Predictors of response to liraglutide in Japanese type 2 diabetes

Prediction scale of response to liraglutide therapy as the method for increase of treatment efficacy in type 2 diabetes

Background:

The effects of liraglutide on body weight and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) level vary greatly. The cost of this drug negatively affects treatment adherence.

Aim:

To reveal the baseline patient characteristics, associated with a better response to liraglutide.

Materials and methods:

A total of 41 patients with BMI of 39.63 ± 7.59 kg/m² who received liraglutide injection up to 1.8 or 3.0 mg/day for 6 months were enrolled. Demographic and anthropometric data, parameters of glycemic control, food intake, hormones and responses to the eating behavior questionnaire were collected.

Results:

Weight reduction was dose-dependent (p = 0.007). Liraglutide was not effective in patients with BMI >45 kg/m². The baseline HbA1c level was a significant factor for HbA1c reduction. Lower leptin and higher glucagon-like-peptide 1 concentrations might predict better weight loss response to liraglutide.

Conclusion:

Drug-specific efficacy predictors were assumed; thus, further studies are needed to prove their significance.

The objective of this study was to identify the baseline patient characteristics as a predictors associated with a better response to liraglutide. It is related to different effect of liraglutide on body weight and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in different patients. We found that weight reduction was dose-dependent (p = 0.007) and liraglutide was not effective in patients with BMI >45 kg/m². The baseline HbA1c level significantly correlated with HbA1c reduction. Lower leptin and higher glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations might predict better weight loss response to liraglutide.

High-Dose Liraglutide and SGLT2 Inhibitor: A Promising Combination

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are important drugs in our armamentarium of treatment for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). In addition to their glucose-lowering effects, they have effects on weight, other metabolic diseases and perhaps most importantly, a cardioprotective and reno-protective effect. Liraglutide is a long-acting GLP-1 agonist which was originally used at 1.8 mg daily for the treatment of DM. However, high-dose liraglutide—liraglutide 3 mg daily, has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment for obesity, with or without DM. In this manuscript, I present two patients who had unusual responses to combination therapy with high-dose liraglutide and SGLT2 inhibitor—marked and/or rapid improvement in glycemic control and weight loss. Drawing from the observations in both cases, I discuss the complementary mechanisms of actions of both drugs, review the clinical effects of combination therapy and distil them into clinical pearls of practical utility for the physician. Given the “clash of the two pandemics” of obesity and COVID-19 and the burgeoning rates of obesity which loom in the near horizon, this is most timely.

Liraglutide effects on glycemic control and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes Mellitus: A real-world, observational study and brief narrative review

BACKGROUND

Glycemic control and weight gain are two essential considerations in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacological agents are effective in lowering blood glucose levels but may result in significant weight gain. Liraglutideeffectively maintains glycemic control while reducingweight.

METHODS

This is a real-world study and brief narrative review of the effects of liraglutide on glycemic control and weight in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study uses data extracted from the electronic health record of the Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs.

RESULTS

In this study of 348 subjects, there was a statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c of 0.9% (P < .0001) and weight of 2.3 kg (P < .0001). The majority (77.3%) were on concomitant insulin.Subjects with a baseline hemoglobin A1c greater than 9% had a significantly greater reduction than those below 9% (-0.7%;P < .0001). Those with a weight more than 100 kg had a significantly greater reduction than those below 100 kg (-0.9 kg;P = .0096).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world, observational study, liraglutide was shown to be effective in improving glycemic control and reducing weight in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Application of machine learning methods for the development of antidiabetic drugs

Diabetes is a chronic non-communicable disease caused by several different routes, which has attracted increasing attention. In order to speed up the development of new selective drugs, machine learning (ML) technology has been applied in the process of diabetes drug development, which opens up a new blueprint for drug design. This review provides a comprehensive portrayal of the application of ML in antidiabetic drug use.

Combination use of liraglutide and insulin to Japanese patients with multiple insulin injection: efficacy and cost

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of liraglutide in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes already taking insulin is still subject to discussion in terms of timing and benefits. Gradually intensive insulin therapy is hastily prescribed. Switching from multiple insulin injection (MII) to insulin and liraglutide is evaluated in this study.

METHODOLOGY

We studied 92 patients with type 2 diabetes previously under MII, C-peptide ≥ 1.5 ng/ml, divided into a group with reasonable glycemic control [RC: HbA1c < 8% (64 mmol/mol)] and another with a poor control [PC: HbA1c ≥ 8%, (64 mmol/mol)] after introduction of liraglutide and insulin therapy.

