1
|
Chmiel P, Rutkowski P, Spałek M, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Czarnecka AM. What is the Optimal Treatment Strategy after Sarcoma R2 Surgery? Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:798-812. [PMID: 38809411 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01218-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, most commonly occurring in the extremity but also in the retroperitoneum. The curative treatment for STS is radical surgery with wide margins, in some cases in combination with perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nonradical resection (R2) of STS has been an emerging issue in recent decades, as optimal subsequent management remains debatable. Similarly, there is still no consensus on optimal surgical margins. Combining multiple treatment modalities in adjuvant therapy can achieve local and distant control in patients following surgery with positive margins. Patients who have undergone nonradical resection therefore require additional surgical interventions, and adjuvant radiotherapy resulting in a better prognosis but a higher number of complications. Following non-radical treatment, patients with limb and trunk wall sarcomas and retroperitoneal sarcomas should also undergo increased oncological surveillance. Given the potential issues that may emerge in such clinical situations, it is crucial to up-date the current guidelines to enhance the long-term prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Chmiel
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-718, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
- Biobank Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Callegaro D, Barretta F, Raut CP, Johnston W, Strauss DC, Honoré C, Bonvalot S, Fairweather M, Rutkowski P, van Houdt WJ, Gladdy RA, Tirotta F, Tzanis D, Skoczylas J, Haas RL, Miceli R, Swallow CJ, Gronchi A. New Sarculator Prognostic Nomograms for Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Case Volume Does Matter. Ann Surg 2024; 279:857-865. [PMID: 37753660 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the current Sarculator retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) prognostic nomograms considering the improvement in patient prognosis and the case volume effect. BACKGROUND Survival of patients with primary RPS has been increasing over time, and the volume-outcome relationship has been well recognized. Nevertheless, the specific impact on prognostic nomograms is unknown. METHODS All consecutive adult patients with primary localized RPS treated at 8 European and North American sarcoma reference centers between 2010 and 2017 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: high-volume centers (HVC, ≥13 cases/year) and low-volume centers (LVC, <13 cases/year). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariable analyses for OS and DFS were performed. The nomograms were updated by recalibration. Nomograms performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (Harrell C index) and calibration (calibration plot). RESULTS The HVC and LVC groups comprised 857 and 244 patients, respectively. The median annual primary RPS case volume (interquartile range) was 24.0 in HVC (15.0-41.3) and 9.0 in LVC (1.8-10.3). Five-year OS was 71.4% (95% CI: 68.3%-74.7%) in the HVC cohort and 63.3% (56.8%-70.5%) in the LVC cohort ( P =0.012). Case volume was associated with both OS (LVC vs. HVC hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, P =0.011) and DFS (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.57-2.37, P <0.001) at multivariable analyses. When applied to the study cohorts, the Sarculator nomograms showed good discrimination (Harrell C index between 0.68 and 0.73). The recalibrated nomograms showed good calibration in the HVC group, whereas the original nomograms showed good calibration in the LVC group. CONCLUSIONS New nomograms for patients with primary RPS treated with surgery at high-volume versus low-volume sarcoma reference centers are available in the Sarculator app.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Callegaro
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barretta
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chandrajit P Raut
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Wendy Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dirk C Strauss
- Sarcoma Unit, Department of Academic Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Honoré
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Mark Fairweather
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca A Gladdy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio Tirotta
- Sarcoma Unit, Department of Academic Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jacek Skoczylas
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rick L Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carol J Swallow
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blay JY, Penel N, Valentin T, Anract P, Duffaud F, Dufresne A, Verret B, Cordoba A, Italiano A, Brahmi M, Henon C, Amouyel T, Ray-Coquard I, Ferron G, Boudou-Rouquette P, Tlemsani C, Salas S, Rochwerger R, Faron M, Bompas E, Ducassou A, Gangloff D, Gouin F, Firmin N, Piperno-Neumann S, Rios M, Ropars M, Kurtz JE, Le Nail LR, Bertucci F, Carrere S, Llacer C, Watson S, Bonvalot S, Leroux A, Perrin C, Gantzer J, Pracht M, Narciso B, Monneur A, Lebbe C, Hervieu A, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Fiorenza F, Chaigneau L, Nevieres ZM, Soibinet P, Bouché O, Guillemet C, Spano JP, Ruzic JC, Isambert N, Vaz G, Meeus P, Karanian M, Ngo C, Coindre JM, De Pinieux G, Le Loarer F, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Toulmonde M, Le Cesne A. Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:351-363. [PMID: 38246351 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020. RESULTS A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon.
