1
|
Sui J, Lin Z, Azizpour S, Chen F, Gaur S, Keene K, Soleimani F, Bhowmick T, Rafique Z, Javanmard M. Clinical evaluation of a fully electronic microfluidic white blood cell analyzer. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296344. [PMID: 38236796 PMCID: PMC10796056 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The White Blood Cell (WBC) count is one of the key parameters signaling the health of the immune system. Abnormal WBC counts often signal a systemic insult to the body such as an underlying infection or an adverse side effect to medication. Typically, the blood collected is sent to a central lab for testing, and results come back within hours, which is often inconvenient and may delay time-sensitive diagnosis or treatment. Here, we present the CytoTracker, a fully electronic, microfluidic based instant WBC analyzer with the potential to be used at point-of-care. The CytoTracker is a lightweight, portable, affordable platform capable of quantifying WBCs within minutes using only 50 μl of blood (approximately one drop of blood). In this study, we clinically evaluated the accuracy and performance of CytoTracker in measuring WBC and granulocyte counts. A total of 210 adult patients were recruited in the study. We validated the CytoTracker against a standard benchtop analyzer (Horiba Point of Care Hematology Analyzer, ABX Micros 60). Linear dynamic ranges of 2.5 k/μl- 35 k/μl and 0.6 k/μl- 26 k/μl were achieved for total WBC count and granulocyte count with correlation coefficients of 0.97 and 0.98. In addition, we verified CytoTracker's capability of identifying abnormal blood counts with above 90% sensitivity and specificity. The promising results of this clinical validation study demonstrate the potential for the use of the CytoTracker as a reliable and accurate point-of-care WBC analyzer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianye Sui
- RizLab Health, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Zhongtian Lin
- RizLab Health, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Shahriar Azizpour
- RizLab Health, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Fei Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Sunanda Gaur
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Kelly Keene
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Farzad Soleimani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Tanaya Bhowmick
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Zubaid Rafique
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Mehdi Javanmard
- RizLab Health, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Lin T, Tang L, He L, He Y. MiRNA signatures in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Am J Cancer Res 2023; 13:5805-5824. [PMID: 38187072 PMCID: PMC10767356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a prevalent cancerous tumor that affects the head and neck region. Recent studies have provided compelling evidence indicating the significant involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the development and progression of NPC. This review aims to present a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding miRNA signatures in NPC, encompassing their expression patterns, molecular mechanisms, and potential therapeutic implications. Initially, the article outlines the aberrant expression of miRNAs in NPC and elucidates their roles in tumor initiation, invasion, and metastasis. Subsequently, the underlying molecular mechanisms of miRNA-mediated regulation of NPC-associated signaling pathways are discussed. Additionally, the review highlights the potential clinical applications of miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as their therapeutic potential in NPC treatment. In conclusion, this review underscores the critical involvement of miRNAs in NPC pathogenesis and underscores their promise as novel therapeutic targets for combating this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Chen
- School of Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ting Lin
- Hunan Provincial Engineering and Technological Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Diseases with Chinese Medicine and Protecting Visual Function, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha 410208, China
- Hunan Provincial Key Lab for The Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Diseases with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha 410208, China
| | - Le Tang
- School of Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha, Hunan, China
- Hunan Provincial Engineering and Technological Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Diseases with Chinese Medicine and Protecting Visual Function, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha 410208, China
| | - Lan He
- Hunan Provincial Engineering and Technological Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Diseases with Chinese Medicine and Protecting Visual Function, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha 410208, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yingchun He
- School of Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha, Hunan, China
- Hunan Provincial Engineering and Technological Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Diseases with Chinese Medicine and Protecting Visual Function, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha 410208, China
