1
|
Hammoudi N, Lehmann-Che J, Lambert J, Amoyel M, Maggiori L, Salfati D, Tran Minh ML, Baudry C, Asesio N, Poirot B, Lourenco N, Corte H, Allez M, Aparicio T, Gornet JM. Prognosis and molecular characteristics of IBD-associated colorectal cancer: Experience from a French tertiary-care center. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1280-1287. [PMID: 36872200 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the prognosis of colorectal cancer associated with inflammatory bowel disease (CRC-IBD) in a real-world cohort in France. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study including all patients presenting CRC-IBD in a French tertiary center. RESULTS Among 6510 patients, the rate of CRC was 0.8% with a median delay of 19.5 years after IBD diagnosis (median age 46 years, ulcerative colitis 59%, initially localized tumor 69%). There was a previous exposure to immunosuppressants (IS) in 57% and anti-TNF in 29% of the cases. A RAS mutation was observed in only 13% of metastatic patients. OS of the whole cohort was 45 months. OS and PFS of synchronous metastatic patients was 20.4 months and 8.5 months respectively. Among the patients with localized tumor those previously exposed to IS had a better PFS (39 months vs 23 months; p = 0.05) and OS (74 vs 44 months; p = 0.03). The IBD relapse rate was 4%. No unexpected chemotherapy side-effect was observed CONCLUSIONS: OS of CRC-IBD is poor in metastatic patients although IBD is not associated with under-exposure or increased toxicity to chemotherapy. Previous IS exposure may be associated with a better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Hammoudi
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1160, EMiLy, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Paris, France; Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - J Lehmann-Che
- Department of molecular oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - J Lambert
- Department of biostatistics, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris University, Paris, France. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris - France
| | - M Amoyel
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - L Maggiori
- Department of digestive surgery, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - D Salfati
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - M L Tran Minh
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - C Baudry
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - N Asesio
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - B Poirot
- Department of molecular oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - N Lourenco
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - H Corte
- Department of digestive surgery, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Allez
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1160, EMiLy, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Paris, France; Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - T Aparicio
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1160, EMiLy, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Paris, France; Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - J M Gornet
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis / Lariboisière, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aparicio T, Layese R, Hemery F, Tournigand C, Paillaud E, De Angelis N, Quero L, Ganne N, Prat F, Pachev A, Galula G, Benderra MA, Canouï-Poitrine F. The 10-month mortality rate among older patients treated for digestive system cancer during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: The CADIGCOVAGE multicentre cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101443. [PMID: 36709553 PMCID: PMC9883010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a dramatic impact on cancer diagnosis and care pathways. Here, we assessed the mid-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults with cancer before, during and after the lockdown period in 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study of prospectively collected electronic health records. All adults aged 65 or over and having been newly treated for a digestive system cancer in our institution between January 2018 until August 2020 were enrolled. RESULTS Data on 7,881 patients were analyzed. Although the overall 10-month mortality rate was similar in 2020 vs. 2018-2019, the mortality rate among for patients newly treated in the 2020 post-lockdown period was (after four months of follow-up) significantly higher. A subgroup analysis revealed higher mortality rates for (i) patients diagnosed in the emergency department during the pre-lockdown period, (ii) patients with small intestine cancer newly treated during the post-lockdown period, and (iii) patients having undergone surgery with curative intent during the post-lockdown period. However, when considering individuals newly treated during the lockdown period, we observed lower mortality rates for (i) patients aged 80 and over, (ii) patients with a biliary or pancreatic cancer, and (iii) patients diagnosed in the emergency department. DISCUSSION There was no overall increase in mortality among patients newly treated in 2020 vs. 2018-2019. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the consequences of the pandemic. A subgroup analysis revealed significant intergroup differences in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, F-75010 Paris, France; Université de Paris, F-75000 Paris, France.
| | - Richard Layese
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health and Clinical Research department (URC Mondor), F-94010 Créteil, France; Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB U955, F-94000 Creteil, France
| | - François Hemery
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Medical Information Departement, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB U955, F-94000 Creteil, France; AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Geriatric Department, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Nicola De Angelis
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Digestive Surgery, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Université de Paris, F-75000 Paris, France; AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Radiotherapy Department, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Ganne
- AP-HP, Avicenne Hospital, Hepatology Department, F-93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Fredéric Prat
- Université de Paris, F-75000 Paris, France; AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Endoscopy Department, F-92110 Clichy, France
| | - Atanas Pachev
- AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Radiology Department, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Gilles Galula
- AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Medical Oncology, F-75020 Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health and Clinical Research department (URC Mondor), F-94010 Créteil, France; Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB U955, F-94000 Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baseline Cytokine Profile Identifies a Favorable Outcome in a Subgroup of Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020335. [PMID: 36851213 PMCID: PMC9959285 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer is frequently associated with poor clinical conditions that may limit therapeutic options. Regorafenib is a small molecule approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, but it is hampered by significative toxicities. Moreover, only a relatively limited number of patients benefit from the treatment. Therefore, the identification of reliable markers for response is an unmet need. Eighteen cytokines, selected based on their prevalent Th1 or Th2 effects, were collected. Peripheral blood samples were gathered at baseline in 25 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib. Data extracted have been linked to progression-free survival. ROC identified the best cytokines associated with outcome. The relative value of the selected cytokines was determined by PCA. Data analysis identified 8 cytokines (TGF-β, TNF-α, CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-21), used to create a signature (TGF-β, TNF-α high; CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-21 low) corresponding to patients with a significantly longer progression-free survival. This report suggests that the analysis of multiple cytokines might identify a cytokine signature related to a patient's outcome that is able to recognize patients who will benefit from treatment. If confirmed, future studies, also based on different drugs, using this approach and including larger patient populations, might identify a signature allowing the a priori identification of patients to be treated.
