Distribution and prognostic value of histopathologic data and immunohistochemical markers in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): An analysis of the EORTC phase III trial of treatment of metastatic GISTs with imatinib mesylate

First Description of the Clinical Activity of Avapritinib in Sporadic Mesenteric Desmoid Tumor

Desmoid tumors (DTs) are rare and locally aggressive with a high rate of local recurrence even with optimal surgical resection. Systemic treatments are often utilized for desmoid cases with high risk of surgical morbidity or for local and symptomatic control of recurrent disease. However, the systemic treatment options for DTs are limited with limited responses. Avapritinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in 2020 for adults with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) harboring a platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) Exon 18 mutation, including D842V mutations. In this case report, we describe a 55-year-old man with a history of D842V-mutant gastric GIST who presented several years after complete resection of the GIST with an enlarging soft tissue mass in the small intestine. After a nondiagnostic biopsy, the patient was started on avapritinib due to concerns for recurrent D842V-mutant GIST. The tumor had a partial response to treatment by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the patient underwent surgical resection. The final pathology report revealed a sporadic DT. To our knowledge, this is the first known description of the activity of avapritinib in the treatment of a sporadic mesenteric DT, which is relevant given the limited treatment options for patients with this diagnosis. This clinical finding may be worth exploring in a dedicated clinical trial.

Surgical Approaches and Oncological Outcomes in the Management of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)

BACKGROUND

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are a rare subset of GIST. Their surgical management in this anatomically complex region consists of varied approaches, and the administration of imatinib mesylate (IM) has not been clarified.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with duodenal GIST treated during a 10-year-period. We analysed the clinicopathological characteristics and survival factors and evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes based on the extent of resection ((ocal-resection (LR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)) and the IM-administration. The median follow-up period was 60 months (range, 12-140).

RESULTS

A total of thirteen patients (M:F = 7:6) with median age of 64 years (range, 42-77) underwent resection of duodenal GIST. Median tumor size was 5.2 cm (range, 1.5-13.3). Eight patients (61.5%) underwent LR and five patients (38.5%) PD. R0-resection was achieved in 92.5%. Neoadjuvant IM-therapy was administered in five patients leading to tumor downsizing and in 40% to less-extended resection. The PD group consisted of larger tumors with higher mitotic count, mostly located in D2 (p = 0.031). The PD group had longer operative time (p = 0.026), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016), and higher rate of postoperative complications (p = 0.128). The actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 92.5%, 84%, and 73.5%, respectively, whereas the disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.5%, 83%, and 72%, respectively. A tendency towards increased risk of disease recurrence was demonstrated for patients with tumor >5 cm and high-risk potential. There was not statistic survival benefit for one or the other surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

The type of resection depends on duodenal site of origin and tumor size. LR can be the treatment of choice for duodenal GIST whenever technically feasible. Recurrence of duodenal GIST is dependent on tumor biology rather than surgical approach. Administration of IM in neaodjuvant setting should be considered in cases with high-risk GIST scheduled for PD since it might facilitate less-extended resection.

Genetic Characterization of Molecular Targets in Korean Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Purpose

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) frequently harbor activating gene mutations in either KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) and are highly responsive to several selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this study, a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay with an Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA) panel was used for the genetic characterization of molecular targets in 30 Korean patients with GIST.

Materials and Methods

Using the OFA that enables rapid and simultaneous detection of hotspots, single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertion and deletions (Indels), copy number variants (CNVs), and gene fusions across 52 genes relevant to solid tumors, targeted NGS was performed using genomic DNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of 30 GISTs.

Results

Forty-three hotspot/other likely pathogenic variants (33 SNVs, 8 Indels, and 2 amplifications) in 16 genes were identified in 26 of the 30 GISTs. KIT variants were most frequent (44%, 19/43), followed by 6 variants in PIK3CA, 3 in PDGFRA, 2 each in JAK1 and EGFR, and 1 each in AKT1, ALK, CCND1, CTNNB1, FGFR3, FGFR4, GNA11, GNAQ, JAK3, MET, and SMO. Based on the mutation types, majority of the variants carried missense mutations (60%, 26/43), followed by 8 frameshifts, 6 nonsense, 1 stop-loss, and 2 amplifications.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed the advantage of using targeted NGS with a cancer gene panel to efficiently identify mutations associated with GISTs. These findings may provide a molecular genetic basis for developing new drugs targeting these gene mutations for GIST therapy.

