Plasma neurofilament light chain protein as a predictor of days in delirium and deep sedation, mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients

Exploring the correlation between paediatric narcolepsy and serum neurofilament light chain levels: An exploratory study

BACKGROUND

The study seeks to assess serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in paediatric narcolepsy-diagnosed patients. Moreover, it aims to explore the correlation between NfL levels and the severity of narcolepsy symptoms, sleep quality, and manifestations of anxiety and depression.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 98 paediatric narcolepsy cases and 100 controls matched for age and gender. The study focused on comparing serum NfL levels across these groups. Severity of EDS in patients was measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Moreover, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-24 (HAMD-24), and Hamilton Anxiety Scale-14 (HAMA-14) were used to assess narcolepsy symptoms, sleep quality, and psychological conditions.

RESULTS

Patients with paediatric narcolepsy had significantly higher serum NfL levels than controls (P < 0.05). Additionally, a positive correlation was found between serum NfL levels and ESS scores (P < 0.001). An independent link between serum NfL and paediatric narcolepsy was established via multiple logistic regression (OR = 0.943, 95 % CI = 0.921-0.993, P = 0.004). Moreover, serum NfL's diagnostic precision for paediatric narcolepsy was evident from the ROC curve area of 0.938 (95 % CI: 0.86-0.99, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study implies a positive correlation between increased serum NfL levels and the severity of paediatric narcolepsy. Nevertheless, the causative link between serum NfL levels and paediatric narcolepsy remains uncertain, highlighting the need for larger sample sizes and well-structured cohort studies to offer more definitive.

Delirium pathophysiology in cancer: neurofilament light chain biomarker - narrative review

Background Delirium is a debilitating disorder with high prevalence near the end of life, impacting quality of life of patients and their relatives. Timely recognition of delirium can lead to prevention and/or better treatment of delirium. According to current hypotheses delirium is thought to result from aberrant inflammation and neurotransmission, with a possible role for neuronal damage. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a protein biomarker in body fluids that is unique to neurons, with elevated levels when neurons are damaged, making NfL a viable biomarker for early detection of delirium. This narrative review summarises current research regarding the pathophysiology of delirium and the potential of NfL as a susceptibility biomarker for delirium and places this in the context of care for patients with advanced cancer.Results Six studies were conducted exclusively on NfL in patients with delirium. Three of these studies demonstrated that high plasma NfL levels preoperatively predict delirium in older adult patients postoperatively. Two studies demonstrated that high levels of NfL in intensive care unit (ICU) patients are correlated with delirium duration and severity. One study found that incident delirium in older adult patients was associated with increased median NfL levels during hospitalisation.Conclusions Targeted studies are required to understand if NfL is a susceptibility biomarker for delirium in patients with advanced cancer. In this palliative care context, better accessible matrices, such as saliva or urine, would be helpful for repetitive testing. Improvement of biological measures for delirium can lead to improved early recognition and lay the groundwork for novel therapeutic strategies.

Serum total tau, neurofilament light, and glial fibrillary acidic protein are associated with mortality in a population study

BACKGROUND

Total tau (t-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are neuronal cytoskeletal biomarkers that may indicate greater risk of poor outcomes in age-related conditions, including mortality. Health disparities experienced by some racial minority subgroups may influence biomarker expression and effects on longevity. We aimed to examine (a) associations of serum t-tau, NfL, and GFAP with overall and cardiovascular mortality and (b) differences in associations by racial background.

METHODS

Data came from 1327 older participants from the Chicago Health and Aging Project (CHAP), a longitudinal population-based study. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine associations between concentrations of serum t-tau, NfL, and GFAP biomarker(s) and mortality (overall/cardiovascular mortality based on age at death). Interaction terms were used to examine differences between African-American and European-American participants. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education, the APOE-ε4 allele, body mass index, chronic health conditions, and cognitive and physical functioning.

RESULTS

Models showed that fivefold higher concentrations of t-tau (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.27, 1.68), NfL (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.76, 2.58), and GFAP (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.90) were separately associated with increased risk of overall mortality, with higher risk in African Americans in t-tau or NfL. In models with all biomarkers, NfL (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.65, 2.85) was associated with risk of overall mortality, with racial differences in t-tau. Higher concentrations of t-tau (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.70), NfL (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.72), and GFAP (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.98) were separately associated with risk of cardiovascular mortality, with racial differences in t-tau, NfL, or GFAP. In combined models, NfL (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.78) was associated with cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum t-tau, NfL, and GFAP may be early indicators for mortality outcomes among older adults, with racial differences among associations.

