Role of tumour-free margin distance for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer-a subset analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie CaRE-1 multicenter study

Surgical Margins After Neoadjuvant Radiation for Locally Advanced Vulvar Carcinoma: What is an Adequate Margin?

OBJECTIVE

We aim to explore whether the surgical tumor free margin is important for overall survival (OS) and local control in patients who undergo neoadjuvant radiation (RT) for vulvar cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review from 2004 to 2021 of patients who underwent RT followed by surgical resection was performed. Patients were categorized into groups based on margin status (no residual disease, >8 mm, close margins defined as 1 to 7 mm, or positive). Local control and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier with log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with cox hazards model.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included. A complete pathologic response (pCR) was found in 56% (n=46) of patients. The median follow-up time was 35 months (range: 4 to 216). The median OS for the entire cohort was 46 months (95% CI: 32.3-59.7). Having a pCR improved both OS and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with residual disease by 81 and 91 months, respectively (P<0.001). In the 2 patients with a margin >8 mm, there was no statistical difference in survival between those with close margins (46 vs. 25 mo, P=0.485). Factors that significantly impacted both OS and DFS were depth of invasion (DOI) and LVSI. On multivariate analysis of those with residual disease, there was no difference in OS or DFS by margin status but having a DOI >9 mm showed decreased OS (HR: 3.654; 95% CI: 1.317-10.135).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, response to RT, not margin status drives survival and recurrence. Given residual disease, the optimal margin is not clear, as there were only 2 patients with >8 mm margins. A close or positive margin had no impact on OS or local recurrence. A DOI >9 mm significantly impacts both OS and local recurrence even when accounting for other factors.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Groin Node Metastases Following Surgery for Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background: Lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer is a critical prognostic factor associated with higher recurrence and decreased survival. A survival benefit is reported with adjuvant radiotherapy but with potential significant morbidity. We aim to clarify whether there is high-quality evidence to support the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in this setting. Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy to locoregional metastatic nodal areas. Search Methods: We conducted a comprehensive and systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Cancer Institute. We considered only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main Results: We identified 1,760 records and finally retrieved only one eligible RCT (114 participants with positive inguinofemoral lymph nodes). All women had undergone radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and had been randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy or to intraoperative ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. At 6 years, the overall survival (OS) was 51% versus 41% in favor of radiotherapy (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.30-1.3) without significance and with very low certainty of evidence. At 6 year, the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 29% versus 51% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.87). Recurrence-free survival at 6 years was 59% after adjuvant radiotherapy versus 48% after pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). Three (5.3%) versus 13 (24.1%) groin recurrences were noted, respectively, in the adjuvant radiotherapy and pelvic lymphadenectomy groups. There was no significant difference in acute toxicities for pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to radiotherapy. In women with positive pelvic lymph nodes (20%), the OS at 6 year was 36% compared with 13% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Late cutaneous toxicity rate appeared to be greater after radiotherapy (19% vs. 15%) but with less chronic lymphedema (16% vs. 22%). Conclusion: There is only very low-quality evidence on administering adjuvant radiotherapy for inguinal lymph node metastases. Although the identified study was a multicenter RCT, there was a reasonable imprecision and inconsistency because of small study numbers, wide confidence intervals in the data, and early trial closure, resulting in downgrading of the evidence.

A review of prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Evidence from the last decade

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare gynecologic cancer that is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, particularly for recurrent disease. This review summarizes the evidence and continued challenges, regarding the traditional clinicopathologic factors used to prognosticate vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Articles published within the last 10 years (2010-2020) were identified. Relevant articles concerning the following fifteen prognostic factors were reviewed: HPV/p16 status, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, stromal changes, histologic patterns of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, tumour focality, margin status and lichen sclerosus (LS). The relationship between each prognostic factor and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were extracted.

Current status of vulvar cancer in Japan: analysis of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group nationwide survey study

This review provides an overview of the current status of vulvar cancer in Japan, focusing specifically on the findings from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group nationwide survey study. The author offers a comprehensive summary of the current status of vulvar cancer in Japan, along with an exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. Notably, the review highlights the concerning upward trend of vulvar cancer in older age groups and advanced stages in Japan. The author concludes that addressing these challenges may require the centralization of resources and expertise. By bridging knowledge gaps and identifying areas for improvement, this review contributes to enhancing the understanding and management of vulvar cancer in Japan.

Lymph Node Metastasis and Patterns of Recurrence in Vulvar Carcinoma: 10 Years' Single Center Experience

Vulvar carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy and there is a paucity of data, especially from India and other developing countries regarding the prognostic factors impacting recurrence and survival. A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Gynecologic Oncology at a tertiary care, regional cancer institute, including all patients with carcinoma vulva who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2018. Demographic profile, surgical-pathological information, details of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, and peri-operative complications were analyzed. Long-term follow-up data was gathered, with an evaluation of various prognostic factors impacting recurrence and overall survival outcome. Forty-five cases with mean age of 56.2 years (range 29-82) were treated during the study period. Surgery was the initial treatment modality in 41 (91.1%) cases. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery was given to four cases. After complete surgico-pathological staging, most patients had stage I disease (26 cases, 57.8%) and 22.2% had stage II disease. Owing to microscopic lymph node involvement, seven cases (15.6%) belonged to FIGO stage III disease. Two cases had stage IVA disease with fixed groin nodes. Adjuvant chemotherapy in the form of 5-fluoro uracil and cisplatin was administered to four out of the nine patients with nodal involvement. The remaining five were advised adjuvant groin radiation. At a median follow-up of 34 months (range 2-114 months), 12 cases (26.7%) experienced a recurrence and one case with stage IVA disease progressed during adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival was 76.6% and the 5-year disease-free survival was 69.6%. There were a total number of 10 deaths, of which seven were due to disease recurrence or progression and the remaining 30% of deaths were due to medical co-morbid conditions. Overall survival was negatively impacted by increasing age (age > 60 years), number of positive nodes, presence of perinodal spread, and stage of the disease. Recurrence-free survival was significantly reduced in those with the presence of peri-nodal spread and lympho-vascular space invasion. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was found to be higher in patients with age > 60 years, increasing tumor size, presence of lympho-vascular space invasion and the number of lymph nodes removed. In carcinoma vulva, treatment should be individualized with multidisciplinary cooperation. In our series, we found that the stage of disease, nodal positivity, and nodal positivity with extra-capsular spread were significant prognostic factors impacting survival on analysis. Lymph nodal positivity was associated with increasing tumour size, presence of lympho-vascular invasion, and patient age.

Tumor-Free Resection Margin Distance in the Surgical Treatment of Node-Negative Squamous Cell Cancer of the Vulva Has No Impact on Survival: Analysis of a Large Patient Cohort in a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pathological tumor-free margin distance on survival in SCC patients treated with surgery alone.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 128 patients with node-negative disease that received no adjuvant treatment. Disease-free and overall survival were analyzed according to pathological tumor-free margin distance.

