Acute kidney injury during colistin therapy: a prospective study in patients with extensively-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

Current Therapeutic Approaches for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

The treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections remains a challenge for physicians worldwide in the 21st century. The bacterium possesses a multitude of mechanisms to escape the human immune system. The consequences of A. baumannii infections on morbidity and mortality, as well on financial resources, remain dire. Furthermore, A. baumannii superinfections have also occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. While prevention is important, the antibiotic armamentarium remains the most essential factor for the treatment of these infections. The main problem is the notorious resistance profile (including resistance to carbapenems and colistin) that this bacterium exhibits. While newer beta lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors have entered clinical practice, with excellent results against various infections due to Enterobacteriaceae, their contribution against A. baumannii infections is almost absent. Hence, we have to resort to at least one of the following, sulbactam, polymyxins E or B, tigecycline or aminoglycosides, against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii infections. Furthermore, the notable addition of cefiderocol in the fight against A. baumannii infections represents a useful addition. We present herein the existing information from the last decade regarding therapeutic advances against MDR/XDR A. baumannii infections.

Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and its impact on patient outcomes among adult hospitalized patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections who received targeted treatment with a newer β-lactam or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor-, polymyxin- or aminoglycoside-containing regimen

BACKGROUND

Limited comparative data exist on acute kidney injury (AKI) risk and AKI-associated outcomes in hospitalized patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections (CR-GNIs) treated with a newer β-lactam/β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BL-BLI)-, polymyxin (PB)- or aminoglycoside (AG)-containing regimen. This study quantified the risk of AKI and AKI-related outcomes among patients with CR-GNIs treated with a newer BL/BL-BLI-, PB- or AG-containing regimen.

METHODS

A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was performed (2016-20). The study included adult hospitalized patients with (i) baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2; (ii) CR-GN pneumonia, complicated urinary tract infection or bloodstream infection; and (iii) receipt of newer BL/BL-BLI, PG or AG within 7 days of index CR-GN culture for ≥3 days. Outcomes included AKI, in-hospital mortality and hospital costs.

RESULTS

The study included 750 patients and most (48%) received a newer BL/BL-BLI. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 8 (5-11), 5 (4-8) and 7 (4-8) days in the newer BL/BL-BLI group, AG group and PB group, respectively. The PB group had the highest adjusted AKI incidence (95% CI) (PB: 25.1% (15.6%-34.6%) versus AG: 8.9% (5.7%-12.2%) versus newer BL/BL-BLI: 11.9% (8.1%-15.7%); P = 0.001). Patients with AKI had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (AKI: 18.5% versus 'No AKI': 5.6%; P = 0.001) and mean hospital costs (AKI: $49 192 versus 'No AKI': $38,763; P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

The AKI incidence was highest among PB patients and patients with AKI had worse outcomes. Healthcare systems should consider minimizing the use of antibiotics that augment AKI risk as a measure to improve outcomes in patients with CR-GNIs.

Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) remain a clinical challenge due to limited treatment options. Recently, cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, and sulbactam-durlobactam, a bactericidal β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of and resistance to cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. baumannii isolates to these drugs, as well as the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol and sulbactam/durlobactam-based regimens against CRAB. Overall, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam show an excellent antimicrobial activity against CRAB. The review of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol therapy against CRAB indicates it is non-inferior to colistin/other treatments for CRAB infections, with a better safety profile. Combination treatment is not associated with improved outcomes compared to monotherapy. Higher mortality rates are often associated with prior patient comorbidities and the severity of the underlying infection. Regarding sulbactam-durlobactam, current data from the pivotal clinical trial and case reports suggest this antibiotic combination could be a valuable option in critically ill patients affected by CRAB infections, in particular where no other antibiotic appears to be effective.

