Correlation between PD-L1 expression and outcome of NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents: A meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;101:75-85. [PMID: 26969107 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.007]

Low pre-immunotherapy forced vital capacity is associated with poor outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy regardless of prior treatment history

Background

Many patients with lung cancer have underlying chronic lung diseases. We assume that baseline lung functions might also affect the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immunotherapy.

Objectives

We aimed to assess the impact of pretreatment clinical parameters, including lung function measures such as forced vital capacity (FVC), on the prognosis of patients with NSCLC following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy.

Design

Retrospective multicenter study.

Methods

Study subjects were consecutively selected from a multicenter cohort of patients with NSCLC who were undergoing immunotherapy. Patients were selected regardless of their initial cancer stage and prior treatment. The primary outcome was immunotherapy-related overall survival (iOS), defined as the duration from the initiation of immunotherapy to the time patients were censored. Spirometry values were acquired before bronchodilator application and were performed within the year before the first ICI treatment.

Results

We selected 289 patients for evaluation. The median iOS was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.5-14.3). Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tested by SP263, was <1% in 20.9%, 1%-49% in 44.3%, and ⩾50% in 32.6% of the patients. ICI was used most often as second-line treatment (70.2%), followed by first line (13.1%), and third line (11.4%). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median iOS of the low FVC group was significantly shorter than that in the preserved FVC group (6.10 (95% CI, 4.45-7.76) months vs 14.40 (95% CI, 10.61-18.34) months, p < 0.001)). A Cox regression analysis for iOS showed that age, poor performance status, PD-L1 expression measured by SP263, stage at diagnosis, and FVC (% predicted) were independent predictive factors. When we replaced FVC (%) in the multivariable analysis with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%), diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco; %), or DLco (absolute), each of the pulmonary function factors showed a significant association with iOS.

Conclusion

Pre-immunotherapy FVC (%) predicted immunotherapy-related outcomes in NSCLC patients, regardless of initial stage at diagnosis and prior treatment modalities.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of frontline immunotherapy combinations in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis highlighting the value of PD-L1 expression positivity scores

Introduction

The systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) consolidate all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to initial immunotherapy treatments for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our goal is to thoroughly assess the effectiveness and safety of various immunotherapy methods, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with advanced ESCC positive for PD-L1.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, covering all records from their inception until January 22, 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted patients with advanced ESCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy or chemotherapy, limiting the study selection to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively. The study upholds the values of openness, originality, and dependability, as evidenced by its enrollment in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024504992).

Results

Our analysis encompasses 7 RCTs, totaling 4688 patients, and evaluates 8 distinct immunotherapy combinations. In advanced ESCC patients irrespective of PD-L1 expression, both sintilimab-chemotherapy and toripalimab-chemotherapy regimens demonstrated comparable OS benefits (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.64-1.33). The most pronounced PFS advantages were seen with sintilimab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy as compared to standard chemotherapy (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.58). Notably, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.59-1.16) and nivolumab-ipilimumab (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.17) demonstrated significant safety profiles over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis based on PD-L1 expression revealed nivolumab-chemotherapy to yield the highest OS benefit (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.79) in ESCC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Furthermore, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.67) exhibited superior PFS benefits. Among patients with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.78) emerged as the most efficacious in improving OS, while serplulimab-chemotherapy (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.34-0.68) was associated with the longest PFS benefit.

Conclusion

The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy appears to significantly enhance survival outcomes in patients with advanced ESCC compared to chemotherapy alone. Sintilimab-chemotherapy is potentially the optimal regimen for patients without PD-L1 expression. In contrast, nivolumab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy are likely to offer the best OS and PFS benefits, respectively, in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Among those with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy is projected to provide the greatest OS advantage, whereas serplulimab-chemotherapy is anticipated to offer the most prolonged PFS benefit. Since most of the patients in this study originated from Asia, the above findings are more applicable to the Asian population.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024504992.

Durvalumab supplementation for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab supplementation may have some potential in improving the efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of durvalumab supplementation on efficacy for NSCLC.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of durvalumab supplementation on efficacy in patients with NSCLC. Overall survival and progression-free survival were included for this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for NSCLC, durvalumab supplementation showed significantly improved survival rate (odd ratio [OR] = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31 to 2.06; P < 0.0001), overall survival ( hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.87; P = 0.0003), progression-free survival rate (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.78 to 3.01; P < 0.00001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.95; P = 0.02), and had the capability to reduce the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab supplementation is effective to improve the efficacy for NSCLC.

Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 pharmDx assays to test programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab, one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, has been approved as an adjuvant treatment following resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with 1% or more programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved SP263 as a companion diagnostic assay for adjuvant treatment with atezolizumab; however, in clinical practice, the 22C3 assay is most commonly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, our study aimed to compare two PD-L1 assays, SP263 and 22C3, to evaluate whether 22C3 could replace SP263 when deciding whether to administer adjuvant atezolizumab.

METHODS

We retrospectively and prospectively analyzed 98 patients who underwent surgical resection at Kanagawa Cancer Center (Japan). An immunohistochemistry assay was performed for all the cases with both SP263 and 22C3. We statistically analyzed the concordance of PD-L1 expression between SP263 and 22C3 assays.

RESULTS

The concordance between the two assays using Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.670 (95% CI: 0.522-0.818) at the 1% cutoff and κ = 0.796 (95% CI: 0.639-0.954) at the 50% cutoff. The Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.874 (p < 0.01) indicated high concordance. PD-L1 expression with 22C3 resulted slightly higher than that with SP263.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a high concordance of PD-L1 expression with the SP263 and 22C3 assays. Further studies examining the therapeutic effects of adjuvant atezolizumab are required.

Prognostic impact of clinical factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50

Introduction

The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching.

Results

Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group.

Conclusions

ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.

Model-based meta-analysis of non-small cell lung cancer with standard of care PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy for early development decision making