RESULTS

The patients were subclassified into three resection margin category groups: "1 to 3 mm" (n = 42), ">3 to 8 mm" (n = 47) or ">8 mm" (n = 39). Thirty-nine of the 128 patients (30.5%) developed recurrent disease. Median follow-up for disease-free survival (DFS) was 6.49 years (95% CI 5.16 years; 7.62 years), and median follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 6.29 years (95% CI 5.45 years; 7.33 years). The 5-year DFS rate was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.79), and the 5-year OS rate was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.87). Regarding the survival outcome, there were no independent significant differences in either disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.300) or overall survival (p = 1.000) among patients within the three tumor-free resection margin categories. Multivariate analyses did not show any statistically significant association between tumor-free resection margin distance and recurrent disease or death, either when analyzed as a categorical variable or when analyzed as a continuous variable.

CONCLUSION

The present study did not show a significant impact of pathological tumor-free resection margin distance following surgery in patients with node-negative SCC of the vulva (that did not receive adjuvant treatment) on disease-free and overall survival.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023

BACKGROUND

As part of its mission to improve the quality of care for women with gynecological cancers across Europe, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) first published in 2017 evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To update the ESGO guidelines based on the new evidence addressing the management of vulvar cancer and to cover new topics in order to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment of vulvar cancer.

METHODS

The ESGO Council nominated an international development group comprised of practicing clinicians who provide care to vulvar cancer patients and have demonstrated leadership through their expertize in clinical care and research, national and international engagement and profile as well as dedication to the topics addressed to serve on the expert panel (18 experts across Europe). To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, new data identified from a systematic search were reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 206 international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

RESULTS

The updated guidelines cover comprehensively diagnosis and referral, staging, pathology, pre-operative investigations, surgical management (local treatment, groin treatment, sentinel lymph node procedure, reconstructive surgery), (chemo)radiotherapy, systemic treatment, treatment of recurrent disease (vulvar, inguinal, pelvic, and distant recurrences), and follow-up. Management algorithms are also defined.

The intratumour microbiota and neutrophilic inflammation in squamous cell vulvar carcinoma microenvironment

BACKGROUND

A causal link between microbiota composition (dysbiosis) and oncogenesis has been demonstrated for several types of cancer. Neutrophils play a role in both immune protection against bacterial threats and carcinogenesis. This study aimed to characterise intratumoral bacteria in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and their putative effect on neutrophil recruitment and cancer progression.

METHODS

Clinical material was obtained from 89 patients with VSCC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 16S rRNA and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were used to detect bacterial species in VSCC. To verify neutrophil activation, CD66b expression in tumour specimens was analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Subsequently, IHC was applied to detect the main neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs), cathepsin G (CTSG), neutrophil elastase (ELANE), and proteinase 3 (PRTN3) in VSCC.

RESULTS

Fusobacterium nucleatum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified as tumour-promoting bacteria, and their presence was found to be associated with a shorter time to progression in VSCC patients. Furthermore, high abundance of CD66b, the neutrophil activation marker, in VSCC samples, was found to relate to poor survival of patients with VSCC. The selected NSPs were shown to be expressed in vulvar tumours, also within microabscess. The increased numbers of microabscesess were correlated with poor survival in VSCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that neutrophilic inflammation seem to be permissive for tumour-promoting bacteria growth in VSCC. The findings provide new therapeutic opportunities, such as based on shifting the balance of neutrophil populations to those with antitumorigenic activity and on targeting NSPs produced by activated neutrophils at the inflammation sites.

Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 1: clinical recommendations

PURPOSE

The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). Given the lack of prospective data on the management of vulvar carcinoma, this document provides an up-to-date review of radiotherapy treatment in vulvar cancer and a series of consensus-based recommendations from a group of experts.

METHODS

A two-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus treatment recommendations in three clinical settings: 1) adjuvant treatment, 2) locally-advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC), and 3) recurrent disease. After the first round, we comprehensively reviewed the available medical literature from peer-reviewed journals to assess and define the evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree.

RESULTS

The main recommendations were as follows: 1) following surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended with the presence of adverse risk factors (primarily positive margins and lymph node involvement); 2) radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) should be considered in LAVC; and 3) in recurrent disease, radiotherapy should be individualised on a case-by-case basis. A high level of agreement over 80% was reached.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of robust clinical data, these final recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.

Data Set for the Reporting of Carcinomas of the Vulva: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

A cogent and comprehensive pathologic report is essential for optimal patient management, cancer staging, and prognostication. This article details the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) process and the development of the vulval carcinoma reporting data set. It describes the "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in pathology reports for vulval carcinoma, inclusive of clinical, macroscopic, microscopic, and ancillary testing considerations. It provides definitions and commentary for the evidence and/or consensus-based deliberations for each element included in the data set. The commentary also discusses controversial issues, such as p16/human papillomavirus testing, tumor grading and measurements, as well as elements that show promise and warrant further evidence-based study. A summary and discussion of the updated vulval cancer staging system by the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FIGO) in 2021 is also provided. We hope the widespread implementation of this data set will facilitate consistent and accurate reporting, data collection, comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations, facilitate research, and serve as a platform to improve patient outcomes.

Management of Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer

Simple Summary

Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological malignancy that affects mainly postmenopausal women. Recently, however, an alarming increase in the rates among young women has been observed due to human papillomavirus infection. The standard treatment for vulvar cancer is surgery with or without radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment. In recent decades, sentinel lymph node biopsy has been included as part of the surgical treatment. Thus, our objective was to review and discuss the advances found in the literature about early-stage vulvar cancer. For this, we searched PubMed for publications in the English language. Relevant articles, such as the GROINS-V studies, and the GOG protocols, are presented in this review exhibiting the evolution of early-stage vulvar cancer treatment and the decrease in surgical morbidity rates.

Abstract

Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological malignancy since it represents 4% of all cancers of the female genital tract. The most common histological type is squamous cell carcinoma (90%). This type can be classified into two clinicopathological subtypes according to the etiology. The first subtype is associated with persistent human papillomavirus infection and is usually diagnosed in younger women. The second subtype is associated with lichen sclerosus condition, and in most cases is diagnosed in postmenopausal women. Currently, an increase in first subtype cases has been observed, which raised the concern about associated mortality and treatment morbidity among young women. Vulvar cancer treatment depends on histopathology grade and staging, but surgery with or without radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment is considered the gold standard. In recent decades, sentinel lymph node biopsy has been incorporated as part of the treatment. Therefore, we sought to review and discuss the advances documented in the literature about vulvar cancer focusing on the treatment of early-stage disease. Relevant articles, such as the GROINS-V studies and the GOG protocols, are presented in this review. Additionally, we discuss key points such as the evolution of treatment from invasive surgery with high morbidity, to more conservative approaches without compromising oncologic safety; the role of sentinel lymph node mapping in the initial staging, since it reduces the complications caused by inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy; the recurrences rates, since local recurrence is common and curable, however, groin-associated, or distant recurrences have a poor prognosis; and, finally, the long-term follow-up that is essential for all patients.

Reconstructive Surgery versus Primary Closure following Vulvar Cancer Excision: A Wide Single-Center Experience

Simple Summary

When it comes to advanced vulval cancer management, there is a critical quandary to consider. This is owing to the severe negative impact of demolitive surgery on women who are afflicted by both functional and psychological consequences of the procedure. Primary closure of vulvar and/or perineal defects can be accomplished without difficulty in many situations, but this is accompanied by tension of the skin closure and distortion of the anatomy. In these circumstances, reconstructive surgery will be required to restore the anatomical and functional characteristics of the vulva. In this paper, we share our substantial expertise of primary closure versus reconstruction after demolitive surgery of advanced vulvar cancer, and we discuss our findings in light of the literature.

