Impact of COVID-19 on radiology training: Royal College of Radiologists Junior Radiologists Forum national survey

Long-term quality improvement in radiology specialty training at a tertiary cardiothoracic centre

OBJECTIVES

This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to foster radiology training at a regional tertiary cardiothoracic centre that had very low trainee satisfaction rankings.

METHODS

To study the problem and intervene timely, multiple methods were applied, including a local feedback survey, placement reorganisation, consultant encouragement to train as accredited supervisors, followed by departmental education portal creation and start of externally funded Visiting Fellowships and salaried Clinical Fellowships. The regional rating was monitored. The local feedback survey was distributed and analysed using descriptive statistics. Alongside the QIP, service expansion occurred.

RESULTS

The site regionally ranked 9/19 in 2 years. Local survey responses (53) showed continuous improvement; cardiothoracic subspecialty interest (+39%) and audit/academic involvement (+36%) increased. Multiple Fellowships were completed; internationally reputable placements were agreed upon. Most consultants trained as supervisors. Per increased demand, compulsory deanery posts were changed to motivation-based, and an additional salaried position was offered. Five fellows stayed in the region as subspecialist consultants. Unexpected challenges included space and workstation loss with service expansion, lack of regional surveys since 2019, and the global pandemic. Regardless, the results were positive with subspecialty interest and projected reputational effect increase. Local long-term survey provided sustainable data in detecting improvement areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the national radiologist shortage, this quality improvement project shows a possible positive impact of similar interventions, including workforce retention/recruitment and thus improving patient care.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Continuous feedback and quality improvement maintenance are valuable to enhance training quality locally and beyond.

Paediatric radiology training in the UK: a national trainee survey by the British Society of Paediatric Radiologists (BSPR)

AIM

To survey current UK radiology trainee experiences and opinions regarding the quality of paediatric radiology training encountered in their core years, and assess their career ambitions with regards to paediatric radiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 22-question online survey, approved by the BSPR committee, was promoted over 12 months (1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023) across current radiology trainees and fellows via regional radiology training programme directors (TPDs), Junior Radiology Forum (JRF) trainee representatives, at BSPR Junior Forum webinar teaching sessions, and via social media/word of mouth.

RESULTS

Eighty-three UK survey responses were received from 17/19 (89%) training schemes. Sixty of the 83 (72%) had taken or were due to take a 2-4 month core paediatric radiology placement partly at tertiary centres (66/83, 80%), with 67/83 (81%) receiving dedicated didactic teaching. Only 26/83 (31%) reported fulfilling core curriculum competencies and 32/83 (39%) reported not receiving enough paediatric radiology training. Almost a quarter (18/83, 22%) reported <2 months of paediatric radiology rotation during core training and 12% (10/83) across six training schemes, reported no dedicated paediatric teaching sessions. Respondents who left negative comments around their experience were more likely to reject paediatric radiology as a future career option (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 31% of UK radiology trainees reported having enough paediatric radiology training to achieve core competencies. Standardised training, teaching, and increased on-call support could improve confidence in dealing with emergency cases and encourage interest in paediatric radiology beyond junior years.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Radiology Department Employees and Trainees in Al-Qassim, 2021

Objectives This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiology department employees and trainees. It also compared the impact of COVID-19 to the pre-COVID-19 era in the Al-Qassim region. Methods This was a quantitative observational analytical cross-sectional study conducted in the largest government hospitals under the Ministry of Health (MOH) in Al-Qassim. A pre-determined questionnaire was distributed among radiology staff that included demographic characteristics, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among radiology staff, the behavior of staff related to COVID-19 infection, and the assessment of mental health using the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9). Results Eighty-four radiology staff were recruited (64.3% males vs 35.7% females). Of these, 66.7% were trainees and the rest were employees (33.3%). Of the trainees, 32.1% and 42.9% thought that elective imaging, procedures, and outpatient/clinic exposures were reduced during the pandemic, and 37.5% indicated that their training had been affected negatively. The prevalence of depression among radiology staff was 36.9%. The prevalence of depression was substantially higher among radiology trainees (p=0.038), those who were not infected with COVID-16 (p=0.041), and those who indicated that their studying time increased at the time of the pandemic (p=0.047). However, after conducting multivariate regression analysis, these variables did not seem to have significantly affected depression (p>0.05). Conclusion Training and medical education have been affected negatively because of the outbreak. Studying time and research activities of employees and trainees slowed down, which could be critical to their careers. Trainees complained about the significant reduction in their exposure to clinics and imaging procedures. Therefore, a method to safeguard the well-being of employees and trainees in the radiology department is necessary to limit the impact of such pandemics.