Single-arm cohorts/trials are often used in early phase oncology programs to support preliminary clinical activity assessments for investigational products, administered alone or in combination with standard of care (SOC) agents. Benchmarking clinical activity of those combinations against other treatments, including SOC, requires indirect comparisons against external trials, which presents challenges including cross-study differences in trial populations/other factors. To facilitate such nonrandomized comparisons, we developed a comprehensive model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) framework to quantitatively adjust for factors related to efficacy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Data were derived from 15 published studies assessing key programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors pembrolizumab (n = 8) and nivolumab (n = 7), representing current SOC in mNSCLC. In the first stage, a mixed-effects logistic regression model for overall response rate (ORR) was developed accounting for effects of various population covariates on ORR. The ORR model results indicated an odds ratio (OR) of 1.02 for squamous versus non-squamous histology and OR of 1.20 for PD-ligand 1 tumor proportion score (TPS) per every 10% increase of TPS level. Next, a nonparametric mixed-effects model for overall survival (OS) was developed with ORR/other clinical covariates as input. Subsequently, MBMA simulations of relevant hypothetical scenarios involving single-arm trial design predicted OS hazard ratios as a function of ORR with matched patient characteristics. Findings from this MBMA and derived parameter estimates can be generally applied by the reader as a framework for interpreting efficacy data from early phase trials to support ORR-based go/no-go decisions and futility rules, illustrated through examples in this report.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without PD-L1 selection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding their relative efficacy and safety is lacking. This study compared the efficacy and safety of all currently available ICI treatments in patients with advanced NSCLC to identify optimal treatment regimens.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 8, 2022. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Forty RCTs involving 22,526 patients were selected, and a total of 26 treatment regimens were identified. Treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) provided superior OS compared with anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) treatment. ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) were superior to ICIs treatment alone, although the addition of PBC increased treatment toxicity. Cemiplimab ranked first for OS and lowest for any-grade AEs in advanced NSCLC patients without PD-L1 selection. Regarding grade ≥3 AEs, the toxicity of ICI monotherapy or ICI-ICI combination was consistently lower than that of the other treatments. For patients without PD-L1 selection, cemiplimab showed the best OS, pembrolizumab plus docetaxel (Pem-DXT) showed the best PFS, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC (Atezo-Beva-PBC) showed the best ORR. Pembrolizumab plus PBC and Atezo-Beva-PBC were the most likely optimal treatments for OS and PFS in patients with PD-L1 expression <1%, respectively. In patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%, treatment regimens containing anti-PD-1 provided superior OS benefits compared with those of anti-PD-L1 treatment, and sintilimab plus PBC (Sint-PBC) provided the best OS benefit; as for PFS, ICI plus PBC consistently showed greater PFS benefits than ICI or PBC alone. For patients with anti-PD-L1 expression of 1-49%, camrelizumab plus PBC provided the best benefit for OS and PFS among included treatment. Durvalumab-tremelimumab-PBC and Atezo-Beva-PBC respectively presented the highest OS and PFS for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. Moreover, cemiplimab and Atezo-Beva-PBC yielded the best OS and PFS benefits as first-line treatments for patients with advanced NSCLC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ICI plus PBC likely resulted in superior survival outcomes compared to ICI treatment alone, it did increase toxicity. Cemiplimab presented a well-balanced efficacy and safety profile in advanced NSCLC treatment. Our findings with the current ICIs comparisons will aid future trials for cancer immunotherapy.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ , CRD42022323879.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of PD-1 Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have emerged as the new standard of care for the second-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. There have been lots of research lately concerning the topic. A comprehensive assessment of the efficacy and safety profile between PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy is warranted. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to illustrate this issue. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched systematically until May 1, 2022. We extracted data on efficacy and safety and calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative ratios (RRs) with 95% CI using randomized-effect or fixed-effect models. A subgroup analysis was applied to explore the factors modifying the response to PD-1 inhibitors. Ultimately, a total of 5 studies involving 1970 patients were included in our meta-analysis. PD-1 inhibitors group could attain greater overall survival (OS) benefit (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66-0.81, P < 0.001) and nearly favorable progression-free survival (HR = 0.89, 0.76-1.04, P = 0.13). Treatment-related adverse events (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.91, P = 0.004) and level 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.32-0.49, P < 0.001) were significantly diminished in PD-1 inhibitors groups. Among all modifying factors, programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score was positively associated with the patient's OS. The analysis suggests that PD-1 inhibitors exhibited better survival outcomes and safety profiles than standard-of-care chemotherapy. High levels of programmed death ligand 1 combined positive scores were associated with an enhanced response to PD-1 immunotherapies concerning OS.

Serum cytokine analysis in a cohort of advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 inhibitors reveals predictive markers of CXCL12

Background

The circulating predictive factors for the outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain elusive. We aimed to assess the predictive value of circulating cytokines for outcomes.

Methods

Serum samples of 102 advanced-stage NSCLC patients who underwent immunotherapy were collected at baseline. The relative levels of 37 cytokines were detected. PD-L1 expression was also analyzed.

Results

Higher serum CXCL12 levels (top 33%) were a poor predictive biomarker for durable clinical benefit (DCB) (23.5% vs. 72.1%, p<0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (3.76 vs. 14.40 months; p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (12.20 vs. 44.84 months; p=0.008). Compared with PD-L1-negative patients, PD-L1-positive patients had a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (70.0% vs. 28.8%, p<0.001) and a prolonged mPFS (25.35 vs. 4.64 months, p=0.003) and tended to have an increased mOS (44.84 vs. 20.42 months, p=0.087). A signature comprising PD-L1<1% and the top 33% CXCL12 level was associated with the lowest ORR (27.3% vs. 73.7%, p<0.001) and DCB (27.3% vs. 73.7%, p<0.001) and the worst mPFS (2.44 vs. 25.35 months, p<0.001) and mOS (11.97 vs. 44.84 months, p=0.007). Area under the curve (AUC) analyses of PD-L1 expression, CXCL12 level and PD-L1 expression plus CXCL12 level to predict DCB or no durable benefit (NDB) showed AUC values of 0.680, 0.719 and 0.794, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that serum cytokine CXCL12 levels can predict the outcomes of patients with NSCLC receiving ICI. Moreover, the combination of CXCL12 levels and PD-L1 status can predict outcomes with a significantly improved discriminatory power.

Prognostic impact of LILRB4 expression on tumor-infiltrating cells in resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily B member 4 (LILRB4/ILT3) is an up-and-coming molecule that promotes immune evasion. We have previously reported that LILRB4 facilitates myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)-mediated tumor metastasis in mice. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the LILRB4 expression levels on tumor-infiltrating cells on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We immunohistochemically evaluated the LILRB4 expression levels of completely resected 239 NSCLC specimens. Whether the blocking of LILRB4 on human PBMC-derived CD33⁺ MDSCs inhibited the migration ability of lung cancer cells was also examined using transwell migration assay.

RESULTS

The LILRB4 ^high group, in which patients with a high LILRB4 expression level on tumor-infiltrating cells, showed a shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.013) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.0017) compared to the LILRB4 ^low group. Multivariate analyses revealed that a high LILRB4 expression was an independent factor for postoperative recurrence, poor OS and RFS. Even in the cohort background aligned by propensity score matching, OS (p = 0.023) and RFS (p = 0.0046) in the LILRB4 ^high group were shorter than in the LILRB4 ^low group. Some of the LILRB4 positive cells were positive for MDSC markers, CD33 and CD14. Transwell migration assay demonstrated that blocking LILRB4 significantly inhibited the migration of human lung cancer cells cocultured with CD33⁺ MDSCs.

CONCLUSION

Together, signals through LILRB4 on tumor-infiltrating cells, including MDSCs, play an essential role in promoting tumor evasion and cancer progression, impacting the recurrence and poor prognosis of patients with resected NSCLC.

Serum immune mediators as novel predictors of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with high tissue-PD-L1 expression

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) including anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies, have significantly changed the treatment outcomes with better overall survival, but only 15-40% of the patients respond to ICIs therapy. The search for predictive biomarkers of responses is warranted for better clinical outcomes. We aim here to identify pre-treatment soluble immune molecules as surrogate biomarkers for tissue PD-L1 (TPD-L1) status and as predictors of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in NSCLC patients. Sera from 31 metastatic NSCLC patients, eligible for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or combined chemoimmunotherapy, were collected prior to treatment. Analysis of soluble biomarkers with TPD-L1 status showed significant up/down regulation of the immune inhibitory checkpoint markers (sSiglec7, sSiglec9, sULBP4 and sPD-L2) in patients with higher TPD-L1 (TPD-L1 >50%) expression. Moreover, correlation analysis showed significant positive linear correlation of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) with higher TPD-L1 expression. Interestingly, only responders in the TPD-L1 >50% group showed significant down regulation of the immune inhibitory markers (sPD-L2, sTIMD4, sNectin2 and CEA). When responders vs. non-responders were compared, significant down regulation of other immune inhibitory biomarkers (sCD80, sTIMD4 and CEA) was recorded only in responding patients. In this, the optimal cut-off values of CD80 <91.7 pg/ml and CEA <1614 pg/ml were found to be significantly associated with better progression free survival (PFS). Indeed, multivariate analysis identified the cutoff-value of CEA <1614 pg/ml as an independent predictor of response in our patients. We identified here novel immune inhibitory/stimulatory soluble mediators as potential surrogate/predictive biomarkers for TPD-L1 status, treatment response and PFS in NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy improved clinical outcomes over bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in adenocarcinoma patients

PURPOSE

No definite conclusion has yet to be reached for the first-line treatment combined with chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients with negative driver genes. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of Beva+ChT and IO+ChT as first-line treatment for this population and investigated whether the statuses of BM, PD-L1 expression, and KRAS and TP53 mutations could influence the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data of patients with adenocarcinoma NSCLC who received first-line therapy were retrospectively collected and the patients were assigned to the IO+ChT and Beva+ChT groups. The disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between the two groups. The survival effects of BM, PD-L1 expression, and KRAS and TP53 mutations were also evaluated.