Abstract

(1) Background: plastic reconstruction in vulvar surgery can lead to a better treatment outcome than primary closure. This study aims to compare the preoperative parameters (co-morbidities and tumor size) and postoperative results (tumor free margins and wound healing) between the primary closure and reconstructive surgery after vulvar cancer surgery; (2) Methods: this is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2009 to 2021 at a tertiary cancer institution; (3) Results: 177 patients were included in the final analysis (51 patients had primary closure PC and 126 had reconstructive surgery RS). About half (49%) of the PC patients had no co-morbidities (p = 0.043). The RS group had a 45 mm median maximal tumor diameter compared to the PC group’s 23 mm (p = 0.013). More than 90% of RS and 80% of PC had tumor-free margins (p = 0.1). Both groups had anterior vulvar excision as the most common surgery (52.4% RS vs. 23.5% PC; p = 0.001). Both groups had identical rates of wound healing disorders. In a median follow-up of 39 months; recurrent disease was found in 23.5% of PC vs. 10.3% in RS (p = 0.012). In terms of overall survival there was no significant difference between the both groups; (4) Conclusions: reconstructive vulvar surgery enables enhanced complete resection rates of larger vulvar tumors with better anatomical restoration and a comparable wound recovery in comparison to primary closure. This results in a lower recurrence rate despite the increased tumor volume.

Postoperative management of vulvar cancer

The primary treatment for resectable vulvar cancer includes wide local excision of the primary tumor and surgical lymph node assessment. Following surgery, up to 40–50% of patients develop a local recurrence. Historically, the strongest predictor of local recurrence is a positive or close margin (defined as <8 mm), although recent studies question the importance of margin status. Post-operative radiotherapy to the vulva is recommended for all women with a positive margin where re-excision is not possible. Radiotherapy may also be considered in the setting of risk factors for local recurrence: close margin, lymphovascular invasion, large tumor size, and/or depth of invasion >5 mm. Nodal assessment is an important component of vulvar cancer management. A negative sentinel node is associated with a low false-negative predictive value (2% in patients with vulvar tumor <4 cm in GOG 173), 2-year groin recurrence rate of 2.3%, and 3-year disease-specific survival rate of 97% in patients with unifocal vulvar tumor <4 cm in the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar Cancer (GROINSS-V I) study. Thus, patients with tumor size <4 cm (without additional local risk factors) and negative sentinel node can be observed. Patients with sentinel node metastasis ≤2 mm can be treated with post-operative radiotherapy (2-year isolated groin recurrence rate of 1.6% in GROINSS-V II), as a safe alternative to lymphadenectomy. Patients with sentinel node metastasis >2 mm following sentinel node biopsy should undergo inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by post-operative radiotherapy—based on the GROINSS-V II study, the 2-year isolated groin recurrence rate remains unacceptably high (22%) with radiotherapy alone. Retrospective studies suggest that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy may improve survival. The ongoing GROINSS-V III study is investigating concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy dose escalation. The main goal of these post-operative treatments is to reduce the risk of local, and especially groin, recurrences, which are almost universally fatal.

Developing and Validating Novel Nomograms for Predicting the Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Primary Vulvar Squamous Cell Cancer

Background: To develop and validate novel nomograms for better predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC).

Methods: A retrospective analysis using a population-based database between 2004 and 2016 was carried. A 10-fold cross-validation with 200 repetitions was used to choose the best fit multivariate Cox model based on the net-benefit of decision curve analysis. Net-benefit, Harrell's C concordance statistic (C-statistic) of calibration plot, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the model prediction accuracy. Nomograms of the OS and CSS were generated based on the best fit model.

Results: Of the 6,792 patients with VSCC, 5,094 (75%) and 1,698 (25%) were allocated to the training and validation cohort, respectively. All the variables were balanced between the training and validation cohorts. Age, insurance, tumor size, pathological grade, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, invasion depth, lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph nodes biopsy, surgery, N stage, and M stage were in the best fit model for generating nomograms. The decision curve analysis, calibration plot, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve show the better prediction performance of the model compared to previous studies. The C-statistics of our model for OS prediction are 0.80, 0.83, and 0.81 in the training, validation, and overall cohorts, respectively, while for CSS prediction are 0.83, 0.85, and 0.84. The AUCs for 3- and 5-year OS are the same and are 0.81, 0.83, and 0.81 in the training, validation, and overall cohorts, respectively. The AUCs for 3- and 5-year CSS are 0.78 and 0.80, 0.79 and 0.80, and 0.79 and 0.80 in those three cohorts.

Conclusions: Our model shows the best prediction accuracy of the OS and CSS for patients with vulvar cancer (VC), which is of significant clinical practice value.

Adjuvant radiotherapy and local recurrence in vulvar cancer - a subset analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 study

BACKGROUND

The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) to the vulva with regard to prognosis and local recurrence in patients with vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC) is poorly described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the AGO-CaRE-1 study 1618 patients with primary VSCC FIGO stage ≥ IB, treated between 1998-2008, were documented. In this retrospective subanalysis, 360 patients were included based on the following criteria: nodal involvement (pN+), known RT treatment and known radiation fields.

RESULTS

The majority had pT1b/pT2 tumors (n=299; 83.1%). In 76.7%, R0 resection was achieved. 57/360 (15.8%) N+ patients were treated with adjuvant RT to the groins/pelvis and 146/360 (40.5%) received adjuvant RT to the vulva and groins/pelvis. 157/360 (43.6%) patients did not receive any adjuvant RT. HPV status was available in 162/360 patients (45.0%), 75/162 tumors were HPV+(46.3%), 87/162 (53.7%) HPV-. During a median follow-up of 17.2 months, recurrence at the vulva only occurred in 25.5% of patients without adjuvant RT, in 22.8% of patients with adjuvant RT to groins/pelvis and in 15.8% of patients with adjuvant RT to the vulva and groins/pelvis respectively. The risk reducing effect of local RT was independent of the resection margin status. 50% disease free survival time (50% DFST) indicated a stronger impact of adjuvant RT to the vulva in HPV+ compared to HPV- patients (50% DFST 20.7 months vs. 17.8 months).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant RT to the vulva was associated with a lower risk for local recurrence in N+ VSCC independent of the resection margin status. This observation was more pronounced in patients with HPV+ tumors in comparison to HPV- tumors.

Role of adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in gynaecological cancer

Adjuvant and post-operative therapy aimed at reducing the risk of disease recurrence and improving potential for cure can be broadly categorised into systemic and locoregional treatment. For epithelial ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay management. Maintenance therapy with PARPi is a state-of-the-art option for women with advanced disease following complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, particularly those with BRCA mutations. Adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer depends mostly on FIGO staging and histopathological risk factors. For cervical cancer, adjuvant chemoradiation is indicated after surgery in women with close or positive resection margins and positive nodes. Generally, recommendations for adjuvant therapy should be individualised and reviewed at the multidisciplinary tumour board meeting, and the decision for adjuvant therapy should be balanced with treatment toxicity. The overview of the role of adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in gynaecological cancers will be discussed in this chapter.

