Interaction with the justice system and other factors associated with pregnant women's self-report and continuation of use of marijuana

The Impact of Social Vulnerability on Substance Use Detection Practices in Pregnancy

This study aimed to synthesize current literature regarding the impact of social vulnerability on pregnancy-related substance use detection in the United States and highlight disparities in substance use detection practices. Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, PubMed (includes MEDLINE), and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): (["pregnancy" or "prenatal"] AND ["substance use screening" or "urine toxicology testing" or "toxicology testing" or "urine drug screening" or "CRAFFT" or "4P's" or "4P's Plus" or "NIDA Quick Screen" or "DAST-10" or "SURP-P" or "WIDUS"], AND ("bias" or "disparities" or "social vulnerability"]). The search included systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies, randomized controlled trials, case studies, and qualitative and quantitative research from January 2014 through November 2023. Selected literature was limited to studies published in English, which included a study population of either pregnant individuals or pregnancy health care providers in the United States, and that were focused on inequities in pregnancy substance use detection. Using Covidence, three authors screened abstracts, and two screened full articles for inclusion. The included studies were evaluated for quality of evidence using the mixed methods appraisal tool. The search yielded 4,188 manuscripts; 37 were eligible for full review. A total of 18 manuscripts were included based on the relevancy of the topic. The most common social vulnerability domain identified was minority status (17/18), followed by socioeconomic status (11/18), household characteristics (8/18), and housing type (1/18). Social vulnerability plays a role in substance use detection among pregnant individuals. Most notably, race and ethnicity, age, and public insurance lead to increased rates of detection, though most individual factors need to be studied in greater depth. This study was registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO ID CRD42022352598), the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. KEY POINTS: · Socially vulnerable pregnant individuals are more likely to receive substance use screening or urine toxicology testing.. · Race, ethnicity, age, and insurance influence substance use detection disparities.. · More research is needed to understand how other characteristics influence disparities in substance use detection..

Exposure to maternal cannabis use disorder and risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring: A data linkage cohort study

This study aimed to investigate the association between pre-pregnancy, prenatal and perinatal exposures to cannabis use disorder (CUD) and the risk of autism spectrum disoder (ASD) in offspring. Data were drawn from the New South Wales (NSW) Perinatal Data Collection (PDC), population-based, linked administrative health data encompassing all-live birth cohort from January 2003 to December 2005. This study involved 222 534 mother-offspring pairs. . The exposure variable (CUD) and the outcome of interest (ASD) were identified using the 10th international disease classification criteria, Australian Modified (ICD-10-AM). We found a three-fold increased risk of ASD in the offspring of mothers with maternal CUD compared to non-exposed offspring. In our sensitivity analyses, male offspring have a higher risk of ASD associated with maternal CUD than their female counterparts. In conclusion, exposure to maternal CUD is linked to a higher risk of ASD in offspring, with a stronger risk in male offspring. Further research is needed to understand these gender-specific effects and the relationship between maternal CUD and ASD risk in children.

Exploration of Differences between Women Who Do and Do Not Disclose Their Marijuana Use during Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore demographic and health-related factors that may differentiate women who do and do not disclose their marijuana use during pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

The current study is a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort of pregnant women identified as using marijuana during pregnancy via a variety of assessment tools including self-report, urine screen, and obstetrics record abstraction. The cohort included a convenience sample of women recruited from several antenatal clinics at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC). To be eligible, women needed to be within the first or second trimester of their pregnancy, 16 to 50 years of age, able to communicate in English, and intended to deliver at OSUWMC. Chi-square, independent samples t-tests, and logistic regression analyses were used to explore differences between those who did and did not disclose their use in relation to physical and mental health diagnoses, adverse experiences, use of other substances, and demographics.

RESULTS

Women who used marijuana during their pregnancy and had mental/physical health data available comprised the current sample (n = 109). Women who attended college were more likely to disclose their marijuana use compared with women who did not attend college (p < 0.001). Women who experienced homelessness (p < 0.01) or self-reported alcohol use during pregnancy (p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to disclose their marijuana use.