How to treat severe Acinetobacter baumannii infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the management of severe Acinetobacter baumannii infections (ABI), particularly those caused by multi-resistant isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

The in vitro activity of the various antimicrobial agents potentially helpful in treating ABI is highly variable and has progressively decreased for many of them, limiting current therapeutic options. The combination of more than one drug is still advisable in most circumstances. Ideally, two active first-line drugs should be used. Alternatively, a first-line and a second-line drug and, if this is not possible, two or more second-line drugs in combination. The emergence of new agents such as Cefiderocol, the combination of Sulbactam and Durlobactam, and the new Tetracyclines offer therapeutic options that need to be supported by clinical evidence.

SUMMARY

The apparent limitations in treating infections caused by this bacterium, the rapid development of resistance, and the serious underlying situation in most cases invite the search for alternatives to antibiotic treatment, the most promising of which seems to be bacteriophage therapy.

Efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial (ATTACK)

BACKGROUND

An urgent need exists for antibiotics to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Acinetobacter, including multidrug-resistant strains. In a phase 3, pathogen-specific, randomised controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin, both in combination with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC.

METHODS

The ATTACK trial was done at 59 clinical sites in 16 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with ABC-confirmed hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, ventilated pneumonia, or bloodstream infections were randomised 1:1 using a block size of four to sulbactam-durlobactam (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 3 h every 6 h) or colistin (2·5 mg/kg over 30 min every 12 h) for 7-14 days. All patients received imipenem-cilastatin (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 1 h every 6 h) as background therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC (the carbapenem-resistant ABC microbiologically modified intention-to-treat population). Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference was less than +20%. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of nephrotoxicity assessed using modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease criteria measured by creatinine level or glomerular filtration rate through day 42. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03894046.

FINDINGS

Between Sep 5, 2019, and July 26, 2021, 181 patients were randomly assigned to sulbactam-durlobactam or colistin (176 hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, or ventilated pneumonia; and five bloodstream infections); 125 patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC isolates were included in the primary efficacy analysis. 28-day all-cause mortality was 12 (19%) of 63 in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 20 (32%) of 62 in the colistin group, a difference of -13·2% (95% CI -30·0 to 3·5), which met criteria for non-inferiority. Incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly (p<0·001) lower with sulbactam-durlobactam than colistin (12 [13%] of 91 vs 32 [38%] of 85). Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (40%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 42 (49%) of 86 patients in the colistin group. Treatment-related adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in ten (11%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 14 (16%) of 86 patients in the colistin group.

INTERPRETATION

Our data show that sulbactam-durlobactam was non-inferior to colistin, both agents given in combination with imipenem-cilastatin, for the primary endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality. Sulbactam-durlobactam was well tolerated and could be an effective intervention to reduce mortality from serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC, including multidrug-resistant strains.

FUNDING

Entasis Therapeutics and Zai Lab.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Critical Reappraisal

Multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is emerging as a major threat related to adverse patient outcomes. The goal of this review is to describe evidence-based empiric and targeted treatment regimens that can be exploited when dealing with suspected or confirmed infections due to MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa has inherent resistance to many drug classes, the capacity to form biofilms, and most importantly, the ability to quickly acquire resistance to ongoing treatments. Based on the presence of risk factors for MDR/XDR infections and local epidemiology, where large proportions of strains are resistant to classic beta-lactams, the recommended empirical treatment for suspected P. aeruginosa infections is based on ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam. Where local epidemiology indicates low rates of MDR/XDR and there are no risk factors, a third or fourth generation cephalosporin can be used in the context of a "carbapenem-sparing" strategy. Whenever feasible, antibiotic de-escalation is recommended after antimicrobial susceptibility tests suggest that it is appropriate, and de-escalation is based on different resistance mechanisms. Cefiderocol and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam withstand most resistance mechanisms and may remain active in cases with resistance to other new antibiotics. Confronting the growing threat of MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa, treatment choices should be wise, sparing newer antibiotics when dealing with a suspected/confirmed susceptible P. aeruginosa strain and choosing the right option for MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa based on specific types and resistance mechanisms.

Clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol for resistant Gram-negative infections: a real-life, single-centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Cefiderocol is a 'siderophore' cephalosporin active against Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. Data on the use of cefiderocol in real life are limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol in the context of our hospital clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, observational, retrospective clinical study. We collected data for all patients who received cefiderocol therapy in our hospital, with a focus on clinical outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 28 patients, with a median age of 73 years (25-83 years) and a high burden of co-morbidities. Up to 45 Gram-negative isolates were cultured from the study patients, the most common pathogen being Acinetobacter baumannii (31.1%). Cefiderocol was mostly prescribed for pneumonia (37.8% of cases), bloodstream infection (24.4%), urinary tract infection (22.2%) and intra-abdominal infection (20%), and largely as salvage therapy (92.8%). Of the 18 patients for whom follow-up cultures were available, 14 (77.8%) achieved eradication of the causative micro-organism. Therapeutic success (improvement/resolution of infection) occurred in 64.3% of cases at 7 days and 50% at 14 days from treatment start. Treatment failed in 9 cases (32.1%). No effects on kidney, liver or bone marrow function were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol showed fair efficacy and excellent tolerability in highly co-morbid patients with a range of multiresistant infections. It may be an option for infections due to colistin-resistant pathogens, when other regimens fail or in cases at risk of kidney dysfunction.

Next-Generation Polymyxin Class of Antibiotics: A Ray of Hope Illuminating a Dark Road

Although new-generation antimicrobials, in particular β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, have largely replaced polymyxins in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, polymyxins are still needed for carbapanem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections and in settings where novel agents are not readily available. Despite their potent in vitro activity, the clinical utility of polymyxins is significantly limited by their pharmacokinetic properties and nephrotoxicity risk. There is significant interest, therefore, in developing next-generation polymyxins with activity against colistin-resistant strains and lower toxicity than existing polymyxins. In this review, we aim to present the antibacterial activity mechanisms, in vitro and in vivo efficacy data, and toxicity profiles of new-generation polymyxins, including SPR206, MRX-8, and QPX9003, as well as the general characteristics of old polymyxins. Considering the emergence of colistin-resistant strains particularly in endemic regions, the restoration of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxins via PBT2 is also described in this review.

Prevalence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors in critically ill adult patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity is a major safety concern in clinical practice due to long-term adverse outcomes and high mortality.

AIM

To conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and potential predictors of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Reference Citation Analysis database were searched for relevant studies from inception through May 30, 2022. The pooled prevalence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and pooled risk ratios of associated factors were analysed using a random-effects or fixed-effects model by Stata SE ver. 12.1. Additionally, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 89 studies involving 12234 critically ill adult patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity was 34.8%. The pooled prevalence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was not higher than that of polymyxin B (PMB)-induced nephrotoxicity. The subgroup analyses showed that nephrotoxicity was significantly associated with dosing interval, nephrotoxicity criteria, age, publication year, study quality and sample size, which were confirmed in the univariable meta-regression analysis. Nephrotoxicity was significantly increased when the total daily dose was divided into 2 doses but not 3 or 4 doses. Furthermore, older age, the presence of sepsis or septic shock, hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant vancomycin or vasopressor use were independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity, while an elevated baseline glomerular filtration rate was a protective factor against colistin-induced nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that the incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity among ICU patients was high. It emphasizes the importance of additional efforts to manage ICU patients receiving polymyxins to decrease the risk of adverse outcomes.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of MDR/XDR Bacterial Infections in a Neuromuscular Semi-Intensive/Sub-Intensive Care Unit

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and microbiological characteristics of multidrug-resistant infections in a neuromuscular semi-intensive/sub-intensive care unit; (2) Methods: Retrospective analysis on data from 18 patients with NMD with proven MDRO/XDRO colonisation/infection from August 2021 to March 2022 was carried out; (3) Results: Ten patients were males (55.6%), with a median age of 54 years, and there were fourteen patients (77.8%) with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. All patients had at least one invasive device. Ten (55.6%) patients developed MDRO/XDRO infection (with a median time of 24 days) while six (33.3%) were colonised. The Charlson comorbidity index was >2 in both groups but higher in the infected compared with the colonised (4.5 vs. 3). Infected patients were mostly females (seven patients) with a median age of 62 years. The most common pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, infecting four (28.6%) patients each. Of eighteen infectious episodes, nine were pneumonia (hospital-acquired in seven cases). Colistin was the most commonly active antibiotic while carbapenems were largely inactive. Eradication of infection occurred in seven infectious episodes (38.9%). None of those with infection died; (4) Conclusions: MDRO/XDRO infections are common in patients with neuromuscular diseases, with carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli prevailing. These infections were numerically associated with the female sex, greater age, and comorbidities. Both eradication and infection-related mortality appeared low. We highlight the importance of infection prevention in this vulnerable population.

