Quality initiatives related to moderately preterm, late preterm, and early term births

Increasing Exclusive Nursery Care of Late Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Late preterm (LPT) and low birth weight (LBW) infants are populations at increased risk for NICU admission, partly due to feeding-related conditions. This study was aimed to increase the percentage of LPT and LBW infants receiving exclusive nursery care using quality improvement methodologies.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team implemented interventions at a single academic center. Included infants were 35 to 36 weeks gestational age and term infants with birth weights <2500 g admitted from the delivery room to the nursery. Drivers of change included feeding protocol, knowledge, and care standardization. We used statistical process control charts to track data over time. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants receiving exclusive nursery care. Secondary outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia, phototherapy, and average weight loss. Balancing measures were exclusive breast milk feeding rates and length of stay.

RESULTS

Included infants totaled 1336. The percentage of LPT and LBW infants receiving exclusive nursery care increased from 83.9% to 88.8% with special cause variation starting 1 month into the postintervention period. Reduction in neonatal hypoglycemia, 51.7% to 45.1%, coincided. Among infants receiving exclusive nursery care, phototherapy, weight loss, exclusive breast milk feeding, and length of stay had no special cause variation.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions involving a nursery feeding protocol, knowledge, and standardization of care for LPT and LBW infants were associated with increased exclusive nursery care (4.9%) and reduced rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (6.6%) without adverse effects. This quality initiative allowed for the preservation of the mother-infant dyad using high-value care.

Early-term birth and its association with universal two-child policy: a national cross-sectional study in China

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiology of early-term birth (ETB) at the national level in China, and explore the association and mediating factors between ETB and policy between universal two-child policy and ETB, so as to explain the potential reason for such a relationship and provide evidence for future ETB interventions in the era of the new birth control policy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

The cross-sectional study used data from China Labour and Delivery Survey between 2015 and 2016. A total of 75 132 survey data collected from 89 hospitals in 25 provinces were included in the analysis. We further explored the association between the universal two-child policy and ETB.

RESULTS

The weighted incidence of ETB was 30.1 per 100 all births (95% CI 30.06% to 30.14%) or 29.88 per 100 live births (95% CI 29.97% to 30.05%) between 2015 and 2016 in China. There was an association between the universal two-child policy and ETB (relative risk, RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.23), which was not mediated by maternal age (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.22), previous uterine scars (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.22), parity (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.24) and other measured conditions (each p<0.05). Stratified analysis showed that the association between universal two-child policy and ETB were the strongest in multiparous young women or women without previous uterine scars (each p<0.05), and disappeared in all women of advanced maternal age (each p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ETB was high in China when compared with most of reported countries, and there might be a link between two-child policy and ETB. Obstetric practice such as selective induced labour and caesarean section should be revised with ETB risks in mind, when ETB is more likely to happen under the universal two-child policy. Preventing ETB should not be neglected in multiparous young women or those without previous uterine scars under the new policy.

The effect of thermoregulation quality improvement initiatives on the admission temperature of premature/very low birth-weight infants in neonatal intensive care units: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to ascertain the impact of thermoregulation quality improvement initiatives (QIs) on the admission temperatures of premature/very-low-birth-weight infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS

A systematic search of databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library was carried out. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were adhered to, with no publication date limitations added. The chosen studies were examined for quality, data were extracted and analysed, before a narrative synthesis was performed. The last search occurred on January 7, 2019, with PRISMA flow diagrams completed for identified studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies of varying methodology design were included in this review. Variations of thermoregulation interventions were included in the 10 studies. Nevertheless, all of them demonstrated that admission temperature rates can be significantly improved by implementing a thermoregulation QI. The multidisciplinary team and ongoing education were seen as much needed components to the overall sustainability, and continuing success of the QI's.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

This systematic review determines that thermoregulation QIs can positively impact the admission temperatures of premature/very-low-birth-weight infants in the NICU. Prevention of hypothermia is aimed at reducing the risks of developing major neonatal morbidities. The pooling of the results from the 10 studies helps in the sharing of outcome measures and thus, improving quantitative synthesis. More frequent monitoring of the axillary temperature would help in preventing hypothermia and hyperthermia occurring. Ongoing education and staff training are essential for managing thermoregulation successfully. Examining the compliance rates to such quality initiatives, and the variations in interventions would benefit from further research to ensure better standardisation of clinical practice.

