Multicentre determination of rezafungin (CD101) susceptibility of Candida species by the EUCAST method

How can we optimize antifungal use and stewardship in the treatment of acute leukemia?

INTRODUCTION

The global need for antifungal stewardship is driven by spreading antimicrobial and antifungal resistance. Triazoles are the only oral and relatively well-tolerated class of antifungal medications, and usage is associated with acquired resistance and species replacement with intrinsically resistant organisms. On a per-patient basis, hematology patients are the largest inpatient consumers of antifungal drugs, but are also the most vulnerable to invasive fungal disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we discuss available and forthcoming antifungal drugs, antifungal prophylaxis and empiric antifungal therapy, and how a screening based and diagnostic-driven approach may be used to reduce antifungal consumption. Finally, we discuss components of an antifungal stewardship program, interventions that can be employed, and how impact can be measured. The search methodology consisted of searching PubMed for journal articles using the term antifungal stewardship plus program, intervention, performance measure or outcome before 1 January 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Initial focus should be on implementing effective antifungal stewardship programs by developing and implementing local guidelines and using interventions, such as post-prescription review and feedback, which are known to be effective. Technologies such as microbiome analysis and machine learning may allow the development of truly individualized risk-factor-based approaches to antifungal stewardship in the future.

Twenty Years in EUCAST Anti-Fungal Susceptibility Testing: Progress & Remaining Challenges

Since its inception in 2002, the EUCAST Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee (AFST) has developed and refined susceptibility testing methods for yeast, moulds and dermatophytes, and established epidemiological cut-off values and breakpoints for antifungals. For yeast, three challenges have been addressed. Interpretation of trailing growth in fluconazole susceptibility testing, which has been proven without impact on efficacy if below the 50% endpoint. Variability in rezafungin MIC testing due to laboratory conditions, which has been solved by the addition of Tween 20 to the growth medium in E.Def 7.4. And third, interpretation of MICs for rare yeast with no breakpoints, where recommendations have been established for MIC-based clinical advice. For moulds, refinements include the validation of spectrophotometer reading for A. fumigatus to facilitate objective MIC determination, and for dermatophytes the establishment of a microdilution method with automated reading and a selective medium to minimise the risk of contaminations. Recent initiatives involve development and validation of agar-based screening assays for detection of potential azole and echinocandin resistance in A. fumigatus and Aspergillus species, respectively, and of terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species. Moreover, the development of a EUCAST guidance document for molecular resistance testing represents an advancement, particularly for identifying target gene alterations associated with resistance. In summary, EUCAST AFST continues to play a pivotal role in standardizing AFST and facilitating accurate interpretation of susceptibility data for clinical decision-making. Adoption of EUCAST breakpoints for commercial test methods, however, requires thorough validation to ensure concordance with EUCAST reference testing species-specific MIC distributions.

Novel antifungals and treatment approaches to tackle resistance and improve outcomes of invasive fungal disease

SUMMARYFungal infections are on the rise, driven by a growing population at risk and climate change. Currently available antifungals include only five classes, and their utility and efficacy in antifungal treatment are limited by one or more of innate or acquired resistance in some fungi, poor penetration into "sequestered" sites, and agent-specific side effect which require frequent patient reassessment and monitoring. Agents with novel mechanisms, favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles including good oral bioavailability, and fungicidal mechanism(s) are urgently needed. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of novel antifungal agents, with both improved known mechanisms of actions and new antifungal classes, currently in clinical development for treating invasive yeast, mold (filamentous fungi), Pneumocystis jirovecii infections, and dimorphic fungi (endemic mycoses). We further focus on inhaled antifungals and the role of immunotherapy in tackling fungal infections, and the specific PK/pharmacodynamic profiles, tissue distributions as well as drug-drug interactions of novel antifungals. Finally, we review antifungal resistance mechanisms, the role of use of antifungal pesticides in agriculture as drivers of drug resistance, and detail detection methods for antifungal resistance.

Management of invasive candidiasis: A focus on rezafungin, ibrexafungerp, and fosmanogepix

Management of invasive fungal infections is challenging with growing antifungal resistance. Broad antifungal use has resulted in greater intrinsic and acquired resistance among Candida spp. It is important for clinicians to recognize the relationship between host susceptibility, site of infection, Candida resistance profiles, specific drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the role of novel antifungal agents. This narrative review covers the role of rezafungin, ibrexafungerp, and fosmanogepix in the management of invasive candidiasis (IC). The PubMed Database, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched between January 2006 and January 2024 using the following terms: rezafungin, CD101, ibrexafungerp, SCY-078, fosmanogepix, APX001, candidemia, and invasive candidiasis. Review articles, prospective clinical trials, and observational studies published in the English language were reviewed. Studies evaluating pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in animals and humans were also reviewed. Promising data continues to emerge in support of novel drug therapies for IC and candidemia. Rezafungin possesses a unique pharmacodynamic profile that might be advantageous compared to other echinocandins, with a practical, once-weekly dosing interval. Ibrexafungerp, currently approved for vulvovaginal candidiasis, has been studied off-label for use in IC and candidemia, and initial data is encouraging. Lastly, fosmanogepix, a mechanistically novel, investigational antifungal agent, may be a potential future option in the management of IC and candidemia. Future research is needed to evaluate the potential use of these agents among diverse patient populations.