- Hunan Provincial Key Lab for The Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Diseases with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese MedicineChangsha 410208, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geisler J, Karihtala P, Tuxen M, Valachis A, Holm B. Current treatment landscape of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in the Nordics: a modified Delphi study. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1680-1688. [PMID: 37713138 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Delphi study aimed to assess current perspectives on hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative(HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) treatment strategies across the Nordics, and to establish where consensus exists across the Nordics on HR+/HER2- aBC treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS A modified, three-round Delphi method was followed. A steering committee was appointed for study coordination, panellist selection, and questionnaire development. The questionnaires covered relevant topics on HR+/HER2- aBC treatment: treatment patterns in different lines of therapy (first [1L], second [2L], and third [3L]), oligometastatic disease, de novo aBC, brain metastases, age as influential factor, visceral crisis, radiotherapy, diagnostics, and clinical guidelines. Both open and closed-ended questions were included. Consensus was defined as at least 70% agreement. RESULTS In total, 28 experienced BC oncologists participated in the study from all five Nordic countries. Overall, topics reaching consensus included: preferred treatment approach in 1L and 2L therapy, treatment of oligometastatic disease, visceral crisis, brain metastases, and age-related treatment considerations. No consensus was reached for 3L therapy and local treatment for primary tumour in de novo aBC. Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor was the treatment of choice for 1L and 2L therapy. Treatment patterns in clinical practice did not always follow recommendations in current Nordic guidelines, as seen in the case of recently approved treatments. DISCUSSION ET in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the preferred frontline treatment for HR+/HER2- aBC in the Nordics. The observed discrepancy between current guidelines and clinical practice could be due to differences in the reimbursement of novel treatments in the Nordics. Collaborative research efforts are warranted for topics that lack consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Geisler
- Department of Oncology, University of Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway
| | - Peeter Karihtala
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Malgorzata Tuxen
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Antonis Valachis
- Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Barbro Holm
- Department of Oncology, Novartis, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tornyi I, Árkosy P, Horváth I, Furka A. A new perspective on the proper timing of radiotherapy during CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in patients with "bone-only" metastatic breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2023; 29:1611369. [PMID: 37886029 PMCID: PMC10598277 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2023.1611369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
The vast majority of hormone positive and HER2 negative advanced breast cancers can be controlled well by endocrine therapy combined with the groundbreaking use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the metastatic first-line setting. Approximately 50%-60% of these patients have "bone-only" metastatic disease. In oligometastatic cases or if a certain number of uncontrolled lesions develop during the aforementioned therapy, ablative radiotherapy can be delivered or, in symptomatic cases, urgent irradiation is needed with palliative intent. To achieve the most effective results, parallel with good quality of life, the timing of radiotherapy must be determined precisely, taking into account that different cell cycles are involved during different treatment modalities; therefore, optimization of treatment schedules ensures longer and safer post-progression overall survival. The key question is whether the two treatment modalities are safe concurrently or whether they should be administered separately, and if so, what is the optimal sequence and why? This manuscript aims to answer this important question, with a focus on quality of life. Existing publications focus on safety and toxicity profiles, and efficacy is detailed only tangentially and minimally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Tornyi
- Department of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Peter Árkosy
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Ildikó Horváth
- Department of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Andrea Furka
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Health Care, Institute of Practical Methodology and Diagnostics, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoshimoto FH, de Sousa CFPM, Marta GN, Hanna SA. Integration of Postoperative Radiation Therapy with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitors. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1153-1159. [PMID: 37624551 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01444-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Sequential use of radiation therapy before cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors in women with early breast cancer seems reasonable and with a low toxicity rate. This study aimed to evaluate the possible interaction between RT and CDK inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for patients with positive hormone receptors and HER-2 negative, investigating toxicity and the treatment sequencing. RECENT FINDINGS CDK inhibitors have been studied in patients with localized breast cancer and can improve invasive disease-free survival outcomes. Regarding the time of RT, all trials used CDK inhibitors after the RT. Interruptions in the CDK inhibitors were performed in 27.1% in Pallas, 17.5% in Penelope-B, and 16.6% in Monarch-E trials due to adverse events. Data from the Natalee trial are still not reported. The main adverse event grade III was neutropenia, with good resolution of the symptoms over time. CDK inhibitors applied sequentially and after RT postoperative showed a low profile of acute toxicity and suitable oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Hayashida Yoshimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91, Oncology Center, São Paulo, 01308-050, Brazil.
| | | | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91, Oncology Center, São Paulo, 01308-050, Brazil
| | - Samir Abdallah Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91, Oncology Center, São Paulo, 01308-050, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Becherini C, Visani L, Caini S, Bhattacharya IS, Kirby AM, Nader Marta G, Morgan G, Salvestrini V, Coles CE, Cortes J, Curigliano G, de Azambuja E, Harbeck N, Isacke CM, Kaidar-Person O, Marangoni E, Offersen B, Rugo HS, Morandi A, Lambertini M, Poortmans P, Livi L, Meattini I. Safety profile of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 119:102586. [PMID: 37336117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, improving survival outcomes compared to endocrine therapy alone. Abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy, have demonstrated significant benefits in invasive disease-free survival for high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients. Each CDK4/6i-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-exhibits distinct toxicity profiles. Radiation therapy (RT) can be delivered with a palliative or ablative intent, particularly using stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. However, pivotal randomized trials lack information on concomitant CDK4/6i and RT, and existing preclinical and clinical data on the potential combined toxicities are limited and conflicting. As part of a broader effort to establish international consensus recommendations for integrating RT and targeted agents in breast cancer treatment, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of combining CDK4/6i with palliative and ablative RT in both metastatic and early breast cancer settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | | | - Anna M Kirby
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Gilberto Morgan
- Division of Medical and Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group & Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato - Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Clare M Isacke
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproductive (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabetta Marangoni
- Laboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Morandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beddok A, Cottu P, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. [Radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the management of breast cancer: A review]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:447-454. [PMID: 37173174 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to review the current knowledge regarding combinations of the most commonly used targeted therapies or those under development for the management of breast cancer with radiation therapy. Several studies have shown that the combination of radiation therapy and tamoxifen increased the risk of radiation-induced lung toxicity; therefore, the two modalities are generally not given concurrently. The combination of HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and radiation therapy appeared to be safe. However, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) should not be given concomitantly with brain radiation therapy because this combination may increase the risk of brain radionecrosis. The combination of radiation therapy with other new targeted therapies such as new selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERDs), lapatinib, cell cycle inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage repair seems feasible but has been mainly evaluated on retrospective or prospective studies with small numbers of patients. Moreover, there is a great heterogeneity between these studies regarding the dose and fractionation used in radiotherapy, the dosage of systemic treatments and the sequence of treatments used. Therefore, the combination of these new molecules with radiotherapy should be proposed sparingly, under close monitoring, pending the ongoing prospective studies cited in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Beddok
- Laboratoire d'imagerie translationnelle en oncologie (Lito), Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm, 91898 Orsay, France; Département de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Centre de protonthérapie, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France.
| | - P Cottu
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Fourquet
- Département de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Département de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Camps Maléa A, Hennequin C, Rivera S. [Targeted systemic treatments and locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: Can we expect a benefit from the potentiation of local treatment?]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:535-541. [PMID: 37558607 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the first most common cancer worldwide, and radiation therapy has a major role to play in locoregional adjuvant treatment. In recent years, we have seen the emergence of adjuvant targeted systemic therapies improving the prognosis of patients at high risk of recurrence. Practices concerning combinations of targeted therapies and locoregional radiation therapy for non-metastatic breast cancers often remain heterogeneous due to the low level of evidence and lack of validated recommendations. This literature review covers immunotherapy, CDK 4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors and anti-Her2 therapies. Combining these targeted systemic therapies with radiation therapy could potentiate local treatment. The optimal therapeutic sequence and fractionation for maximum synergistic effect remain to be defined. However, while efficacy may be enhanced, radiosensitization of healthy tissue may also lead to increased toxicity. It appears possible to continue immunotherapy, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, TDM-1 or lapatinib during locoregional breast and lymph node irradiation. PARP inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors are still to be suspended, due to the lack of data in the adjuvant setting and their short half-life, which does not necessitate prolonged discontinuation. As with the new antibody-drug conjugates, prospective data are needed in conjunction with adjuvant radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Camps Maléa
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - C Hennequin
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75475 Paris, France
| | - S Rivera
