Ribonucleotide reductase from Fusarium oxysporum does not Respond to DNA replication stress

A pipeline for rapidly evaluating activity and inferring mechanisms of action of prospective antifungal compounds

BACKGROUND

Fungal phytopathogens are a significant threat to crops and food security, and there is a constant need to develop safe and effective compounds that antagonize them. In-planta assays are complex and tedious and are thus not suitable for initial high-throughput screening of new candidate antifungal compounds. We propose an in vitro screening pipeline that integrates five rapid quantitative and qualitative methods to estimate the efficacy and mode of action of prospective antifungal compounds.

RESULTS

The pipeline was evaluated using five documented antifungal compounds (benomyl, catechol, cycloheximide, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, and phenylacetic acid) that have different modes of action and efficacy, against the model soilborne fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis cucumerinum. We initially evaluated the five compounds' ability to inhibit fungal growth and metabolic activity using green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled F. oxysporum and PrestoBlue staining, respectively, in multiwell plate assays. We tested the compounds' inhibition of both conidial germination and hyphal elongation. We then employed FUN-1 and SYTO9/propidium iodide staining, coupled to confocal microscopy, to differentiate between fungal growth inhibition and death at the cellular level. Finally, using a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-detection assay, we were able to quantify ROS production in response to compound application.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, the proposed pipeline provides a wide array of quantitative and qualitative data on the tested compounds that can help pinpoint promising novel compounds; these can then be evaluated more vigorously using in planta screening assays. © 2024 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Iron necessity for chlamydospore germination in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense TR4

Fusarium wilt disease of banana, caused by the notorious soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 (Foc TR4), is extremely difficult to manage. Manipulation of soil pH or application of synthetic iron chelators can suppress the disease through iron starvation, which inhibits the germination of pathogen propagules called chlamydospores. However, the effect of iron starvation on chlamydospore germination is largely unknown. In this study, scanning electron microscopy was used to assemble the developmental sequence of chlamydospore germination and to assess the effect of iron starvation and pH in vitro. Germination occurs in three distinct phenotypic transitions (swelling, polarized growth, outgrowth). Outgrowth, characterized by formation of a single protrusion (germ tube), occurred at 2 to 3 h, and a maximum value of 69.3% to 76.7% outgrowth was observed at 8 to 10 h after germination induction. Germination exhibited plasticity with pH as over 60% of the chlamydospores formed a germ tube between pH 3 and pH 11. Iron-starved chlamydospores exhibited polarized-growth arrest, characterized by the inability to form a germ tube. Gene expression analysis of rnr1 and rnr2, which encode the iron-dependent enzyme ribonucleotide reductase, showed that rnr2 was upregulated (p < 0.0001) in iron-starved chlamydospores compared to the control. Collectively, these findings suggest that iron and extracellular pH are crucial for chlamydospore germination in Foc TR4. Moreover, inhibition of germination by iron starvation may be linked to a different mechanism, rather than repression of the function of ribonucleotide reductase, the enzyme that controls growth by regulation of DNA synthesis.

Essential Roles of Ribonucleotide Reductases under DNA Damage and Replication Stresses in Cryptococcus neoformans