In Vitro Activitiy of Rezafungin in Comparison with Anidulafungin and Caspofungin against Invasive Fungal Isolates (2017 to 2022) in China

The efficacy of different echinocandins is assessed by evaluating the in vitro activity of a novel antifungal, rezafungin, against invasive fungal isolates in comparison with anidulafungin and caspofungin. Using the broth microdilution (BMD) method, the susceptibility of 1000 clinical Candida isolates (including 400 C. albicans, 200 C. glabrata, 200 C. parapsilosis, 150 C. tropicalis and 50 C. krusei) and 150 Aspergillus isolates (100 A. fumigatus and 50 A. flavus) from the Eastern China Invasive Fungi Infection Group (ECIFIG) was tested for the antifungals including anidulafungin, rezafungin, caspofungin and fluconazole. The echinocandins showed strong activity against C. albicans that was maintained against fluconazole-resistant isolates. The GM MIC (geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentration) value of rezafungin was found to be comparable to that of anidulafungin or caspofungin against the five tested common Candida species. C. tropicalis exhibited higher resistance rates (about 8.67-40.67% in different antifungals) than the other four Candida species. Through the sequencing of FKS genes, we searched for mutations in echinocandin-resistant C. tropicalis isolates and found that all displayed alterations in FKS1 S654P. The determined MEC (minimal effective concentration) values against A. fumigatus and A. flavus for rezafungin (0.116 μg/mL, 0.110 μg/mL) are comparable to those of caspofungin (0.122 μg/mL, 0.142 μg/mL) but higher than for anidulafungin (0.064 μg/mL, 0.059 μg/mL). Thus, the in vitro activity of rezafungin appears comparable to anidulafungin and caspofungin against most common Candida and Aspergillus species. Rezafungin showed higher susceptibility rates against C. glabrata. Rezafungin indicates its potent activity for potential clinical application.

A Mini-Review of In Vitro Data for Candida Species, Including C. auris, Isolated during Clinical Trials of Three New Antifungals: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, and Rezafungin

This mini-review summarizes the clinical outcomes and antifungal susceptibility results, where available, for three new antifungals, including fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, and rezafungin, against Candida isolates cultured from patients in clinical trials. When reported, most of the data were generated by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method or by both the CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methodologies. For fosmanogepix, we summarize the in vitro data for C. auris isolates from 9 patients and for Candida spp. cultured from 20 patients in two clinical trials. Ibrexafungerp has also been evaluated in several clinical trials. From conference proceedings, a total of 176 Candida isolates were evaluated in the FURI and CARES studies, including 18 C. auris isolates (CARES study). However, MIC data are not available for all clinical isolates. Results from the ReSTORE rezafungin phase 3 clinical study also included in vitro results against Candida spp., but no patients with C. auris infections were included. In conclusion, this mini-review summarizes insights regarding clinical outcomes and the in vitro activity of three new antifungals against Candida spp. cultured from patients in clinical trials.

Salvage Therapy with Rezafungin for Candida parapsilosis Spondylodiscitis: A Case Report from Expanded Access Program

Candida spp. spondylodiscitis is a rare condition for which treatment options are often limited. A further obstacle is the duration of therapy, which should be administered for up to twelve months. In view of the long duration of therapy, azoles are, so far, the only oral treatment strategy that can be given as home therapy. In the case of resistance or reduced susceptibility to azoles, there are not enough comfortable treatment opportunities with adequate bone penetration and limited toxicity. We report the first case of the successful use of rezafungin for spondylodiscitis due to Candida parapsilosis with reduced susceptibility to azoles. A 68-year-old patient, affected by paraplegia and short bowel syndrome, was diagnosed with Candida parapsilosis spondylodiscitis, confirmed with a culture on vertebral biopsy after an 18-FDG PET/CT scan. He received 200 mg of rezafungin weekly for 26 weeks, after 10 weeks of previous antifungal treatment that was not well tolerated with voriconazole plus liposomal amphotericin B. He had a full clinical, radiologic, and biochemical response to the therapy with rezafungin, with no adverse effects. Rezafungin can be a promising therapy for Candida osteomyelitis, especially when first line therapies are ineffective, poorly tolerated, or contraindicated.

Emerging Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Invasive Fungal Infections

Recently, there have been significant advances in the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal infections. Compared with traditional fungal diagnostics, molecular assays promise improved sensitivity and specificity, the ability to test a range of samples (including noninvasive samples, ie, blood), the detection of genetic mutations associated with antifungal resistance, and the potential for a faster turnaround time. Antifungals in late-stage clinical development include agents with novel mechanisms of action (olorofim and fosmanogepix) and new members of existing classes with distinct advantages over existing antifungals in toxicity, drug-drug interactions, and dosing convenience (oteseconazole, opelconazole, rezafungin, ibrexafungerp, encochleated amphotericin B).

Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto Antifungal Resistance Mechanisms and Associated Epidemiology

Fungal diseases cause millions of deaths per year worldwide. Antifungal resistance has become a matter of great concern in public health. In recent years rates of non-albicans species have risen dramatically. Candida parapsilosis is now reported to be the second most frequent species causing candidemia in several countries in Europe, Latin America, South Africa and Asia. Rates of acquired azole resistance are reaching a worrisome threshold from multiple reports as in vitro susceptibility testing is now starting also to explore tolerance and heteroresistance to antifungal compounds. With this review, the authors seek to evaluate known antifungal resistance mechanisms and their worldwide distribution in Candida species infections with a specific focus on C. parapsilosis.

Invasive Candida infection: epidemiology, clinical and therapeutic aspects of an evolving disease and the role of rezafungin

INTRODUCTION

Invasive Candida Infections (ICIs) have undergone a series of significant epidemiological, pathophysiological, and clinical changes during the last decades, with a shift toward non-albicans species, an increase in the rate of exogenous infections and clinical manifestations ranging from candidemia to an array of highly invasive and life-threatening clinical syndromes. The long-acting echinocandin rezafungin exhibits potent in-vitro activity against most wild-type and azole-resistant Candida spp. including C.auris.

AREAS COVERED

The following topics regarding candidemia only and ICIs were reviewed and addressed: i) pathogenesis; ii) epidemiology and temporal evolution of Candida species; iii) clinical approach; iv) potential role of the novel long-acting rezafungin in the treatment of ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

Authors' expert opinion focused on considering the potential role of rezafungin in the evolving context of ICIs. Rezafungin, which combines a potent in-vitro activity against Candida species, including azole-resistant strains and C.auris, with a low likelihood of drug-drug interactions and a good safety profile, may revolutionize the treatment of candidemia/ICI. Indeed, it may shorten the length of hospital stays when clinical conditions allow and extend outpatient access to treatment of invasive candidiasis, especially when prolonged treatment duration is expected.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Invasive Candidiasis: Considerations for the Clinician

Invasive candidiasis (IC), due to the yeast pathogen Candida, is still a major cause of in-hospital morbidity and mortality. The limited number of antifungal drug classes and the emergence of multi-resistant Candida species, such as Candida auris and some Candida glabrata isolates, is concerning. However, recent advances in antifungal drug development provide promising perspectives for the therapeutic approach of IC. Notably, three novel antifungal agents, currently in Phase II/III clinical trials, are expected to have an important place for the treatment of IC in the future. Rezafungin is a novel echinocandin with prolonged half-life. Ibrexafungerp and fosmanogepix are two first-in-class antifungal drugs with broad spectrum activity against Candida spp., including C. auris and echinocandin-resistant species. These novel antifungal agents also represent interesting alternative options because of their acceptable oral bioavailability (ibrexafungerp and fosmanogepix) or their large interdose interval (once weekly intravenous administration for rezafungin) for prolonged and/or outpatient treatment of complicated IC. This review discusses the potential place of these novel antifungal drugs for the treatment of IC considering their pharmacologic properties and their preclinical and clinical data.

Multicentre validation of a modified EUCAST MIC testing method and development of associated epidemiologic cut-off (ECOFF) values for rezafungin

OBJECTIVES

Rezafungin EUCAST MIC testing has been associated with notable inter-laboratory variation, which prevented ECOFF setting for C. albicans. We assessed in vitro susceptibility and reproducibility for a modified EUCAST methodology and established associated wild-type upper limits (WT-ULs).

METHODS

MICs against 150 clinical Candida isolates (six species), molecularly characterized fks mutants (n = 13), and QC strains (n = 6) were determined at six laboratories according to E.Def 7.3 but using Tween 20 supplemented medium. WT-ULs were determined using the derivatization method, the ECOFFinder programme and visual inspection. Consensus WT-ULs were determined.

RESULTS

The laboratory- and species-specific MIC distributions were Gaussian with >99.5% MICs within four 2-fold dilutions except for C. parapsilosis (92.8%). The following consensus WT-UL were determined: C. albicans 0.008 mg/L; C. dubliniensis and C. glabrata 0.016 mg/L; C. krusei and C. tropicalis 0.03 mg/L; and C. parapsilosis 4 mg/L. Adopting these WT-UL, six clinical isolates were non-wild-type, five of which harboured Fks alterations. For 11/13 mutants, all 670 MICs were categorized as non-wild-type whereas MICs for C. glabrata Fks2 D666Y and C. tropicalis Fks1 R656R/G overlapped with the corresponding wild-type distributions. Repeat testing of six reference strains yielded 98.3%-100% of MICs within three 2-fold dilutions except for C. albicans CNM-CL-F8555 (96%) and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (93.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified EUCAST method significantly improved inter-laboratory variation, identified wild-type populations and allowed perfect separation of wild-type and fks mutants except for two isolates harbouring weak mutations. These consensus WT-UL have been accepted as ECOFFs and will be used for rezafungin breakpoint setting.

