Study design and rationale for a randomized controlled trial to assess effectiveness of stochastic vibrotactile mattress stimulation versus standard non-oscillating crib mattress for treating hospitalized opioid-exposed newborns

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: An Ecological View of Non-Pharmacologic Interventions for Feeding Success

The number of infants diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) or neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) has increased. The expression of NAS/NOWS symptoms differs and typically begins within the first few days of life, considered a critical period for feeding skill establishment, nourishment, and attachment. Non-pharmacologic interventions may be deployed to reduce or eliminate the need for replacement opioids while targeting outcomes like feeding dysfunction. Critical care providers can benefit from a structured examination of disordered feeding experiences to inform their selection of non-pharmacologic interventions. This structure can be provided using the Ecology of Human Performance model.

Efficacy of a Vibrating Crib Mattress to Reduce Pharmacologic Treatment in Opioid-Exposed Newborns: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Pharmacologic agents are often used to treat newborns with prenatal opioid exposure (POE) despite known adverse effects on neurodevelopment. Alternative nonpharmacological interventions are needed.

Objective

To examine efficacy of a vibrating crib mattress for treating newborns with POE.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this dual-site randomized clinical trial, 208 term newborns with POE, enrolled from March 9, 2017, to March 10, 2020, were studied at their bedside throughout hospitalization.

Interventions

Half the cohort received treatment as usual (TAU) and half received standard care plus low-level stochastic (random) vibrotactile stimulation (SVS) using a uniquely constructed crib mattress with a 3-hour on-off cycle. Study initiated in the newborn unit where newborns were randomized to TAU or SVS within 48 hours of birth. All infants whose symptoms met clinical criteria for pharmacologic treatment received morphine in the neonatal intensive care unit per standard care.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The a priori primary outcomes analyzed were pharmacotherapy (administration of morphine treatment [AMT], first-line medication at both study sites [number of infants treated], and cumulative morphine dose) and hospital length of stay. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.

Results

Analyses were performed on 181 newborns who completed hospitalization at the study sites (mean [SD] gestational age, 39.0 [1.2] weeks; mean [SD] birth weight, 3076 (489) g; 100 [55.2%] were female). Of the 181 analyzed infants, 121 (66.9%) were discharged without medication and 60 (33.1%) were transferred to the NICU for morphine treatment (31 [51.7%] TAU and 29 [48.3%] SVS). Treatment rate was not significantly different in the 2 groups: 35.6% (31 of 87 infants who received TAU) and 30.9% (29 of 94 infants who received SVS) (P = .60). Adjusting for site, sex, birth weight, opioid exposure, and feed type, infant duration on the vibrating mattress in the newborn unit was associated with reduction in AMT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88 hours per day; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93 hours per day). This translated to a 50% relative reduction in AMT for infants who received SVS on average 6 hours per day. Among 32 infants transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit for morphine treatment who completed treatment within 3 weeks, those assigned to SVS finished treatment nearly twice as fast (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.01-3.81), resulting in 3.18 fewer treatment days (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.04 days) and receiving a mean 1.76 mg/kg less morphine (95% CI, -3.02 to -0.50 mg/kg) than the TAU cohort. No effects of condition were observed among infants treated for more than 3 weeks (n = 28).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this clinical trial suggest that SVS may serve as a complementary nonpharmacologic intervention for newborns with POE. Reducing pharmacotherapy with SVS has implications for reduced hospitalization stays and costs, and possibly improved infant outcomes given the known adverse effects of morphine on neurodevelopment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02801331.