RESULTS

From April 2018 to October 2020, a total of 105 patients with first-line therapy were included in our analysis; 54 (51.4%) patients were included in the IO+ChT group and 51 (48.6%) patients were included in the Beva+ChT group. The results showed that OS (NR vs. 18.3 m, p = 0.011) and PFS (14.9 m vs. 6.3 m, p < 0.001) were superior in patients in the IO+ChT group than in patients in the Beva+ChT group. Further analysis revealed that the OS (median OS: NR vs. 14.7 months, p = 0.039) and PFS (median PFS: 18.5 vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.001) advantages of the IO+ChT group were also seen in the PD-L1 > 1% subgroup but were not seen in the PD-L1 < 1%, BM or KRAS mutation subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs combined with ChT improved clinical outcomes over Beva combined with ChT as first-line therapy for adenocarcinoma patients without driver gene alterations, especially in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%.

Towards an era of precise diagnosis and treatment: Role of novel molecular modification-based imaging and therapy for dedifferentiated thyroid cancer

Dedifferentiated thyroid cancer is the major cause of mortality in thyroid cancer and is difficult to treat. Hence, the essential molecular mechanisms involved in dedifferentiation should be thoroughly investigated. Several studies have explored the biomolecular modifications of dedifferentiated thyroid cancer such as DNA methylation, protein phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, and glycosylation and the new targets for radiological imaging and therapy in recent years. Novel radionuclide tracers and drugs have shown attractive potential in the early diagnosis and treatment of dedifferentiated thyroid cancer. We summarized the updated molecular mechanisms of dedifferentiation combined with early detection by molecular modification-based imaging to provide more accurate diagnosis and novel therapeutics in the management of dedifferentiated thyroid cancer.

The Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Chemotherapy for KRAS-Mutant or EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To assess and compare the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. chemotherapy for KRAS-mutant or EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancers.

Methods

Until February 19, 2022, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in NSCLC. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcome measures. The studies were conducted using the Cochrane methodology for meta-analyses, and all statistical analyses were made with Review Manager Software (RevMan version 5.4).

Results

Our meta-analysis included nine clinical trials including 5633 participants with NSCLC. Immune checkpoint drugs extended OS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.76) and PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.56) in patients with EGFR wild-type compared to chemotherapy alone, whereas programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy extended PFS in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.94). Meanwhile, immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. chemotherapy improved the OS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88) and PFS (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.66) of NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation. NSCLCs with KRAS G12C mutation had a much better PFS with ICIs than with chemotherapy (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.71).

Conclusion

This research revealed that individuals with EGFR wild-type NSCLC or KRAS mutation may benefit from PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors and that PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy seem to be more successful than chemotherapy alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Absolute eosinophil count predicts clinical outcomes and toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a paradigm shift in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We investigated absolute eosinophil count (AEC) as a predictor of clinical outcomes and toxicity in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AEC was retrospectively collected at baseline and during treatment from 158 advanced NSCLC patients treated with single agent anti-PD1/anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibody in first or subsequent line of therapy at Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence (Italy), between January 2016 to October 2020.

RESULTS

We found a significant association between high baseline AEC (≥130/μL) and better clinical outcomes. The response rates were 64.4% and 35.6% for patients with high and low AEC, respectively (p = 0.009). The high-AEC group showed a significantly longer PFS and OS than the low-AEC group (mPFS = 7.0 months, 95% CI 5.0-10.0 vs 2.5 months, 95% CI 2.0-4.0, p = 0.007 and mOS = 9.0 months, CI 95% 7.0-15.0 vs 5.5 months, 95% CI 4.0-8.0, p = 0.009, respectively). An increased risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was reported in the high-AEC group (p = 0.133). IrAEs resulted an independent prognostic factor for both better outcomes (mPFS = 8.0 months, 95% CI 7.0-12.0 vs 2.0 months, 95% CI 2.0-3.0, p<0.001; mOS = 13.0 months 95% CI 9.0-19.0 vs 4.0 months 95% CI 3.0-6-0, p<0.001) and response to ICIs (response rate = 33.8% vs 14.9%, disease control rate = 72.0% vs 32.1%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

High baseline AEC value (≥130/μL) is a predictive biomarker of clinical benefit and irAEs occurrence in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Bimodal liquid biopsy for cancer immunotherapy based on peptide engineering and nanoscale analysis

Despite its high potential, PD-L1 expressed by tumors has not been successfully utilized as a biomarker for estimating treatment responses to immunotherapy. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and tumor-derived exosomes that express PD-L1 can potentially be used as biomarkers; however, currently available assays lack clinically significant sensitivity and specificity. Here, a novel peptide-based capture surface is developed to effectively isolate PD-L1-expressing CTCs and exosomes from human blood. For the effective targeting of PD-L1, this study integrates peptide engineering strategies to enhance the binding strength and specificity of a β-hairpin peptide derived from PD-1 (pPD-1). Specifically, this study examines the effect of poly(ethylene glycol) spacers, the secondary peptide structure, and modification of peptide sequences (e.g., removal of biologically redundant amino acid residues) on capture efficiency. The optimized pPD-1 configuration captures PD-L1-expressing tumor cells and tumor-derived exosomes with 1.5-fold (p = 0.016) and 1.2-fold (p = 0.037) higher efficiencies, respectively, than their whole antibody counterpart (aPD-L1). This enhanced efficiency is translated into more clinically significant detection of CTCs (1.9-fold increase; p = 0.035) and exosomes (1.5-fold increase; p = 0.047) from patients' baseline samples, demonstrating stronger correlation with patients' treatment responses. Additionally, we confirmed that the clinical accuracy of our system can be further improved by co-analyzing the two biomarkers (bimodal CTC/exosome analysis). These data demonstrate that pPD-1-based capture is a promising approach for capturing PD-L1-expressing CTCs and exosomes, which can be used as a reliable biomarker for cancer immunotherapy.

BIPSE: A biomarker-based phase I/II design for immunotherapy trials with progression-free survival endpoint

A Bayesian biomarker-based phase I/II design (BIPSE) is presented for immunotherapy trials with a progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint. The objective is to identify the subgroup-specific optimal dose, defined as the dose with the best risk-benefit tradeoff in each biomarker subgroup. We jointly model the immune response, toxicity outcome, and PFS with information borrowing across subgroups. A plateau model is used to describe the marginal distribution of the immune response. Conditional on the immune response, we model toxicity using probit regression and model PFS using the mixture cure rate model. During the trial, based on the accumulating data, we continuously update model estimates and adaptively randomize patients to doses with high desirability within each subgroup. Simulation studies show that the BIPSE design has desirable operating characteristics in selecting the subgroup-specific optimal doses and allocating patients to those optimal doses, and outperforms conventional designs.

High programmed death ligand 1 expression in carcinomatous components predicts a poor prognosis in pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 46 patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma to better understand its clinical behavior and factors affecting the survival.