Education and Training Adaptations for Health Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Lessons Learned and Innovations

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has considerably impacted the clinical education and training of health workers globally, causing severe disruptions to learning environments in healthcare facilities and limiting the acquisition of new clinical skills. Consequently, urgent adaptation measures, including simulation training and e-learning, have been implemented to mitigate the adverse effects of clinical education. This scoping review aims to assess the impact of COVID-19 on medical education and training, examine the implemented adaptation measures, and evaluate their effectiveness in improving health workers' education and training during the pandemic. Methods: Employing the PRISMA-ScR framework and Arksey and O'Malley's methodological guidance, we conducted a scoping review, systematically searching PubMed, medRxiv, Google, and DuckDuckGo databases to account for the grey literature. The search included studies published between 1 December 2019 and 13 October 2021, yielding 10,323 results. Of these, 88 studies focused on health worker education and training during the pandemic. Results: Our review incorporated 31,268 participants, including physicians, medical trainees, nurses, paramedics, students, and health educators. Most studies (71/88, 81%) were conducted in high-income and lower-middle-income countries. The pandemic's effects on health workers' clinical skills and abilities have necessitated training period extensions in some cases. We identified several positive outcomes from the implementation of simulation training and e-learning as adaptation strategies, such as enhanced technical and clinical performance, increased confidence and comfort, and an expanded global educational outreach. Conclusions: Despite challenges like insufficient practical experience, limited interpersonal interaction opportunities, and internet connectivity issues, simulation training, e-learning, and virtual training have proven effective in improving clinical education and training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is required to bolster preparedness for future pandemics or similar situations.

[Status and recommendations for interventional radiological procedures in COVID-19 patients]

BACKGROUND

Particularly at the beginning, the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic caused a reduction in the number of interventions in interventional radiology. At the same time, interventional training became more challenging. Infectious patients and disease transmission within interventional radiology departments continue to pose significant challenges.

OBJECTIVES

This article describes the status and recommendations for interventional radiological procedures in COVID-19 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Guidelines and recommendations from international and national societies as well as original works and reviews were evaluated.

RESULTS

Interventional radiological care of COVID-19 patients with complicated courses of infection has become established during the course of the pandemic. To protect patients and staff, interventions in COVID-19 patients should be prioritized, performed in separate procedure rooms if possible, and patients should be tested before interventions. Logistics, staff planning, and hygiene measures should be continuously optimized.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured workflows within interventional radiology in dealing with COVID-19 patients appear necessary to minimize infection risks and to guarantee the staff's work capability and health. In order to develop concepts for the handling of COVID-19 patients and to be prepared for potential upcoming waves of infections, recommendations of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and (inter-)national professional societies are helpful.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Postgraduate Training of Doctors in the United Kingdom: A Narrative Review

The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to healthcare systems globally. The delivery of medical education was consequently impacted as a result of this. In order to move past the pandemic, we must identify the gaps in postgraduate education. This literature review examines studies focusing on postgraduate training in the United Kingdom (UK) and attempts to bring together the issues that have been highlighted in these studies and the impact that this has had on trainees. It is important for the providers of healthcare education to have an understanding of the impacts of this disruption in order to maintain the quality of postgraduate medical education. Health Education England, along with the Royal Colleges, has published a report that sets a framework on how these issues can be addressed, with some of these changes starting to be implemented in 2022.