RESULTS

Except for HbA1c, there were no statistical differences between RC and PC groups. Basal insulin doses were adjusted to achieve the fasting plasma glucose of 90-120 mg/dl. HbA1c was significantly improved in both groups, from 9.6% ± 1.6 (81 mmol/mol) and 7.0% ± 0.6 (53 mmol/mol) to 8.0% ± 1.5 (64 mmol/mol) and 6.8 ± 0.5% (51 mmol/mol). Reduction of body weight was significant only in RC (from 70 ± 16 kg to 68 ± 16 kg, p < 0.01). All patients from RC group and 58% of PC group reached HbA1c < 8% without hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

This observation persuades us to propose the liraglutide and insulin combination to patients with C-peptide ≥ 1.5 ng/ml, regardless of the HbA1c.

Predictors of treatment response to liraglutide in type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting

AIMS

There is an unmet need among healthcare providers to identify subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes who are most likely to respond to treatment.

METHODS

Data were taken from electronic medical records of participants of an observational, retrospective study in Italy. We used logistic regression models to assess the odds of achieving glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction ≥ 1.0% point after 12-month treatment with liraglutide (primary endpoint), according to various patient-related factors. RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation (RECPAM) analysis was used to identify distinct homogeneous patient subgroups with different odds of achieving the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Data from 1325 patients were included, of which 577 (43.5%) achieved HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0% point (10.9 mmol/mol) after 12 months. Logistic regression showed that for each additional 1% HbA1c at baseline, the odds of reaching this endpoint were increased 3.5 times (95% CI: 2.90-4.32). By use of RECPAM analysis, five distinct responder subgroups were identified, with baseline HbA1c and diabetes duration as the two splitting variables. Patients in the most poorly controlled subgroup (RECPAM Class 1, mean baseline HbA1c > 9.1% [76 mmol/mol]) had a 28-fold higher odds of reaching the endpoint versus patients in the best-controlled group (mean baseline HbA1c ≤ 7.5% [58 mmol/mol]). Mean HbA1c reduction from baseline was as large as - 2.2% (24 mol/mol) in the former versus - 0.1% (1.1 mmol/mol) in the latter. Mean weight reduction ranged from 2.5 to 4.3 kg across RECPAM subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycaemic response to liraglutide is largely driven by baseline HbA1c levels and, to a lesser extent, by diabetes duration.

A Class Comparison of Medication Persistence in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Longer medication persistence in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with improved glycaemic control. It is not clear which oral therapies have the best persistence. The objective of this study was to compare medication persistence across different oral therapies in people with T2D.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using a primary-care-based population, the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre cohort. We identified new prescriptions for oral diabetes medication in people with type 2 diabetes between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2015. We compared median persistence across each class. We also compared non-persistence (defined as a prescription gap of ≥ 90 days) between classes, adjusting for confounders, using Cox regression. Confounders included: age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, alcohol use, smoking status, glycaemic control, diabetes duration, diabetes complications, comorbidities, and number of previous and concurrent diabetes medications.

RESULTS

We identified 60,327 adults with T2D. The majority 42,810 (70.9%) of those had one or more oral medications prescribed; we measured persistence in those patients (who were prescribed 55,728 oral medications in total). Metformin had the longest median persistence (3.04 years; 95% CI 2.94-3.12). The adjusted hazard ratios for non-persistence compared with metformin were: sulfonylureas HR 1.20 (1.16-1.24), DPP-4 inhibitors HR 1.43 (1.38-1.49), thiazolidinediones HR 1.71 (95% CI 1.64-1.77), SGLT2 inhibitors HR 1.04 (0.93-1.17), meglitinides HR 2.25 (1.97-2.58), and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors HR 2.45 (1.98-3.02). The analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors was limited by the short duration of follow-up for this new class. Other factors associated with reduced medication persistence were female gender, younger age, and non-white ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence is strongly influenced by medication class and should be considered when initiating treatments.

Variables associated with HbA1c and weight reductions when adding liraglutide to multiple daily insulin injections in persons with type 2 diabetes (MDI Liraglutide trial 3)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate variables associated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight reduction when adding liraglutide to persons with type 2 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a reanalysis of a previous trial where 124 patients were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter randomized trial carried out over 24 weeks. Predictors for effect on change in HbA1c and weight were analyzed within the treatment group and with concurrent interaction analyses. Correlation analyses for change in HbA1c and weight from baseline to week 24 were made.