Collapse
|
4
|
Guittet L, Quipourt V, Aparicio T, Carola E, Seitz JF, Paillaud E, Lievre A, Boulahssass R, Vitellius C, Bengrine L, Canoui-Poitrine F, Manfredi S. Should we screen for colorectal cancer in people aged 75 and over? A systematic review - collaborative work of the French geriatric oncology society (SOFOG) and the French federation of digestive oncology (FFCD). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:17. [PMID: 36604640 PMCID: PMC9817257 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10418-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have done a systematic literature review about CRC Screening over 75 years old in order to update knowledge and make recommendations. METHODS PUBMED database was searched in October 2021 for articles published on CRC screening in the elderly, and generated 249 articles. Further searches were made to find articles on the acceptability, efficacy, and harms of screening in this population, together with the state of international guidelines. RESULTS Most benefit-risk data on CRC screening in the over 75 s derived from simulation studies. Most guidelines recommend stopping cancer screening at the age of 75. In private health systems, extension of screening up to 80-85 years is, based on the life expectancy and the history of screening. Screening remains effective in populations without comorbidity given their better life-expectancy. Serious adverse events of colonoscopy increase with age and can outweigh the benefit of screening. The great majority of reviews concluded that screening between 75 and 85 years must be decided case by case. CONCLUSION The current literature does not allow Evidence-Based Medicine propositions for mass screening above 75 years old. As some subjects over 75 years may benefit from CRC screening, we discussed ways to introduce CRC screening in France in the 75-80 age group. IRB: An institutional review board composed of members of the 2 learned societies (SOFOG and FFCD) defined the issues of interest, followed the evolution of the work and reviewed and validated the report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Guittet
- grid.412043.00000 0001 2186 4076Public Health Unit, CHU Caen NormandieNormandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE, Caen, France
| | - Valérie Quipourt
- grid.31151.37Geriatrics Department and Coordination Unit in Oncogeriatry in Burgundy, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Carola
- grid.418090.40000 0004 1772 4275Geriatric Oncology Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Public du Sud de L’Oise, Bd Laennec, 60100 Creil, France
| | - Jean-François Seitz
- grid.411266.60000 0001 0404 1115Department of Digestive Oncology & Gastroenterology, CHU Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM) & Aix-Marseille-Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Elena Paillaud
- grid.414093.b0000 0001 2183 5849Geriatric Oncology Unit, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, inAP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Astrid Lievre
- grid.414271.5Department of Gastroenterology, INSERM U1242 “Chemistry Oncogenesis Stress Signaling”, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, FFCD France
| | - Rabia Boulahssass
- grid.410528.a0000 0001 2322 4179Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG), PACA Est CHU de NICE, France; FHU ONCOAGE, Nice, France
| | - Carole Vitellius
- grid.411147.60000 0004 0472 0283Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France ,grid.7252.20000 0001 2248 3363HIFIH Laboratory UPRES EA3859, Angers University, SFR 4208, Angers, France
| | - Leila Bengrine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Florence Canoui-Poitrine
- grid.412116.10000 0004 1799 3934Public Health Unit, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Sylvain Manfredi
- grid.31151.37Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Dijon, INSERM U123-1 University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, FFCD (French Federation of Digestive Cancer), Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Etienne PL, Barbier E, Mineur L, Desgrippes R, Guérin-Meyer V, Hocine F, Martin J, Le Brun-Ly V, Cretin J, Desramé J, Rinaldi Y, Cany L, Falandry C, Lefevre LB, Marous M, Terrebonne E, Mosser L, Turpin J, Turpin A, Bauguion L, Reichling C, Van den Eynde M, Carola E, Hiret S. Preliminary tolerance analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients after resection of stage III colon cancer from the PRODIGE 34-FFCD randomized trial. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 55:541-548. [PMID: 36115817 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon adenocarcinoma mainly occurs in older patients. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival after stage III colon cancer resection, but this improvement was not demonstrated in older patients. METHODS The purpose of ADAGE-PRODIGE 34, randomized open phase III trial is to compare in patients over 70 years oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with fluoropyrimidine alone in fit patients (Group 1) and fluoropyrimidine with observation in frail patients (Group 2) after resection of stage III colon adenocarcinoma. We report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first patients enrolled. RESULTS The analysis was conducted on 491 patients (378 in Group 1 and 113 in Group 2). Patients in Group 2 were older and showed more frailty criteria than those in Group 1. Cumulative grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Group 1 or with fluoropyrimidine in Group 2 than in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine in Group 1. At least one course was deferred in more than half of the patients in all groups. Early treatment cessation was more frequent in Group 2. CONCLUSION No safety concerns were raised for the continuation of accrual. The frailty criteria distribution suggests that the investigator's evaluation for group allocation was accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CHU Saint Louis, APHP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, Reims, France
| | - Pierre-Luc Etienne
- Centre Armoricain de Radiothérapie, Imagerie, Oncologie, et Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor, Plérin, France
| | - Emilie Barbier
- Biostatistic department, Burgundy University, INSERM U866, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Mineur
- Oncology department, Clinique Saint Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Romain Desgrippes
- Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CH Saint-Malo, Saint-Malo, France
| | | | | | - Jean Martin
- Oncology department, Clinique François Chenieux, Limoges, France
| | | | | | | | - Yves Rinaldi
- Hepato Gastroenterology department, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Cany
- Radiotherapy and Oncology department, Polyclinique Francheville, Perigueux, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Geriatry department CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France; Laboratoire CarMeN de l'Université de Lyon, Inserm U1060, INRA U1397, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA Lyon, UCOGIR- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Ouest - Guyane
| | | | | | - Eric Terrebonne
- Gastroenterology department, CHU Haut Lévèque, Pessac, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Sandrine Hiret
- Medical Oncology department, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aparicio T, Layese R, Hemery F, Tournigand C, Paillaud E, De Angelis N, Quero L, Ganne N, Prat F, Pachev A, Galula G, Benderra MA, Canouï-Poitrine F. Effect of lockdown on digestive system cancer care amongst older patients during the first wave of COVID-19: The CADIGCOVAGE multicentre cohort study. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:10-18. [PMID: 34654679 PMCID: PMC8487788 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a dramatic impact on cancer diagnosis and treatment. Most patients newly diagnosed with digestive system cancer are aged 65 and over. METHODS We performed a retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study based on prospectively collected electronic health records. All adults aged 65 or over and having been newly treated for a digestive system cancer between January 2018 until August 2020 were enroled. RESULTS Data on 7882 patients were analysed. The first COVID-19 lockdown period led to a 42.4% decrease in newly treated digestive system cancers, and the post-lockdown period was associated with a 17% decrease. The decrease in newly treated digestive system cancer did not differ as a function of age, sex, comorbidities, primary tumour site, and disease stage. The proportion of patients admitted to an emergency department increased during the lockdown period. We do not observe a higher 3-month mortality rate in 2020, relative to the corresponding calendar periods in 2018 and 2019. CONCLUSION To avoid a decrease in newly treated cancers during future lockdown periods, access to healthcare will have to be modified. Although 3-month mortality did not increase in any of the patient subgroups, the 2020 cohort must be followed up for long-term mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- AP-HP, Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris F-75010, France,Université de Paris, Paris F-75010, France,Corresponding author at: AP-HP, Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris F-75010, France
| | - Richard Layese
- AP-HP, Public Health and Clinical Research Department, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil F-94010, France,INSERM, IMRB U955, CEpiA Team, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil F-94000, France