Perspectives on the evolving state of the art management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) represent a very exciting tumour entity for the medical oncologist. There has been extensive clinical and preclinical research dissecting the natural behaviour, molecular landscape and therapeutic responsiveness of this rare mesenchymal tumour. Various molecular subtypes of GIST have a differing prognostic and predictive relevance in the state of the art management of the disease. Emerging mature clinical trial data gathered over the last one and half decade provided substantial molecular profiling information in understanding the success and eventual failure of treatment. In our review of the most relevant literature we aim to guide the clinician in tailoring neoadjuvant, adjuvant and palliative treatment of GIST alongside the different, now well established molecular subgroups of GISTs.

The incidence, mutational status, risk classification and referral pattern of gastro-intestinal stromal tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide pathology registry (PALGA) study

Symptomatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are infrequent with an incidence of 12.7 per million inhabitants in the western population. We studied whether the incidence of GIST has further increased between 2003 and 2012 and assessed the frequency of mutations, risk groups, histological subtypes and immunohistochemistry results. From PALGA, the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry, pathology excerpts from all patients with a GIST or GIST-like tumour between 2003 and 2012 were retrieved to calculate incidence rates. Full pathology reports were retrieved of resections in 2011 and 2012 to study the frequency of mutations, risk groups, histological subtypes and immunohistochemistry results. The incidence of GIST increased to 17.7 per million inhabitants in 2012 with a median age of 67 years. Mutational analysis was performed in 33.9% of patients with a resection between 2011 and 2012 (KIT mutation 67.5%, PDGFRA 16.3%, wild-type 11.4%). The percentage of high risk patients in the different risk classifications varied from 19.9% to 38.0% depending on the used classification. Only 35.9% of patients had diagnosis or revision of pathology diagnosis within three months in a designated GIST referral centre. No increase in proportion of central pathology reviews was found. Proportion of patients with mutational analysis increased over the years. The registered incidence of GIST, 17.7 per million inhabitants in 2012 in the Netherlands, is still rising. Despite incorporation in the ESMO GIST guidelines since 2008 for mutational testing and since 2010 for central review of pathology, both are performed in a minority of patients.

Somatic mutational spectrum analysis in a prospective series of 104 gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors distinguished by driver mutations in proto-oncogenes KIT or PDGFRA in 85-90% of cases. These mutations have been linked to the response to imatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, and have independent prognostic impact. Here, we describe the prospective study of the molecular characteristics of 104 GISTs from French adult patients analyzed routinely through the National Hospital Program of Molecular Cancer Diagnosis. All patients with GISTs diagnosed at the University Hospital of Besançon between August 2005 and October 2014 were prospectively included in the present study. KIT, PDGFRA and KRAS-codons 12 and 13 as well as BRAF codon 600 mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing or SNaPshot. KIT and PDGFRA mutations were detected in 71.2 and 19.2% of the cases, respectively. A total of 43 different mutations were detected of which 13 had never been described. As expected, KIT exon 9 and PDGFRA exon 18 mutations were associated with small bowel and gastric localizations respectively. No mutation was found in KRAS and BRAF. Molecular studies are critical to improve the management of GISTs. Our study enhances the current knowledge by describing 13 new mutations in KIT. A common molecular pattern in all KIT exon 11 substitutions is also described for the first time in this study but its significance remains unknown since genetic and environmental risk factors favoring the development of GISTs such as DNA repair defects and exposure to carcinogens are not currently known.

Molecular subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and their prognostic and therapeutic implications

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are composed of various molecular subtypes, with differing prognostic and predictive relevance. Previously, tumors lacking mutations in the KIT and PDGFRA genes have been designated as 'wild-type' GISTs; however, they represent a heterogeneous group currently undergoing further subclassification. Primary and secondary resistance to imatinib poses a significant clinical challenge, therefore ongoing research is trying to evaluate mechanisms to overcome resistance. Thorough understanding of the prognostic and predictive relevance of different genetic subtypes of GIST can guide clinical decision-making both in the adjuvant and the metastatic setting. Further work is required to identify tailored therapies for specific subgroups of GISTs wild-type for KIT and PDGFRA mutations and to identify predictive factors of resistance to currently approved systemic therapies.

