Design of a randomized controlled trial of digital health and community health worker support for diabetes management among low-income patients

Digital intervention for public health: searching for implementing characteristics, concepts and recommendations: scoping review

Studying the impact of digital interventions on public health can help ensure that the offered services produce the desired results. In order to address these factors, the subsequent study uses a scope review to evaluate the state of the field while concentrating on ideas and suggestions that represent factors that have been crucial in the management of digital intervention for public health. To shed light on the traits, ideas and suggestions related to public health digital intervention, a scoping review was carried out. Five electronic databases were used to locate pertinent research that were published before February 2022. All texts were examined, and study abstracts were scrutinized to determine their eligibility. The last analysis of this study included fifteen publications; five reviews, four qualitative studies, two quantitative studies, one viewpoint study, one mixed-method study, one perspective study, and one interventional study. The key ideas for digital interventions in population management and health studies are presented in this overview. Many concepts, implementation characteristics and recommendations have been raised which highlight the future role of these interventions to enhance public engagement and health equity.

Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support for Diabetes Management: a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital health intervention plus community health worker (CHW) support on self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Urban outpatient clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult Medicaid beneficiaries living with diabetes and treated with insulin and who had a HbA1c ≥ 9%.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to one of three arms. Participants in the usual-care arm received a wireless glucometer if needed. Those in the digital arm received a lottery incentive for daily glucose monitoring. Those in the hybrid arm received the lottery plus support from a CHW if they had low adherence or high blood glucose levels.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the difference in adherence to daily glucose self-monitoring at 3 months between the hybrid and usual-care arms. The secondary outcome was difference in HbA1c from baseline at 6 months.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 150 participants were enrolled in the study. A total of 102 participants (68%) completed the study. At 3 months, glucose self-monitoring rates in the hybrid versus usual-care arms were 0.72 vs 0.65, p = 0.23. At 6 months, change in HbA1c in the hybrid versus usual-care arms was - 0.74% vs - 0.49%, p = 0.69.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences between the hybrid and usual care in glucose self-monitoring adherence or improvements in HbA1C.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03939793.