Increased fatigability of external anal sphincter in inflammatory bowel disease: significance in fecal urgency and incontinence

Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Bowel urgency (BU), the sudden or immediate need for a bowel movement, is one of the most common and disruptive symptoms experienced by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Distinct from the separate symptom of increased stool frequency, BU has a substantial negative impact on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Among patients with UC, BU is one of the top reasons for treatment dissatisfaction and one of the symptoms patients most want improved. Patients may not discuss BU often due to embarrassment, and healthcare providers may not address the symptom adequately due to the lack of awareness of validated tools and/or knowledge of the importance of assessing BU. The mechanism of BU in UC is multifactorial and includes inflammatory changes in the rectum that may be linked to hypersensitivity and reduced compliance of the rectum. Responsive and reliable patient-reported outcome measures of BU are needed to provide evidence of treatment benefits in clinical trials and facilitate communication in clinical practice. This review discusses the pathophysiology and clinical importance of BU in UC and its impact on the quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Patient-reported outcome measures developed to assess the severity of BU in UC are discussed alongside overviews of treatment options and clinical guidelines. Implications for the future management of UC from the perspective of BU are also explored.

Anorectal Manometry in Patients With Fecal Incontinence After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Cohort Study

Background

Fecal incontinence commonly occurs in patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. There is a paucity of manometric data in pouch patients. We aimed to better define manometric parameters in pouch patients with fecal incontinence.

Methods

We compared clinical and manometric variables in ulcerative colitis patients with pouch and fecal incontinence to ulcerative colitis patients with pouch without fecal incontinence and to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Manometric data for the 3 cohorts were compared to established normative data. An independent-samples t-test was performed for continuous variables, and chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of incontinence in pouch patients (P < .05).

Results

Among 26 pouch patients with fecal incontinence (73% female), 26 pouch patients without fecal incontinence (35% female), and 84 patients with fecal incontinence without ulcerative colitis (68% female), there were no differences in anorectal pressures between patients with fecal incontinence. Lower pressures were observed in pouch patients with fecal incontinence compared to those without fecal incontinence. Resting pressure was similar between pouch patients with fecal incontinence and healthy controls (60.9 ± 36.1 mmHg vs. 66.9 ± 3.2 mmHg, P = .40). Female sex (P = .019) and defecatory disorders (P = .033) each independently predicted fecal incontinence in pouch patients.

Conclusions

Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have lower anorectal pressures compared to pouch patients without incontinence, though have similar pressures to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have similar resting pressures as healthy controls. Distinct manometric normative values for pouch patients are needed.

Anal sphincter fatigability in assessing anal incontinence: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing anal incontinence (AI) based on manometry results is challenging due to the variation of the normal values and overlap between patients with and without AI. This study aimed to perform a systematic review on the difference in sphincter fatigability between patients with and without AI.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies were included if they included adult patients and assessed anal sphincter fatigability between using manometry. The effect size was estimated as the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. A random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

The database searches identified 125 unique articles, and five additional articles were identified from the reference list of articles. One hundred thirteen were excluded through title and abstract review. Nine articles were included in the final analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the resting pressure between the two groups. Patients with AI had significantly lower squeeze pressure. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the fatigue rate. The FRI was significantly lower in patients with AI (SMD 1.636, p = 0.001). Approximately a third of the patients in one study were able to maintain a contraction for 20s without reducing pressure. There was significant heterogeneity in the studies. The data available were inadequate for more robust calculations.

CONCLUSIONS

Sphincter fatigability, measured by the Fatigability Rate Index, has good discriminating power for anal incontinence. A standardized protocol needs to be followed by future researchers. Graphical Abstract The analysis used six studies with 413 patients to compare Fatigue Rate Index between patients with AI and controls. All studies reported a lower FRI in patients with incontinence and the FRI was significantly lower in patients with AI (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.636, p= 0.001). Conflicting results were reported on the correlation between FRI and AI symptom scores.

Fecal Incontinence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence (FI) is frequently reported in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from the Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with IBD registry.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-seven patients had Crohn disease and 145 had ulcerative colitis. 14.2% of patients reported FI. FI was associated with active disease. FI was not associated with disease location, phenotype, or perianal involvement. Greater than 50 years of age or 15 years of disease increased the odds of FI and remission decreased the odds of FI.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research into the mechanism of FI in IBD is needed.

Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence is a disabling condition affecting up to 20% of women.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated fecal incontinence assessment in both inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients to propose a diagnostic approach for inflammatory bowel disease trials.