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yan B, Ramadan S, Jerzak KJ, Louie AV, Donovan E. The Effectiveness and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in the Treatment of Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6976-6985. [PMID: 37504365 PMCID: PMC10378468 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a technique to treat oligoprogressive sites among patients with breast cancer who are otherwise doing well on systemic therapy. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of SBRT in the setting of oligoprogressive breast cancer. A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database. Studies regarding SBRT and oligoprogressive breast cancer were included. Key outcomes of interest were toxicity, local control, progression, and overall survival. From 863 references, five retrospective single-center cohort studies were identified. All studies included patients with both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease; 112 patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer were identified across these studies. Patient age ranged from 22 to 84, with a median of 55 years of age. Most patients had hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease. SBRT doses varied from 24 to 60 Gy in 1-10 fractions based on the location/size of the lesion. Forty toxicity events were reported, of which the majority (n = 25, 62.5%) were grade 1-2 events. Among 15 patients who received SBRT concurrently with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, 37.5% of patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicities. Progression-free and overall survival ranged from 17 to 57% and 62 to 91%, respectively. There are limited data on the role of SBRT in oligoprogressive breast cancer, and prospective evaluation of this strategy is awaited to inform its safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernie Yan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Sherif Ramadan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Katarzyna J Jerzak
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Elysia Donovan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beddok A, Porte B, Cottu P, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. [Biological, preclinical and clinical aspects of the association between radiation therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:240-248. [PMID: 37080859 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Several clinical studies have shown that CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve survival in patients with metastatic or locally advanced HR-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer (BC). The aim of this review was to synthesize the biological, preclinical and clinical aspects of the treatment of BC with CDK4/6i, with a focus on the combination of CDK4/6i and radiotherapy. The DNA damage induced after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation activates control pathways that inhibit cell progression in the G1 and G2 phases and induce a transient delay in progression in the S phase. These checkpoints are in particular mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 activated by cyclin D1. Several preclinical studies have shown that CDK4/6i could be used as radiosensitizers in non-small cell lung cancer, medulloblastoma, brainstem glioma and breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibition also protected against radiation-induced intestinal toxicities by inducing redistribution of quiescent intestinal progenitor cells, making them less radiosensitive. Clinical data on the combination of CDK inhibitors and radiotherapy for both locoregional and metastatic irradiation are based on retrospective data. Nevertheless, the most optimal therapeutic sequence would be radiotherapy followed by palbociclib. Pending prospective clinical trials, the concomitant combination of the two treatments should be done under close supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Beddok
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, 91898 Orsay, France; Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France.
| | - B Porte
- Service d'oncologie médicale, GHU hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - P Cottu
- Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Fourquet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Efficacy of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors and Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052044. [PMID: 36902831 PMCID: PMC10004463 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy are the standard of care for HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients. However, their role in the treatment of brain metastases is currently unclear. We retrospectively evaluate the results of patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer treated at our institution with CDK4/6i and radiotherapy to the brain. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and severe toxicity. Among 371 pts treated with CDK4/6i, 24 pts (6.5%) received radiotherapy to the brain before (11 pts), during (6 pts), or after (7 pts) CDK4/6i treatment. Sixteen pts received ribociclib, six received palbociclib, and two received abemaciclib. Six- and twelve-month PFS was 76.5% (95% CI: 60.3-96.9) and 49.7% (95% CI: 31.7-77.9), respectively, whereas six- and twelve-month LC was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7-100) and 68.8% (95% CI: 44.5-100), respectively. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, no unexpected toxicity was observed. We conclude that treatment with both CDK4/6i and brain radiotherapy is feasible and should not increase the toxicity compared to brain radiotherapy or CDK4/6i alone. However, the small number of individuals treated concurrently limits the conclusions about the combination of both modalities, and the results from ongoing prospective clinical trials are eagerly awaited to understand both the toxicity profile and the clinical response fully.
Collapse
|
12
|
Incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicity with combined radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer using dose-volume parameters analysis: a multicenter cohort study. Breast Cancer 2023; 30:282-292. [PMID: 36528759 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01422-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of data on combined radiotherapy (RT) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) risk factors and toxicity. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicities in patients treated with combined RT and CDK4/6i using dose-volume parameter analysis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving RT within 14 days of CDK4/6i use. The endpoint was non-hematologic toxicities. Patient characteristics and RT treatment planning data were compared between the moderate or higher toxicities (≥ grade 2) group and the non-moderate toxicities group. RESULTS Sixty patients were included in the study. CDK4/6i was provided at a median daily dose of 125 mg and 200 mg for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. In patients who received concurrent RT and CDK4/6i (N = 29), the median concurrent prescribed duration of CDK4/6i was 14 days. The median delivered RT dose was 30 Gy and 10 fractions. The rate of grade 2 and 3 non-hematologic toxicities was 30% and 2%, respectively. There was no difference in toxicity between concurrent and sequential use of CDK4/6i. The moderate pneumonitis group had a larger lung V20 equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction and planning target volume than the non-moderate pneumonitis group. CONCLUSIONS Moderate toxicities are frequent with combined RT and CDK4/6i. Caution is necessary concerning the combined RT and CDK4/6i. Particularly, reducing the dose to normal organs is necessary for combined RT and CDK4/6i.