Actigraphy: An Adjunctive Method to Measure Irritability in Opioid-Exposed Newborns

Background and purpose: Conventional measures of withdrawal in newborns with prenatal opioid exposure (POE) rely on nursing assessments, including the subjective judgment of infant irritability. This study investigated limb movement actigraphy as a tool for providing an objective, quantifiable measure of underlying distress. Methods: Correlational analyses compared continuous physiological-detected movement actigraphy and clinical intervallic-scored symptomology (modified Finnegan system) obtained from a control cohort of 37 term neonates with POE studied in their crib in the newborn unit (1-8 days). Results: Infants spent 15% crib time in high movement activity (>100 movements/minute; index irritability) and 38% crib time in low activity (0-5 movements/minute; index calm). There was a significant positive association between actigraphy and Finnegan composite score (r = .28, P = .001) and between actigraphy and subcomponent scores (i.e., central nervous system, gastrointestinal, and metabolic-vasomotor-respiratory). Conclusion: Movement activity via actigraphy captures underlying distress and calm not measured by conventional assessments. Such objective, quantifiable measures can serve to promote equitable assessment and treatment of hospitalized newborns with POE.

Physiologic dysregulation in newborns with prenatal opioid exposure: Cardiac, respiratory and movement activity

BACKGROUND

Newborns with prenatal opioid exposure (POE) are commonly diagnosed with neonatal abstinence/opioid-withdrawal syndromes due to characteristic symptoms and overt behaviors. However, little is known about the underlying physiology of opioid-exposed newborns.

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac, respiratory and movement activity were measured to identify physiologic dysregulation and quantify pathophysiologic instabilities of the central and autonomic nervous systems in POE newborns.

METHODS

In this pilot study, 30 hospitalized POE newborns (>35 wks gestational age) participated in one of two study phases wherein physiologic activity was measured for an 8-10 h session. In Phase 1, 17 infants received usual treatment to provide a general assessment of physiologic activity. In Phase 2, 13 infants participated in an interventional study (NCT02768844) using a prototype mattress that delivered stochastic vibratory stimulation (SVS). Changes in physiologic activity were compared for device on (N) and off (F) for three interfeed periods (FNF or NFN).

RESULTS

Phase 1 showed that although infants' heart rate was on average within normal newborn range (mean 137 bpm, SD 7), infants were tachycardic 16% of the study period and tachypneic (mean 74 breaths/min, SD 13) 62% of the period. Infants moved 33% of the period; 17% were durations >30 s. In Phase 2, heart rate, respiratory rate, movement duration and frequency were each reduced for SVS N compared to SVS F in the FNF protocol (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Findings support that physiologic measures can identify dysregulation not captured with current withdrawal scoring assessments. Larger studies are warranted to assess if mattress SVS helps regulate pathophysiologic instabilities in infants with POE.

Actigraphy: Metrics reveal it is not a valid tool for determining sleep in neonates

Study of emerging sleep-wake patterns in neonates is important for promptly identifying and treating abnormal sleep behaviours to ensure healthy infant development and neurobehavioral outcomes. Current methods to assess sleep are costly, labour intensive, and particularly difficult to implement in fragile, hospitalised infants requiring intensive medical care. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of actigraphy as a tool for detecting sleep in preterm infants, using polysomnography (PSG) as the "gold standard". A total of 10 neonates (mean [SD] 35.8 [1.2] weeks post-menstrual age; five female) hospitalised since birth for prematurity each participated in one 8-10 hr session during which PSG and actigraphy were recorded simultaneously. Inter-feed minute-by-minute PSG Sleep-Wake scores were compared to concurrent actigraph epochs categorised as either "Sleep" or "Wake" using three separate movement-per-minute thresholds (≤20, ≤40, ≤80). Tool validity was assessed using five metrics. A key finding was that for each of the movement thresholds there was high agreement rate, sensitivity, and predictive value of sleep (85.2%-97.2%), whereas specificity and predictive value of wake remained low (12%-46%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis also revealed low discriminatory power of actigraphy for estimating sleep (area under the curve = 0.636; Youden's Index J = 0.2173). Lack of sufficient minutes of autonomous wake periods among infants was identified as a key limitation in actigraphy. Findings from the present study suggest actigraphy cannot be validated for Sleep/Wake discrimination in preterm infants and that proper validation requires sufficient data from periods of both Sleep and Wake.