CONCLUSION

Findings, suggesting disclosure of other substance use and adverse experiences, such as homelessness, may increase the likelihood that pregnant women will voluntarily disclose their marijuana use to providers. Findings did not reflect racial differences nor significant differences in mental/physical health status among women based on their disclosure. Future research with larger datasets is needed to build on these findings by confirming results, as well as exploring additional factors, that may more effectively differentiate women who are unlikely to disclose their prenatal marijuana use from those who do disclose their use.

KEY POINTS

· Women with higher education were more likely to self-disclose their prenatal marijuana use.. · Women who experienced homelessness were more likely to self-disclose their prenatal marijuana use.. · Self-disclosure of prenatal alcohol use was related to self-disclosure of prenatal marijuana use.

How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review

Legal problems encompass issues requiring resolution through the justice system. This social risk factor creates barriers in accessing services and increases risk of poor health outcomes. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed English-language health literature following the PRISMA guidelines sought to answer the question, how has the concept of patients' "legal problems" been operationalized in healthcare settings? Eligible articles reported the measurement or screening of individuals for legal problems in a United States healthcare or clinical setting. We abstracted the prevalence of legal problems, characteristics of the sampled population, and which concepts were included. 58 studies reported a total of 82 different measurements of legal problems. 56.8% of measures reflected a single concept (e.g., incarcerated only). The rest of the measures reflected two or more concepts within a single reported measure (e.g., incarcerations and arrests). Among all measures, the concept of incarceration or being imprisoned appeared the most frequently (57%). The mean of the reported legal problems was 26%. The literature indicates that legal concepts, however operationalized, are very common among patients. The variation in measurement definitions and approaches indicates the potential difficulties for organizations seeking to address these challenges.

Reported Reasons for Cannabis Use Before and After Pregnancy Recognition

OBJECTIVES

Cannabis use is cautioned against during pregnancy, yet many pregnant people continue to use. This study aimed to evaluate the patterns and reasons for cannabis use before and after conception in pregnant people who screened positive for cannabis use at initiation of prenatal care.

METHODS

Pregnant patients at 1 prenatal practice in Baltimore, MD, who either self-reported cannabis use or tested positive on urine toxicology were approached for enrollment. Those who consented were given an anonymous survey with multiple choice questions regarding frequency and reasons for use before and after pregnancy recognition. Fisher exact, χ 2 test, and analysis of variance were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 117 pregnant people approached, 105 enrolled in the study. Of the 105 respondents, 40 (38.1%) reported complete abstinence after pregnancy recognition, whereas 65 (61.9%) reported continued use. Of the respondents who continued cannabis use, 35 (53.8%) had decreased frequency of use or quit, 26 (40%) reported no change in frequency of use, and 4 (6.2%) reported increase in frequency of use. Those who considered their use medical or mixed before pregnancy were 4 times as likely to continue use compared with those who considered their use nonmedical (66.7% vs 33.3%; odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.8). Respondents who continued use after pregnancy recognition were significantly more likely to discuss their use with their obstetrician (89.2% vs 50%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reasons for use frequently changed after recognition of pregnancy. Most people who continued use during pregnancy reported that their reasons were for symptom control.

Effect of maternal adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and cannabis use on pregnancy outcomes