Collapse
|
13
|
Safety and Feasibility of Radiation Therapy Combined with CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030690. [PMID: 36765648 PMCID: PMC9913652 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in advanced hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy (RT) are conflicting. A retrospective evaluation of 288 advanced breast cancer patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6i was performed, and 100 pts also received RT. Forty-six pts received 63 RT courses concurrently and fifty-four sequentially before CDK4/6i initiation (76 RT courses). Neutropenia was common (79%) and more frequent during and after concurrent RT than sequential RT (86% vs. 76%); however, CDK4/6i dose reduction rates were similar. In patients treated with CDK4/6i alone, the dose reduction rate was 42% (79 pts) versus 38% with combined therapy, and 5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity in the combined group. The risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction was correlated with neutropenia grade, RT performed within the first two CDK4/6i cycles, and more than one concurrent RT; a tendency was observed in concurrent bone irradiation. However, on multivariate regression analysis, only ECOG 1 performance status and severe neutropenia at the beginning of the second cycle were found to be associated with a higher risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction. This largest single-center experience published to date confirmed the acceptable safety profile of the CDK4/6i and RT combination without a significantly increased toxicity compared with CDK4/6i alone. However, one might delay RT for the first two CDK4/6i cycles, when myelotoxic AE are most common.
Collapse
|
14
|
Systemic treatment with or without ablative therapies in oligometastatic breast cancer: A single institution analysis of patient outcomes. Breast 2022; 67:102-109. [PMID: 36709639 PMCID: PMC9982270 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Local ablative treatment (LAT) is increasingly combined with systemic therapy in oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC), without a high-level evidence to support this strategy. We evaluated the addition of LAT to systemic treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and toxicity. We sought to identify prognostic factors associated with longer OS and PFS. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2018 for synchronous or metachronous OMBC (defined as ≤ 5 metastases). LAT included stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), surgery, cryotherapy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRA). PFS and OS were calculated, and Cox regression models analyzed for potential predictors of survival. RESULTS One hundred two patients were included (no-LAT, n = 62; LAT, n = 40). Sixty-four metastases received LAT. Median follow-up was 50.4 months (95% CI [44.4; 53.4]). One patient experienced grade 3 toxicity in the LAT group. Five-year PFS and OS were 34.75% (95% CI [24.42-45.26]) and 63.21% (95% CI [50.69-73.37]) respectively. Patients receiving both LAT and systemic therapy had longer PFS and OS than those with no-LAT ([HR 0.39, p = 0.002]) and ([HR 0.31, p = 0.01]). The use of LAT, HER2-positive status and hormone-receptor positivity were associated with longer PFS and OS whereas liver metastases led to worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS LAT was associated with improved outcomes in OMBC when added to systemic treatment, without significantly increasing toxicity. The prognostic factors identified to extend PFS and OS may help guide clinicians in selecting patients for LAT.
Collapse
|
15
|
Visani L, Livi L, Ratosa I, Orazem M, Ribnikar D, Saieva C, Becherini C, Salvestrini V, Scoccimarro E, Valzano M, Cerbai C, Desideri I, Bernini M, Orzalesi L, Nori J, Bianchi S, Morandi A, Meattini I. Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors and concomitant radiation therapy in patients affected by metastatic breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:40-45. [PMID: 36349599 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) currently represent the standard of care for the initial treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety of the use of concomitant radiation therapy (RT) in a consecutive series of HR+/HER2- patients treated in two academic institutions with CDK4/6i in the metastatic setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS From September 2017 to February 2020, we retrospectively collected and analysed data on a sequential series of patients treated with CDK4/6i, receiving RT or not, at two European institutions. Primary outcome of the study was the association between RT and any adverse events (AEs) ≥ G3. Secondary outcomes were the association between RT and any AEs (any grade), CDK4/6i dose reduction rate, and CDK4/6i treatment discontinuation rate. RESULTS We analysed a total of 132 consecutive women; RT was prescribed in 57 (43.2%) patients (70 irradiated lesions). The median age of the series was 52.1 years (range 32.3-78.2). Concomitant RT administration was not significantly related to higher AEs ≥ G3 (p = 0.19) and any grade AEs (p = 1.0); there was no association with RT and CDK4/6i dose reduction (p = 0.49) and discontinuation rates (p = 0.14). At a median follow-up of 18.8 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 35% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 38.7% in the whole group. The use of concomitant RT did not affect both PFS (p = 0.71) and OS rates (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS Our data are encouraging regarding the safety of this combination, showing that concurrent RT did not increase severe toxicity and did not have an impact on systemic treatment conduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Visani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miha Orazem
