GEORCC recommendations on target volumes in radiotherapy for Head Neck Cancer of Unkown Primary

[Cervical CUP Syndrome: Diagnosis and Therapy]

In CUP syndrome (CUP = cancer of unknown primary) there are 1 or more metastases of a primary tumor that cannot be localized despite extensive diagnostics. CUP syndrome accounts for 5% of all human malignancies, making it one of the 10 most common forms of cancer. In addition to inflammatory lymph node enlargement and benign changes such as cervical cysts, lymph node metastases are among the most common cervical masses. Cervical CUP syndrome is a histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastasis with an unknown primary tumor. In addition to anamnesis, clinical examination and histological confirmation, diagnostics include radiological imaging using PET-CT and panendoscopy with histological primary tumor search. Treatment options include surgical therapy with neck dissection and chemoradiotherapy.

Management of unknown primary head and neck cancer with radiation therapy in the era of human papillomavirus (HPV): No longer cutting down the tree to get an apple

PURPOSE

Given the central role that radiation has in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin, it is imperative to review how treatment paradigms have been refined and continue to evolve in the modern era.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A literature search of peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to identify works pertaining to the use of radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin presenting as cervical lymph node metastases. Articles published from January 2002 to January 2023 with full text available on PubMed and restricted to the English language and human subjects were included. The full bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed and irrelevant studies were removed.

RESULTS

While such breakthroughs as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, positron emission tomography, biomarker testing with immune-histochemistry, and minimally invasive surgical techniques such as transoral robotic surgery have fundamentally changed the approach to this disease in recent decades, controversies still exist with respect to the manner in which radiation is delivered. Although the incidence of head and neck unknown primary cancer is relatively low, questions regarding the necessity of comprehensive radiation using the age-old standard method of targeting the bilateral necks and entire pharyngeal axis to encompass all putative sites of mucosal disease persist.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective evidence is lacking, and the available studies have been complicated by such factors as the relatively limited sample sizes, as well as the variability in work-up, treatment, inclusion criteria, and follow-up. Regardless, advances in science and technology have ushered in more precise approaches with a high degree of customization, particularly given the increased proportion of patients presenting with human papillomavirus-related disease.

A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: An Unmet Clinical Need

Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) is defined as cervical lymph node metastases without a detectable primary tumor. The management of these patients presents a challenge to clinicians since guidelines in the diagnosis and treatment of HNCUP remain controversial. An accurate diagnostic workup is fundamental for the search for the hidden primary tumor to allow the best adequate treatment strategy. The purpose of this systematic review is to present the currently available data about the diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers for HNCUP. Systematic research in an electronic database was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and identified 704 articles, of which 23 studies were selected and included in the analysis. Fourteen studies investigated HNCUP diagnostic biomarkers and focused on the human papilloma virus (HPV) and the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) due to the strong associations with oropharyngeal cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer, respectively. HPV status was shown to possess prognostic value, correlating with longer disease-free survival and overall survival. HPV and EBV are the only available HNCUP biomarkers, and they are already used in clinical practice. A better characterization of the molecular profiling and the development of tissue-of-origin classifiers are necessary to improve the diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic management of patients with HNCUP.

Evaluation of risk-tailored individualized selection of radiation therapy target volume for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

PURPOSE

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled risk-tailored approach to elective mucosal and nodal clinical target volumes (CTVs) in treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). This study report outcomes following such approach.

METHODS

HNCUP patients treated with definitive IMRT between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed. Local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS) and grade ≥3 late toxicity (LT) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify OS predictors for entire cohort and cN2-3 subgroup.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were eligible: cN1 (7%), cN2a (14%), cN2b (46%), cN2c (14%) and cN3 (19%). Among 118 patients with known HPV status (by p16 staining), 81 (68%) were positive. IMRT target volume spared contralateral tonsil (55%), bilateral or contralateral sides of hypopharynx (72%), nasopharynx (72%), larynx (87%) and contralateral uninvolved neck (21%). Median follow-up was 5 years. Five-year LF, RF, DM, OS, and LT were 3%, 14%, 10%, 79%, and 7% respectively. Four patients developed mucosal recurrence: 3 within and 1 at the margin of the elective mucosal CTV. None of ipsilateral neck irradiation patients failed in the contralateral uninvolved neck. MVA identified cN2c-N3, HPV-negative status and older age as predictors for inferior OS. Within cN2-3 subgroup (n=189): cN2c-N3, HPV-negative status and older age predicted lower OS, while concurrent chemotherapy was associated with better OS.

CONCLUSION

Definitive IMRT with risk-adaptive radiation volume de-escalation for HNCUP resulted in high probability of tumor control with acceptable rate of late toxicity.

