Indicators of suboptimal tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Real-world clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategies in patients with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease in Argentina: Data from the RISE-AR study

OBJECTIVE

Real-world evidence on the adoption of different pharmacological strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America is scarce. Herein, we describe real-world sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and different therapeutic approaches used in patients with IBD in Argentina.

METHODS

RISE AR (NCT03488030) was a multicenter, non-interventional study with a cross-sectional evaluation and a 3-year retrospective chart review conducted in Argentina. Adult patients with a previous diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) at least 6 months prior to enrollment were included.

RESULTS

This study included 246 patients with IBD (CD: 41%; UC: 59%), with a median age of 39.5 years (IQR 30.7-51.7) for CD and 41.9 years (33.3-55.3) for UC. Overall, 51.5% of CD patients had colonic disease involvement, while 45.5% of UC patients had extensive colitis. At enrollment, the overall use of biologics was high, especially in CD patients (CD: 73.2% vs. UC: 30.3%, p<0.001), while the use of immunosuppressants was similar (∼41%, p=1.000) for both diseases. IBD treatments ever prescribed and healthcare resources utilization during the retrospective period were (CD, UC): biologics: 79.2%, 33.8% (p<0.001); immunosuppressants: 65.3%, 58.6% (p=0.352); aminosalicylates: 62.4%, 97.9% (p<0.001); corticosteroids: 55.4%, 69.7% (p=0.031); surgery: 17.8%, 1.4% (p<0.001); and hospitalizations: 33.7%, 21.4% (p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of IBD patients, overall prescription patterns of conventional therapy were similar to reports elsewhere; however, biologic therapy use was high, especially in CD, consistent with disease behavior and possibly reflecting better access to care in referral centers. Interestingly, over half of CD patients presented colonic involvement.

HLA-DQA1*05 Allele Carriage and Anti-TNF Therapy Persistence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

Carriage of the HLA-DQA1*05 allele is associated with development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. However, ADA is not uniformly associated with treatment failure. We aimed to determine the impact of carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 allele on outcome of biologic therapy evaluated by drug persistence.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study of 877 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF therapy with HLA-DQA1*05 genotypes were generated by imputation from whole genome sequence using the HIBAG package, in R. Primary end point was anti-TNF therapy persistence, (time to therapy failure), segregated by HLA-DQA1*05 allele genotype and development of a risk score to predict anti-TNF therapy failure, incorporating HLA-DQA1*05 allele genotype status (LORisk score).

RESULTS

In all, 877 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy were included in our study; 543 (62%) had no copy, 281 (32%) one copy, and 53 (6%) 2 copies of HLA-DQA1*05 allele. Mean time to anti-TNF therapy failure in patients with 2 copies of HLA-DQA1*05 allele was significantly shorter compared with patients with 0 or 1 copy at 700 days' follow-up: 418 vs 541 vs 513 days, respectively (P = .012). Factors independently associated with time to anti-TNF therapy failure included carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 allele (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2, P = .02; female gender HR, 1.6, P < .001; UC phenotype HR, 1.4, P = .009; and anti-TNF therapy type [infliximab], HR, 1.5, P = .002). The LORisk score was significantly associated with shorter time to anti-TNF therapy failure (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Carriage of 2 HLA-DQA1*05 alleles is associated with less favorable outcomes for patients receiving anti-TNF therapy with shorter time to therapy failure. HLA-DQA1*05 genotype status in conjunction with clinical factors may aid in therapy selection in patients with IBD.

Suboptimal response to tumor necrosis factor antagonists in inflammatory bowel disease in Latin America: EXPLORE LATAM study

OBJECTIVE

Data on anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment and suboptimal response (SOR) among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in Latin America (LATAM) are scarce. This study evaluated the incidence and indicators of SOR to anti-TNF therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) from Argentina, Colombia and Mexico.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed retrospective analysis of data from LATAM patients of the EXPLORE study (NCT03090139) including adult patients with IBD who initiated anti-TNF therapy between March 2010 to March 2015. The cumulative incidence of SOR to first-line anti-TNF therapy was assessed. A physician survey to assess barriers to anti-TNF therapies was also carried out.