| | - François Hemery
- AP-HP, Medical Information Department, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil F-94010, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- INSERM, IMRB U955, CEpiA Team, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil F-94000, France,AP-HP, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Geriatric Department, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris F-75015, France
| | - Nicola De Angelis
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Digestive Surgery, Créteil F-94010, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Université de Paris, Paris F-75010, France,AP-HP, Radiotherapy Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris F-75010, France
| | - Nathalie Ganne
- AP-HP, Hepatology Department, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny F-93000, France
| | - Fredéric Prat
- Université de Paris, Paris F-75010, France,AP-HP, Endoscopy Department, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy F-92110, France
| | - Atanas Pachev
- AP-HP, Radiology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris F-75010, France
| | - Gilles Galula
- AP-HP, Medical Oncology, Tenon Hospital, Paris F-75020, France
| | | | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- AP-HP, Public Health and Clinical Research Department, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil F-94010, France,INSERM, IMRB U955, CEpiA Team, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil F-94000, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang H, Hu H, Huang R, Guan Z, Zheng M, Xu C, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhang W, Yu L, Jin Y, Tang Q, Wang G, Wang X. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study. Updates Surg 2021; 74:599-607. [PMID: 34370279 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01143-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Whether natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) could provide beneficial effects in treating elderly patients is still under debate. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of transanal NOSES with conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection (LA) in elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A retrospective analysis from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Outcomes related to surgery, body image, quality of life, anal function and long-term survival were compared between the two groups with the propensity-score matching (PSM) method. After PSM, 78 patients were successfully compared. Patients with NOSES had faster gastrointestinal function recovery (P = 0.028), less postoperative complications (P = 0.025), lower pain scores on days 1, 3 and 5 after surgery (P < 0.001). The body image score (P < 0.001) and cosmetic score (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the NOSES group than the LA group at 1 month after surgery. Patients with NOSES posed better global health status (P < 0.001), role function (P = 0.009), emotional function (P = 0.011) and social function (P = 0.011) at 3 months after surgery. Moreover, NOSES showed non inferiority in anal function 6 months after surgery. No significant difference could be found regarding to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM). In elderly CRC patients, NOSES harbored favorable postoperative outcomes, excellent cosmetic properties and better quality of life. Besides, anal function and long-term outcomes of NOSES can be sure for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Hanqing Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Rui Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Zilong Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Mingyu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Chao Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Zhengliang Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yuliuming Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Weiyuan Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Lei Yu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yinghu Jin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qingchao Tang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Guiyu Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hiroi S, Miguchi M, Ikeda S, Nakahara H, Shinozaki K, Nishisaka T, Egi H, Itamoto T. Capecitabine Plus Bevacizumab for Cardiac Metastasis of Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review. In Vivo 2021; 34:3413-3419. [PMID: 33144449 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Right ventricular cardiac metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and clinically silent. There is no standardised treatment. To date, only twelve cases have been reported in the literature. This is a case report and literature review of right ventricular cardiac metastasis from CRC. CASE REPORT A 75-year-old woman with a history of CRC treated with sigmoidectomy followed by liver and lung metastasectomy presented with a right ventricle tumour. Biopsy showed metastatic adenocarcinoma not suitable for resection because multiple lung metastases coexisted. The metastases were controlled for a prolonged duration by chemotherapy with capecitabine plus bevacizumab. According to the review of 13 cases, the median age of metastatic CRC that involves the right ventricle is 71 years and the primary site is half the colon and rectum. Half of cases have non-cardiac metastases at cardiac metastasis diagnosis. Chemotherapy is more suitable than resection in cases with metastases other than heart because resection of the right ventricle has a high risk. CONCLUSION Cardiac right ventricular metastasis from CRC can be controlled by capecitabine plus bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sawako Hiroi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masashi Miguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Katsunori Shinozaki
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishisaka
- Department of Pathology Clinical Laboratory, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Egi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Itamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Conde E, Earl J, Crespo-Toro L, Blanco-Agudo C, Ramos-Muñoz E, Rodríguez-Serrano EM, Martínez Ávila JC, Salinas-Muñoz L, Serrano-Huertas S, Ferreiro R, Rodriguez-Garrote M, Sainz B, Massuti B, Alfonso PG, Benavides M, Aranda E, García-Bermejo ML, Carrato A. Biomarkers Associated with Regorafenib First-Line Treatment Benefits in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: REFRAME Molecular Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071710. [PMID: 33916610 PMCID: PMC8038427 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Biomarkers able to predict response and toxicity upon regorafenib therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) are critical for treatment choice, particularly relevant in fragile patients. Here, we validated for the first time 18 distinct microRNAs (miRNAs) detected in serum and primary tumor samples, three germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) genes, and low levels of Notch 1 expression in the primary tumor as predictive biomarkers of different features. Specifically, these markers were associated with a favorable response to treatment, disease stage, and relapse, as well as the appearance of asthenia. Therefore, these markers can be potentially useful biomarkers for patient stratification and for providing a more personalized and effective therapeutic strategy in fragile patients, while limiting the appearance of adverse effects. Abstract First-line treatment with regorafenib in frail metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients has shown some benefit. To accurately identify such patients before treatment, we studied blood biomarkers and primary tumor molecules. We unveiled serum microRNAs (miRNAs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in angiogenic-related genes, and Notch 1 expression as biomarkers associated with response or toxicity. MicroRNA array profiling and genotyping of selected SNPs were performed in the blood of fragile mCRC patients treated with regorafenib. Notch 1 and CRC-associated miRNA expression was also analyzed in tumors. High levels of miR-185-5p in serum, rs7993418 in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) gene, and Notch 1 expression in biopsies were associated with a favorable response to treatment. Serum levels of miR-126-3p and miR-152-3p and tumor expression of miR-92a-1-5p were associated with treatment toxicity, particularly interesting in patients exhibiting comorbidities, and high levels of miR-362-3p were associated with asthenia. Additionally, several miRNAs were associated with the presence of metastasis, local recurrence, and peritoneal metastasis. Besides, miRNAs determined in primary tumors were associated with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. The rs2305948 and rs699947 SNPs in VEGFR2 and VEGFA, respectively, were markers of poor prognosis correlating with locoregional relapse, a higher N stage, and metastatic shedding. In conclusion, VEGF and VEGFR SNPs, miRNAs, and Notch 1 levels are potential useful biomarkers for the management of advanced CRC under regorafenib treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Conde
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - Julie Earl
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Alcalá University, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.); (R.F.); (M.R.-G.); (A.C.)
- Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Lorena Crespo-Toro
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - Carolina Blanco-Agudo
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - Edurne Ramos-Muñoz
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - E. Macarena Rodríguez-Serrano
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - Jose Carlos Martínez Ávila
- Departamento de Matemática Aplicada y Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad San Pablo CEU, C/Julián Romea, 23, 28003 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Laura Salinas-Muñoz
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - Silvia Serrano-Huertas
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
| | - Reyes Ferreiro
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Alcalá University, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.); (R.F.); (M.R.-G.); (A.C.)
- Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Mercedes Rodriguez-Garrote
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Alcalá University, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.); (R.F.); (M.R.-G.); (A.C.)
- Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Bruno Sainz
- Department of Biochemistry, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas “Alberto Sols” (IIBM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), CSIC-UAM, C/Arzobispo Morcillo, 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Cancer Stem Cells and Fibroinflammatory Microenvironment Group, Chronic Diseases and Cancer Area 3-IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Bartomeu Massuti
- Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Pintor Baeza, 11, 03010 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Pilar García Alfonso
- Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28028 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Manuel Benavides
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
| | - Enrique Aranda
- Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Oncology Department, Instituto Maimonides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, University of Córdoba, IMIBIC, Av. Menéndez Pidal, s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
| | - María Laura García-Bermejo
- Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Group and Core Facility, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, RedinRen, Spain; (E.C.); (L.C.-T.); (C.B.-A.); (E.R.-M.); (E.M.R.-S.); (L.S.-M.); (S.S.-H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-913-368-075
| | - Alfredo Carrato
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Alcalá University, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.); (R.F.); (M.R.-G.); (A.C.)
- Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Prognostic factors for stage III colon cancer in patients 80 years of age and older. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:811-819. [PMID: 33528749 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03861-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oncological strategies in the elderly population are debated. The objective of this study was to assess the factors predictive of poor prognosis in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer. METHODS A retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data from 308 patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma who had undergone surgery between 2007 and 2014 was conducted. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of prognostic factors with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The 5-year survival rate was 34.4% (95% CI 27.1-39.8%) and Charlson comorbidity index was a significant predictor of death (p < 0.01). The presence of perineural invasion (p = 0.03) and incomplete resection (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with OS. The postoperative (30 days) mortality rate was 11.7%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with better OS (p < 0.001) independently of the regimens. Disease-free survival was significantly correlated with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.42-0.97, p = 0.034), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI 5; HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.05-2.48, p = 0.029), and venous and/or perineural invasion (HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.03-2.29, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION Age, comorbidities, tumor histology, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of prognosis in patients with stage III colon cancer. These data can be used to identify elderly patients with poor prognosis and to design future tailored randomized clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov No. NCT04526314. Date of registration 25 August 2020.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang D, Zhang J, Bai Z, Yang Y, Wang T, Jin L, Wang J, Wu G, Kou T, Zhang Z. Associations of Postoperative Complications Assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index with Long-Term Overall Survival in Elderly Patients after Radical CRC Resection. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15:1939-1949. [PMID: 33116448 PMCID: PMC7568923 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s271969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advancing age is associated with high incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and high rates of postoperative complications (POCs). However, the impact of of POC severity — evaluated by Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) or comprehensive complication index (CCI) — on long-term overall survival (OS) in elderly patients after radical CRC resection is not clear. Methods Elderly patients aged 65 years or more with CRC undergoing radical resection were retrospectively recruited. POC details were collected and evaluated using CDC grades and the CCI, blinded to patients’ other information. Risk factors for CDC grade ≥II POCs were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Effects of CDC grade II–IV POCs on long-term OS were analyzed via propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis followed by Kaplan–Meier curve plotting and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard regression adjusted for all potential confounders. The prognostic value of the CCI was also explored and compared with CDC grades. Results A total of 614 elderly patients were identified, of which 20, 106, 25, 11, and 13 cases experienced CDC grade I, II, III, IV, and V POCs, respectively. Higher age, female sex, coronary heart diseases, family history of tumors, preoperative anemia, high amount of bleeding during operation, and high positive dissected lymph–node ratio were found to be risk factors for CDC grade II–V POCs. After PSM analyses, CDC grade II–IV POCs were identified to be associated with poor long-term OS, which was also verified in the entire cohort. The CCI was also found to be significantly associated with decreased long-term OS and showed prognostic values similar to CDC grades. Conclusion Both CDC grades and the CCI can be used to evaluate POCs and are associated with long-term OS in elderly patients undergoing radical CRC resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinghui Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhigang Bai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Yingchi Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Tingting Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Lan Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Guocong Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Tiankuo Kou