METHODS

Data of patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinomas resected in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The tumors were classified as carcinomatous or sarcomatous according to the tissue components. Pathological characteristics were evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. The percentages of tumor cells with membrane staining for PD-L1 in carcinomatous and sarcomatous components were determined.

RESULTS

We reviewed data of 46 patients (41 males, 5 females; median age 70.5 years old, range 36-83 years old). Most patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma expressed PD-L1 (80.4%), and the proportion of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was significantly higher in sarcomatous components than in carcinomatous components. In univariable analyses, high p-stage (III), necrosis on pathological findings, and high PD-L1 expression in carcinomatous components (≥ 50%) were poor prognostic factors for the overall survival. In multivariable analyses, high PD-L1 expression in carcinomatous components was significantly associated with a poor prognosis after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

High PD-L1 expression in carcinomatous components was significantly associated with a poor prognosis after surgery.

A Promising Treatment Strategy for Lung Cancer: A Combination of Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide despite advances in treatment. In the past few decades, radiotherapy has achieved outstanding technical advances and is being widely used as a definitive, prophylactic, or palliative treatment of patients with lung cancer. The anti-tumor effects of radiotherapy are considered to result in DNA damage in cancer cells. Moreover, recent evidence has demonstrated another advantage of radiotherapy: the induction of anti-tumor immune responses, which play an essential role in cancer control. In contrast, radiotherapy induces an immunosuppressive response. These conflicting reactions after radiotherapy suggest that maximizing immune response to radiotherapy by combining immunotherapy has potential to achieve more effective anti-tumor response than using each alone. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and their inhibitors, have attracted significant attention for overcoming the immunosuppressive conditions in patients with cancer. Therefore, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy is promising. Emerging preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the rationale for these combination strategies. In this review, we outlined evidence suggesting that combination of radiotherapy, including particle therapy using protons and carbon ions, with immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment could be a promising treatment strategy.

Gene expression signatures as candidate biomarkers of response to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancers

Although anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy has achieved clinical success in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), definitive predictive biomarkers remain to be elucidated. In this study, we performed whole-transcriptome sequencing of pretreatment tumor tissue samples and pretreatment and on-treatment whole blood samples (WB) samples obtained from a clinically annotated cohort of NSCLC patients (n = 40) treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) monotherapy. Using a single-sample gene set enrichment scoring method, we found that the tumors of responders with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD, n = 20) are inherently immunogenic to promote antitumor immunity, whereas those with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC, n = 18) have a less immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. These findings suggested that nivolumab may function as a molecular targeted agent in LUAD and as an immunomodulating agent in LUSC. In addition, our study explains why the reliability of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells as a predictive biomarker for the response to nivolumab monotherapy is quite different between LUAD and LUSC.

Durvalumab consolidation therapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer after concurrent chemoradiation: a China-based cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab in post-chemoradiotherapy patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

The study developed a five-health state Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation therapy in post-chemoradiotherapy patients based on the PACIFIC clinical trial. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty.

RESULTS

Durvalumab consolidation therapy provided an additional 1.22 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with an incremental cost of $24,397 compared to no consolidation therapy in unselected patients. Durvalumab consolidation therapy was cost-effective as it yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $20,000 per QALY gained at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $31,494 per QALY. In the patient subgroup with PD-L1-expressing tumors (≥1%), durvalumab was associated with an ICER of $33,058/QALY, resulting in a slight skewing away from the given cost-effectiveness threshold. The sensitivity analysis showed that ICERs were most sensitive to the cost of durvalumab, the cost of pembrolizumab, and the body weight of patients, regardless of PD-L1 expression selection.

CONCLUSION

Durvalumab consolidation therapy is likely to be cost-effective in China, which indicates that expensive immunotherapies can gain clinical benefits at a justifiable cost in developing countries as well.

A recombinant antibody fragment directed to the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (CRLF2) efficiently targets pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Antibody fragments are promising building blocks for developing targeted therapeutics, thus improving treatment efficacy while minimising off-target toxicity. Despite recent advances in targeted therapeutics, patients with Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL), a high-risk malignancy, lack specific and effective targeted treatments. Cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2) is overexpressed in 50% of Ph-like ALL cases, conferring the survival of leukemia blasts through activation of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway. Targeting such a vital cell-surface protein could result in potent anti-leukaemic efficacy and reduce the likelihood of relapse associated with antigen loss. Herein, we developed a novel single-chain variable fragment (scFv) against CRLF2 based on a monoclonal antibody raised against the recombinant extracellular domain of human TSLPRα chain. The scFv fragment demonstrated excellent binding affinity with CRLF2 protein in the nanomolar range. Cellular association studies in vitro using an inducible CRLF2 knockdown cell line and ex vivo using patient-derived xenografts revealed the selective association of the scFv with CRLF2. The fragment exhibited significant receptor antagonistic effects on STAT5 signalling, suggesting possible therapeutic implications in vivo. This study is the first to describe the potential use of a novel scFv for targeting Ph-like ALL.

Immune checkpoints and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Novel study progression, challenges and solutions

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer with the highest mortality rate worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for ~85% of the total number of lung cancer cases. In the past two decades, immunotherapy has become a more promising treatment method than traditional treatments (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy). Immunotherapy has been shown to improve the survival rate of patients and to have a superior effect when controlling lung cancer than traditional therapy. However, only a small number of patients can benefit from immunotherapy, and not all patients who qualify experience long-term benefits. In the clinic, the objective response rate of programmed cell death protein 1 treatment without the prior screening of patients is only 15-20%. Immunotherapy is associated with both opportunities and challenges for patients with NSCLC. The current challenges of immunotherapy include the lack of accurate biomarkers, inevitable resistance and insufficient understanding of immune checkpoints. In previous years, several methods for overcoming the challenges posed by immunotherapy have been proposed, but combination therapy is the most suitable choice. A large number of studies have shown that the combination of drugs can significantly improve their efficacy, compared with monotherapy, and that some therapeutic combinations have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of NSCLC. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a traditional medical practice in China that can play an important role in immunotherapy. Most agents used in TCM originate from plants, and have the advantages of low toxicity and multiple targets. In addition, TCM includes a unique class of drugs that can improve autoimmunity. Therefore, TCM may be a promising treatment method for all types of cancer.

Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of a 68Ga-Labeled Adnectin, 68Ga-BMS-986192, as a PET Agent for Imaging PD-L1 Expression