A national survey investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on core and higher breast radiology training in the UK

AIM

To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on core and higher breast radiology training in the UK from the perspective of trainees and new consultants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey comprising 25 questions was distributed to UK radiology trainees via the regional Junior Radiologists Forum representatives under the auspices of the British Society of Breast Radiology (BSBR).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine eligible responses were received representing all UK training regions. Fifty-five per cent of respondents completing either a core or higher breast rotation felt that the pandemic had a negative effect on their breast training. There was an overall reduction in exposure to the key breast imaging methods when rotations took place during the pandemic. Completing a core breast rotation during the pandemic was less likely to attract trainees to higher breast training. Three out of four breast radiology consultants in their first year after receiving their Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) felt the pandemic reduced their preparedness for becoming consultants. Positive outcomes included the increased use of online educational resources and remote multidisciplinary meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

As well as having a negative impact on breast radiology training overall, the pandemic has had a detrimental effect on attracting trainees to breast radiology as a future career. It is of key importance that trainees have a positive core breast rotation as this experience appears central to many trainees' decisions to pursue higher breast training. Increased use of online learning resources has also been positively received and is a valuable approach to learning that can be maintained in the longer term.

Formación online en Radiología en tiempos de COVID

La pandemia por COVID-19 ha alterado de forma significativa la metodología que tradicionalmente se ha empleado para la enseñanza de la Radiología en pregrado, posgrado y formación continuada. La necesidad de continuar con la formación en Radiología bajo una situación de distanciamiento físico ha provocado el uso masivo de metodología online y aquí es donde Internet se ha constituido en una solución para mitigar el problema. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar una serie de recursos útiles de acceso gratuito que comparten la filosofía #FOAMRad para la formación online en Radiología en estos tiempos de COVID.

Anatomical variants identified on chest computed tomography of 1000+ COVID-19 patients from an open-access dataset

Chest computed tomography (CT) has been the preferred imaging modality during the pandemic owing to its sensitivity in detecting COVID‐19 infections. Recently, a large number of COVID‐19 imaging datasets have been deposited in public databases, leading to rapid advances in COVID‐19 research. However, the application of these datasets beyond COVID‐19‐related research has been little explored. The authors believe that they could be used in anatomical research to elucidate the link between anatomy and disease and to study disease‐related alterations to normal anatomy. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the prevalence of six well‐known anatomical variants in the thorax using open‐access CT images obtained from over 1000 Iranian COVID‐19 patients aged between 6 and 89 years (60.9% male and 39.1% female). In brief, we found that the azygos lobe, tracheal bronchus, and cardiac bronchus were present in 0.8%, 0.2%, and 0% of the patients, respectively. Variations of the sternum, including sternal foramen, episternal ossicles, and sternalis muscle, were observed in 9.6%, 2.9%, and 1.5%, respectively. We believe anatomists could benefit from using open‐access datasets as raw materials for research because these datasets are freely accessible and are abundant, though further research is needed to evaluate the uses of other datasets from different body regions and imaging modalities. Radiologists should also be aware of these common anatomical variants when examining lung CTs, especially since the use of this imaging modality has increased during the pandemic.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Radiology Resident Education: Where Do We Go From Here?

The Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a dramatic shift in radiology resident education. Primarily, physical distancing prompted a general transition to virtual learning. Common changes made by radiology residency programs included virtual rounds and readouts, the use of simulation technology, and case-based learning which utilized pedagogical approaches such as the flipped classroom for teaching residents. Virtual learning appears to be a suitable alternative to traditional, in-person learning, and may have a place post-pandemic as part of a blended curriculum with in-person and virtual components. The extent of disruption to radiology resident education varied based on the local impact of COVID-19 and the prevalence of redeployment, as did residents’ mental health and wellbeing. Accessibility of mental health resources for residents was highlighted as an issue that programs need to address during these difficult times. Moreover, the pandemic resulted in unavoidable reductions in procedural exposure which programs mitigated through the use of simulation technologies and virtual learning resources. Professional development activities such as mentorship and career planning were also dramatically impacted by the pandemic and remains a challenge that programs need to consider moving forward post-pandemic. The purpose of this review is to outline the changes made to radiology resident education as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest what changes may be worthwhile to continue.