Pharmacodynamics, Mechanisms of Action and Resistance, and Spectrum of Activity of New Antifungal Agents

Several new antifungals are currently in late-stage development, including those with novel pharmacodynamics/mechanisms of action that represent new antifungal classes (manogepix, olorofim, ATI-2307, GR-2397). Others include new agents within established classes or with mechanisms of action similar to clinically available antifungals (ibrexafungerp, rezafungin, oteseconazole, opelconazole, MAT2203) that have been modified in order to improve certain characteristics, including enhanced pharmacokinetics and greater specificity for fungal targets. Many of the antifungals under development also have activity against Candida and Aspergillus strains that have reduced susceptibility or acquired resistance to azoles and echinocandins, whereas others demonstrate activity against species that are intrinsically resistant to most clinically available antifungals. The tolerability and drug–drug interaction profiles of these new agents also appear to be promising, although the number of human subjects that have been exposed to many of these agents remains relatively small. Overall, these agents have the potential for expanding our antifungal armamentarium and improving clinical outcomes in patients with invasive mycoses.

Novel agents in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs) suffer a significant burden of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). The emergence of drug-resistant fungi and toxicities of currently used antifungal agents as well as drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressants make their treatment challenging. This review discusses selected novel antifungal agents in the development pipeline that can currently be used through clinical trials or may be commercially available in the near future.

RECENT FINDINGS

These agents in development have novel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, expanded spectra of activity and excellent safety profiles.

SUMMARY

The properties of novel antifungal agents have the potential to expand the therapeutic options for IFIs in recipients of SOTs.

Invasive candidiasis: Investigational drugs in the clinical development pipeline and mechanisms of action

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of invasive Candida infections is evolving. Infections caused by non-albicans Candida spp. are increasing; however, the antifungal pipeline is more promising than ever and is enriched with repurposed drugs and agents that have new mechanisms of action. Despite progress, unmet needs in the treatment of invasive candidiasis remain and there are still too few antifungals that can be administered orally or that have CNS penetration.

AREAS COVERED

The authors shed light on those antifungal agents active against Candida that are in late-stage clinical development. Mechanisms of action and key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties are discussed. Insights are offered on the potential future roles of the investigational agents MAT-2203, oteseconazole, ATI-2307, VL-2397, NP-339, and the repurposed drug miltefosine.

EXPERT OPINION

Ibrexafungerp and fosmanogepix have novel mechanisms of action and will provide effective options for the treatment of Candida infections (including those caused by multiresistant Candida spp). Rezafungin, an echinocandin with an extended half-life allowing for once weekly administration, will be particularly valuable for outpatient treatment and prophylaxis. Despite this, there is an urgent need to garner clinical data on investigational drugs, especially in the current rise of azole-resistant and multi-drug resistant Candida spp.

Echinocandins - structure, mechanism of action and use in antifungal therapy

With increasing number of immunocompromised patients as well as drug resistance in fungi, the risk of fatal fungal infections in humans increases as well. The action of echinocandins is based on the inhibition of β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis that builds the fungal cell wall. Caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin and rezafungin are semi-synthetic cyclic lipopeptides. Their specific chemical structure possess a potential to obtain novel derivatives with better pharmacological properties resulting in more effective treatment, especially in infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus species. In this review we summarise information about echinocandins with closer look on their chemical structure, mechanism of action, drug resistance and usage in clinical practice. We also introduce actual trends in modification of this antifungals as well as new methods of their administration, and additional use in viral and bacterial infections.

Drug Resistance and Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Invasive Candidiasis

Candida species are the leading cause of invasive fungal infections worldwide and are associated with acute mortality rates of ~50%. Mortality rates are further augmented in the context of host immunosuppression and infection with drug-resistant Candida species. In this review, we outline antifungal drugs already in clinical use for invasive candidiasis and candidaemia, their targets and mechanisms of resistance in clinically relevant Candida species, encompassing not only classical resistance, but also heteroresistance and tolerance. We describe novel antifungal agents and targets in pre-clinical and clinical development, including their spectrum of activity, antifungal target, clinical trial data and potential in treatment of drug-resistant Candida. Lastly, we discuss the use of combination therapy between conventional and repurposed agents as a potential strategy to combat the threat of emerging resistance in Candida.

