1
|
Giachello M, Leporatti L, Levaggi R, Montefiori M. The illness trap: The impact of disability benefits on willingness to receive HCV treatment. ECONOMICS AND HUMAN BIOLOGY 2024; 52:101352. [PMID: 38278057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Health care is assumed to be a primary good, implying that patients should always demand or accept treatments that may enhance their life expectancy and quality of life, especially if the risks associated with the treatment are low. We argue that, especially in countries with a well-developed welfare state, treating an invalidating condition may lead to opportunity costs in terms of reduced disability allowances that may represent a barrier to treatment for low-income individuals. We test this hypothesis by applying a recursive bivariate probit approach to population data from an ad hoc administrative database for Liguria (an Italian administrative region). The dataset includes data for more than 8 thousand people affected by hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection between 2013 and 2020. After the discovery of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in 2014, HCV eradication may now be possible. However, despite the national and international efforts, several patients diagnosed with HCV choose not to undergo drug therapy despite the adverse consequences for their personal health and relevant costs to the national health system. We show that five years after the implementation of the new drugs, approximately 41 % of the diagnosed population in Liguria remains untreated. This percentage increases to 64 % within the subgroup entitled to disability benefits and characterized by lower income levels. The "illness trap" effect is more substantial for older people but also low-income patients. Moreover, we find that this effect is higher in patients with an intermediate range of comorbidities; indeed, these patients are at a higher risk of losing economic benefits if they recover from HCV. These results suggest the need for healthcare policies addressing this distorting effect when designing benefit programs and granting financial benefits to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Giachello
- Department of Economics (DIEC), Centro APHEC, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5, Genova, GE 16126, Italy
| | - Lucia Leporatti
- Department of Economics (DIEC), Centro APHEC, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5, Genova, GE 16126, Italy.
| | - Rosella Levaggi
- Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, via S. Faustino 74/B, Brescia, BS 25122, Italy
| | - Marcello Montefiori
- Department of Economics (DIEC), Centro APHEC, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5, Genova, GE 16126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marton G, Monzani D, Vergani L, Pizzoli SFM, Pravettoni G. How to Measure Propensity to Take Risks in the Italian Context: The Italian Validation of the Risk Propensity Scale. Psychol Rep 2023; 126:1003-1017. [PMID: 34879777 DOI: 10.1177/00332941211054777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Risk propensity is a multifaced construct that influences many aspects of life, such as decision making. In the present study, the psychometric characteristics of the Risk Propensity Scale (RPS) have been explored for the first time in an Italian sample. The RPS is a 7 item self-report questionnaire measuring people's tendency to take risks. The English RPS has been translated following the forward-backwards translation method, and it was filled out by 199 participants. Since its dimensionality has never been explored before, its factor structure has been analysed with exploratory factor analysis that confirmed the one-factor structure of the questionnaire and the retention of all the items. The Italian version of the RPS has high internal consistency (Cronbach alphas .78), and almost all the items were positively and significantly correlated. The convergent and discriminant validity, analysed by considering the associations with decision-making styles and an implicit measure of risk propensity, were satisfactory. Overall, the Italian version of the RPS is a valid and quick questionnaire useful to measure propensity to take risks in the Italian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marton
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Monzani
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Vergani
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pettini G, Sanchini V, Pat-Horenczyk R, Sousa B, Masiero M, Marzorati C, Galimberti VE, Munzone E, Mattson J, Vehmanen L, Utriainen M, Roziner I, Lemos R, Frasquilho D, Cardoso F, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Kolokotroni E, Stamatakos G, Leskelä RL, Haavisto I, Salonen J, Richter R, Karademas E, Poikonen-Saksela P, Mazzocco K. Predicting Effective Adaptation to Breast Cancer to Help Women BOUNCE Back: Protocol for a Multicenter Clinical Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e34564. [PMID: 36222801 PMCID: PMC9607923 DOI: 10.2196/34564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the continued progress of medicine, dealing with breast cancer is becoming a major socioeconomic challenge, particularly due to its increasing incidence. The ability to better manage and adapt to the entire care process depends not only on the type of cancer but also on the patient’s sociodemographic and psychological characteristics as well as on the social environment in which a person lives and interacts. Therefore, it is important to understand which factors may contribute to successful adaptation to breast cancer. To our knowledge, no studies have been performed on the combination effect of multiple psychological, biological, and functional variables in predicting the patient’s ability to bounce back from a stressful life event, such as a breast cancer diagnosis. Here we describe the study protocol of a multicenter clinical study entitled “Predicting Effective Adaptation