RESULTS

We included 185 IBD patients (UC/CD: 99/86) treated with first-line anti-TNF from Argentina (38 UC; 40 CD), Colombia (21 UC; 25 CD) and Mexico (40 UC; 21 CD). 36.4% of patients with UC and 46.5% of patients with CD experienced SOR to anti-TNF therapy during the median (interquartile range) observational period: 49.0 months (37.2-60.1) in UC, and 50.0 months (40.9-60.1) in CD. The most common indicator of SOR among patients was augmentation of non-biologic therapy (UC: 41.7%; CD: 35.0%). Affordability and late referral to IBD specialist care centers were the most common barriers to anti-TNF therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

SOR to anti-TNF therapy was common in LATAM IBD patients, where augmentation with non-biologic therapy represented the most frequent indicator of SOR across indications. Our findings contribute to the current evidence on the unmet needs associated with anti-TNF in LATAM.

A Current State of Proteomics in Adult and Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Search and Review

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are systemic immune-mediated conditions with predilection for the gastrointestinal tract and include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Despite the advances in the fields of basic and applied research, the etiopathogenesis remains largely unknown. As a result, only one third of the patients achieve endoscopic remission. A substantial portion of the patients also develop severe clinical complications or neoplasia. The need for novel biomarkers that can enhance diagnostic accuracy, more precisely reflect disease activity, and predict a complicated disease course, thus, remains high. Genomic and transcriptomic studies contributed substantially to our understanding of the immunopathological pathways involved in disease initiation and progression. However, eventual genomic alterations do not necessarily translate into the final clinical picture. Proteomics may represent a missing link between the genome, transcriptome, and phenotypical presentation of the disease. Based on the analysis of a large spectrum of proteins in tissues, it seems to be a promising method for the identification of new biomarkers. This systematic search and review summarize the current state of proteomics in human IBD. It comments on the utility of proteomics in research, describes the basic proteomic techniques, and provides an up-to-date overview of available studies in both adult and pediatric IBD.

Rates of clinical remission and inadequate response to advanced therapies among patients with ulcerative colitis in Germany

PURPOSE

Many patients treated for ulcerative colitis (UC) do not achieve clinical remission. This real-world study assessed clinical remission and inadequate response rates among patients with UC in Germany treated with advanced therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included patients with UC newly initiating advanced (index) therapy (anti-TNFα agents, vedolizumab, tofacitinib) from January 2017-September 2019 (index date). Included patients had data for ≥ 12 months before (baseline period) and after the index date (follow-up period). Remission was defined as a partial Mayo score ≤ 1. Indicators of inadequate response were: index therapy discontinuation; therapy adjustments (index therapy dose escalation; augmentation with non-advanced therapies; corticosteroid [CS] use during maintenance therapy); CS dependency (use for ≥ 12 weeks); and UC-related hospitalisation, surgery or emergency department visit. Time to first remission and inadequate response were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Among 149 patients with UC (median age: 40 years), 96 (64.4%) were biologic-naïve and 42 (28.2%) received CS at the index date. Within 12 months, 52 patients (47.2%) were in remission; of these, 13 patients (25.0%) received ≥ 1 therapy adjustment. At 12 months, 55 patients (37.6%) had ≥ 1 indicator of an inadequate response. Median time to remission was longer among biologic-experienced vs biologic-naïve patients (24 vs 7 months; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Over half of the patients were not in clinical remission after 12 months and more than one-third experienced inadequate response. One-quarter of patients in remission required therapy adjustments. Patients with UC require therapies that are more effective than those currently available to achieve better treatment outcomes.

The incidence of remission and indicators of inadequate response to advanced therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from medical charts in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

A considerable proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with advanced therapies do not achieve remission, even after one year of treatment, and suboptimal response to advanced therapies is frequently observed in clinical practice. This study aims to analyze clinical practice data in the United Kingdom (UK) and assess the rates of clinical remission and inadequate response with advanced therapies among patients with UC.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included patients with UC who initiated a new advanced therapy (i.e., adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, tofacitinib, or vedolizumab) between January 2017 and September 2019 from eight clinics across the UK. At least 12 months of data before and after starting an advanced therapy were required. Remission was assessed using components of the Mayo score. Inadequate response was defined by therapeutic adjustment or emergency treatment.