The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin

The epidemiology of invasive fungal infections is changing, with new populations at risk and the emergence of resistance caused by the selective pressure from increased usage of antifungal agents in prophylaxis, empiric therapy, and agriculture. Limited antifungal therapeutic options are further challenged by drug-drug interactions, toxicity, and constraints in administration routes. Despite the need for more antifungal drug options, no new classes of antifungal drugs have become available over the last 2 decades, and only one single new agent from a known antifungal class has been approved in the last decade. Nevertheless, there is hope on the horizon, with a number of new antifungal classes in late-stage clinical development. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of drug resistance employed by fungi and extensively discuss the most promising drugs in development, including fosmanogepix (a novel Gwt1 enzyme inhibitor), ibrexafungerp (a first-in-class triterpenoid), olorofim (a novel dihyroorotate dehydrogenase enzyme inhibitor), opelconazole (a novel triazole optimized for inhalation), and rezafungin (an echinocandin designed to be dosed once weekly). We focus on the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics, as well as the spectrum of activity and stages of clinical development. We also highlight the potential future role of these drugs and unmet needs.

Antifungal Pipeline

In many ways, fungal diseases are forgotten or neglected. Given the significantly lower frequency compared to similar bacterial etiologies across the spectrum of infectious syndromes, it makes sense that anti-bacterial agents have seen the bulk of development in recent decades. The vast majority of new antifungal medications approved for use in the past 10 years have been new versions in the same class as existing agents. Clinical mycology is crying out for new mechanisms of action in the setting of rising resistance and emergence of new organisms. Fortunately, this trend appears to be reversing. There are numerous agents in advanced stages of development offering novel dosing regimens and mechanisms of action to combat these threats. Herein we review seven antifungal agents that we hope to see come to market in the coming years to aid physicians in the treatment of mucocutaneous and invasive fungal infections.

How urgent is the need for new antifungals?

Introduction: Invasive fungal infection carries a high morbidity, mortality and economic cost. In recent times, a rising incidence of fungal infection and antifungal resistance is occurring which has prompted the development of novel antifungal agents.Areas covered:In this perspective, the authors describe the current status of registered antifungals and their limitations in the treatment of invasive fungal infection. They also go on to describe the new antifungal agents that are in the clinical stage of development and how they might be best utilized in patient care in the future.Expert opinion: The antifungal drug development pipeline has responded to a growing need for new agents to effectively treat fungal disease without concomitant toxicity or issues with drug tolerance. Olorofim (F901318), ibrexafungerp (SCY-078), fosmanogepix (APX001), rezafungin (CD101), oteseconazole (VT-1161), encochleated amphotericin B (MAT2203), nikkomycin Z (NikZ) and ATI-2307 are all in the clinical stage of development and offer great promise in offering clinicians better agents to treat these difficult infections.

Establishment of epidemiological cut-off values for cefoselis, a new fourth-generation cephalosporin, against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES

To establish the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for cefoselis against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

We collected 2288 non-repetitive clinical isolates from five laboratories throughout four cities in China. The cefoselis MICs and inhibition zone diameters for all isolates were established using the broth microdilution method and the disc diffusion method following EUCAST guidelines. MIC ECOFFs were determined by visual estimation and ECOFFinder software. Zone diameter ECOFFs were set if a high correlation of MICs and inhibition zone diameters was found by Pearson correlation. Zone diameter ECOFFs were finally determined by the visual estimate method.

RESULTS

MICs of cefoselis were distributed from 0.008 to >256 mg/L for the four Enterobacterales species and from 0.25 to >256 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. MIC ECOFFs were 0.125 mg/L for E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis, 0.25 mg/L for E. cloacae and 32 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. A high correlation of MICs and zone diameters was observed for all Enterobacterales (|r| > 0.8, P < 0.001) and a relatively high correlation was found for P. aeruginosa (|r| = 0.71, P < 0.001). The zone diameter ECOFF was 24 mm for E. cloacae, E. coli and K. pneumoniae, 26 mm for P. mirabilis and 21 mm for P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for cefoselis against four Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa. The establishment of ECOFFs for cefoselis provides clinicians with helpful guidance to differentiate WT and non-WT pathogens.

In vitro activity of rezafungin against common and rare Candida species and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND

Rezafungin is a novel echinocandin with excellent activity against common Candida species; however, limited data are available regarding rare Candida species.

METHODS

We determined the in vitro susceptibility of 689 clinical isolates of 5 common and 19 rare Candida species, as well as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The activity of rezafungin was compared with that of anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B and fluconazole, using CLSI broth microdilution methodology (Fourth Edition: M27).

RESULTS

Rezafungin MIC90 values were 0.06 mg/L for Candida albicans (n=125), Candida tropicalis (n=51), Candida dubliniensis (n=22), Candida inconspicua (n=41), Candida sojae (n=10), Candida lipolytica (n=10) and Candida pulcherrima (n=10), 0.12 mg/L for Candida glabrata (n=81), Candida krusei (n=53), Candida kefyr (n=52) and Candida fabianii (n=15), 0.25 mg/L for Candida lusitaniae (n=46) and Candida auris (n=19), 0.5 mg/L for Candida metapsilosis (n=15) and S. cerevisiae (n=21), 1 mg/L for Candida orthopsilosis (n=15) and Candida guilliermondii (n=27) and 2 mg/L for Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto (n=59). Caspofungin MIC90 values were 0.25-2 mg/L for all species, while micafungin and anidulafungin MIC90 values were similar to those of rezafungin. Fluconazole resistance was found in C. albicans (5.6%) and C. glabrata (4.9%); rezafungin was effective against these isolates as well. Amphotericin B MIC values did not exceed 2 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezafungin showed excellent in vitro activity against both WT and azole-resistant Candida species, as well as against S. cerevisiae. Rezafungin had similar activity to other echinocandins (excluding caspofungin) against common Candida species and, notably, against clinically relevant uncommon Candida species.