This study aimed to characterize the relationship between cannabis use, ACE score, and pregnancy outcomes. Pregnant patients in Baltimore, MD, completed the 17-point ACE checklist. Charts of the birth parent and neonate were reviewed for urine toxicology testing at initiation of care and delivery, prenatal care metrics, and birth statistics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between ACE score, cannabis use, and pregnancy outcomes. Of 256 birth parents, 87 (34.0%) tested positive for cannabis at initial visit and 39 (15.2%) tested positive for cannabis at delivery. Testing positive for cannabis at initial visit or delivery was associated with higher ACE score (15.1 vs 13.7, p = 0.04; 16.2 vs 13.8, p = 0.01). Of those who tested positive for cannabis at initial visit, 39/87 (45.0%) tested positive at delivery. Continued cannabis use at delivery was associated with lower maternal weight gain (7.9 kg vs 13.3 kg, p = 0.003), fewer prenatal visits (7 vs 8, p = 0.010), and numerically higher mean ACE score. Cannabis use at delivery was associated with 10% lower birthweight (2665 g vs 3014 g p < 0.05) but not with pre-term birth. Total ACE score was not significantly associated with any birth outcome. Worse pregnancy outcomes were associated with cannabis use throughout pregnancy but not with cannabis use at prenatal care initiation. The interplay of ACE and continued cannabis use during pregnancy warrants further research on the physiologic effects of cannabis and interventions to decrease substance use during pregnancy.

"You still have that fear": Policy constraints on informed decision making about legalized cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation

BACKGROUND

Cannabis is the most commonly used drug during pregnancy, excluding alcohol and tobacco, in the United States. Cannabis consumption during pregnancy is increasing along with greater legal and social acceptance.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 23 in-depth interviews with pregnant and lactating people in Massachusetts, a state that legalized cannabis for adult use in 2016. Our aim was to explore how policy constrains or facilitates people's ability to make informed decisions about cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation. Our analysis was conducted using an ecosocial approach, recognizing that the implementation and interpretation of cannabis policy can be understood at multiple levels, which interact with each other and shape the health and experiences of individuals. Additionally, this analysis was informed by a harm reduction approach in which we acknowledge the complexity surrounding cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation, while attempting to identify ways to reduce potentially harmful consequences.

RESULTS

Findings revealed that, despite the legal status of cannabis, there continues to be a lack of clarity for pregnant and lactating people regarding the legal implications of cannabis use. Inconsistent state and institutional policies about drug testing of mothers and newborns leave a cloud of fear hanging over the experiences of people who use cannabis and inhibit their ability to obtain expert advice from healthcare providers.

CONCLUSION

Decision makers in public and institutional policy should work to clarify and update policies regarding substance use during pregnancy following legalization of a new substance, and ensure that pregnant and lactating people are afforded the same legal protections as the general population.

Validity of self-report measures of cannabis use compared to biological samples among women of reproductive age: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Most existing evidence about the prevalence of prenatal cannabis use relies on self-reported measures, which is limited by social desirability bias and recall bias. To date, several studies have examined the validity of self-reported measures of prenatal cannabis use, but this evidence has yet to be synthesized. To address this gap, we performed a scoping review to systematically identify and synthesize existing evidence on the validity of self-reported measures of cannabis use among pregnant women.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, PyschINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane/CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies published in English between January 2010 and June 2021. We included studies that compared self-reported measures of cannabis use to a biochemical measure of cannabis (e.g., urine, hair, meconium) in pregnant women. We excluded studies reporting solely on prenatal cannabis use prevalence as well as those that examined self-reported drug use in which cannabis use was not a distinct category.

RESULTS

We found 12 unique studies (11 primary studies and one systematic review) that examined the validity of self-reported prenatal cannabis use, compared to a biochemical sample. Most studies were conducted in the US and conducted in either a hospital or clinical setting. We found that self-report was more valid in populations with a current or prior history of drug use. Self-report was also more valid when assessed via interviews by research team members than health care provider screenings or self-administered surveys. The most commonly used biochemical measure used was urine drug testing, which was found to have the highest level of concordance with self-report.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review systematically mapped existing evidence on the validity of self-reported prenatal cannabis use. Although much remains unknown in this area, an important next step is a systematic review that would provide robust evidence on clinical utilization of self-reported use in conjunction with biochemical samples. Further research is needed to examine validity by type of measure and mode of administration. Additionally, future studies could assess factors associated with disclosure of use across different critical maternal health periods beyond pregnancy.

Serious psychological distress and cannabis use among pregnant women in the United States: Findings from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health, 2015-2018

BACKGROUND

Cannabis use in pregnancy has been shown to be associated with a past diagnosis of mental health disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the association between serious psychological distress (SPD) and cannabis use in pregnant women in the United States.

