Orphan drugs: the regulatory environment

Utilization and affordability of health insurance coverage for rare disease drugs in a first-tier city in Northeast China from 2018 to 2021: a study based on the health insurance claims database

OBJECTIVE

The accessibility issue of orphan drugs in China is prominent. Based on real-world data from a tier-one city in Northeast China, this study aims to analyze the current usage and affordability of orphan drugs for rare diseases.

METHODS

The data was sourced from the health insurance claims data of a certain city from 2018 to 2021, including a total of 16 orphan drugs. The utilization of orphan drugs is assessed using four indicators: frequency of medical insurance claims, medication cost, defined daily doses (DDDs), and defined daily drug cost (DDDc). Affordability is measured using the concept of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE).

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2021, there were a total of 2,851 medical insurance claims in the city, with a total medication costs of $3.08 million. Overall, during the study, there was a year-on-year increase in the utilization frequency of individual rare disease drugs in the city, with DDDs rising from 140.22 in 2018 to 3983.63 in 2021. Additionally, the annual medication costs of individual drugs showed a consistent upward trend, increasing from $10,953.53 in 2018 to $120,491.36 in 2021. However, the DDDc of individual drugs decreased from $398.12 in 2018 to $96.65 in 2021.The number of sales and the amount of sales for orphan drugs in community pharmacies have significantly increased. Prior to medical insurance coverage, out of the 16 orphan drugs, 9 drugs had annual treatment costs exceeding CHE for urban residents, and 15 drugs had annual treatment costs exceeding CHE for rural residents. After medical insurance coverage, there were no drugs with out-of-pocket costs exceeding CHE for urban residents, while 8 drugs had out-of-pocket costs exceeding CHE for rural residents. Furthermore, both before and after medical insurance coverage, the four treatment drugs for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension were more affordable compared to the four treatment drugs for multiple sclerosis.

CONCLUSION

The usage frequency of orphan drugs in a certain city increased gradually, but the disease burden remained heavy. More policy support should be provided to the priority rare disease populations, and the rare disease medical security and diagnosis and treatment systems should be improved.

Three Pillars of Support for Orphan Drug Programs: Individual Valuations, Societal Valuations, and Anonymous Altruism

OBJECTIVES

To identify and describe potential societal and individual sources of support for orphan drug programs.

METHODS

The Generalized Risk-Adjusted Cost-Effectiveness method shows that acute illness and disability severity increase individuals' willingness to pay for health gains. We develop a social welfare function (SWF) that incorporates individuals' own values, combined with politically or ethically determined weights. We introduce the concept of horizontal equity-that individuals in similar situations should be treated similarly-into the SWF. Finally, we introduce anonymous altruism into individuals' utility functions-the desire to help others, without knowing their identity.

RESULTS

Combined with the empirical link between disease severity and rarity, the Generalized Risk-Adjusted Cost-Effectiveness method demonstrates heightened willingness to pay for health gains for people with rare diseases, leading rational individuals to support orphan drug programs, our first pillar of support. Adding horizontal equity to the SWF further increases societal support for orphan drug programs. Anonymous altruism, focusing most strongly on those in the most-dire circumstances, leads to altruistic support for those with severe disorders. Because innovators' economic incentives lead them to focus on larger markets, anonymous altruistic individuals will increasingly prefer public investments into rare diseases over time, as private markets systematically produce gains for common diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 3 supporting pillars for orphan drug programs: (1) individuals' propensity to prefer treatments for severe diseases; (2) the preference for horizontal equity in our social welfare; (3) anonymous altruism, the desire to help strangers, coupled with market incentives that underserve strangers with rare diseases.

Healthcare costs for patients with rare diseases: Evidence from China

OBJECTIVE

Rare diseases cause a huge financial burden to countless patients and families. It is an important public health issue that requires widespread attention. This study analyzes medical expenses composition and the change in trends of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses for patients with Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and explores the factors influencing these changes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Chinese Medical Insurance Department database from 2018 to 2020, including 857 patients with ALS in 60 cities across 30 provinces. We used descriptive methods to analyse the baseline characteristics and medical expenses of outpatients and inpatients with ALS. And we used quantile regression to analyse the differences in patient OOP ratio and the factors influencing them.

RESULTS

In China, 80.3% of ALS patients chose tertiary hospitals, with an annual direct medical cost of 11,339.7 RMB per patient and an OOP ratio of 41.6%. The annual medical cost for outpatients was 345.1 RMB per patient, with an OOP ratio of 36.7%. The annual medical cost for inpatients was 28,139.8 RMB per patient, with an OOP ratio of 41.7%. Compared to outpatients, inpatients had higher medical costs but lower actual reimbursement rates. The OOP ratio of ALS patients decreased, then increased over time. And the OOP ratio was influenced by medical institution, medical insurance, and age (p < 0.05). Patients who chose tertiary hospitals, those who were covered by the urban resident basic medical insurance and younger patients had relatively higher OOP ratio.

CONCLUSION

In recent years, although China has begun to pay attention to the rights and interests of patients with rare diseases, the government has provided some healthcare security to patients with rare diseases. However, the level of medical insurance coverage was still low, the equity of protection was still insufficient and the financial burden on patients was high. Therefore, the government should further improve the healthcare system to provide full life-cycle and affordable healthcare services to patients with rare diseases.

Do Reimbursement Recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health Translate Into Coverage Decisions for Orphan Drugs in the Canadian Province of Ontario?

OBJECTIVES

Unlike other high-income countries, Canada has no national policy for drugs treating rare diseases (orphan drugs). Nevertheless, in 2022, the Canadian government committed to creating a national strategy to make access to these drugs more consistent. Our aim was to study whether recommendations made by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (CADTH) translated into coverage decisions for orphan drugs in Ontario, the largest Canadian province. This study is the first to look at this question for orphan drugs, which are at the center of policy attention.

METHODS

We included 155 orphan drug-indication pairs approved and marketed in Canada between October 2002 and April 2022. Cohen's kappa was used to test the agreement across health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations and coverage decisions in Ontario. Logistic regression was used to test which factors, relevant to decision-makers, might be associated with funding in Ontario.

RESULTS

We found only fair agreement between CADTH's recommendations and coverage decisions in Ontario. Although a positive and statistically significant association between favorable HTA recommendations and coverage was found, more than half of the drugs with a negative HTA recommendation were available in Ontario, predominately through specialized funds. Successful pan-Canadian pricing negotiations were a strong predictor of coverage in Ontario.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite efforts to harmonize access to drugs across Canada, considerable room for improvement remains. Introducing a national strategy for orphan drugs could help increase transparency, consistency, promote collaborations, and make access to orphan drugs a national priority.