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aparicio T, Canouï-Poitrine F, Caillet P, François E, Cudennec T, Carola E, Albrand G, Bouvier AM, Petri C, Couturier B, Phelip JM, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Paillaud E. Treatment guidelines of metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG). Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:493-505. [PMID: 32029404 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.12.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several guidelines dedicated to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Since 2013 no recent guidelines are specifically dedicated to older patients and based on a systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary Task Force with digestive oncologists, geriatricians and methodologists from the SoFOG was formed in 2016 to update recommendations on medical treatment of mCRC based on a systematic review of publications from 2000 to 2018. Search strategy has followed a standardized protocol from the formulation of clinical questions and definition of a search algorithm to the selection of complete articles for recommendations. RESULTS The four selected key questions were: For which older patients with mCRC can we considered: (1) Any chemotherapy, (2) Mono or poly-chemotherapy, (3) Anti-angiogenic therapy, (4) Other targeted therapy. Main recommendations for older patients are: (1) Omission of chemotherapy should be discussed with a geriatrician for patients with severe comorbidities, advanced dementia, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or severe loss of autonomy. (2) If tumor response is not the main aim, a mono-chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil combined with bevacizumab is recommended as first-line. (3) For patients with symptoms related to metastases or with a planned metastasis ablation, a doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibody in the context of a RAS wild type tumor is recommended as first-line. Preliminary data suggest that regorafenib may be used, in its registered indication, in patients under 80 with a performance status of 0 and no autonomy alterations and that trifluridine-tipiracil may be used with a tight supervising of hematological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Caillet
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Center, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Tristan Cudennec
- Department of Geriatry, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, University Versailles - Saint Quentin, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Elisabeth Carola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Public Sud de l'Oise Hospital, Creil, France
| | - Gilles Albrand
- Department of Geriatry, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR1231 EPICAD University of Burgundy Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Camille Petri
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Bérengère Couturier
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint-Etienne Hospital, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Single-arm phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of regorafenib monotherapy in patients over 70 with previously treated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma FFCD 1404 - REGOLD. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1255-1262. [PMID: 32334940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regorafenib significantly increases overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated but gives toxicities. OBJECTIVES to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at it's approved dose in the older population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter single-arm phase II enrolled patients ≥70 years old after the failure of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, anti-VEGF, and anti-EGFR treatment. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) 2 months after initiation of regorafenib (160 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off). RESULTS Forty-three patients were enrolled, with a median age of 77 years. The 2 months DCR was 31.4% in the 35 evaluable patients. For the 42 patients that received at least one dose of regorafenib, median progression-free survival and OS were 2.2 and 7.5 months. The median time to autonomy degradation and quality of life degradation was 3.1 and 3.2 months, respectively. A grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events was observed in 35/42 patients, notably: fatigue (45.2%), hand-foot skin reaction (19.0%), hypertension (21.4%), and diarrhea (7.1%). There is a trend to achieve DCR in patients ≤80 years and a trend to discontinue the study due to toxicity in patients with ECOG ≥1, over 80 years and with impaired baseline autonomy. CONCLUSION Treatment with regorafenib in pretreated patients ≥70 years is feasible and demonstrate similar efficacy that was observed in previous studies in young patients. Fatigue is the most frequent severe adverse event. However, caution should be taken for older patients with ECOG ≥1, over 80 years, and with impaired baseline autonomy.
Collapse
|
14
|
de’Angelis N, Baldini C, Brustia R, Pessaux P, Sommacale D, Laurent A, Le Roy B, Tacher V, Kobeiter H, Luciani A, Paillaud E, Aparicio T, Canuï-Poitrine F, Liuu E. Surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases in older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230914. [PMID: 32320417 PMCID: PMC7176093 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The present study explored the existing literature to describe the outcomes of surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases (mCRC) in older patients. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published since 2000 that investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of regional treatments (surgical or non-surgical) for mCRC in patients aged ≥65 years. Pooled data analyses were conducted by calculating the risk ratio (RR), mean differences (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) between older and younger patients or between two different approaches in older patients. Results After screening 266 articles, 29 were included in this review. These studies reported the outcomes of surgery (n = 19) and non-surgical local ablation treatments (n = 3) for CRC metastases in older vs. younger patients or compared the outcomes of different interventions in older patients (n = 7). When comparing older vs. younger patients undergoing liver surgery for mCRC, pooled data analysis showed higher postoperative mortality [RR = 2.53 (95%CI: 2.00–3.21)] and shorter overall survival [HR = 1.17 (95%CI: 1.07–1.18)] in older patients, whereas no differences in operative outcomes, postoperative complications and disease-free survival were found. When comparing laparoscopy vs. open surgery for liver resection in older mCRC patients, laparoscopy was associated with fewer postoperative complications [RR = 0.27 (95%CI: 0.10–0.73)]. Conclusion Liver resection for mCRC should not be disregarded a priori in older patients, who show similar operative and postoperative outcomes as younger patients. However, clinicians should consider that they are at increased risk of postoperative mortality and have a worse overall survival, which may reflect comorbidities and frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Capucine Baldini
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Hepato-biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Digestive, and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Université de Strasbourg, and U1110 Inserm, Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Strasbourg, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Departement of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Hicham Kobeiter
- Departement of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Departement of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Elena Paillaud
- Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Florence Canuï-Poitrine
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Evelyne Liuu
- Department of Geriatrics, CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers University Hospital, Grand Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ohta T, Kato T, Kawakami H, Miyake Y, Goto M, Iwamoto S, Otsuji T, Nakamura M, Sugimoto N, Okamura S, Kotaka M, Tsujie M, Tokunaga Y, Mishima H, Hata T, Shimokawa T, Kurokawa Y, Satoh T. Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin plus bevacizumab for chemotherapy-naïve older or frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (OGSG 0802). Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1291-1298. [PMID: 32219630 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01656-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older or frail patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We here assessed the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-leucovorin plus bevacizumab in such patients. METHODS The study (OGSG 0802) was designed as a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Eligible patients had mCRC and at least one of the following: an age of ≥ 65 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2, a serum albumin level of ≤ 3.5 g/dL, incompatibility with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, and a history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy. Patients received 5-FU (600 mg/m2) and l-leucovorin (200 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 together with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Forty-one patients were enrolled and eligible. Median age was 76 years (range 56-90 years), and 51% of patients had a performance status of 0. The ORR was 36.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1-53.1%], median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.4-17.7 months), and median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 19.9 months-not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (10%), leukopenia (7%), and mucositis/stomatitis (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION Weekly 5-FU-leucovorin with biweekly bevacizumab may be a tolerable and effective treatment option for older or frail patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Ohta