to Breast Cancer to Help Women to BOUNCE Back” or, in short, BOUNCE. Objective The aim of the study is to build a quantitative mathematical model of factors associated with the capacity for optimal adjustment to cancer and to study resilience through the cancer continuum in a population of patients with breast cancer. Methods A total of 660 women with breast cancer will be recruited from five European cancer centers in Italy, Finland, Israel, and Portugal. Biomedical and psychosocial variables will be collected using the Noona Healthcare platform. Psychosocial, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables will be measured every 3 months, starting from presurgery assessment (ie, baseline) to 18 months after surgery. Temporal data mining, time-series prediction, sequence classification methods, clustering time-series data, and temporal association rules will be used to develop the predictive model. Results The recruitment process stared in January 2019 and ended in November 2021. Preliminary results have been published in a scientific journal and are available for consultation on the BOUNCE project website. Data analysis and dissemination of the study results will be performed in 2022. Conclusions This study will develop a predictive model that is able to describe individual resilience and identify different resilience trajectories along the care process. The results will allow the implementation of tailored interventions according to patients’ needs, supported by eHealth technologies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05095675; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05095675 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34564
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Pettini
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Virginia Sanchini
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruth Pat-Horenczyk
- Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Berta Sousa
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marianna Masiero
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Munzone
- Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Johanna Mattson
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena Vehmanen
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Meri Utriainen
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ilan Roziner
- Department of Communication Disorders, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Raquel Lemos
- Champalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.,ISPA, Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Diana Frasquilho
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Albino J Oliveira-Maia
- Champalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, NMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Eleni Kolokotroni
- In Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, Athens, Greece.,School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Athens, Greece.,National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Stamatakos
- In Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, Athens, Greece.,School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Athens, Greece.,National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | - Evangelos Karademas
- Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.,Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Paula Poikonen-Saksela
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hlubocky FJ, Sher TG, Cella D, Wroblewski KE, Peppercorn J, Daugherty CK. Anxiety Shapes Expectations of Therapeutic Benefit in Phase I Trials for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Spousal Caregivers. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e101-e110. [PMID: 33567241 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced cancer patients (ACP) hope to receive significant therapeutic benefit from phase I trials despite terminal disease and presumed symptom burdens. We examined associations between symptom burdens and expectations of therapeutic benefit for ACP and spousal caregivers (SC) during phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective cohort of ACP-SC enrolled in phase I trials was assessed at baseline and one month using symptom burden measures evaluating depression, state-trait anxiety, quality of life, global health, post-traumatic coping, and marital adjustment. Interviews evaluated expectations of benefit. RESULTS Fifty-two phase I ACP and 52 SC (N = 104) were separately assessed and interviewed at baseline and one month. Total population demographics included the following: median age 61 years (28-78), 50% male, 100% married, 90% White, and 46% ≥ college education. At T1, ACP reported symptoms of mild state anxiety, mild trait anxiety, poor global health, and quality of life. SC reported moderate state and mild trait anxiety and good global health with little disability at baseline. State anxiety was a significant predictor of ACP expectations for phase I producing the following therapeutic benefits: stabilization (P = .01), shrinkage (P < .01), and remission (P = .04). Regression analyses also revealed negative associations between SC expectation for stabilization and SC anxiety: state (P = .01) and trait (P = .02). ACP quality of life was also negatively associated with SC expectations for stabilization (P = .02) and shrinkage (P = .01). CONCLUSION Anxiety, both state and trait, impacts couples' beliefs regarding the likelihood of therapeutic benefit from phase I trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fay J Hlubocky
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Tamara G Sher
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL
| | - David Cella
- Departments of Medical Social Sciences, Psychiatry Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Jeffery Peppercorn
- Division of Medicine, Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Dana Farber Partners, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher K Daugherty
