1
|
Sharif A, Chakkera H, de Vries APJ, Eller K, Guthoff M, Haller MC, Hornum M, Nordheim E, Kautzky-Willer A, Krebs M, Kukla A, Kurnikowski A, Schwaiger E, Montero N, Pascual J, Jenssen TG, Porrini E, Hecking M. International consensus on post-transplantation diabetes mellitus. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2024; 39:531-549. [PMID: 38171510 PMCID: PMC11024828 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) remains a leading complication after solid organ transplantation. Previous international PTDM consensus meetings in 2003 and 2013 provided standardized frameworks to reduce heterogeneity in diagnosis, risk stratification and management. However, the last decade has seen significant advancements in our PTDM knowledge complemented by rapidly changing treatment algorithms for management of diabetes in the general population. In view of these developments, and to ensure reduced variation in clinical practice, a 3rd international PTDM Consensus Meeting was planned and held from 6-8 May 2022 in Vienna, Austria involving global delegates with PTDM expertise to update the previous reports. This update includes opinion statements concerning optimal diagnostic tools, recognition of prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance), new mechanistic insights, immunosuppression modification, evidence-based strategies to prevent PTDM, treatment hierarchy for incorporating novel glucose-lowering agents and suggestions for the future direction of PTDM research to address unmet needs. Due to the paucity of good quality evidence, consensus meeting participants agreed that making GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) recommendations would be flawed. Although kidney-allograft centric, we suggest that these opinion statements can be appraised by the transplantation community for implementation across different solid organ transplant cohorts. Acknowledging the paucity of published literature, this report reflects consensus expert opinion. Attaining evidence is desirable to ensure establishment of optimized care for any solid organ transplant recipient at risk of, or who develops, PTDM as we strive to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan Sharif
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Harini Chakkera
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States of America
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Eller
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz Austria
| | - Martina Guthoff
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria C Haller
- Ordensklinikum Linz, Elisabethinen Hospital, Department of Medicine III, Nephrology, Hypertension, Transplantation, Rheumatology, Geriatrics, Linz, Austria
- Medical University of Vienna, CeMSIIS, Section for Clinical Biometrics, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mads Hornum
- Department of Nephrology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Espen Nordheim
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Nydalen, Norway
- Department of Nephrology, Oslo University Hospital-Ullevål, Oslo, Nydalen, Norway
| | - Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Krebs
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Amelie Kurnikowski
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Schwaiger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brothers of Saint John of God Eisenstadt, Eisenstadt, Austria
| | - Nuria Montero
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, University of Barcelona, Barcelona Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Institute Mar for Medical Research-IMIM, Barcelona,Spain
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Trond G Jenssen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Nydalen, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Esteban Porrini
- Instituto de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB), University of La Laguna, Research Unit Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Manfred Hecking
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Center for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Kuratorium for Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation (KfH), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lawrence SE, Chandran MM, Park JM, Sweiss H, Jensen T, Choksi P, Crowther B. Sweet and simple as syrup: A review and guidance for use of novel antihyperglycemic agents for post-transplant diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14922. [PMID: 36708369 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) increase morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. Conventional strategies for diabetes management in this population include metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides and insulin. Limitations with these agents, as well as promising new antihyperglycemic agents, create a need and opportunity to explore additional options for transplant diabetes pharmacotherapy. Novel agents including sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i) demonstrate great promise for T2DM management in the non-transplant population. Moreover, many of these agents possess renoprotective, cardiovascular, and/or weight loss benefits in addition to improved glucose control while having reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with certain other conventional agents. This comprehensive review examines available literature evaluating the use of novel antihyperglycemic agents in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with T2DM or PTDM. Formal grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system recommendations are provided to guide incorporation of these agents into post-transplant care. Available literature was evaluated to address the clinical questions of which agents provide greatest short- and long-term benefits, timing of novel antihyperglycemic therapy initiation after transplant, monitoring parameters for these antihyperglycemic agents, and concomitant antihyperglycemic agent and immunosuppression regimen management. Current experience with novel antihyperglycemic agents is primarily limited to single-center retrospective studies and case series. With ongoing use and increasing comfort, further and more robust research promises greater understanding of the role of these agents and place in therapy for kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Elise Lawrence
- Univeristy of Colorado School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Mary Moss Chandran
- Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeong M Park
- University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Helen Sweiss
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services, University Health System, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Thomas Jensen
- University of Colorado Department of Medicine - Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Palak Choksi
- University of Colorado Department of Medicine - Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Barrett Crowther
- Univeristy of Colorado School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prasad GVR, Bhamidi V. Managing cardiovascular disease risk in South Asian kidney transplant recipients. World J Transplant 2021; 11:147-160. [PMID: 34164291 PMCID: PMC8218347 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i6.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
South Asians (SA) are at higher cardiovascular risk than other ethnic groups, and SA kidney transplant recipients (SA KTR) are no exception. SA KTR experience increased major adverse cardiovascular events both early and late post-transplantation. Cardiovascular risk management should therefore begin well before transplantation. SA candidates may require aggressive screening for pre-transplant cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to their ethnicity and comorbidities. Recording SA ethnicity during the pre-transplant evaluation may enable programs to better assess cardiovascular risk, thus allowing for earlier targeted peri- and post-transplant intervention to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Diabetes remains the most prominent post-transplant cardiovascular risk factor in SA KTR. Diabetes also clusters with other metabolic syndrome components including lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, higher triglycerides, hypertension, and central obesity in this population. Dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and obesity are all significant CVD risk factors in SA KTR, and contribute to increased insulin resistance. Novel biomarkers such as adiponectin, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) may be especially important to study in SA KTR. Focused interventions to improve health behaviors involving diet and exercise may especially benefit SA KTR. However, there are few interventional clinical trials specific to the SA population, and none are specific to SA KTR. In all cases, understanding the nuances of managing SA KTR as a distinct post-transplant group, while still screening for and managing each CVD risk factor individually in all patients may help improve the long-term success of all kidney transplant programs catering to multi-ethnic populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5C 2T2, ON, Canada
| | - Vaishnavi Bhamidi
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5C 2T2, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|