Review on Current Status of Echinocandins Use

Fungal infections are rising all over the world every year. There are only five medical compound classes for treatment: triazoles, echinocandins, polyenes, flucytosine and allylamine. Currently, echinocandins are the most important compounds, because of their wide activity spectrum and much lower sides effects that may occur during therapy with other drugs. Echinocandins are secondary metabolites of fungi, which can inhibit the biosynthesis of β-(1,3)-D-glucan. These compounds have fungicidal and fungistatic activity depending on different genera of fungi, against which they are used. Echinocandin resistance is rare—the major cause of resistance is mutations in the gene encoding the β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase enzyme. In this review of the literature we have summarized the characteristics of echinocandins, the mechanism of their antifungal activity with pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the resistance issue.

Activity of a Long-Acting Echinocandin, Rezafungin, and Comparator Antifungal Agents Tested against Contemporary Invasive Fungal Isolates (SENTRY Program, 2016 to 2018)

We evaluated the activity of rezafungin and comparators, using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methods, against a worldwide collection of 2,205 invasive fungal isolates recovered from 2016 to 2018. Candida (n = 1,904 isolates; 6 species), Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 73), Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 183), and Aspergillus flavus (n = 45) isolates were tested for their susceptibility (S) to rezafungin as well as the comparators caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, and azoles. Interpretive criteria were applied following CLSI published clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs). Isolates displaying non-wild-type (non-WT) echinocandin MIC values were sequenced for hot spot (HS) mutations. Rezafungin inhibited 99.8% of Candida albicans isolates (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/ml), 95.7% of Candida glabrata isolates (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml), 97.4% of Candida tropicalis isolates (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/ml), 100.0% of Candida krusei isolates (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/ml), and 100.0% of Candida dubliniensis isolates (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml) at ≤0.12 μg/ml. All (329/329 [100.0%]) Candida parapsilosis isolates (MIC50/90,1/2 μg/ml) were inhibited by rezafungin at ≤4 μg/ml. Fluconazole resistance was detected among 8.6% of C. glabrata isolates, 12.5% of C. parapsilosis isolates, 3.2% of C. dubliniensis isolates, and 2.6% of C. tropicalis isolates. The activity of rezafungin against these 6 Candida spp. was similar to the activity of the other echinocandins. Detection of the HS mutation was performed by sequencing echinocandin-resistant or non-WT Candida isolates. Good activity against C. neoformans was observed for fluconazole and the other azoles, whereas the echinocandins, including rezafungin, displayed limited activity. Rezafungin displayed activity similar to that of the other echinocandins against A. fumigatus and A. flavus These in vitro data contribute to accumulating research demonstrating the potential of rezafungin for preventing and treating invasive fungal infections.

Rezafungin In Vitro Activity against Contemporary Nordic Clinical Candida Isolates and Candida auris Determined by the EUCAST Reference Method

Rezafungin (formerly CD101) is a novel echinocandin in clinical development. EUCAST epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) have not yet been established. We determined the in vitro activity of rezafungin and comparators against 1,293 Nordic yeast isolates and 122 Indian Candida auris isolates and established single-center wild-type upper limits (WT-UL). The isolates (19 Candida spp. and 13 other yeast species) were identified using Chromagar; matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF); and, when needed, internal transcribed spacer sequencing. EUCAST E.Def 7.3.1 susceptibility testing included rezafungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, amphotericin B, and fluconazole. WT-UL were established following EUCAST principles for visual and statistical ECOFF setting. fks target genes were sequenced for rezafungin non-wild-type isolates. EUCAST clinical breakpoints for fungi version 9.0 were adopted for susceptibility classification. Rezafungin had species-specific activity similar to that of anidulafungin and micafungin. On a milligram-per-liter basis, rezafungin was overall less active than anidulafungin and micafungin but equally or more active than fluconazole and amphotericin B against the most common Candida species, except C. parapsilosis We identified 37 (3.1%) rezafungin non-wild-type isolates of C. albicans (1.9%), C. glabrata (3.0%), C. tropicalis (2.7%), C. dubliniensis (2.9%), C. krusei (1.2%), and C. auris (14.8%). Alterations in Fks hot spots were found in 26/26 Nordic and 8/18 non-wild-type C. auris isolates. Rezafungin displayed broad in vitro activity against Candida spp., including C. auris Adopting WT-UL established here, few Nordic strains, but a significant proportion of C. auris isolates, had elevated MICs with mutations in fks target genes that conferred echinocandin cross-resistance. fks1 mutations raised rezafungin MICs notably less than anidulafungin and micafungin MICs in C. auris.