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Domen Ribnikar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Calogero Saieva
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research Prevention and Clinical Network, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Erika Scoccimarro
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marianna Valzano
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Cecilia Cerbai
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Orzalesi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Nori
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Morandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim KN, Salerno M, Shah PD, Matro J, LaRiviere MJ. Severe acute radiation dermatitis after palbociclib therapy in the setting of palliative radiotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2022; 29:764-767. [PMID: 35929120 DOI: 10.1177/10781552221118841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cyclin-dependent-kinase 4/6(CDK4/6) inhibitors are widely used as a first-line systemic treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Although many patients with metastatic breast cancer require palliative radiotherapy (RT), there are limited data on the safety of combining a CDK4/6 inhibitor with palliative RT. CASE REPORT Presented is a case of acute high-grade radiation dermatitis with low-dose palliative RT following administration of palbociclib. A 49-year-old woman with newly diagnosed hormone receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast presented with lytic bone lesions in the left femur and lumbar spine. The patient initiated treatment with goserelin, tamoxifen, and palbociclib. She underwent prophylactic surgical fixation of the left femur and received post-operative RT encompassing the entire surgical nail (30 Gy/10 fractions) and palliative RT to the lumbar spine for pain relief (20 Gy/5 fractions). During cycle 4, palbociclib was stopped 3 days prior to the start of RT to reduce the risk of toxicity risk. However, 16 days after starting RT, she developed painful erythematous papules and bullae with moist desquamation on the left groin and lumbar spine. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME Her symptoms were managed with topical Aquaphor-lidocaine, silver sulfadiazine, and aluminum acetate soaks. Dermatitis subsided to dry desquamation within 2 weeks. The patient denied late toxicity at 11 months follow-up. DISCUSSION Larger retrospective or prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the safety of combined CDK4/6 inhibitors and RT. In the meantime, special precautions are warranted in patients receiving combined therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine N Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 6572University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Salerno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 6572University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Payal D Shah
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, 6572University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Matro
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, 8784University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Michael J LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 6572University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oligometastasis in breast cancer—current status and treatment options from a radiation oncology perspective. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:601-611. [PMID: 35527272 PMCID: PMC9217902 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AbstractEvidence from a few small randomized trials and retrospective cohorts mostly including various tumor entities indicates a prolongation of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from local ablative therapies in oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, it is still unclear which patients benefit most from this approach. We give an overview of the several aspects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in extracranial OMD in breast cancer from a radiation oncology perspective. A PubMed search referring to this was conducted. An attempt was made to relate the therapeutic efficacy of SBRT to various prognostic factors. Data from approximately 500 breast cancer patients treated with SBRT for OMD in mostly in small cohort studies have been published, consistently indicating high local tumor control rates and favorable progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictors for a good prognosis after SBRT are favorable biological subtype (hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative), solitary metastasis, bone-only metastasis, and long metastasis-free interval. However, definitive proof that SBRT in OMD breast cancer prolongs DFS or OS is lacking, since, with the exception of one small randomized trial (n = 22 in the SBRT arm), none of the cohort studies had an adequate control group. Further studies are needed to prove the benefit of SBRT in OMD breast cancer and to define adequate selection criteria. Currently, the use of local ablative SBRT should always be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board.
Collapse
|
18
|
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:76-83. [PMID: 35620018 PMCID: PMC9127274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence is emerging for new paradigms in the management of non-spine bone metastases. Consensus was feasible amongst physicians in both academic and community-based practice settings. Topics deemed of highest importance for consensus included referral for surgical stabilization and approach to peri-operative radiation, preferred radiation fractionation and appropriate use of stereotactic techniques, and clinical scenarios classified as potentially “complex” warranting multidisciplinary discussion.