Lichen Sclerosis is Associated With a High Rate of Local Failure After Radio(chemo)therapy for Vulvar Cancer

AIMS

Radio(chemo)therapy plays an important role in the treatment of vulvar cancer, either as postoperative treatment or as definitive treatment in patients who present with inoperable disease. Only limited data are available regarding outcome after modern state of the art radio(chemo)therapy and more information regarding prognostic factors are warranted. The aim of this study was to evaluate disease outcomes after radio(chemo)therapy in patients with vulvar cancer with special emphasis on the impact of lichen sclerosis on local control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients (n = 109) from the western half of Denmark who were treated with definitive (n = 52) or postoperative (n = 57) radio(chemo)therapy between January 2013 and January 2020 were included. Local control, cause-specific survival and overall survival, as well as morbidity, were analysed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Prognostic factors for local control were analysed in univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 35 (4-95) months, 46 (42.0%) patients were diagnosed with recurrence. Eighty per cent of the recurrences were located to the vulva region, leading to a 5-year local control of 58.9% (confidence interval 47.9-69.9). Cause-specific survival was 62.9% (confidence interval 53.1-72.7), whereas overall survival was 58.0% (confidence interval 47.6-68.5). Grade 3-4 morbidity was diagnosed in 10 (9%) patients. Lichen sclerosis (hazard ratio 3.89; confidence interval 1.93-7.79) was an independent risk factors for local recurrence. Patients without lichen sclerosis had a 5-year local control rate of 83.6% (confidence interval 67.2-99.0) and 62.6% (confidence interval 43.2-82.0) after postoperative and definitive radio(chemo)therapy, respectively. In patients with lichen sclerosis, the local control rate was 44.0% (confidence interval 19.3-69.0) and 17.6% (confidence interval 0-30.0) after postoperative and definitive radio(chemo)therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radio(chemo)therapy plays an important role in the treatment of vulvar cancer. However, despite dose escalation, a substantial proportion of patients experienced local relapse. Pre-existing lichen sclerosis seems to have a significant impact on the risk of recurrence. This should influence surveillance programmes for these patients.

Positive surgical margin is an independent predictor of overall survival of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

AIM

It is uncertain whether curative surgical treatment or a less radical surgery with adjuvant treatment should be provided to preserve function in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that is adjacent to the urethra, anus, and vagina. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical margin in patients with vulvar SCC with regard to local recurrence and overall survival.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients were identified as having a diagnosis of vulvar SCC without distant metastasis. They had been treated surgically with curative intent at the Cancer Institute Hospital. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Rates of 5-year local recurrence-free survival among patients with positive, <3-mm, <5-mm, <8-mm, and ≥8-mm surgical margins were 32%, 30.3%, 42.5%, 55.5%, and 73%, respectively. Rates of 5-year overall survival of patients with positive, <3-mm, <5-mm, <8-mm, and ≥8-mm surgical margins were 15.5%, 53.8%, 58.8%, 67.6%, and 83.3%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, a tumor size of more than 2-cm (hazard ratio [HR] = 17.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39-226) and a positive surgical margin (HR = 0.0092, 95% CI = 0.011-0.53) were risk factors for local recurrence, and a lymph node involvement (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.31-6.43) and a positive surgical margin (HR = 0.0046, 95% CI = 0.011-0.53) were significant risk factors for overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the prognosis, thorough resection with an adequate surgical margin is needed. But narrow surgical margin may be acceptable, particularly to preserve the function of adjacent organs.

Safety and Benefit Of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Biopsy Compared to Regional Lymph Node Dissection in Primary Vulvar Cancer Patients Without Distant Metastasis and Adjacent Organ Invasion: A Retrospective Population Study

Background

The safety and benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) compared with regional lymph node dissection (RLND) and no lymph nodes removed (NA) in patients with vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC) was not well studied.

Methods

A retrospective analysis on VSCC patients without distant metastasis and adjacent organ invasion from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database between 2004 and 2016 was carried out. Within subgroups stratified by negative (LN−) or positive (LN+) regional lymph node findings, inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjusted multivariate Fine-Gray compete risk (CR) model and accelerated failure time (AFT) model was used to investigate the factors associated with and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of the 3,161 VSCC patients treated with surgery, 287 (9.1%) underwent SLNB, 1,716 (54.3%) underwent RLND, and 1,158 (36.6%) had no regional lymph nodes removed. As illustrated by IPW adjusted multivariate regressions, SLNB was significantly associated with prolonged CSS (LN−, adjusted sub-proportional hazard ratio [sHR] = 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19–0.93; P=0.032; LN+, adjusted sHR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.54, P<0.001) and OS (LN−, adjusted time ratio [TR] = 1.38; 95% CI, 0.82–2.32; P=0.226; LN+, adjusted TR = 2.68; 95% CI, 1.73–4.14; P<0.001), although the effect of SLNB on OS was not significant within the LN− cohort. Moreover, SLNB led to improved CSS (adjusted sHR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23–0.70; P = 0.001) and OS (adjusted TR=1.15, 95% CI 0.76-1.73, P=0.279) compared with NA. Age was a significant prognostic factor of CSS and OS, whereas tumor size, surgery type, and invasion depth were not.

Conclusions

SLNB leads to significantly prolonged CSS and OS in VSCC surgery patients without distant metastasis and adjacent organ invasion than RLND, except for the similar OS in the LN− cohort. SLNB could be carried out preferentially for VSCC surgery patients without distant metastasis and adjacent organ invasion, irrespective of tumor size, surgery type, invasion depth, and regional lymph nodes metastasis. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm the findings of this study.

Practical Guidance for Measuring and Reporting Surgical Margins in Vulvar Cancer

Surgical resection with free surgical margins is the cornerstone of successful primary treatment of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). In general reexcision is recommended when the minimum peripheral surgical margin (MPSM) is <8 mm microscopically. Pathologists are, therefore, required to report the minimum distance from the tumor to the surgical margin. Currently, there are no guidelines on how to make this measurement, as this is often considered straightforward. However, during the 2018 Annual Meeting of the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP), a discussion on this topic revealed a variety of opinions with regard to reporting and method of measuring margin clearance in VSCC specimens. Given the need for uniformity and the lack of guidance in the literature, we initiated an online survey in order to deliver a consensus-based definition of peripheral surgical margins in VSCC resections. The survey included questions and representative diagrams of peripheral margin measurements. In total, 57 pathologists participated in this survey. On the basis of consensus results, we propose to define MPSM in VSCC as the minimum distance from the peripheral edge of the invasive tumor nests toward the inked peripheral surgical margin reported in millimeters. This MPSM measurement should run through tissue and preferably be measured in a straight line. Along with MPSM, other relevant measurements such as depth of invasion or tumor thickness and distance to deep margins should be reported. This manuscript provides guidance to the practicing pathologist in measuring MPSM in VSCC resection specimens, in order to promote uniformity in measuring and reporting.