METHODS

Using cross-sectional data from the 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), we compared likelihood of cannabis use among pregnant women who reported acute, recent or no SPD based on the Kessler K-6 Distress Scale. Weighted analyses were conducted to describe study population and differences in cannabis use patterns in women with SPD compared to those without. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to determine whether the relationship between SPD and cannabis use differed by acute, recent or no SPD status.

RESULTS

Our final study sample consisted of 2,277,425 pregnant women. In adjusted analyses, pregnant women with any SPD (acute or recent) had 3.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.1, 4.5) times the odds of being current cannabis users compared to pregnant women without SPD. Compared to those with no SPD, pregnant women adjusted with acute SPD had 3.9 (2.5, 6.1) the adjusted odds and recent SPD had 2.4 (1.3, 4.4) times the odds of being current cannabis users. Cannabis use rates in each trimester were significantly higher in women with SPD compared to women without.

CONCLUSION

Women who report recent or acute SPD are significantly more likely to use cannabis during all trimesters of pregnancy than those who report no SPD.

Association between continued cannabis use during pregnancy and symptoms of anxiety and depression

Cannabis use in pregnancy is common, as are mental health disorders, but the association between the two is not well established. This study is a single-site retrospective cohort. Urine testing for cannabis was evaluated at two-time points to categorize women as having never used, quit or continued to use. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) screen results were compared across groups using multinomial logistic regression. In addition, EPDS and GAD change scores between initiation of care and delivery were analyzed. 604 women were included, 221 (36.3%) with positive toxicology testing for cannabis at the initiation of care. Women who continued cannabis use were significantly more likely to have elevated GAD and EPDS scores (2.55 [1.31, 4.99]) and EPDS score (2.75 [1.43, 5.28]), respectively as compared to those with no use. No significant differences were found between groups in GAD or EPDS change scores t women with higher depression scores on the EPDS had 2.70 times the odds of being in the continuous use group compared to the quit using group (aOR = 2.70, 95% CI = [1.30, 5.88]). Both anxiety and depression symptoms were found to be associated with cannabis use and continued use during pregnancy.

Demographic Discrepancies in Prenatal Urine Drug Screening in Washington State Surrounding Recreational Marijuana Legalization and Accessibility

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated demographic patterns related to prenatal cannabinoid urine drug screening (UDS) over a 5-year period during which recreational marijuana was legalized and became accessible in Washington State.

METHODS

Using electronic health record data, we performed a retrospective analysis for deliveries occurring over a 5-year period that encapsulated the transitions to marijuana legalization and legal access. For three cohorts of women delivering prior to legalization, between legalization and accessibility, and following accessibility, the UDS completion rate and screening demographic characteristics were assessed using Chi-squared tests and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

25,514 deliveries occurred between March 2011 and March 2016. A significantly higher percentage of women underwent UDS post-accessibility (24.5%) compared to pre-legalization (20.0%, p < 0.001). A corresponding increase was not observed in the percentage of marijuana-positive UDS in tested patients (22.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.86). African American women had 2.8 times higher odds than Latinas of being tested, 2.1 times higher odds than Asian women, 1.7 times higher odds than White women, and 1.4 times higher odds than women of other races (all p < 0.001). Subsidized insurance status was also strongly associated with increased likelihood of testing (aOR = 3.5, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Prenatal UDS testing patterns changed as recreational marijuana possession and accessibility became legal. Demographic discrepancies in testing reveal biases related to race and insurance status, which may be a proxy for socioeconomic status. As such discrepancies are potential contributors to health outcome disparities, it is important for providers and health care systems to examine their practices and ensure they are being appropriately, equally, and justly applied.

The association of cannabis use late in pregnancy with engagement and retention in perinatal substance use disorder care for opioid use disorder: A cohort comparison

BACKGROUND

Prenatal use of cannabis and opioids are increasing and very concerning. Engagement and retention in comprehensive, perinatal substance use disorder (PSUD) care are associated with better outcomes for mothers and babies. We compared the characteristics and engagement in care among women with opioid use disorder who used cannabis late in pregnancy versus those who didn't.