Aggressive Surgical Resection Combined With Imatinib Therapy for Liver Metastases From a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

The use of imatinib mesylate has influenced survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, whether a combination of imatinib and surgical resection can further prolong survival in these patients has not yet been fully elucidated. We report a case of a 59-year-old woman with multiple liver metastases from a jejunal GIST. The patient received imatinib therapy after partial resection of the jejunum, and she subsequently underwent right hepatic trisectionectomy. However, liver metastasis was detected again after surgery. Secondary imatinib therapy was started, and the patient underwent partial hepatectomy at the left lateral segment. Postoperatively, the patient underwent imatinib treatment and has survived without recurrence for 3 years. Imatinib is recommended for the treatment of advanced GIST; however, a complete response is rare, and approximately half of all patients develop resistance to imatinib. Aggressive surgical resection combined with imatinib may be effective for the control of advanced GIST.

Assessment of early response to imatinib 800 mg after 400 mg progression by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

ABSTRACT 

Introduction: Imatinib is the standard first-line therapy for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) shows a faster response than computed tomography in nonpretreated patients. Patients & methods: After disease progression on imatinib 400 mg, 16 patients were exposed to 800 mg. Tumor response was evaluated by FDG PET/CT on days 7 and 37. Primary objective was to correlate early metabolic response (EMR) with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: EMR by FDG PET/CT scan was not predictive of PFS. Median PFS in these patients was 3 months. Overall survival was influenced by gastric primary site (p = 0.05). Conclusion: The assessment of EMR by FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor exposed to imatinib 800 mg was not predictive of PFS or overall survival.

Conservative surgery vs. duodeneopancreatectomy in primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a retrospective review of 114 patients from the French sarcoma group (FSG)

BACKGROUND

Duodenal GISTs represent 3-5% of all GISTs with limited understanding of patient outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of primary localized duodenal GISTs.

METHODS

Patients were identified via a survey from 16 FSG centers (n = 105), and a group of 9 patients enrolled in the BFR14 trial. Data were collected from the original database and patient files, in agreement with French legislation.

RESULTS

114 patients were included, with a median age of 57. Tumors originated mainly in D2 (33%), or D3 (24%), with a median size of 5 cm. 109 patients had resection of the primary tumor; with a Local Resection (LR, n = 82), a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, n = 23), and data were missing for 4 patients. Resections were R0 (n = 87, 79%), R1 (n = 8, 7%), R2 (n = 6). Tumor characteristics were: KIT+ (n = 104), CD34+ (n = 58). Miettinen risk was low (n = 43), and high (n = 52). Imatinib was administered preoperatively (n = 11) and post-operatively (n = 20). With a median follow-up of 36 months (2-250), 98 patients are alive, and 33 relapsed. The 5-year OS and EFS rates are 86.5% and 54.5%. EFS was similar for patients in the LR and the PD groups (P > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, and CD34 expression are independent prognostic factors on OS. Miettinen risk and spindle cell type are independent predictive factors for relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with resected duodenal GIST have a reasonably favorable prognosis. This study favors a preservation of pancreas when there are no anatomical constraints. LR exhibit similar survival and smaller morbidity then PD.

Does immunohistochemistry provide additional prognostic data in gastrointestinal stromal tumors?

BACKGROUND

To investigate the predictive and prognostic effects of clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients who were diagnosed with GIST between 2002 and 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Relationships between clinicopathologic/immunohistochemical factors and prognosis were investigated.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) of the whole study group was 74.9 months (42.8-107.1 months), while it was 95.2 months in resectable and 44.7 months in metastatic patients respectively (p=0.007). Epitheliolid tumor morphology was significantly associated with shortened OS as compared to other histologies (p=0.001). SMA(+) tumours were significantly correlated with low (<10/50HPF) mitotic activity (p=0.034). Moreover, SMA(+) patients tended to survive longer and had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) times than SMA (-) patients (37.7 months vs 15.9 months; p=0.002). High Ki-67 level (≥30%) was significantly associated with shorter OS (34 vs 95.2 months; 95%CI; p=0.001). CD34 (-) tumours were significantly associated with low proliferative tumours (Ki-67<%10) (p=0.026). Median PFS (progression-free survival) of the patients who received imatinib was 36 months (27.7-44.2 months). CD34 (-) patients had significantly longer PFS times than that of negative tumours; (50.8 vs 29.8 months; p=0.045). S100 and desmin expression did not play any role in predicting the prognosis of GISTs. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ≥10/50HPF mitotic activity/HPF was the only independent factor for risk of death in GIST patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the negative prognostic and predictive effect of high Ki-67 and CD34 expression, mitotic activity remains the strongest prognostic factor in GIST patients. SMA positivity seems to affect GIST prognosis positively. However, large-scale, multicenter studies are required to provide supportive data for these findings.