Late preterm: a new high risk group in neonatology

Late preterm infants are those infants born between 34 0/7 weeks through 36 6/7 week of gestation. These are physiologically less mature and have limited compensatory responses to the extrauterine environment compared with term infants. Despite their increased risk for morbidity and mortality, late preterm newborns are often cared in the well-baby nurseries of hospital after birth and are discharged from the hospital by 2-3 days of postnatal age. They are usually treated like developmentally mature term infants because many of them are of same birth weight and same size as term infants. There is a steady increase in the late preterm birth rate in last decade because of either maternal, fetal, or placental/uterine causes. There has been shift in the distribution of births from term and post-term toward earlier gestations. Although late preterm infants are the largest subgroup of preterm infants, there has been little research on this group until recently. This is mainly because of labeling them as "near-term". Such infants were being looked upon as "almost mature", and were thought as neonate requiring either no or minimal concern. In the obstetric and pediatric practice, late preterm infants are often considered functionally and developmentally mature and often managed by protocols developed for full-term infants. Thus, limited efforts are taken to prolong pregnancy in cases of preterm labor beyond 34 weeks, moreover after 34 weeks most centers do not administer antenatal prophylactic steroids. These practices are based on previous studies reporting neonatal mortality and morbidity in the late preterm period to be only slightly higher in comparison with term infants and whereas in the current scenario the difference is significant. Late preterm infants have 2-3-fold increased risk of morbidities such as hypothermia, hypoglycemia, delayed lung fluid clearance, respiratory distress, poor feeding, jaundice, sepsis, and readmission rates after initial hospital discharge. This leads to huge impact on the overall health care resources. In this review, we cover various aspects of these late preterm infants like etiology, immediate and long-term outcome.

The History and State of Neonatal Nursing Quality Improvement Practice and Education

Quality improvement has evolved rapidly in neonatal nursing. This review outlines the history and current state of quality improvement practice and education in neonatal nursing. The future of neonatal nursing includes a stronger emphasis on quality improvement in advanced practice education that promotes doctoral projects that result in clinical improvements. A collective focus will ensure that neonatal nurses not only deliver evidence-based care, but also continually improve the care they deliver.

Systematic Review of Quality Improvement Initiatives Related to Cue-Based Feeding in Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVE

To examine and synthesize the outcomes of quality improvement (QI) initiatives related to cue-based feeding of preterm infants to facilitate implementation of findings to improve nursing practice.

DATA SOURCES

Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and PubMed were searched for full-text articles published from 2000 through 2017 included under the medical subject heading quality improvement and whose titles included any form of the term feeding combined with any of the following: bottle, breast, cue-based, demand, infant, neonate, newborn, oral, or responsive.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were considered for inclusion if they were published in English-language journals and focused on QI initiatives concerning cue-based feeding of preterm infants in NICU settings.

DATA EXTRACTION

After initial article review, we examined clinical outcomes and assessed study methodology using the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) framework.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Our review yielded seven studies related to cue-based feeding of preterm infants. Five studies included multidisciplinary stakeholder teams to assess their respective NICU environments and facilitate project completion. In two studies, feeding "champions" were designated as facilitators. In one study, researchers used a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach and emphasized process over outcome. In six studies, researchers measured hospital length of stay, which decreased in five intervention groups. In three studies, researchers measured infant weight gain, which increased in two intervention groups. In two studies, researchers monitored weight gain velocity, and in five studies, researchers reported earlier gestational attainment of full oral feedings.

CONCLUSION

Weight gain, time to full oral feedings, and hospital length of stay may be improved with the use of cue-based feeding. QI initiatives are a practical means to bring best evidence and multidisciplinary collaboration to the NICU.

Human milk and necrotizing enterocolitis

NEC is a multifactorial disease that occurs when multiple risk factors and/or stressors overlap, leading to profound inflammation and intestinal injury. Human milk feedings, both from the infant's mother and donor human milk, have been associated with reductions in NEC in preterm infants. This article will review the protective factors in human milk, clinical studies of human milk and NEC, and practices to enhance human milk use in neonatal intensive care units.

Eliminating Undesirable Variation in Neonatal Practice: Balancing Standardization and Customization

Consistency of care and elimination of unnecessary and harmful variation are underemphasized aspects of health care quality. This article describes the prevalence and patterns of practice variation in health care and neonatology; discusses the potential role of standardization as a solution to eliminating wasteful and harmful practice variation, particularly when it is founded on principles of evidence-based medicine; and proposes ways to balance standardization and customization of practice to ultimately improve the quality of neonatal care.

Temporal Trends in Late Preterm and Early Term Birth Rates in 6 High-Income Countries in North America and Europe and Association With Clinician-Initiated Obstetric Interventions

IMPORTANCE

Clinicians have been urged to delay the use of obstetric interventions (eg, labor induction, cesarean delivery) until 39 weeks or later in the absence of maternal or fetal indications for intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To describe recent trends in late preterm and early term birth rates in 6 high-income countries and assess association with use of clinician-initiated obstetric interventions.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of singleton live births from 2006 to the latest available year (ranging from 2010 to 2015) in Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United States.