New treatment standards for vulvar cancer 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent advances regarding molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), a rare but continuously rising disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical research focuses on deescalation especially with regard to surgery. Recurrence patterns have been analyzed to further understand the course of disease showing a persistent risk for local recurrence even several years after the initial diagnosis. The main focuses of recent translational research are the distinct molecular mechanisms behind human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and -negative VSCC. Next-generation sequencing analyses have highlighted TP53 as central driver mutation in HPV-negative disease. For HPV-independent VSCC, an impaired prognosis with limited disease-free and overall survival has been reported from a large multicenter analysis. Although no targeted agent has been granted approval, the impact of immunotherapy in vulvar cancer has been investigated in basket trials. Therapy response, however, was limited.

SUMMARY

Further clinical research should focus on deciphering the molecular mechanisms of tumor development further. Detailed understanding of the molecular landscape will help to find novel therapy targets, fight the disease in advanced stages and thereby improve the quality of life for affected patients.

Raman spectroscopy for guidance of vulvar cancer surgery: a pilot study

For vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), the mainstay of treatment is surgical removal with tumour-free margins. Surgeons still operate without objective tools that provide margin-status. This study assesses Raman spectroscopy potentiality for distinguishing ex-vivo VSCC from healthy tissue in 11 patients. Grid-based Raman maps were obtained from processed spectra. Water content and C-H band ratio (2,910-2,966 cm^-1 / 2810-2890 cm^-1) were calculated per spectrum and used as linear discriminant parameters. Healthy tissue was differentiated from VSCC with 0.90 discriminative power, 0.79 sensitivity and 0.86 specificity.This is an important step towards the development of objective tools for VSCC surgical guidance.

Reducing the radicality of surgery for vulvar cancer: are smaller margins safer?

INTRODUCTION

Vulvar cancer accounts for ~4% of all gynecological malignancies and the majority of tumors (>90%) are squamous cell (keratinizing, ~60% and warty/basaloid, ~30%). Surgical excision forms the foundation of treatment, with resection margin status being the single most influential factor when predicting clinical outcome. There has been a paradigm shift concerning surgical approaches and radicality when managing vulvar cancer within recent times, largely owing to a desire to preserve vulvar structure and function without compromising oncological outcome. As such the safety of the size of resection margin has been called into question. In this narrative review we consider the current literature on the safety of resection margins for vulvar cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for original peer-reviewed primary and review articles, from January 2005 to January 2020. The following search terms were used vulvar cancer surgery, vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, excision margins, adjuvant radiation.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A pathological tumor margin of <8 mm has been widely considered to indicate "close" margins. This measurement after fixation of the tumor is considered comparable to a surgical resection margin of around 1cm, following an estimated 20% tissue shrinkage after formalin fixation and a 1-2cm clinical surgical margin in order to achieve the 8 mm final pathological margin.

CONCLUSIONS

A surgical resection margin of 2-3mm does not appear to be associated with a higher rate of local recurrence than the widely used limit of 8 mm. As such the traditional practice of re-excision or adjuvant radiotherapy based on "close" surgical margins alone needs to be closely evaluated, since the attendant morbidity associated with these procedures may not be outweighed by oncological benefit.

The Prognostic Role of the Surgical Margins in Squamous Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Australian Study

For the last 30 years at the Royal Hospital for Women, unifocal vulvar squamous cancers have been treated by radical local excision, aiming to achieve a histopathological margin of ≥8 mm, equating to a surgical margin of 1 cm. The need for a margin of this width has recently been challenged. We aimed to determine the long-term outcome following this conservative approach, and the relationship between vulvar recurrences and surgical margins. Data were obtained retrospectively on 345 patients treated primarily with surgery for squamous vulvar cancer between 1987 and 2017. Median follow-up was 93 months. Five-year disease-specific survival was 86%. Of 78 vulvar recurrences, 33 (42.3%) were at the primary site and 45 (57.7%) at a remote site. In multivariable analysis, a margin < 5 mm showed a higher risk of all vulvar (Hazard ratio (HR), 2.29; CI, 1.12-4.70), and primary site recurrences (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), 15.20; CI, 5.21-44.26), while those with a margin of 5 to <8 mm had a higher risk of a primary site recurrence (SHR, 8.92; CI, 3.26-24.43), and a lower risk of remote site recurrence. Excision margins < 8 mm treated by re-excision or radiation therapy had a significantly decreased risk of recurrence. Guidelines should continue to recommend a surgical margin of 1 cm.

Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma (CAP) as a New Tool for the Management of Vulva Cancer and Vulvar Premalignant Lesions in Gynaecological Oncology

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a specific form of malignancy accounting for 5–6% of all gynaecologic malignancies. Although VC occurs most commonly in women after 60 years of age, disease incidence has risen progressively in premenopausal women in recent decades. VC demonstrates particular features requiring well-adapted therapeutic approaches to avoid potential treatment-related complications. Significant improvements in disease-free survival and overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with post-stage I disease have been achieved by implementing a combination therapy consisting of radical surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Achieving local control remains challenging. However, mostly due to specific anatomical conditions, the need for comprehensive surgical reconstruction and frequent post-operative healing complications. Novel therapeutic tools better adapted to VC particularities are essential for improving individual outcomes. To this end, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment is a promising option for VC, and is particularly appropriate for the local treatment of dysplastic lesions, early intraepithelial cancer, and invasive tumours. In addition, CAP also helps reduce inflammatory complications and improve wound healing. The application of CAP may realise either directly or indirectly utilising nanoparticle technologies. CAP has demonstrated remarkable treatment benefits for several malignant conditions, and has created new medical fields, such as “plasma medicine” and “plasma oncology”. This article highlights the benefits of CAP for the treatment of VC, VC pre-stages, and postsurgical wound complications. There has not yet been a published report of CAP on vulvar cancer cells, and so this review summarises the progress made in gynaecological oncology and in other cancers, and promotes an important, understudied area for future research. The paradigm shift from reactive to predictive, preventive and personalised medical approaches in overall VC management is also considered.

A review of prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Evidence from the last decade

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare gynecologic cancer that is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, particularly for recurrent disease. This review summarizes the evidence and continued challenges, regarding the traditional clinicopathologic factors used to prognosticate vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Articles published within the last 10 years (2010-2020) were identified. Relevant articles concerning the following fifteen prognostic factors were reviewed: HPV/p16 status, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, stromal changes, histologic patterns of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, tumour focality, margin status and lichen sclerosus (LS). The relationship between each prognostic factor and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were extracted.

No. 370-Management of Squamous Cell Cancer of the Vulva

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the clinical evaluation and management of squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the vulva with respect to diagnosis, primary surgical, radiation, or chemotherapy management and need for adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Other vulvar cancer pathologic diagnoses are not included in the guideline.

INTENDED USERS

The first part of this document which includes recommendations 1 through 3 is for general gynaecologists, obstetricians, family doctors, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, residents, and health care providers with a focus on the presentation, diagnosis, and updated information about surgical procedures performed by subspecialists. The surgical management and treatment of advanced vulvar cancer are intended for gynaecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists who treat these complex patients. This guideline is intended to provide information for interested parties who may follow these patients once treatment is complete.

TARGET POPULATION

Adult women (18 years and older) with SCC of the vulva. Excluded from these guidelines are women with preinvasive disease.