RESULTS

The mean age at baseline was 63.7 years, 64.8% were men, the mean number of insulin injections was 4.4 per day, the mean daily insulin dose was 105 units and the mean HbA1c was 74.5 mmol/mol (9.0%). The mean HbA1c and weight reductions were 12.3 mmol/mol (1.13%; P<0.001) and 3.8 kg (P<0.001) greater in liraglutide than placebo-treated persons. There was no significant predictor for greater effect on HbA1c that existed in all analyses (univariate, multivariate and interaction analyses against controls). For a greater weight reduction when adding liraglutide, a lower HbA1c level at baseline was a predictor (liraglutide group P=0.002, P=0.020 for liraglutide group vs placebo). During follow-up in the liraglutide group, no significant correlation was found between change in weight and change in HbA1c (r=0.09, P=0.46), whereas a correlation existed between weight and insulin dose reduction (r=0.44, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Weight reduction becomes greater when adding liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with MDI who had a lower HbA1c level compared with those with a higher HbA1c level. There was no correlation between reductions in HbA1c and weight when liraglutide was added, that is, different patient groups responded with HbA1c and weight reductions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT nr: 2012-001941-42.

Baseline Body Mass Index and the Efficacy of Hypoglycemic Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of hypoglycemic treatments in groups of patients categorized according to the mean baseline body mass indexes (BMIs).

METHODS

Studies were identified by a literature search and all the studies were double blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials in type 2 diabetes patients; study length of ≥12 weeks with the efficacy evaluated by changes in HbA1c from baseline in groups. The electronic search was first conducted in January 2015 and repeated in June 2015.

RESULTS

227 studies were included. Treatment with sulfonylureas was compared with placebo in overweight patients and resulted in a significantly greater change in the HbA1c levels (weighted mean difference (WMD), -1.39%) compared to obese patients (WMD, -0.77%)(p<0.05). Treatment with metformin in overweight patients resulted in a comparable change in the HbA1c levels (WMD, -0.99%) compared to obese patients (WMD, -1.06%)(p>0.05). Treatment with alpha glucosidase inhibitors in normal weight patients was associated with a HbA1c change (WMD, -0.94%) that was comparable that in overweight (WMD, -0.72%) and obese patients (WMD, -0.56%)(p>0.05). Treatment with thiazolidinediones in normal weight patients was associated with a HbA1c change (WMD, -1.04%) that was comparable with that in overweight (WMD, -1.02%) and obese patients (WMD, -0.88%)(p>0.05). Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors in normal weight patients was associated with a HbA1c change (WMD, -0.93%) that was comparable with that in overweight (WMD, -0.66%) and obese patients (WMD, -0.61%)(p>0.05). In total, of the seven hypoglycemic agents, regression analysis indicated that the mean baseline BMI was not associated with the mean HbA1c changes from baseline.

CONCLUSION

In each kind of hypoglycemic therapy in type 2 diabetes, the baseline BMI was not associated with the efficacy of HbA1c changes from baseline.

Clinical Effectiveness of Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in the Real-World Setting: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

In clinical trials, liraglutide has proven to be an effective drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The real-world effectiveness of liraglutide has been investigated in numerous studies. The aim of this systematic literature review is to collate evidence on the real-world clinical effectiveness of liraglutide.

METHODS

A review of publications from Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings was conducted to identify observational studies that assessed the clinical effectiveness of liraglutide in real-world clinical practice. This review was conducted according to the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. No language or time limits were applied, except to the conference proceedings (2013-2015). Endpoints for data extraction were decided a priori. Study quality appraisal was done for full-text journal articles.

RESULTS

Of 124 publications included in the review, 43 were full-text articles. Liraglutide significantly reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) within 6 months of initiating treatment (mean change in HbA1c from baseline: -0.9% to -2.2%; HbA1c <7.0%: 29.5-65.0%). The NICE composite endpoint (HbA1c reduction ≥1% and weight reduction ≥3%) was met in 16.9-47.0% of patients with liraglutide treatment. Liraglutide therapy led to a mean change in absolute weight from baseline of -1.3 to -8.65 kg. Liraglutide treatment was well tolerated in patients with T2DM. The rate of occurrence of hypoglycemia with liraglutide monotherapy was ≤0.8%. Hypoglycemia was more common in patients taking antidiabetic medications (0.0-15.2%) together with liraglutide. The beneficial glycemic and weight effect of liraglutide therapy in patients with T2DM was maintained for at least 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from observational studies reflecting real-world clinical practice demonstrates that liraglutide therapy improves glycemic control with a low risk of hypoglycemia, and is associated with significant weight loss in patients with T2DM. These observations are consistent with clinical trial findings.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Efficacy of hypoglycemic treatment in type 2 diabetes stratified by age or diagnosed age: a meta-analysis

AIM

To compare the effects of blood glucose lowering regimens in groups of patients categorized by baseline age and diagnosed age.

METHODS

Placebo-controlled randomized trials in type 2 diabetes patients with a study length ≥12 weeks were included.

