1
|
Demeter DV, Greene DJ. The promise of precision functional mapping for neuroimaging in psychiatry. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024:10.1038/s41386-024-01941-z. [PMID: 39085426 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01941-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Precision functional mapping (PFM) is a neuroimaging approach to reliably estimate metrics of brain function from individual people via the collection of large amounts of fMRI data (hours per person). This method has revealed much about the inter-individual variation of functional brain networks. While standard group-level studies, in which we average brain measures across groups of people, are important in understanding the generalizable neural underpinnings of neuropsychiatric disorders, many disorders are heterogeneous in nature. This heterogeneity often complicates clinical care, leading to patient uncertainty when considering prognosis or treatment options. We posit that PFM methods may help streamline clinical care in the future, fast-tracking the choice of personalized treatment that is most compatible with the individual. In this review, we provide a history of PFM studies, foundational results highlighting the benefits of PFM methods in the pursuit of an advanced understanding of individual differences in functional network organization, and possible avenues where PFM can contribute to clinical translation of neuroimaging research results in the way of personalized treatment in psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damion V Demeter
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Deanna J Greene
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fischer H, Nilsson ME, Ebner NC. Why the Single-N Design Should Be the Default in Affective Neuroscience. AFFECTIVE SCIENCE 2024; 5:62-66. [PMID: 38495781 PMCID: PMC10942943 DOI: 10.1007/s42761-023-00182-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Many studies in affective neuroscience rely on statistical procedures designed to estimate population averages and base their main conclusions on group averages. However, the obvious unit of analysis in affective neuroscience is the individual, not the group, because emotions are individual phenomena that typically vary across individuals. Conclusions based on group averages may therefore be misleading or wrong, if interpreted as statements about emotions of an individual, or meaningless, if interpreted as statements about the group, which has no emotions. We therefore advocate the Single-N design as the default strategy in research on emotions, testing one or several individuals extensively with the primary purpose of obtaining results at the individual level. In neuroscience, the equivalent to the Single-N design is deep imaging, the emerging trend of extensive measurements of activity in single brains. Apart from the fact that individuals react differently to emotional stimuli, they also vary in shape and size of their brains. Group-based analysis of brain imaging data therefore refers to an "average brain" that was activated in a way that may not be representative of the physiology of any of the tested individual brains, nor of how these brains responded to the experimental stimuli. Deep imaging avoids such group-averaging artifacts by simply focusing on the individual brain. This methodological shift toward individual analysis has already opened new research areas in fields like vision science. Inspired by this, we call for a corresponding shift in affective neuroscience, away from group averages, and toward experimental designs targeting the individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkan Fischer
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm University Brain Imaging Center (SUBIC), 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
| | - Mats E. Nilsson
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Natalie C. Ebner
- Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
- Institute of Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
- Florida Institute for Cybersecurity Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0165 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chauvin RJ, Newbold DJ, Nielsen AN, Miller RL, Krimmel SR, Metoki A, Wang A, Van AN, Montez DF, Marek S, Suljic V, Baden NJ, Ramirez-Perez N, Scheidter KM, Monk JS, Whiting FI, Adeyemo B, Snyder AZ, Kay BP, Raichle ME, Laumann TO, Gordon EM, Dosenbach NU. Disuse-driven plasticity in the human thalamus and putamen. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.11.07.566031. [PMID: 37987000 PMCID: PMC10659348 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.07.566031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Motor adaptation in cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops has been studied mainly in animals using invasive electrophysiology. Here, we leverage functional neuroimaging in humans to study motor circuit plasticity in the human subcortex. We employed an experimental paradigm that combined two weeks of upper-extremity immobilization with daily resting-state and motor task fMRI before, during, and after the casting period. We previously showed that limb disuse leads to decreased functional connectivity (FC) of the contralateral somatomotor cortex (SM1) with the ipsilateral somatomotor cortex, increased FC with the cingulo-opercular network (CON) as well as the emergence of high amplitude, fMRI signal pulses localized in the contralateral SM1, supplementary motor area and the cerebellum. From our prior observations, it remains unclear whether the disuse plasticity affects the thalamus and striatum. We extended our analysis to include these subcortical regions and found that both exhibit strengthened cortical FC and spontaneous fMRI signal pulses induced by limb disuse. The dorsal posterior putamen and the central thalamus, mainly CM, VLP and VIM nuclei, showed disuse pulses and FC changes that lined up with fmri task activations from the Human connectome project motor system localizer, acquired before casting for each participant. Our findings provide a novel understanding of the role of the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops in human motor plasticity and a potential link with the physiology of sleep regulation. Additionally, similarities with FC observation from Parkinson Disease (PD) questions a pathophysiological link with limb disuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roselyne J. Chauvin
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Dillan J. Newbold
- Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Ashley N. Nielsen
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Ryland L. Miller
- Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Samuel R. Krimmel
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Athanasia Metoki
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Anxu Wang
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Andrew N. Van
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Division of Computation and Data Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - David F. Montez
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Scott Marek
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Vahdeta Suljic
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Noah J. Baden
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | | | - Kristen M. Scheidter
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Julia S. Monk
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Forrest I. Whiting
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Babatunde Adeyemo
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Abraham Z. Snyder
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Benjamin P. Kay
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Marcus E. Raichle
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Timothy O. Laumann
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Evan M. Gordon
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Nico U.F. Dosenbach
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van AN, Montez DF, Laumann TO, Suljic V, Madison T, Baden NJ, Ramirez-Perez N, Scheidter KM, Monk JS, Whiting FI, Adeyemo B, Chauvin RJ, Krimmel SR, Metoki A, Rajesh A, Roland JL, Salo T, Wang A, Weldon KB, Sotiras A, Shimony JS, Kay BP, Nelson SM, Tervo-Clemmens B, Marek SA, Vizioli L, Yacoub E, Satterthwaite TD, Gordon EM, Fair DA, Tisdall MD, Dosenbach NU. Framewise multi-echo distortion correction for superior functional MRI. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.28.568744. [PMID: 38077010 PMCID: PMC10705259 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.28.568744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) data are severely distorted by magnetic field (B0) inhomogeneities which currently must be corrected using separately acquired field map data. However, changes in the head position of a scanning participant across fMRI frames can cause changes in the B0 field, preventing accurate correction of geometric distortions. Additionally, field maps can be corrupted by movement during their acquisition, preventing distortion correction altogether. In this study, we use phase information from multi-echo (ME) fMRI data to dynamically sample distortion due to fluctuating B0 field inhomogeneity across frames by acquiring multiple echoes during a single EPI readout. Our distortion correction approach, MEDIC (Multi-Echo DIstortion Correction), accurately estimates B0 related distortions for each frame of multi-echo fMRI data. Here, we demonstrate that MEDIC's framewise distortion correction produces improved alignment to anatomy and decreases the impact of head motion on resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) maps, in higher motion data, when compared to the prior gold standard approach (i.e., TOPUP). Enhanced framewise distortion correction with MEDIC, without the requirement for field map collection, furthers the advantage of multi-echo over single-echo fMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew N. Van
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - David F. Montez
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Timothy O. Laumann
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Vahdeta Suljic
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Thomas Madison
- Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Noah J. Baden
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | | | - Kristen M. Scheidter
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Julia S. Monk
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Forrest I. Whiting
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Babatunde Adeyemo
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Roselyne J. Chauvin
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Samuel R. Krimmel
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Athanasia Metoki
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Aishwarya Rajesh
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Jarod L. Roland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Taylor Salo
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104
| | - Anxu Wang
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Division of Computation and Data Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Kimberly B. Weldon
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Institute for Informatics, Data Science & Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Joshua S. Shimony
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Benjamin P. Kay
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Steven M. Nelson
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Brenden Tervo-Clemmens
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Scott A. Marek
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Luca Vizioli
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104
| | - Evan M. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Damien A. Fair
- Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - M. Dylan Tisdall
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Nico U.F. Dosenbach
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yip SW, Barch DM, Chase HW, Flagel S, Huys QJ, Konova AB, Montague R, Paulus M. From Computation to Clinic. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY GLOBAL OPEN SCIENCE 2023; 3:319-328. [PMID: 37519475 PMCID: PMC10382698 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Theory-driven and data-driven computational approaches to psychiatry have enormous potential for elucidating mechanism of disease and providing translational linkages between basic science findings and the clinic. These approaches have already demonstrated utility in providing clinically relevant understanding, primarily via back translation from clinic to computation, revealing how specific disorders or symptoms map onto specific computational processes. Nonetheless, forward translation, from computation to clinic, remains rare. In addition, consensus regarding specific barriers to forward translation-and on the best strategies to overcome these barriers-is limited. This perspective review brings together expert basic and computationally trained researchers and clinicians to 1) identify challenges specific to preclinical model systems and clinical translation of computational models of cognition and affect, and 2) discuss practical approaches to overcoming these challenges. In doing so, we highlight recent evidence for the ability of computational approaches to predict treatment responses in psychiatric disorders and discuss considerations for maximizing the clinical relevance of such models (e.g., via longitudinal testing) and the likelihood of stakeholder adoption (e.g., via cost-effectiveness analyses).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah W. Yip