OPTIONS

Women diagnosed with SCC of the vulva should be referred to a gynaecologic oncologist for initial evaluation, consideration for primary surgery and inguinal lymph node assessment, and potentially adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. All cases of vulvar cancer should have access to discussion at a multidisciplinary cancer case conference. Women who would otherwise require radical surgery such as abdominal-perineal resection or exenterative procedures may be considered for primary treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy.

EVIDENCE

For this guideline, relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Systematic Reviews using the following terms, either alone or in combination, with the search limited to English language materials: vulva, vulvar cancer, inguinofemoral lymph node dissection, sentinel nodes, systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant, adjuvant, primary, exenteration, survival, follow up. The initial search was performed in September 2016 with a final literature search in May 2017. Relevant evidence was selected for inclusion in the following order: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, observational studies, non-systematic reviews, case series, and reports. Additional significant articles were identified through cross-referencing the identified reviews. The total number of studies identified was 286, and 78 studies were included in this review.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Executive and Board of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada reviewed the content and submitted comments for consideration, and the Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework (Table 1). The interpretation of strong and weak recommendations is described in Table 2. The Summary of Findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

These guidelines are to encourage physicians in the appropriate use of sentinel inguinal lymph node assessment for SCC of the vulva. The committee also promotes the centralization of treatment of vulvar cancer in specialized treatment centres.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.

SPONSORS

This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Somatic Mutation Profiling in Premalignant Lesions of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) originates from the progression of either a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or differentiated-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN), often in a background of lichen sclerosus (LS). The mechanisms leading to the progression of these premalignant lesions to VSCC are elusive. This study aims to identify pathogenic mutations implicated in VSCC development. Using next-generation sequencing, 38 HSIL, 19 dVIN, 20 LS, of which 10 were solitary lesions and 10 with adjacent VSCC, and 10 VSCC adjacent to LS, were screened for hotspot mutations in 50 genes covered by the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Pathogenic mutations of TP53 were the most common genetic alterations identified in 53% and 24% of dVIN and HSIL cases, respectively, followed by CDKN2A (p16) mutated in 42% and 0% of dVIN and HSIL, respectively. Seven (70%) and three (30%) of 10 cases of VSCC associated with LS carried TP53 and CDKN2A mutations, respectively, whereas neither solitary LS nor LS associated with VSCC cases harbored mutations in these genes. It appears that TP53 mutations are early events during VSCC carcinogenesis, being present in both HSIL and dVIN lesions. Our preliminary data do not support a genetic background for the notion of LS as the VSCC premalignant lesion.

Tumor-free margins and local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relation of pathologic tumor-free margins and local recurrence in patients who underwent primary surgery for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, patients with stage I-III vulvar squamous cell carcinoma who underwent primary surgery between 2000 and 2018 were identified from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients were included and divided into three groups according to tumor-free margins: group 1 (<3 mm, n = 32); group 2 (≥3 to <8 mm, n = 151); group 3 (≥8 mm, n = 152). The median follow-up time was 73 months (range 2-240). A total of 78 (23.3%) patients developed local recurrence. With the inverse propensity score weighing method adjusting baseline characters, margins <8 mm had inferior local control (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.13-3.41). The 5-year local disease-free survival (DFS) was 48.2%, 81.5% and 84.6% for group 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in groin lymph nodes relapse (p = 0.850), distant metastases (p = 0.253), or disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.289) among the three groups. Margins <8 mm, midline involvement, multifocal disease, precancerous lesions on margins and depth of invasion >1 mm were found to be poor prognosticators for local DFS in univariate analysis. Multifocal disease was the strongest predictor for local recurrence in multivariate analysis (HR 4.32, 95% CI 2.67-6.99).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary surgery for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with tumor free-margins <8 mm have a higher local recurrence rate.

British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) vulval cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice

The purpose of this guideline is to collate evidence and propose evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with vulva carcinoma treated in the UK. Malignant melanoma may present via similar routes and will be discussed. The reader is referred to the Ano-uro-genital Mucosal Melanoma Full Guideline [1] for more detailed recommendations. The management of vulval sarcoma is outside of the scope of this guideline. For further information, including details of guideline development and GRADE of recommendations, please see BGCS website for details (https://www.bgcs.org.uk/professionals/guidelines-for-recent-publications/).

Vulvamalignome: eine interdisziplinäre Betrachtung

Vulvamalignome stellen die vierthäufigste Gruppe von gynäkologischen Krebserkrankungen dar. Erste Ansprechpartner sind typischerweise niedergelassene Dermatologen und Gynäkologen. Mit der jeweiligen Fachexpertise findet die Diagnose und Therapie idealerweise interdisziplinär zwischen spezialisierten Dermatoonkologen und gynäkologischen Onkologen statt. Vulvamalignome sind überwiegend Erkrankungen des höheren Lebensalters, obwohl alle histologischen Subtypen auch bei Frauen unter 30 Jahren vorkommen. Die Diagnose erfolgt oft verzögert. Eine genaue Kartierung von Biopsien (Mapping) ist von großer Bedeutung, da Lokalisation und Entfernung von der Mittellinie in Abhängigkeit von der zugrunde liegenden Histologie das operative Vorgehen bestimmen. Plattenepithelkarzinome machen mehr als 76 % der Vulvamalignome aus und vulväre intraepitheliale Neoplasien (VIN) sind dabei wichtige Vorstufen. Der zweithäufigste Typ der Vulvakarzinome ist das Basalzellkarzinom. Melanome machen 5,7 % der vulvären Malignome aus und ihre Prognose ist schlechter als die der kutanen Melanome. Die meisten Studien zu Checkpoint-Inhibitoren und zielgerichteten Therapien haben Patientinnen mit vulvären Melanomen nicht ausgeschlossen. Die vorliegende Evidenz wird im folgenden diskutiert. Die Methode der Wahl bei lokal resezierbaren Vulvamalignomen ist die Exzision. Angesichts ihrer Seltenheit sollte die Behandlung in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen, um eine optimale Krankheitskontrolle zu erreichen und Kontinenz und sexuelle Funktion bestmöglich zu erhalten.

Vulvar malignancies: an interdisciplinary perspective

Vulvar cancer represents the fourth most common gynecologic malignancy and is often encountered by the general Dermatologist or Gynecologist. Dermatooncologists and Gynecologic Oncologists share expertise in this field and the diagnosis and treatment should ideally be interdisciplinary. All subtypes are typically seen in the later decades of life, although all histologic subtypes have been described in women younger than 30 years. The diagnosis is often delayed. Exact mapping of biopsies is of high importance, as the location and distance from the midline guides the surgical approach depending on the underlying histology. Squamous cell carcinoma accounts for more than 76 % of vulvar cancer with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia being an important precursor. Basal cell carcinoma is the second most common vulvar malignancy. Melanoma accounts for 5.7 % of vulvar cancer and has a worse prognosis compared to cutaneous melanoma. Most of the trials on checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy have not excluded patients with vulvar melanoma and the preliminary evidence is reviewed in the manuscript.

Surgery remains the primary treatment modality of locally resectable vulvar cancer. In view of the rarity, the procedure should be performed in dedicated cancer centers to achieve optimal disease control and maintain continence and sexual function whenever possible.

