Tenosynovial giant cell tumour/pigmented villonodular synovitis: outcome of 294 patients before the era of kinase inhibitors

Treatment Modalities for Refractory-Recurrent Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT): An Update

Background and Objectives: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, benign neoplasm arising from the synovium of joints, tendon sheaths, and bursa. There are two main subtypes of TGCT: localized-type TGCT(L-TGCT) and diffuse-type TGCT (D-TGCT). While surgical excision is still considered the gold standard of treatment, the high recurrence rate, especially for D-TGCT, may suggest the need for other treatment modalities. Materials and Methods: This study reviews current literature on the current treatment modalities for refractory-relapsed TGCT disease. Results: The gold standard of treatment modality in TGCT remains surgical excision of the tumor nevertheless, the elevated recurrence rate and refractory disease, particularly in D-TGCT indicates and underscores the necessity for additional treatment alternatives. Conclusions: TGCT is a benign tumor with inflammatory features and a potential destructive and aggressive course that can lead to significant morbidity and functional impairment with a high impact on quality of life. Surgical resection remains the gold standard current treatment and the optimal surgical approach depends on the location and extent of the tumor. Systemic therapies have been recently used for relapsed mainly cases.

Pathology of intra-articular tumours and tumour-like lesions: pearls, pitfalls and rarities from a general surgical pathology practice

Intra-articular tumours are uncommonly encountered in routine practice and may present diagnostic challenges to pathologists. Challenges unique to this site include distinction from more common reactive synovial conditions, which are far more common; histologic variability; superimposed reactive changes; and often, lack of provided clinicoradiological context. This article reviews the pathology of the synovial tumours and tumour-like lesions, including diagnostic pearls, pitfalls and rare entities.

What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?

BACKGROUND

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumor (D-TGCT), formerly known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a rare, locally aggressive, invasive soft tissue tumor that primarily occurs in the knee. Surgical excision is the main treatment option, but there is a high recurrence rate. Arthroscopic surgical techniques are emphasized because they are less traumatic and offer faster postoperative recovery, but detailed reports on arthroscopic techniques and outcomes of D-TGCT in large cohorts are still lacking.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the recurrence rate of knee D-TGCT after multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy? (2) What are the complications, knee ROM, pain score, and patient-reported outcomes for patients, and do they differ between patients with and without recurrence? (3) What factors are associated with recurrence after arthroscopic treatment in patients with D-TGCT?

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective study conducted between January 2010 and April 2021, we treated 295 patients with knee D-TGCTs. We considered patients undergoing initial surgical treatment with multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy as potentially eligible. Based on that, 27% (81 of 295) of patients were excluded because of recurrence after synovectomy performed at another institution. Of the 214 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17% (36 of 214) were lost to follow-up, leaving 83% (178 of 214) of patients in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (50 of 178) of patients were men and 72% (128 of 178) were women, with a median (range) age of 36 years (7 to 69). The median follow-up duration was 80 months (26 to 149). All patients underwent multiportal (anterior and posterior approaches) arthroscopic synovectomy, and all surgical protocols were determined by discussion among four surgeons after preoperative MRI. A combined open posterior incision was used for patients with lesions that invaded or surrounded the blood vessels and nerves or invaded the muscle space extraarticularly. Standard postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was recommended for all patients with D-TGCT who had extraarticular and posterior compartment invasion; for patients with only anterior compartment invasion, radiotherapy was recommended for severe cases as assessed by the surgeons and radiologists based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative descriptions. Postoperative recurrence at 5 years was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator. The WOMAC score (0 to 96, with higher scores representing a worse outcome; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 8.5), the Lysholm knee score (0 to 100, with higher scores being better knee function; MCID 25.4), the VAS for pain (0 to 10, with higher scores representing more pain; MCID 2.46), and knee ROM were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Because we did not have preoperative patient-reported outcomes scores, we present data on the proportion of patients who achieved the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each of those outcome metrics, which were 14.6 of 96 points on the WOMAC, 52.5 of 100 points on the Lysholm, and 2.32 of 10 points on the VAS.

RESULTS

The symptomatic or radiographically documented recurrence at 5 years was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7% to 17%) using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with a mean recurrence time of 33 ± 19 months. Of these, three were asymptomatic recurrences found during regular MRI reviews, and the remaining 19 underwent repeat surgery. There was one intraoperative complication (vascular injury) with no effect on postoperative limb function and eight patients with postoperative joint stiffness, seven of whom improved with prolonged rehabilitation and one with manipulation under anesthesia. No postradiotherapy complications were found. The proportion of patients who achieved the preestablished PASS was 99% (176 of 178) for the VAS pain score, 97% (173 of 178) for the WOMAC score, and 100% (178 of 178) for the Lysholm score. A lower percentage of patients with recurrence achieved the PASS for WOMAC score than patients without recurrence (86% [19] versus 99% [154], OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.52]; p = 0.01), whereas no difference was found in the percentage of VAS score (95% [21] versus 99% [155], OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.01 to 2.25]; p = 0.23) or Lysholm score (100% [22] versus 100% [156], OR 1 [95% CI 1 to 1]; p = 0.99). Moreover, patients in the recurrence group showed worse knee flexion (median 135° [100° to 135°] versus median 135° [80° to 135°]; difference of medians 0°; p = 0.03), worse WOMAC score (median 3.5 [0 to 19] versus median 1 [0 to 29]; difference of medians 2.5; p = 0.01), and higher VAS pain score (median 1 [0 to 4] versus median 0 [0 to 4]; difference of medians 1; p < 0.01) than those in the nonrecurrence group, although no differences reached the MCID. No factors were associated with D-TGCT recurrence, including the use of postoperative radiotherapy, surgical technique, and invasion extent.

CONCLUSION

This single-center, large-cohort retrospective study confirmed that multiportal arthroscopic surgery can be used to treat knee D-TGCTs with a low recurrence rate, few complications, and satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Surgeons should conduct a thorough preoperative evaluation, meticulous arthroscopic synovectomy, and regular postoperative follow-up when treating patients with D-TGCT to reduce postoperative recurrence. Because the available evidence does not appear to fully support the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients with D-TGCTs and our study design is inadequate to resolve this controversial issue, future studies should look for more appropriate indications for radiotherapy, such as planning based on a more precise classification of lesion invasion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Vimseltinib versus placebo for tenosynovial giant cell tumour (MOTION): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm for which few systemic treatment options exist. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib, an oral, switch-control, CSF1R inhibitor, in patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgery.

METHODS

MOTION is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 35 specialised hospitals in 13 countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of TGCT for which surgical resection could potentially worsen functional limitation or cause severe morbidity. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with interactive response technology to vimseltinib (30 mg orally twice weekly) or placebo, administrated in 28-day cycles for 24 weeks. Patients and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment until week 25, unless progressive disease was confirmed earlier. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) at week 25 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05059262, and enrolment is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 21, 2022, and Feb 21, 2023, 123 patients were randomly assigned (83 to vimseltinib and 40 to placebo). 73 (59%) patients were female and 50 (41%) were male. Nine (11%) of 83 patients assigned to vimseltinib and five (13%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo discontinued treatment before week 25; one patient in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Objective response rate per RECIST was 40% (33 of 83 patients) in the vimseltinib group vs 0% (none of 40) in the placebo group (difference 40% [95% CI 29-51]; p<0·0001). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1 or 2; the only grade 3 or 4 TEAE that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving vimseltinib was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (eight [10%] of 83). One patient in the vimseltinib group had a treatment-related serious TEAE of subcutaneous abscess. No evidence of cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury was noted.

INTERPRETATION

Vimseltinib produced a significant objective response rate and clinically meaningful functional and symptomatic improvement in patients with TGCT, providing an effective treatment option for these patients.

FUNDING

Deciphera Pharmaceuticals.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Real-world drug utilization and treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USA

Aim: Real-world treatment patterns in tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) patients remain unknown. Pexidartinib is the only US FDA-approved treatment for TGCT associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Objective: To characterize drug utilization and treatment patterns in TGCT patients. Methods: In a retrospective observational study using IQVIA's linked prescription and medical claims databases (2018-2021), TGCT patients were stratified by their earliest systemic therapy claim (pexidartinib [N = 82] or non-FDA-approved systemic therapy [N = 263]). Results: TGCT patients treated with pexidartinib versus non-FDA-approved systemic therapies were predominantly female (61 vs 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years, respectively. Pexidartinib-treated patients had the highest 12-month probability of remaining on treatment (54%); 34.1% of pexidartinib users had dose reduction after their first claim. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the unmet need, utilization and treatment patterns of systemic therapies for the treatment of TGCT patients.

Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: What Are the Important Findings on the Initial and Follow-Up MRI?