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - T Valentin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - P Anract
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - B Verret
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A Cordoba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Henon
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Amouyel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | | | - C Tlemsani
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - S Salas
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - R Rochwerger
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - M Faron
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes St. Herblain
| | - A Ducassou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - D Gangloff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - N Firmin
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Ropars
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU Rennes, Rennes
| | | | | | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - S Carrere
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - C Llacer
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - S Watson
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - A Leroux
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - J Gantzer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Pracht
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - B Narciso
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tours
| | - A Monneur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Dermatology, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris; Department of CIC, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris
| | - A Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
| | - P Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHU Limoges, Limoges
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medicine, CHU Besancon, Besancon
| | | | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medicine, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen
| | - O Bouché
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Reims, Reims
| | - C Guillemet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre J Godinot Reims, Reims
| | - J P Spano
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétriere, Paris
| | - J C Ruzic
- Departement d'oncologie, CHU, La Reunion
| | - N Isambert
- Service d'oncologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Karanian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Ngo
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - J M Coindre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | | | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Chemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Morelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen W, Ye M, Sun Y, Wei Y, Huang Y. Analysis of clinical factors impacting recurrence in myxofibrosarcoma. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3903. [PMID: 38365844 PMCID: PMC10873400 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53606-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a malignant fibroblastic/myofibroblastic neoplasm with a prominent myxoid area. It has the clinical features of frequent local recurrence (LR) and occasional distant metastasis. Robust epidemiological data on MFS in China are lacking. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine the natural history of MFS, identify prognostic factors for recurrence and describe the real-life outcomes of MFS. We reviewed 52 patients with primary MFS from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University diagnosed between 2016 and 2020. All tumors were subjected to retrospective univariate analysis for prognostic factors of the disease, including tumor size, grade, location and sex; patient age; planned operation; surgical margin; and laboratory results. The significant factors identified by univariate analysis were subsequently analyzed via multivariate analysis. Overall survival (OS), post-treatment LR and metastatic-free survival were assessed as outcomes. The median age was 61 years (range, 13-93). Fourteen (26.92%) patients exhibited low grade disease, and 38 (73.08%) exhibited high grade disease. Among the 29 males, and 23 females, 15 (28.85%) had tumors in the trunk, 37 (71.15%) had tumors in the extremities, 26 had undergone planned surgery, and 26 had unexpected unplanned operation. The margin was negative in 39 (75%) patients and positive in 13 patients (25%). The serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration was high level in 33 (63.46%) patients and low level in 19 (36.54%) patients. The serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were low in 23 (44.23%) patients and high in 29 (55.77%) patients. LR was observed in 25 patients (48.08%), and 4 patients developed metastasis. A worse LR rate was found for patients with a low CK level (84.21%) than for those with a high CK level (27.27%) at 5 years (p < 0.05). The LR rate of patients who underwent planned surgery was lower than that of patients who underwent unplanned surgery (p < 0.05). There were significantly more patients with positive margins than patients with negative margins (92.30%, and 33.33%, respectively; p < 0.05). Moreover, superficial tumors were also associated with greater recurrence rate (2/20 [10%]) than deep tumors, (23/32 [71.86%]) [p < 0.05]. The probability of LR in patients with MFS was significantly greater in association with unplanned operations, positive margins, low serum CK levels or superficial tumor depth. These data could help identify high-risk patients; thus, more careful follow-up should be performed for higher-risk patients. Diagnosis and treatment at qualified regular medical centers can reduce the local recurrence rate of MFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlin Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
- Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Ming Ye
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Ye Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Yongzhong Wei