Extended adjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors : recommendations for patient selection, risk assessment, and molecular response monitoring

On the basis of the recently published results of a clinical trial comparing 12 and 36 months of imatinib in adjuvant therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), which demonstrated clinical benefit of longer imatinib treatment in terms of delaying recurrences and improving overall survival, both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have updated their recommendations and approved 36 months of imatinib treatment in patients with v-kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KIT)-positive GISTs (also known as CD117-positive GISTs) at high risk of recurrence after surgical resection of a primary tumor. This article discusses patient selection criteria for extended adjuvant therapy with imatinib, different classifications of risk of recurrence, and assessment of the response to therapy.

Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver: report of a case

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. They can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, and rarely outside the digestive tract. We herein report a case of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor that was resected from the liver of a 56-year-old male, which is the sixth description of a primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The tumor was shown to be completely limited within the liver by radiological, intraoperative and pathological examinations. The pathological results demonstrated an intermediate risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and immunohistochemical expression of CD117 was positive. Although rare, we suggested that GISTs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules, and that not all hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors should automatically be considered to be metastases from a primary gastrointestinal site.

Evaluation of prognostic factors and their capacity to predict biological behavior in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are c-KIT-signaling-driven mesenchymal tumors of the human digestive tract, many of which have c-KIT or PDGFRα activating mutations. The authors studied the immunohistochemical markers, c-KIT and PDGFRα mutations, in GISTs and their association with the clinicopathological and clinical follow-up in 145 GISTs. Tumors were located mainly in the stomach, the median tumor size being 7.5 cm. The mitotic index was ≤5 mitoses per 50 high-power fields in 61% of cases, 96% expressed CD117, and c-KIT or PDGFRα mutations were detected in 68% of cases. The median follow-up of the series was 52 months (range = 1 to 244.9 months). Tumor size, cell morphology, mitotic index, incomplete resection, Fletcher's risk classification, Ki-67 overexpression, and c-KIT mutations were associated with progression-free survival. Incomplete resection and mitotic activity also provide information about overall survival. In conclusion, complete clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and genetic descriptions are necessary to characterize this disease and optimize its clinical management.

Molecular basis for primary and secondary tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Small molecule kinase inhibitors have irrevocably altered cancer treatment. March 2010 marks the 10th anniversary of using imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), a cardinal example of the utility of such targeted therapy in a solid tumor. Before imatinib, metastatic GIST was frustrating to treat due to its resistance to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Median survival for patients with metastatic GIST improved from 19 to 60 months with imatinib. In treating patients with GIST, two patterns of tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance have been observed. In the first, ~9-14% of patients have progression within 3 months of starting imatinib. These patients are classified as having primary or early resistance. Median progression-free survival (PFS) on imatinib is approximately 24 months; patients with later progression are classified as having secondary or acquired resistance. Primary studies and a meta-analysis of studies of imatinib in GIST patients have identified prognostic features that contribute to treatment failure. One of the strongest predictors for success of therapy is KIT or PDGFRA mutational status. Patients with KIT exon 11 mutant GIST have better response rates, PFS, and overall survival compared to other mutations. A great deal has been learned in the last decade about sensitivity and resistance of GIST to imatinib; however, many unanswered questions remain about secondary resistance mechanisms and clinical management in the third- and fourth-line setting. This review will discuss the role of dose effects, and early and late resistance to imatinib and their clinical implications. Patients intolerant to imatinib (5%) and those who progress on imatinib are treated with sunitinib. The mechanism of resistance to sunitinib is unknown at this time but is also appears related to growth of clones with secondary mutations in KIT. Third- and fourth-line treatments of GIST and with future treatment strategies are also discussed.