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kato
- Department of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
| | - Yasuhiro Miyake
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Goto
- Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | | | - Toshio Otsuji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongo Hospital, Yamatotakada, Japan
| | - Masato Nakamura
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Naotoshi Sugimoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shu Okamura
- Department of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | | | - Masaki Tsujie
- Department of Surgery, Tondabayashi Hospital, Tondabayashi, Japan
| | - Yukihiko Tokunaga
- Department of Surgery, Japan Post Kyoto Teishin Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Taishi Hata
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Toshio Shimokawa
- Department of Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang PF, Wen F, Zhou J, Huang JX, Zhou KX, Wu QJ, Wang XY, Zhang MX, Liao WT, Li Q. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 22:103-110. [PMID: 31062173 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02114-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine plus bevacizumab compared with capecitabine alone in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) from a Chinese societal perspective. METHODS A decision-analytic Markov model was conducted to simulate the process of metastatic CRC. Three distinct health states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease and death were included. Clinical data were derived from the AVEX trial. Health effectiveness was denoted in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health utilities were derived from previously published studies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was regarded as the primary endpoint and willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at $26,753.37/QALY (3 × per capita GDP of China, 2017). One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to explore the parameters uncertainty in the study. RESULTS Over a 10-year life horizon, capecitabine plus bevacizumab gained 1.14 QALYs at an average cost of $21,609.48, while the effectiveness and cost of capecitabine group were 0.99 QALYs and $7274.83, respectively. The ICER between the two groups was $95,564.33/QALY. Parameters that mostly influenced the results of the model were utility of PFS state, duration of PFS state for capecitabine plus bevacizumab, total cost of PFS state for capecitabine plus bevacizumab and price of bevacizumab. The probabilities of capecitabine plus bevacizumab and capecitabine as the dominant option were 0% and 100% at the WTP threshold of $26,753.37/QALY. CONCLUSIONS The results of the study showed that capecitabine plus bevacizumab is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment option for elderly patients with metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P-F Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - F Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - J Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - J-X Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - K-X Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Q-J Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - X-Y Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - M-X Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - W-T Liao
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Q Li
- Department of Medical Oncology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. .,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Taieb J, Maillard E, Kirscher S, Etienne PL, Faroux R, Khemissa Akouz F, El Hajbi F, Locher C, Rinaldi Y, Lecomte T, Lavau-Denes S, Baconnier M, Oden-Gangloff A, Genet D, Paillaud E, Retornaz F, François E, Bedenne L. Bevacizumab+chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in elderly patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial-PRODIGE 20 study results. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:133-138. [PMID: 29045659 PMCID: PMC5834151 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic colorectal cancer frequently occurs in elderly patients. Bevacizumab in combination with front line chemotherapy (CT) is a standard treatment but some concern raised about tolerance of bevacizumab for these patients. The purpose of PRODIGE 20 was to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of bevacizumab according to specific end points in this population. Patients and methods Patients aged 75 years and over were randomly assigned to bevacizumab + CT (BEV) versus CT. LV5FU2, FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimen were prescribed according to investigator’s choice. The composite co-primary end point, assessed 4 months after randomization, was based on efficacy (tumor control and absence of decrease of the Spitzer QoL index) and safety (absence of severe cardiovascular toxicities and unexpected hospitalization). For each arm, the treatment will be consider as inefficient if 20% or less of the patients met the efficacy criteria and not safe if 40% or less met the safety criteria. Results About 102 patients were randomized (51 BEV and 51 CT), median age was 80 years (range 75–91). Primary end point was met for efficacy in 50% and 58% and for safety in 61% and 71% of patients in BEV and CT, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months in BEV and 7.8 months in CT. Median overall survival was 21.7 months in BEV and 19.8 months in CT. The 36-month overall survival rate was 27% in BEV and 10.1% in CT. Severe toxicities grade 3/4 were mainly non-hematologic toxicities (80.4% in BEV, 63.3% in CT). Conclusion Bevacizumab combined with CT was safe and efficient. Both arms met the primary safety and efficacy criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Aparicio
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Saint Louis, APHP, Paris, France.,Université Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - O Bouché
- Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - J Taieb
- Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
| | - E Maillard
- Statistics Department, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - S Kirscher
- Oncology Department, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - P-L Etienne
- Oncology Department, CARIO, HPCA, Plérin, France
| | - R Faroux
- Gastroenterology Department, CHG Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | | | - F El Hajbi
- Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - C Locher
- Gastroenterology Department, CH Meaux, Meaux, France
| | - Y Rinaldi
- Gastroenterology Departement, Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
| | - T Lecomte
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Trousseau, Tours, France
| | | | - M Baconnier
- Gastroenterology Department, CH Annecy Genevois, Pringy, France
| | - A Oden-Gangloff
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - D Genet
- Oncology Department, Clinique Chenieux, Limoges, France
| | - E Paillaud
- Geriatric Department, CHU Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - F Retornaz
- Geriatric Department, Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
| | - E François
- Gastroenterology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - L Bedenne
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Le Bocage, INSERM U 866, Dijon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
de'Angelis N, Abdalla S, Bianchi G, Memeo R, Charpy C, Petrucciani N, Sobhani I, Brunetti F. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:1334-1345. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Solafah Abdalla