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
19
|
Radiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:114-131. [PMID: 34819622 PMCID: PMC9004227 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00579-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
A variety of targeted anticancer agents have been successfully introduced into clinical practice, largely reflecting their ability to inhibit specific molecular alterations that are required for disease progression. However, not all malignant cells rely on such alterations to survive, proliferate, disseminate and/or evade anticancer immunity, implying that many tumours are intrinsically resistant to targeted therapies. Radiotherapy is well known for its ability to activate cytotoxic signalling pathways that ultimately promote the death of cancer cells, as well as numerous cytoprotective mechanisms that are elicited by cellular damage. Importantly, many cytoprotective mechanisms elicited by radiotherapy can be abrogated by targeted anticancer agents, suggesting that radiotherapy could be harnessed to enhance the clinical efficacy of these drugs. In this Review, we discuss preclinical and clinical data that introduce radiotherapy as a tool to elicit or amplify clinically actionable signalling pathways in patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
Jiménez-Cortegana C, Klapp V, Bloy N, Galassi C, Sato A, Yamazaki T, Buqué A, Galluzzi L, Petroni G. Cytofluorometric assessment of cell cycle progression in irradiated cells. Methods Cell Biol 2022; 172:1-16. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2021.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Pesch AM, Hirsh NH, Michmerhuizen AR, Jungles KM, Wilder-Romans K, Chandler BC, Liu M, Lerner LM, Nino CA, Ward C, Cobain EF, Lawrence TS, Pierce LJ, Rae JM, Speers CW. RB expression confers sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization across breast cancer subtypes. JCI Insight 2021; 7:154402. [PMID: 34932500 PMCID: PMC8855810 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.154402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard radiation therapy (RT) does not reliably provide locoregional control for women with multinode-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) would increase the radiosensitivity not only of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) cells, but also of TNBC that expresses retinoblastoma (RB) protein. We found that CDK4/6i radiosensitized RB WT TNBC (n = 4, radiation enhancement ratio [rER]: 1.49–2.22) but failed to radiosensitize RB-null TNBC (n = 3, rER: 0.84–1.00). RB expression predicted response to CDK4/6i + RT (R2 = 0.84), and radiosensitization was lost in ER+/TNBC cells (rER: 0.88–1.13) after RB1 knockdown in isogenic and nonisogenic models. CDK4/6i suppressed homologous recombination (HR) in RB WT cells but not in RB-null cells or isogenic models of RB1 loss; HR competency was rescued with RB reexpression. Radiosensitization was independent of nonhomologous end joining and the known effects of CDK4/6i on cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, RB and RAD51 interact in vitro to promote HR repair. CDK4/6i produced RB-dependent radiosensitization in TNBC xenografts but not in isogenic RB1-null xenografts. Our data provide the preclinical rationale for a clinical trial expanding the use of CDK4/6i + RT to difficult-to-control RB-intact breast cancers (including TNBC) and nominate RB status as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Pesch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Nicole H Hirsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Anna R Michmerhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Kassidy M Jungles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michgan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Kari Wilder-Romans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Benjamin C Chandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Meilan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Lynn M Lerner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Charles A Nino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Connor Ward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Erin F Cobain
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Lori J Pierce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - James M Rae
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| | - Corey W Speers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Beddok A, Cottu P, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Combination of Modern Radiotherapy and New Targeted Treatments for Breast Cancer Management. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246358. [PMID: 34944978 PMCID: PMC8699586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Since the introduction of hormone therapy for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) three decades ago, many new targeted therapies have been developed. Some of them are currently used, such as HER2 inhibitors, while others are still under development, such as cell cycle (CDK) inhibitors, immune checkpoint (PD1/PDL1) inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage (PARP) repair. Besides this, radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used either as adjuvant treatment for early BC after breast conservative surgery or in palliative intent for the treatment of metastatic sites. Our research has shown that the combinations of the most commonly used targeted treatments and RT were feasible with a few toxicities. Nevertheless, most of the knowledge on this subject is based on retrospective studies and a small number of patients and care should be taken in this setting until these results would be confirmed in prospective randomized studies. Abstract Background: The objective of the present study was to review the essential knowledge about the combinations of the most commonly used or under development targeted treatments and radiation therapy (RT). Methods: Preclinical and clinical studies investigating this combination were extensively reviewed. Results: Several studies showed that the combination of RT and tamoxifen increased the risk of radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity; therefore, both modalities should not be given concomitantly. The combination of HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and RT seems to be safe. However, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) should not be administered concurrently with brain RT since this combination could increase the risk of brain radionecrosis. The combination of RT and other new target treatments such as selective estrogen receptor degradants, lapatinib, cell cycle inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage repair seems feasible but was essentially evaluated on retrospective or prospective studies with a small number of patients. Furthermore, there is considerable heterogeneity among these studies regarding the dose and fractionation of radiation, the dosage of drugs, and the sequence of treatments used. Conclusions: The combination of RT with most targeted therapies for BC appears to be well-tolerated, but these results need to be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (A.F.); (Y.K.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 91400 Orsay, France
- Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology (LITO), UMR (U1288), Institut Curie, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +33-144324504
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Alain Fourquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (A.F.); (Y.K.)