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Busacchio D, Mazzocco K, Radice D, Summers PE, Pricolo P, Pravettoni G, Petralia G. Value Attribution in the Decision to Use of Whole Body MRI for Early Cancer Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11060972. [PMID: 34071199 PMCID: PMC8227751 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the main factors that asymptomatic individuals considered when deciding to undergo self-referred Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) for early cancer diagnosis and the subjective values attributed to each mentioned factor in a Decision tree analysis. Personal characteristics such as risk perception and personality were investigated as possible factors affecting value attribution. Seventy-four volunteers (mean age 56.4; male = 47) filled a simplified decision tree by expressing the expected factors and related subjective values associated with two screening options for early cancer diagnosis (standard procedures vs. WB-MRI+standard procedures) while waiting for a WB-MRI examination. Questionnaires on risk perception and personality traits were also administered. Expected factors were summarized in 5 clusters: diagnostic certainty, psychological well-being, safety, test validity and time/cost. Test validity and time/cost were evaluated as potential losses in both procedures. Diagnostic Certainty and safety were evaluated as losses in standard screening, and as an advantage when considering WB-MRI+standard screening. Forty-five percent of participants considered WB-MRI+standard screening as beneficial for their psychological well-being. Finally, personal absolute and comparative risk to get cancer was associated with a positive value attribution to WB-MRI (p < 0.05). Our results showed the addition of WB-MRI to be generally considered a good option to increase individuals’ perceptions of diagnostic certainty and the safety of the exam, and to increase psychological well-being. The positive value of such a screening option increased with the individual’s cancer risk perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derna Busacchio
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (K.M.); (G.P.)
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (P.E.S.); (P.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0257489207
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (K.M.); (G.P.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Davide Radice
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Paul E. Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (P.E.S.); (P.P.)
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (P.E.S.); (P.P.)
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (K.M.); (G.P.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marzorati C, Mazzocco K, Monzani D, Pavan F, Casiraghi M, Spaggiari L, Monturano M, Pravettoni G. One-Year Quality of Life Trends in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients After Lobectomy. Front Psychol 2020; 11:534428. [PMID: 33362618 PMCID: PMC7758417 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.534428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Quality of Life (QoL) is an important predictor of patient's recovery and survival in lung cancer patients. The aim of the present study is to identify 1-year trends of lung cancer patients' QoL after robot-assisted or traditional lobectomy and investigate whether clinical (e.g., pre-surgery QoL, type of surgery, and perioperative complications) and sociodemographic variables (e.g., age) may predict these trends. Methods: An Italian sample of 176 lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire—Core 30 (QLQ-C30) at the pre-hospitalization (t0), 30 days (t1), 4 months (t2), 8 months (t3), and 12 months (t4) after surgery. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, perioperative complications, and type of surgery) were also collected. The individual change over time of the 15 dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the effects of pre-surgery scores of QoL dimensions, type of surgery, perioperative complications, and age on patients' QoL after surgery were studied with the individual growth curve (IGC) models. Results: Patients had a good recovery after lobectomy: functioning subscales improved over time, while most of the symptoms became less severe over the care process. Perioperative complications, type of surgery, pre-surgery status, and age significantly affected these trends, thus becoming predictors of patients' QoL. Conclusion: This study highlights different 1-year trends of lung cancer patients' QoL. The measurement of pre- and post-surgery QoL and its clinical and sociodemographic covariables would be necessary to better investigate patients' care process and implement personalized medicine in lung cancer hospital divisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Monzani
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Pavan
- Patient Safety & Risk Management Service, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Casiraghi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Monturano
- Patient Safety & Risk Management Service, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Savioni L, Triberti S. Cognitive Biases in Chronic Illness and Their Impact on Patients' Commitment. Front Psychol 2020; 11:579455. [PMID: 33192894 PMCID: PMC7655771 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Savioni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Triberti
