Is implementation of ASAM-based addiction treatment assessments associated with improved 30-day retention and substance use?

Sex differences in variables affecting short-term success in substance use disorder treatment

Because of the stigma surrounding patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and difficulties with follow-up, data on outcomes is limited. We explore real-world data from a prospectively collected database to determine characteristics that contribute to the completion of acute treatment. Our cohort consisted of data from 1039 patients treated at a single facility. Success was defined as successful discharge from the program. Failure was defined as relapse or signing out against medical advice during treatment. We examined 43 distinct features collected at time of treatment using multivariate analysis. In the total cohort and both sexes, longer length of stay (p ≤ 0.01) was linked to treatment failure. When we examined the cohort by sex, variables associated with success and failure differed between groups. Among females, goal-directed thinking (p ≤ 0.05) correlated with treatment success. Taking unnecessary risks (p < 0.05), having a detailed suicide plan (p ≤ 0.001), and constricted thinking (p ≤ 0.01) predicted treatment failure. In males, prior arrest for driving under the influence (p ≤ 0.05), and presence of phobias, paranoias, and delusions (p ≤ 0.05) were associated with treatment failure. Identifying patients prone to acute therapy failure may guide more personalized treatment, thereby increasing success rates. When considering SUD treatments for patients, we must stratify based on patient characteristics.

Substance Abuse Treatment, Critical Race Theory, and Counter-Storytelling, for the Black Emerging Adult Male

Black-emerging adult males face many barriers to the effective engagement in substance abuse treatment including stigma, lack of access to resources, and engagement with the criminal justice system. This case study introduces a group therapy and counter-storytelling intervention to understand and effectively mitigate some of these barriers. Counter-storytelling, derived from critical race theory (CRT) framework, focuses on marginalized individuals sharing how various aspects of society impact them, which is often different from the majority narrative. Through this intervention, Black-emerging adult males discussed the challenges they face when engaging in treatment, coping skills for barriers they face, and overcoming stigma of substance abuse recovery. Using a group therapy and counter-storytelling intervention, clinicians can begin to suspend how they traditionally think about treatment for Black-emerging adult males and engage in more effective practices to support this population.

Impact of Illness Severity Tools on Adolescent Psychiatric Managed Care in California

Youth with mental illness struggle to receive essential behavioral health care. One obstacle is denial of coverage by insurance. In California, managed care consumers may apply for independent medical review (IMR) which potentially overturns an insurance denial through the California Department of Managed Healthcare (CDMHC). The authors aim to analyze IMR appeals for psychiatric treatment among adolescents and elucidate factors associated with obtaining coverage of care. We performed an analysis to identify factors that are associated with depression and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment claim denials in 11-20-year-olds from 2001 to 2022 using CDMHC data. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify specific factors related to claim characteristics and medical society instruments that are significantly associated with overturning a denial by IMR. Behavioral health IMRs are overturned at a higher rate than non-behavioral health claims. 54.5% of those with depression and 36.3% of those with SUD initially denied care coverage were overturned by IMR. For those seeking depression treatment, we found a significantly greater odds of overturn by IMR if there was a reference of CALOCUS [1.64, 95%CI (1.06-2.5)]. The odds of a SUD treatment denial being overturned was significantly greater if referencing CALOCUS [3.85 (1.54-9.62)] or ASAM [2.47, [4.3 (1.77-10.47)]. After the standardized implementation of illness severity tools in IMRs, the odds of a medically necessary claim being overturned was 2.5 times higher than before the standards. With a high percentage of claims being overturned after IMR, the findings suggest that health plans inappropriately deny medically necessary behavioral health treatment. The use of medical society instruments was associated with higher odds of overturning a denial. The recent decision of CDMHC to implement standard use of CALOCUS and similar illness severity criteria is supported by our findings and may facilitate more equitable care.

Translating Medicaid policy into practice: policy implementation strategies from three US states' experiences enhancing substance use disorder treatment

BACKGROUND

Despite the important upstream impact policy has on population health outcomes, few studies in implementation science in health have examined implementation processes and strategies used to translate state and federal policies into accessible services in the community. This study examines the policy implementation strategies and experiences of Medicaid programs in three US states that responded to a federal prompt to improve access to evidence-based practice (EBP) substance use disorder (SUD) treatment.

METHODS

Three US state Medicaid programs implementing American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Criteria-driven SUD services under Section 1115 waiver authority were used as cases. We conducted 44 semi-structured interviews with Medicaid staff, providers and health systems partners in California, Virginia, and West Virginia. Interviews were triangulated with document review of state readiness and implementation plans. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment Framework (EPIS) guided qualitative theme analysis. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change and Specify It criteria were used to create a taxonomy of policy implementation strategies used by policymakers to promote providers' uptake of statewide EBP SUD care continuums.

RESULTS

Four themes describe states' experiences and outcomes implementing a complex EBP SUD treatment policy directive: (1) Medicaid agencies adapted their inner/outer contexts to align with EBPs and adapted EBPs to fit their local context; (2) enhanced financial reimbursement arrangements were inadequate bridging factors to achieve statewide adoption of new SUD services; (3) despite trainings, service providers and managed care organizations demonstrated poor fidelity to the ASAM Criteria; and (4) successful policy adoption at the state level did not guarantee service providers' uptake of EBPs. States used 29 implementation strategies to implement EBP SUD care continuums. Implementation strategies were used in the Exploration (n=6), Preparation (n=10), Implementation (n=19), and Sustainment (n=6) phases, and primarily focused on developing stakeholder interrelationships, evaluative and iterative approaches, and financing.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enhances our understanding of statewide policy implementation outcomes in low-resource, public healthcare settings. Themes highlight the need for additional pre-implementation and sustainment focused implementation strategies. The taxonomy of detailed policy implementation strategies employed by policymakers across states should be tested in future policy implementation research.