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Giorgio Bianchi
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Chirurgia Generale e Trapianto di Fegato M Rubino, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Cecile Charpy
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
- Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Niccolo Petrucciani
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Iradj Sobhani
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
- EA7375 (EC2M3 Research Team), Université Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC)-Val de Marne, Creteil, France
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lund CM, Vistisen KK, Dehlendorff C, Rønholt F, Johansen JS, Nielsen DL. Age-dependent differences in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the DISCO study. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1445-1454. [PMID: 30375911 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1531299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES First-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is effective and feasible in selected older patients. We investigated age-dependent differences in treatment and outcomes in patients with mCRC in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of 654 patients with mCRC referred to first-line chemotherapy in 2008-2014. Patients were divided into two age groups: 50-69 and ≥70 (older patients). Binary outcomes were analyzed by logistic regression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression, CRC-specific and other-cause mortality with Fine and Gray proportional hazard model for the sub-distribution of a competing risk. RESULTS After adjusting for performance status (PS) and comorbidity, older patients were more likely to receive monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.52-17.91), lower doses, and no additional targeted therapy (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.28-2.78) than younger patients. Yet, older patients experienced more toxicity and hospitalizations (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). Among those treated, older patients had shorter PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-1.57), but after adjusting for PS and comorbidity, PFS was similar. No significant difference was found in CRC mortality (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.95-1.40) between age groups. Poor PS was associated with shorter OS and PFS and higher CRC mortality. CONCLUSIONS In the DISCO study, older patients with mCRC received less aggressive first-line chemotherapy. Yet, they experienced more toxicity. Younger and older patients had similar CRC mortality. Shorter PFS and higher CRC mortality were observed in patients with poor PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia M. Lund
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Kirsten K. Vistisen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Christian Dehlendorff
- Department of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Finn Rønholt
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Julia S. Johansen
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte L. Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gouverneur A, Claraz P, Rousset M, Arnaud M, Fourrier-Réglat A, Pariente A, Aparicio T, Miremont-Salamé G, Noize P. Comparative Safety of Targeted Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer between Elderly and Younger Patients: a Study Using the International Pharmacovigilance Database. Target Oncol 2018; 12:805-814. [PMID: 29022151 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0529-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasingly treated using targeted therapies. Post-marketing safety of these agents is understudied, especially in the elderly. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare, according to age, the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of targeted therapies used for mCRC in real life. PATIENTS AND METHODS An extraction of VigiBase, which contains World Health Organization individual case safety reports (ICSRs), was performed. All ADR reports with aflibercept, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, or regorafenib used in CRC were considered. For all drugs, chi-square tests were used to compare frequencies of serious ADRs between patients aged ≥75 and <75 years. For selected ADRs and each drug, the drug-ADR association compared to other anticancer drugs was estimated through the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) in both age groups. RESULTS There were 21,565 ICSRs included, among which 74% were serious and 11% were fatal. Median age was 64 years (Inter Quartile Range = 56-71) and 15% of patients were aged ≥75; 57% were male. Serious ICSRs accounted for 47,292 ADRs. Neutropenia was not more reported in elderly for all drugs while diarrhea was more reported in elderly for panitumumab. Cardiac disorders were more reported in elderly patients, in particular heart failure, especially for bevacizumab, cetuximab, and regorafenib, as were respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders. Most of PRR were not different between the two groups, except encephalopathies, which were significantly associated with bevacizumab in the elderly only. CONCLUSIONS ADRs related to targeted therapies used for mCRC treatment were different across age groups; yet, not systematically more reported or worse in elderly patients. Selected elderly patients could, therefore, be treated with these targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandine Gouverneur
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. .,Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. .,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Pauline Claraz
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marine Rousset
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mickaël Arnaud
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Annie Fourrier-Réglat
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antoine Pariente
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, F-75010, Paris, France
| | - Ghada Miremont-Salamé
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pernelle Noize
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team, Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Francois E, Retornaz F, Barbier E, Taieb J, Kirscher S, Etienne PL, Faroux R, Khemissa Akouz F, El Hajbi F, Locher C, Rinaldi Y, Lecomte T, Lavau-Denes S, Baconnier M, Oden-Gangloff A, Genet D, Bedenne L, Paillaud E, Zawadi MA, Volet J, Cavaglione G, Lepere C, Rougier P, Zaanan A, Besson D, Fawzi KS, Adenis A, Gatineau-Sailliant G, Brezault C, Coriat R, Tougeron D, Hautefeuille V, Chone L, Molin Y, Seitz JF, Le Tallec VJ, Ben Abdelghani M, Villing AL, Aouakli A, Sebbagh V, Bedjaoui A, Mitry E, Carola E, Boulat O, Queuniet AM, Capitain O, Jouve JL, Baumgaertner I, Almaric F, Bonnetain F, Subtil F. Geriatric analysis from PRODIGE 20 randomized phase II trial evaluating bevacizumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in older patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2018; 97:16-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
22
|
Early onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Worrisome trends and oncogenic features. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:521-532. [PMID: 29615301 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Early onset colorectal cancers, defined as arising before 50 years of age, are a growing health hazard in western and eastern countries alike. The incidence of colon and rectal cancers in young individuals is projected to increase by as much as 90% and 140%, respectively, by 2030. Although several known cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking, alcohol, dietary habits) have been investigated, there is no single compelling explanation for this epidemiological trend. While some early onset colorectal cancers have been associated with germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes, genetic syndromes are implicated in only a fraction of these cancers (20%) and do not explain the rising incidence. Colorectal neoplasms develop through microsatellite instability or chromosomal instability pathways, with most of the early onset colorectal cancers exhibiting microsatellite stable phenotypes. Genome-wide hypomethylation is a feature of a subgroup of early onset cancers, which appears to be correlated with chromosomal instability and poor prognosis.