RESULTS

Among 238 patients included (female: 46.6%; median age: 42.0 years; median follow-up: 28.8 months), 178 patients (74.8%) were biologic-naïve. At 12 months, 87 patients (53.9%) had achieved remission (median time to remission: 7.6 months); although 29 (33.3%) among them had required therapeutic modifications to achieve remission. At 12 months, 105 patients (44.3%) had at least one indicator of an inadequate response (median time to first indicator of inadequate response: 18.0 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients did not achieve remission, and almost half of included patients had an inadequate response within 1 year after treatment initiation. More effective therapies are needed to effectively treat UC.

Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Dose Escalation and Treatment Switching in Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Currently approved biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis have well-established efficacy. However, many patients fail to respond or lose response, leading to dose escalation or treatment switching.

Objective

We sought to identify real-world evidence on dose escalation and treatment switching and associated clinical and economic outcomes among adults with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE (up to 26 August 2020), and conference proceedings (2017-2020) for studies in adults with ulcerative colitis to assess clinical response and remission, colectomy, adverse events, and economic outcomes related to dose escalation and treatment switching.

Results

In 56 studies, dose escalation and treatment switching involving infliximab and/or adalimumab were most frequently investigated. Rates of clinical response after dose escalation were 20-95% (1.8-36 months), clinical remission rates were 10-94% (1.8-36 months), colectomy rates were 0-33% (12-38 months), and adverse event rates were 0-18%. Treatment switching rates in 21 studies were 4-70% over 3-62 months, with switch due to loss of response rates of 4-35% over 12-62 months (7 studies). Up to 35% of patients underwent colectomy 12-120 weeks after switching, and 13-38% experienced adverse events. Data relating to economic outcomes were limited to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but demonstrated increased direct costs associated with both dose escalation and treatment switching.

Conclusion

Dose escalation and treatment switching are common with existing therapies. However, clinical response and remission rates vary, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve optimal clinical and economic outcomes. This highlights the need for more efficacious and durable treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

Treatment escalation and de-escalation decisions in Crohn's disease: Delphi consensus recommendations from Japan, 2021

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop criteria for treatment intensification in patients with (1) luminal Crohn's disease (CD), (2) CD with perianal disease and/or fistula, (3) CD with small bowel stenosis, (4) in the postoperative setting, and (5) for discontinuing or reducing the dose of treatment in patients with CD.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published since 1998 which may be relevant to the five defined topics. Results were assessed for relevant studies, with preference given to data from randomized, controlled studies. For each question, a core panel of 12 gastroenterologists defined the treatment target and developed statements, based on the literature, current guidelines, and relevant additional studies. The evidence supporting each statement was graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence (March 2009). A modified Delphi process was used to refine statements and gain agreement from 54 Japanese specialists at in-person and online meetings conducted between October 2020 and April 2021.

RESULTS

Seventeen statements were developed for treatment intensification in luminal CD (targeting endoscopic remission), six statements for treatment intensification in perianal/fistulizing CD (targeting healing of perianal lesions and complete closure of the fistula), six statements for treatment intensification in CD with small bowel stenosis (targeting resolution of obstructive symptoms), seven statements for treatment intensification after surgery (targeting endoscopic remission), and five statements for discontinuing or reducing the dose of treatment in patients with CD.

CONCLUSIONS

These statements provide guidance on how and when to intensify or de-intensify treatment for a broad spectrum of patients with CD.

Inadequate Response, Treatment Patterns, Health Care Utilization, and Associated Costs in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Retrospective Cohort Study Based on German Claims Data

BACKGROUND

Real-world data regarding response rates in ulcerative colitis treatment are rare, particularly for later lines of therapy. This study aimed to assess continuity of and changes to advanced therapies, as well as costs and specific indicators defining suboptimal therapy.