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (A.F.); (Y.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim KN, Shah P, Clark A, Freedman GM, Dastgheyb S, Barsky AR, Dreyfuss AD, Taunk NK. Safety of cyclin-dependent kinase4/6 inhibitor combined with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast 2021; 60:163-167. [PMID: 34653725 PMCID: PMC8527028 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor is a first-line therapy for metastatic ER+/HER2-breast cancer. However, there are limited data on safety of combined radiotherapy (RT) and CDK4/6 inhibition. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of women with metastatic breast cancer who received palliative RT within 14 days of CDK4/6 inhibitor use. The primary endpoint was toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Secondary endpoints were pain response and local control based on clinical assessment and imaging. Results Thirty patients underwent 36 RT courses with palbociclib (n = 34 courses, 94.4%) or abemaciclib (n = 2, 5.6%). RT was delivered before, concurrently or after CDK4/6 inhibitors in 7 (19.4%), 8 (22.2%), and 21 (58.3%) of cases with median 3.5 days from RT to closest CDK4/6 inhibitor administration. Median RT dose was 30Gy (range 8–40.05Gy). Treated sites included brain (n = 5, 11.6%), spine (n = 19, 44.2%), pelvis (n = 9, 20.9%), other bony sites (n = 6, 14.0%) and others (n = 4, 9.3%). No acute grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity occurred. No increased hematologic toxicity was attributable to RT with grade 3 hematologic toxicities rates 16.7%, 0%, and 6.7% before, during, and 2 weeks after RT completion. All but one patient (29/30) achieved symptom relief. Local control rates were 94.4%, 91.7% at 6 and 12 months. Conclusions The use of RT within 2 weeks of CDK4/6 inhibitors had low acceptable toxicity and high efficacy, suggesting that it is safe for palliation of metastatic breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy is a preferred first line therapy for HR+, HER2-metastatic breast cancer. Limited data exists on safety of combined radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with metastatic breast cancer. This retrospective cohort study included 30 patients who underwent palliative RT with combined CDK4/6 inhibitor use. RT within 2 weeks of CDK4/6 inhibitor had low toxicity and high efficacy, supporting its safety in metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine N Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Payal Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Clark
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sana Dastgheyb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexandra D Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil K Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tonse R, Tom MC, Mehta MP, Ahluwalia MS, Kotecha R. Integration of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153682. [PMID: 34359583 PMCID: PMC8345095 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the multi-modal treatment of brain metastasis (BM), the role of systemic therapy has undergone a recent revolution. Due to the development of multiple agents with modest central nervous system penetration of the blood-brain barrier, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being utilized alone or in combination with radiation therapy. However, the adoption of sequential or concurrent strategies varies considerably, and treatment strategies employed in clinical practice have rapidly outpaced evidence development. Therefore, this review critically analyzes the data regarding combinatorial approaches for a variety of systemic therapeutics with stereotactic radiosurgery and provides an overview of ongoing clinical trials. Abstract Brain metastasis (BM) represents a common complication of cancer, and in the modern era requires multi-modal management approaches and multi-disciplinary care. Traditionally, due to the limited efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, treatment strategies are focused on local treatments alone, such as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and resection. However, the increased availability of molecular-based therapies with central nervous system (CNS) penetration now permits the individualized selection of tailored systemic therapies to be used alongside local treatments. Moreover, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with demonstrated CNS activity has further revolutionized the management of BM patients. The rapid introduction of these cancer therapeutics into clinical practice, however, has led to a significant dearth in the published literature about the optimal timing, sequencing, and combination of these systemic therapies along with SRS. This manuscript reviews the impact of tumor biology and molecular profiles on the management paradigm for BM patients and critically analyzes the current landscape of SRS, with a specific focus on integration with systemic therapy. We also discuss emerging treatment strategies combining SRS and ICIs, the impact of timing and the sequencing of these therapies around SRS, the effect of corticosteroids, and review post-treatment imaging findings, including pseudo-progression and radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raees Tonse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA; (R.T.); (M.C.T.); (M.P.M.)
| | - Martin C. Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA; (R.T.); (M.C.T.); (M.P.M.)
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA;
| | - Minesh P. Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA; (R.T.); (M.C.T.); (M.P.M.)
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA;
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA; (R.T.); (M.C.T.); (M.P.M.)
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(786)-596-2000
| |
Collapse
|