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Deanna M. Barch
- Departments of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Henry W. Chase
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Shelly Flagel
- Department of Psychiatry and Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Quentin J.M. Huys
- Division of Psychiatry and Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna B. Konova
- Department of Psychiatry and Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Read Montague
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute and Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
| | - Martin Paulus
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Michon KJ, Khammash D, Simmonite M, Hamlin AM, Polk TA. Person-specific and precision neuroimaging: Current methods and future directions. Neuroimage 2022; 263:119589. [PMID: 36030062 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Most neuroimaging studies of brain function analyze data in normalized space to identify regions of common activation across participants. These studies treat interindividual differences in brain organization as noise, but this approach can obscure important information about the brain's functional architecture. Recently, a number of studies have adopted a person-specific approach that aims to characterize these individual differences and explore their reliability and implications for behavior. A subset of these studies has taken a precision imaging approach that collects multiple hours of data from each participant to map brain function on a finer scale. In this review, we provide a broad overview of how person-specific and precision imaging techniques have used resting-state measures to examine individual differences in the brain's organization and their impact on behavior, followed by how task-based activity continues to add detail to these discoveries. We argue that person-specific and precision approaches demonstrate substantial promise in uncovering new details of the brain's functional organization and its relationship to behavior in many areas of cognitive neuroscience. We also discuss some current limitations in this new field and some new directions it may take.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dalia Khammash
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Molly Simmonite
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Abbey M Hamlin
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Thad A Polk
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Korom M, Camacho MC, Filippi CA, Licandro R, Moore LA, Dufford A, Zöllei L, Graham AM, Spann M, Howell B, Shultz S, Scheinost D. Dear reviewers: Responses to common reviewer critiques about infant neuroimaging studies. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2021; 53:101055. [PMID: 34974250 PMCID: PMC8733260 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The field of adult neuroimaging relies on well-established principles in research design, imaging sequences, processing pipelines, as well as safety and data collection protocols. The field of infant magnetic resonance imaging, by comparison, is a young field with tremendous scientific potential but continuously evolving standards. The present article aims to initiate a constructive dialog between researchers who grapple with the challenges and inherent limitations of a nascent field and reviewers who evaluate their work. We address 20 questions that researchers commonly receive from research ethics boards, grant, and manuscript reviewers related to infant neuroimaging data collection, safety protocols, study planning, imaging sequences, decisions related to software and hardware, and data processing and sharing, while acknowledging both the accomplishments of the field and areas of much needed future advancements. This article reflects the cumulative knowledge of experts in the FIT’NG community and can act as a resource for both researchers and reviewers alike seeking a deeper understanding of the standards and tradeoffs involved in infant neuroimaging. The field of infant MRI is young with evolving standards. We address 20 questions that researchers commonly receive reviewers. These come from research ethics boards, grant, and manuscript reviewers. This article reflects the cumulative knowledge of experts in the FIT’NG community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Korom
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
| | - M Catalina Camacho
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences (Neurosciences), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Courtney A Filippi
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roxane Licandro
- Institute of Visual Computing and Human-Centered Technology, Computer Vision Lab, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Computational Imaging Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lucille A Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alexander Dufford
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lilla Zöllei
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alice M Graham
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Marisa Spann
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brittany Howell
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Department of Human Development and Family Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | | | - Sarah Shultz
- Division of Autism & Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Marcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Dustin Scheinost
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gratton C, Braga RM. Editorial overview: Deep imaging of the individual brain: past, practice, and promise. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|