Blocking the interaction of the immune checkpoint molecule programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand, PD-L1, using specific antibodies has been a major breakthrough for immune oncology. Whole-body PD-L1 expression PET imaging may potentially allow for a better prediction of response to programmed cell death protein-1-targeted therapies. Imaging of PD-L1 expression is feasible by PET with the adnectin protein 18F-BMS-986192. However, radiofluorination of proteins such as BMS-986192 remains complex and labeling yields are low. The goal of this study was therefore the development and preclinical evaluation of a 68Ga-labeled adnectin protein (68Ga-BMS-986192) to facilitate clinical trials. Methods:68Ga labeling of DOTA-conjugated adnectin (BXA-206362) was performed in NaOAc-buffer at pH 5.5 (50°C, 15 min). In vitro stability in human serum at 37°C was analyzed using radio-thin layer chromatography and radio-high-performance liquid chromatography. PD-L1 binding assays were performed using the transduced PD-L1-expressing lymphoma cell line U-698-M and wild-type U-698-M cells as a negative control. Immunohistochemical staining studies, biodistribution studies, and small-animal PET studies of 68Ga-BMS-986192 were performed using PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative U-698-M-bearing NSG mice. Results:68Ga-BMS-986192 was obtained with quantitative radiochemical yields of more than 97% and with high radiochemical purity. In vitro stability in human serum was at least 95% after 4 h of incubation. High and specific binding of 68Ga-BMS-986192 to human PD-L1-expressing cancer cells was confirmed, which closely correlates with the respective PD-L1 expression level determined by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry staining. In vivo, 68Ga-BMS-986192 uptake was high at 1 h after injection in PD-L1-positive tumors (9.0 ± 2.1 percentage injected dose [%ID]/g) and kidneys (56.9 ± 9.2 %ID/g), with negligible uptake in other tissues. PD-L1-negative tumors demonstrated only background uptake of radioactivity (0.6 ± 0.1 %ID/g). Coinjection of an excess of unlabeled adnectin reduced tumor uptake of PD-L1 by more than 80%. Conclusion:68Ga-BMS-986192 enables easy radiosynthesis and shows excellent in vitro and in vivo PD-L1-targeting characteristics. The high tumor uptake combined with low background accumulation at early imaging time points demonstrates the feasibility of 68Ga-BMS-986192 for imaging of PD-L1 expression in tumors and is encouraging for further clinical applications of PD-L1 ligands.

Correlation between PD-L1 expression and MET gene amplification in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and no other actionable oncogenic driver

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are the most common type of lung cancer and can be classified according to the presence of mutually exclusive oncogenic drivers. The majority of NSCLC patients present a non-actionable oncogenic driver, and treatment resistance through the amplification of the METproto-oncogene (MET) or the expression of programmed cell death protein 1 ligand (PD-L1) is common. Herein, we investigated the relation between MET gene amplification and PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced NSCLC and no other actionable oncogenic driver (i.e., EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Our retrospective observational study analyzed data from 48 patients (78% men, median age 66 years) admitted to the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Spain, between July 2015 and February 2019. Patients presenting MET amplification showed a higher proportion of PD-L1 expression (93% vs. 39%; p < 0.001) and overexpression (64% vs. 27%; p = 0.020) than those with non-amplified MET. PD-L1 expression was not significantly different when analyzed by sex (p = 0.624), smoking history (p = 0.429), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (p = 0.597) Overall survival rates were not significantly affected by MET amplification (high and intermediate amplification vs low amplification and non-amplificated) (p = 0.252) nor PD-L1 expression (> vs =< 50%) (p = 0.893). In conclusion, a positive correlation was found between MET gene amplification and PD-L1 expression and highly expressed (above 50%) in patients with NSCLC and no other actionable oncogenic driver. It could be translated as new guided-treatment oportunities for these patients.

Molecular Mechanisms of Chemoresistance Induced by Cisplatin in NSCLC Cancer Therapy

Cancer cells utilise several mechanisms to increase their survival and progression as well as their resistance to anticancer therapy: deregulation of growth regulatory pathways by acquiring grow factor independence, immune system suppression, reducing the expression of antigens activating T lymphocyte cells (mimicry), induction of anti-apoptotic signals to counter the action of drugs, activation of several DNA repair mechanisms and driving the active efflux of drugs from the cell cytoplasm, and epigenetic regulation by microRNAs (miRNAs). Because it is commonly diagnosed late, lung cancer remains a major malignancy with a low five-year survival rate; when diagnosed, the cancer is often highly advanced, and the cancer cells may have acquired drug resistance. This review summarises the main mechanisms involved in cisplatin resistance and interactions between cisplatin-resistant cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment. It also analyses changes in the gene expression profile of cisplatin sensitive vs. cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cellular model using the GSE108214 Gene Expression Omnibus database. It describes a protein-protein interaction network that indicates highly dysregulated TP53, MDM2, and CDKN1A genes as they encode the top networking proteins that may be involved in cisplatin tolerance, these all being upregulated in cisplatin-resistant cells. Furthermore, it illustrates the multifactorial nature of cisplatin resistance by examining the diversity of dysregulated pathways present in cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cells based on KEGG pathway analysis.

Clinicopathological and prognostic values of PD-L1 expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 5368 patients

Several immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death 1 have successfully improved the prognosis of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with approval in certain countries. However, whether the expression of PD-L1 is associated with the degree of benefit is unclear yet and a unified standard of antibody and cut-off value of PD-L1 detection is also lacking. The current meta-analysis then aimed to explore the association between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features as well as prognosis in ESCC.A systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases was performed up to 30 March 2021. The correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features, as well as prognosis in ESCC, was estimated with the random-effects model.A total of 5368 patients from 31 retrospective studies were enrolled. The overexpression of PD-L1 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR 1.342, 95% CI 0.995 to 1.809, p=0.050) and distant metastasis (OR 1.516, 95% CI 1.001 to 2.294, p=0.050). The pooled HR showed that PD-L1 overexpression was significantly correlated with poor overall survival (OS) of patients with ESCC (HR 1.306, 95% CI 1.108 to 1.539, p<0.010) but not disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.180, 95% CI 0.937 to 1.487, p=0.160). Heterogeneity decreased significantly in subgroup analyses. The overexpression of PD-L1 was associated with poor DFS at the cut-off point of ≥1% (HR 1.642, 95% CI 1.367 to 1.973, p<0.010; I²=0%) and worse OS at the cut-off point of ≥10% (HR 1.575, 95% CI 1.175 to 2.111, p<0.010; I²=0%).The overexpression of PD-L1 was correlated with lymph node and distant metastasis as well as poor survival of ESCC.

Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in the tumor-infiltrating immune cells of patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Several studies have investigated the prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive expression in the tumor cells (TC) of patients with lung cancer. However, tumor-infiltrating immune cell (TIIC)-based PD-L1 expression and its prognostic value remain controversial. The present meta-analysis was performed on 11 studies comprising 2,685 patients, which were identified by a systematic search on the PubMed, PMC, Web of Science and Embase databases. The databases were searched for published articles up to October 30, 2020. The studies that evaluated overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) in the PD-L1 TIIC of patients with lung cancer were analyzed. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 16.0. The results demonstrated that PD-L1 expression in TIICs was not associated with OS [HR=0.98; confidence interval (CI)=0.73-1.33; P=0.53] and DFS (HR=1.05; CI=0.63-1.77; P=0.42) for all the cohort included in the study. However, subgroup analysis revealed that PD-L1 TIICs were associated with improved OS in lung squamous cell carcinoma (HR=0.76; CI=0.58-0.99; P=0.04), while poorer DFS was observed in lung adenocarcinoma (HR=1.30; CI=1.19-1.43; P=0.008) and at the >1% staining cutoff value (HR=1.56; CI=1.12-2.16; P=0.03). However, poor OS (P=0.21) and DFS (P=0.14) were observed in Asian populations, while DFS (P=0.07) for only-membrane staining was not statistically significant. The results of the present study suggested that adding PD-L1 TIICs to the existing diagnostic algorithm may help to guide patient selection for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Future large-scale studies are warranted for confirmation of the present findings.

Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials

Background

Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells with or without immune cells is widely reported in clinical trials of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Various cutpoints have been studied.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and conference proceedings up to December 2019 for randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We retrieved data on objective response rate (ORR), 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 2-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) in various PD-L1 subgroups. Results were pooled and analyzed based on different cutpoints, with nonrandomized comparisons made with pooled chemotherapy outcomes.