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Yumin Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hong AM, Sundaram A, Perianayagam G, Lo H, Lawless A, Zhou D, McDonough J, Thompson SR, Maclean F, Connolly EA, Coker D, Mar J, Lazarakis S, Johnston A. Surgery at specialised sarcoma centres improves patient outcomes - A systematic review by the Australia and New Zealand sarcoma association clinical practice guidelines working party. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106951. [PMID: 37301636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal management of sarcoma requires multidisciplinary team input throughout the process of diagnosis, treatment and follow up. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of surgery performed at specialised sarcoma centres on outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) model. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central databases were queried for publications that evaluated the local control, limb salvage rate, 30-day and 90-day surgical mortality, and overall survival in patients undergoing surgery in a specialist sarcoma centre compared with non-specialist centre. Each study was screened by two independent reviewers for suitability. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed. RESULTS Sixty-six studies were identified. The majority of studies were Level III-3 as assessed by the NHMRC Evidence Hierarchy, whilst just over half of the studies were of good quality. Definitive surgery performed at specialised sarcoma centres was associated with improved local control as defined by lower rate of local relapse, higher rate of negative surgical margins, improved local recurrence free survival and higher limb conservation rate. Available evidences show a favourable pattern of lower 30-day and 90-day mortality rates, and greater overall survival when surgery was performed in specialist sarcoma centres compared with non-specialised centres. CONCLUSIONS Evidences support better oncological outcomes when surgery is performed at specialised sarcoma centre. Patients with suspected sarcoma should be referred early to a specialised sarcoma centre for multidisciplinary management, which includes planned biopsy and definitive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Hong
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Abay Sundaram
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Ganaps Perianayagam
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Helen Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia; Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia
| | - Anna Lawless
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Deborah Zhou
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | | | - Stephen R Thompson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, 2131, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2132, Australia
| | - Fiona Maclean
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Connolly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - David Coker
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Jasmine Mar
- Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Smaro Lazarakis
- Health Sciences Library, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tirotta F, Bacon A, Collins S, Desai A, Liu H, Paley L, Strauss D, Strauss SJ. Primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A comparison of survival outcomes in specialist and non-specialist sarcoma centres. Eur J Cancer 2023; 188:20-28. [PMID: 37178646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus guidelines outline that patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) should be managed within specialist sarcoma centres (SSC). There is, however, a paucity of population-based data detailing incidence and outcomes in these patients. Hence, we aimed to evaluate patterns of care among RPS patients in England and compare outcomes for those undergoing surgery in high-volume specialist sarcoma centres (HV-SSC), low-volume SSC (LV-SSC), and non-SSC (N-SSC). METHODS Data on patients diagnosed with primary RPS between 2013 and 2018 were extracted from NHS Digital's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service using the national cancer registration dataset. Diagnostic pathways, treatment, and survival outcomes were compared between HV-SSC, LV-SSC, and N-SSC. Uni- and multivariate analyses were calculated. RESULTS Of 1878 patients diagnosed with RPS, 1120 (60%) underwent surgery within 12 months of diagnosis, with 847 (76%) operated on at SSC; of these, 432 patients (51%) were operated on in HV-SSC, and 415 (49%) in LV-SSC. One- and 5-year estimated overall survival (OS) rates for patients undergoing surgery in N-SSC were 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.8-75.7) and 42.0% (CI: 35.9-47.9), compared to 85.0% (CI: 81.1-88.1) and 51.7% (CI: 46.6-56.6) in LV-SSC (p < 0.01), and 87.4% (CI: 83.9-90.2) and 62.8% (CI: 57.9-67.4) in HV-SSC, (p < 0.01). After adjusting for patient- and treatment-related factors, patients treated in HV-SSC were found to have significantly longer OS than those treated at LV-SSC, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.78 (CI: 0.62-0.96, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients with RPS undergoing surgery in HV-SSC have significantly better survival outcomes than those treated in N-SSC and L-SSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Tirotta
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Andrew Bacon
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, Wellington Place, Leeds LS1 4AP, UK
| | - Shane Collins
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, Wellington Place, Leeds LS1 4AP, UK; Research Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Anant Desai
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hanhua Liu
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, Wellington Place, Leeds LS1 4AP, UK
| | - Lizz Paley
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, Wellington Place, Leeds LS1 4AP, UK
| | - Dirk Strauss
- Sarcoma Unit, Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sandra J Strauss