Antibiotic resistance pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae a major problem for society

Aim: Antibiotic resistance pattern of klebsiella pneumoniae a major problem for society. Methods: After ethical approval from the institutional ethical committee this study was done in the department of microbiology from April 2021 to march 2022 in genesis institute of dental science and research centre with collaboration of anil baghi hospital, firozpur, Punjab India. Demographic profile of all the patients like age, gender, history of any diseases was noted. All the sample like urine, sputum, blood, pleural fluid and urethral discharge were collected in the department for isolation and identification of K. pneumoniae.  After 24hrs those were positive sample, further proceed for grams staining. B D Phoenix advanced automated microbiology system was used for identification and sensitivity of bacteria for 24hrs. Results: The study showed that highest number of patients having Klebsiella pneumonia were from 50-70 years having 20 (40%)patients followed by 30-50 years with 16 (32%), from Above 70 years 12 (24%) and below the age of 30 years having lowest number with two (4%) patients out of all patients. The number of male patients 33(66%) is more than females 17(34%).

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Characteristics, Influencing Factors, Predictive Scoring System, and Outcomes of the Patients with Nephrotoxicity Associated with Administration of Intravenous Colistin

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infection is a major global public health threat. Currently, colistin is considered the last-resort treatment despite its nephrotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence, characteristics, and influencing factors and to develop a prediction model for colistin-associated nephrotoxicity. A retrospective study was conducted in the university hospital in the South of Thailand from December 2015 to June 2019. A total of 381 patients (median age (IQR) of 64 (51–62) years) were analyzed. Overall, 282 (74%) had nephrotoxicity according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification. In-hospital, 30-day mortality rates and cost of hospital admission were significantly higher among those with nephrotoxicity. Age > 60 years, comorbidities, serum albumin less than 3.5 g/dL, and concomitant nephrotoxic use were significantly associated with colistin-associated nephrotoxicity with adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.01 (1.23–2.45), 1.85 (1.18–3.6), 1.68 (1.09–2.99), and 1.77 (1.10–2.97), respectively. The prediction model for high-risk colistin-associated nephrotoxicity was identified with good overall performance (specificity of 79.6% (95% CI 70.3–87.1) and positive predictive value of 92.1% (95% CI 88.0–95.1)). In conclusion, the incidence of colistin-associated nephrotoxicity was high and incurred significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Our predictive scoring system is relatively simple and useful for optimizing colistin therapy.

Utilization of Colistin Versus β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor Agents in Relation to Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Severe Gram-Negative Infections

Introduction

Colistin is used to treat severe antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections (GNIs). With the rise of antibiotic resistance, colistin has been used increasingly as a ‘last-line’ therapy for multidrug-resistant GNIs. We evaluated the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality among patients receiving colistin or one of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (βL + βLI) (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, or meropenem/vaborbactam).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Premier Healthcare Database. The cohort included propensity score-matched adults with an inpatient stay between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients given both colistin and BL + BLI as treatment for ≥ 72 h were excluded. AKI was defined as acute renal failure or dialysis during hospitalization with antibiotic administration. Propensity score matching was used to control for selection bias and confounding. Logistic regression evaluated associations between treatment, AKI, and in-hospital mortality.