Results

A total of 9810 patients in 27 studies were included. In treatment-naïve patients, benefits with PD-1 blockade over chemotherapy were seen in ORR in patients having PD-L1 50% or greater, in 2-year OS for PD-L1 1% or greater, and in 1-year PFS, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS for unselected patients. First-line PD-1 blockade compared with chemotherapy demonstrated higher ORR, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 50% or greater; lower ORR, higher 2-year PFS, and similar 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 1%-49%; and lower ORR, similar 1-year PFS, and lower 2-year OS if PD-L1 was less than 1%. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade demonstrated similar or superior outcomes to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

Conclusions

PD-L1 should guide the choice of PD-1 blockade vs chemotherapy in treatment-naïve patients. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade provides a favorable outcome profile to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

Atezolizumab with bevacizumab, paclitaxel and carboplatin was effective for patients with SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma

SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma (DTS) is a recently noted progressive thoracic malignancy. We recently experienced three cases of SMARCA4-DTS who were treated with atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, paclitaxel and carboplatin (ABCP) as the first-line therapy. Immunohistopathological analysis revealed absent expression of SMARCA4 in all cases. The tumor mutational burden was over 11/Mb and mutations in SMARCA4 and TP53 were detected in all three cases. Partial response to ABCP treatment was observed in all three cases, with a progression-free survival of approximately 6 months or longer and a continuous response of 1 year or longer in one case. The first-line ABCP treatment demonstrated durable efficacy in SMARCA4-DTS regardless of the degree of PD-L1 expression.

Immune subgroup analysis for non-small cell lung cancer may be a good choice for evaluating therapeutic efficacy and prognosis

Due to its effectiveness, cancer immunotherapy has attracted widespread attention from clinicians and scientific researchers. Numerous studies have proven that effective stratification of cancer patients would promote the personalized application of immunotherapy. Therefore, we used the transcriptome data of nearly 1,000 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to construct a new immune subgroup. We found that the new immune subgroup, named cluster 2, was a mixture of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and showed poor overall survival, which was further verified in the independent validation set. Immune infiltration correlation analysis showed that the Mast cell type and its status subdivisions had a predictive effect on the prognosis of NSCLC, especially in LUAD. Phenotypic analysis suggested that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was positively correlated with immunosuppression, supporting the correlation between tumor phenotype and immune background. Although immune subtypes failed to significantly distinguish the progression-free survival (PFS) of immunotherapy patients, they showed the expected trend; the sample size needs to be further expanded for verification. In addition, some results indicated that the two cancer types, LUAD and LUSC, might require independent analyses.

Precision Medicine: A New Paradigm in Therapeutics

A key goal of clinical care is to treat patients as individuals and to approach therapeutics in such a way that it has optimal efficacy and minimal toxicity. With swift technological advances, such as genomic sequencing and molecular targeted drug exploitation, the concept of precision medicine has been robustly promoted in recent years. Precision medicine endeavors to demarcate diseases using multiple data sources from genomics to digital health metrics in order to facilitate an individualized yet "evidence-based" decision regarding diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. In this way, therapeutics can be centered toward patients based on their molecular presentation rather than grouping them into broad categories with a "one size fits all" approach. This review article is aimed to provide a broad overview of the advent and emergence of precision medicine in view of its current implications.

Prognostic Implications of Pan-Cancer CMTM6 Expression and Its Relationship with the Immune Microenvironment

CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain-containing 6 (CMTM6) reportedly stabilizes programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and enhances the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, correlations between CMTM6 expression and the immune microenvironment and its prognostic value remain unknown in a variety of tumors. CMTM6 expression data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 33 cancer types classified into high and low expression subgroups according to the median CMTM6 expression value. Pan-cancer analysis of CMTM6 protein expression in 20 tumor types was performed using a cohort from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA). PD-L1 protein expression data were obtained from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA) for 32 cancer types. Frequencies of CMTM6 copy number alterations and mutations were analyzed using cBioPortal. MANTIS was employed to estimate microsatellite instability in the TCGA cohort. CIBERSORT and the ESTIMATE algorithm were applied to estimate the relative fractions of infiltrating immune cell types and immune scores, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was performed to assess the pan-cancer prognostic value of CMTM6.CMTM6 is heterogeneously expressed in diverse cancers. Further, the results revealed low CMTM6 mutation frequencies in multiple cancers. Among them, CMTM6 mutation frequency was the highest in uterine cancer. Additionally, CMTM6 expression was related to PD-L1 protein expression in breast invasive carcinoma, cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma, sarcoma (SARC), stomach adenocarcinoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma. Increased CMTM6 expression may be associated with increased infiltration of neutrophils in some types of cancer. Finally, pan-cancer analysis indicated that CMTM6 expression was closely related to overall survival in adrenocortical carcinoma, GBM, acute myeloid leukemia, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, mesothelioma, SARC, thymoma, and uveal melanoma. Taken together, these findings highlight that CMTM6 plays an important role in the tumor immune microenvironment, and CMTM6 has been identified to have prognostic value in some types of cancers. Thus, CMTM6 is a potential target for cancer immunotherapy and effective prognostic biomarker.

Early changes in the circulating T cells are associated with clinical outcomes after PD-L1 blockade by durvalumab in advanced NSCLC patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are designed to activate exhausted tumor-reactive T cells thereby leading to tumor regression. Durvalumab, an ICI that binds to the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) molecule, is approved as a consolidation therapy for treatment of patients with stage III, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunophenotypic analysis of circulating immune cells revealed increases in circulating proliferating CD4 + and CD8 + T cells earlier after durvalumab treatment. To examine durvalumab’s mechanism of action and identify potential predictive biomarkers, we assessed the circulating T cells phenotypes and TCR genes of 71 NSCLC patients receiving durvalumab enrolled in a Phase I trial (NCT01693562, September 14, 2012). Next-generation sequencing of TCR repertoire was performed on these NSCLC patients’ peripheral blood samples at baseline and day 15. Though patients’ TCR repertoire diversity showed mixed responses to the treatment, patients exhibiting increased diversity on day 15 attained significantly longer overall survival (OS) (median OS was not reached vs 17.2 months for those with decreased diversity, p = 0.015). We applied network analysis to assess convergent T cell clonotypes indicative of an antigen-driven immune response. Patients with larger TCR clusters had improved OS (median OS was not reached vs 13.1 months for patients with smaller TCR clusters, p = 0.013). Early TCR repertoire diversification after durvalumab therapy for NSCLC may be predictive of increased survival and provides a mechanistic basis for durvalumab pharmacodynamic activity.

ROS1 Fusion Mediates Immunogenicity by Upregulation of PD-L1 After the Activation of ROS1-SHP2 Signaling Pathway in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The drug resistance of first-line crizotinib therapy for ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) fusion non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is inevitable. Whether the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is suitable for ROS 1 fusion NSCLCs or after the development of crizotinib resistance is still unknown. In this study, five different crizotinib resistant concentration cell lines (HCC78CR1-5) from primary sensitive HCC78 cells were cultured. Ba/F3 cells expressing crizotinib sensitive ROS1 fusion and crizotinib resistant ROS1-G2032R mutation were used to explore the relationship between ROS1 fusion, ROS1-G2032R mutation and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and the clinical potential of anti-PD-L1 ICI therapy. The signaling pathway net was compared between HCC78 and HCC78CR1-5 cells using RNA sequencing. Anti- PD-L1 ICI therapy was performed on mouse xenograft models with Ba/F3 ROS1 fusion or ROS1-G2032R mutation. HCC78CR1-5 showed more immunogenicity than HCC78 in immune-related pathways. The PD-L1 expression level was remarkably higher in HCC78CR1-5 with ROS1 fusion upregulation than HCC78 primary cell. Furthermore, the expression of PD-L1 was down-regulated by RNA interference with ROS1 siRNAs and up-regulated lower in Ba/F3 ROS1-G2032R resistant mutation than ROS1 fusion. Western blotting analysis showed the ROS1–SHP2 signaling pathway activation in HCC78CR1-5 cells, Ba/F3 ROS1 fusion and ROS1-G2032R resistant mutation. Mouse xenograft models with Ba/F3 ROS1 fusion showed more CD3+PD-1+ T cells both in blood and tissue, and more sensitivity than the cells with Ba/F3 ROS1-G2032R resistant mutation after anti-PD-L1 therapy. Our findings indicate that PD-L1 upregulation depends on ROS1 fusion more than ROS1-G2032R mutation. We share our insights of NSCLCs treatment management into the use of anti-PD-L1 ICI therapy in ROS1 fusion and not in ROS1-G2032R resistant mutation.