Collapse
|
23
|
Diao P, Langrand-Escure J, Garcia MA, Espenel S, Rehailia-Blanchard A, de Lavigerie B, Vial N, de Laroche G, Vallard A, Magné N. Radiotherapy of rectal cancer in elderly patients: Real-world data assessment in a decade. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:608-616. [PMID: 29409780 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.01.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 12/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There is paucity of data on the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in rectal cancer (RC) elderly patients. The objective was to identify management strategies and resulting outcomes in RC patients ≥70 years undergoing radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study included consecutive RC patients ≥70 years undergoing rectal radiotherapy. RESULTS From 2004-2015, 340 RC patients underwent pre-operative (n = 238; 70%), post-operative (n = 41, 12%), or exclusive (n = 61, 18%) radiotherapy, with a median age of 78.5 years old (range: 70-96). Radiotherapy protocols were tailored, with 54 different radiotherapy programs (alteration of the total dose, and/or fractionation, and/or volume). Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Acute and late grade 3-4 radio-induced toxicities were reported in 3.5% and 0.9% of patients. Metastatic setting (OR = 6.60, CI95% 1.47-46.03, p = 0.02), exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 5.08, CI95% 1.48-18.21, p = 0.009), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 6.42, CI95% 1.31-24.73, p = 0.01) were associated with grade ≥3 acute toxicities in univariate analysis. Exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 9.79, CI95% 2.49-43.18, p = 0.001) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 12.62, CI95% 2.05-71.26, p = 0.003) were independent predictive factors of grade ≥3 acute toxicities in multivariate analysis. A complete pathological response was achieved in 12 out of 221 pre-operative patients (5.4%). Age, tumor stage, and surgery were independent predictive factors of survival in multivariate analysis. At end of follow-up, 7.1% of patients experienced local relapse. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy for RC in elderly patients appeared safe and manageable, perhaps due to the tailoring of radiotherapy protocols. Tailored management resulted in acceptable rate of local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Julien Langrand-Escure
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Max-Adrien Garcia
- Public Health Department, Hygée Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Sophie Espenel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Amel Rehailia-Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Blandine de Lavigerie
- Department of Geriatric Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Nicolas Vial
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Guy de Laroche
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Alexis Vallard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Petrioli R, Chirra M, Messuti L, Fiaschi AI, Savelli V, Martellucci I, Francini E. Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib With 2/1 Schedule for Patients ≥ 75 Years With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) After Failure of 2 Lines of Chemotherapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:307-312. [PMID: 29548772 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2017] [Revised: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the CORRECT (patients with metastatic COloRectal Cancer treated with REgorafenib or plaCebo after failure of standard Therapy) trial, regorafenib was proven to extend survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after all available therapies. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 54% of patients, and data on the activity and tolerability of regorafenib in elderly patients were scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an alternative schedule, 2-week-on treatment and 1 week-off (2/1 schedule), of regorafenib for elderly patients with mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients ≥ 75 years with mCRC who progressed after oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy received regorafenib on a 2/1 schedule. Potentially frail subjects were identified by G8 screening tool and excluded. The 2-month disease-control rate was the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate. RESULTS Between February 2014 and May 2017, 23 patients with mCRC were recruited at our institution. No partial or complete responses were observed, and the stable disease and disease-control rate were 52.2%. The median PFS was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8-6.3 months), and the median OS was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 6.9-10.6 months). Adverse events were uncommon, and the most frequent grade 3 toxicity adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (9%) and fatigue (9%). Toxicity-related dose reductions and discontinuations occurred in 5 and 2 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Regorafenib administered with a modified 2/1 schedule to patients who were aged ≥ 75 years and non-frail with treatment-refractory mCRC seems to be tolerable and achieve encouraging results in terms of PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Petrioli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
| | - Martina Chirra
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Luciana Messuti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Anna Ida Fiaschi
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Vinno Savelli
- Department of Surgery and Bioengineering, Section of Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Ignazio Martellucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gouverneur A, Salvo F, Berdaï D, Moore N, Fourrier-Réglat A, Noize P. Inclusion of elderly or frail patients in randomized controlled trials of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 9:15-23. [PMID: 28844343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been modified since the launching of targeted therapies. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in elderly patients; their representation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is thus crucial. This study aimed to evaluate and quantify the inclusion of elderly/frail patients in RCTs of targeted therapies in mCRC. A systematic review using Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Database and ISI Web of Science was performed to identify all phase II/III RCTs of bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, regorafenib and aflibercept in mCRC until January 2015. Two reviewers independently performed studies selection, and data extraction. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42015016163). Among 1,369, identified publications, 54 RCTs were selected. Nine RCTs (17%) excluded elderly patients; median age of the included population was <65years old in 50 RCTs (93%). Twenty RCTs (37%) excluded frail patients, and many RCTs excluded patients with uncontrolled hypertension or heart failure, patients treated with specific drugs (mainly anticoagulants), and patients with inadequate creatinine clearance. Elderly/frail patients are underrepresented in RCTs studying targeted therapies in mCRC, and those elderly patients included in RCTs do not reflect well the general elderly population with mCRC because of the exclusion criteria. RCTs results concerning targeted therapies can be inferred only to relatively healthy elderly subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandine Gouverneur
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Francesco Salvo
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Driss Berdaï
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicholas Moore
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Annie Fourrier-Réglat
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Pernelle Noize
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yamano T, Yamauchi S, Kimura K, Babaya A, Hamanaka M, Kobayashi M, Fukumoto M, Tsukamoto K, Noda M, Tomita N, Sugihara K, Takemasa I, Hakamada K, Kameyama H, Takii Y, Hase K, Kotake K, Watanabe T, Takahashi K, Kanemitsu Y, Itabashi M, Yano H, Yasuno M, Hasegawa H, Hashiguchi Y, Masaki T, Watanabe M, Maeda K, Komori K, Sakai Y, Ohue M, Akagi Y. Influence of age and comorbidity on prognosis and application of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly Japanese patients with colorectal cancer: A retrospective multicentre study. Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
27
|
Geriatric factors analyses from FFCD 2001-02 phase III study of first-line chemotherapy for elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2017; 74:98-108. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|