Results

The total number of patients in the matched cohorts were 256 in each. Overall, 23.8% and 13.3% of patients receiving colistin or new βL + βLI agents, respectively, experienced AKI during hospitalization (p = 0.002); odds of AKI for colistin were 3.0 (95% CI 1.71, 5.21). Following propensity score-matching, patients without baseline renal disease experienced AKI during hospitalization to a higher degree in the colistin group compared to the βL + βLI group (17.1% vs. 6.8%); colistin use was associated with 3.7 times higher odds (95% CI 1.84, 7.42) of AKI compared to βL + βLI agents. The odds of mortality in patients on colistin developing AKI were more than three times that of patients receiving a BL + BLI agent who developed AKI. Among patients receiving colistin, incident AKI was associated with 6.1 times higher odds (95% CI 2.53, 14.71) of mortality.

Conclusions

Patients receiving colistin for GNIs had significantly higher odds of AKI and mortality than those receiving βL + βLI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00556-x.

Comparison of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity between two different formulations of colistin in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Colistin is widely used in the treatment of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB). Colistin-induced nephrotoxicity is one of the major adverse reactions during colistin treatment. Comparisons of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity between different formulations of colistin are rarely reported.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled intensive care unit–admitted patients if they had culture isolates of CR-GNB and underwent intravenous treatment with colistin. The occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) during intravenous treatment with colistin was recorded. The occurrence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was compared between two formulations of colistin, Locolin®, and Colimycin®. Treatment outcomes associated with the occurrence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity were also investigated.

Results

Among 195 patients, 95 who were treated with Locolin® and 100 who were treated with Colimycin® were included for analysis. Patients treated with Locolin® had a higher rate of occurrence of stage 2 (46.3% vs. 32%, p = 0.040) and stage 3 (29.5% vs. 13%, p = 0.005) AKI than did those treated with Colimycin®. In multivariate analysis, the presence of septic shock (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–4.26) and inappropriate colistin dosage (aOR 2.52, 95% CI 1.00–6.33) were clinical factors associated with colistin-induced nephrotoxicity. Treatment with Colimycin® was an independent factor associated with a lower risk of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18–0.77). The mortality rate was comparable between patients with and without colistin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Conclusions

The risk of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity significantly varied in different formulations of colistin in critically ill patients. Colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was not associated with increased mortality rate.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00977-w.

Evaluation of prognosis and nephrotoxicity in patients treated with colistin in intensive care unit

Introduction

Nephrotoxicity is the most important adverse effect of colistin therapy. We investigated the frequency of nephrotoxicity, risk factors related to nephrotoxicity, and its relationship with mortality in patients who received intravenous colistin in intensive care units (ICUs).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who received intravenous colistin in ICUs between 2011 and 2017. Acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis and staging were made based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria.

Results

There were 149 patients included in the study with 61% being male. The mean age was 58.7 ± 20.3 years. AKI was detected in 96 (64.4%) patients. There were 25 patients with AKI stage 1 (16.8%) and 71 patients with AKI stage 2 or 3 (47.7%). Advanced age (65.0 vs. 47.4 years; p < .001), diabetes mellitus (p < .001), heart failure (p = .01), high APACHE II score (31.7 vs. 28.08, p = .019), and inotrope usage (p = .01) were found as risk factors for AKI. The 14-day mortality rate was higher in the AKI group (p = .027).

Discussion

Higher AKI and mortality rates are observed in patients with diabetes, heart failure, advanced age and the hemodynamically impaired. However, it is a fact that there are no alternative therapies other than colistin in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Therefore, the development of AKI in this patient group should not be considered a sufficient reason for discontinuing colistin treatment. Understanding the risk factors in this potential nephrotoxic treatment can provide a more careful patient follow-up.

Systematic review on estimated rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in patients treated with polymyxins

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are commonly associated with polymyxin treatment; however, the emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options has resulted in increased use of polymyxins.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity during polymyxin treatment and whether any factors influence these.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 2 January 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting nephrotoxicity and/or neurotoxicity rates in patients with infections treated with polymyxins were included. Reviews, meta-analyses and reports not in English were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients hospitalized with infections treated with systemic or inhaled polymyxins were included. For comparative analyses, patients treated with non-polymyxin-based regimens were also included.