PD-L1 expression in the microenvironment and the response to checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), data from studies using checkpoint-inhibiting antibodies that target programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) demonstrated outstanding clinical activity. Translational investigations also suggested some correlations between therapeutic response and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue. We comprehensively summarize results that have evaluated PD-L1 expression in HNSCC. We discuss flaws and strength of current PD-1/PD-L1 detection, quantification methods and the evaluation of PD-L1 as a prognostic and theragnostic biomarker. Understanding tumor microenvironment may help understanding resistance to checkpoint inhibitors, designing clinical trials that can exploit drug combinations.

HSP90 Inhibition Enhances Cancer Immunotherapy by Modulating the Surface Expression of Multiple Immune Checkpoint Proteins

Cancer immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockade, have the potential to significantly impact treatments for diverse tumor types. At present, response failures and immune-related adverse events remain significant issues, which could be addressed using optimized combination therapies. Through a cell-based chemical screen of ∼200,000 compounds, we identified that HSP90 inhibitors robustly decrease PD-L1 surface expression, through a mechanism that appears to involve the regulation of master transcriptional regulators (i.e., STAT-3 and c-Myc). Interestingly, HSP90 inhibitors were found to also modulate the surface expression of additional checkpoint proteins (i.e., PD-L2). In the MC-38 syngeneic mouse tumor model, HSP90 inhibition was found to dramatically reduce PD-L1 surface expression on isolated live tumor cells and, consistent with recent findings, was found to increase the number of activated CD8+ T cells within the tumor microenvironment. These findings provide further rationale to explore HSP90 inhibitors as part of combination immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer.

Serum immune modulators during the first cycle of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Perforin as a biomarker

Background

Currently used biomarkers for immunotherapy are inadequate because they are only based on tumor properties. In view of microenvironment changes by tumors, host immunity should be considered, which may result in identifying more accurate and easily detectable biomarkers for daily clinical practice. Here, we assessed serum immune‐modulating factor levels for the response to anti‐PD‐1 antibodies during the first cycle in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Serum was collected from patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab at several time points during the first cycle. We applied the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and multiplex assays to measure the levels of immune modulators.

Results

A total of 40 patients treated with nivolumab and 26 patients treated with pembrolizumab were studied. By ELISA, serum perforin, but not granzyme B, was measured in all samples. By multiplex assay, 10 immune modulators, including granzyme B, were measured in some, but not all, samples. Serum baseline perforin levels were strongly associated with increased progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Sequential changes in perforin levels during the first cycle were weakly associated with the clinical outcome.

Conclusions

Serum baseline perforin levels may be used to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy.

Key points

To identify a useful predictive marker for anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy, using blood samples might be helpful.

Serum baseline perforin levels were closely associated with prognosis with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer.

Final overall survival and safety update for durvalumab in third- or later-line advanced NSCLC: The phase II ATLANTIC study

INTRODUCTION

In the phase II ATLANTIC study, durvalumab provided durable responses with acceptable tolerability in heavily pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC, across three independent patient cohorts defined by EGFR/ALK status and tumour PD-L1 expression. Preliminary overall survival (OS) data were encouraging. We now report final OS and updated safety data.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC with disease progression following ≥2 previous systemic regimens received durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate among patients with increased PD-L1 expression (defined as ≥25 % or ≥90 % of tumour cells [TCs], cohort-dependent). Secondary endpoints included OS and safety.

RESULTS

444 patients received durvalumab: 111 in Cohort 1 (EGFR+/ALK+), 265 in Cohort 2 (EGFR-/ALK-), and 68 in Cohort 3 (EGFR-/ALK-; TC ≥ 90 %). Median (95 % CI) OS was 13.3 months (6.3-24.5) in patients with EGFR+/ALK+ NSCLC with TC ≥ 25 %, 10.9 months (8.6-13.6) in patients with EGFR-/ALK- NSCLC with TC ≥ 25 %, and 13.2 months (5.9-not reached) in patients with EGFR-/ALK- NSCLC with TC ≥ 90 %. Median (95 % CI) OS was slightly shorter in patients with TC < 25 % (9.9 months [4.2-13.3] in patients with EGFR+/ALK+ NSCLC and 9.3 months [5.9-10.8] in those with EGFR-/ALK- NSCLC). Treatment-related adverse events of special interest occurred with similar incidences as reported previously.

CONCLUSIONS

After additional follow-up, final OS data remain encouraging across all cohorts, further supporting the clinical activity of durvalumab in patients with heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC, including those with EGFR+/ALK+ tumours. There were no new safety signals.

RAD51Bme Levels as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for PD-1 Blockade Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer (LC) cells frequently express high levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Although these levels grossly correlate with the likelihood of response to specific checkpoint inhibitors, the response prediction is rather imperfect, and more accurate predictive biomarkers are mandatory. We examined the methylation profile of RAD51B (RAD51B^me) as a candidate predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), correlating with patients’ outcome. PD-L1 immunoexpression and RAD51B^me levels were analysed in NSCLC samples obtained from patients not treated with anti-PD-1 (Untreated Cohort (#1)) and patients treated with PD-1 blockade (Treated Cohort (#2)). Of a total of 127 patients assessed, 58.3% depicted PD-L1 positivity (PD-L1⁺). RAD51B^me levels were significantly associated with PD-L1 immunoexpression. Patients with PD-1 blockade clinical benefit disclosed higher RAD51B^me levels (p = 0.0390) and significantly lower risk of disease progression (HR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15–0.88; p = 0.025). Combining RAD51B^me+ with PD-L1⁺ improved the sensitivity of the test to predict immunotherapy response. PD-L1⁺ was also associated with lower risk of death (HR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15–0.81; p = 0.014). Thus, RAD51B^me levels might be combined with validated predictive biomarker PD-L1 immunostaining to select patients who will most likely experience clinical benefit from PD-1 blockade. The predictive value of RAD51B^me should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies that target ctla-4, PD-1, or the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 have received approval in Canada and many parts of the world for the treatment of melanoma, renal cell cancer, urothelial cancer, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. However only a small proportion of patients derive long-term clinical benefit. Here, we describe the biomarkers associated with the complex relationship between tumour-related immune stimulus, T cell-mediated immune response, and immune modulation of the microenvironment that can help to predict improved patient outcomes.