Long way to go: Progress of orphan drug accessibility in China from 2017 to 2022

Introduction: Over 400 million patients worldwide suffer from rare diseases. Access to orphan drugs is, therefore, crucial for this population. China has been actively working on improving orphan drug accessibility in the past decades, especially since 2018 when the First National List of Rare Diseases was announced. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of orphan drug accessibility in China regarding availability, daily cost, and affordability.

Methods: Market availability of orphan drugs in China was based on their approval status in China up to May 2022. Information on drug availability in hospitals and the cost of each drug from 2017 to 2021 was obtained from the database of the Science and Technology Development Center of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. Affordability was assessed by comparing the disposable daily income per capita to the cost of the defined daily dose of each drug.

Results: Market availability rate was 44.3% by May 2022, and the average delay in drug approval in China compared to its orphan approval in the United States of America was 5.9 ± 6.07 years. Drug availability in hospitals showed an upward trend, with availability in tertiary hospitals significantly higher than in secondary hospitals (~20%, p &lt;0.0001). The eastern area was significantly higher in availability from 2019 onwards. Fifty-eight percent of the orphan drugs were still considered to have very low availability (&lt;30%). The national median cost of the defined daily dose across all available orphan drugs had increased to 254.97 RMB in 2021. Only 34.98% of the orphan drugs were considered affordable when compared with the national average disposable daily income in 2021, and drug affordability decreased during the past 5 years.

Discussion: Changes in orphan drug regulations in China have enabled progress regarding the drugs’ market availability, but the current status of drug availability at hospitals, drug cost, and affordability were not optimal. Legislation for encouraging domestic drug development and novel payment schemes for high-value drugs are essential to further improve the availability and cost burden of orphan drugs in China

Clinical research focused in European adult women with minority diseases: Do we try hard enough?

We analyzed the European countries participation in clinical trials addressing to new drug development focused on rare diseases in women comparing to more prevalent diseases as breast cancer. Participation was not associated with type of healthcare system neither socio-economic features, but it was associated with population size. Protocol ratios focused on breast cancer vs. orphan drugs and rare diseases was 15:1 and 9:1, respectively, mainly focused on ovarian cancer. Protocol number was insufficient to evaluate the success of Regulation (EC) 141/2000, it is necessary to increase the scientific quality and the number of really new molecules.

Barriers and Facilitators of Availability of Hydroxyurea for Sickle Cell Disease in Tanzania; A Qualitative Study of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, Importers, and Regulators

Despite three decades of proven safety and effectiveness of hydroxyurea in modifying sickle cell disease (SCD), its accessibility is limited in Sub-Saharan Africa, which shares 75% of the world's SCD burden. Therefore, it is time to explore the barriers and facilitators for manufacturing and importation of hydroxyurea for SCD in Tanzania. This was qualitative research that employed a case study approach. Purposive sampling followed by an in-depth interview (IDI) using a semi-structured questionnaire aspired by data saturation enabled us to gather data from 10 participants. The study participants were people with more than three years of experience in pharmaceuticals importation, manufacturing, and regulation. The audio-recorded data were verbatim transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Two themes were generated. The first comprised barriers for importation and manufacturing of hydroxyurea with sub-themes such as inadequate awareness of SCD and hydroxyurea, limited market, and investment viability. The second comprised opportunities for importation and manufacturing of hydroxyurea with sub-themes such as awareness of activities performed by medicines regulatory authority and basic knowledge on SCD and hydroxyurea. Inadequate understanding of SCD, hydroxyurea, and orphan drug regulation are major issues that aggravate the concern for limited market and investment viability. Existing opportunities are a starting point towards increasing the availability of hydroxyurea.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Price and Affordability of Drugs for Rare Diseases in Shandong Province, China

OBJECTIVE

The affordability of rare disease drugs has become a social issue that cannot be ignored. This study aims to evaluate the current price and affordability of rare disease drugs in China, with evidence from Shandong province.

METHODS

Data on prices and affordability of 50 drugs for 22 rare diseases were collected from secondary and tertiary public hospitals in Shandong Province, using an adaptation of the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Prices were measured as Median Price Ratios (MPRs). Affordability was measured as days of daily per capita disposable income required for the cost of one month's treatment.

RESULTS

Out of the 50 rare disease drugs, 11 drugs had MSH reference prices and 34 had PBS reference prices. Median prices of 11 drugs were higher than MSH reference prices (median 1.33), and median prices of 34 drugs were higher that Australian PBS prices (median 1.97). Thirty-six (72.00%) and forty-four (88.00%) drugs were unaffordable for urban and rural residents, respectively. Thirty-four (68.00%) and thirty-eight (76.00%) drugs were unaffordable for urban and rural residents even after reimbursement by the health insurance schemes of China, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The affordability of some rare disease drugs remained poor with their relatively high prices in Shandong Province. Sustainable mechanisms are needed to reduce the price of rare disease drugs and to improve the affordability of rare disease patients.

A decade of approved first-in-class small molecule orphan drugs: Achievements, challenges and perspectives

In the past decade (2011-2020), there was a growing interest in the discovery and development of orphan drugs for the treatment of rare diseases. However, rare diseases only account for a population of 0.65‰-1‰ which usually occur with previously unknown biological mechanisms and lack of specific therapeutics, thus to increase the demands for the first-in-class (FIC) drugs with new biological targets or mechanisms. Considering the achievements in the past 10 years, a total of 410 drugs were approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which contained 151 FIC drugs and 184 orphan drugs, contributing to make up significant numbers of the approvals. Notably, more than 50% of FIC drugs are developed as orphan drugs and some of them have already been milestones in drug development. In this review, we aim to discuss the FIC small molecules for the development of orphan drugs case by case and highlight the R&D strategy with novel targets and scientific breakthroughs.

Clinical trials of orphan drugs in China over the decade 2012-2022: Opportunities and challenges

Rare diseases refer to diseases with very low prevalence. Along with the support of national policies and improvement of research capability, a new landscape for orphan drug is emerging in China. To identity unmet clinical needs and provide insight on the development of orphan drugs, we reviewed the changes over time of orphan drug clinical trials in China from 2012 to 2022. A total of 261 trials of 40 drugs were initiated, of which 66.3% trials were sponsored by Chinese local pharmaceutical enterprises. Among the 261 trials, chemical drugs (about 63.6%) and biological products (35.6%) account for the high proportions, and traditional Chinese medicine (0.8%) was the least; the indications mainly focused on homozygous hypercholesterolemia, hemophilia, multiple sclerosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; single-arm study design was applied to 50% of the clinical trials, with an average sample size of 52 participants. Additionally, totally 122 trials were completed by January 2022, of which the average duration time was 15.7 months for new drug and 3.5 months for generic drug, respectively. The trends over time illustrated that remarkable progress has been achieved in development of orphan drugs in China since 2012. Given the large patient pool and the rising capability of innovation, it is believed that China will contribute more to the global drug pipelines for rare diseases.