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) is a rare soft tissue tumor that involves the synovial lining of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths, primarily affecting young patients (usually in the fourth decade of life). The tumor comprises two subtypes: the localized type (L-TSGCT) and the diffuse type (D-TSGCT). Although these subtypes share histological and genetic similarities, they present a different prognosis. D-TSGCT tends to exhibit local aggressiveness and a higher recurrence rate compared to L-TSGCT. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred diagnostic tool for both the initial diagnosis and for treatment planning. When interpreting the initial MRI of a suspected TSGCT, it is essential to consider: (i) the characteristic findings of TSGCT-evident as low to intermediate signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images, with a blooming artifact on gradient-echo sequences due to hemosiderin deposition; (ii) the possibility of D-TSGCT-extensive involvement of the synovial membrane with infiltrative margin; and (iii) the resectability and extent-if resectable, synovectomy is performed; if not, a novel systemic therapy involving colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitors is administered. In the interpretation of follow-up MRIs of D-TSGCTs after treatment, it is crucial to consider both tumor recurrence and potential complications such as osteoarthritis after surgery as well as the treatment response after systemic treatment. Given its prevalence in young adult patents and significant impact on patients' quality of life, clinical trials exploring new agents targeting D-TSGCT are currently underway. Consequently, understanding the characteristic MRI findings of D-TSGCT before and after treatment is imperative.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumours: experience at an Australian tertiary referral centre for musculoskeletal tumours with minimum two-year follow-up

Aims

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system. Surgical management is fraught with challenges due to high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to describe surgical treatment and evaluate surgical outcomes of TGCT at an Australian tertiary referral centre for musculoskeletal tumours and to identify factors affecting recurrence rates.

Methods

A prospective database of all patients with TGCT surgically managed by two orthopaedic oncology surgeons was reviewed. All cases irrespective of previous treatment were included and patients without follow-up were excluded. Pertinent tumour characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected for analysis.

Results

There were 111 total cases included in the study; 71 (64%) were female, the mean age was 36 years (SD 13.6), and the knee (n = 64; 57.7%) was the most commonly affected joint. In all, 60 patients (54.1%) had diffuse-type (D-TGCT) disease, and 94 patients (84.7%) presented therapy-naïve as "primary cases" (PC). The overall recurrence rate was 46.8% for TGCT. There was a statistically significant difference in recurrence rates between D-TGCT and localized disease (75.0% vs 13.7%, relative risk (RR) 3.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.17 to 5.34; p < 0.001), and for those who were referred in the "revision cases" (RC) group compared to the PC group (82.4% vs 48.9%, RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.28; p = 0.011). Age, sex, tumour volume, and mean duration of symptoms were not associated with recurrence (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Recurrence rates remain high even at a tertiary referral hospital. Highest rates are seen in D-TGCT and "revision cases". Due to the risks of recurrence, the complexity of surgery, and the need for adjuvant therapy, this paper further supports the management of TGCT in a tertiary referral multi-disciplinary orthopaedic oncology service.

Oncological and functional outcomes of modified arthroscopic resection for intra-articular tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the knee using multiple portals

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic resection of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TS-GCT) presents favorable outcomes. However, there are reportedly higher recurrence rates in patients who had incomplete resection. To minimize incomplete resection, we established a multiple portal approach depending on the location of the disease. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic resection for both localized and diffuse types of TS-GCT of the knee.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2019, 13 patients who underwent arthroscopic synovectomy of the knee and were histologically diagnosed with TS-GCT were included in this study. The pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee was measured. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were assessed at the final follow-up examination. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to detect incomplete resection or local recurrence.

RESULTS

Among the 13 patients, seven and six had localized and diffuse type TS-GCT, respectively. Regarding the knee ROM, preoperative knee flexion in patients with the localized type was limited compared with that in those with the diffuse type. However, the ROM was significantly improved in patients with both types postoperatively. The JOA score and KOOS of patients with both types at the final follow-up were favorable, and there were no significant differences between both types. There was neither recurrence nor incomplete resection in any patient for both types.

CONCLUSION

All patients, regardless of the TS-GCT type, achieved favorable outcomes after arthroscopic surgery; especially, the failure rate was 0%.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Localized Tenosynovial Giant-Cell Tumor of the Foot and Ankle: A Case Series

Background

Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCTTS), also termed Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), is a locally aggressive tumor which originates from tendon sheaths or bursas. Around 3-5% of these tumors arise from foot and ankle. Localized lesions in this area are often manifested as firm masses or nodules with slow but continuous progression through months and years. Pain associated with weight-bearing, as well as limitations in joint motions, may be reported, depending on tumor's location. Surgery is the treatment of choice for the definitive removal of GCTTSs with the aim to eradicate the neoplasm and restore the lower limb's functionality.

Methods

Thirteen cases suffering from GCTTS of the foot and ankle underwent surgical resection at our institution between 2017 and 2022. For each case we recorded pre-operative and post-operative symptoms, as well as their pre-operative and post-operative functional status according to both MSTS and AOFAS scores. Eventual complications and local recurrences were reported.

Results

Each patient experienced an at least mild pain before surgical treatment. The mean pre-operative MSTS and AOFAS scores were 22.8 and 70.7, respectively. The mean tumor size was 17.7 mm. Each patient received a resection with wide margins. Two cases (15.4%) had local recurrences. None had major complications at their latest follow-up. After the surgery, the mean post-operative MSTS and AOFAS scores increased to 28.3 and 92.2, respectively.

Conclusion

Resection with wide margins for foot and ankle GCTTS is effective in restoring the patients' lower limb functionality and is associated with reasonable local recurrence rates.

Current therapies and future prospective for locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors

Locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of soft tissue and bone tumors with intermediate histology, incompletely understood biology, and highly variable natural history. Despite having a limited to absent ability to metastasize and excellent survival prognosis, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors can be symptomatic, require prolonged and repeat treatments including surgery and chemotherapy, and can severely impact patients' quality of life. The management of locally aggressive tumors has evolved over the years with a focus on minimizing morbid treatments. Extensive oncologic surgeries and radiation are pillars of care for high grade sarcomas, however, play a more limited role in management of locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors, due to propensity for local recurrence despite resection, and the risk of transformation to a higher-grade entity following radiation. Patients should ideally be evaluated in specialized sarcoma centers that can coordinate complex multimodal decision-making, taking into consideration the individual patient's clinical presentation and history, as well as any available prognostic factors into customizing therapy. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology, clinical management, and future treatment frontiers for three representative locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors: desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). These entities challenge clinicians with their unpredictable behavior and responses to treatment, and still lack a well-defined standard of care despite recent progress with newly approved or promising experimental drugs.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) Registry: A 2-Year Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Treatment Strategies

BACKGROUND

The Tenosynovial giant cell tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) registry is an international prospective study that -previously described the impact of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a baseline snapshot. This analysis describes the impact of D-TGCT at 2-year follow-up based on treatment strategies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TOPP was conducted at 12 sites (EU: 10; US: 2). Captured PRO measurements assessed at baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Interference, BPI Pain Severity, Worst Pain, EQ-5D-5L, Worst Stiffness, and -Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Treatment interventions were no current/planned treatment (Off-Treatment) and systemic treatment/surgery (On-Treatment).

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients (mean age: 43.5 years) were included in the full analysis set. For patients without active treatment strategy -(Off-Treatment) at baseline (n = 79), BPI Pain Interference (1.00 vs. 2.86) and BPI Pain Severity scores (1.50 vs. 3.00) were numerically favorable in patients remaining Off-Treatment compared with those who switched to an active treatment strategy at year 1. From 1-year to 2-year -follow-ups, patients who remained Off-Treatment had better BPI Pain Interference (0.57 vs. 2.57) and Worst Pain (2.0 vs. 4.5) scores compared with patients who switched to an alternative treatment strategy. In addition, EQ-5D VAS scores (80.0 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who remained -Off-Treatment between 1-year and 2-year follow-ups compared with patients who changed treatment strategy. For patients receiving systemic treatment at baseline, numerically favorable scores were seen in patients remaining on systemic therapy at 1-year follow-up: BPI Pain Interference (2.79 vs. 5.93), BPI Pain Severity (3.63 vs. 6.38), Worst Pain (4.5 vs. 7.5), and Worst Stiffness (4.0 vs. 7.5). From 1-year to 2-year follow-up, EQ-5D VAS scores (77.5 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who changed from systemic treatment to a different treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the impact D-TGCT has on patient quality of life, and how treatment strategies may be influenced by these outcome measures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02948088).

Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath: A report of 216 cases

BACKGROUND

In this article on giant cell tumor of tendon sheath (GCTTS), we intend to summarize and analyze the clinical and pathological features of GCTTS hoping to improve clinical management and patient treatment.

METHODS

The study retrospectively reviewed 216 patients of GCTTS, registered at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2010 to December 2020. These cases were diagnosed by surgical excision. The clinicopathological features and the prognosis were reviewed in the light of the current literature.

RESULTS

Of these 216 GCTTS patients, 72 were males (33.3%) and 144 females (66.7%), with a ratio male-to-female of 1:2. The patients' age ranged from 5 to 82, the average being 41.5 years at diagnosis. A total of 96 cases (44.4%) occurred in the hand region, followed by 35 cases (16.2%) in the knee, 32 cases (14.8%) in the foot, 25 cases (11.6%) in the ankle, 12 cases (5.6%) in the wrist, 12 cases (5.6%) in the leg, 2 cases (0.9%) in the head, 1 case (0.5%) in the forearm, and 1 case (0.5%) inside and outside the spinal channel. Histopathology mainly revealed large synovial-like monocytes, small monocytes, and osteoclast-like giant cells.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that GCTTS predominantly occurs in the hands of young women. Complete surgical resection with long-term follow-up is the preferred management.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors of digits: MRI differentiation between localized types and diffuse types with pathology correlation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the MRI findings between the localized- and diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TSGCTs) of digits with pathology correlation.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with newly diagnosed TSGCTs of digits (22 localized and 6 diffuse types) who underwent preoperative MRI and surgical excision were included from Jan. 2015 to September 2021. MRI findings regarding nodularity, margins, morphology of hypointensity with pathology correlation, and disease extent (bone erosion, articular involvement, muscle involvement, tendon destruction, and neurovascular encasement) were assessed.