DOG1 and CD117 are the antibodies of choice in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

AIMS

The histopathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is typically made based on a combination of clinical and morphological features supported by immunohistochemistry studies. The aim of this study was to examine the staining quality, sensitivity, specificity and utility of antibodies used commonly in GIST diagnosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry with a panel of antibodies [CD117, DOG1, protein kinase C (PKC)-theta, nestin, CD34, smooth muscle actin (SMA), desmin, S100 and CD171] was performed on whole sections from 187 GIST and 29 gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumours, and on several microarrays including 355 GISTs and 120 soft tissue sarcomas. Results showed that DOG1 and CD117 were the most sensitive and specific antibodies used in GIST diagnosis. PKC-theta and nestin were sensitive, but less specific, also staining other spindle cell tumours commonly considered in the differential diagnosis of GIST. CD34 staining was less sensitive than many of the other antibodies and of limited aid in diagnosis. The smooth muscle markers SMA and desmin, together with the neural marker S100, were unhelpful in confirming a diagnosis of GIST, but were particularly useful in the exclusion/diagnosis of other gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumour types.

CONCLUSIONS

In the majority of histologically suspected GISTs a combination of CD117 and DOG1 immunostaining is sufficient to confirm the histological diagnosis.

Implications of mutational analysis for the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the application of targeted therapies

The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and sunitinib, have significantly improved the prognosis for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Most GISTs exhibit mutations in the genes encoding the stem cell factor receptor (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Imatinib is more effective in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations compared with KIT exon 9 mutations and wild-type genotype, while sunitinib confers greater in vitro efficacy in patients with KIT exon 9 mutants and wild-type genotype than in KIT exon 11 mutants. This review examines the potential role of mutational analysis to optimize therapy with imatinib and sunitinib for GIST.

Imatinib mesylate in patients with WHO B3 thymomas and thymic carcinomas

Thymic malignancies are rare tumors of the mediastinum. c-KIT is highly expressed in thymic carcinomas (TC) but infrequently in thymomas. Anecdotal experience suggests activity of imatinib mesylate in TC. Patients with unresectable World Health Organization B3 thymomas or TC, performance status 0 to 2, good organ function, and measurable disease were enrolled in this study. Imatinib was administered at 600 mg PO daily. Seven patients were recruited at one institution: two World Health Organization B3 thymomas and five TC. Imatinib treatment was generally well tolerated. Two patients had stable disease and five progressed. Median survival was 4 months, and median time to progression was 2 months. c-KIT expression was found in one of four samples by immunohistochemistry. No mutations were detected in the c-KIT or PDGFRA genes in three samples analyzed. Imatinib has no major activity in this rare tumor. Given the small number of patients treated in this study, selection based on presence of c-KIT mutations might be warranted.

Targeted therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current status and future perspectives

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) present 80% of gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumors, with systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy being unable to improve survival of patients with advanced disease. The identification of activating mutations in either KIT cell surface growth factor receptor or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha, which lead to ligand-independent signal transduction, paved the way for the development of novel agents that selectively inhibit key molecular events in disease pathogenesis. The development of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic GIST represents a therapeutic breakthrough in molecularly targeted strategies, which crucially improved patients' prognosis while its usefulness in adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting is under study. Sunitinib malate is available in the second-line setting, with ongoing studies evaluating its role in an earlier disease stage, while other targets are under intense investigation in order to enrich the therapeutical armamentarium for this disease. GIST phenotype seems to be an essential indicator of treatment response; thus, obtaining genotype information of each patient may be critical in order to tailor individualized treatment strategies and achieve maximal therapeutic results.

Molecular pathology of sarcomas: concepts and clinical implications

The molecular genetic changes that have been described in sarcomas over the past era have aided our understanding of their pathogenesis. The majority of sarcomas carry nonspecific genetic changes within a background of a complex karyotype. These constitute the challenges in sarcoma research for unraveling a putative multistep genetic model, such as for chondrosarcoma, and finding targets for therapeutic strategies. Approximately 15-20% of mesenchymal tumors carry a specific translocation within a relatively simple karyotype. The resulting fusion products act either as transcription factors upregulating genes responsible for tumor growth, as for instance in Ewing sarcoma, or translocate a highly active promoter in front of an oncogene driving tumor formation, as for instance in aneurysmal bone cyst. In addition, a small subset of mesenchymal tumors have specific somatic mutations driving oncogenesis. The specific genetic changes unraveled so far had great impact on the classification of bone and soft tissue tumors. In addition, these changes can assist the pathologist in the differential diagnosis of some of these entities, especially within the groups of small blue round cell tumors and spindle cell tumors, if performed in specialized centers. While a putative association between certain fusion products and outcome is still under debate, the role of predicting response of targeted therapy has been well established for KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors I: pathology, pathobiology, primary therapy, and surgical issues

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs) are the most common connective tissue malignancies of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, with an incidence on the order of 10-13 per million people per year. Primary therapy is usually surgical, but the recurrence rate of large, so-called high-risk tumors, with a high mitotic rate, or those arising from small bowel and colon/rectum is particularly high. The natural history, pathology, and molecular biology of GISTs are discussed in this review, as are features of increasing our analytical power of the genes altered in these tumors, surgical issues, and the translation of research findings into clinical practice. The biological features of GIST make it a model for the examination of kinase-targeted therapeutics in solid tumors.