Market access for medicines treating rare diseases: Association between specialised processes for orphan medicines and funding recommendations

Access to medicines treating rare diseases ('orphan medicines') has proven challenging due to high prices and clinical uncertainty. To optimise market access to these medicines, some healthcare systems are implementing specialised pathways and/or processes during marketing authorisation (MA) and/or health technology assessment (HTA). Comparing one setting where these medicines are classed as "orphan" (Scotland) to another where they considered "non-orphan" (Canada), this study aims to explore whether the presence of specialised pathways and processes at MA and HTA levels is associated with more favourable funding recommendations and faster time to market access. A matched sample of 116 medicine-indication pairs with MA approval from 2001 to 2019 in Europe and Canada was identified, and publicly available sources were used for data extraction. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. All medicines were commercially marketed in both countries, except one instance in Scotland. In Scotland, more orphan medicines (68.1%) had a favourable HTA recommendation than in Canada (60.4%), while Canada issued more negative HTA recommendations (20.7%) than Scotland (15.5%). Low levels of agreement on HTA recommendations and the main reasons driving recommendations were found between settings. In both countries, medicines with specialised MA approval were less likely to receive negative HTA recommendations than medicines with standard MA. Time to market access was faster in Canada than Scotland, though medicines with specialised MA approval had slower timelines than medicines with standard MA approval in both countries. However, it is unclear whether the presence of orphan designation and HTA specialised processes alone could result in favourable funding recommendations without accounting for other healthcare system-related factors and differences in the decision-making processes across settings. Holistic approaches and better alignment of evidentiary requirements across regulators are needed to optimise access to orphan medicines.

Molecular Similarity Perception Based on Machine-Learning Models

Molecular similarity is an impressively broad topic with many implications in several areas of chemistry. Its roots lie in the paradigm that ‘similar molecules have similar properties’. For this reason, methods for determining molecular similarity find wide application in pharmaceutical companies, e.g., in the context of structure-activity relationships. The similarity evaluation is also used in the field of chemical legislation, specifically in the procedure to judge if a new molecule can obtain the status of orphan drug with the consequent financial benefits. For this procedure, the European Medicines Agency uses experts’ judgments. It is clear that the perception of the similarity depends on the observer, so the development of models to reproduce the human perception is useful. In this paper, we built models using both 2D fingerprints and 3D descriptors, i.e., molecular shape and pharmacophore descriptors. The proposed models were also evaluated by constructing a dataset of pairs of molecules which was submitted to a group of experts for the similarity judgment. The proposed machine-learning models can be useful to reduce or assist human efforts in future evaluations. For this reason, the new molecules dataset and an online tool for molecular similarity estimation have been made freely available.

Orphan Drug Use in Patients With Rare Diseases: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Orphan drugs are used for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of rare diseases that, in the European Union, are defined as disorders affecting no more than 5 persons in 10,000. So far, a total of around 800 orphan medicinal products have been approved by the European Medicines Agency, however the utilization profile of orphan drugs has yet to be explored. This study aimed at assessing the utilization profile of orphan drugs authorized for marketing by the Italian Medicines Agency using population-based data.

Methods: A total of 21 orphan drugs used in outpatient settings, approved in the European Union before or during the 2008–2018 period and involving 15 rare diseases, were included in the study. The monitored population included patients with one of the conditions surveilled by the population-based Tuscany Registry of Rare Diseases and diagnosed between 2000–2018. A multi-database approach was applied, by linking data from the registry with information collected in drug prescriptions databases. The prevalence and intensity of use were estimated for the selected orphan drugs and other non-orphan medications, used to treat the same rare disease and for which a change in the prevalence of use was hypothesized after authorization of the orphan drug.

Results: For some diseases (acquired aplastic anemia, tuberous sclerosis complex, most metabolic diseases) a low prevalence of orphan drugs use was observed (range between 1.1–12.5%). Conversely, orphan drugs were frequently used in hemophilia B, Wilson disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (maximum of 78.3, 47.6 and 41.8%, respectively). For hemophilia B and Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, there are currently no other medications used in clinical practice in addition to orphan drugs. Six orphan drugs were used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, appearing the elective therapy for this disease, albeit with different utilization profiles (range of prevalence 1.7–55.6%).

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the utilization profile of orphan drugs prescribed in a defined geographical area, and providing relevant information to monitor over time potential changes in the prevalence of these medications as well as in the health care decision making.

Use of priority and provisional approval pathways by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration in approving new medicines: a cross-sectional study

ObjectiveExamine the use of priority and provisional approval pathways by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for evaluating new medicines.MethodsThis observational study assessed all new medicines approved by the TGA between 1 January 2018 and 18 October 2021. It examined how frequently priority and provisional approval pathways are being used, the conditions which the medicines are being approved to treat, how long medicines are spending in the approval pathways, the additional therapeutic value of the medicines being approved through these pathways and how the use of the pathways compares with similar regulatory pathways used by Health Canada.ResultsThe TGA approved 138 new medicines in the time period under study, of which 33 were approved through either the priority or provisional approval pathways. Sixteen were approved to treat cancer. It took the TGA a mean of 130 (95% CI 118, 143) and 144 (95% 101, 188) working days for priority and provisional pathways, respectively. Therapeutic evaluations were available for 16 of these medicines and 11 offered little to no therapeutic gain over existing medicines. There was moderate agreement between the TGA and Health Canada in their use of these pathways (Kappa = 0.5458, 95% CI 0.3900, 0.7016).ConclusionsThe priority and provisional approval pathways are now being used by the TGA for about one-third of all new medicine approvals. Although the medicines approved in these ways are moving through the review process more quickly than those approved through the standard approval pathway, the majority of these medicines, for which an evaluation of therapeutic value is available, do not offer any substantial additional therapeutic value over existing medicines.

Global Regulatory and Public Health Initiatives to Advance Pediatric Drug Development for Rare Diseases

The literature thoroughly describes the challenges of pediatric drug development for rare diseases. This includes (1) generating interest from sponsors, (2) small numbers of children affected by a particular disease, (3) difficulties with study design, (4) lack of definitive outcome measures and assessment tools, (5) the need for additional safeguards for children as a vulnerable population, and (6) logistical hurdles to completing trials, especially with the need for longer term follow-up to establish safety and efficacy. There has also been an increasing awareness of the need to engage patients and their families in drug development processes and to address inequities in access to pediatric clinical trials. The year 2020 ushered in yet another challenge—the COVID-19 pandemic. The pediatric drug development ecosystem continues to evolve to meet these challenges. This article will focus on several key factors including recent regulatory approaches and public health policies to facilitate pediatric rare disease drug development, emerging trends in product development (biologics, molecularly targeted therapies), innovations in trial design/endpoints and data collection, and current efforts to increase patient engagement and promote equity. Finally, lessons learned from COVID-19 about building adaptable pediatric rare disease drug development processes will be discussed.