New and Promising Chemotherapeutics for Emerging Infections Involving Drug-resistant Non-albicans Candida Species

Fungal infections are a veritable public health problem worldwide. The increasing number of patient populations at risk (e.g. transplanted individuals, cancer patients, and HIV-infected people), as well as the use of antifungal agents for prophylaxis in medicine, have favored the emergence of previously rare or newly identified fungal species. Indeed, novel antifungal resistance patterns have been observed, including environmental sources and the emergence of simultaneous resistance to different antifungal classes, especially in Candida spp., which are known for the multidrug-resistance (MDR) profile. In order to circumvent this alarming scenario, the international researchers' community is engaged in discovering new, potent, and promising compounds to be used in a near future to treat resistant fungal infections in hospital settings on a global scale. In this context, many compounds with antifungal action from both natural and synthetic sources are currently under clinical development, including those that target either ergosterol or β(1,3)-D-glucan, presenting clear evidence of pharmacologic/pharmacokinetic advantages over currently available drugs against these two well-known fungal target structures. Among these are the tetrazoles VT-1129, VT-1161, and VT-1598, the echinocandin CD101, and the glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078. In this review, we compiled the most recent antifungal compounds that are currently in clinical trials of development and described the potential outcomes against emerging and rare Candida species, with a focus on C. auris, C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, C. haemulonii, and C. rugosa. In addition to possibly overcoming the limitations of currently available antifungals, new investigational chemical agents that can enhance the classic antifungal activity, thereby reversing previously resistant phenotypes, were also highlighted. While novel and increasingly MDR non-albicans Candida species continue to emerge worldwide, novel strategies for rapid identification and treatment are needed to combat these life-threatening opportunistic fungal infections.

Hope on the Horizon: Novel Fungal Treatments in Development

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains challenging due to limitations in currently available antifungal therapies including toxicity, interactions, restricted routes of administration, and drug resistance. This review focuses on novel therapies in clinical development, including drugs and a device. These drugs have novel mechanisms of action to overcome resistance, and some offer new formulations providing distinct advantages over current therapies to improve safety profiles and reduce interactions. Among agents that target the cell wall, 2 glucan synthesis inhibitors are discussed (rezafungin and ibrexafungerp), as well as fosmanogepix and nikkomycin Z. Agents that target the cell membrane include 3 fourth-generation azoles, oral encochleated amphotericin B, and aureobasidin A. Among agents with intracellular targets, we will review olorofim, VL-2397, T-2307, AR-12, and MGCD290. In addition, we will describe neurapheresis, a device used as adjunctive therapy for cryptococcosis. With a field full of novel treatments for fungal infections, the future looks promising.

Cell Wall-Modifying Antifungal Drugs

Antifungal therapy is a critical component of patient management for invasive fungal diseases. Yet, therapeutic choices are limited as only a few drug classes are available to treat systemic disease, and some infecting strains are resistant to one or more drug classes. The ideal antifungal inhibits a fungal-specific essential target not present in human cells to avoid off-target toxicities. The fungal cell wall is an ideal drug target because its integrity is critical to cell survival and a majority of biosynthetic enzymes and wall components is unique to fungi. Among currently approved antifungal agents and those in clinical development, drugs targeting biosynthetic enzymes of the cell wall show safe and efficacious antifungal properties, which validates the cell wall as a target. The echinocandins, which inhibit β-1,3-glucan synthase, are recommended as first-line therapy for Candida infections. Newer cell wall-active drugs in clinical development encompass next-generation glucan synthase inhibitors including a novel echinocandin and an enfumafungin, an inhibitor of Gwt1, a key component of GPI anchor protein biosynthesis, and a classic inhibitor of chitin biosynthesis. As the cell wall is rich in potential drug discovery targets, it is primed to help deliver the next generation of antifungal drugs.

Fungal Cell Wall: Emerging Antifungals and Drug Resistance

The cell wall is an essential component in fungal homeostasis. The lack of a covering wall in human cells makes this component an attractive target for antifungal development. The host environment and antifungal stress can lead to cell wall modifications related to drug resistance. Antifungals targeting the cell wall including the new β-D-glucan synthase inhibitor ibrexafungerp and glycosyl-phosphatidyl Inositol (GPI) anchor pathway inhibitor fosmanogepix are promising weapons against antifungal resistance. The fosmanogepix shows strong in vitro activity against the multidrug-resistant species Candida auris, Fusarium solani, and Lomentospora prolificans. The alternative carbon sources in the infection site change the cell wall β-D-glucan and chitin composition, leading to echinocandin and amphotericin resistance. Candida populations that survive echinocandin exposure develop tolerance and show high chitin content in the cell wall, while fungal species such as Aspergillus flavus with a higher β-D-glucan content may show amphotericin resistance. Therefore understanding fungal cell dynamics has become important not only for host-fungal interactions, but also treatment of fungal infections. This review summarizes recent findings regarding antifungal therapy and development of resistance related to the fungal cell wall of the most relevant human pathogenic species.