Cell cycle/apoptosis molecule expression correlates with imatinib response in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE

Altered expression of cell cycle/apoptosis key regulators may promote tumor progression, reflect secondary genetic/epigenetic events, and impair the effectiveness of therapy. Their expression pattern might then identify gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patient subgroups with different response to imatinib and elucidate novel therapeutic targets.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Immunohistochemical evaluation of expression of p53, p16, p21, CHK2, CCND1, BCL2, CDK4, and MDM2 was done on 353 histologically validated GIST patients enrolled into a European/Australasian phase III trial. TP53 was screened for mutations in cases with presumptive nonfunctional protein; that is, high p53 and low expression of the two downstream molecules p21 and MDM2. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic data, KIT/PDGFRA mutation status, and imatinib dosage.

RESULTS

Frequent impaired expression was found for BCL2 (78%), CHK2 (53%), p53 (50%), and p16 (47%). Stomach-originating GISTs showed significantly lower expression of p21, p16, and BCL2. KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs had significant lower expression of CDK4. Eighty-eight percent of the high p53 expressers show low downstream target activation, indicating a nonfunctional p53 route. Of these high p53 expressers, 16.4% harbor a detectable TP53 mutation. Multivariate analysis, including previously identified markers, showed an independent effect of p53 and p16 on progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with high level of CHK2 and p21 showed significantly better PFS upon a high-dose regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired p53, p16, BCL2, and CHK2 expression is common in advanced GISTs. Distinct patterns of expression correlate with tumor site, genotype, and PFS. Cell cycle/apoptosis maintenance is instrumental for optimal response to imatinib.

Gene expression profiling for the investigation of soft tissue sarcoma pathogenesis and the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers

Soft tissue sarcomas are malignant neoplasms derived from mesenchymal tissues. Their pathogenesis is poorly understood and there are few effective treatment options for advanced disease. In the past decade, gene expression profiling has been applied to sarcomas to facilitate understanding of sarcoma pathogenesis and to identify diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. In this paper, we review this body of work and discuss how gene expression profiling has led to advancements in the understanding of sarcoma pathobiology, the identification of clinically useful biomarkers, and the refinement of sarcoma classification schemes. Lastly, we conclude with a discussion of strategies to further optimize the translation of gene expression data into a greater understanding of sarcoma pathogenesis and improved clinical outcomes for sarcoma patients.

Diagnosis and multi-disciplinary management of hepatic metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)

AIM

To explore the present application of diagnosis and management of hepatic metastases from GIST.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature for studies concerning hepatic metastases from GIST. A literature search was performed using the Medline/PubMed databases to identify publications relevant to the review published from January 1998 to December 2008. Totally 113 relevant articles were retrieved. Abstracts from recent ASCO symposia were hand searched for relevant articles. After the primary filtration, articles on review and with repetitive content were excluded. The articles on clinical research, which were issued in authorized journals, were selected. At last, totally 69 articles were included for review.

FINDINGS

The rate of liver metastases was reported as 15.9% in primary GISTs. The recurrence rate following surgical resection for hepatic metastases from GIST had been reported as 70-77%. For metastatic GIST patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, it demonstrated rates of CR, PR and SD respectively of 5.84%, 50.7%, and 32.4%. Combining repeated surgery with TKI treatment, R0/R1 resection rates range in various series between 48 and 82%. For those patients with unresectable disease confined to the liver or unable to tolerate liver resection due to co-morbidity or advanced age, RFA, HACE, TKI therapy, or even liver transplantation, can also improve survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver is a common metastatic site for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). Appropriate initial evaluation remains paramount for selecting the correct management strategy. Multi-disciplinary management (which includes pathology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, and imaging expertise) of this disease is important for both curative and palliative treatment in these patients. Combining repeated surgery with TKI treatment may be the most effective management for GIST patients with liver metastases.