Precision-based approaches to delirium in critical illness: A narrative review

Delirium occurs in critical illness and is associated with poor clinical outcomes, having a longstanding impact on survivors. Understanding the complexity of delirium in critical illness and its deleterious outcome has expanded since early reports. Delirium is a culmination of predisposing and precipitating risk factors that result in a transition to delirium. Known risks range from advanced age, frailty, medication exposure or withdrawal, sedation depth, and sepsis. Because of its multifactorial nature, different clinical phenotypes, and potential neurobiological causes, a precise approach to reducing delirium in critical illness requires a broad understanding of its complexity. Refinement in the categorization of delirium subtypes or phenotypes (i.e., psychomotor classifications) requires attention. Recent advances in the association of clinical phenotypes with clinical outcomes expand our understanding and highlight potentially modifiable targets. Several delirium biomarkers in critical care have been examined, with disrupted functional connectivity being precise in detecting delirium. Recent advances reinforce delirium as an acute, and partially modifiable, brain dysfunction, and place emphasis on the importance of mechanistic pathways including cholinergic activity and glucose metabolism. Pharmacologic agents have been assessed in randomized controlled prevention and treatment trials, with a disappointing lack of efficacy. Antipsychotics remain widely used after "negative" trials, yet may have a role in specific subtypes. However, antipsychotics do not appear to improve clinical outcomes. Alpha-2 agonists perhaps hold greater potential for current use and future investigation. The role of thiamine appears promising, yet requires evidence. Looking forward, clinical pharmacists should prioritize the mitigation of predisposing and precipitating risk factors as able. Future research is needed within individual delirium psychomotor subtypes and clinical phenotypes to identify modifiable targets that hold the potential to improve not only delirium duration and severity, but long-term outcomes including cognitive impairment.

Delirium, neurofilament light chain, and progressive cognitive impairment: analysis of a prospective Norwegian population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Previous population-based, longitudinal studies have shown that delirium is associated with an increased risk of dementia and cognitive decline. However, the underlying biological mechanisms are largely unknown. We aimed to assess the effects of delirium on both cognitive trajectories and any neuronal injury, measured via neurofilament light chain (NfL).

METHODS

In this analysis of a prospective, 2-year follow-up, cohort study of participants aged 65 years or older living in Sandefjord municipality, Norway, we included cohort participants who were receiving domiciliary care services at least once per week between May 12, 2015, and July 8, 2016. Individuals with a life expectancy of less than 1 week, with Lewy body dementia, with psychiatric illness (except dementia), or for whom substance misuse was the principal indication for domiciliary services were excluded. Participants had a comprehensive assessment at 6-month intervals for 2 years, which included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a blood sample for NfL to measure neuronal injury. All information on clinical diagnoses and medications were cross-referenced with medical records. During any acute change in mental status or hospitalisation (ie, admission to hospital), participants were assessed once per day for delirium with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition criteria. We also measured NfL from blood samples taken from participants who were acutely hospitalised.

FINDINGS

Between May 12, 2015, and July 8, 2016, 210 participants were eligible for inclusion and assessed at baseline (138 [66%] of whom were female and 72 [34%] of whom were male), 203 completed cognitive assessment, and 141 were followed up for 2 years. 160 (76%) of 210 had moderate or severe frailty and 112 (53%) were living with dementia. During the 2-year follow-up, 89 (42%) of 210 participants were diagnosed with one or more episodes of delirium. Incident delirium was independently associated with a decrease in MoCA score at the next 6-month follow-up, even after adjustment for age, sex, education, previous MoCA score, and frailty (adjusted mean difference -1·5, 95% CI -2·9 to -0·1). We found an interaction between previous MoCA score and delirium (β -0·254, 95% CI -0·441 to -0·066, p=0·010), with the largest decline being observed in people with better baseline cognition. Participants with delirium and good previous cognitive function and participants with a high peak concentration of NfL during any hospitalisation had increased NfL at the next 6-month follow-up. Mediation analyses showed independent pathways from previous MoCA score to follow-up MoCA score with contributions from incident delirium (-1·7, 95% CI -2·8 to -0·6) and from previous NfL to follow-up MoCA score with contributions from acute NfL concentrations (-1·8, -2·5 to -1·1). Delirium was directly linked with a predicted value of 1·2 pg/mL (95% CI 1·02 to 1·40, p=0·029) increase in NfL.

INTERPRETATION

In people aged 65 years or older, an episode of delirium was associated with a decline in MoCA score. Greater neuronal injury during acute illness and delirium, measured by NfL, was associated with greater cognitive decline. For clinicians, our finding of delirium associated with both signs of acute neuronal injury, measured via NfL, and cognitive decline is important regarding the risk of long-term cognitive deterioration and to acknowledge that delirium is harmful for the brain.

FUNDING

South-Eastern Norway Health Authorities, Old Age Psychiatry Research Network, Telemark Hospital Trust, Vestfold Hospital Trust, and Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health.

TRANSLATION

For the Norwegian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Neurofilament light chains to assess sepsis-associated encephalopathy: Are we on the track toward clinical implementation?

Sepsis is the most common cause of admission to intensive care units worldwide. Sepsis patients frequently suffer from sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) reflecting acute brain dysfunction. SAE may result in increased mortality, extended length of hospital stay, and long-term cognitive dysfunction. The diagnosis of SAE is based on clinical assessments, but a valid biomarker to identify and confirm SAE and to assess SAE severity is missing. Several blood-based biomarkers indicating neuronal injury have been evaluated in sepsis and their potential role as early diagnosis and prognostic markers has been studied. Among those, the neuroaxonal injury marker neurofilament light chain (NfL) was identified to potentially serve as a prognostic biomarker for SAE and to predict long-term cognitive impairment. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of biomarkers, especially NfL, in SAE and discuss a possible future clinical application considering existing limitations.