METHODS

German claims data were retrospectively analyzed (January 2014 to June 2019). Patients with ulcerative colitis initiating an advanced therapy (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab) were included. Inadequate response was indicated by therapy discontinuation, switch, escalation, augmentation, corticosteroid dependency, disease-related hospitalization, or surgery. Health care resource utilization (inpatient, outpatient, sick leaves, medication, aids, and remedies) and related costs were assessed from therapy initiation until discontinuation or loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 574 patients (median age, 39 years; female sex, 53.5%) who initiated advanced therapies, 458 (79.8%) received an antitumor necrosis factor therapy, 113 (19.7%) vedolizumab, and 3 (0.5%) tofacitinib. After 12 months, 75% had ≥1 indicator for suboptimal therapy. The median time to first indicated inadequate response was 4.8 months. Therapy discontinuation (38%), switching (26%), and prolonged use of steroids (36%) were common within the first year of treatment. In an unadjusted comparison, all-cause total costs per person-year were significantly higher in those who switched vs patients remaining on their therapy (€44,570 vs €36,807; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates a high prevalence of inadequate response to advanced therapies. Only 25% of patients showed adequate response within 12 months after therapy initiation. Frequent dose and treatment changes were observed. The economic impact of suboptimal therapy in ulcerative colitis is substantial, highlighting the ongoing need for improved treatment strategies.

Indicators of suboptimal response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients from China with inflammatory bowel disease: results from the EXPLORE study

Background

Prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in China. The EXPLORE study evaluated the incidence and indicators of suboptimal responses to first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). We present results for the mainland China subgroup.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed in adults with IBD at 10 centers in mainland China who initiated anti-TNF therapy between 01 March 2010 and 01 March 2015. The cumulative incidence of suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF therapy was assessed over 24 months using the Kaplan–Meier method. Indicators of suboptimal response were: dose escalation, discontinuation, augmentation with non-biologic therapy, or IBD-related surgery/hospitalization. At site initiation, a survey was conducted with participating physicians to identify barriers to anti-TNF use.

Results

Of 287 patients (72% male) examined, 16/35 (45.7%) with UC and 123/252 (48.8%) with CD experienced a suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF therapy at any point during the observation period (median 27.6 and 40.0 months, respectively). At 1 and 2 years post anti-TNF initiation, the cumulative incidence of suboptimal response was 51.4% and 75.7% for UC and 45.4% and 57.0% for CD, respectively. Median time to first suboptimal response was 7.2 months for UC and 14.3 months for CD. The most frequent indicator of suboptimal response was discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy (9/16, 56.3%) for UC and IBD-related hospitalization for CD (69/123, 56.1%) followed by augmentation with non-biologic therapy for both cohorts (5/16, 31.3% for UC and 28/123, 22.8% for CD). Dose escalation was the least frequent indicator of suboptimal response to anti-TNF therapy (CD: 4/123, 3.3%; UC: not cited as an indicator). The cumulative incidence of suboptimal response within 4 months of first-line anti-TNF therapy (primary non-response) was over 30% in both cohorts. Financial reasons and reimbursement were identified by surveyed physicians as the most common barriers to prescribing an anti-TNF therapy.

Conclusions

Over one-half of patients with IBD are at risk of experiencing a suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF therapy at 2 years post-initiation in China. This study highlights a substantial unmet need associated with anti-TNF therapies in China. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03090139).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-02074-z.

Sustained Crohn’s Disease Remission with an Exclusive Elemental and Exclusion Diet: A Case Report

The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn’s disease (CD), is increasing worldwide. Despite several new therapeutics to treat CD, many patients fail to respond to their medications and inevitably face surgical resection. While genetics plays a role in CD, environmental factors are potential triggers. Recent research from the past few years suggest that pro-inflammatory foods are associated with an increased risk of CD. Some studies have shown the benefit of including exclusion diets, such as the specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) and exclusive elemental diets, to induce CD remission, but published data is limited. This case study explores how an exclusive elemental and exclusion diet helped induce clinical and biochemical remission and radiologic healing in a young adult male who had failed to achieve remission using standard medical treatment. C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin, and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) served as objective markers of inflammation in this study.

Real-world treatment patterns and disease control over one year in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) with a remission-relapsing presentation and symptomatic exacerbations that have detrimental impacts on patient quality of life and are associated with a high cost burden, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. The Real-world Data of Moderate-to-Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Brazil (RISE BR) study was a noninterventional study designed to evaluate disease control, treatment patterns, disease burden and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe active IBD. We report findings from the prospective follow-up phase of the RISE BR study in patients with active UC or CD.

AIM

To describe the 12-mo disease evolution and treatment patterns among patients with active moderate-to-severe IBD in Brazil.