RESULTS

Diffuse type was significantly larger (P = 0.006), more multinodular on both MRI and pathology (P = 0.038, both) with significant agreement, and infiltrative on both MRI and pathology (P < 0.001, both) with substantial agreement, and showed central granular on MRI and strong hemosiderin deposition on pathology (P = 0.022 and P = 0.021) with moderate agreement than localized type. Localized type showed significantly more frequent peripheral capsules on both MRI and pathology (P < 0.001, both) with moderate agreement than diffuse type. However, the septum on both MRI and pathology showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.529 and P = 0.372) without significant agreement. The disease extent was more severe in the diffuse type than the localized type regarding articular involvement (P < 0.001), muscle involvement (P < 0.001), and tendon destruction (P = 0.010). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding bone erosion (P = 0.196) or neurovascular bundle encasement (P = 0.165).

CONCLUSIONS

Diffuse-type TSGCTs of digits presented as locally aggressive lesions with larger, multinodular, infiltrative masses exhibiting stronger hemosiderin deposition and more severe disease extents of articular, muscle, and tendon involvement than the localized type.

One-Stage Synovectomies Result in Improved Short-Term Outcomes Compared to Two-Stage Synovectomies of Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (D-TGCT) of the Knee: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors' (D-TGCTs) intra- and extra-articular expansion about the knee often necessitates an anterior and posterior surgical approach to facilitate an extensive synovectomy. There is no consensus on whether two-sided synovectomies should be performed in one or two stages. This retrospective study included 191 D-TGCT patients from nine sarcoma centers worldwide to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes between both treatments. Secondary outcomes were rates of radiological progression and subsequent treatments. Between 2000 and 2020, 117 patients underwent one-stage and 74 patients underwent two-stage synovectomies. The maximum range of motion achieved within one year postoperatively was similar (flexion 123-120°, p = 0.109; extension 0°, p = 0.093). Patients undergoing two-stage synovectomies stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred more often after two-stage synovectomies, although this was not statistically different (36% vs. 24%, p = 0.095). Patients treated with two-stage synovectomies exhibited more radiological progression and required subsequent treatments more often than patients treated with one-stage synovectomies (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.036) (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, D-TGCT of the knee requiring two-side synovectomies should be treated by one-stage synovectomies if feasible, since patients achieve a similar range of motion, do not have more complications, but stay for a shorter time in the hospital.

MRI of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour in the knee: a guide for diagnosis and treatment response assessment

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare soft-tissue tumour originating from synovial lining of joints, bursae and tendon sheaths. The tumour comprises two subtypes: the localised-type (L-TGCT) is characterised by a single, well-defined lesion, whereas the diffuse-type (D-TGCT) consists of multiple lesions without clear margins. D-TGCT was previously known as pigmented villonodular synovitis. Although benign, TGCT can behave locally aggressive, especially the diffuse-type. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice to diagnose TGCT and discriminate between subtypes. MRI can also provide a preoperative map before synovectomy, the mainstay of treatment. Finally, since the arrival of colony-stimulating factor 1-receptor inhibitors, a novel systemic therapy for D-TGCT patients with relapsed or inoperable disease, MRI is key in assessing treatment response. As recurrence after treatment of D-TGCT occurs more often than in L-TGCT, follow-up imaging plays an important role in D-TGCT. Reading follow-up MRIs of these diffuse synovial tumours may be a daunting task. Therefore, this educational review focuses on MRI findings in D-TGCT of the knee, which represents the most involved joint site (approximately 70% of patients). We aim to provide a systematic approach to assess the knee synovial recesses, highlight D-TGCT imaging findings, and combine these into a structured report. In addition, differential diagnoses mimicking D-TGCT, potential pitfalls and evaluation of tumour response following systemic therapies are discussed. Finally, we propose automated volumetric quantification of D-TGCT as the next step in quantitative treatment response assessment as an alternative to current radiological assessment criteria.

Surgical treatment of spinal tenosynovial giant cell tumor: Experience from a single center and literature review

Introduction

Spinal tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare benign primary spinal tumor with aggressive behavior. The treatment strategy and prognosis of spinal TGCT remain unclear. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of spinal TGCT.

Methods

We enrolled 18 patients with spinal TGCT who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital between January 2002 and January 2021. Additionally, we reviewed 72 cases of spinal TGCT with surgical treatment reported in the previous literature. Therefore, a total of 90 cases of spinal TGCT were evaluated for their clinical characteristics, surgical details, radiotherapy, and prognosis.

Results

In terms of the extent of resection, 73 cases (81.1%) underwent gross total resection (GTR), and 17 cases (18.9%) underwent subtotal resection (STR). Regarding the technique of GTR, 12 cases (16.7%) underwent en bloc resection, while 60 cases (83.3%) underwent piecemeal resection. During a median follow-up duration of 36 months (range: 3-528 months), 17.8% (16/90) cases experienced local recurrence/progression. The local recurrence/progression rate in cases that underwent GTR was 8.2% (6/73), which was significantly lower than that in cases with STR (58.8%, 10/17) (p<0.001). The local recurrence/progression rate of en bloc resection was 8.3% (1/12), and that of piecemeal resection was 8.3% (5/60). Twelve cases underwent perioperative adjuvant radiotherapy, and one (8.3%, 1/12) of them showed disease progression during follow-up. Six recurrent/progressive lesions were given radiotherapy and all of them remained stable in the subsequent follow-up. Eight recurrent/progressive lesions were only treated with re-operation without radiotherapy, and half of them (50.0%, 4/8) demonstrated repeated recurrence/progression in the subsequent follow-up.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment could be effective for spinal TGCT cases, and GTR is the preferred surgical strategy. Piecemeal resection may be appropriate for spinal TGCT cases with an acceptable local recurrence/progression rate. Perioperative adjuvant radiotherapy may reduce the risk of postoperative local recurrence/progression, and radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of recurrent/unresectable spinal TGCT lesions.

Best clinical management of tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT): A consensus paper from the community of experts

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal tumor arising from the joints, bursa and tendon sheaths. TGCT comprises a nodular- and a diffuse-type, with the former exhibiting mostly indolent course and the latter a locally aggressive behavior. Although usually not life-threatening, TGCT may cause chronic pain and adversely impact function and quality of life (QoL). CSFR1 inhibitors are effective with benefit on symptoms and QoL but are not available in most countries. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of TGCT make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, with suboptimal outcomes for patients. A global consensus meeting was organized in June 2022, involving experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from SPAGN to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach to TGCT and generate the recommendations presented herein.

Pexidartinib Provides Modest Pain Relief in Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Results From ENLIVEN

BACKGROUND

The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of orally administered PLX3397 in patients with pigmented villonodular synovitis or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (ENLIVEN) showed that pexidartinib provides a robust objective tumor response in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) not amenable to improvement with surgery. Based on these results, in 2019, pexidartinib received accelerated approval in the United States in this population as a breakthrough therapy under an orphan drug designation. However, the ability of pexidartinib to relieve pain in ENLIVEN was not fully detailed, and the relationship between pain relief and objective tumor response was not described.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What level of pain relief was achieved by pexidartinib treatment in ENLIVEN? (2) How was pain relief related to objective tumor responses? (3) How durable was pain relief?

METHODS

The current study included planned primary and exploratory assessments of patient-assessed worst pain at the site of the tumor in the ENLIVEN trial. ENLIVEN was a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which adults with TGCT not amenable to improvement with surgery received pexidartinib or placebo for 24 weeks, after which eligible patients could receive open-label pexidartinib. Of 174 patients assessed for eligibility, 121 were randomized (50% [60] to placebo, 50% [61] to pexidartinib), and 120 were given either placebo or pexidartinib (59 received placebo and 61 received pexidartinib) and were included in an intent-to-treat analysis. Fifty-nine percent (71 of 120) of the overall treated population was female, and 88% (106 of 120) were White. Mean age was 45 ± 13 years. Tumors were mostly in the lower extremities (92% [110 of 120]), most commonly in the knee (61% [73 of 120]) and ankle (18% [21 of 120]). As a secondary outcome, patients scored worst pain at the site of the tumor in the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The primary definition of a pain response was a decrease of at least 30% in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score and increase of less than 30% in narcotic analgesic use between baseline and week 25. Planned exploratory assessments of pain included the frequency of a pain response using alternative thresholds, including a decrease in worst-pain NRS score of 50% or more and a decrease of at least 2 points (minimum clinically important difference [MCID]), the magnitude of pain reduction between baseline and week 25, correlation between worst-pain NRS score and tumor shrinkage by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the durability of the pain response during the open-label extension. Pain responses during the randomized portion of the trial were compared according to intention-to-treat analysis, with a one-sided threshold of p < 0.025 to reduce the risk of false-positive results. Pain assessment was complete for 59% (35 of 59) of patients in the placebo group and 54% (33 of 61) of patients in the pexidartinib group. Demographic and disease characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

A difference in the primary assessment of a pain response was not detected between pexidartinib and placebo (response percentage 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 15% [9 of 59] [95% CI 8% to 27%]; one-sided p = 0.03). In the exploratory analyses, pexidartinib provided a modest improvement in pain (response percentage 26% [16 of 61] [95% CI 17% to 38%] versus 10% [6 of 59] [95% CI 5% to 20%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the 50% threshold and 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 14% [8 of 59] [95% CI 7% to 25%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the MCID threshold). The least-squares mean change in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score between baseline and week 25 was larger in patients treated with pexidartinib than placebo (-2.5 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.9] versus -0.3 [95% CI -0.9 to 0.3]; p < 0.001), although the mean difference between the two groups (-2.2 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.4]) was just over the MCID. Improvement in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score correlated with the reduction in tumor size (r = 0.44; p < 0.001) and tumor volume score (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). For patients in the open-label extension, the change in the worst-pain NRS score from baseline was similar to the change at the end of the randomized portion and just above the MCID (mean -2.7 ± 2.2 after 25 weeks and -3.3 ± 1.7 after 50 weeks of receiving pexidartinib).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current study, a modest reduction in pain, just larger than the MCID, may be an added benefit of pexidartinib in these patients, although the findings are insufficient to justify the routine use of pexidartinib for pain relief.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Expanding the molecular spectrum of tenosynovial giant cell tumors

Background

While great advances in clinical and pathological description of tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) have been made, TGCT molecular heterogeneity represents an ongoing challenge. The canonical oncogenic fusion CSF1::COL6A3 is not systematically observed, suggesting that other oncogenic mechanisms are involved in tumorigenesis. This study aims to explore by RNA sequencing a retrospective series of tumors diagnosed as TGCT, in order to provide a better description of their molecular landscape and to correlate molecular features with clinical data.