A balance in the deoxyribonucleotide (dNTPs) intracellular concentration is critical for the DNA replication and repair processes. In the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Mec1-Rad53-Dun1 kinase cascade mainly regulates the ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) gene expression during DNA replication and DNA damage stress. However, the RNR regulatory mechanisms in basidiomycete fungi during DNA replication and damage stress remain elusive. Here, we observed that in C. neoformans, RNR1 (large RNR subunit) and RNR21 (one small RNR subunit) were required for cell viability, but not RNR22 (another small RNR subunit). RNR22 overexpression compensated for the lethality of RNR21 suppression. In contrast to the regulatory mechanisms of RNRs in S. cerevisiae, Rad53 and Chk1 kinases cooperatively or divergently controlled RNR1 and RNR21 expression under DNA damage and DNA replication stress. In particular, this study revealed that Chk1 mainly regulated RNR1 expression during DNA replication stress, whereas Rad53, rather than Chk1, played a significant role in controlling the expression of RNR21 during DNA damage stress. Furthermore, the expression of RNR22, not but RNR1 and RNR21, was suppressed by the Ssn6-Tup1 complex during DNA replication stress. Notably, we observed that RNR1 expression was mainly regulated by Mbs1, whereas RNR21 expression was cooperatively controlled by Mbs1 and Bdr1 as downstream factors of Rad53 and Chk1 during DNA replication and damage stress. Collectively, the regulation of RNRs in C. neoformans has both evolutionarily conserved and divergent features in DNA replication and DNA damage stress, compared with other yeasts. IMPORTANCE Upon DNA replication or damage stresses, it is critical to provide proper levels of deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) and activate DNA repair machinery. Ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs), which are composed of large and small subunits, are required for synthesizing dNTP. An imbalance in the intracellular concentration of dNTPs caused by the perturbation of RNR results in a reduction in DNA repair fidelity. Despite the importance of their roles, functions and regulations of RNR have not been elucidated in the basidiomycete fungi. In this study, we found that the roles of RNR1, RNR21, and RNR22 genes encoding RNR subunits in the viability of C. neoformans. Furthermore, their expression levels are divergently regulated by the Rad53-Chk1 pathway and the Ssn6-Tup1 complex in response to DNA replication and damage stresses. Therefore, this study provides insight into the regulatory mechanisms of RNR genes to DNA replication and damage stresses in basidiomycete fungi.

Evolutionary Divergence in DNA Damage Responses among Fungi

Cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair pathways contribute to maintaining genome integrity and are thought to be evolutionarily ancient and broadly conserved. For example, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and humans, DNA damage induces activation of a checkpoint effector kinase, Rad53p (human homolog Chk2), to promote cell cycle arrest and transcription of DNA repair genes.

Cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair pathways contribute to maintaining genome integrity and are thought to be evolutionarily ancient and broadly conserved. For example, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and humans, DNA damage induces activation of a checkpoint effector kinase, Rad53p (human homolog Chk2), to promote cell cycle arrest and transcription of DNA repair genes. However, recent studies have revealed variation in the DNA damage response networks of some fungi. For example, Shor et al. (mBio 11:e03044-20, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03044-20) demonstrate that in comparison to S. cerevisiae, the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata has reduced activation of Rad53p in response to DNA damage. Consequently, some downstream targets that contribute to S. cerevisiae genome maintenance, such as DNA polymerases, are transcriptionally downregulated in C. glabrata. Downregulation of genome maintenance genes likely contributes to higher rates of mitotic failure and cell death in C. glabrata. This and other recent findings highlight evolutionary diversity in eukaryotic DNA damage responses.

Genomic Instability in Fungal Plant Pathogens

Fungi and fungal-like organisms (oomycetes) that cause diseases in plants have impacted human communities for centuries and probably from the dawn of agriculture. In modern agriculture, there is a constant race between new strategies to manage fungal plant pathogens and their ability to adapt. An important component in this race is fungal genetic diversity. Mechanisms such as sexual and parasexual recombination that contribute to the creation of novel allele combinations in fungal plant pathogens are briefly discussed in the first part of this review. Advances in genomics have enabled the investigation of chromosomal aberrations of agriculturally important fungal isolates at the nucleotide level. Some of these cases are summarized in the second part of this review; it is claimed that the effect of chromosomal aberrations on pathogenicity should be studied mechanistically. More data on the effect of gene copy number variations on phenotypes that are relevant to agriculture are especially needed. Genome rearrangements through translocations have shaped the genome of fungal plant pathogens by creating lineage-specific chromosome territories encoding for genes participating in plant diseases. Pathogenicity chromosomes are unique cases of such lineage-specific genetic elements, interestingly these chromosomes can be transferred horizontally and thus transforming a non-pathogenic strain to a pathogenic one. The third part of this review describes our attempts to reveal mutators in fungal plant pathogens by identifying fungi that lack important DNA repair genes or respond to DNA damage in an unconventional way. We found that a group of fungal plant pathogens lack conserved genes that are needed for an important Holliday junction resolution pathway. In addition, in Fusarium oxysporum, the rate-limiting step in dNTP production is not induced under DNA replication stress. This is very different from organisms from bacteria to humans. It remains to be seen if these mechanisms promote genetic instability in fungal plant pathogens.