METHODS

We searched on Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library for all studies on adult inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients reporting data on fecal incontinence assessment from January 2009 to December 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 328 studies were included; 306 studies enrolled non-inflammatory bowel disease patients and 22 studies enrolled inflammatory bowel disease patients. In non-inflammatory bowel disease trials the most used tools were the Wexner score, fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire, Vaizey score and fecal incontinence severity index (in 187, 91, 62 and 33 studies). Anal manometry was adopted in 41.2% and endoanal ultrasonography in 34.0% of the studies. In 142 studies (46.4%) fecal incontinence evaluation was performed with a single instrument, while in 64 (20.9%) and 100 (32.7%) studies two or more instruments were used. In inflammatory bowel disease studies the Wexner score, Vaizey score and inflammatory bowel disease quality of life questionnaire were the most commonly adopted tools (in five (22.7%), five (22.7%) and four (18.2%) studies). Anal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography were performed in 45.4% and 18.2% of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on prior validation and experience, we propose to use the Wexner score as the first step for fecal incontinence assessment in inflammatory bowel disease trials. Anal manometry and/or endoanal ultrasonography should be taken into account in the case of positive questionnaires.

Targets for interventions for faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Prevalence of faecal incontinence is greater in patients with inflammatory bowel disease than in the general population. It is a major concern for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, even when disease is in remission. It is underreported and negatively affects quality of life. We explored the evidence on the associations of faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease and the effectiveness of interventions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Databases searched in October 2017: Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index and Scopus. Manual search of reference lists was also conducted. Four researchers independently screened references and extracted data.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the review (14 on associations, four on interventions). The presence of faecal incontinence was reported as 12.7-76% among 5924 participants, varying in definitions adopted and populations studied. Factors associated with faecal incontinence included disease activity, loose stool, female gender, childbirth, previous surgery, anal sphincter weakness or fatigability, anxiety and depression. The cross-sectional design of studies means causation cannot be inferred. Interventions included surgery (sphincter repair and sacral nerve stimulation) and tibial nerve stimulation which each improved faecal incontinence. However, the four intervention studies were small (34 participants in total) and uncontrolled.

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease associated with various sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors which could be targeted in future interventions. Future intervention studies with control groups, targeting likely underlying causes such as disease activity, loose stool, psychological factors and anal sphincter function, are needed.

Fecal Incontinence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Understanding of the prevalence, pathophysiology, and management of fecal incontinence (FI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients without an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is suboptimal. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence, pathophysiology, and management of primary FI in IBD patients without IPAA.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1966 through March 2017) for studies on the prevalence, physiology, or management of FI in IBD patients without IPAA. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence rates and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics, Cochran Q statistic, and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included. Six studies evaluated the prevalence of FI in 4671 IBD patients. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies, but the pooled prevalence of FI among case-control studies was homogeneous at 24% (95% CI 18%-30%, I2 = 50.6%, P = 0.16). FI was more common among IBD patients than non-IBD controls (OR = 7.73; 95% CI 6.26 to 9.84). Therapeutic options were poorly evaluated in uncontrolled studies. Surgery was effective in 70% of patients (7/10), sacral nerve stimulation was effective in 100% of patients (5/5), and 41.6% of patients (5/12) reported subjective improvement in FI with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

FI is prevalent in IBD patients without IPAA, and more common than non-IBD controls. Additional controlled studies are warranted to further identify effective therapeutic interventions for FI in IBD. 10.1093/ibd/izx109_video1izx109_Video_15760611117001.

Improvement of Refractory Ulcerative Proctitis With Sacral Nerve Stimulation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is recognized for its efficiency and safety for anal incontinence, preventing high morbidity. Evidence from the literature suggests extending SNS to diseases associated with problems of intestinal barrier permeability. The aim of this study was to highlight clinical evidence of the beneficial impact of SNS in a refractory proctitis case report.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A permanent SNS was performed successfully in a patient with proctitis after implantation of the neuromodulator. Despite immunosuppressive drugs, the patient was experiencing mucus and blood discharge, pain, and fecal incontinence. To relieve fecal incontinence, SNS was tested without modification of medications. Disease activity, endoscopic and histologic score, ex vivo barrier permeability, expression of inflammatory cytokines (transforming growth factor-β, tumor necrosis factor α, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-8), and junctional proteins (ZO-1, claudin-1, occludin) were assessed before and after SNS to observe the impact of SNS other than for incontinence.

RESULTS

After a 3-week period of temporary stimulation, the patient experienced significant improvement with a decrease in fecal incontinence and disease activity scores. Both endoscopic and histologic scores showed improvement. The rectal barrier permeability decreased with SNS, whereas junctional protein mRNA expression transiently increased. Clinical and histologic improvement was sustained over time. After 18 months of permanent stimulation, the patient remained improved by SNS.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates the relevance to explore further indications of SNS beyond fecal incontinence.

Faecal incontinence intervention study (FINS): self-management booklet information with or without nurse support to improve continence in people with inflammatory bowel disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease, comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a life-long currently incurable illness. It causes bouts of acute intestinal inflammation, in an unpredictable relapsing-remitting course, with bloody diarrhoea and extreme urgency to access a toilet. Faecal incontinence is a devastating social and hygiene problem, impacting heavily on quality of life and ability to work and socialise. Faecal incontinence affects 2-10 % of adults in the general population. People with inflammatory bowel disease have a high risk of incontinence with up to 74 % affected. No previous study has explored conservative interventions for these patients.