Methods

We analyzed clinicopathological data and performed whole-exome RNA sequencing on 41 TGCT samples.

Results

RNAseq analysis showed significant higher CSF1 and CSF1-R expression than a control panel of 2642 solid tumors. RNA sequencing revealed fusion transcripts in 14 patients including 6 not involving CSF1 and some previously unreported fusions. Unsupervised clustering on the expression profiles issued from this series suggested two distinct subgroups: one composed of various molecular subtypes including CSF1 and FN1 rearranged samples and one composed of four tumors harboring an HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion, suggesting distinct tumor entities. Overall, 15 patients received at least one systemic anti-CSF1R treatment and clinical improvement was observed in 11 patients, including patients from both clusters.

Discussion

This study reported molecular heterogeneity in TGCT, contrasting with the clinical and pathological homogeneity and the ubiquitous high CSF1 and CSF1R expression levels. Whether molecular diversity may impact the efficacy of systemic treatments needs to be further investigated.

Localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor: a rare case of snapping hip

We report on a 40-year-old male with a 9-month-long history of snapping of his right hip caused by a previously undescribed etiology of internal extra-articular snapping hip, namely due to a localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Both dynamic ultrasound evaluation and MRI proved to be crucial in the diagnosis of this rare entity. Auto-provocation of the snapping showed an anterior hip mass moving posteriorly to the psoas tendon which elucidated the pain and clicking sensation. Subsequent MRI demonstrated a peripheral low-intensity rim due to hemosiderin deposition around the synovial mass which is indicative for pigmented villonodular tenosynovitis. Treatment consisted of arthroscopic shaver burr resection. Immediately postoperatively, the snapping sensation could not be provoked anymore by the patient. The purpose of reporting on this case report is to emphasize several successive learning points. First, dynamic ultrasound aids in diagnosis and differentiation of the types of snapping hip. Second, specific MRI features are suggestive of tenosynovial giant cell tumor, recognizing these traits may prevent delayed diagnosis and subsequent aggravated clinical course. Third, localized pigmented villonodular tenosynovitis around the hip may present as an internal extra-articular snapping hip and is of consideration in the differential diagnosis of recurrent snapping hip.

Surgical management of 144 diffuse-type TGCT patients in a single institution: A 20-year cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs). However, achieving a cure through surgery alone remains challenging, especially for the diffuse-type (D-TGCT).

METHODS

Our goal was to describe the surgical management of patients with D-TGCT related to large joints, treated between 2000 and 2020. We analyzed the effect of (in)complete resections and the presence of postoperative tumor (POT) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on radiological and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients underwent open surgery for D-TGCT, of which 58 (40%) had treatment before. The median follow-up was 65 months. One hundred twenty-five patients underwent isolated open surgeries, in which 25 (20%) patients' D-TGCT was intentionally removed incompletely. POT presence on the first postoperative MRI was observed in 64%. Both incomplete resections and POT presence were associated with higher rates of radiological progression (73% vs. 44%; Kaplan-Meier [KM] analysis p = 0.021) and 59% versus 7%; KM analysis p < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, patients with POT presence clinically worsened more often than patients without having POT (49% vs. 24%; KM analysis p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

D-TGCT is often resected incompletely and tumor presence is commonly observed on the first postoperative MRI, resulting in worse radiological and clinical outcomes. Therefore, surgeons should try to remove D-TGCT in toto and consider other multimodal therapeutic strategies.

Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase II study of zaltoprofen for patients with diffuse-type and unresectable localized tenosynovial giant cell tumors: The REALIZE study

Background

A tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm arising from intra- or extra-articular tissue, categorized as localized (L-TGCT, solitary lesion) and diffuse (D-TGCT, multiple lesions) TGCT. Surgical excision is the mainstay of the treatment, and a high local recurrence rate of approximately 50% has been reported. We focused on zaltoprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that can activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and inhibit the proliferation of TGCT stromal cells. Therefore, we conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of zaltoprofen in patients with D-TGCTs or unresectable L-TGCTs.

Methods

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of zaltoprofen. In the treatment group, zaltoprofen (480 mg/day) was administered for 48 weeks; the placebo group received similar dosages without zaltoprofen. The primary outcome was progression-free rate (PFR) 48 weeks after treatment administration. Disease progression was defined as the following conditions requiring surgical intervention: 1) repetitive joint swelling due to hemorrhage, 2) joint range of motion limitation, 3) invasion of the adjacent cartilage or bone, 4) severe joint space narrowing, and 5) increased tumor size (target lesion).

Results

Forty-one patients were allocated to the zaltoprofen (n=21) or placebo (n=20) groups. The PFR was not significant between the zaltoprofen group and the placebo group at 48 weeks (84.0% and 90.0%, respectively; p=0.619). The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association knee score significantly improved from baseline to week 48 in the zaltoprofen group (85.38 versus 93.75, p=0.027). There was a significant difference between the values at 48 weeks of placebo and zaltoprofen group (p=0.014). One severe adverse event (grade 3 hypertension) was observed in the zaltoprofen group.

Discussion

This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zaltoprofen in patients with TGCT. No significant differences in PFR were observed between the groups at 48 weeks. Physical function significantly improved after zaltoprofen treatment. The safety profile of zaltoprofen was acceptable. This less invasive and safer treatment with zaltoprofen, compared to surgical removal, could be justified as a novel approach to treating TGCT. Further analysis of long-term administration of zaltoprofen should be considered in future studies.

Clinical Trial Registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, identifier (UMIN000025901).

PD-L1 Status in Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors

Background and Objectives: Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TSGCTs) are benign soft tissue tumors that are divided into localized- and diffuse-type tumors, according to the World Health Organization classification of soft tissue tumours. The diffuse-type TSGCT sometimes behave aggressively and poses treatment challenges especially in patients with neurovascular involvement. Symptomatic patients who are not good candidates for surgery due to high morbidity risk may benefit from medical therapy. Objectives: Drugs that target programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are among a new generation of medical therapy options, which, recently, have been explored and have displayed promising results in various cancer types; therefore, we aimed to investigate the PD-L1 status of TSGCTs as a possible therapeutic target. Materials and Methods: We assessed the PD-L1 status of 20 patients (15 men and 5 women, median age = 39 years) that had been diagnosed with TSGCTs in a single institution, between 2018 and 2020. The patients had localized- (n = 7) and diffuse-type (n = 13) TSGCTs. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks were retrospectively retrieved from the pathology department. An immunohistochemical analysis was performed in sections of 3 micron thickness from these blocks. Results: Seventy-five percent of our patients with TSGCTs were immunopositive to PD-L1 staining. Conclusions: Taking into consideration the high positivity rate of PD-L1 staining in TSGCTs, PD-L1 blockage may be used as a valuable medical treatment for TSGCTs; however, further studies are needed.

New Drug Approvals for Sarcoma in the Last 5 Years

Sarcoma and locally aggressive connective tissue tumors are a complex group of diseases with a growing number of histotypes in the most recent WHO classification. Most of these tumors are rare (incidence <6/10⁵/y) or ultrarare (<1/10⁶/y). Despite their rarity, sarcomas are often good models for the development of personalized medicine, and a large number of new clinical trials in select histotypes and molecular subsets were reported during the past 5 years, leading to a faster rate of new drug approvals. We analyzed the published literature and the abstracts reported in major congresses dedicated to sarcoma and connective tissue tumor management in the last 5 years. Several targeted therapies, cytotoxic treatments, and immunotherapies have demonstrated activity in dedicated histologic and molecular subtypes of sarcomas. The majority of the studies for ultrarare entities are uncontrolled studies, as a consequence of the rarity of histotypes, but randomized controlled trials were available in the less rare histotypes. Most successful trials were based on biomarker selection, which were often driver molecular alterations, while a large number of ongoing research programs aim to identify biomarkers in parallel to new drug development. Availability of the new agents varies across countries. This article describes the new drugs that made it through to the finish line and new agents with promising activity that are in later stages of investigation in the large family of malignant connective tissue tumors.

