Treating Charcot Arthropathy Is a Challenge: Explaining Why My Treatment Algorithm Has Changed

Considerations in Charcot Reconstruction

Charcot deformity is a challenging condition often leading to foot and ankle deformity that subsequently causes decreased function, ulceration, infection, and limb loss. There are various treatment measures to take into consideration when managing these patients. Treatment approaches range from conservative casting to surgical reconstruction. The authors believe that when faced with deformity, aggressive reconstruction to maintain a plantigrade foot and prevent loss of function is critical. Because of the nature of the Charcot condition, timing and fixation are often debated. This article discusses the authors' approach to Charcot reconstruction in a large integrated health care system.

High rate of complications after corrective midfoot/subtalar arthrodesis and Achilles tendon lengthening in Charcot arthropathy type Sanders 2 and 3

PURPOSE

Corrective midfoot resection arthrodesis is the standard treatment of Charcot arthropathy type Sanders 2 and 3 with severe dislocation. In order to critically evaluate the effect of surgical correction, a retrospective analysis of our patient cohort was performed. Hereby, special emphasis was set on the analysis of the pre- and post-operative equinus position of the hindfoot.

METHODS

Retrospectively, all patients (n = 82) after midfoot resection arthrodesis in Charcot type Sanders 2 or 3 were included. Complications were recorded, and the mean complication-free interval was calculated. Additionally, the calcaneal pitch as well as Meary's angle were measured pre- and post-operatively and in case of complications.

RESULTS

Overall complication rate was 89%. Revision surgery was necessary in 46% of all patients. The mean complication-free interval was 285 days (0-1560 days). Calcaneal pitch and Meary's angle significantly improved after operation but returned to pre-operative values after onset of complications. Achilles tendon lengthening showed no significant effects on the mean complication-free interval.

CONCLUSION

Operative treatment of Charcot arthropathy remains a surgical challenge with high complication rates. Surgical correction of equinus position has been highlighted for successful treatment but was not able to prevent complications in this study, which is demonstrated by the recurrent decrease of the calcaneal pitch in cases of reoperation. Therefore, as a conclusion of our results, our treatment algorithm changed towards primarily addressing the equinus malpositioning of the hindfoot by corrective arthrodesis of the hindfoot.

Plate Fixation in Midfoot and Ankle Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Surgical reconstruction of Charcot arthropathy in the foot and ankle is extremely difficult. The fundamentals of reconstruction are necessary to provide adequate outcome. Removing and resecting the diseased bone is needed along with good anatomic alignment and rigid fixation. This reconstructive surgery is not only difficult from medical management point of view but also involves patient compliance and good technical components of the surgery from the surgeon. The surgeon must have skills with internal and external fixation, a good understanding of lower extremity vascular disease, and a good understanding of infectious disease and plastic surgical techniques of the lower extremity.

Success and Survivorship Following Charcot Reconstruction: A Review of 151 Cases

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a debilitating condition that frequently leads to skeletal deformity and pedal ulceration in the insensate foot. Results are often poor and no clear guidelines for surgical management exist. Additionally, amputation rates vary widely making it difficult to accurately inform patients of risks. Few studies have assessed outcomes to identify patients for whom reconstruction is likely to fail. The literature is limited, with small sample sizes and mortality infrequently addressed. We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy to assess overall amputation and mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years postreconstruction and evaluated associated risk factors. Rates of infection, re-ulceration, and return to walking were also assessed. We identified 151 patients over a 5-year period. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Descriptive statistics, Cox proportional hazard model, and logistic regression were used. Overall, 22 (14.6%) patients died, and 23 (15.2%) patients advanced to limb amputation postoperatively. End-stage renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, reconstruction during active phase Charcot process, and reconstruction at the ankle or subtalar joint were all associated with poor outcomes. The risk of mortality was 2.5 times higher in patients with end-stage renal disease, and 3.4 times higher among patients with peripheral vascular disease. Patients with ankle or subtalar joint reconstruction were 70% less likely to return to walking compared to medial column reconstruction. Due to these findings, we suggest that patients with such comorbidities be advised of increased risk for complications including failure to return to walking, amputation, and death.