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, Wellington Place, Leeds LS1 4AP, UK; Research Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baia M, Ford SJ, Dumitra S, Samà L, Naumann DN, Spolverato G, Callegaro D. Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1125-1132. [PMID: 35277304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Baia
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel J Ford
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Laura Samà
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - David N Naumann
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Section of Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Dario Callegaro
- Sarcoma Service, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hellingman T, van Beneden MLH, den Bakker CM, Zonderhuis BM, Kazemier G. Perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases on e-consultation in transmural care: a qualitative study : Is privacy really an issue? BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:541. [PMID: 37231462 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09408-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive cancer networks have been established to deliver high-quality care for patients with cancer. Logistic challenges are faced, when patients need to be referred for specialized treatments. Despite strengthened privacy legislations, digital platforms are increasingly used to consult specialists from dedicated liver centers or refer patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) for local treatment strategies. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of patients with CRLM regarding e-consultation of transmural specialists. METHODS A focus group study was conducted. Patients referred from regional hospitals to an academic liver center for treatment of CRLM were asked to participate. Focus group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic content analysis of data was conducted, comprising open, axial, and selective coding of the transcripts. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were used. RESULTS Two focus groups were held, involving 11 patients and 8 relatives. Three major themes were identified with regard to e-consultation in transmural care: 'data management', 'expertise', and 'information and coordination'. Confidence in the expertise of physicians appeared most important during the course of treatment, as patients experienced uncertainty after diagnosis of cancer. Despite the privacy risks, use of digital communication platforms to contact experts in the field were strongly endorsed to improve eligibility for potentially curative treatment. Moreover, e-consultation of specialists may reduce waiting times, due to effective coordination of care. CONCLUSION Initiatives to improve medical data transfer between care providers were encouraged to achieve effective coordination of oncological care. The potential hazard of privacy violation associated with digital data exchange is accepted by patients and their relatives, provided that use of digital data improves patient's own health care, research or education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Hellingman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M L H van Beneden
- Department of Strategy and Innovation, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C M den Bakker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Boerhaavelaan 22, 2035 RC, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - B M Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2781-2791. [PMID: 36975424 PMCID: PMC10047263 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.
Collapse
|
10
|
Blay JY, Italiano A, Penel N, Le Loarer F, Karanian M, De Pinieux G, Coindre JM, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Gouin F, Toulmonde M, Le Cesne A. Impact d’un réseau de centre de référence pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge des patients atteints de sarcomes en France depuis 2010. BULLETIN DE L'ACADÉMIE NATIONALE DE MÉDECINE 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.banm.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
11
|
Roohani S, Ehret F, Kobus M, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Striefler JK, Rau D, Öllinger R, Jarosch A, Budach V, Kaul D. Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:159. [PMID: 36104789 PMCID: PMC9472188 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02072-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2–G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT.
Methods We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included. Results Initial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / − chemotherapy are ongoing. Conclusions Retrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02072-9.
Collapse
|
12
|
Acem I, van de Sande MAJ. Prediction tools for the personalized management of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:1011-1016. [PMID: 36047022 PMCID: PMC9987162 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b9.bjj-2022-0647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Prediction tools are instruments which are commonly used to estimate the prognosis in oncology and facilitate clinical decision-making in a more personalized manner. Their popularity is shown by the increasing numbers of prediction tools, which have been described in the medical literature. Many of these tools have been shown to be useful in the field of soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities (eSTS). In this annotation, we aim to provide an overview of the available prediction tools for eSTS, provide an approach for clinicians to evaluate the performance and usefulness of the available tools for their own patients, and discuss their possible applications in the management of patients with an eSTS.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1011-1016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibtissam Acem