METHODS

Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model; subgroup meta-analyses were conducted where data permitted using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 237 reports of randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclusion; most were single-arm observational studies. Nephrotoxic events in 35,569 patients receiving polymyxins were analysed. Overall nephrotoxicity rate was 0.282 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.259-0.307). When excluding studies where >50% of patients received inhaled-only polymyxin treatment or nephrotoxicity assessment was by methods other than internationally recognized criteria (RIFLE, KDIGO or AKIN), the nephrotoxicity rate was 0.391 (95% CI 0.364-0.419). The odds of nephrotoxicity were greater with polymyxin therapies compared to non-polymyxin-based regimens (odds ratio 2.23 (95% CI 1.58-3.15); p < 0.001). Meta-analyses showed a significant effect of polymyxin type, dose, patient age, number of concomitant nephrotoxins and use of diuretics, glycopeptides or vasopressors on the rate of nephrotoxicity. Polymyxin therapies were not associated with a significantly different rate of neurotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens (p 0.051). The overall rate of neurotoxicity during polymyxin therapy was 0.030 (95% CI 0.020-0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymyxins are associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens.

Acute kidney injury following colistin treatment in critically-ill patients: may glucocorticoids protect?

Nephrotoxicity following colistin administration is common and factors alleviating nephrotoxicity are yet to be determined. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of subjects who were treated with colistin (n = 133) and with antibiotics other than colistin (control, n = 133) in intensive care units. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 69.2% and 29.3% of patients in colistin and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the colistin group, glucocorticoid exposure was more common in subjects who did not develop AKI (p < 0.001). This was not the case in the control group. In the colistin cohort, older age (per 10 years, odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.91; p = 0.025), PPI use (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.18-9.23; p = 0.023) and furosemide treatment (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.01-6.98; p = 0.047) were independently associated with the development of AKI while glucocorticoid treatment (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.53; p = 0.001) was independently associated with reduced risk of AKI. Mortality was observed in 74 patients in the colistin cohort (55.6%). A higher APACHE-II score (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26; p < 0.001) was independently associated with mortality while a higher serum albumin level (per 1 g/dL increase, OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.070-0.60; p = 0.004) was associated with a lower risk of mortality. In conclusion, glucocorticoid exposure is associated with a lower risk of AKI caused by colistin therapy in critically-ill patients. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal type, dose and duration of glucocorticoid therapy.

Early Intravenous Colistin Therapy as a Favorable Prognostic Factor for 28-day Mortality in Patients with CRAB Bacteremia: a Multicenter Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infection is associated with high mortality. One of the strategies to reduce the mortality in patients with CRAB infections is to use intravenous colistin early but the effect of this strategy has not been proven. Therefore, we investigated the association of early colistin therapy with 28-day mortality in patients with CRAB bacteremia.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter propensity score-matching analysis was conducted in the Korea by reviewing the medical records of adult patients with CRAB bacteremia between January 2012 and March 2015. Early colistin therapy was defined as intravenous colistin administration for > 48 hours within five days after the blood culture collection. To identify the risk factors associated with the 28-day mortality in CRAB bacteremia, the clinical variables of the surviving patients were compared to those of the deceased patients.

RESULTS

Of 303 enrolled patients, seventy-six (25.1%) patients received early colistin therapy. The 28-day mortality was 61.4% (186/303). Fatal or rapidly-fatal McCabe classifications, intensive care unit admission, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores ≥ 8, vasopressor use, and acute kidney injury were statistically independent poor prognostic factors. Catheter-related infection and early colistin therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.94) were independent favorable prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in patients with CRAB bacteremia. Early colistin therapy was still significantly associated with lower 28-day mortality in the propensity score-matching analysis (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.88).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that early colistin therapy might help reduce the mortality of patients with CRAB bacteremia.