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garrett SB, Matthews TM, Abramson CM, Koenig CJ, Hlubocky FJ, Daugherty CK, Munster PN, Dohan D. Before Consent: Qualitative Analysis of Deliberations of Patients With Advanced Cancer About Early-Phase Clinical Trials. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e56-e63. [PMID: 31603726 PMCID: PMC6993554 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with advanced cancer and oncologists deliberate about early-phase (EP) trials as they consider whether to pursue EP trial enrollment. We have limited information about those deliberations and how they may facilitate or impede trial initiation. This study describes these deliberations and their relationship to trial initiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS We collected longitudinal, ethnographic data on deliberations of patients with advanced cancer at two academic medical centers. We used constant comparative and framework analyses to characterize the deliberative process and its relationship to trial initiation. RESULTS Of 96 patients with advanced cancer, 26% initiated EP enrollment and 19% joined a trial. Constant comparative analysis revealed two foci of deliberation. Setting the stage focused on patient and physician support for EP trial involvement, including patients' interest in research and oncologists' awareness of trials and assessment of patient fit. Securing a seat focused on eligibility for and entrance to a specific trial and involved trial availability, treatment history, disease progression, and enrollment timing. Patients enrolled in a trial only when both stages could be successfully navigated. CONCLUSION Ethnographic data revealed two foci of deliberation about EP trial enrollment among patients with advanced cancer. Physician support played a consequential role in both stages, but enrollment also reflected factors beyond the control of any specific individual. Insights from this study, combined with other recent studies of trial enrollment, advance our understanding of the complex process of EP trial accrual and may help identify strategies to improve rates of participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Dohan
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mazzocco K, Masiero M, Carriero MC, Pravettoni G. The role of emotions in cancer patients' decision-making. Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13:914. [PMID: 31123497 PMCID: PMC6467455 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the attempt to make decisions based on evidence, doctors still have to consider patients' choices which often involve other factors. In particular, emotions seem to influence the way that options and the surrounding information are interpreted and used. OBJECTIVE The objective of the present review is to provide a brief overview of research on decision making and cancer with a specific focus on the role of emotions. METHOD Thirty-nine studies were identified and analysed. Most of the studies investigated anxiety and fear. Worry was the other psychological factor that, together with anxiety, played a crucial role in cancer-related decision-making. RESULTS The roles of fear, anxiety and worry were described for detection behaviour, diagnosis, choice about prevention and curative treatments and help-seeking behaviour. Results were inconsistent among the studies. Results stressed that cognitive appraisal and emotional arousal (emotion's intensity level) interact in shaping the decision. Moderate levels of anxiety and worry improved decision-making, while low and high levels tended to have no effect or a hindering effect on decision making. Moderating factors played an under-investigated role. CONCLUSIONS Decision making is a complex non-linear process that is affected by several factors, such as, for example, personal knowledge, past experiences, individual differences and certainly emotions. Research studies should investigate further potential moderators of the effect of emotions on cancer-related choice. Big data and machine learning could be a good opportunity to test the interaction between a large amount of factors that is not feasible in traditional research. New technologies such as eHealth and virtual reality can offer support for the regulation of emotions and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ketti Mazzocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Masiero
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Carriero
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gorini A, Vistalli MG, Tremoli E. Physicians, be careful with self-exclusion of depressed and anxious patients from clinical trials! Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 26:219-220. [DOI: 10.1177/2047487318796582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Gorini
- Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Emato-Oncologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Patients with cancer may report neuropsychiatric abnormalities including cognitive impairment, behavioral disturbances, and psychiatric disorders that potentially worsen their quality of life, reduce their treatment response, and aggravate their overall prognosis. Neuropsychiatric disturbances have a different pathophysiology, including immuno-inflammatory and neuroendocrine mechanisms, as a consequence of oncologic treatments (chemo- and radio-therapy). Among clinicians involved in the management of such patients, psychiatrists need to pay particular attention in recognizing behavioral disturbances that arise in oncologic patients, and determining those that may be effectively treated with psychotropic medications, psychotherapeutic interventions, and an integration of them. Through the contribution of different clinicians actively involved in the management of oncological patients, the present review is ultimately aimed at updating psychiatrists in relation to the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the onset of cognitive, affective, and behavioral syndromes in these patients, along with epidemiologic and clinical considerations and therapeutic perspectives.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gorini A, Mazzocco K, Triberti S, Sebri V, Savioni L, Pravettoni G. A P5 Approach to m-Health: Design Suggestions for Advanced Mobile Health Technology. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2066. [PMID: 30429810 PMCID: PMC6220651 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, technology has been developed as an important resource for health care management, especially in regard to chronic conditions. In the broad field of eHealth, mobile technology (mHealth) is increasingly used to empower patients not only in disease management but also in the achievement of positive experiences and experiential growth. mHealth tools are considered powerful because, unlike more traditional Internet-based tools, they allow patients to be continuously monitored and followed by their own mobile devices and to have continual access to resources (e.g., mobile apps or functions) supporting health care management activities. However, the literature has shown that, in many cases, such technology not accepted and/or adopted in the long term by its users. To address this issue, this article reviews the main factors influencing mHealth technology acceptance/adoption in health care. Finally, based on the main aspects emerging from the review, we propose an innovative approach to mHealth design and implementation, namely P5 mHealth. Relying on the P5 approach to medicine and health care, this approach provides design suggestions to address mHealth adoption issues already at the initial stages of development of the technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Gorini
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Triberti
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Sebri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Savioni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chiappa A, Andreoni B, Dionigi R, Spaggiari L, Foschi D, Polvani G, Orecchia R, Fazio N, Pravettoni G, Cossu ML, Galetta D, Venturino M, Ferrari C, Macone L, Crosta C, Bonanni B, Biffi R. A rationale multidisciplinary approach for treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: Accurate review of management and perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 132:161-168. [PMID: 30447922 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of the esophagus and of gastroesophageal junction can be cured, even if with lacking cure rate. Different approaches have been developed, mostly when carcinoma has loco-regional pattern. Multimodality therapy showed a survival rate superior than 10% if compared to a single approach. This is a systematic review, carried to assess the following matters: Which therapeutic opportunities are available? Who could benefit of them? Which adverse reactions could possibly verify? How can physicians definitely choose the proper strategy? Which is the role of surgery? We mean to give either General Practitioner or specialists clear and efficient updates about current treatment of this tumour, starting from physical examination. Four eminent guidelines were consulted for our study: Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, NCCN, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre and Esmo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Chiappa
- Unit of Innovative Techniques in Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Renzo Dionigi
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Foschi
- Department of Surgery, "Luigi Sacco" Hospital, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Polvani
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, "Monzino" Cardiologic Institute, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Unit of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Unit of Psycho-Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Cossu
- Division of General Surgery II, University Hospital of Sassari, Department of Clinical and Trial Medicine, University of Sassari, Italy
| | - Domenico Galetta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Venturino
- Division of Anaesthesiology European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Ferrari
- Unit of Innovative Techniques in Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Macone
- Unit of Innovative Techniques in Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiano Crosta
- Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Biffi
- Division of Digestive Tract Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pravettoni G, Cutica I, Righetti S, Mazzocco K. Decisions and the involvement of cancer patient survivors: a moral imperative. J Healthc Leadersh 2016; 8:121-125. [PMID: 29355188 PMCID: PMC5741003 DOI: 10.2147/jhl.s115434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to review the experiences of direct involvement in patient survivorship for treatment and research. Methods This is a narrative-focused review of the following two recent experiences of patient involvement: the Chordoma Foundation and the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation. Results These two examples represent concrete experiences that patients have built to favor a real involvement in the care and treatment of tumors. These experiences are profoundly modifying how cancer research is conducted and draw attention to the psychosocial dimensions of health care. Conclusion These examples represent the new scenario in which modern medicine faces completely new challenges, copes with new needs, and cooperates with new health care professionals. Implications Involving patients in a new perspective raises practical and ethical challenges for organizations to work together, for health providers to be professionally skilled and for the government to promote safeguarding policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutica
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oliveri S, Howard HC, Renzi C, Hansson MG, Pravettoni G. Anxiety delivered direct-to-consumer: are we asking the right questions about the impacts of DTC genetic testing? J Med Genet 2016; 53:798-799. [PMID: 27647845 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes IRIDe, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Heidi C Howard
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Mats G Hansson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes IRIDe, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|