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tirotta F, Fadel MG, Hodson J, Parente A, Wilkerson H, Almond LM, Ford SJ, Hayes AJ, Desai A, Strauss DC. Association Between Ageing and Short-Term Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7320-7330. [PMID: 35854029 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12231-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the population ages, more elderly patients are receiving surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). However, high-quality data investigating associations between ageing and prognosis are lacking. Our study aimed to investigate whether ageing is associated with inferior short-term survival outcomes after RPS surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS between 2008 and 2019 at two tertiary sarcoma centres were analysed. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality, and the primary explanatory variable was patient age, classified as: < 55, 55-64, 65-74 or 75+ years. RESULTS The 692 patients undergoing surgery (mean age 60.8 ± 13.8 years) had a 1-year mortality rate of 9.4%, which differed significantly by age (p < 0.001), with rates of 7.2%, 6.9%, 8.7% and 22.8% for the < 55, 55-64, 65-74 and 75+ years groups, respectively. The distribution of causes of death also differed significantly by age (p = 0.023), with 22% and 28% of deaths in the 65-74 and 75+ years groups caused by post-operative complications, versus none in the < 55 and 55-64 years groups. On multivariable analysis, age of 75+ years (versus < 55 years) was a significant independent predictor of 1-year mortality [odds ratio (OR) 7.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.63-18.9, p < 0.001]; no significant increase in risk was observed in the 55-64 (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28-1.87) or 65-74 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.15) years groups. CONCLUSIONS Post-operative complications are an important cause of deaths in elderly patients. These findings are relevant to decision-making and counselling when surgery is considered for patients with RPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Tirotta
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Michael G Fadel
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Research Development and Innovation, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Helene Wilkerson
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L Max Almond
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Samuel J Ford
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Andrew J Hayes
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anant Desai
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Dirk C Strauss
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Definition of the Surgical Case Complexity in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Tumors of the Extremities and Trunk. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061559. [PMID: 35326712 PMCID: PMC8946284 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Soft tissue tumors are heterogeneous tumor entities that often require surgical intervention for treatment. While some tumors are easy to resect, others require extremely complex, interdisciplinary surgery depending on the tumor type, localization and biological behavior. Up to now, there has not been an instrument able to objectify the complexity of such a surgery; therefore, we attempted to establish a complexity score for the description of soft tissue tumor surgeries. Furthermore, we aimed to categorize surgeries in such a way that patients can be assigned the best treatment such that a cost-effective approach can be taken. Abstract Background: We intend to establish a complexity score for soft tissue tumor surgeries to compare the complexities of different soft tissue tumor surgeries and to ultimately assign affected patients to appropriate treatments. Methods: We developed a soft tissue tumor complexity score (STS-SCS) based on three pillars: in addition to patient-related factors, tumor biology and surgery-associated parameters were taken into account. The STS-SCS was applied to our sampling group of 711 patients. Results: The minimum STS-SCS was 4, the maximum score was 34 and the average score 11.4 ± 5.9. The scores of patients with malignant diagnoses were notably higher and more widely scattered than those of patients with benign or intermediate malignant tumors. To better categorize the complexities of individual surgeries, we established four categories using the collected data as a reference dataset. Each of the categories contained approximately one-quarter of the registered patients. Discussion: The STS-SCS allows soft tissue tumor surgeries to be retrospectively evaluated for their complexity and forms the basis for the creation of a prospective concept to provide patients with the right intervention in the right geographic location, which can lead to better results and provision of the most cost-effective overall treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Overall Survival of Patients with Myxofibrosarcomas: An Epidemiological Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051102. [PMID: 35267410 PMCID: PMC8909833 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a rare mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma type, with a high local recurrence (LR) rate. Robust epidemiological data on MFS are lacking. We, therefore, aimed to identify prognostic factors and describe real-life outcomes of a large cohort of 908 MFS patients obtained from the nationwide database of the Netherlands Cancer Registry and diagnosed between 2002 and 2019. Median Overall survival (OS) was 155 (range 0.1-215) months, with a five-year OS of 67.7%. No improvement of OS was found over time. Multivariable Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated known prognostic factors for OS, such as older age, tumour size, and histological grade with the addition of sex. Surgery at sarcoma expertise centres, instead of general hospitals, was associated with better OS outcomes. In a subcohort of 177 patients, 39% developed LR with a median time to recurrence of 20 months. From LR on, the median OS was 64.0 months (CI 95% 38.5-89.5). In 28%, distant metastases were diagnosed with a median OS of 34.3 months (CI 95% 28.8-39.8) after diagnosis of the primary tumour. In this largest nationwide cohort so far, survival outcomes and recurrence rates for MFS patients did not improve over time, emphasizing the need to improve treatment strategies and suggesting a role for sarcoma expertise centres.