METHODS

This randomised controlled trial will recruit 186 participants to answer the research question: does implementation of the UK nationally recommended guidance approach to stepwise management of faecal incontinence improve bowel control and quality of life in people with inflammatory bowel disease? We have worked with people with inflammatory bowel disease to translate this guidance into a condition-specific information booklet on managing incontinence. We will randomise participants to receive the booklet, or the booklet plus up to four 30-minute sessions with an inflammatory bowel disease specialist nurse. To be eligible, patients must be in disease remission and report incontinence. The primary outcome measure at 6 months after randomisation is the St Mark's incontinence score. Other outcomes include quality of life, MY-MOP (generic tool: participants set two goals for intervention, grading goals at baseline and then re-scoring after intervention) and EQ-5D-5 L to enable calculation of quality-adjusted life years. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. Qualitative interviews will explore participant and health professionals' views on the interventions.

DISCUSSION

Few high-quality studies of conservative interventions in inflammatory bowel disease, and none for faecal incontinence, have been conducted. We have collaborated with patients to design this study. Blinding to this behavioural intervention is not possible, but our self-report outcome measures with a degree of objectivity. There is genuine equipoise between the booklet only and booklet plus nurse arms, and the study will determine if additional support from a nurse is a crucial element in implementing advice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinitrials.gov.uk: NCT02355834 (Date of registration: 12 December 2014). Protocol version: 4.0. 08.04.15.

Severity of fecal urgency and incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical, manometric and sonographic predictors

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence (FI) and urgency are prevalent symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It is unclear which factors determine their severity. We evaluated associations of clinical activity, anorectal motility, and endoanal sonography with FI severity in IBD.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive IBD patients and 14 healthy volunteers participated in a cross-sectional, tertiary-center study. Active disease was defined as Crohn's disease activity index ≥ 150 and as simple clinical colitis index > 2. We assessed anal pressures and fatigue rate index (FRI) of the external anal sphincter (EAS) by manometry, rectal compliance and sensitivity by balloon distension, and sphincter defects by endoanal ultrasound. Significant bivariate associations between these parameters and the fecal incontinence severity scale (FISS) were evaluated in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (47%) reported urgency, 13 of which (22%) reported FI. Defects of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and the EAS were diagnosed in 14 (24%) and 13 patients (22%), respectively. Patients had significantly lower rectal compliance and FRI compared with controls. FISS demonstrated significant bivariate associations with clinical disease activity (P = 0.0115), FRI (P = 0.0018), sonographic IAS and EAS defects (P < 0.0001 and 0.0059), rectal compliance (P = 0.0001), and volume at the threshold of a constant urge (Vurge, P = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, FISS was associated with clinical disease activity (P = 0.0325), FRI (P = 0.0367), Vurge (P = 0.0091), and sonographic IAS defect(s) (P = 0.0008). The derived model explained 62% of the variance in FISS (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical disease activity and manometric and sonographic anorectal parameters are associated with FI severity in IBD. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate their predictive value in continence outcomes.

Faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: associations and effect on quality of life

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

No previous study has reported on faecal incontinence (FI) amongst people with IBD. We aimed to determine the frequency and severity of FI in people with IBD, its association with known FI risk factors, and the effect on quality of life.

METHOD

We randomly sampled 10,000 members of a national Crohn's and Colitis organisation over 18years old. Demographic information, medical history, FI (ICIQ-B), urinary continence (ICIQ-UI), quality of life (IBD-Q) and free text responses about FI were collected. Current disease activity was reported using the Harvey Bradshaw Index for Crohn's Disease (CD), and the Walmsley Index for ulcerative colitis (UC). Data were managed using Excel, Stata and SPSS 18.

RESULTS

4827 responses were received: 3264 were complete and included (32.6% response). 2178 respondents were female (66.7%); mean age 50.26 yrs (range 19-92); CD 1543 (46.98%); UC 1599 (48.97%); other IBD 126 (3.85%); no diagnosis given 6 (0.18%). 74% (2391) of respondents reported FI (95% CI 72-75). Nine percent (299) reported regular FI. No association was found between FI and diagnosis. Significant associations were found in multivariable analysis between FI and age (p=0.005), gender (p<0.001), anal stretch (p=0.004), anal fistula surgery (p<0.001), colo-rectal surgery (p=<0.001), and urinary incontinence (p=<0.001), but not with vaginal delivery. Quality of life was significantly affected by FI (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Even if all non-respondents are continent, FI affects 24% of people with IBD. In our sample 74% reported FI, which can occur without active disease. There is a large currently unmet need for continence care in people with IBD.