Initial and supplementary indication approval of new targeted cancer drugs by the FDA, EMA, Health Canada, and TGA

Background. Previous research focused on the clinical evidence supporting new cancer drugs’ initial US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, targeted drugs are increasingly approved for supplementary indications of unknown evidence and benefit. Objectives. To examine the clinical trial evidence supporting new targeted cancer drugs’ initial and supplementary indication approval in the US, EU, Canada, and Australia. Data and Methods. 25 cancer drugs across 100 indications were identified with FDA approval between 2009–2019. Data on regulatory approval and clinical trials were extracted from the FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Health Canada (HC), Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), and clinicaltrials.gov. Regional variations were compared with χ²-tests. Multivariate logistic regressions compared characteristics of initial and supplementary indication approvals, reporting adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Out of 100 considered cancer indications, the FDA approved 96, the EMA 92, HC 86, and the TGA 83 (83%, p < 0.05). The FDA more frequently granted priority review, conditional approval, and orphan designations than other agencies. Initial approvals were more likely to receive conditional / accelerated approval (AOR: 2.69, 95%CI [1.07–6.77], p < 0.05), an orphan designation (AOR: 3.32, 95%CI [1.38–8.00], p < 0.01), be under priority review (AOR: 2.60, 95%CI [1.17–5.78], p < 0.05), and be monotherapies (AOR: 5.91, 95%CI [1.14–30.65], p < 0.05) than supplementary indications. Initial indications’ pivotal trials tended to be shorter (AOR per month: 0.96, 95%CI [0.93–0.99], p < 0.05), of lower phase design (AOR per clinical phase: 0.28, 95%CI [0.09–0.85], p < 0.05), and enroll more patients (AOR per 100 patients: 1.19, 95%CI [1.01–1.39], p < 0.05). Conclusions. Targeted cancer drugs are increasingly approved for multiple indications of varying clinical benefit. Drugs are first approved as monotherapies in rare diseases with a high unmet need. Whilst expedited regulatory review incentivizes this prioritization, indication-specific safety, efficacy, and pricing policies are necessary to reflect each indication’s differential clinical and economic value.

Assessing the value of orphan drugs using conventional cost-effectiveness analysis: Is it fit for purpose?

Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis—i.e., assessing pharmaceuticals through a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) framework—originated from a societal commitment to maximize population health given limited resources. This "extra-welfarist" approach has produced pricing and reimbursement systems that are not well- aligned with the unique considerations of orphan drugs. This framework has been slow to evolve along with our increased understanding of the impact of rare diseases, which in turn has complicated the assessment of orphan drugs meant to treat rare diseases. Herein, we (i) discuss the limitations of conventional cost-effectiveness analysis as applied to assessing access to, as well as the pricing and reimbursement of, orphan drugs, (ii) critically appraise alternative and supplemental approaches, and (iii) offer insights on plausible steps forward.

Drug Lag and Associated Factors for Approved Drugs in Korea Compared with the United States

(1) Background: Drug lag, the delay between the first global regulatory approval and approval by the national health authorities in other countries, impacts the accessibility of drugs. Although the Korean pharmaceutical market has grown significantly, most of its innovative drugs for public health depend on imports from foreign pharmaceutical markets. (2) Methods: We extracted data from the official websites of the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the US Food and Drug Administration. Information on new molecule entity drugs, approved as imported drugs by MFDS from 2000 to 2019, was extracted. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models on drug approval were estimated. (3) Results: In total, 424 drugs were analyzed. Orphan drugs designated by MFDS were less likely to receive approval (HR = 0.731, 95% CI: 0.572–0.934). The drugs with Korean MAHs were less likely to obtain drug approval than those with MAHs of subsidiaries of multinational pharmaceutical companies (HR = 0.524, 95% CI: 0.371–0.738). In the analyses for non-orphan drugs (n = 37), oncology drugs that need local clinical study (HR = 0.247, 95% CI: 0.093–0.657) and drugs that need more patients in a local clinical study (HR = 0.993, 95% CI: 0.988–0.999) were less likely to receive approval, with longer drug lag. The higher number of clinical studies in Korea was associated with a shorter drug lag (HR = 2.133, 95% CI: 1.196–3.805). (4) Conclusions: Our findings imply that Korean pharmaceutical companies should augment their research capabilities for new drug development. Furthermore, consideration of orphan drugs used in rare diseases is needed for drug approval to ensure the availability of these drugs in the market without approval delays.

An overview of cancer drugs approved through expedited approval programs and orphan medicine designation globally between 2011 and 2020

The use of expedited approval pathways for anticancer drug development, which provide the advantages of high efficiency and cost-effectiveness, has expanded significantly in recent years. During the past decade, a total of 410 new molecular entities have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with a steady growth of 6.5% in the US. In Europe, 9-75% of approved anticancer drugs were granted at least one expedited approval program. Various expedited pathways have also been implemented worldwide to address underrepresented medical needs rapidly. China has adapted several expedited approval programs, including breakthrough therapy designation, priority review, and conditional approval, to keep up with the growth in pharmaceutical development. It is expected that worldwide standards for drug approval will become more standardized in the next decade.

A Visual Phenotype-Based Differential Diagnosis Process for Rare Diseases

PURPOSE

Phenotype-based rapid diagnosis can make up for the time-consuming genetic sequencing diagnosis of rare diseases. However, the collected phenotypes of patients can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete, which limits the accuracy of diagnostic results. To solve this problem, we try to design a phenotype-based differential diagnosis process for rare diseases to achieve rapid and accurate diagnosis of rare diseases.

METHODS

The core of the differential diagnosis of rare diseases is to optimize the phenotype information of a specific patient and the visualized comparative analysis of diseases. To recommend additional phenotypes, replace the fuzzy phenotypes and filter the unexplained phenotypes for patients, we constructed a phenotype hierarchical network and a disease-phenotype differential network and calculated the phenotype co-occurrence relationship. In addition, we designed a visual comparative analysis method to explore the correlation and difference of disease phenotypes.

RESULTS

The evaluation based on the published 10 rare disease cases demonstrated that after the optimization of patient phenotype information through our differential diagnosis, the target disease often got a better ranking and recommendation score than before. We have deployed this scheme on the RDmap project ( http://rdmap.nbscn.org ).

CONCLUSION

Compared to genetic and molecular analysis, phenotype-based diagnosis is faster, cheaper, and easier. The differential diagnosis process we designed can optimize the phenotype information of patients and better locate the target disease. It can also help to make screening decisions before genetic testing.