EXPOSURES

Use of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention (either labor induction or prelabor cesarean delivery) during delivery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Annual country-specific late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early term (37-38 weeks) birth rates.

RESULTS

The study population included 2,415,432 Canadian births in 2006-2014 (4.8% late preterm; 25.3% early term); 305,947 Danish births in 2006-2010 (3.6% late preterm; 18.8% early term); 571,937 Finnish births in 2006-2015 (3.3% late preterm; 16.8% early term); 468,954 Norwegian births in 2006-2013 (3.8% late preterm; 17.2% early term); 737,754 Swedish births in 2006-2012 (3.6% late preterm; 18.7% early term); and 25,788,558 US births in 2006-2014 (6.0% late preterm; 26.9% early term). Late preterm birth rates decreased in Norway (3.9% to 3.5%) and the United States (6.8% to 5.7%). Early term birth rates decreased in Norway (17.6% to 16.8%), Sweden (19.4% to 18.5%), and the United States (30.2% to 24.4%). In the United States, early term birth rates decreased from 33.0% in 2006 to 21.1% in 2014 among births with clinician-initiated obstetric intervention, and from 29.7% in 2006 to 27.1% in 2014 among births without clinician-initiated obstetric intervention. Rates of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention increased among late preterm births in Canada (28.0% to 37.9%), Denmark (22.2% to 25.0%), and Finland (25.1% to 38.5%), and among early term births in Denmark (38.4% to 43.8%) and Finland (29.8% to 40.1%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Between 2006 and 2014, late preterm and early term birth rates decreased in the United States, and an association was observed between early term birth rates and decreasing clinician-initiated obstetric interventions. Late preterm births also decreased in Norway, and early term births decreased in Norway and Sweden. Clinician-initiated obstetric interventions increased in some countries but no association was found with rates of late preterm or early term birth.

Obstetric Ultrasound Efficiency and Accuracy Using a Protocol-Based Examination

OBJECTIVES

Obstetric ultrasound imaging requires the acquisition of a standard set of maternal and fetal images. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of implementation of a protocol-based ultrasound examination on the duration of ultrasound examinations, examination completion, and accuracy of documentation.

METHODS

We conducted a case-cohort study. Obstetric ultrasound examinations performed in the first, second, and third trimesters were reviewed before and after implementation of a protocol-based ultrasound examination. The duration of the ultrasound examination, number of missing required images, and documentation of missing images were abstracted from an image archival system. To account for clustering by sonographer, 3 mixed effects models with a fixed effect for protocol and a random intercept for sonographer were used to evaluate the effect on the total time of the examination, number of missing images, and whether missing images were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 100 ultrasound examinations were compared: 50 before and 50 after implementation of the protocol. Statistically significant differences between outcomes before and after protocol implementation were observed for all outcomes. After implementation of the protocol, the average duration of ultrasound examinations decreased by 7.62 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.57-11.68 minutes); the number of missing images was reduced by 5.81 per examination (95% CI, 4.24-7.39); and proper documentation of missing images increased by 40.24% (95% CI, 22.77%-57.71%).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a software protocol-based ultrasound examination significantly improved the efficiency and accuracy of obstetric ultrasound examinations in this study.

Early term infants are at increased risk of requiring neonatal intensive care

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence is demonstrating that infants born early on during the term period are at increased risk of morbidity compared with infants born closer to a complete 40 week gestational pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to compare early term [gestation age (GA): 37-37 6/7 weeks] neonatal outcomes with those of other full term neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all term infants admitted to the NICU at New York University Langone Medical Center over a 17 month period. Subjects were grouped and analyzed according to their GA at birth: 1) early term infants (GA between 37 0/7 to 37 6/7 weeks) and 2) other term infants (38 0/7 weeks and older).

RESULTS

Early term infants were more likely to require NICU care than other term infants [relative risk: 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.07-1.88), P=0.01]. In the NICU, they are more likely to manifest respiratory distress syndrome [odds ratio (OR)=5.7, 95% CI=1.6-19.8, P<0.01] and hypoglycemia (OR=4.6, 95% CI=2.0-10.4, P<0.001). In addition, early term neonates were more likely to be born via elective cesarean section than other term neonates (OR=4.1, 95% CI=2.0-8.5, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Being born at early term is associated with increased risk of respiratory disease and hypoglycemia requiring neonatal intensive care. Further efforts directed at decreasing early term deliveries may be warranted.