Joint 30-year HbA1c and lipid trajectories and mortality in type 1 diabetes

Longitudinal trajectories of glycemic control among U.S. Adults with newly diagnosed diabetes

AIMS

To identify longitudinal trajectories of glycemic control among adults with newly diagnosed diabetes, overall and by diabetes type.

METHODS

We analyzed claims data from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse for 119,952 adults newly diagnosed diabetes between 2005 and 2018. We applied a novel Mixed Effects Machine Learning model to identify longitudinal trajectories of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over 3 years of follow-up and used multinomial regression to characterize factors associated with each trajectory.

RESULTS

The study population was comprised of 119,952 adults with newly diagnosed diabetes, including 696 (0.58%) with type 1 diabetes. Among patients with type 1 diabetes, 52.6% were diagnosed at very high HbA1c, partially improved, but never achieved control; 32.5% were diagnosed at low HbA1c and deteriorated over time; and 14.9% had stable low HbA1c. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, 67.7% had stable low HbA1c, 14.4% were diagnosed at very high HbA1c, partially improved, but never achieved control; 10.0% were diagnosed at moderately high HbA1c and deteriorated over time; and 4.9% were diagnosed at moderately high HbA1c and improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Claims data identified distinct longitudinal trajectories of HbA1c after diabetes diagnosis, which can be used to anticipate challenges and individualize care plans to improve glycemic control.

Lipid-lowering therapies and cardiovascular risk-stratification strategies in adults with type 1 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although dyslipidaemia is a modifiable and prevalent risk factor in individuals with T1D, determining when to initiate lipid-lowering therapy for primary prevention of ASCVD can be challenging. In this article, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapy from updated clinical guidelines over the last 5 years, additional risk-stratification methods, hypertriglyceridaemia management and potential barriers to optimal care in adults with T1D are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary target for lipid-lowering. However, international guidelines recommend differing approaches to ASCVD risk-stratification, lipid-lowering, and LDL-C goals in individuals with diabetes, predominantly reflecting evidence from studies in type 2 diabetes. Despite guideline recommendations, several studies have demonstrated that statins are underused, and LDL-C goals are not attained by many individuals with T1D. Additional risk-stratification methods including T1D-specific ASCVD risk calculators, coronary artery calcium scoring, and lipoprotein(a) may provide additional information to define when to initiate lipid-lowering therapy.

SUMMARY

Clinical trial evidence for lipid-lowering therapies in T1D is lacking, and further studies are needed to inform best practice. Optimization and harmonization of ASCVD risk-stratification and lipid management in individuals with T1D is required.

Dietary treatment of type 1 diabetes: Beyond carbohydrate counting to fight cardiovascular risk

AIMS

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is tied to an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Dietary treatment would be an elective therapeutic strategy to fight this risk. However, it is not known what the best dietary approach is. We revisited the currently available literature on the nutritional treatment of T1D in the light of their potential comprehensive effects on the management of cardio-metabolic risk factors (body weight, fasting and postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nutritional research in T1D is mainly focused on blood glucose control, with most of the trials aiming at evaluating the acute effects of nutrients on postprandial glycemic response. The effects of the quantity and quality of nutrients and some specific foods on other metabolic risk factors have been explored mainly in cross-sectional analysis. Very few well-designed nutritional trials evaluated the best dietary approach to comprehensively manage cardiovascular risk by targeting along with blood glucose control, overweight, fasting and postprandial dyslipidemia. Therefore, the current best practice guidance for the dietary management of cardiovascular risk in T1D is generally based on evidence from patients with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-conducted nutritional trials specifically designed for T1D are needed to identify the best dietary treatment to fight cardiovascular risk in these patients.