Rare disease patients’ needs: an up-to-date analysis and future directions

The interest to rare diseases has increased in the recent decades. Legislation seeks to facilitate patients’ access to innovative and effective treatment and to define incentives for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to develop new medicines for rare diseases.The current review presents the current knowledge and adopted solutions in the field of rare diseases and discusses the future issues and unmet needs that should be resolved for affected patients and their families. Along with the positive trends in the field of rare diseases, there are still issues related to diagnosis and inequal care for some patients groups that should be solved over the next decade. The innovative digital health methods, which have been improved continuously in the recent years, implementation of improved versions of patient-centered policy plans and programs and investment in advanced therapies could move forward the rare diseases to new horizons giving them the opportunity to overcome the main barriers and challenges in the whole journey of the patients – from diagnosis through treatment to follow-up.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Rare Tumours: A Systematic Review

Background

Rare cancers, as defined by the European Union, occur in fewer than 15 out of 100,000 people each year. The International Rare Cancer Consortium defines rare cancer incidence as less than six per 100,000 per year. There is a growing number of reports of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with rare tumours, and hence, we conducted a comprehensive review to summarise and analyse the available literature.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed was performed on January 31, 2021, using the following ICI names as keywords: ipilimumab, tremelimumab, cemiplimab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, avelumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab. Studies on patients with rare tumours who were being treated with ICIs were included. We plotted the overall response rate against the corresponding median survival across a variety of cancer types using linear regression.

Results

From 1,255 publications retrieved during the primary search, 62 publications were selected (with a total of 4,620 patients). Only four were randomised trials. A minority were first-line studies, while the remaining were studies in which ICIs were delivered as salvage therapy in pretreated patients. There was a good correlation between response rate and overall survival (Spearman R2 >0.9) in skin cancers, mesothelioma, and sarcomas.

Conclusions

Treatment of advanced-stage rare tumours with ICI therapy was found to be associated with significant activity in some orphan diseases (e.g., Merkel cell carcinoma) and hepatocellular carcinoma. Several ongoing prospective clinical trials will expand the knowledge on the safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with these rare cancers.

The interoperability between the Spanish version of the International Classification of Diseases and ORPHAcodes: towards better identification of rare diseases

BACKGROUND

Rare diseases present a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and severity levels and are often poorly known and underrepresented, making them difficult to classify. Diagnoses are usually coded using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), with its different versions. In Spain, the ICD-10-ES (stem from the ICD-10-CM-Clinical Modification) is used throughout the National Healthcare System since 2016, indistinctively including rare diseases that often lack a specific code. Orphanet aims to provide high-quality resources on rare diseases. The goal was to interrelate the Orphanet classification with the ICD-10-ES in order to engage a tool to track rare diseases diagnosis and characterize the improvement space for the identification of rare diseases patients in the Spanish Healthcare System.

METHODS

5775 disorder level ORPHAcodes were mapped to ICD-10-ES codes by comparing the descriptors associated in both classifications. ORPHAcodes were then clustered based on their assigned ICD-10-ES chapter and the redundancy of each individual ICD-10-ES code was calculated by counting the ORPHAcodes they mapped to. Three groups were established: Group 1 (1 ORPHAcode per ICD-10-ES), Group 2 (between 2-49 ORPHAcodes per ICD-10-ES) and Group 3 (≥ 50 ORPHAcodes per ICD-10-ES).

RESULTS

Equivalences to 1700 ICD-10-ES codes were established for 5664 ORPHAcodes. The ORPHAcodes distribution within the ICD-10-ES showed an aggregation in the "Q" (> 40%), "G" (> 14%), and "E" (12%) chapters. The availability of ICD-10-ES codes to map ORPHAcodes reached its lowest at the "G" and "Q" chapters with less than 0.2 ICD-10-ES codes available per ORPHAcode. Global ICD-10-ES codes redundancy analysis revealed that only 1055 of the equivalences pertain to group 1. Group 2 contained 3358 equivalences with 634 ICD-10-ES codes while 1322 equivalences were group 3 (11 ICD-10-ES). Within ICD-10-ES chapters, "G" and "Q" contained over 30% and 45% of their own equivalences in the highest redundancy level (group 3) respectively, but under 10% one to one equivalences each (group 1).

CONCLUSIONS

ICD-10-ES codes have not enough specificity to identify rare diseases. Direct mapping between ICD and ORPHAcodes or the integration of ORPHAcodes at the healthcare system for diagnoses codification would enable better detection and epidemiological analysis of rare diseases.

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations of Placental Therapeutics

PURPOSE

Placental therapeutics aim to treat placental disease; however, ethical and regulatory issues should be considered if the drug also potentially affects the fetus. Drugs that might transfer or edit genes carry a specific challenge because currently fetal gene editing and fetal gene therapy are considered unethical.

METHODS

This article reviews the literature on ethical and regulatory considerations for placental therapeutics.

FINDINGS

Proposals for maternal gene therapy, directed to the maternal side of the placenta, have been discussed with patients and stakeholders. No absolute ethical, legal, or regulatory barriers to this potential treatment were identified. Patients who have experienced placental disease, such as fetal growth restriction, are interested in these therapies; some would participate in first-in-human trials. Such trials need careful regulatory considerations, such as the steps required to indicate tolerability and efficacy in preclinical models and the optimal animals for reproductive toxicology studies. Ex vivo dual human placenta perfusion experiments and villous explant in vitro studies allow drugs to be tested in normal and diseased human placenta, providing short-term tolerability and toxicologic assessment. Testing drugs in nonhuman primates is an option but carries ethical and feasibility considerations. Selection of inclusion and exclusion criteria for clinical trial participants is important to ensure that the most suitable patients are exposed to a first-in-human drug. These patients will almost certainly be pregnant women with a high risk of perinatal loss and/or perinatal and maternal morbidity. Criteria should identify sufficient numbers of patients to make a trial feasible as well as a phenotype that will respond to the mechanism of action. How to dose escalate and to capture information on adverse events are also key to optimal clinical trial design.

IMPLICATIONS

Developing placental therapeutics requires input from scientists, practitioners, and regulators and close liaison with patients to ensure that new drugs are tested as carefully as possible.

How Do Patients and Doctors Perceive Medical Services for Rare Diseases Differently in China? Insights from Two National Surveys

Background: Increasing attention is being paid to improve the quality of life of patients with rare diseases in China. However, we are currently unaware of the problems encountered in the medical services of rare diseases from the viewpoints of doctors and patients. This study addressed the differences in the perceived barriers of diagnosis and treatments for rare diseases between doctors and patients in China. Methods: Two independent cross-sectional surveys on the perception of Chinese doctors’ and patients’ experiences with rare diseases were launched online between January and February 2018. A non-probability, convenience sampling method was employed to recruit participants. Results: In all, 45 rare diseases were reported by 139 doctors and 1853 patients. Patients with rare diseases faced significantly more difficulties in receiving accurate diagnosis (72.0%) and accessing information related to diagnosis and treatment (77.3%) as compared with doctors (34.5% and 40.3%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Specially, patients felt more difficulties than doctors in obtaining sustainable treatment for rare diseases (84.3% vs. 49.6%, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of patients (58.7%) than that of doctors (39.1%) had concerns in terms of the affordability of drugs. Further, 66.3% patients claimed that the drugs used to treat their conditions were not covered by their current medical insurances, whereas only 21.6% for doctors (p < 0.0001). Moreover, 35.3% of doctors responded that they recommended patients to visit the specialist they knew or were acquainted with, whereas 30.0% of patients said that their doctors chose to treat them based on their past experiences (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The perceived experience of patients with regard to diagnosis and treatment was significantly different from that of doctors. An integrated medical service platform should be established to facilitate better communication and mutual understanding of rare diseases between patients and doctors.

Old active ingredients in new medicinal products: is the regulatory path coherent with patients' expectations?

The rising costs of new medicinal products are a challenge to the economic sustainability of national healthcare systems in ensuring patients' access to therapies. European Union (EU) and US legislators have provided regulatory pathways aimed at simplifying Marketing Authorization (MA) applications for new medicinal products in cases when safety and efficacy profiles can be derived from the data of already-marketed products. In this review, we discuss the different regulatory pathways towards the MA of new medicinal products containing old drug substances and intended to improve the therapeutic value of a treatment, to obtain a new therapeutic indication (drug repositioning), or to ensure the same therapeutic value of a reference product at lower costs.

Patient Accessibility and Budget Impact of Orphan Drugs in South Korea: Long-Term and Real-World Data Analysis (2007-2019)

This study aimed to identify orphan drug accessibility and impact on pharmaceutical budgets in South Korea by analyzing the status of orphan drug designation, approval, reimbursement, and pharmaceutical expenditure. We analyzed the dataset on orphan drugs designated, approved, and reimbursed from 2007 to 2019 based on long-term real-world data. The designated and approved orphan drugs were 165 and 156, respectively, and 88 out of 156 approved products were reimbursed. Total expenditure on orphan drugs increased annually to account for about 1.44% of total pharmaceutical expenditure in 2018. Orphan drug expenditure per patient increased on average by 8.7% per year. The average annual cost of orphan drugs was USD 27,000–USD 47,000, with the maximum value of USD 260,000–USD 560,000. As there are a number of orphan drugs that have not yet been reimbursable after approval, a reimbursement policy should be established that considers the characteristics of orphan drugs. Since the rapid increase in orphan drug expenditure can be a potential threat to the insurance budget, budget management should also be considered. In conclusion, it is necessary to take preemptive measures to manage the health insurance budget efficiently while improving patient accessibility to orphan drugs.

Disease awareness or subtle product placement? Orphan diseases featured in the television series "House, M.D." - a cross-sectional analysis

Background

Approximately 7% of the general population is affected by an orphan disease, which, in the United States, is defined as affecting fewer than 1 in 1500 people. Disease awareness is often low and time-to-diagnosis delayed. Different legislations worldwide have created incentives for pharmaceutical companies to develop drugs for orphan diseases. A journalistic article in Bloomberg Businessweek has claimed that pharmaceutical companies have tried marketing orphan drugs by placing a specific disease into the popular television series “House, M.D.” which features diagnostic journeys and was produced between 2004 and 2012. This study aimed to describe the presentation of orphan diseases in the television series “House, M.D.”, to test in an exploratory fashion the hypothesis that treatable orphan conditions are overrepresented in “House, M.D.” and to discuss whether such marketing practices may or may not be ethical.

Methods

A list of all medical cases depicted in the television series “House, M.D.” was obtained and classified as orphan or non-orphan according to the Orphanet database. The ratios of orphan diseases among all diseases, such with an orphan drug designation and such with an orphan drug approval by the FDA were then compared with conservative approximations of real world conditions (chi-squared tests for equality of proportions). STROBE criteria were respected.

Results

Out of a total of n = 181 different medical diagnoses, n = 42 (23.2%) were orphan diseases. The difference in percentages in between “House, M.D.” and reality was not statistically significant for orphan diseases overall (p = 0.96), yet was statistically significantly higher for both orphan diseases with one or more orphan drug designations (p = 0.0192) and such with one or more approved orphan drugs (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Orphan diseases with a designated and/or approved orphan drug were overrepresented in the television series “House, M.D.” with statistical significance while orphan diseases overall were not. This may be explained by (so far) undocumented efforts of pharmaceutical companies to place their orphan drugs in the television series, as described in the article in Bloomberg Businessweek. Further research is needed into marketing practices in popular and emerging media formats.

Moyamoya disease: A retrospective study of 198 cases

BACKGROUND

Moyamoya disease belongs to rare diseases which are arousing public awareness of its importance in China. In order to investigate the clinical features of inpatients diagnosed Moyamoya disease, the study was conducted to collect clinical information data of subjects on demographic information and clinical characteristics in Henan, China.

METHODS

The data of 198 cases of Moyamoya disease from 56 tertiary hospitals in Henan province from January 2003 to June 2015 were collected retrospectively. Analysis was performed based on demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of the patients.

RESULTS

The mean onset age was 44.03±14.45 years old. Unilateral limb weakness (36.4%) was the most common physical examination. Primary clinical manifestation was headache and dizziness (50.3%). Cranial CT showed cerebral infarction was mainly located in the frontal lobe (27.4%). MRA and DSA showed lesions mainly located in the middle cerebral artery (30.3% and 18.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical manifestations of Moyamoya disease varied. Early diagnosis was necessary to reduce the misdiagnosis rate of this disease. Symptoms, radiological characteristics, and lesion localization characteristics should be fully considered, especially for indicators with a certain onset age, headache and dizziness, lesion located in the frontal lobe of middle cerebral artery.

Timing of Pediatric Drug Approval and Clinical Evidence Submitted to Regulatory Authorities: International Comparison Among Japan, the United States, and the European Union

Many prescription drugs approved for adult use lack pediatric labeling information, resulting in their off-label use in children. Drug regulatory authorities have developed legal and regulatory frameworks to promote pediatric drug development. However, the current state of pediatric indication approval and quality of efficacy evidence, which forms the basis of regulatory approvals, is unknown. Here, we analyzed novel therapeutics approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union during 2005-2014 to investigate the timing and frequency of pediatric indication approval, and characterized the design of pediatric studies supporting regulatory approval. We found that the United States and European Union experienced a higher frequency of supplemental indication approval in pediatrics based on better-designed studies than Japan. The speed and efficiency of pediatric drug development will improve by coordinating pediatric studies on an international basis. The results also implied the necessity for a robust system of postmarketing monitoring of pediatric efficacy and safety.

Reimbursement Status and Recommendations Related to Orphan Drugs in European Countries

Objective: To review the reimbursement recommendations issued by selected European health technology assessment agencies for orphan drugs and the reimbursement status of these drugs; to assess the relationship between the type of recommendation and reimbursement status.

Methods: The list of orphan drugs to be included in the analysis was obtained from the European Medicines Agency and Orphanet. Seven European states were included in the analysis: Belgium, England, France, Germany, Poland, Scotland, and Spain. For all identified orphan drugs, relevant data on the reimbursement status and type of recommendation were collected for each country. The relationship between the type of recommendation and reimbursement status was evaluated separately for each considered country, using Cohen’s kappa coefficient for the measurement of agreement; sub-analyses for oncology and metabolic drugs were performed.

Results: Most reimbursement recommendations for orphan drugs were positive (71%), while approximately 17% were negative and almost 13% were conditional. The highest percentage of positive reimbursement recommendations was observed in Spain (97%) and France (95%) and the highest percentage of negative reimbursement recommendations was revealed for Poland (49%). On average, 65% of the 163 analyzed orphan drugs were reimbursed from public funds. The highest number of reimbursed orphan drugs was observed in Germany (n = 148), while the lowest, in Poland (n = 41). Considering all analyzed drugs, the highest agreement between recommendations and reimbursement status was observed for Spain (value of 1), and the lowest, for Germany (κ = -0.03).

Conclusions: On average, more than 60% of identified orphan drugs were reimbursed from public funds in the included countries, and the majority of reimbursement recommendations were found to be positive. The agreement between reimbursement recommendations and reimbursement status differed between the countries, but overall, it did not show any patterns, as it ranged from -0.03 to 1 (κ coefficient).

Does an Orphan Drug Policy Make a Difference in Access? A Comparison of Canada and Australia

Canada has been discussing whether to implement an orphan drug policy for more than 25 years. Recently, the federal government announced funding for orphan drugs starting in 2022, and the Canadian Senate has recommended that the country develop an orphan drug policy. This paper uses a list of orphan drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration between 2008 and 2017, inclusive. It then compares Canada, which has no orphan drug policy, and Australia, which has had such a policy since 1997. There was no difference between the countries in the proportion of orphan drugs approved, the time drugs spent in the regulatory review process, and any delay in marketing the drugs in the respective countries compared to the United States. Both Canada and Australia approved virtually all of the drugs that offered a moderate to significant therapeutic improvement. If Canada hopes to provide faster access to orphan drugs, especially those that are therapeutically innovative, it will need to develop a policy that is significantly different from that in Australia.

Application of orphan drug designation to cancer treatments (2008-2017): a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the USA and EU

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in the characteristics of cancer drugs designated as orphan drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Identification of all cancer drugs (initial or supplementary indication) with orphan status approved by the FDA between 2008-2017 based on publicly accessible reports. The European public assessment reports (EPAR) was searched to determine whether these FDA-approved drugs were also approved by the EMA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Extraction of active ingredient, trade name, approval date and approved indication from two FDA data sources (Orphan Drug Product Designation Database, Drugs@FDA) and comparison with the same data from EPAR.

RESULTS

The FDA approved 135 cancer drugs with orphan indications that met our inclusion criteria, of which 101 (75%) were also approved by the EMA. 80/101 (79%) were first approved in the USA. Only 41/101 (41%) also received orphan designation by the EMA. 33/101 (33%) were approved for biomarker-based indications in the USA, however, only nine approved cancer drug indications by the EMA were biomarker-derived drugs. 78% (47/60) of approved cancer drugs that were only approved in the USA with orphan status were indicated for solid tumours, 22% (13/60) had indications for non-solid tumours. By contrast, out of those approved cancer drugs that received orphan designation by both agencies, 20% (8/41) were indicated for solid, and 80% (33/41) for non-solid tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Orphan designation was intended to encourage drug development for rare conditions. This study shows that the FDA approves more cancer drugs with such designations compared with the EMA, especially for subgroups of more prevalent cancers. One reason for the difference could be that the European Union requires demonstration of significant benefit for drugs that target the same indication as a drug already on the market to earn the orphan designation.

An impact analysis of the implementation of health technology assessment for new treatment of orphan diseases in Japan

Objectives: In Japan, a cost-effectiveness evaluation (CEE) for pricing was introduced in April 2019 and potentially covers orphan drugs (ODs) within its scope. The purpose of this study was to explore a reasonable approach to evaluate the utility of health technology assessment (HTA) for ODs in Japan. Methods: We extracted ODs that were approved in Japan from 2009 to 2018, and investigated their appraisals in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, where HTA and different frameworks on ODs have been implemented. Results: Overall, 76 ODs were identified, with high recommendation rates in the three countries (80.6%-90.9%). The major reason for negative recommendation was uncertainty regarding clinical effectiveness, with actual decisions varying across countries. This indicates difficulties in setting an objective evaluation for the uncertainty of clinical effectiveness. The results of the CEE were mainly used to adjust prices. Conclusion: As Japan's CEE is expected to be used only for price adjustment after reimbursement is secured, the approach seems to be similar to the other countries. However, pre-launch clinical data are limited and the peak sales of ODs vary in Japan. Therefore, the careful introduction of CEE and multifaceted measures referring to the policies for ODs in other countries should be considered.

The needs of patients with rare disease in Serbia. Why do we need National Strategy for rare disease?

The patients with rare diseases in Serbia face the difficulties in procurement of medications as the Health insurance fund does not cover reimbursement for some medications, they face difficulties in receiving proper diagnosis which makes their position specific and complex. In an attempt to provide more support for the patients with rare diseases, their families and caregivers the helpline for rare diseases was established in October 2015. The aim of this research was to identify, examine and systematise needs of helpline users and forms of assistance provided by the team from the free helpline. The research was designed as a cross-sectional study and was conducted between October 2015 and December 2016. The electronic database of National Organization for rare disease in Serbia helpline users was used as a data source. The user was the person who contacted helpline (patient, relative, friend, physician, etc). The "need" refers to the reasons for addressing the helpline. Helpline users had 549 needs in total; about healthcare-236 (42.98%), social care-113 (20.58%), psychological support-56 (10.20%) and other-144 (26.22%). Services were provided by the lawyer-130 (23.70%), social worker-71 (12.93%), Psychologist-56 (10.20%) and by all employees-292 (53.19%). The most common need for legal assistance among needs on healthcare was on legal aspects of access to and reimbursement of expenses for medications (32/74%-43.24%) and procedures for reimbursement of treatment abroad (11/74%-14.86%). The problems of patients with rare diseases and their families result primarily from the lack of relevant information and knowledge, as well as the non-recognition of rare diseases in the laws and regulations of health and social care. Some problems can simply be solved by legal changes and by a better organisation and do not require additional funding. Only by adopting and implementing the National Strategy and Action Plan for Rare Diseases, the greatest number of problems and needs of people with rare diseases can be systematised and solved.