METHODS

This was a prospective, noninterventional study of adult patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD: Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥ 8, CD Activity Index ≥ 220), inadequate CD control (i.e., calprotectin > 200 µg/g or colonoscopy previous results), or active ulcerative colitis (UC: Partial Mayo score ≥ 5). Enrollment occurred in 14 centers from October 2016 to February 2017. The proportion of active IBD patients after 9-12 mo of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to mild or no activity and a summary of treatment initiation, discontinuation and dose changes were examined.

RESULTS

The study included 118 CD and 36 UC patients, with mean ± SD ages of 43.3 ± 12.6 and 44.9 ± 16.5 years, respectively. The most frequent drug classes at index were biologics for CD (62.7%) and 5-aminosalicylate derivates for UC patients (91.7%). During follow-up, 65.3% of CD and 86.1% of UC patients initiated a new treatment at least once. Discontinuations/dose changes occurred in 68.1% of CD patients [median 2.0 (IQR: 2-5)] and 94.3% of UC patients [median 4.0 (IQR: 3-7)]. On average, CD and UC patients had 4.4 ± 2.6 and 5.0 ± 3.3 outpatient visits, respectively. The median time to first mild or no activity was 319 (IQR: 239-358) d for CD and 320 (IQR: 288-358) d for UC patients. At 9-12 mo, 22.0% of CD and 20.0% of UC patients had active disease.

CONCLUSION

Although a marked proportion of active IBD patients achieved disease control within one year, the considerable time to achieve this outcome represents an unmet medical need of the current standard of care in a Brazilian real-world setting.

Frequency and Effectiveness of Empirical Anti-TNF Dose Intensification in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Loss of response to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies in inflammatory bowel disease occurs in a high proportion of patients. Our aim was to evaluate the loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, considered as the need for dose intensification (DI), DI effectiveness and the possible variables influencing its requirements. Bibliographical searches were performed.

SELECTION

prospective and retrospective studies assessing DI in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients treated for at least 12 weeks with an anti-TNF drug.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

studies using anti-TNF as a prophylaxis for the postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease or those where DI was based on therapeutic drug monitoring.

DATA SYNTHESIS

effectiveness by intention-to-treat (random effects model). Data were stratified by medical condition (ulcerative colitis vs. Crohn's disease), anti-TNF drug and follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-three studies (33,241 patients) were included. Overall rate of the DI requirement after 12 months was 28% (95% CI 24-32, I2 = 96%, 41 studies) in naïve patients and 39% (95% CI 31-47, I2 = 86%, 18 studies) in non-naïve patients. The DI requirement rate was higher both in those with prior anti-TNF exposure (p = 0.01) and with ulcerative colitis (p = 0.02). The DI requirement rate in naïve patients after 36 months was 35% (95% CI 28-43%; I2 = 98%; 18 studies). The overall short-term response and remission rates of empirical DI in naïve patients were 63% (95% CI 48-78%; I2 = 99%; 32 studies) and 48% (95% CI: 39-58%; I2 = 92%; 25 studies), respectively. The loss of response to anti-TNF agents-and, consequently, DI-occurred frequently in inflammatory bowel disease (approximately in one-fourth at one year and in one-third at 3 years). Empirical DI was a relatively effective therapeutic option.

Real-World Incidence of Suboptimal Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Background/Aims

Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have been widely used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC), the real-world incidence of suboptimal response to anti-TNF agents has not been thoroughly investigated, especially among Asians.

Methods

Using the Korean National Health Insurance database, we collected data on UC patients who initiated anti-TNF agents between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. We assessed suboptimal responses, including anti-TNF discontinuation or dose escalation, switching to other biologics, augmentation with a non-biologic therapy, and the requirement for colectomy.

Results

A total of 1,268 patients were included as new anti-TNF users (infliximab 713, adalimumab 433, golimumab 122). The proportion of patients who experienced at least one suboptimal response within 1 year among all patients was 63.5%, including 59.1%, 69.5%, and 68.0% of patients treated with infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, respectively. The cumulative incidences of at least one suboptimal response over time were 41.5%, 63.7%, 80.5%, and 87.1% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that adalimumab was associated with a higher risk of at least one suboptimal response (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.48), dose escalation (HR, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.97 to 6.38) and discontinuation (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.52) than infliximab. Golimumab was associated with a higher risk of switching to other biologics than infliximab (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.60).