Treatment updates on tenosynovial giant cell tumor

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (dt-TGCT) is a benign clonal neoplastic proliferation arising from the synovium. Patients are often symptomatic, require multiple surgical procedures during their lifetime, and have reduced quality of life (QoL). Surgery is the main treatment with relapse rates ranging from 14 to 55%. The treatment strategy for patients with dt-TGCT is evolving. The purpose of this review is to describe current treatment options, and to highlight recent developments in the knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of dt-TGCT as well as related therapeutic implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

TGCT cells overexpress colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1), resulting in recruitment of CSF1 receptor (CSF1R)-bearing macrophages that are polyclonal and make up the bulk of the tumor, has led to clinical trials with CSF1R inhibitors. These inhibitors include small molecules such as pexidatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, DCC-3014 (vimseltinib), and the monoclonal antibody RG7155 (emactuzumab).

SUMMARY

In conclusion, D-TGCT impairs patients' QoL. The evidence that the pathogenetic loop of D-TGCT can be inhibited has changed the therapeutic armamentarium for this condition. Clinical trials of agents that target CSF1R are currently ongoing. All this new evidence should be taken into consideration within multidisciplinary management.

Extensile Anterior and Posterior Knee Exposure for Complete Synovectomy of Diffuse Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis)

Diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), also known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a benign, neoplastic disease of the synovium that can lead to joint destruction, osteoarthritis, and long-term morbidity^1,2. Often, there is extra-articular involvement in the intercondylar notch and posterior soft tissues. A complete anterior and posterior synovectomy of the knee is indicated for treating diffuse TGCT when the anterior and posterior compartments of the knee joint are involved. Additionally, either an anterior or posterior synovectomy may be performed when the TGCT is limited to 1 compartment of the knee. Although an anterior synovectomy is relatively straightforward technically, a posterior synovectomy is challenging because of the presence of the neurovascular and muscular structures, which limit access, and because of the infrequency of the procedure.

Description

The surgical technique for open anterior and posterior knee synovectomy is performed under 1 anesthetic via separate exposures with the patient initially supine and then prone. In cases of focal TGCT, in which both the anterior and posterior compartments are involved, either an anterior or posterior approach can be utilized in isolation to target the affected compartment. The anterior approach is performed via anteromedial parapatellar arthrotomy, with care to preserve the meniscal attachments and ligaments. Once the suprapatellar pouch is visualized, all tissue deep to the quadriceps muscle and tendon, extending around to the femoral periosteum, is excised en bloc. Attention is then turned to the undersurface of the patella, fat pad, distal aspect of the femur, and proximal aspect of the tibia. The tumor may be embedded within the fat pad and must be removed. Any tumor remnants within the medial or lateral gutter or beneath the menisci are excised with use of a standard or pituitary rongeur or curets. The quadriceps tendon, subcutaneous tissue, and skin are closed over a deep drain, and the patient is turned prone and re-prepared for the posterior approach. The posterior synovectomy utilizes an S-shaped incision either superolateral to inferomedial or superomedial to inferolateral, depending on the location of the TGCT. The popliteal artery and vein and the tibial and common peroneal nerves are identified, mobilized, and protected during retraction. This step requires ligating the geniculate and other small branches of the popliteal artery and vein. To expose the posterior femoral condyle, the medial and/or lateral heads of the gastrocnemius must be tagged and released by dividing the myotendinous origin from the posterior aspect of the femur at the proximal extent of the condyle.

Alternatives

Although surgical resection is the primary treatment for TGCT, nonsurgical alternatives include radiation therapy (either external beam or radiosynoviorthesis) and the use of pharmacologic agents. Radiation therapy is associated with complications such as irreversible skin changes, arthrofibrosis, arthritis, osteonecrosis, and radiation-induced sarcoma^1,2. Systemic agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., nilotinib and imatinib) or agents targeting the CSF-1 (colony-stimulating factor-1) pathway (e.g., pexidartinib and emactuzumab) are active against TGCT. The agents are typically employed in recurrent, advanced, and unresectable situations in which surgical morbidity would outweigh the therapeutic benefit². Aside from open synovectomy, arthroscopic synovectomy-usually anterior-has been utilized by some centers.

Rationale

To our knowledge, there is no Level-I study indicating the superiority of 1 surgical technique over the other treatments for diffuse TGCT. Anterior arthroscopic synovectomy, in isolation, for diffuse TGCT has demonstrated recurrence rates as high as 92% to 94%¹. Recent studies comparing anterior and posterior open and arthroscopic synovectomy have demonstrated mixed results, are limited by being retrospective, and are subject to selection bias because of the open synovectomy being selected for more extensive disease^2,3. The mixed results may a result of variation in both tumor size and location about the knee joint². The benefit of an open anterior and posterior synovectomy is that it can provide optimal exposure for large and extra-articular tumor masses that would not be accessible using an arthroscopic approach and allows for complete, gross total excision without morsellization of the tumor. The surgeon must be familiar and facile with vascular dissection techniques, even if the soft tissues surrounding the vascular structures are preserved as much as possible, in an effort to minimize postoperative edema⁴.

Expected Outcomes

Open anterior and posterior synovectomy provides improved exposure for large and extra-articular tumor masses and has a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 29% to 33%^5-7. Pain associated with diffuse TGCT has been demonstrated to improve in 59% of cases, with swelling reported to improve by 72% in patients following surgical intervention⁷. No significant difference has been reported when comparing open versus arthroscopic synovectomy in terms of arthritic progression, with 8% of patients progressing to a total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 40 months³.

Important Tips

Careful preoperative planning is crucial: note all locations of posteriorly located tumor on magnetic resonance imaging and in relation to anatomic landmarks and neurovascular structures in order to guide dissection.It can be advantageous to have multiple blunt retractor options available when dissecting in tight spaces.Be prepared for vessel ligation with free ties, vessel clips, and additional clamps.The technical ability to dissect and mobilize the popliteal vessels is essential, but this step can be tedious.At the time of incision, preserve the integrity of the popliteal fascia to facilitate a good closure later, as this step avoids the herniation of tissues in the popliteal fossa. Because this fascial tissue is fragile, the use of a monofilament rather than braided suture in addition to the placement of far-near-near-far-type figure-of-8 sutures minimizes the risk of tearing the fascia during reapproximation.To ease retraction of the soft tissues, slightly flex the knee to relax the hamstring and other muscles and neurovascular structures. This will also reduce the risk of a postoperative nerve palsy.Although separate instruments for the anterior and posterior portions of the procedure are not necessary, separate drapes, gown, and gloves and other preoperative preparation should be readied in advance for the second portion of the procedure in order to save operative time.

Acronyms & Abbreviations

PVNS = pigmented villonodular synovitisROM = range of motionMRI = magnetic resonance imagingGastroc = gastrocnemiusPDS = polydioxanone sutureCAM = controlled ankle motionASA = acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin).

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT): molecular biology, drug targets and non-surgical pharmacological approaches

INTRODUCTION

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a mono-articular, benign or locally aggressive and often debilitating neoplasm. Systemic therapies are becoming part of the multimodal armamentarium when surgery alone will not confer improvements. Since TGCT is characterized by colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF1) rearrangements, the most studied molecular pathway is the CSF1 and CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) axis. Inhibiting CSF1-CSF1R interaction often yields considerable radiological and clinical responses; however, adverse events may cause treatment discontinuation because of an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio in benign disease. Only Pexidartinib is approved by the US FDA; however, the European Medicines Agency has not approved it due to uncertainties on the risk-benefit ratio. Thus, there is a need for safer and effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Light is shed on disease mechanisms and potential drug targets. The safety and efficacy of different systemic therapies are evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

The CSF1-CSF1R axis is the principal drug target; however, the effect of CSF1R inhibition on angiogenesis and the role of macrophages, which are essential in the postoperative course, needs further elucidation. Systemic therapies have a promising role in treating mainly diffuse-type, TGCT patients who are not expected to clinically improve from surgery. Future drug development should focus on targeting neoplastic TGCT cells.

Surgical Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Economic Burden in Patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Who Underwent Joint Surgery in the United States

Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) are rare and locally aggressive neoplasms in synovium, bursae, and tendon sheaths, which cause pain, joint dysfunction, and damage to the affected joints. Objective: To evaluate the surgical patterns and economic burden among patients with TGCT who underwent joint surgery in the United States. Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with TGCT, aged 18-64 years, who underwent joint surgery post-TGCT diagnosis were identified from the OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc database (Q1/1999-Q1/2017). Patients were required to be continuously enrolled for ≥1 year before and ≥3 years after the first TGCT diagnosis (index date). Surgical patterns were assessed post-index. Healthcare resource utilization and associated healthcare costs, and indirect costs related to work loss in year 1, year 2, and year 3 post-index, were compared with those at baseline. Results: Of 835 eligible TGCT patients, 462 (55%) patients who had ≥1 joint surgery post-index were included. During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 78% of patients underwent their first joint surgery in year 1 and 41% had ≥1 repeat surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging utilization was highest during baseline (46%) and declined afterward (28%, 17%, and 19% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and physical therapy, occupational therapy, and rehabilitation services, were commonly used during baseline (45%, 40%, and 30%, respectively). More patients used opioids in year 1 vs baseline (78% vs 45%; P<0.0001), while its utilization return to baseline levels in year 2 (41%) and year 3 (42%). A similar pattern was observed for NSAIDs and physical/occupational therapy/rehabilitation services. Healthcare resource utilization and associated healthcare costs surged in year 1 and returned to baseline or lower in years 2 and 3. A similar pattern was observed for indirect costs associated with work loss. Discussion: The high proportion of patients undergoing repeat surgeries and prevalent use of opioids, NSAIDs, and physical/occupational therapy/rehabilitation services suggests an unmet medical need after surgical treatment. Conclusions: Surgical resection alone might be inadequate to control TGCT. New treatment options may complement surgery and alleviate the clinical and economic burden experienced by patients with TGCT who had received prior surgery.