Roadmap to Local Tumour Growth: Insights from Cervical Cancer

Wide tumour excision is currently the standard approach to surgical treatment of solid cancers including carcinomas of the lower genital tract. This strategy is based on the premise that tumours exhibit isotropic growth potential. We reviewed and analysed local tumour spreading patterns in 518 patients with cancer of the uterine cervix who underwent surgical tumour resection. Based on data obtained from pathological examination of the surgical specimen, we applied computational modelling techniques to simulate local tumour spread in order to identify parameters influencing preferred infiltration patterns and used area-proportional Euler diagrams to detect and confirm ordered patterns of tumour spread. Some anatomical structures, e.g. tissues of the urinary bladder, were significantly more likely to be infiltrated than other structures, e.g. the ureter and the rectum. Computational models assuming isotropic growth could not explain these infiltration patterns. Introducing ontogenetic distance of a tissue relative to the uterine cervix as a parameter led to accurate predictions of the clinically observed infiltration likelihoods. The clinical data indicates that successive infiltration likelihoods of ontogenetically distant tissues are nearly perfect subsets of ontogenetically closer tissues. The prevailing assumption of isotropic tumour extension has significant shortcomings in the case of cervical cancer. Rather, cervical cancer spread seems to follow ontogenetically defined trajectories.

Prognostic value of serum creatine level in patients with vulvar cancer

Vulvar cancer is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis that generally occurs in elderly patients. The individual prognosis is difficult to assess. Serum creatinine levels are frequently elevated in elderly patients. Recent evidence have shown shown that - besides indicating kidney impairment - serum creatinine levels may be used to predict the survival in cancer patients. Several studies observed an association between elevated serum creatinine levels and poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. In this retrospective cohort study, serum creatinine levels were evaluated in 170 patients with invasive vulvar cancer. Serum creatinine levels were correlated to established clinicopathologic factors. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis were performed. Elevated serum creatinine levels (>1.2 mg/dl) were significantly associated with both poor disease specific and overall survival. Three year overall survival rates were 74.8% and 32.5% for patients with serum creatinine levels of ≤ and >1.2 mg/dl, respectively. In a multivariate survival model, serum creatinine levels were significantly associated with overall survival independent of tumor stage and patients' age. In conclusion, pretherapeutic serum creatinine levels may be useful as an independent prognostic parameter in patients with vulvar cancer.

Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer: Impact of tumor-free margin distance on recurrence and survival. A multicentre cohort analysis from the francogyn study group

OBJECTIVE

In vulvar cancer, it is admitted that tumor-free margin distance is one of the most important element for locoregional control. It is currently recommended to surgically remove the tumor with at least an 8 mm tumor-free margin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor-free margin distance on recurrence and survival in vulvar cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2016, 112 patients surgically treated for a vulvar squamous cell cancer were included in a retrospective multicenter study. Overall, disease-free and metastasis-free survivals were analyzed according to tumor-free margin distance.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (margin <3 mm, n = 47); group 2 (margin ≥3 mm to < 8 mm, n = 48) and group 3 (margin ≥8 mm, n = 17). During the study, 26,8% patients developed recurrence (n = 30) after a median of 8 months (1-69). Analysis of 5-year overall survival, as well as disease-free and metastasis-free survivals, did not reveal a difference between groups. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients with a tumor-free margin <8 mm (group 1 and 2). It showed that histological lesions observed closest to the edge of the specimen were more often invasive or in situ carcinoma lesions in group 1 than in group 2, in which VIN lesions were mainly observed at this location. After re-excision, no patients in group 1 and 50% (n = 2) patients in group 2 developed recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study did not reveal a significant impact of tumor-free margin distance on recurrence and survival in vulvar cancer. Moreover, the benefit of re-excision seems stronger when tumor-free margins are positive or very close (<3 mm), cases in which invasive or in situ lesions are often present closest to the edge of the specimen.

Vulval Cancer: When should I Stop Resecting? Identifying the Factors that Predict Recurrence

Context: Vulval cancer surgery has become more conservative and it is important to understand whether resection margins alone influence recurrence rates or whether other prognostic factors should be considered when planning treatment. Aims: The aim of this study is to define factors that predict vulval cancer recurrence, enabling development of a recurrence prediction model. Settings and Design: This was a Aretrospective descriptive analysis of new vulval squamous cell carcinoma cases in a gynecological oncology center (January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013). Subjects and Methods: Analysis of tumor characteristics and treatments. Patient outcomes were recorded, identifying recurrences, and subsequent interventions. Statistical Analysis Used: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression tools applied to determine recurrence risk factors. Results: Seventy patients underwent primary vulval surgery. Bilateral groin node dissection was performed in 26/70 (37.1%) cases and unilateral groin node dissection in 9/70 (12.9%) cases. 57/70 (82%) cases had a negative vulval resection margin, with 67% <8-mm margin. 18/70 (26%) patients underwent adjuvant treatment. Overall recurrence rate of 21/70 (30%): 14/70 locally and 7/70 at the groin. Median survival was 84.2 months and median disease-free interval was 19.1 months. Factors that were statistically significant in predicting recurrence were positive groin histology, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and disease stage. Conclusions: We reported a reduction in the size of tumor-free margins at primary excision. The recurrence rate of 30% is within the previously reported range, suggesting that factors aside from resection margin (LVSI, stage, and groin node involvement) are also important in predicting recurrence. These factors should be incorporated into a prediction model when planning adjuvant treatment.

Margin status revisited in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of local recurrence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in relation to tumor- and/or precursor lesion free pathologic margins.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma surgically treated in two Dutch expert centers between 2000 and 2010 were included. All pathology slides were independently reviewed by two expert gynecopathologists, and local recurrence was defined as any recurrent disease located on the vulva. Time to first local recurrence was compared for different subgroups using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total 287 patients with a median follow-up of 80months (range 0-204) were analyzed. The actuarial local recurrence rate ten years after treatment was 42.5%. Pathologic tumor free margin distance did not influence the risk on local recurrence (HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.99-1.06)), neither using a cutoff of eight, five, or three millimeters. Multivariable analyses showed a higher local recurrence rate in patients with dVIN and LS in the margin (HR 2.76 (95% CI 1.62-4.71)), in patients with dVIN in the margin (HR 2.14 (95% CI 1.11-4.12)), and a FIGO stage II or higher (HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.05-2.48)).

CONCLUSIONS

Local recurrences frequently occur in patients with primary vulvar carcinoma and are associated with dVIN (with or without LS) in the pathologic margin rather than any tumor free margin distance. Our results should lead to increased awareness among physicians of an ongoing risk for local recurrence and need for life-long follow-up. Intensified follow-up and treatment protocols for patients with dVIN in the margin should be evaluated in future research.

Superficially invasive stage IA vulvar squamous cell carcinoma-therapy and prognosis

OBJECTIVES

Superficially invasive stage IA squamous vulvar cancer (VSCC) is defined as a single lesion measuring ≤2 cm with a depth of invasion of ≤1.0 mm (FIGO stage IA). This article examines the natural course and prognosis of superficially invasive VSCC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of 46 patients (median age 58 years) with superficially invasive stage IA VSCC receiving wide local excision between January 1996 and November 2014 in the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.