EUCAST Reference Testing of Rezafungin Susceptibility and Impact of Choice of Plastic Plates

Rezafungin is a new long-acting echinocandin currently in phase 3 development. Epidemiological cutoff values are necessary for breakpoint setting but have not been established due to unexplained interlaboratory MIC variations observed in a prior multicenter study. Here we investigated if the choice of microtiter plates affected the variability when anidulafungin was included as a comparator. Testing by the EUCAST E.Def 7.3.1 reference method using tissue and cell culture-treated polystyrene plates (TC plates) and untreated polystyrene plates (UT plates) from four manufacturers was performed. Six control strains (Candida albicans, n = 3; C. krusei, n = 2; C. parapsilosis, n = 1) were tested (520 MICs). Subsequently, 5 or 6 wild-type isolates and 4 or 5 fks mutants of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis (wild type only), and C. tropicalis were tested (930 MICs). For each strain-plate combination, ≥98% of the repetitive MICs were within 3 dilutions. The rezafungin modal MICs for the collated C. albicans control strain distributions were 0.016 mg/liter across TC plates but 0.03 mg/liter across UT plates, whereas they were 0.004 mg/liter and 0.016 mg/liter, respectively, for anidulafungin. The difference was most pronounced with Falcon plates and was not observed for C. krusei and C. parapsilosis Eleven rezafungin MICs for mutants overlapped with the MICs for wild-type isolates (TC plates, n = 4; UT plates, n = 7). For anidulafungin, five overlaps (all UT plates) were observed. Most overlaps (rezafungin, n = 5; anidulafungin, n = 3) were caused by fks mutants of C. tropicalis (Fks1, F650F/L) and C. glabrata (Fks2. D666Y; rezafungin, n = 2; anidulafungin, n = 1). Interlaboratory variation was low. The use of TC plates resulted in lower MICs, particularly for C. albicans and Falcon plates, ad this was more often the case for anidulafungin than for rezafungin. Adoption of TC plates for EUCAST antifungal susceptibility testing would improve interlaboratory reproducibility and the separation of non-wild-type and wild-type strains.

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Rezafungin (CD101) against Candida auris in the Neutropenic Mouse Invasive Candidiasis Model

Rezafungin (CD101) is a novel echinocandin under development for once-weekly intravenous (i.v.) dosing. We evaluated the pharmacodynamics (PD) of rezafungin against 4 Candida auris strains, using the neutropenic mouse invasive candidiasis model. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC was a robust predictor of efficacy (R ² = 0.76). The stasis free-drug 24-h AUC/MIC target exposure for the group was 1.88, whereas the 1-log-kill free-drug 24-h AUC/MIC target exposure was 5.77. These values are very similar to those in previous rezafungin PD studies with other Candida spp. Based on recent surveillance susceptibility data, AUC/MIC targets are likely to be exceeded for >90% of C. auris isolates with the previously studied human dose of 400 mg administered i.v. once weekly.

EUCAST Determination of Olorofim (F901318) Susceptibility of Mold Species, Method Validation, and MICs

Olorofim is a novel antifungal agent with in vitro activity against Aspergillus and some other molds. Here, we addressed technical aspects for EUCAST olorofim testing and generated contemporary MIC data. EUCAST E.Def 9.3.1 testing was performed comparing two plate preparation methods (serial dilution in medium [serial plates] versus predilution in DMSO [ISO plates]), two lots of olorofim, visual (visual-MIC) versus spectrophotometer (spec-MIC) reading, and four polystyrene plates using 34 to 53 Aspergillus isolates from five genera. Subsequently, olorofim MICs were compared to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and amphotericin B MICs for 298 clinical mold isolates (2016 to 2017). Wild-type upper limits (WT-UL) were determined following EUCAST principles for epidemiologic cutoff value (ECOFF) setting. Olorofim median MICs comparing serial plates and ISO plates were identical (25/36 [69%]) or one dilution apart (11/36 [31%]). Interperson agreement for visual-MICs was 92% to 94%/100% for ≤1/≤2 dilutions, respectively. The visual-MIC values across tested microtiter plates and olorofim lots revealed only discrete differences (≤1 dilution lower for treated plates). No single spec-MIC criterion was applicable to all species. Olorofim MICs were low against 275 Aspergillus species isolates (modal MIC, 0.06 mg/liter; MIC range, < 0.004 to 0.25 mg/liter) and three dermatophytes (MICs 0.03 to 0.06 mg/liter). MICs against Fusarium were diverse, with full inhibition of F. proliferatum (MIC, 0.016), 50% growth inhibition of Fusarium solani at 1 to 2 mg/liter, and no inhibition of F. dimerum Olorofim displayed potent in vitro activity against most mold isolates and was associated with limited variation in EUCAST susceptibility testing.