Conclusions

More than half of Korean UC patients had suboptimal responses to anti-TNF agents within 1 year. UC patients treated with infliximab might be less prone to suboptimal responses than those treated with adalimumab or golimumab.

Long-term cost and complications of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis: a claims data analysis

OBJECTIVES

Use claims data to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had surgery and patients who did not.

METHODS

UC patients from a German health insurance were included between 01/01/2010-31/12/2017. Patients with proctocolectomy or colectomy between 01/07/2010 and 31/12/2014 were identified, and surgery date was set as index. For patients with IPAA, the last surgery in the 6 months was taken as index. Non-surgery patients received random index. After propensity score matching, UC-related HCRU and cost were observed for three years post-index.

RESULTS

Of 21,392 UC patients, 85 underwent surgery and 2655 did not. After matching, 76 were included in the surgery group and 114 in the non-surgery group. Matched cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics and mortality rates where high in both groups (21.1% and 29.0%, respectively). The percentage of patients with at least one hospitalization in the follow-up period was higher in the surgery (53.9%) compared to the non-surgery group (25.4%, p<0.001). In contrast, the number of outpatient prescriptions of UC-related drugs in the non-surgery group (11.2) was almost twice as large as in the surgery group (5.8, p<0.001). Hospitalization cost was 4.6 times higher in the surgery (1955.5€) than in the non-surgery group (419.6€, p<0.001). Medication cost was three times higher in the non-surgery group (6519€) compared to the surgery group (2151.7€, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and medical treatment, results show a considerable patient burden in UC from surgery complications or disease exacerbation in case of colectomy.

Incidence of suboptimal response to tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy in inflammatory bowel disease in newly industrialised countries: The EXPLORE study

BACKGROUND

Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in newly industrialised countries (NICs); however, data on suboptimal response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To assess incidence and indicators of suboptimal response to first anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients in NICs.

METHODS

A chart review was conducted in ten countries from Asia-Pacific (APAC), Latin America (LatAm), and Russia and the Middle East (RME) regions among patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), initiating anti-TNF therapy in 2010-2015. The cumulative incidence of suboptimal response to anti-TNF therapy was assessed using the following indicators: dose escalation or discontinuation, augmentation with non-biologic therapy, IBD-related hospitalization, or surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 1,674 patients (570 UC; 1,104 CD). At 24 months, 32.9% of UC (APAC: 45.1%; LatAm: 38.2%; RME: 23.8%) and 41.2% of CD patients (APAC: 54.1%; LatAm: 42.5%; RME: 29.5%) had experienced suboptimal response. The most frequent first indicator was non-biologic therapy augmentation in LatAm (41.7%), IBD-related hospitalization in RME (UC: 50.7%; CD:37.3%) and in APAC for CD (39.1%), and anti-TNF discontinuation in APAC for UC (38.3%).

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal response to anti-TNF agents is common in IBD patients in NICs. Observed regional differences in the incidence and indicators may reflect local practice and anti-TNF restrictions in IBD management.

NCT REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03090139.

Living with ulcerative colitis in Germany: a retrospective analysis of dose escalation, concomitant treatment use and healthcare costs

Aims: To investigate treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) using real-world German health insurance claims data.Materials and methods: A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted from a German statutory health insurance database for adult patients with UC indexed on biologic therapy initiation (2013-2015). Anonymized data were evaluated for 12 months prior to (baseline) through 24 months after (follow-up) indexing. Biologic dose escalations, steroid and immunosuppressant use, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs were evaluated, with significant differences assessed across and between index biologics. Descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and analysis of variance were performed.Results: The analysis included 304 patients (adalimumab, n = 125; golimumab, n = 47; infliximab, n = 114; vedolizumab, n = 18). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across biologics. Dose escalations occurred in 58% of patients (73% of patients receiving adalimumab), with 41% receiving subsequent de-escalation. Steroids were used during follow-up by 74% of patients; 25% received steroids >14 weeks after indexing. Overall, 41% of patients received an immunosuppressant during follow-up. Steroid and immunosuppressant use were similar across biologics. Total direct healthcare costs were higher during follow-up than baseline and differed significantly across treatments (p < .05), with highest costs for golimumab. Biologic costs contributed to a major portion of follow-up costs. HCRU and costs for most resources were higher in the first 12-month follow-up period than baseline. All resource use except gastroenterology visits returned to, or below, baseline levels 13-24 months post-index date.Limitations: There was potential for inappropriate inclusion/exclusion due to miscoding. Patients may have received biologics >12 months prior to the index date. Biologic originators and biosimilars could not be differentiated.Conclusions: These data suggest that control with current biologics is suboptimal. Further treatment options that provide sustained steroid-free remission for this patient population without the need for dose escalations or concomitant therapies may be warranted.