Results from Phase I Extension Study Assessing Pexidartinib Treatment in Six Cohorts with Solid Tumors including TGCT, and Abnormal CSF1 Transcripts in TGCT

PURPOSE

To assess the response to pexidartinib treatment in six cohorts of adult patients with advanced, incurable solid tumors associated with colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) and/or KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From this two-part phase I, multicenter study, pexidartinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets CSF1R, KIT, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), was evaluated in six adult patient cohorts (part 2, extension) with advanced solid tumors associated with dysregulated CSF1R. Adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and tumor responses were assessed for all patients; patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) were also evaluated for tumor volume score (TVS) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). CSF1 transcripts and gene expression were explored in TGCT biopsies.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were treated: TGCT patients (n = 39) had a median treatment duration of 511 days, while other solid tumor patients (n = 52) had a median treatment duration of 56 days. TGCT patients had response rates of 62% (RECIST 1.1) and 56% (TVS) for the full analysis set. PRO assessments for pain showed improvement in patient symptoms, and 76% (19/25) of TGCT tissue biopsy specimens showed evidence of abnormal CSF1 transcripts. Pexidartinib treatment of TGCT resulted in tumor regression and symptomatic benefit in most patients. Pexidartinib toxicity was manageable over the entire study.

CONCLUSIONS

These results offer insight into outcome patterns in cancers whose biology suggests use of a CSF1R inhibitor. Pexidartinib results in tumor regression in TGCT patients, providing prolonged control with an acceptable safety profile.

Treatment, recurrence rates and follow-up of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) of the foot and ankle-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a usually benign lesion which arises from the synovium. It affects joints, tendon sheaths and bursae. The clinical course is often unpredictable, and local recurrences frequently occur. The aim of this study was to describe different treatment options, surgical complications, and to develop a follow-up regime based on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of foot and ankle lesions.

Methods and results

1284 studies published between 01/1966 and 06/2021 were identified. 25 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 382 patients. Of these, 212 patients had a diffuse (dTGCT) and 170 a localized (lTGCT) TGCT. Patients with a dTGCT had a mean age of 36.6±8.2 years, and 55% were female. The overall complication rate was 24% in dTGCT, irrespective of the therapeutic procedure; the mean follow-up was 37.9±27.4 months with a recurrence rate of 21%, and recurrences occurred between 3 and 144 months, the vast majority (86%) within the first 5 years following intervention. Patients with a lTGCT had a mean age of 31.2±5.7 years, and 53% were female. Complications occurred in 12%. The mean follow-up was 51.1±24.6 months, the recurrence rate was 7%, and recurrence occurred between 1 and 244 months after intervention.

Conclusion

Diffuse TGCTs of the foot and ankle region have a remarkable recurrence rate irrespective of therapeutic procedures, and most lesions reoccurred within 5, with more than half of these in the first 2 years. The lTGCTs are well treatable lesions, with a low recurrence and a moderate complication rate. Based on these findings, we propose a follow-up regime for the dTGCT including a clinical survey and MR imaging 3 months after surgical intervention (baseline), followed by twice-yearly intervals for the first 2 years, yearly intervals up to the fifth year, and further individual follow-up due to the fact that recurrences can even occur for years later. For the lTGCT a clinical survey and MRT is proposed after 3–6 months after intervention (baseline), followed by annual clinical examination for 3 years, and in case of symptoms MR-imaging. Larger prospective multi-center studies are necessary to confirm these results and recommendations.

Differential diagnosis of fibroma of tendon sheath and giant cell tumor of tendon sheath in the finger using signal intensity on T2 magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of fibroma of tendon sheath (FTS) and giant cell tumor of tendon sheath (GCTTS) on the basis of clinical and radiographic characteristics remains difficult.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quantitative measurement of signal intensity (SI) obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the differential diagnosis of FTS and GCTTS in just the finger.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with FTS (n = 6) and GCTTS (n = 22) of the finger who were treated at our hospitals between April 2011 and August 2019. Two researchers independently reviewed the MRIs and measured the regions of interest (ROIs) in the tumor and flexor tendon from the same image. The SI ratio obtained for the tumor and tendon ROIs was measured and compared using receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The SI ratios (mean ± SD) of FTS and GCTTS were 1.83 ± 0.64 and 6.34 ± 3.16 for researcher 1 and 1.82 ± 0.60 and 6.10 ± 3.22 for researcher 2, respectively. The areas under the curve were 0.970 and 0.970 for researchers 1 and 2, respectively. The cut-off values of the SI ratio as determined by researchers 1 and 2 for differentiating FTS from GCTTS were 3.00 and 3.00, respectively (sensitivity = 95.5%, specificity = 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The SI ratio is useful for differentiating FTS from GCTTS independent of a combination of tumor signal and shape.

Tumor location and type affect local recurrence and joint damage in tenosynovial giant cell tumor: a multi-center study

Osteochondral destruction and a high recurrence rate after surgery are major concerns that make difficult the treatment course of tenosynovial giant cell tumor. The aims of this study were to elucidate rates of postoperative local recurrence and osteochondral destruction, as correlated with various demographic factors. Eighty surgically treated patients with intra-articular tumors (knee: 49, ankle and foot: 12, hip: 10, others: 9) were included in this study. Factors including age, disease type (diffuse/localized), location, existence of osteochondral destruction were correlated with local recurrence or development/progression of osteochondral destruction. The 5-year local recurrence free survival rate was 71.4%. Diffuse type (n = 59, localized: n = 21) (P = 0.023) and knee location (P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for local recurrence. Diffuse type (P = 0.009) was a significant risk factor, and knee location (P = 0.001) was a negative factor for osteochondral destruction at the initial examination. Progression of osteochondral destruction was observed more often in cases with local recurrence (P = 0.040) and findings of osteochondral destruction at the initial examination (P = 0.029). Diffuse type is a factor that should be noted for both local recurrence and osteochondral destruction, while local recurrence occurs but osteochondral destruction is less observed in the knee.

The Economic Burden of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors Among Employed Workforce in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic burden of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) among US employed workforce.

METHODS

Patients with TGCT medical claims (N = 1395) and matched controls (1:10) without TGCT claims (N = 13,950) were identified from the OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. database (January 1, 1999 to March 31, 2017). Adjusted regression models were used to compare healthcare resource utilization, time lost from work, and associated costs between cohorts.

RESULTS

In patients with TGCT, the rates of inpatient admissions, emergency room visits, outpatient visits, and work loss days were 2.8, 1.5, 2.2, and 2.6 times those of matched controls, respectively (all P < 0.001). Total annual all-cause healthcare costs and work loss-related costs were $9368 and $2708 higher for TGCT patients than for matched controls, respectively (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TGCT was associated with a significant healthcare and work loss burden on US employers.

β-Arrestin2 Inhibits the Apoptosis and Facilitates the Proliferation of Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes in Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor

BACKGROUND/AIM

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare benign proliferative synovial neoplasm of uncertain etiology, and the efficacy of surgical resection is not satisfactory. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the pathogenesis and identify novel therapeutic targets for TGCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Synovial tissues were collected from patients with TGCT and osteoarthritis (OA). Differences of mRNA expression between TGCT and OA were explored using mRNA-seq. In addition, fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) were treated with small interfering RNA (siRNA) or adenovirus in order to knockdown or overexpress β-arrestin2 (Arrb2), respectively. FLS proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated using the MTT assay and the caspase 3 activity assay, respectively.

RESULTS

The expression of Arrb2 in TGCT was significantly higher than that in OA. The overexpression of Arrb2 promoted the proliferation of FLS and inhibited its apoptosis, while knocking down Arrb2 had the opposite effect. Further studies showed that Arrb2 can activate the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, leading to increased proliferation of TGCT.

CONCLUSION

Arrb2 facilitates the proliferation and inhibits the apoptosis of TGCT FLS through activating the PI3K-Akt cell survival pathway, providing new insight into the molecular mechanism of TGCT.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor in the Forefoot: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor is the common term used to describe a group of soft-tissue tumors that share a common etiologic link. These tumors are relatively infrequent in the foot and ankle, and occasionally they may be the cause of destruction of the adjacent bone structures. We report the imaging appearance and pathologic findings of two patients with localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the forefoot. Both of these patients underwent surgical gross total resection. However, one of the patients experienced a recurrence. Their clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, with their treatment protocol, are summarized retrospectively, and related literature is reviewed in an attempt to enhance the understanding of these tumor lesions. Clinicians should perform a careful preoperative and postoperative examination and complete tumor surgical resection with the aim of reducing local recurrence.

The diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (dt-TGCT) patient journey: a prospective multicenter study

Background

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm arising from the synovium of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths affecting small and large joints. It represents a wide spectrum ranging from minimally symptomatic to massively debilitating. Most findings to date are mainly from small, retrospective case series, and thus the morbidity and actual impact of this rare disease remain to be elucidated. This study prospectively explores the management of TGCT in tertiary sarcoma centers.

Methods

The TGCT Observational Platform Project registry was a multinational, multicenter, prospective observational study involving 12 tertiary sarcoma centers in 7 European countries, and 2 US sites. This study enrolled for 2 years all consecutive ≥ 18 years old patients, with histologically diagnosed primary or recurrent cases of diffuse-type TGCT. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and every 6 months for 24 months. Quality of life questionnaires (PROMIS-PF and EQ-5D) were also administered at the same time-points. Here we report baseline patient characteristics.