Collapse
|
16
|
Melis AS, Vos M, Schuurman MS, van Dalen T, van Houdt WJ, van der Hage JA, Schrage YM, Been LB, Bonenkamp JB, Bemelmans MHA, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Ho VKY. Incidence of unplanned excisions of soft tissue sarcomas in the Netherlands: A population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:994-1000. [PMID: 34848102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Timely recognition of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) remains challenging, potentially leading to unplanned excisions (also known as 'whoops procedures'). This population-based study charted the occurrence of unplanned excisions and identified associated patient, tumour, and treatment-related characteristics. Furthermore, it presents an overview of the outcomes and clinical management following an unplanned excision. METHODS From the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) database, information was obtained on 2187 adult patients diagnosed with STS in 2016-2019 who underwent surgery. Tumours located in the mediastinum, heart or retroperitoneum were excluded, as well as incidental findings. Differences between patients with planned and unplanned excisions were assessed with chi-square tests and a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS Overall, unplanned excisions comprise 18.2% of all first operations for STS, with a quarter of them occurring outside a hospital. Within hospitals, the unplanned excision rate was 14.4%. Unplanned excisions were more often performed on younger patients, and tumours unsuspected of being STS prior to surgery were generally smaller (≤5 cm) and superficially located. Preoperative imaging was omitted more frequently in these cases. An unplanned excision more often resulted in positive margins, requiring re-excision. Patients who had an unplanned excision outside of a sarcoma centre were more often discussed at or referred to a sarcoma centre, particularly in case of residual tumour. DISCUSSION Potential improvement in preventing unplanned excisions may be achieved by better compliance to preoperative imaging and referral guidelines, and stimulating continuous awareness of STS among general surgeons, general practitioners and private practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie S Melis
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Melinda S Schuurman
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jos A van der Hage
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne M Schrage
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lukas B Been
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes B Bonenkamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent K Y Ho
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stacchiotti S, Miah AB, Frezza AM, Messiou C, Morosi C, Caraceni A, Antonescu CR, Bajpai J, Baldini E, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JVMG, Boye K, Brodowicz T, Callegaro D, De Alava E, Deoras-Sutliff M, Dufresne A, Eriksson M, Errani C, Fedenko A, Ferraresi V, Ferrari A, Fletcher CDM, Garcia Del Muro X, Gelderblom H, Gladdy RA, Gouin F, Grignani G, Gutkovich J, Haas R, Hindi N, Hohenberger P, Huang P, Joensuu H, Jones RL, Jungels C, Kasper B, Kawai A, Le Cesne A, Le Grange F, Leithner A, Leonard H, Lopez Pousa A, Martin Broto J, Merimsky O, Merriam P, Miceli R, Mir O, Molinari M, Montemurro M, Oldani G, Palmerini E, Pantaleo MA, Patel S, Piperno-Neumann S, Raut CP, Ravi V, Razak ARA, Reichardt P, Rubin BP, Rutkowski P, Safwat AA, Sangalli C, Sapisochin G, Sbaraglia M, Scheipl S, Schöffski P, Strauss D, Strauss SJ, Sundby Hall K, Tap WD, Trama A, Tweddle A, van der Graaf WTA, Van De Sande MAJ, Van Houdt W, van Oortmerssen G, Wagner AJ, Wartenberg M, Wood J, Zaffaroni N, Zimmermann C, Casali PG, Dei Tos AP, Gronchi A. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, an ultra-rare cancer: a consensus paper from the community of experts. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100170. [PMID: 34090171 PMCID: PMC8182432 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, translocated, vascular sarcoma. EHE clinical behavior is variable, ranging from that of a low-grade malignancy to that of a high-grade sarcoma and it is marked by a high propensity for systemic involvement. No active systemic agents are currently approved specifically for EHE, which is typically refractory to the antitumor drugs used in sarcomas. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy for EHE patients and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of the disease make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for many EHE patients. To address the shortcoming, a global consensus meeting was organized in December 2020 under the umbrella of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) involving >80 experts from several disciplines from Europe, North America and Asia, together with a patient representative from the EHE Group, a global, disease-specific patient advocacy group, and Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN). The meeting was aimed at defining, by consensus, evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to primary and metastatic EHE. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication. This consensus paper provides key recommendations on the management of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE). Recommendations followed a consensus meeting between experts and a representative of the EHE advocacy group and SPAEN. Authorship includes a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions from Europe, North America and Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stacchiotti
- Adult Mesenchymal Tumor and Rare Cancer Unit, Cancer Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - A B Miah
- The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A M Frezza
- Adult Mesenchymal Tumor and Rare Cancer Unit, Cancer Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - C Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Morosi
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - A Caraceni
- Palliative Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - C R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - J Bajpai
- Medical Oncology Department, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - E Baldini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Center/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - S Bauer
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Sarcoma Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - R Biagini
- Orthopaedic Department, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - S Bielack
- Klinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Pädiatrische Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - J Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Unicancer, Lyon, France
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | | | - J V M G Bovee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Boye
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Brodowicz
- Medical University Vienna & General Hospital Department of Internal Medicine 1/Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Callegaro
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - E De Alava
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBiS), Virgen del Rocio University Hospital/CSIC/University of Sevilla/CIBERONC, Seville, Spain; Department of Normal and Pathological Cytology and Histology, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Unicancer, Lyon, France
| | - M Eriksson
- Department of Oncology, Skane University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - C Errani