Clinical research challenges in rare genetic diseases in Brazil

Rare diseases are defined as conditions with a prevalence of no more than 6.5 per 10,000 people. Although each rare disease individually affects a small number of people, collectively, the 6,000 to 8,000 rare conditions (80% of them with genetic cause) affect around 8% of the world's population. Research about the natural history and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of rare diseases, as well as clinical trials with new drugs, are important and necessary to develop new strategies for the treatment of these conditions. This report describes the experience of a clinical research group working with rare diseases in a reference center for lysosomal diseases in Brazil (Medical Genetics Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre). The activities of this research group enabled its participation in several international multicenter clinical research protocols related to the natural history or therapy development for rare genetic diseases. This participation has allowed the development of personal skills and institutional facilities for clinical research. The clinical research developed in our center has raised the quality of the medical assistance provided to non-clinical research patients in addition to enabling early access to new therapies to many patients with orphan conditions.

Generic Substitution of Orphan Drugs for the Treatment of Rare Diseases: Exploring the Potential Challenges

Generic drugs are important components of measures introduced by healthcare regulatory authorities to reduce treatment costs. In most patients and conditions the switch from a branded drug to its generic counterpart is performed with no major complications. However, evidence from complex diseases suggests that generic substitution requires careful evaluation in some settings and that current bioequivalence criteria may not always be adequate for establishing the interchangeability of branded and generic products. Rare diseases, also called orphan diseases, are a group of heterogeneous diseases that share important characteristics: in addition to their scarcity, most are severe, chronic, highly debilitating, and often present in early childhood. Finding a treatment for a rare disease is challenging. Thanks to incentives that encourage research and development programs in rare diseases, several orphan drugs are currently available. The elevated cost of orphan drugs is a highly debated issue and a cause of limited access to treatment for many patients. As patent protection and the exclusivity period of several orphan drugs will expire soon, generic versions of orphan drugs should reach the market shortly, with great expectations about their impact on the economic burden of rare diseases. However, consistent with other complex diseases, generic substitution may require thoughtful considerations and may be even contraindicated in some rare conditions. This article provides an overview of rare disease characteristics, reviews reports of problematic generic substitution, and discusses why generic substitution of orphan drugs may be challenging and should be undertaken carefully in rare disease patients.

The impact of orphan drug policies in treating rare diseases

This paper is based on Shalini Weerasooriya's Masters dissertation in Public Health at the University of Sheffield. A literature review was conducted to understand the role that orphan drug policies have played in the development of new treatments for rare diseases. The impacts of the policies were categorised as 'tangible' or 'intangible' and further synthesis identified 10 main themes such as incentives for investment, criteria for eligibility and assessment of drug applications and further guidance to industry during the drug development cycle. The review concludes that whilst policies have contributed positively towards improving the research and development of orphan drugs it has not exhausted its uses and must now shift its focus to facilitating greater accessibility and affordability of the treatments and that stakeholders are essential to the success of this process. Implications for practice are identified, for example the need to further update and refine the policy with changing demographics and advancing technologies and, in particular, greater collaboration and involvement through, for example, evidence based training programmes is recommended. It is concluded that focus must shift to address the gap between having available drugs and being able to access and afford them. F.J.

From Rare to Neglected Diseases: A Sustainable and Inclusive Healthcare Perspective for Reframing the Orphan Drugs Issue

This work is about how healthcare issues can be reframed from a sustainable and inclusive development perspective. Focusing on the case of orphan drugs and rare diseases, first, a country-based review of the main regulatory approaches to orphan drugs is conducted; then, the main contributions of the literature are reviewed to identify dominant views and the way the problem is more commonly framed. The main findings reveal that the dominant regulatory approaches and theoretical interpretations of the problem are mainly based on economic considerations. However, this does not seem to have led to very satisfactory results. Reflecting upon what the sustainability perspective can highlight with reference to healthcare, substantial connections between the orphan drugs issue and that of neglected diseases are highlighted. These connections suggest reframing the orphan drugs issue as a social equality and inclusiveness problem, hence the need to adopt a sustainable and inclusive development perspective. As a key sustainable development goal (SGD) to be shared by all nations, healthcare should always be approached by putting the principles of sustainable and inclusive development at the core of policy makers’ regulatory choices. Accordingly, we think that the orphan drugs issue, like that of neglected diseases, could be better faced by adopting a social equality and inclusiveness perspective.

How Far Have We Come? Challenges to Orphan Drug Access in China, 2011-2017

Rare diseases are an important global public health issue. One significant challenge is to ensure the access to orphan drugs for patients with rare disease. This study aims to evaluate the accessibility of orphan drugs in China. Information pertaining to the availability and costs of each orphan drug in each hospital was obtained from the Chinese Medicine Economic Information database during 2011-2017. We measured the accessibility of orphan drugs from 3 aspects: availability, daily costs, and affordability to patients.The market availability rate of orphan drugs in China was 28.8% by June 30, 2017. The median availability rate at the hospital level was less than 15% but was increasing over time. The cost of a defined daily dose of orphan drugs varied significantly with a decreasing trend in all areas. Less than half of all surveyed orphan drugs had a cost of a defined daily dose no more than residents' average daily income.This study reveals the challenges of access to orphan drugs in China. The availability of marketed orphan drugs in China was relatively low and most orphan drugs placed a heavy financial burden on patients with rare disease. It is necessary to develop legislation for orphan drugs and encourage domestic generics.

Orphan drugs: major development challenges at the clinical stage

Biotechnology has provided powerful tools to assist in research and development (R&D) for rare diseases. However, orphan drug development presents several major challenges and obstacles, such as low disease prevalence, disease severity, small and heterogeneous patient populations, difficulties in patient recruitment, and limited knowledge of the natural history of disease, among others. Several strategies can be used to plan for and overcome these clinical and regulatory challenges, namely improved clinical trial design, improved patient recruitment, and closer collaboration with the regulatory authorities and with patient associations. As growth in the orphan drug market is expected over the next few years, improving its relevance in the global pharmaceutical market, further challenges might present themselves in the development of orphan drugs.

RDAD: A Machine Learning System to Support Phenotype-Based Rare Disease Diagnosis

DNA sequencing has allowed for the discovery of the genetic cause for a considerable number of diseases, paving the way for new disease diagnostics. However, due to the lack of clinical samples and records, the molecular cause for rare diseases is always hard to identify, significantly limiting the number of rare Mendelian diseases diagnosed through sequencing technologies. Clinical phenotype information therefore becomes a major resource to diagnose rare diseases. In this article, we adopted both a phenotypic similarity method and a machine learning method to build four diagnostic models to support rare disease diagnosis. All the diagnostic models were validated using the real medical records from RAMEDIS. Each model provides a list of the top 10 candidate diseases as the prediction outcome and the results showed that all models had a high diagnostic precision (≥98%) with the highest recall reaching up to 95% while the models with machine learning methods showed the best performance. To promote effective diagnosis for rare disease in clinical application, we developed the phenotype-based Rare Disease Auxiliary Diagnosis system (RDAD) to assist clinicians in diagnosing rare diseases with the above four diagnostic models. The system is freely accessible through http://www.unimd.org/RDAD/.