Authorized SARS-CoV-2 molecular methods show wide variability in the limit of detection

Evaluating User Experience and DNA Yield from Self-Collection Devices

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized an urgent need for devices used in the self-collection of biospecimens in an evolving patient care system. The mailing of biospecimen self-collection kits to patients, with samples returned via mail, provides a more convenient testing regimen, but could also impart patient sampling variabilities. User compliance with device directions is central to downstream testing of collected biospecimens and clear instructions are central to this goal.

METHODS

Here, we performed an evaluation of 10 oral DNA collection devices involving either swab or saliva self-collection and analyzed ease of use and comfort level with a device, as well as DNA recovery quantity/quality and sample stability.

RESULTS

We show that while these DNA quality/quantity metrics are comparable between devices, users prefer direct saliva collection over swab-based devices.

CONCLUSIONS

This information is useful in guiding future experiments including their use in human RNA, microbial, or viral sample collection/recovery and their use in clinical testing.

SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization published sensitivity differences do not correlate with positivity rate in a hospital/reference laboratory setting

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic skyrocketing demand for testing in the United States, coupled with supply chain issues, necessitated the use of multiple SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing platforms at many health centers. At our institution these platforms consisted of 8 ordered services for sample triage, using 9 emergency use authorized (EUA) SARS-CoV-2 RNA nucleic acid amplification tests resulting in 10 possible ordered service/EAU combinations. Here we review the results of the first ∼2.9 million samples tested and note the variability in positivity rates. We conclude that differences in reported limit of detection did not translate to differences in positivity rate or show correlation to discordant results observed. This highlights the importance of balancing patient testing capacity needs with the desire to have more sensitive tests.

Evaluation of the analytical performance of the 15-minute point-of-care DASH™ SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test

Accurate and timely diagnosis for COVID-19 diagnosis allows highly effective antiviral medications to be prescribed. The DASH™ Rapid PCR System is a sample-to-answer point-of-care platform combining state-of-the-art PCR kinetics with sequence specific hybridization. The platform's first assay, the DASH™ SARS-CoV-2/S test for anterior nares direct swab specimens, received FDA Emergency Use Authorization in March 2022 for point-of-care use. Here we report the analytical characteristics of the assay including limit of detection, dynamic range, and robustness of SARS-CoV-2 variant detection. The limit of detection was determined by testing swabs contrived with one hundred copies of wild type or Omicron BA.5 virus and detecting 20/20 and 19/20, respectively. The dynamic range was assessed with contrived swabs containing 102-106 copies; the log-linear relationship between Cq and copy input was plotted, and the qPCR efficiency calculated from the slope of the line was 101.4%. Detection of seven SARS-CoV-2 variants was demonstrated.