Biomarkers of delirium risk in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with increased morbidity and mortality in older patients. The aim of this study was to review predictive biomarkers of delirium in older patients to gain insights into the pathophysiology of this syndrome and provide guidance for future studies. Two authors independently and systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus databases up to August 2021. A total of 32 studies were included. Only 6 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis, pooled results showed a significant increase in some serum biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α] and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) among patients with delirium (odds ratio = 1.88, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.637; I2 = 76.75%). Although current evidence does not favour the use of any particular biomarker, serum CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 were the most consistent biomarkers of delirium in older patients.

Prospective analysis of plasma amyloid beta and postoperative delirium in the Interventions for Postoperative Delirium: Biomarker-3 study

BACKGROUND

The effect of postoperative delirium on the amyloid cascade of Alzheimer's dementia is poorly understood. Using early postoperative plasma biomarkers, we explored whether surgery and delirium are associated with changes in amyloid pathways.

METHODS

We analysed data from 100 participants in the Interventions for Postoperative Delirium: Biomarker-3 (IPOD-B3) cohort study in the USA (NCT03124303 and NCT01980511), which recruited participants aged >65 yr undergoing non-intracranial surgery. We assessed the relationship between the change in plasma amyloid beta ratio (AβR; Aβ42:Aβ40) and delirium incidence (defined by the 3-Minute Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method) and severity (quantified by the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98, the study's primary outcome). We also tested the relationship between plasma amyloid beta and intraoperative variables.

RESULTS

Across all participants, the plasma AβR increased from the preoperative period to postoperative Day 1 (Wilcoxon P<0.001). However, this increase was not associated with delirium incidence (Wilcoxon P=0.22) or peak severity after adjusting for confounders (log[incidence rate ratio]=0.43; P=0.14). Postoperative Day 1 change in plasma AβR was not associated with postoperative Day 1 change in plasma tau, neurofilament light, or inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12), or with operative time or low intraoperative arterial pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative changes in plasma amyloid do not appear to be associated with postoperative delirium. Our findings do not support associations of dynamic changes in amyloid with postoperative delirium.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

.NCT03124303 and NCT01980511.

Brain neuronal and glial damage during acute COVID-19 infection in absence of clinical neurological manifestations

BACKGROUND

To assess whether SARS-CoV-2 infection may affect the central nervous system, specifically neurons and glia cells, even without clinical neurological involvement.

METHODS

In this single centre prospective study, serum levels of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillar acidic protein (sGFAp) were assessed using SimoaTM assay Neurology 2-Plex B Assay Kit, in 148 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 without clinical neurological manifestations and compared them to 53 patients with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and 108 healthy controls (HCs).

RESULTS

Age and sex-corrected sNfL levels were higher in patients with COVID-19 (median log10-sNfL 1.41; IQR 1.04-1.83) than patients with IPF (median log10-sNfL 1.18; IQR 0.98-1.38; p<0.001) and HCs (median log10-sNfL 0.89; IQR 0.72-1.14; p<0.001). Likewise, age and sex-corrected sGFAP levels were higher in patients with COVID-19 (median log10-sGFAP 2.26; IQR 2.02-2.53) in comparison with patients with IPF (median log10-sGFAP 2.15; IQR 1.94-2.30; p<0.001) and HCs (median log10-sGFAP 1.87; IQR 0.64-2.09; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between patients with HCs and IPF (p=0.388 for sNfL and p=0.251 for sGFAp). In patients with COVID-19, a prognostic model with mortality as dependent variable (26/148 patients died during hospitalisation) and sNfl, sGFAp and age as independent variables, showed an area under curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.84; negative predictive value (NPV) (%):80,positive predictive value (PPV)(%): 84; p=0.0008).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that neuronal and glial degeneration can occur in patients with COVID-19 regardless of overt clinical neurological manifestations. With age, levels of sNfl and GFAp can predict in-hospital COVID-19-associated mortality and might be useful to assess COVID-19 patient prognostic profile.

Neurofilaments contribution in clinic: state of the art

Neurological biomarkers are particularly valuable to clinicians as they can be used for diagnosis, prognosis, or response to treatment. This field of neurology has evolved considerably in recent years with the improvement of analytical methods, allowing the detection of biomarkers not only in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but also in less invasive fluids like blood. These advances greatly facilitate the repeated quantification of biomarkers, including at asymptomatic stages of the disease. Among the various informative biomarkers of neurological disorders, neurofilaments (NfL) have proven to be of particular interest in many contexts, such as neurodegenerative diseases, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and cancer. Here we discuss these different pathologies and the potential value of NfL assay in the management of these patients, both for diagnosis and prognosis. We also describe the added value of NfL compared to other biomarkers currently used to monitor the diseases described in this review.