Treatment Options for Colistin Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Present and Future

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae represents an increasing threat to human health, causing difficult-to-treat infections with a high mortality rate. Since colistin is one of the few treatment options for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections, colistin resistance represents a challenge due to the limited range of potentially available effective antimicrobials, including tigecycline, gentamicin, fosfomycin and ceftazidime/avibactam. Moreover, the choice of these antimicrobials depends on their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics properties, the site of infection and the susceptibility profile of the isolated strain, and is sometimes hampered by side effects. This review describes the features of colistin resistance in K. pneumoniae and the characteristics of the currently available antimicrobials for colistin-resistant MDR K. pneumoniae, as well as the characteristics of novel antimicrobial options, such as the soon-to-be commercially available plazomicin and cefiderocol. Finally, we consider the future use of innovative therapeutic strategies in development, including bacteriophages therapy and monoclonal antibodies.

Management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem resistance is defined as in vitro non-susceptibility to any carbapenem and/or documented production of a carbapenemase. This feature has rapidly spread worldwide among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, mostly Klebsiella spp., and is associated with diverse molecular mechanisms. Carbapenem resistance is often associated with resistance to all traditional β-lactams and other classes of antibiotics, denoting a typical example of an extensively drug-resistant phenotype.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and interpret in a balanced manner the most clinically relevant data in terms of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection management.

SOURCES

Data were extracted by PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov search and manual scrutiny among references of analysed articles.

CONTENT

Features of newer and older, rediscovered antimicrobial options for CRE are described. Observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT) of CRE treatment are summarized, with a specific focus on the effects of monotherapy compared with combination treatment.

IMPLICATIONS

The available evidence on the current management of CRE mostly comes from observational, non-comparative, retrospective, small studies, with a high risk of selection bias. Very little evidence comes from RCT. Conflicting results of RCT and observational studies call for caution before combination therapies are deemed superior to monotherapy. Data on newer agents have spurred enthusiasm but remain limited as concerns severe CRE infections. A balanced approach should guide the clinician in the choice of old or new drugs, and of monotherapies or combination regimens. Efforts should be made to perform adequately sized clinical trials answering well-defined research questions.

Hypoalbuminemia as a predictor of acute kidney injury during colistin treatment

This study aimed to assess the predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) during colistin therapy in a cohort of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) due to colistin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the role of serum albumin levels. The study consisted of two parts: (1) a multicentre retrospective clinical study to assess the predictors of AKI during colistin therapy, defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria; and (2) bioinformatic and biochemical characterization of the possible interaction between human serum albumin and colistin. Among the 170 patients included in the study, 71 (42%), 35 (21%), and 11 (6%) developed KDIGO stage 1 (K1-AKI), KDIGO stage 2 (K2-AKI), and KDIGO stage 3 (K3-AKI), respectively. In multivariable analyses, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL was independently associated with K1-AKI (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.93, p = 0.009) and K2-AKI (sHR 2.37, 95% CI 1.15-4.87, p = 0.019). Bioinformatic and biochemical analyses provided additional information nurturing the discussion on how hypoalbuminemia favors development of AKI during colistin therapy. In conclusion, severe hypoalbuminemia independently predicted AKI during colistin therapy in a large cohort of patients with BSI due to colistin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. Further study is needed to clarify the underlying causal pathways.

Drug-induced kidney disease in the ICU: mechanisms, susceptibility, diagnosis and management strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in the critically ill population, is multifactorial and associated with increased mortality. Drug-induced kidney injury is a significant contributor to the development of AKI. The purpose of this review is to provide updates in the epidemiology, susceptibility and management of drug-induced kidney disease (DIKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent changes in guidelines for the management of serious infections in the critically ill have resulted in an increased frequency of DIKD. Varying definitions employed in clinical trials has complicated the awareness of this adverse event. Causality assessment is often missing from studies as it is complicated by the need to evaluate competing AKI risk factors. This has led to uncertainty in the nephrotoxic risk of commonly used drugs.

SUMMARY

Standard criteria for DIKD should be applied in clinical trials to improve our understanding of the frequency of these events. Adjudication of these events will improve the clinician's ability to evaluate the causal relationship and relative contribution of specific drugs to the AKI event.