METHODS

The primary outcome, "overall engagement and retention in PSUD care" included: utilization of substance use treatment prenatally, negative screening/toxicology at delivery (excluding cannabis), and attendance at expected prenatal and postpartum visits. Cannabis use late in pregnancy was objectively assessed at delivery via maternal urine drug screen and/or neonatal meconium/cord toxicology. Between-group comparisons utilized chi square, t-test or Mann-Whitney. Associations were assessed using Spearman Rho and two multivariate, binary logistic regressions for cannabis use and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

18.0% (85/472) consumed cannabis late in pregnancy. Women of color, younger women, and those diagnosed with concurrent cannabis use disorder were more likely to consume cannabis. Engagement and retention in PSUD care was not associated with cannabis use, but rather, with prescribed pharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders. The use of prescribed buprenorphine+naloxone was associated with cannabis avoidance late in pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis use late in pregnancy, compared to none, did not impact engagement and retention in our PSUD program. Adjunctive psychotropic medication and/or buprenorphine+naloxone prescription were associated with cannabis avoidance suggesting the use and interactions of pharmacotherapies in an opioid dependent population is complex. A shared decision-making process during PSUD care is warranted.

Pregnant Women's Acceptability of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use Screening and Willingness to Disclose Use in Prenatal Care

PURPOSE

Despite the prevalence of alcohol, tobacco, and other drug (ATOD) use screening as part of prenatal care, pregnant women's perspectives on screening are largely absent from research and clinical practice. This study examines pregnant women's acceptability of ATOD screening and willingness to disclose their ATOD use in prenatal care.

METHODS

Pregnant women completed a self-administered survey and structured interview at four prenatal care facilities in Louisiana and Maryland (N = 589). Participants reported the acceptability of screening and their willingness to honestly disclose their ATOD use to their provider. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, tests of proportions, simple regression models, and coding of open-ended responses.

RESULTS

Nearly all pregnant women found screening acceptable for alcohol (97%), tobacco (98%), and other drug use (97%) during prenatal care. The acceptability of alcohol use screening was higher among those who reported binge drinking (98% vs. 96%; p = .002) and risky alcohol consumption (99% vs. 96%; p = .018). The acceptability of screening for other drugs was higher among women reporting binge drinking (98% vs. 96%; p = .032) and other drug use (98% vs. 96%; p = .058). Almost all pregnant women indicated that they were willing to disclose their alcohol (99%), tobacco (99%), and other drug use (98%) to their provider.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all women considered verbal screening for ATOD use during prenatal care acceptable and indicated that they were willing to honestly disclose their ATOD use. Verbal screening may allow for the opportunity to initiate safe, nonjudgmental conversations about women's substance use, risk, and goals for their ATOD use, pregnancy, and parenting.

The impact of state legalization on rates of marijuana use in pregnancy in a universal drug screening population

Objective: To evaluate the effect of state legalization of rate on marijuana use in pregnancy in a population with universal drug screening.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from July 2016 to December 2018 of pregnant women who had universal drug screening of marijuana use before and after legalization of recreational marijuana in California on 1 January 2018. Maternal medical conditions and neonatal outcomes associated with usage were also evaluated. Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multiple linear regression were used for statistical analyses.Results: Of 466 women, initial marijuana usage in pregnancy confirmed by urine drug test increased after legalization from 6 to 11% (p = .05). Factors associated with marijuana usage included younger age, white or black race, single marital status, psychiatric disorders, intimate partner violence and concomitant tobacco and alcohol use. 73% of users in this study had cessation of marijuana use with subsequent negative UDT. There was no statistical difference in rates of preterm birth, small for gestational age, NICU admission, or Apgar scores, when adjusted for other risk factors. Conclusion: Rates of marijuana usage in pregnant women who underwent universal drug screening increased after legalization. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes between users and non-users.