Factors impacting the evidence-based assessment, diagnosis and management of Acute Charcot Neuroarthropathy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute Charcot Neuroarthropathy (CN) is a destructive condition that is characterised by acute fractures, dislocations and joint destruction in the weight-bearing foot. The acute phase is often misdiagnosed and can rapidly lead to devastating health outcomes. Early diagnosis and management of CN is imperative to attenuate progression of this condition. Consequently, timely evidence-based assessment, diagnosis and management of acute CN is imperative.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors that impact the delivery of evidence-based care in assessment, diagnosis and management of people with acute CN.

METHOD

Systematic searches were conducted in four databases to identify studies in English that included factors that impact the delivery of evidence-based care in the assessment, diagnosis and management of people with acute CN. Articles and consensus/guideline documents were assessed for inclusion by the researchers and disagreements were resolved through consensus. Additionally backward citation searching was used to source other potentially relevant documents. Information relevant to the research question was extracted and thematic analyses were performed using qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles and four additional consensus/guideline documents were included for data extraction and analyses. Information related to the research question was of expert opinion using the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Levels of Evidence guidelines. Themes explaining practices that deviated from evidence-based care in assessment, diagnosis and management of acute CN centred around patient, health professional and health organisation/environmental. Delay to diagnosis is particularly influenced by the patient's knowledge of when to seek help, practitioner knowledge in knowing how to recognise and refer for appropriate immediate care, confusion in imaging and offloading and geographical and local health service resources to appropriately manage the condition.

CONCLUSION

Individual and health professional awareness and geographical barriers are key challenges to the effective delivery of evidence-based assessment, diagnosis and management of people with acute CN. Acute CN represents a medical emergency warranting the need for expedited assessment, diagnosis and management by appropriately trained health professionals in the appropriate.

Diabetic Foot Management: How Could a Procedural Pathway Improve the Surgical Outcome?

Introduction:

Diabetic foot ulcer is the main aetiology for non-traumatic amputation, which is a major public health care concern. A multidisciplinary approach in the management of this pathology has been shown to improve the surgical outcome. However, there are little data available on the tools we can use to pursue this multidisciplinary approach. The main goal of this cross-sectional study was to find out whether the implementation of a specific management pathway could improve the treatment outcome in the treatment of diabetic foot.

Materials and Methods:

From 2012 to 2014, we consecutively recruited patients with diabetic foot referred to Orthopaedic surgery department of our university for surgical opinion. A specific diabetic foot pathway was introduced in 2013. One group of patients who were treated with previous method were evaluated retrospectively. Another group of patients who were treated after implementation of the pathway were evaluated prospectively. We compared treatment outcome between the two groups.

Results:

We included 51 patients. Amputation rate was similar both the groups: 74% in the retrospective group not using the new pathway versus 73% in a prospective group that used the new pathway. Revision surgery was 39% in the retrospective group and 14% in the prospective group (p=0.05).

Conclusion:

We recommend the use of this simple and cost-effective pathway to guide the interdisciplinary management of diabetic foot. A prospective study with more subjects would provide a better overview of this management pathway.

Charcot Neuroarthropathy Advances: Understanding Pathogenesis and Medical and Surgical Management

Understanding new theories of the epidemiology of Charcot neuroarthropathy is practice changing. Treatment of Charcot neuroarthropathy is evolving from a passive approach to one that sees the urgency of proactive, early recognition, thereby avoiding the cascading events that lead to the complex, limb-threatening deformities. Preventive medicine is the most efficient at avoiding severe deformity, with prolonged offloading and immobilization as the current mainstay of treatment. However, with recent advancements in medical and surgical modalities, this may become the treatment of the past as clinicians begin to favor medical management and early surgical intervention.