Synergistic Activity of Colistin/Fosfomycin Combination against Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae is globally recognized as one of the greatest threats to public health, and combination therapy may be the chemotherapeutic option. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of colistin/fosfomycin combination against carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. The antibacterial effects were determined in a one-compartment in vitro pharmacokinetic model over a period of 24 h. The initial inoculum was 10⁸ CFU/mL. Low, medium, and high C_max values of colistin at 0.5, 2, and 5 mg/L as well as C_max of fosfomycin at 100 mg/L were simulated in the model. Doses of both colistin and fosfomycin were given every 8 h until 24 h. For the colistin- and fosfomycin-susceptible isolate KP47, three combination regimens showed greater killing effect compared with colistin monotherapy. The greatest killing effect was observed in combination regimen containing 5 mg/L colistin. For colistin-heteroresistant and fosfomycin-susceptible isolate KP79, combination regimen containing low dose colistin (0.5 mg/L) showed no synergistic or additive effects. However, combination regimens containing 2 and 5 mg/L colistin maintained the bactericidal effect until 24 h compared with colistin monotherapy. For colistin-heteroresistant and fosfomycin-resistant isolates KP42 and KP11, bactericidal activity was barely enhanced by combination regimens. Moreover, combination regimen containing 5 mg/L colistin could only prevent the emergence of colistin-resistant subpopulation in colistin and fosfomycin-susceptible isolate. It is necessary to know the resistant patterns of the K. pneumoniae before using combination of colistin and fosfomycin in clinical practice.

Colistin versus Colistin Combined with Ampicillin-Sulbactam for Multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Treatment: An Open-label Prospective Study

Background:

Retrospective studies have reported good clinical success rates using colistin as monotherapy to treat Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), comparable to that obtained with colistin combined with other antibiotics. However, inadequate penetration into the pulmonary parenchyma for colistin has been shown in animal models.

Aim:

The aim of the study was to study prospectively the outcome, measured as clinical response and survival, of intravenously administered colistin versus colistin combined with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with multiresistant A. baumannii VAP.

Methods and Subjects:

This prospective, open-label, randomized study included consecutive patients who developed microbiologically documented VAP due to A. baumannii with carbapenem-resistant strains but susceptible to colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam. Seventy-four patients were screened, but finally, 39 participants were enrolled and finished the study Patients received colistin (Group A – 19 patients) or colistin and ampicillin/sulbactam (Group B – 20 patients). The clinical response of VAP was assessed on day 4^th to 5^th of treatment (early response). If therapy was considered unsuccessful after this period, ampicillin/sulbactam was added in Group A or changed therapy in B.

Results:

Early cure rates in Group A and B were 15.8% and 70%, respectively (P = 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that combination treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 43.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.594–530.9) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score <8 (OR: 0.022, 95% CI: 0.001–0.43) were independently associated with favorable clinical response. APACHE II score ≤15 (OR: 0.049, 95% CI: 0.003–0.0942) and an early favorable response to treatment (OR: 244.4, 95% CI: 2.151–27850.9) were associated with survival and discharge from ICU.

Conclusion:

Combination therapy with colistin and a high dose of ampicillin/sulbactam was associated with a more favorable clinical response to VAP due to carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii than colistin monotherapy.

Resistance to Colistin in Klebsiella Pneumoniae: A 4.0 Strain?

The global rise of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria represents an increasing threat to patient safety. From the first observation of a carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria a global spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases producing Klebsiella pneumoniae has been observed. Treatment options for multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae are actually limited to combination therapy with some aminoglycosides, tigecycline and to older antimicrobial agents. Unfortunately, the prevalence of colistin-resistant and tigecycline-resistant K. pneumoniae is increasing globally. Infection due to colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae represents an independent risk factor for mortality. Resistance to colistin in K. pneumoniae may be multifactorial, as it is mediated by chromosomal genes or plasmids. The emergence of transmissible, plasmid-mediated colistin resistance is an alarming finding. The absence of new agents effective against resistant Gram-negative pathogens means that enhanced surveillance, compliance with infection prevention procedures, and antimicrobial stewardship programs will be required to limit the spread of colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae.