Corrected QT interval during treatment with methadone and buprenorphine--relation to doses and serum concentrations

Opioid Maintenance Therapy: A Review of Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder

The rates of opioid use and opioid related deaths are escalating in the United States. Despite this, evidence-based treatments for Opioid Use Disorder are underutilized. There are three medications FDA approved for treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone. This article reviews the history, criteria, and mechanisms associated with Opioid Use Disorder. Pertinent pharmacology considerations, treatment strategies, efficacy, safety, and challenges of Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone are outlined. Lastly, a practical decision making algorithm is discussed to address pertinent psychiatric and medical comorbidities when prescribing pharmacology for Opioid Use Disorder.

Opioid Agents and Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Literature Review

Opioids are compounds that cause similar effects to morphine by binding to its receptors. Opioids can be synthetic, semi-synthetic, or natural and can easily bind to the receptors of opioids in order to depict their effects, which may vary depending upon the exposure of the drug and its dose. However, several side effects of opioids can also be observed, with the most crucial being their impact on the heart's electrical activity. This review majorly focuses on opioids' impact on the prolongation of the QT curve and their arrhythmogenic susceptibility. Articles published up to the year 2022 in various databases were identified and searched with the use of keywords. Search terms included "cardiac arrhythmias," "QT interval," "opioids," "opioid dependence," and "torsade de pointes (TdP)". These terms highlight the impact of each opioid agent on the activity of the heart on an electrocardiogram. The results of the available data depict that opioids, such as methadone, pose higher risks, even when taken in smaller amounts, and have the capability for QT interval prolongation and TdP development. A variety of opioids, i.e., oxycodone and tramadol, are considered as intermediary risk drugs and can build long QT intervals and TdP in large doses. Several other opioids are considered low-risk drugs, including buprenorphine and morphine, which lead to no production of TdP and QT interval prolongation in daily routine doses. Evidence indicates a high risk of sinus bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, cardiac block, and supra-ventricular arrhythmias in opium consumers. This literature review will play a key role in determining the association between the use of opioids and cardiac arrhythmias. It will further highlight the practical implications of opioids for the management of cardiac issues based on their dose, frequency, and intensity. Moreover, it will also depict the adverse effects of opioids along with their dose-specific relationship. Opioids display disparate cardiac arrhythmogenicity, and methadone contains a greater ability to induce long QT intervals and hazardous arrhythmias at conventional doses. In order to reduce arrhythmogenic risk, opioids taken in large amounts should be monitored with a regular electrocardiogram in high-risk consumers, i.e., patients on opioid maintenance.

Long-acting opioids and cardiovascular diseases: Help or hindrance!

Opioids are widely being used for chronic pain management, cough and diarrhea suppressants, anesthetic agents, and opioid de-addiction therapy. Opioid receptors, present in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues, are documented to regulate several cardiac functions through different signaling pathways. Long-acting opioids (LAO) have been successfully evaluated for their beneficial effects in various cardiovascular diseases viz. myocardial infarction, ischemic reperfusion injuries, atherosclerosis etc. However, on the other hand, several research studies pointed towards the harmful effects of LAOs which are mainly associated with QTc prolongation, torsade de pointes, ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. This review shall familiarize readers with the benefits as well as the harmful effects of long-acting opioids in cardiovascular diseases. We have also provided an overview of cardiac opioid receptors, endogenous cardiac opioid peptides, and regulation of cardiovascular functions by central and cardiac opioid receptors.

The cost of opioid use disorder-related conditions in Medicare

BACKGROUND

Medicare coverage excludes some levels of substance use disorder (SUD) care, such as intensive outpatient and residential treatment. Expanding access to SUD treatment could increase Medicare spending. However, these costs could be offset if SUD treatment resulted in cost savings from reducing SUD-related medical events and SUD-related medical comorbidities.

METHODS

This study estimated cost savings from expanding access to SUD treatment for persons with opioid use disorders (OUD) using three methods. First, we compared total Medicare fee-for-service spending on individuals with OUD and no treatment with OUD medications (MOUD) to Medicare spending on individuals without OUD after matching on age/sex/Medicare-Medicaid eligibility status. Second, we compared Medicare spending on individuals with OUD who received MOUD to spending individuals with OUD who did not receive MOUD. Third, we determined OUD-attributable Medicare spending for comorbid physical and mental conditions with a strong association with OUD.

RESULTS

Beneficiaries with OUD but no MOUD totaled $15.8 billion more than beneficiaries without OUD. Beneficiaries with OUD but no MOUD totaled $12.1 billion more than individuals with OUD and MOUD. Lastly, Medicare spending on OUD-attributable comorbidities was $4.7 billion if all medical and mental health comorbidities were included and $3.0 billion with only medical comorbidities. The totals could be 1.7 times higher if Medicare Advantage enrollees were included.

CONCLUSION

Expanding Medicare coverage of appropriate levels of care could improve access to effective treatment and reduce the costs associated with untreated OUD. This will likely result in substantial Medicare cost savings.

Management of opioid use disorder and associated conditions among hospitalized adults: A Consensus Statement from the Society of Hospital Medicine

Hospital-based clinicians frequently care for patients with opioid withdrawal or opioid use disorder (OUD) and are well-positioned to identify and initiate treatment for these patients. With rising numbers of hospitalizations related to opioid use and opioid-related overdose, the Society of Hospital Medicine convened a working group to develop a Consensus Statement on the management of OUD and associated conditions among hospitalized adults. The guidance statement is intended for clinicians practicing medicine in the inpatient setting (e.g., hospitalists, primary care physicians, family physicians, advanced practice nurses, and physician assistants) and is intended to apply to hospitalized adults at risk for, or diagnosed with, OUD. To develop the Consensus Statement, the working group conducted a systematic review of relevant guidelines and composed a draft statement based on extracted recommendations. Next, the working group obtained feedback on the draft statement from external experts in addiction medicine, SHM members, professional societies, harm reduction organizations and advocacy groups, and peer reviewers. The iterative development process resulted in a final Consensus Statement consisting of 18 recommendations covering the following topics: (1) identification and treatment of OUD and opioid withdrawal, (2) perioperative and acute pain management in patients with OUD, and (3) methods to optimize care transitions at hospital discharge for patients with OUD. Most recommendations in the Consensus Statement were derived from guidelines based on observational studies and expert consensus. Due to the lack of rigorous evidence supporting key aspects of OUD-related care, the working group identified important issues necessitating future research and exploration.

Systematic review of guidelines for managing physical health during treatment for substance use disorders: Implications for the alcohol and other drug workforce

ISSUES

Substance use disorders are associated with significant physical health comorbidities, necessitating an integrated treatment response. However, service fragmentation can preclude the management of physical health problems during addiction treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the recommendations made by clinical practice guidelines for addressing the physical health of people attending alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment.

APPROACH

An iterative search strategy of grey literature sources was conducted from September 2020 to February 2021 to identify clinical practice guidelines. Content pertaining to physical health care during AOD treatment was extracted. Quality of guidelines were appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool.

FINDINGS

Thirty-three guidelines were included for review. Fourteen guidelines were considered high quality based on AGREE-II scores. Neurological conditions (90.9%) and hepatitis (81.8%) were the most frequent health problems addressed. Most guidelines recommended establishing referral pathways to address physical health comorbidities (90.9%). Guidance on facilitating these referral pathways was less common (42.4%). Guidelines were inconsistent in their recommendations related to oral health, tobacco use, physical activity, nutrition and the use of standardised assessment tools.

IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Greater consistency and specificity in the recommendations made for integrating physical health care within addiction treatment is needed. Ensuring that recommendations are applicable to the AOD workforce and to treatment services limited by funding and resource constraints should enhance implementation. Future guideline development groups should consider increased consultation with the AOD workforce and inclusion of clinical tools and decision aids to facilitate referral pathways.

Effects of opioid receptor agonist and antagonist medications on electrocardiogram changes and presentation of cardiac arrhythmia: review article

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Mortality associated with prescription opioids has significantly increased over the past few decades and is considered a global pandemic. Prescribed opioids can cause cardiac arrhythmias, leading to fatal outcomes and unexpected death, even in the absence of structural cardiac disease. Despite the extent of cardiac toxicity and death associated with these medications, there is limited data to suggest their influences on cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, with the exception of methadone. The goal of our review is to describe the possible mechanisms and to review the different ECG changes and arrhythmias that have been reported.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Google Scholar, PubMed, Springer, Ovid, and Science Direct to identify studies that demonstrated the use of prescription opioids leading to electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and cardiac arrhythmias.

RESULTS

Many of the commonly prescribed opioid medications can uniquely effect the ECG, and can lead to the development of various cardiac arrhythmias. One of the most significant side effects of these drugs is QTc interval prolongation, especially when administered to patients with a baseline risk for QTc prolongation. A prolonged QTc interval can cause lethal torsades de pointes and ventricular fibrillation. Obtaining an ECG at baseline, following a dosage increase, or after switching an opioid medication, is appropriate in patients taking certain prescribed opioids. Opioids are often used first line for the treatment of acute and chronic pain, procedural sedation, medication opioid use disorders, and maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the risk of cardiac arrhythmias and to improve patient outcomes, consideration of accurate patient selection, concomitant medications, electrolyte monitoring, and vigilant ECG monitoring should be considered.

Application of Photodynamic Therapy with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid to Extracorporeal Photopheresis in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A First-in-Human Study

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), exposes isolated white blood cells to photoactivatable 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and UVA light to induce the apoptosis of T-cells and, hence, to modulate immune responses. However, 8-MOP-ECP kills diseased and healthy cells with no selectivity and has limited efficacy in many cases. The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and light (ALA-based photodynamic therapy) may be an alternative, as ex vivo investigations show that ALA-ECP kills T-cells from cGvHD patients more selectively and efficiently than those treated with 8-MOP-ECP. The purpose of this phase I-(II) study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ALA-ECP in cGvHD patients. The study included 82 treatments in five patients. One patient was discharged due to the progression of the haematological disease. No significant persistent changes in vital signs or laboratory values were detected. In total, 62 adverse events were reported. Two events were severe, 17 were moderate, and 43 were mild symptoms. None of the adverse events evaluated by the internal safety review committee were considered to be likely related to the study medication. The results indicate that ALA-ECP is safe and is mainly tolerated well by cGvHD patients.

Effect of Heroin on Electrocardiographic Parameters

Fundamento

Atualmente, o vício em heroína é um problema de saúde preocupante, e as informações sobre os efeitos eletrocardiográficos da heroína são limitadas.

Objetivos

O objetivo do presente estudo é investigar os efeitos da dependência de heroína em parâmetros eletrocardiográficos.

Métodos

Um total de 136 indivíduos, incluindo 66 indivíduos que fumam heroína como grupo de estudo e 70 indivíduos saudáveis sem dependência de drogas como grupo de controle, foram incluídos no estudo. Indivíduos que injetam heroína foram excluídos. A avaliação eletrocardiográfica (ECG) dos usuários de heroína foi realizada e comparada com as do grupo controle. Além disso, os ECGs pré e pós-tratamento do grupo usuário de heroína foram comparados. Um valor de p<0,05 foi aceito como estatisticamente significativo.

Resultados

A frequência cardíaca (77,2±12,8 versus 71,4±11,2; p=0,02) foi maior no grupo usuário de heroína em comparação com o grupo controle. Os intervalos QT (341,50±25,80 versus 379,11±45,23; p=0,01), QTc (385,12±29,11 versus 411,3±51,70; p<0,01) e o intervalo do pico ao fim da onda T (Tpe) (65,41±10,82 versus 73,3±10,13; p<0,01) foram significativamente menores no grupo usuário de heroína. Nenhuma diferença foi observada entre os grupos com respeito às razões Tpe/QT e Tpe/QTc. Na análise de subgrupo do grupo usuário de heroína, os intervalos QT (356,81±37,49 versus 381,18±40,03; p<0,01) e QTc (382,06±26,41 versus 396,06±29,80; p<0,01) foram significativamente mais curtos no período pré-tratamento.

Conclusão

O vício em heroína afeta significativamente os intervalos de tempo QT, QTc e Tpe. Os efeitos de arritmia desses parâmetros já são conhecidos. Os parâmetros eletrocardiográficos desses indivíduos merecem mais atenção. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(6):1135-1141)

Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Buprenorphine Pharmacokinetics: A Planned Case Observation

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery may affect the absorption and metabolism of drugs by various mechanisms. We present a planned case observation of a patient treated with sublingual buprenorphine in an opioid maintenance treatment program, and the observed changes in buprenorphine pharmacokinetics following gastric sleeve surgery.

METHODS

Serial blood samples during a dose interval of 24 hours were obtained approximately 1 year preoperatively as well as 1 week, 1 month and 12 months postoperatively and key pharmacokinetic variables were calculated.

FINDINGS

The systemic exposure of buprenorphine (AUC) was relatively stable from the preoperative sampling to 1 week postoperatively (-6.3%), but declined markedly at 1 month (-43%) and 12 months (-42%) postoperatively. The maximum concentration of buprenorphine almost doubled at 1 week postoperatively before returning to baseline values 1 month and 12 months postoperatively.

IMPLICATIONS

This case observation indicates that after sleeve gastrectomy, the systemic exposure of sublingual buprenorphine can decrease. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of loss of effect and emerging abstinence symptoms following sleeve gastrectomy. We recommend monitoring the patient closely for abstinence symptoms postoperatively and considering measuring serum concentrations of buprenorphine pre- and postoperatively.

Safety And Efficacy Of The Unique Opioid Buprenorphine For The Treatment Of Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is associated with decreased quality of life and is one of the most common reasons adults seek medical care, making treatment imperative for many aspects of patient well-being. Chronic pain management typically involves the use of Schedule II full μ-opioid receptor agonists for pain relief; however, the increasing prevalence of opioid addiction is a national crisis that is impacting public health and social and economic welfare. Buprenorphine is a Schedule III partial μ-opioid receptor agonist that is an equally effective but potentially safer treatment option for chronic pain than full μ-opioid receptor agonists. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of the transdermal and buccal formulations of buprenorphine, which are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for chronic pain, compared with that of extended-release full μ-opioid receptor agonists.

METHODS

Controlled or randomized controlled clinical trial information was retrieved from EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed using the search terms "buprenorphine" AND "chronic" AND "pain."

RESULTS

A total of 33 clinical studies were ultimately used in this review, including 29 (88%) on transdermal buprenorphine and 4 (12%) on buprenorphine buccal film. Although the measure of pain intensity varied among studies, each of these 33 trials demonstrated efficacy for buprenorphine in pain relief. A total of 28 studies also assessed safety, with each concluding that buprenorphine was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of current clinical data along with results of responder and safety analyses support the use of buprenorphine over full μ-opioid receptor agonists for effective preferential treatment of chronic pain; however, head-to-head clinical studies are warranted.

Methadone-Related Delirium: Prevalence, Causes, and Outcomes

Goals consist of determining 5-year prevalence and recurrence of methadone-related delirium (MRD), along with causes, treatments, and outcomes. Sample comprised 81 patients in methadone maintenance treatment. Criteria for MRD encompassed delirium with high methadone serum levels plus alleviation of delirium upon lowering methadone serum levels. MRD occurred in 14 cases who had 25 episodes. MRD precipitants included physician prescribing (i.e., excessive methadone or medications slowing methadone metabolism), drug misuse, and renal-fluid alterations. Social affiliation (housing with family, intimate partner) reduced MRD; employment increased MRD. Recovery occurred in 23/25 episodes of MRD; two episodes progressed to dementia. Obtaining serum methadone levels fostered prompt recognition.

Evaluation of the Effects of a Monthly Buprenorphine Depot Subcutaneous Injection on QT Interval During Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

Extensive 12‐lead electrocardiogram monitoring and drug concentrations were obtained during development of BUP‐XR, a monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Matched QT and plasma drug concentrations (11,925) from 1,114 subjects were pooled from 5 studies in OUD. A concentration‐QT model was developed, which accounted for confounding factors (e.g., comedications) affecting heart rate and heart rate‐corrected QT interval (QTc). Bias‐corrected nonparametric two‐sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived for the mean predicted effect of BUP‐XR on QTc (ΔQTc) at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses. Changes in QTc were associated with age, central vs. noncentral reading, sex, methadone, and barbiturates. The upper 90% CI of ΔQTc was 0.29, 0.67, and 1.34 ms at the steady‐state peak concentration (C_max) for 100, 300, and 2 × 300 mg doses, respectively. An effect of BUP‐XR on QT can be ruled out at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of BUP‐XR, after accounting for covariates that may influence heart rate and QT interval in OUD.

Opioids and Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

One of the most important side effects of opioids is their influence on the electrical activity of the heart. This review focusses on the effects of opioids on QT interval prolongation and their arrhythmogenic liability.

METHODS

By using various keywords, papers published up to 2018 in different databases were searched and identified. The search terms were opioids names, corrected QT interval, human-ether-a-go-go gene, torsades de pointes (TdP), cardiac arrhythmias, opioid dependence and other relevant terms. It emphasized the effects of each opioid agent alone on electrocardiogram (ECG) and some interactions.

RESULTS

Available data indicate that some opioids such as methadone are high-risk even at low doses, and have potential for prolongation of the QT interval and development of TdP, a dangerous ventricular tachycardia. A number of opioids such as tramadol and oxycodone are intermediate risk drugs and may develop long QT interval and TdP in high doses. Some other opioids such as morphine and buprenorphine are low-risk drugs and do not produce QT interval prolongation and TdP at least in routine doses. Opium-consumers are at higher risk of supra-ventricular arrhythmias, sinus bradycardia, cardiac block and atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

The cardiac arrhythmogenicity of various opioids is different. Methadone has a higher capability to induce long QT interval and dangerous arrhythmias in conventional doses than others. To reduce of arrhythmogenic risk, high doses of opioids must be used cautiously with periodic monitoring of ECG in high-risk consumers such as patients under opioid maintenance treatment.

Treating Chronic Pain: An Overview of Clinical Studies Centered on the Buprenorphine Option

The buprenorphine receptor binding profile is unique in that it binds to all three major opioid receptors (mu, kappa, delta), and also binds to the orphan-like receptor, the receptor for orphanin FQ/nociceptin, with lower affinity. Within the mu receptor group, buprenorphine analgesia in rodents is dependent on the recently discovered arylepoxamide receptor target in brain, which involves a truncated 6-transmembrane mu receptor gene protein, distinguishing itself from morphine and most other mu opioids. Although originally designed as an analgesic, buprenorphine has mainly been used for opioid maintenance therapy and only now is increasingly recognized as an effective analgesic with an improved therapeutic index relative to certain potent opioids. Albeit a second-, third-, or fourth-line analgesic, buprenorphine is a reasonable choice in certain clinical situations. Transdermal patches and buccal film formulations are now commercially available as analgesics. This review discusses buprenorphine pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, use in certain populations, and provides a synopsis of systematic reviews and randomized analgesic trials. We briefly discuss postoperative management in patients receiving buprenorphine maintenance therapy, opioid equivalence to buprenorphine, rotations to buprenorphine from other opioids, and clinical relevance of buprenorphine-related QTc interval changes.

Utilizing postmortem drug concentrations in mechanistic modeling and simulation of cardiac effects: a proof of concept study with methadone

Methadone-related poisoning has been found to be the leading and increasing cause of death among intoxication cases in several countries. Aside from respiratory depression, methadone is known to cause QT-prolongation, which may lead to sudden cardiac death. Concentrations in heart tissue should be more accurate for estimating cardiotoxic effects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the effect of methadone on the QT-interval could be simulated and whether the concentrations in heart tissues allowed for better prediction of the Bazett corrected QT-interval (QTcB). A predictive performance study was conducted using the simulation platform Cardiac Safety Simulator to mimic five literature studies using their described study conditions. Both free and total plasma and heart concentrations were investigated using two different in silico models: the O'Hara-Rudy (ORD) model and the 10 Tusscher (TNNP) model. The results showed that the QTcB of methadone was best predicted either with total plasma using the TNNP model or with free plasma using the ORD model. The ORD model was highly sensitive to the total heart concentrations, resulting in overprediction of the QTcB. The TNNP model also overpredicted the QTcB, but to a lesser degree than the ORD model. Furthermore, due to a low baseline QTcB, the ORD model underpredicted the QTcB for both the free plasma and free heart concentrations. In conclusion, it is possible to simulate the cardiac effects of methadone, yet several elements influence the approach uncertainty including but not limited to biophysically details model of cardiac electrophysiology, exposure data, and input parameters.

Pain medication and long QT syndrome

Long QT syndrome is a cardiac repolarization disorder and is associated with an increased risk of torsades de pointes. The acquired form is most often attributable to administration of specific medications and/or electrolyte imbalance. This review provides insights into the risk for QT prolongation associated with drugs frequently used in the treatment of chronic pain. In the field of pain medicine all the major drug classes (i.e. NSAIDs, opioids, anticonvulsive and antidepressant drugs, cannabinoids, muscle relaxants) contain agents that increase the risk of QT prolongation. Other substances, not used in the treatment of pain, such as proton pump inhibitors, antiemetics, and diuretics are also associated with long QT syndrome. When the possible benefits of therapy outweigh the associated risks, slow dose titration and electrocardiography monitoring are recommended.

QT interval prolongation in opioid agonist treatment: analysis of continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram recordings

AIMS

Methadone is a widely used opioid agonist treatment associated with QT prolongation and torsades de pointes. We investigated the QT interval in patients treated with methadone or buprenorphine using continuous 12-lead Holter recordings.

METHODS

We prospectively made 24-h Holter recordings in patients prescribed methadone or buprenorphine, compared to controls. After their normal dose a continuous 12-lead Holter recorder was attached for 24 h. Digital electrocardiograms were extracted hourly from the Holter recordings. The QT interval was measured automatically (H-scribe software, Mortara Pty Ltd) and checked manually. The QT interval was plotted against heart rate (HR) on the QT nomogram to determine abnormality. Demographics, dosing, medical history and laboratory investigations were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients (19 methadone, 20 buprenorphine and 19 control); median age 35 years (20-56 years); 33 males. Baseline characteristics were similar. Median dose of methadone was 110 mg day-1 (70-170 mg day-1 ) and buprenorphine was 16 mg day-1 (12-32 mg day-1 ). Seven participants had abnormal QT intervals. There was a significant difference in the proportion of prescribed methadone with abnormal QT intervals, 7/19 (37%; 95% confidence interval: 17-61%), compared to controls 0/19 (0%; 95% confidence interval: 0-21%; P = 0.008), but no difference between buprenorphine and controls (0/20). QT vs. HR plots showed patients prescribed methadone had higher QT-HR pairs over 24 h compared to controls. There was no difference in dose for patients prescribed methadone with abnormal QT intervals and those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Methadone is associated with prolonged QT intervals, but there was no association with dose. Buprenorphine did not prolong the QT interval. Twenty four-hour Holter recordings using the QT nomogram is a feasible method to assess the QT interval in patients prescribed methadone.

Cardiovascular effects of methadone and concomitant use of diazepam during methadone maintenance treatment induction: low concentration risk

BACKGROUND

The aim is to evaluate the role of diazepam concentrations in development of low-concentration-methadone-associated QTc prolongation in patients with opioid use disorder during methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) induction.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Individuals with addiction disorder on MMT were studied before the beginning of MMT and after one and six months of MMT. Serum concentrations of methadone, diazepam, electrolytes and ECG were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled. The mean methadone concentration at time points was 177 ± 119 ng/ml and 343 ± 182 ng/ml, while the mean diazepam concentration was 561 ± 437 ng/ml and 1045 ± 933 ng/ml. The QTc interval before the introduction of MMT, after 1 and 6 months of MMT were 412 ± 27 ms, 425 ± 18 ms and 424 ± 15 ms, respectively, showing statistically significant increase in the length of QTc interval after 1 and 6 months of MMT. Statistically significant correlation between the concentration of methadone and QTc interval length at observed time points (R² = 0.239, p = 0.018; R² = 0.513, p = 0.006) was shown, and it remained so if the concentration of diazepam was included (R² = 0.347, p = 0.026, R² = 0.513, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The prolongation of QTc below the risk threshold in low methadone therapeutic doses has been recorded and concomitant use of diazepam could be a co-factor in such issue.

Methadone maintenance dose/weight ratio, long QTc, and EKG screening

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Electrocardiogram (EKG) monitoring during methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been recommended to prevent potentially fatal prolonged computed QT intervals (QTc). However, risk indicators for obtaining EKGs do not exist. This study assessed 23 variables that might help identify prolonged QTc during MMT.

METHODS

EKGs concurrent with methadone serum levels were obtained from 69 veterans during a 5-year study, encompassing 302.8 person-years. Two cardiologists hand-measured QT intervals, selecting each patient's longest QTc. QTc categories included: normal duration <440 ms; borderline duration of 440-469 ms; and abnormal duration ≥470 ms. QTc's were compared with seven methadone parameters and 16 bio-psycho-social variables using two QTc cut-offs (440 and 470 ms).

RESULTS

Among the 69 patients, 19 had normal QTc's, 28 had borderline QTc's, and 22 had abnormal QTc's. Methadone dose/weight was moderately correlated with QTc, and independently associated with longer QTc at both 440 and 470 cut-offs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Dose/weight ≥.49 is useful for screening EKGs for QTc's ≥440 cut-off. Dose/weight ≥.65 produces high-yield abnormal QTc's ≥470 cut-off.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Methadone dose/weight provides moderately reliable thresholds for making routine screening decisions and urgent clinical decisions to obtain an EKG for prolonged QTc. (Am J Addict 2016;25:499-507).

The Impact of Opioids on Cardiac Electrophysiology

Synthetic opioid agents have been used in modern medicine for over a century and for opioid addiction treatment for over a half-century. Liberal use of opioids in the United States has been attended by an extraordinary increase in opioid-related mortality, with over 16,000 deaths in 2012. As there have been advances in opioid agents for pain and addiction, so have there been advances in our understanding of the cardiac effects of these agents. In the last 10 years, significant data regarding electrophysiologic effects of these agents have been collected. We aim in this review to discuss the effects on cardiac electrophysiology of the various opioid agents currently in use and the evidence that these effects are contributing to the rise in opioid-related mortality.

Bioavailability of Methadone After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Planned Case Observation

OBJECTIVE

Morbidly obese patients on opioid-replacement therapy may be at risk for treatment refusal with regard to bariatric surgery. However, patients on opioid replacement may have the personal skills to facilitate the lifestyle changes required for successful outcomes after bariatric surgery. This planned case observation assessed the effects of sleeve gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetic properties of methadone.

METHODS

A white woman in her 40s on methadone maintenance therapy and with morbid obesity was referred for bariatric surgery. Serial blood samples for methadone concentration measurements were obtained before and at 5 days and 1, 7, and 11 months after surgery.

FINDINGS

Serum methadone concentrations increased from before to 5 days after surgery and continued to increase for 7 months thereafter. The predose measurement at 11 months postoperatively suggests a further increase compared with the previous predose measurements.

IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians should beware the potential for altered effects of methadone after bariatric surgery. We recommend that serum concentrations be routinely measured pre- and postoperatively, and that the dose be adjusted according to these measurements and regular clinical assessments.

Differentiating the Effect of an Opioid Agonist on Cardiac Repolarization From µ-Receptor-mediated, Indirect Effects on the QT Interval: A Randomized, 3-way Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects

PURPOSE

A thorough QT study was conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the effect of buprenorphine hydrochloride administered through a buccal soluble film under coverage of naltrexone to block confounding, secondary QT effects.

METHODS

Healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, partially blinded, 4-way crossover designed study. Subjects received buprenorphine 3 mg with naltrexone, naltrexone alone (with placebo films), placebo (placebo films and placebo naltrexone), and open-label moxifloxacin 400 mg with placebo naltrexone in separate in-house treatment periods. Naltrexone treatment (50 mg) was initiated 12 hours before buprenorphine and was given every 12 hours for a total of 4 doses. ECG data were extracted from a continuous recording predose and serially after dosing on the treatment day. ECG intervals were measured at a central ECG laboratory by using the high-precision QT technique. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate with Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and change-from-predose baseline QTcF (∆QTcF) was analyzed by using a mixed effect model.

FINDINGS

Fifty-eight subjects (35 males) with a mean age of 32 were enrolled into the study. Treatment with buprenorphine 3 mg resulted in a small QT effect with the largest mean naltrexone-corrected ∆QTcF reaching 5.8 msec at 8 hours' postdosing (upper bound of the 90% CI below 10 msec). Exposure response analysis with a linear model demonstrated a significant linear relationship between plasma levels and naltrexone-corrected ∆QTcF, with an estimated mean slope of 0.65 msec per nanogram/milliliter (90% CI, 0.22 to 1.08). Using the exposure response model, an effect on ∆QTcF of 4.5 msec (2.80 to 6.12) can be predicted at the observed geometric peak plasma level after administration of the 3-mg buprenorphine dose in this study (3.6 ng/mL [3.33 to 3.98]). Naltrexone alone did not have a relevant effect on the QTcF interval.

IMPLICATIONS

The present study showed that buprenorphine plasma levels up to 5 ng/mL had no effect on the QTc above the level of clinical concern.

A systematic review of the cardiotoxicity of methadone

Methadone is one of the most popular synthetic opioids in the world with some favorable properties making it useful both in the treatment of moderate to severe pain and for opioid addiction. Increased use of methadone has resulted in an increased prevalence of its toxicity, one aspect of which is cardiotoxicity. In this paper, we review the effects of methadone on the heart as well as cardiac concerns in some special situations such as pregnancy and childhood.

METHODS

We searched for the terms methadone, toxicity, poisoning, cardiotoxicity, heart, dysrhythmia, arrhythmia, QT interval prolongation, torsade de pointes, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) in bibliographical databases including TUMS digital library, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. This review includes relevant articles published between 2000 and 2013. The main cardiac effects of methadone include prolongation of QT interval and torsade de pointes. Other effects include changes in QT dispersion, pathological U waves, Taku-Tsubo syndrome (stress cardiomyopathy), Brugada-like syndrome, and coronary artery diseases. The aim of this paper is to inform physicians and health care staff about these adverse effects. Effectiveness of methadone in the treatment of pain and addiction should be weighed against these adverse effects and physicians should consider the ways to lessen such undesirable effects. This article presents some recommendations to prevent heart toxicity in methadone users.

The QTc effect of low-dose methadone for chronic pain: a prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Methadone is associated with QT prolongation and serious cardiac complications, but this has been primarily demonstrated in opioid dependent patients receiving moderate to high doses. This study investigates the effect of low-dose methadone on the QTc interval in a chronic pain population.

DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

We conducted a prospective cohort study in a chronic pain clinic including 82 patients receiving methadone and 102 patients receiving non-methadone opioid therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed automated QTc calculations from 12-lead electrocardiograms at baseline and during the subsequent 6 months. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of QTc greater than 470 milliseconds or an increase from baseline of greater than 60 milliseconds.

RESULTS

The methadone group did not manifest an overall higher frequency of QTc > 470 milliseconds (6% for the methadone group vs 5% for controls, P = 0.722) or an increase in the QTc of > 60 milliseconds (4% for the methadone group vs 4% for controls, P = 0.94). In the first month after initiating methadone, patients demonstrated an increase in QTc compared to controls (5% for the methadone group vs 0% for the controls, P = 0.073) but the difference disappeared in the third and sixth months.

CONCLUSION

Data from our chronic pain clinic support a potential association of QTc prolongation during the initiation of methadone, but this effect is small and short lived. We believe larger scale studies to further characterize the safety profile of low-dose methadone are warranted.

Methadone safety: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society

Methadone is used for the treatment of opioid addiction and for treatment of chronic pain. The safety of methadone has been called into question by data indicating a large increase in the number of methadone-associated overdose deaths in recent years that has occurred in parallel with a dramatic rise in the use of methadone for chronic pain. The American Pain Society and the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, commissioned an interdisciplinary expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline on safer prescribing of methadone for treatment of opioid addiction and chronic pain. As part of the guideline development process, the American Pain Society commissioned a systematic review of various aspects related to safety of methadone. After a review of the available evidence, the expert panel concluded that measures can be taken to promote safer use of methadone. Specific recommendations include the need to educate and counsel patients on methadone safety, use of electrocardiography to identify persons at greater risk for methadone-associated arrhythmia, use of alternative opioids in patients at high risk of complications related to corrected electrocardiographic QTc interval prolongation, careful dose initiation and titration of methadone, and diligent monitoring and follow-up. Although these guidelines are based on a systematic review, the panel identified numerous research gaps, most recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, and no recommendations were based on high-quality evidence.

PERSPECTIVE

This guideline, based on a systematic review of the evidence on methadone safety, provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Safe use of methadone requires clinical skills and knowledge in use of methadone to mitigate potential risks, including serious risks related to risk of overdose and cardiac arrhythmias.

Methadone overdose and cardiac arrhythmia potential: findings from a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence clinical practice guideline

The number of deaths associated with methadone use increased dramatically in parallel with marked increases in its use, particularly for treatment of chronic pain. To develop a clinical guideline on methadone prescribing to reduce potential harms, the American Pain Society commissioned a review of various aspects related to methadone safety. This article summarizes evidence related to unintentional overdose due to methadone and harms related to cardiac arrhythmia potential. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases through January 2014 for studies assessing harms associated with methadone use; we judged 70 studies to be relevant and to meet inclusion criteria. The majority of studies on overdose and cardiac arrhythmia risk are observational and provide weak evidence on which to base clinical guidelines. In patients prescribed methadone for treatment of opioid dependence, data suggest that mortality benefits related to reduction in illicit drug use outweigh harms. Despite epidemiologic data showing marked increases in the numbers of methadone-related deaths that have been primarily attributed to increased use of methadone for chronic pain, evidence on methadone and mortality risk in this population has been somewhat contradictory. There is some evidence that recent initiation of methadone, psychiatric admissions, and concomitant use of benzodiazepines are associated with a higher risk for overdose. Evidence on cardiac risks is primarily limited to case reports of torsades de pointes, primarily in patients on high doses of methadone, and to studies showing an association between methadone use and prolongation of QTc intervals. Research is needed to understand the effectiveness of dosing methods, electrocardiogram monitoring, and other risk mitigation strategies in patients prescribed methadone.

PERSPECTIVE

This systematic review synthesizes the evidence related to methadone use and risk for overdose and cardiac arrhythmia. Findings regarding the association between methadone use and QTc interval prolongation and risk factors for methadone-associated overdose suggest potential targets for risk mitigation strategies, though research is needed to determine the effectiveness of such strategies at reducing adverse outcomes.

Pharmacogenomics of methadone maintenance treatment

Methadone is the major opioid substitution therapy for opioid dependence. Dosage is highly variable and is often controlled by the patient and prescriber according to local and national policy and guidelines. Nevertheless many genetic factors have been investigated including those affecting its metabolism (CYP2B6-consistent results), efflux transport (P-gp-inconsistent results), target μ-opioid receptor (μ-opioid receptor-inconsistent results) and a host of other receptors (DRD2) and signaling elements (GIRK2 and ARRB2; not replicated). None by themselves have been able to substantially explain dosage variation (the major but not sole end point). When multiple genes have been combined such as ABCB1, CYP2B6, OPRM1 and DRD2 a greater contribution to dosage variation was found but not as yet replicated. As stabilization of dosage needs to be made rapidly, it is imperative that larger internationally based studies be instigated so that genetic contribution to dosage can be properly assessed, which may or may not tailor to different ethnic groups and each country’s policy towards an outcome that benefits all.

QTc interval prolongation for patients in methadone maintenance treatment: a five years follow-up study

BACKGROUND

QTc prolongation for patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been reported. In this study we wanted to identify the predictor factors for QTc prolongation >500 ms and other medical risk factors for mortality in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review study with 55 patients who had previously been included in our performance improvement project and who were eligible to be reviewed. A linear regression model with one-sided p value was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, 41% to 56% of patients had QTc > 450 and <500 ms and 4% to 10% of patients had at least one reading of QTc > 500 ms. This QTc prolongation from baseline showed statistical significance (p < 0.0001). Being diagnosed with congestive heart failure (CHF), elevated HgA1c level and recent cocaine use were significantly associated with QTc prolongation >500 ms. The model as a whole showed statistical significance (F = 3.50, p = 0.02). Being diagnosed with CHF and elevated HgA1c level was significantly associated with mortality. The model as a whole also showed statistical significance (F = 4.63, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that methadone may be associated with QTc prolongation. It identified three risk factors for significant QTc prolongation for patients on MMT which are recent cocaine use, uncontrolled blood glucose and CHF. Two of these three risk facts (uncontrolled blood glucose and CHF) were associated with mortality in this cohort. Patients with these medical co-morbidities may benefit from EKG screening and aggressive treatment of the medical risk factors while taking MMT.