK, Hanks BA, Khan MK, Salama AKS. Retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy and radiation therapy in advanced melanoma: A bi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2019; 138:114-120. [PMID: 31252292 PMCID: PMC7566286 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) are standard treatments for advanced melanoma. Palliative radiation therapy (RT) is commonly administered for this disease. Safety and optimal timing for this combination for melanoma has not been established. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, records for melanoma patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy at Duke University or Emory University (1/1/2013-12/30/2015) were reviewed. Patients were categorized by receipt of RT and RT timing relative to anti-PD-1. RESULTS 151 patients received anti-PD-1 therapy. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. Patients receiving RT (n = 85) had worse baseline prognostic factors than patients without RT (n = 66). One-year overall survival (OS) was lower for RT patients than patients without RT (66%, 95% CI: 55-77% vs 83%, 95% CI: 73-92%). One-year OS was 61% for patients receiving RT before anti-PD-1 (95% CI: 46-76%), 78% for RT during anti-PD-1 (95% CI: 60-95%), and 58% for RT after anti-PD-1 (95% CI: 26-89%). On Cox regression, OS for patients without RT did not differ significantly from patients receiving RT during anti-PD-1 (HR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.41-2.84) or RT before anti-PD-1 (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.21-1.45). RT and anti-PD-1 therapy administered within 6 weeks of each other was well tolerated. CONCLUSION RT can be safely administered with anti-PD-1 therapy. Despite worse baseline prognostic characteristics for patients receiving RT, OS was similar for patients receiving concurrent RT with anti-PD-1 therapy compared to patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Kirtesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
| | - Mudit Chowdhary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
| | - Christel N Rushing
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Kingshuk Roy Choudhury
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States; Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Jared R Lowe
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Adam C Olson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Amy J Wisdom
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States.
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Brent A Hanks
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| | - Mohammad K Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
| | - April K S Salama
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lee CL, Mowery YM, Daniel AR, Zhang D, Sibley AB, Delaney JR, Wisdom AJ, Qin X, Wang X, Caraballo I, Gresham J, Luo L, Van Mater D, Owzar K, Kirsch DG. Mutational landscape in genetically engineered, carcinogen-induced, and radiation-induced mouse sarcoma. JCI Insight 2019; 4:128698. [PMID: 31112524 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.128698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer development is influenced by hereditary mutations, somatic mutations due to random errors in DNA replication, or external factors. It remains unclear how distinct cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors impact oncogenesis within the same tissue type. We investigated murine soft tissue sarcomas generated by oncogenic alterations (KrasG12D activation and p53 deletion), carcinogens (3-methylcholanthrene [MCA] or ionizing radiation), and in a novel model combining both factors (MCA plus p53 deletion). Whole-exome sequencing demonstrated distinct mutational signatures in individual sarcoma cohorts. MCA-induced sarcomas exhibited high mutational burden and predominantly G-to-T transversions, while radiation-induced sarcomas exhibited low mutational burden and a distinct genetic signature characterized by C-to-T transitions. The indel to substitution ratio and amount of gene copy number variations were high for radiation-induced sarcomas. MCA-induced tumors generated on a p53-deficient background showed the highest genomic instability. MCA-induced sarcomas harbored mutations in putative cancer-driver genes that regulate MAPK signaling (Kras and Nf1) and the Hippo pathway (Fat1 and Fat4). In contrast, radiation-induced sarcomas and KrasG12Dp53-/- sarcomas did not harbor recurrent oncogenic mutations, rather they exhibited amplifications of specific oncogenes: Kras and Myc in KrasG12Dp53-/- sarcomas, and Met and Yap1 for radiation-induced sarcomas. These results reveal that different initiating events drive oncogenesis through distinct mechanisms.
Collapse
|
50
|
Jacobs CD, Barak I, Mehta K, Agassi AM, Jung SH, Suneja G, Brizel DM, Mowery YM. Utilization of Brachytherapy for Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancers in the United States. Brachytherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|