RESULTS

A total of 246 trials were included. HbA1c changes from baseline corrected by placebo were comparable in sulfonylurea treatment between older and younger patients' groups (weighted mean difference (WMD), -1.28% vs -0.92%, p > 0.05). Treatment with metformin between groups resulted in a comparable change in HbA1c levels (WMD, -0.97% vs -1.23%, p > 0.05). Treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitor (WMD, -0.68% vs -0.67%, p > 0.05), treatment with thiazolidinedione (WMD, -0.74% vs -1.01%, p > 0.05), treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (WMD, -0.67% vs -0.67%, p > 0.05), and treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD, -0.54% vs -0.67%, p > 0.05) between groups also resulted in comparable HbA1c changes. Treatment with GLP-1 analogs between groups in HbA1c changes were also comparable (p > 0.05). Regression analysis indicated that the baseline age or diagnosed age was not associated with the HbA1c changes from baseline.

CONCLUSION

In each hypoglycemic treatment, the baseline age or diagnosed age was not associated with the HbA1c changes from baseline.

A higher body mass index attenuates the long-term HbA1c-lowering effects of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes patients treated using sulfonylurea-based therapy

Objective

To identify the attenuating factor of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)-lowering effects of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients over the long term.

Methods

Forty-six T2D patients received liraglutide-glimepiride combination therapy. Clinical characteristics were compared between the following two subgroups: the relapse group (≥0.4 % increase in HbA1c in 48 weeks compared to 12 weeks) and non-relapse group (remaining patients). A glucagon-loading test was performed to evaluate baseline endogenous insulin secretion.

Results

In the relapse group, significantly reduced HbA1c, as observed at 12 weeks, tended to increase at 24 and 48 weeks. In the non-relapse group, reduced HbA1c was maintained for 48 weeks. Body weight was decreased at 12 weeks and then recovered at 48 weeks in both groups. Baseline BMI was significantly higher in the relapse group than in the non-relapse group. Age, HbA1c, duration of diabetes, fasting C-peptide, daily glimepiride dose and the duration of glimepiride treatment were comparable between both groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline BMI was independently associated with the relapse group.

Conclusion

A higher BMI is the leading factor for attenuating long-term glycemic control by liraglutide in T2D patients undergoing sulfonylurea-based therapy.

Systematic review of adherence rates by medication class in type 2 diabetes: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for type 2 diabetes are becoming increasingly complex with people often prescribed multiple medications, and may include both oral and injectable therapies. There is ongoing debate about which drug classes provide the optimum second-line and third-line treatment options. In the real world, patient adherence and persistence determines medication effectiveness. A better understanding of adherence may help inform the choice of second-line and third-line drug classes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review will compare adherence and persistence rates across the different classes of medication available to people with type 2 diabetes. It will include all identified studies comparing medication adherence or persistence between two or more glucose-lowering medications in people with type 2 diabetes. Research databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, The Register of Controlled Trials, PsychINFO and CINAHL) will be searched for relevant articles, using a comprehensive search strategy. All identified medication trials and observational studies will be included which compare adherence or persistence across classes of diabetes medication. The characteristics and outcomes of all the included studies will be reported along with a study quality grade, assessed using the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool. The quality of adjustment for confounders of adherence or persistence will be reported for each study. Where multiple (n ≥ 3) studies provide compare adherence or persistence across the same 2 medication classes, a meta-analysis will be performed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval is required. This review and meta-analysis (where possible) will provide important information on the relative patient adherence and persistence, with the different classes of diabetes therapies. Once complete, the results will be made available by peer-reviewed publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015027865.

Retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of liraglutide monotherapy and sulfonylurea-combination therapy in Japanese type 2 diabetes: Association of remaining β-cell function and achievement of HbA1c target one year after initiation

AIMS

The GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide improves impaired pancreatic β-cell function, thereby exerting glucose-lowering effects. However, the association of remaining β-cell function with long-term therapeutic efficacy of liraglutide remains largely unknown.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes who started liraglutide as monotherapy or sulfonylurea-combination therapy were retrospectively analyzed to identify possible associations of indices related to β-cell function including increments of C-peptide immunoreactivity in glucagon stimulation test (GST-ΔCPR) with achievement of HbA1c <7.0% at 54weeks after liraglutide initiation.

RESULTS

Among 165 subjects continuing liraglutide for 54weeks, 66 received additional oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) during the period. Of those continuing liraglutide without receiving additional OADs, 41 subjects achieved HbA1c <7.0% at 54weeks, while 49 subjects did not. Subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% showed higher values of GST-ΔCPR. Receiver-operating analysis revealed 2.34ng/mL as the cut-off value for HbA1c <7.0% achievement in these subjects. Subjects with GST-ΔCPR >2.34ng/mL showed continuous and substantial HbA1c reduction throughout the 54weeks. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, subjects with GST-ΔCPR >2.34ng/mL showed longer therapeutic durability of initial liraglutide therapy with no additional OADs or insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite numerous limitations, these results indicate that long-term efficacy of liraglutide is associated with remaining β-cell function at initiation.