Dose Escalation Assessment Among Targeted Immunomodulators in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The need for individualized treatment regimens is becoming more important in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Gastroenterologists may dose adjust either by increasing the dose or shortening the dosing interval from the initial recommended maintenance dose to achieve an appropriate clinical response. Understanding the role of dose escalation in the treatment of IBD in clinical practice provides payers in the United States insight into the real-world cost-effectiveness of targeted immunomodulators (TIMs) in the management of IBD.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and magnitude of dose escalation for approved IBD therapies.

METHODS

Using the Source Healthcare Analytics database, patients with IBD who initiated treatment with a drug of interest from July 2015 to June 2017 were identified. Patient utilization of the TIMs was tracked for 12 months following initiation. All included patients had at least 2 diagnoses for ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease before TIM initiation and at least 5 claims for a drug of interest within the 12 months following initiation. Dose escalation was defined as an increase of at least 30% in the average daily dose (ADD) relative to the patient's expected maintenance dose on 2 consecutive prescriptions. The proportion of patients with dose escalation in the first 12 months after treatment initiation was determined. The magnitude of dose escalation was determined by calculating the patient's ADD across all noninduction dose claims and comparing it with the expected daily dose. Dose escalation prevalence and magnitude were used to quantify the equivalent patient treatment rate representing the number of patients per 100 that could have been treated with standard dosing, given the prevalence of dose escalation in the treated population.

RESULTS

7,028 patients (2,406 infliximab, 1,966 adalimumab, 1,745 vedolizumab, 472 ustekinumab, 285 certolizumab pegol, and 154 golimumab) met eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Among IBD therapies, dose escalation occurred most frequently with infliximab (39%), followed by adalimumab (28%), vedolizumab (23%), ustekinumab (22%), certolizumab pegol (20%), and golimumab (14%). The magnitude of dose escalation was greatest for ustekinumab (131%), followed by infliximab (70%), vedolizumab (62%), adalimumab (59%), certolizumab pegol (50%), and golimumab (45%). The calculated patient equivalence was highest for infliximab (128) and ustekinumab (128) compared with adalimumab (116), vedolizumab (114), certolizumab pegol (110), and golimumab (106).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with IBD, dose escalation occurred with all TIMs examined with varying degrees of prevalence and magnitude. Real-world utilization patterns of TIMs indicate that dose escalation is an important part of the clinical management of IBD and needs to be considered when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of IBD treatments.

DISCLOSURES

Financial support for this study was provided by AbbVie, which participated in study design, research, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, reviewing, and approving the publication. All authors contributed to the development of the publication and maintained control over the final content. Ehrenberg and McDonald are employees of IQVIA, which received funding from AbbVie to participate in this research. Griffith and Theigs are employed by AbbVie and may own stock or stock options in AbbVie.

Dose escalation and switching of biologics in ulcerative colitis: a systematic literature review in real-world evidence

Background: Biologics used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) may lose their effect over time, requiring patients to undergo dose escalation or treatment switching, and systematic literature reviews of real-world evidence on these topics are lacking. Aim: To summarize the occurrence and outcomes of dose escalation and treatment switching in UC patients in real-world evidence. Methods: Studies were searched through MEDLINE, MEDLINE IN PROCESS, Embase and Cochrane (2006-2017) as well as proceedings from three major scientific meetings. Results: In total, 41 studies were included in the review among which 35 covered dose escalation and 12 covered treatment switching of biologics. Tumor necrosis factor antagonist (anti-TNF) escalation for all patients included at induction ranged from 5% (6 months) to 50% (median 0.67 years) and 15.2% to 70.8% (8 weeks) for anti-TNF induction responders. Mean/median time to dose escalation on anti-TNF ranged from 1.84 to 11 months. The most common switching pattern, infliximab → adalimumab, occurred in 3.8% (median 5.6 years) to 25.5% (mean 3.3 years) of patients. Conclusions: Dose escalation and treatment switching of biologics may be considered as indicators of suboptimal therapy suggesting a lack of long-term remission and response under current therapies.