Results

166 patients were enrolled between November 2016 and March 2019. Baseline characteristics were: mean age 44 years (mean age at disease onset: 39 years), 139/166 (83.7%) had prior treatment, 71/166 patients (42.8%) had ≥ 1 recurrence after treatment of their primary tumor, 76/136 (55.9%) visited a medical specialist ≥ 5 times, 66/116 (56.9%) missed work in the 24 months prior to baseline, and 17/166 (11.6%) changed employment status or retired prematurely due to disease burden. Prior treatment consisted of surgery (i.e., arthroscopic, open synovectomy) (128/166; 77.1%) and systemic treatments (52/166; 31.3%) with imatinib (19/52; 36.5%) or pexidartinib (27/52; 51.9%). Treatment strategies at baseline visits consisted mainly of watchful waiting (81/166; 48.8%), surgery (41/166; 24.7%), or targeted systemic therapy (37/166; 22.3%). Patients indicated for treatment reported more impairment compared to patients indicated for watchful waiting: worst stiffness NRS 5.16/3.44, worst pain NRS 6.13/5.03, PROMIS-PF 39.48/43.85, and EQ-5D VAS 66.54/71.85.

Conclusion

This study confirms that diffuse-type TGCT can highly impact quality of life. A prospective observational registry in rare disease is feasible and can be a tool to collect curated-population reflective data in orphan diseases.

Name of registry: Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors (TGCT) Observational Platform Project (TOPP).

Trial registration number: NCT02948088.

Date of registration: 10 October 2016.

URL of Trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02948088?term=NCT02948088&draw=2.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01820-6.

Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts Plus Ex Vivo Models Enable Drug Validation for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive tumor with colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) signal expression. However, there is a lack of better in vivo and ex vivo models for TGCT. This study aims to establish a favorable preclinical translational platform, which would enable the validation of efficient and personalized therapeutic candidates for TGCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Histological analyses were performed for the included patients. Fresh TGCT tumors were collected and sliced into 1.0-3.0 mm³ sections using a sterilized razor blade. The tumor grafts were surgically implanted into subrenal capsules of athymic mice to establish patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) mouse models. Histological and response patterns to CSF1R inhibitors evaluations were analyzed. In addition, ex vivo cultures of patient-derived explants (PDEs) with endpoint analysis were used to validate TGCT graft response patterns to CSF1R inhibitors.

RESULTS

The TGCT tumor grafts that were implanted into athymic mice subrenal capsules maintained their original morphological and histological features. The "take" rate of this model was 95% (19/20). Administration of CSF1R inhibitors (PLX3397, and a novel candidate, WXFL11420306) to TGCT-PDTX mice was shown to reduce tumor size while inducing intratumoral apoptosis. In addition, the CSF1R inhibitors suppressed circulating nonspecific monocyte levels and CD163-positive cells within tumors. These response patterns of engrafts to PDTX were validated by ex vivo PDE cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Subrenal capsule supports the growth of TGCT tumor grafts, maintaining their original morphology and histology. This TGCT-PDTX model plus ex vivo explant cultures is a potential preclinical translational platform for locally aggressive tumors, such as TGCT.

Imaging of Soft Tissue Tumors

Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumors is challenging with imaging alone, including that by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. However, the accuracy of this differentiation has increased owing to the development of novel imaging technology. Detailed patient history and physical examination remain essential for differentiation between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Moreover, measurement only of tumor size based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria is insufficient for the evaluation of response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Change in metabolic activity measured by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or dynamic contrast enhanced-derived quantitative endpoints can more accurately evaluate treatment response compared to change in tumor size. Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately evaluate essential factors in surgical planning such as vascular or bone invasion and "tail sign". Thus, imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the upper cervical spine arising from the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane: a case report

A tenosynovial giant cell tumor is a benign proliferative disease, mostly arising from the synovial membrane of tendon sheaths, bursae, and joints. Axial skeleton involvement is very rare, but it is often found in the cervical spine. Spinal tenosynovial giant cell tumors often arise at the facet joints; a completely extra-articular spinal tenosynovial giant cell tumor is rare. We report an extremely rare case of tenosynovial giant cell tumor in the upper cervical spine that extended from the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane rather than the facet joint. Herein, the clinical and radiological findings will be reviewed to better our understanding of the characteristics of spinal tenosynovial giant cell tumors, and to help improve their diagnosis despite their non-typical locations of origin.

Short-Term Outcomes of Synovectomy and Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Diffuse-Type Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis

Diffuse-type pigmented villonodular synovitis is a rare benign disease that causes disorders of the knee, including erosion of subchondral bone and cyst formation, with eventual osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of synovectomy and total knee replacement in patients with the diffuse type of pigmented villonodular synovitis. From November 2011 to May 2015, we performed synovectomy and total knee replacement in 28 patients with diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis diagnosed on the basis of histopathology of biopsy specimens. Clinical data were collected perioperatively and during follow-up for evaluation of surgical efficacy. No intraoperative complications were encountered. Mean operative duration was 73.4 minutes (range: 47-115 minutes); mean estimated blood loss was 223.9 mL (range: 50-600 mL). The mean duration of follow-up was 58.7 months (range: 36-84 months). Mean range of motion improved from 86.1 ± 11.3 degrees (range: 60-100 degrees) to 107 ± 11.4 degrees (range: 90-130 degrees). Average Knee Society clinical scores improved from 38.9 ± 9.5 (range: 17-54) to 84.4 ± 6.1 (range: 75-98); functional scores improved from 48.9 ± 13.1 (range: 25-80) to 84.6 ± 6.1 (range: 75-95; p < 0.05 for both). Postoperative radiographs showed no signs of prosthesis loosening, periprosthetic fractures, or dislocation. The short-term efficacy of synovectomy and total knee replacement in treating patients with diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis was satisfactory.

Pexidartinib Long-Term Hepatic Safety Profile in Patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors

Background

Pexidartinib is approved in the U.S. for tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs). Herein, we assessed the hepatic safety profile of pexidartinib across patients with TGCTs receiving pexidartinib.

Materials, and Methods

Hepatic adverse reactions (ARs) were assessed by type and magnitude of liver test abnormalities, classified as (a) isolated aminotransferase elevations (alanine [ALT] or aspartate [AST], without significant alkaline phosphatase [ALP] or bilirubin elevations), or (b) mixed or cholestatic hepatotoxicity (increase in ALP with or without ALT/AST and bilirubin elevations, based on adjudication). Median follow‐up from initial pexidartinib treatment was 39 months (range, 32–82) in 140 patients with TGCTs across clinical studies NCT01004861, NCT02371369, NCT02734433, and NCT03291288.

Results

In total, 95% of patients with TGCTs (133/140) treated with pexidartinib (median duration of exposure, 19 months [range, 1–76]), experienced a hepatic AR. A total of 128 patients (91%) had reversible, low‐grade dose‐dependent isolated AST/ALT elevations without significant ALP elevations. Five patients (4%) experienced serious mixed or cholestatic injury. No case met Hy's law criteria. Onset of hepatic ARs was predominantly in the first 2 months. All five serious hepatic AR cases recovered 1–7 months following pexidartinib discontinuation. Five patients from the non‐TGCT population (N = 658) experienced serious hepatic ARs, two irreversible cases.

Conclusion

This pooled analysis provides information to help form the basis for the treating physician's risk assessment for patients with TCGTs, a locally aggressive but typically nonmetastatic tumor. In particular, long‐term treatment with pexidartinib has a predictable effect on hepatic aminotransferases and unpredictable risk of serious cholestatic or mixed liver injury.

Implications for Practice

This is the first long‐term pooled analysis to report on the long‐term hepatic safety of pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. These findings extend beyond what has been previously published, describing the observed instances of hepatic toxicity following pexidartinib treatment across the clinical development program. This information is highly relevant for medical oncologists and orthopedic oncologists and provides guidance for its proper use for appropriate patients within the Pexidartinib Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Safety program.

Pexidartinib is approved in the U.S. for treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT). This article assesses the hepatic safety profile of pexidartinib in TGCT cases and describes risk mitigation procedures designed to identify any instances of serious liver injury as early as possible to better inform prescribers and patients about this drug.

Long-term outcomes of pexidartinib in tenosynovial giant cell tumors

Background

The objective of this study was to report on the long‐term effects of pexidartinib on tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT).

Methods

This was a pooled analysis encompassing 3 pexidartinib‐treated TGCT cohorts: 1) a phase 1 extension study (NCT01004861; 1000 mg/d; n = 39), 2) ENLIVEN patients randomized to pexidartinib (1000 mg/d for 2 weeks and then 800 mg/d; n = 61), and 3) ENLIVEN crossover patients (NCT02371369; 800 mg/d; n = 30). Eligible patients were 18 years old or older and had a histologically confirmed TGCT that was unresectable and symptomatic. Efficacy endpoints included the best overall response (complete or partial response) and the duration of response (DOR) by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and the tumor volume score (TVS). The safety assessment included the frequency of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and hepatic laboratory abnormalities (aminotransferase elevations and mixed/cholestatic hepatotoxicity). The data cutoff was May 31, 2019.