Comparative cohort study of volumetric modulated arc therapy for squamous cell cancer of unknown primary in the head and neck-Involved neck only versus mucosal irradiation

OBJECTIVES

Target volumes for irradiation remain ill-defined for squamous cell cancer of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUP). The aim of this study was to compare involved neck only (INO) radiotherapy (RT) with irradiating involved neck plus potential mucosal primary sites and contralateral neck (MUC) in patients diagnosed and treated with modern diagnostics and techniques.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with a diagnosis of SCCUP with unilateral neck disease were included.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were identified. All underwent FDG PET-CT. 47% of patients had HPV-positive SCC. 20 patients received RT to INO, 10 patients to MUC, all with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). A significantly lower dose for each organ at risk was delivered in INO-treated patients, with mean dose to contralateral parotid gland 57% less. The proportion of patients with late grade 2 or worse xerostomia was higher in MUC patients. The incidence of grade 2-3 mucositis (89% vs 45%) and grade 3 or worse dysphagia (50% vs 10%) was higher in MUC patients. Median follow-up was 31 months. No mucosal primaries emerged. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 74.7% for INO patients, 70% in the MUC group. Overall survival at 2 years was 79.7% in the INO group and 70% in the MUC patients.

CONCLUSION

INO radiotherapy for patients with SCCUP of the head and neck is a safe treatment strategy resulting in clinically significant lower RT doses to OARS. Acute and late toxicities are reduced without detriment to patient survival.

Evaluation of radiation treatment volumes for unknown primaries of the head and neck in the era of FDG PET

Objectives

Positron-emission tomography (PET) has improved identification of the primary tumor as well as occult nodal burden in cancer of the head and neck. Nevertheless, there are still patients where the primary tumor cannot be located. In these situations, the standard of care is comprehensive head and neck radiation therapy however it is unclear whether this is necessary. This study examines the effects of radiation treatment volume on outcomes among using data from two cancer centers in unknown primary carcinoma of the head and neck.

Methods

Patients received unilateral (n = 34), or bilateral radiation (n = 28). Patient factors such as age, gender, smoking history, and patterns of failure were compared using Mann Whitney U and Chi Square. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) trends were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Effect of treatment volume on survival was examined using multivariate cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the frequency of local (p = 0.32), regional (p = 0.50), or distant (p = 0.76) failures between unilateral and bilateral radiation therapy. By Kaplan-Meier estimates, OS (3-year OS bilateral = 71.67%, unilateral = 77.90%, p = 0.50) and DFS (3-year DFS bilateral = 77.92%, unilateral = 69.43%, p = 0.63) were similar between the two treatment approaches. Lastly, multivariate analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences in outcome by treatment volumes (OS: HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.31, 1.81, p = 0.51; DFS: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.24, 1.93, p = 0.47).

Conclusions

Unilateral radiation therapy compared with bilateral produced similar survival.

Failure patterns of cervical lymph nodes in metastases of unknown origin according to target volume

Purpose

This study was aim to evaluate the patterns of failure according to radiotherapy (RT) target volume for cervical lymph nodes in metastases of unknown primary origin in head and neck region (HNMUO).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-two patients with HNMUO between 1998 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed the clinical outcomes and primary site failure depending on the radiation target volume. The target volume was classified according to whether the potential head and neck mucosal sites were included and whether the neck node was treated involved side only or bilaterally.

Results

Potential mucosal site RT (mucosal RT) was done to 23 patients and 39 patients did not receive mucosal RT. Mucosal RT showed no significant effect on overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR). The location of primary site failure encountered during follow-up period was found to be unpredictable and 75% of patients with recurrence received successful salvage therapies. No significant differences in OS and LRR were found between patients treated to unilateral (n = 35) and bilateral neck irradiation (n = 21). Treatment of both necks resulted in significantly higher mucositis.

conclusions

We found no advantages in OS and LRR of patients with HNMUO when mucosal sites and bilateral neck node were included in the radiation target volume.

A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 2 (Radiation Oncology)

Background: The Head and Neck Cancer Working Group of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) has investigated the level of consensus (LOC) and discrepancy in everyday practice of diagnosis and treatment in head and neck cancer.

Materials and Methods: An online survey was iteratively generated with 10 Swiss university and teaching hospitals. LOC below 50% was defined as no agreement, while higher LOC were arbitrarily categorized as low (51–74%), moderate (75–84%), and high (≥85%).

Results: Any LOC was achieved in 62% of topics (n = 60). High, moderate, and low LOC were found in 18, 20, and 23%, respectively. Regarding Head and Neck Surgery, Radiation Oncology, Medical Oncology, and biomarkers, LOC was achieved in 50, 57, 83, and 43%, respectively.

Conclusions: Consensus on clinical topics is rather low for surgeons and radiation oncologists. The questions discussed might highlight discrepancies, stimulate standardization of practice, and prioritize topics for future clinical research.