RESULTS

Median tumor size was 4 mm. In 39/46 (84.8%) patients peri-tumoral high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL) and/or lichen sclerosus (LS) of the vulva were histologically detected: 34 (74.0%) usual type high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN, HSIL), 4 (8.7%) LS with simultaneous VIN (3 uVIN, 1 differentiated VIN (dVIN)), 1 (2.2%) with LS only. 37/46 (80.4%) patients had a R0 resection; in 2 (4.3%) a high-grade VIN was detected in the margin and in 7 (15.2%) the resection status was unknown. The mean follow-up was 58 (range 10-185) months. Four patients (8.7%) suffered from an invasive recurrence after 4, 17, 40, and 54 months, three in the vulva and one in the groin. All local recurrences occurred in women with LS in a combination with high-grade VIN (3 uVIN, 1 dVIN). Two were treated surgically again including inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy (ifLAE) (no regional lymph node metastasis histologically) as invasion depth exceeded 1 mm. The third patient refused treatment. Inguinal recurrence was treated with a bilateral ifLAE, revealing one positive lymph node, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (groins, pelvis). None of these patients had experienced further recurrences at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Superficially invasive VSCC is characterized by having a very good prognosis. Sole surgical therapy is highly effective. Patients with LS might benefit additionally from intensified surveillance and adequate maintenance therapy in specialized centers.

Surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma, different for the vulva?

INTRODUCTION

The recommended pathological resection margin (8 mm) for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is broader than for SCC located elsewhere, and does not depend on tumor grade or lesion size. Our aim is to evaluate the resection margin in vulvar SCC in relation to local recurrence, and to determine the impact of other prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of all surgically treated patients at the Gynecological Oncology Center South with vulvar SCC, FIGO IB-IIIC, between 2005 and 2015 were analysed retrospectively. The relation between the pathological resection margin and other clinicopathological factors with the risk of local recurrence was analysed.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 167 patients, the tumor was radically removed in 87% of the patients. Yet, in 57% the pathological resection margin was <8 mm. Including re-excisions, the median closest margin was 7.0 mm. There was no significant difference in the risk of local recurrence for a resection margin <8 mm or ≥8 mm (25.0% (n = 20) and 22.2% (n = 16)), nor in the median resection margin of patients with or without local recurrence (6.5 mm and 7.0 mm). Lichen sclerosus was the only significant risk factor for local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A pathological resection margin <8 mm was not related to an increased risk of local recurrence. The most important predictor of local recurrence was the presence of lichen sclerosus. A resection margin <8 mm in vulvar SCC can therefore be accepted, especially in tumors located close to clitoris, urethra or anus.

Prognostic impact of reduced tumor-free margin distance on long-term survival in FIGO stage IB/II vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the minimum tumor-free margin distance conferring long-term oncological safety in patients diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB/II vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in patients with stage IB/II VSCC treated at a single institution in Turin, Italy. The main aim was to identify the minimum tumor-free margin distance that confers oncological safety in early-stage VSCC. Patients were divided in groups according to tumor-free histological margin distance to compare survival outcomes. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence rate (RR) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method for the newly proposed and the currently recommended 8 mm margin cut-off. Log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients met the study criteria. Median age was 68 years and median follow-up was 80 months. The minimum margin distance that conferred long-term oncological safety was 5 mm. OS, DSS were significantly lower in the <5 mm group when compared with the ≥5 mm group (p=0.002 and p=0.033, respectively) although no difference in RR was observed between groups. Analysis at the 8-mm cut-off indicated there is no difference in OS, DSS, or RR between groups.

CONCLUSION

FIGO stage IB/II VSCC patients' prognosis is affected by margin distance. Long-term survival is significantly reduced in patients with tumor-free margins <5 mm, even in the absence of lymph node metastasis. Thus, these patients should be offered further surgical or adjuvant treatment.

The Role of Pathological Margin Distance and Prognostic Factors After Primary Surgery in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of clear surgical margin distance and other factors associated with the recurrence and survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

Methods/Materials

A total of 107 patients operated for vulvar carcinoma from 1996 to 2016 were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into subgroups with clear pathological margin of 2 mm or less, greater than 2 to less than 8 mm, and 8 mm or greater for the analysis of the prognostic impact of the clear margin distance. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

The median age of the patients was 66 years. The median follow-up was 69 months. The labia majora and/or labia minora were the most common sites of involvement. Radical local excision and radical vulvectomy were performed in 96 and 11 patients, respectively. Thirty-nine patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. The overall recurrence rate was 46%. At 231 months, the actuarial local recurrence rate was 18.6%. Patients with clear pathological margin of 2 mm or less had significantly higher local recurrence risk. Five-year disease-free survival was 32.7%. Older age and adjuvant chemotherapy were found as independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that a more than 2 mm tumor-free margins is associated with better local control. In addition, older age is an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in High-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Two-Institutional Italian Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the treatment benefit and patterns of recurrence for patients with high-risk vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1999 to June 2016, 51 patients underwent total or partial deep vulvectomy with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant RT with 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions +/- a 4-10 Gy boost. 17 (33.3%) women received concomitant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 81 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 52 and 63%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, patients aged ≤ 76 years and those receiving an RT total dose of > 54 Gy had a significantly lower risk of progression (p = 0.044 and 0.045; p = 0.012 and 0.018, respectively) and death (p = 0.015 and 0.011; p = 0.015 and 0.026, respectively). There was a trend towards a lower risk of progression for patients with tumor size ≤ 4 (p = 0.098) and negative lymphovascular space involvement (p = 0.080). Also, there was a trend towards a higher risk of death (p = 0.075) for grade 3 tumors. Concomitant chemotherapy provided no significant benefit.

CONCLUSION

Only age and RT total dose are significant prognostic variables for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with primary surgery and adjuvant RT to improve local and locoregional control.

Prognostic factors for local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In patients treated for early-stage squamous cell vulvar carcinoma local recurrence is reported in up to 40% after ten years. Knowledge on prognostic factors related to local recurrences should be helpful to select high risk patients and/or to develop strategies to prevent local recurrences.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the current knowledge on the incidence of local recurrences in vulvar carcinoma related to clinicopathologic and cell biologic variables.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant studies were identified by an extensive online electronic search in July 2017.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting prognostic factors specific for local recurrences of vulvar carcinoma were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two review authors independently performed data selection, extraction and assessment of study quality. The risk difference was calculated for each prognostic factor when described in two or more studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included; most of all were retrospective and mainly reported pathologic prognostic factors. Our review indicates an estimated annual local recurrence rate of 4% without plateauing. The prognostic relevance for local recurrence of vulvar carcinoma of all analyzed variables remains equivocal, including pathologic tumor free margin distance <8mm, presence of lichen sclerosus, groin lymph node metastases and a variety of primary tumor characteristics (grade of differentiation, tumor size, tumor focality, depth of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor localization and presence of human papillomavirus).

CONCLUSIONS

Current quality of data on prognostic factors for local recurrences in vulvar carcinoma patients does not allow evidence-based clinical decision making. Further research on prognostic factors, applying state of the art methodology is needed to identify high-risk patients and to develop alternative primary and secondary prevention strategies.