High anti-TNF alfa drugs trough levels are not associated with the occurrence of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Objectives: Up to 40% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with anti-TNF drugs lose response within 1 year of treatment, therefore requiring drug optimization. Although higher drug trough levels (TLs) are associated with sustained clinical outcomes, there are concerns that they may be associated with a higher risk of adverse events (AEs). The aim was to evaluate the presence of a possible association between drug TLs and the occurrence of AEs in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF drugs.Methods: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 113 IBD patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab, of whom 27 were in combination therapy with immunosuppressants. TLs were measured using a homogeneous mobility shift assay.Results: During a median follow-up of 16 months (range 1-144), we observed 103 AEs occurring in 58 patients. We found no statistically significant difference (p = .21) in median TLs between patients who did 6.7 mcg/mL; range 0.0-36.2) or did not (7.7 mcg/mL; range 0.0-20.7) experience an AE. No difference was observed in the rate of AEs between patients in mono- or combination therapy (p = .38), as well as between elderly (i.e., >65 years) and younger patients (p = .32). Considering a TL cutoff of 7 mcg/mL for infliximab and 12 mcg/mL for adalimumab, or even double these TL values, we observed no statistically significant difference in the rate of AEs occurrence.Conclusion: Our study suggests that, when clinically required, anti-TNF drug dosage may be increased without particular concerns regarding the risk of AEs occurrence in IBD patients, even in patients on combination therapy and elderly ones.

pVAX1-A20 alleviates colitis in mice by promoting regulatory T cells

AIM

To investigate whether the intrarectal administration of the ubiquitin E3 ligase A20 (A20) attenuates intestinal inflammation and influences regulatory T cells in experimental colitis.

METHODS

A dextran sulfate sodium induced chronic colitis mouse model was established. The symptoms and manifestations of colitis and the severity of colonic mucosal inflammation were evaluated. The protective role of A20 expression in the intestine was analyzed after the administration of a pVAX1-A20 recombinant eukaryotic vector, which was encapsulated into poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) as a nanoparticle.

RESULTS

pVAX1-A20 administration markedly ameliorated colonic tissue damage and reduced intestinal inflammation via the suppression of the mucosal mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling cascade. Furthermore, pVAX1-A20 promoted the splenic regulatory T cell population and forkhead box P3 expression in colonic tissue.

CONCLUSION

A20 plays a key role in the regulation of intestinal inflammation and that the overexpression of A20 in the intestine protects mice from dextran sulfate sodium induced chronic colitis.

Clinical Usefulness of Proteomics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

The protein domain is probably the most ubiquitously affected in disease, response and recovery, and therefore proteomics holds special promise for biomarker discovery in general, and particularly in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], i.e. ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Tremendous progress has been made over the past decade in the development and refinement of proteomics technologies. These advances provide opportunities for a long-anticipated personalized medicine approach to the treatment of IBD. The present review examines the current state of IBD proteomics research and its usefulness in clinical practice. We performed a systematic bibliographic search to identify studies investigating the use of proteomics in patients with IBD, and we then summarized the current 'state of the art' in the applications of proteomic technologies in the study of IBD. In particular, in the present review we provide: [1] a brief introduction to proteomics in health and disease; [2] a review of the different stages from biomarker discovery to clinical application; and [3] a comprehensive review of the clinical usefulness and application of proteomics in IBD, including: [a] screening to differentiate IBD from healthy controls; [b] differentiating Crohn's disease from ulcerative colitis; [c] prediction of the behaviour or the IBD course; [d] prediction of IBD response to biological treatment; and [e] monitoring response to treatment. We also review the importance of the type of sample-blood vs intestinal tissue-for the study of proteomics in IBD patients. Finally, we emphasize the current limitations of proteomic studies in IBD.