Association Between Early Immune-related Adverse Events and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have described an association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and better outcomes in patients administered nivolumab for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the patients in previous studies were not stratified by potential predictive factors, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 status and treatment lines. Additionally, little is known of whether the timing and type of irAEs can inform the prediction of outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively investigated the association between irAEs and outcomes in the single-center cohort that included patients administered nivolumab in the second or later line of therapy. Subsequently, we confirmed these findings in a retrospective multicenter cohort that included patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 tumor proportion score of ≥ 50% who had received first-line pembrolizumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In the prospective cohort (n = 76), the median PFS was significantly longer for the patients experiencing irAEs within 2 weeks of beginning nivolumab compared with the PFS for those who did not (median, 5.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-8.6 months] vs. median, 2.0 months [95% CI, 1.9-2.5 months]; P = .046). The association was stronger with earlier (within 2 weeks) than with later (within 6 weeks) irAEs. In the retrospective cohort (n = 148), the median PFS was significantly longer for the patients with early irAEs (within 3 weeks) than for those without (median, not reached [95% CI, 5.9 months to not reached] vs. median, 6.9 months [95% CI, 4.2-9.7 months]; P = .04). Rash was common and a better predictor of outcomes in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our results have provided firmer evidence of the association between the occurrence of irAEs and outcomes and suggest that early irAEs (especially rash) might better predict outcomes.

Association between metastatic sites and first-line pembrolizumab treatment outcome for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

Associations between treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors and metastatic sites in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not well known. Therefore, this multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of metastatic sites after first-line pembrolizumab treatment for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. We retrospectively analyzed advanced NSCLC patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥50% who underwent first-line pembrolizumab therapy at 11 institutions between February 2017 and April 2018. Clinical data collected from medical records included metastatic sites at the time of pembrolizumab treatment. Treatment outcomes of pembrolizumab were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. In total, 213 patients were included in the study. The median age was 71 years (range 39-91 years). Of the 213 patients, 176 (83%) were men and 172 (81%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score of 0-1. The most common metastases were thoracic lymph node metastasis (77%), intrapulmonary metastasis (31%), bone metastasis (28%), and malignant pleural effusion (26%). On multivariate analysis, a poor ECOG-PS score (hazard ratio: 1.95, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.25-3.04; P = 0.003) and malignant pleural effusion (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.01-2.29; P = 0.043) were independent predictors of shorter progression-free survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab. For NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion, pembrolizumab monotherapy is not a suitable first-line treatment because of its insufficient effectiveness, even though their PD-L1 TPS was high.

Association of PD-L1 expression status with the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and overall survival in solid tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether PD-L1-positive patients derive more overall survival benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced solid tumours is unclear. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases from January 1, 1966 to March 1, 2019, to identify randomised controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab) that had available hazard ratios (HRs) for death according to PD-L1 status. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled overall survival (OS) HR and 95% CI among PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients. An interaction test was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity between the two estimates. A total of 24 randomised trials, involving 12,966 participants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. An OS benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was found in both PD-L1-positive patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.70) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91) even at the minimum cut-off value of 1%. Significant differences in the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients were noted at different cut-off values. Moreover, there was a positive dose-response relationship between PD-L1 positivity and OS benefit (HR for 1%, 0.58, [0.50, 0.67]; 5%, 0.52 [0.43, 0.64]; 10%, 0.50 [0.40, 0.63]). Subgroup analyses showed that these results were generally consistent, regardless of study design, line of treatment, treatment type, tumour type, PD-L1 staining cell type and median follow-up time. We demonstrated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved OS in both PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative patients compared to controls, but the magnitude of benefit was clinically PD-L1-dependent.

Fucosylated α1-acid glycoprotein as a biomarker to predict prognosis following tumor immunotherapy of patients with lung cancer

Immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoint molecules has provided remarkable clinical benefits in cancer patients but no clinically relevant biomarker for predicting treatment outcomes exists. Recently, we demonstrated that glycan structures of serum α₁-acid glycoprotein (AGP) changed dramatically in cancer patients and that α1,3fucosylated AGP (fAGP) levels increased along with disease progression and decreased responding to chemotherapy treatments. Here, the fAGP was analyzed in sera prospectively obtained from 39 patients with advanced lung cancer who underwent immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab. Twenty-three patients had significantly high fAGP levels above the cut-off value (H-fAGP) at one month after starting the treatment and 20 patients in this group, whose tumor sizes did not decrease, maintained high fAGP levels continuously and subsequently died. However, the other 16 patients, whose fAGP levels decreased or maintained below the cut-off value (L-fAGP), survived during a 2-year observation even though 5 patients in this group had no tumor shrinkage. Accordingly, the overall survival rate was found to significantly correlate with the fAGP level. Multivariate analyses revealed that the H-fAGP was an independent risk factor for cancer progression. Therefore, the fAGP level appeared to be a reliable biomarker for predicting clinical efficacy of immunotherapy with nivolumab.

Association Between Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Clinicopathological Characteristics, Structural Recurrence, and Biochemical Recurrence/Persistent Disease in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Background: Expression of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has been rarely reported. In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 positivity in MTC and analyzed its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics, structural recurrence (SR), and biochemical recurrence/persistent disease (BcR/BcPD). We also evaluated the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in patients developing distant or unresectable locoregional recurrence. Methods: In total, 201 consecutive MTC patients who underwent initial surgery in our institution from January 2006 to December 2015 were included. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining and was considered positive in case of a combined positive score ≥1. The association of PD-L1 positivity with clinicopathological characteristics, structural recurrence-free survival (SRFS), and BcR/BcPD was retrospectively investigated. Results: The median follow-up length of the entire cohort was 73 months. We observed positive PD-L1 staining in 29 (14.4%) patients who were more likely to have a larger tumor size (p = 0.002), lymph node metastases (p = 0.036), and advanced TNM staging (p = 0.019). The five-year SRFS of the PD-L1-negative and PD-L1-positive groups was 85.4% and 57.9% (p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PD-L1 positivity was independently associated with SR (hazard ratio = 2.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-4.77], p = 0.047). Furthermore, multivariate logistic analysis showed that PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with BcR/BcPD (odds ratio = 3.16 [CI 1.16-8.66], p = 0.025). During the study period, 20 patients developed distant or unresectable locoregional recurrence, among whom 8 (40%) were PD-L1 positive, which was much higher than in the entire MTC population. Conclusions: Using a large cohort of MTC patients, we demonstrate that PD-L1 positivity is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and is independently predictive of SR and BcR/BcPD. Furthermore, a higher rate of PD-L1 expression in patients with incurable recurrence has been observed. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathway may be a potential therapeutic strategy to treat advanced MTC.

The association of PD-L1 expression with the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and further estimated the value of PD-L1 expression in predicting the response from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy.

Methods

Clinical trial data were searched from electronic databases, which evaluated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and correlated with PD-L1 expression levels.

Results

Fifteen randomized-controlled trials involving 10,074 patients were identified. Comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy to chemotherapy, the pooled HR for overall survival (OS) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.85, P<0.00001). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients had longer OS at ≥1%, ≥5%, ≥10% and ≥50% PD-L1 expression levels. Patients with higher PD-L1 expression may get increased benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, patients with PD-L1 ≥50% had an objective response rate (ORR) improvement from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (RR =1.87, 95% CI: 1.27-2.75, P=0.001), but no ORR benefits were observed in patients with PD-L1 expression <1% (RR =0.82, 95% CI: 0.56-1.22, P=0.33) or 1-49% (RR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98, P=0.03). OS was significantly better in patients receiving second-or-third line treatments (P<0.00001) with PD-L1 ≥1%. The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors was similar to that of PD-L1 inhibitors, with no significant difference (P=0.63, I²=0%). Furthermore, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy had better OS (HR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.84, P=0.001) than chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analyses showed that patients benefited from the combined chemo-IO treatment in the first-line setting regardless of PD-L1 expression level.

Conclusions

PD-L1 expression may be a valuable predictor of the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in certain NSCLC patients. However, the combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy significantly improved survival regardless of the PD-L1 expression level in the first-line treatment of NSCLC.