Results

One hundred thirty patients with TGCT received pexidartinib (median treatment duration, 19 months; range, 1 to 76+ months); 54 (42%) remained on treatment at the end of the analysis (26 months after initial data cut of March 2017). The RECIST overall response rate (ORR) was 60%; the TVS ORR was 65%. The median times to response were 3.4 (RECIST) and 2.8 months (TVS), with 48 of the responding patients (62%) achieving a RECIST partial response by 6 months and with 72 (92%) doing so by 18 months. The median DOR was reached for TVS (46.8 months). Reported TEAEs were mostly low‐grade, with hair color changes being most frequent (75%). Most liver abnormalities (92%) were aminotransferase elevations; 4 patients (3%) experienced mixed/cholestatic hepatotoxicity (all within the first 2 months of treatment), which was reversible in all cases (recovery spanned 1‐7 months).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the prolonged efficacy and tolerability of long‐term pexidartinib treatment for TGCT.

This analysis further illustrates that systemic therapy targeting the CSF1/CSF1R pathway is an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Because of the limited availability of long‐term prospective data for tenosynovial giant cell tumor, these findings are encouraging and demonstrate the overall long‐term benefit of continued treatment with pexidartinib.

Management of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: A Neoplastic and Inflammatory Disease

Background:

Patients with diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) face a high risk of recurrence, progression, and disability. This systematic review assesses the recent evidence of surgical, adjuvant, and systemic treatments for TGCT.

Methods:

We searched PubMed and Ovid with the terms “Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath” OR “pigmented villonodular synovitis” OR “tenosynovial giant cell” AND “treatment” OR “surgery.” Inclusion criteria: published 2013 to present; prospective or retrospective design; English language; > 20 patients with histopathological confirmed diagnosis of TGCT; and ≥ 1 efficacy and/or safety outcome from surgery, systemic drug therapy, or adjuvant ⁹⁰yttrium radiosynoviorthesis.

Results:

Of the 434 studies identified, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Of 11 studies in patients with disease in the knee, nine examined surgical treatment approaches, and two evaluated adjuvant ⁹⁰yttrium radiosynoviorthesis. Of 11 studies in patients with mixed sites of disease, six assessed surgical treatment approaches, and five evaluated systemic drug therapies. Three studies assessed surgery in patients with TGCT in the hand, hip, and ankle or foot.

Discussion:

The high rates of recurrence and risks associated with surgery emphasize the need for novel treatments in patients with symptomatic, advanced TGCT. Systemic therapy may be valuable as part of a multidisciplinary approach.

Long-term clinical activity, safety and patient-reported quality of life for emactuzumab-treated patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the safety, clinical activity and patient-reported outcomes of patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour (dTGCT) of the soft tissue who were treated with emactuzumab, a humanised anti-colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) monoclonal antibody and were followed up for up to 2 years after the start of treatment.

METHODS

In this open-label phase 1 study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT01494688), patients received intravenous (IV) emactuzumab from 900 to 2000 mg every two weeks in the dose-escalation phase and at the optimal biological dose of 1000 mg with different schedules in the dose-expansion phase. Adverse event (AE) rates and biomarker assessments from tumour biopsies were analysed. Quality of life was assessed using a standard questionnaire (EuroQol-5D-3L) and the WOMAC® 3.1 Osteoarthritis Index. Tumour responses were determined with magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Altogether, 63 patients were enrolled into the study. The most frequently reported AEs were pruritus, asthenia and oedema. In 36 patients for whom biopsy tissue was available a substantial decrease of CSF1R-positive and CD68/CD163-positive macrophages was detected. The independently reviewed best overall objective response rate (ORR) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) was 71%. Responses were durable, and an ORR of 70% and 64% was determined after one or two years after enrolment into the study. Clinical activity was accompanied by an improvement in EuroQol-5D-3L and particularly the joint disorder-specific WOMAC score.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy of dTGCT patients with emactuzumab resulted in pronounced and durable responses associated with symptomatic improvement and a manageable safety profile.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor in the Hand: Experience with 173 Cases

Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) is the second most common benign tumor of the hand. Even though it is a benign lesion there is still a high incidence of local recurrence (range, 7%-44%) according to data in published papers. In this study, the clinical and epidemiological features of 173 patients who underwent excision of localized TSGCT, the recurrence rates and possible reasons for recurrence were examined in the light of current literature. Methods: Medical records of 173 patients with TSGCT were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics as well as clinical and intraoperative findings were collected. Patients were asked about the recurrence of the TSGCT and the QuickDASH scoring was applied at the final clinical evaluation after mean follow-up of 81 months. Results: Females were predominantly involved (73%). Patients aged mean 44 years at the time of surgery. There were 93 tumors in flexor zones and 80 tumors in extensor zones of the hand. Of the tumors with flexor zone localization, zone II was most predominantly involved with 46 tumors, and 18 of these were on the index finger. The extensor zones III and IV were mostly involved with 9 tumors each on the middle and ring fingers. A total of 12 recurrences (6.9 %) were determined over the mean follow-up period of 81 months. Conclusions: The characteristics of our patients identified were similar to the previous studies. Surgical excision provides good outcomes in the treatment of TSGCT especially when clear margins are obtained.

Multiple systemic treatment options in a patient with malignant tenosynovial giant cell tumour

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a group of rare soft tissues neoplasia affecting synovial joints, bursae and tendon sheaths and is classified as localized type or diffuse type. The diffuse type (TGCT-D), also known as ‘pigmented villonodular (teno)synovitis’ is characterized by local aggressivity, with invasion and destruction of adjacent soft-tissue structures, and high local recurrence rate. Radical surgery remains the standard therapy while adjuvant radiotherapy may help to control local spread. Malignant TGCT is characterized by high rate of local recurrences and distant metastasis. Few cases of malignant TGCT and very few evidences on systemic therapies are described in the literature, so, to date, no systemic treatment is approved for this rare disease. We report the case of a malignant TGCT patient treated with many different systemic therapies, including chemotherapy and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, and performed a review of the literature on the systemic treatment options of this rare tumour.

Incomplete resection increases the risk of local recurrence and negatively affects functional outcome in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the hindfoot

BACKGROUND

Diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) are more likely to occur in the hindfoot and tend to recur after surgical excision. We performed a pooled analysis of hindfoot TGCT cases to identify factors associated with local recurrence and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 33 patients diagnosed with TGCT (15, localized cases; 18 diffused cases) of the hindfoot between 1998 and 2017. Median follow-up was 32 months. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to estimate the hazard ratios for risk factors for local failure. Generalized linear regression models were used to assess whether resection status, tumor size, tumor type or bone involvement correlated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.

RESULTS

Local failure was reported in 30% (10/33) patients. Multivariable analysis showed that macroscopically incomplete resection was the only independent prognostic factor for poor local failure-free survival (P=.001). Incomplete resection significantly decreased MSTS score and negatively affected functional outcome (P=.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete resection increases the risk of local recurrence and negatively affects functional outcome in patients with TGCT of the hindfoot.

Cadherin-11 cooperates with inflammatory factors to promote the migration and invasion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in pigmented villonodular synovitis

Rationale: Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a destructive benign tumor-like hyperplastic disease that occurs in synovial tissue. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) are the predominant cell type comprising the structure of the PVNS synovial lining layer. Due to a high recurrence rate, high invasion, migration, and cartilage destruction ability, PVNS causes substantial damage to patients and the efficacy of surgical resection is not satisfactory. Therefore, exploring the pathogenesis and identifying novel therapeutic targets for PVNS are urgently required. Currently, the pathogenesis of PVNS remains unclear, and there is uncertainty and controversy regarding whether PVNS is an inflammatory or a neoplastic disease. Cadherin-11 is a classical molecule that mediates hemophilic cell-to-cell adhesion in FLS and plays an important role in the normal synovium lining layer formation. This study aimed to explore the role of inflammation and cadherin-11 in PVNS pathogenesis and determine the effects of cadherin-11 as a molecular target for PVNS treatment.

Methods: FLS were primarily cultured from PVNS patients during arthroscopic synovectomy. The level of cytokines in the PVNS synovial fluid was evaluated using a human antibody array. Cadherin-11 expression of PVNS FLS was detected by qPCR, Western blots, tissue immunohistochemistry, and cell immunofluorescence. Cadherin-11 was down-regulated by siRNA or up-regulated with a plasmid, with or without inflammatory factor stimulation, and PI3K/Akt was inhibited with LY294002. The capacity of migration and invasion of PVNS FLS was tested using Transwell and wound-healing assays. Activation of the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways was detected by Western blots. Chondrocyte damage by PVNS FLS was assessed with a co-culture assay.

Results: Inflammatory factors (IL-1β and TNF-α) in the synovial fluid of PVNS patients were significantly up-regulated. Cadherin-11 was highly expressed in the FLS of PVNS patients, and positively correlated with recurrence, extra-articular migration, and cartilage destruction of PVNS. Knocking down of cadherin-11 inhibited the migration and invasion of PVNS FLS. Moreover, inflammatory factors up-regulated the expression of cadherin-11, which activated the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways and led to cartilage destruction. Inhibition of cadherin-11 blocked IL-1β- and TNF-α-induced activation of the above pathways, migration and invasion of PVNS FLS, and damage of chondrocyte. In addition, the elevation of cadherin-11 expression, together with the migration and invasion, of PVNS FLS was down-regulated by the inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Conclusions: Cadherin-11 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PVNS and forms a positive feedback loop with inflammatory factors, which further activates the NF-κB and MAPK pathways to trigger an inflammatory cascade. Cadherin-11-mediated inflammation results in PVNS with high recurrence, invasiveness, and strong cartilage destruction ability, and eventually promotes the transformation of PVNS from the initial inflammatory disease to neoplastic disease. Thus, inhibition of cadherin-11 together with its related inflammatory reaction, represents a new therapeutic strategy for PVNS.