Daily activity patterns in remitted first-episode schizophrenia

The burden of disease in early schizophrenia - a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disorder with a burden that can vary greatly depending on the severity and the duration. Previous research has suggested that patients in the earlier stages of schizophrenia (typically first-episode schizophrenia) benefit from effective early treatment, however, a comprehensive review of the burden specifically in this population has not been undertaken. A systematic literature review was therefore conducted to characterize the clinical, economic, and humanistic burden, as reported in naturalistic studies of schizophrenia populations specifically at an early stage of disease in comparison with healthy controls, patients with chronic schizophrenia, and patients with other psychiatric disorders.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, PsycINFO, and EconLit databases for records published between January 2005 and April 2019, and of relevant conference abstracts published between January 2014 and May 2019. Data were extracted from relevant publications and subjected to qualitative evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifty-two publications were identified for inclusion and revealed a considerable burden for early schizophrenia with regards to mortality, psychiatric comorbidities such as substance abuse and depression, poor social functioning, and unemployment. Comparisons with chronic schizophrenia suggested a greater burden with longer disease duration, while comparisons with other psychiatric disorders were inconclusive. This review uncovered various gaps in the available literature, including limited or no data on incarcerations, caregiver burden, and costs associated with early schizophrenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the burden of schizophrenia is apparent even in the early stages of the disease, although further research is required to quantify the burden with chronic schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.

Diverse definitions of the early course of schizophrenia-a targeted literature review

Schizophrenia is a debilitating psychiatric disorder and patients experience significant comorbidity, especially cognitive and psychosocial deficits, already at the onset of disease. Previous research suggests that treatment during the earlier stages of disease reduces disease burden, and that a longer time of untreated psychosis has a negative impact on treatment outcomes. A targeted literature review was conducted to gain insight into the definitions currently used to describe patients with a recent diagnosis of schizophrenia in the early course of disease ('early' schizophrenia). A total of 483 relevant English-language publications of clinical guidelines and studies were identified for inclusion after searches of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, relevant clinical trial databases and Google for records published between January 2005 and October 2015. The extracted data revealed a wide variety of terminology and definitions used to describe patients with 'early' or 'recent-onset' schizophrenia, with no apparent consensus. The most commonly used criteria to define patients with early schizophrenia included experience of their first episode of schizophrenia or disease duration of less than 1, 2 or 5 years. These varied definitions likely result in substantial disparities of patient populations between studies and variable population heterogeneity. Better agreement on the definition of early schizophrenia could aid interpretation and comparison of studies in this patient population and consensus on definitions should allow for better identification and management of schizophrenia patients in the early course of their disease.

Objective investigation of activity preference in schizophrenia: A pilot study

Amotivation and reduced goal-directed activity engagement are prominent features of schizophrenia. Previous investigations of patients' activities have relied on accounts of daily living activities, rather than objective measures. This study used wireless motion capture to objectively evaluate activity preference when individuals are provided an explicit choice between an active versus passive engagement option. Twenty outpatients with schizophrenia and twenty matched healthy controls completed the Activity Preference Task, in which participants play a motion-based game (active) or watch a film (passive), and were administered clinical and cognitive assessments. Schizophrenia participants' duration, intensity, and persistence of active engagement were associated with apathy and community functioning. No group differences emerged from comparisons of task measures; however, exploratory cluster analysis identified a distinct subgroup of schizophrenia patients with reduced engagement and increased apathy compared to other patients and controls. The Task provides a means of quantifying activity engagement, which may be particularly valuable given the lack of objective measures for intrinsically motivated behaviours. Our initial findings suggest that schizophrenia patients as a group are equally inclined as healthy individuals towards actively engaging activities when presented an explicit choice, but such provision may be insufficient for initiation and maintenance of functional behaviours among amotivated patients.

Immediate affective motivation is not impaired in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Among the various cognitive and affective evaluations that contribute to decisions about whether to engage in a future activity, three affective evaluations are particularly relevant: 1) interest in the activity itself, 2) the pleasure anticipated from the activity and 3) the excitement experienced while looking forward to the activity. In addition to these pre-activity evaluations, affective evaluations that are done after the activity is completed impact people's motivation to repeat the same activity. Although extant research suggests that these affective processes may be impaired in schizophrenia, it is not clear whether these impairments are mostly secondary to cognitive deficits.

METHOD

In three independent studies utilizing simple laboratory tasks with minimal cognitive demands, patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and healthy control subjects evaluated their pleasure, interest, and excitement immediately before and after completing the tasks.

RESULTS

Patients' anticipated pleasure and posttest evaluations of pleasure and interest were significantly greater than controls'. No group differences were found for excitement. In patients, there were significant negative correlations between anticipated pleasure, pretest excitement and depression scores, and between pretest interest and negative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

In these experiments, immediate affective evaluations reported by participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were greater or similar to controls'. This finding is consistent with recent affective research showing that experiences of pleasure are intact in schizophrenia. These results emphasize the need to disentangle affective from cognitive processes in order to better understand the complex impairments present in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Relationship between clinical improvement and functional gains with clozapine in schizophrenia

Impairment in psychosocial functioning is a key feature in schizophrenia, but few studies have examined the relationship between improvements in symptoms and functioning. We examined the relationship between change in symptoms and change in functioning in a group of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia after 6 and 12 weeks of clozapine treatment. Participants were assessed prior to clozapine and again at 6 and 12-week on the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS). Change scores in BPRS and SOFAS at 6 and 12-week post-clozapine were calculated and the direct relationship was assessed via regression models. Forty-three participants were included in this study; age of sample was 42.1 ± 12.7 years, with 31 (72.1%) male participants. At baseline, the mean BPRS total and SOFAS scores were 46.98 ± 12.86 and 33.07 ± 10.79, respectively. There were significant improvements in BPRS total and SOFAS scores at 6 weeks, but no significant differences between 6 and 12-week assessments. There was no significant change in negative symptoms at both follow-up assessments. At 6-week, change in symptoms was not correlated with change in functioning and while the relationship between change in symptoms and functioning was stronger at 12 weeks, none of the BPRS factors emerged as a significant predictor. The present study found that lower baseline SOFAS score was the most robust predictor for improvements in SOFAS at 6 and 12-weeks. There appears to be a "ceiling" for functional improvements on clozapine, but follow-up studies are needed to examine functional gains beyond 12 weeks.