- Orthopaedic Service, Musculoskeletal Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Fedenko
- Medical Oncology Division, P.A. Herzen Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - V Ferraresi
- Sarcomas and Rare Tumors Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - A Ferrari
- Paediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - C D M Fletcher
- Department of Pathology Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - X Garcia Del Muro
- University of Barcelona and Genitourinary Cancer and Sarcoma Unit Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R A Gladdy
- University of Toronto and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Surgery, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - G Grignani
- Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - J Gutkovich
- The EHE Foundation, Wisconsin, USA; NUY Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - R Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - N Hindi
- Group of Advanced Therapies and Biomarkers in Sarcoma, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Seville, Spain
| | - P Hohenberger
- Division of Surgical Oncology & Thoracic Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Huang
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - H Joensuu
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital & Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R L Jones
- Department of Cancer, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Jungels
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Kasper
- University of Heidelberg, Mannheim University Medical Center, Sarcoma Unit, Mannheim, Germany
| | - A Kawai
- Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rare Cancer Center National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Le Cesne
- International Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - F Le Grange
- UCLH - University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Leithner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - H Leonard
- Chair of Trustees of the EHE Rare Cancer Charity (UK), Charity number 1162472
| | - A Lopez Pousa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Martin Broto
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Merimsky
- Unit of Soft Tissue and Bone Oncology, Division of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - P Merriam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - R Miceli
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organisation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - O Mir
- Sarcoma Group, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Molinari
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Thomas Starzl Transplant Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | - G Oldani
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E Palmerini
- Chemotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - M A Pantaleo
- Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Patel
- Sarcoma Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - C P Raut
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA; Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Dana Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - V Ravi
- Sarcoma Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A R A Razak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Sinai Healthcare System & Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P Reichardt
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Berlin, Germany
| | - B P Rubin
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - P Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A A Safwat
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - C Sangalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - G Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant and HPB Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Sbaraglia
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - S Scheipl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - D Strauss
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S J Strauss
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Sundby Hall
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - W D Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - A Trama
- Department of Research, Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - A Tweddle
- Palliative Care, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research London
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A J Van De Sande
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Unit, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W Van Houdt
- Sarcoma and Melanoma Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G van Oortmerssen
- Co-Chair of Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN), Woelfersheim, Germany & Chairman of the Dutch organisation for sarcoma patients (Patiëntenplatform Sarcomen), Guest researcher at Leiden University (Leiden Institute for Advanced Computer Science), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A J Wagner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Wartenberg
- Chair of the Board of Directors of Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN), Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN), Woelfersheim, Germany
| | - J Wood
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Zaffaroni
- Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - C Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P G Casali
- Adult Mesenchymal Tumor and Rare Cancer Unit, Cancer Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - A P Dei Tos
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - A Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Glasbey JC, Bundred J, Tyler R, Hunt J, Tattersall H, Gourevitch D, Almond LM, Desai AD, Ford SJ. The impact of postoperative radiological surveillance intensity on disease free and overall survival from primary retroperitoneal, abdominal and pelvic soft-tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1771-1777. [PMID: 33549374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of intensity of radiological surveillance on survival following resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma. METHOD Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary resection of soft tissue sarcoma arising in the retroperitoneum, abdomen or pelvis at a single, high-volume sarcoma centre. Intensity of follow-up regimes up to 5 postoperative years were categorized as 'European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) compliant' (intense), or 'non-ESMO compliant' (less-intense). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and reoperation rate. Analyses were stratified by high (grade 2 or 3) or low (grade 1) tumour grade. RESULTS Of 168 patients, 67.1% had high-grade and 32.9% had low-grade disease. Overall, 40.0% of patients had ESMO-compliant radiological follow-up (high-grade:25.7%, low-grade:66.7%). 41.7% of patients died and 48.2% suffered local or distant recurrence by cessation of follow up. Upon univariable analysis for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliance reduced DFS (p = 0.066) but had no impact on OS. There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate in patients with ESMO-compliant and non-compliant follow-up (p = 0.097). In low-grade tumours, ESMO compliance significantly reduced DFS (p < 0.001), but without effecting OS. In risk-adjusted models for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliant follow-up was associated with reduced OS (HR:3.47, 1.40-8.61, p = 0.007) and no difference in DFS. In low-grade tumours, there was no association between overall ESMO compliance and OS or DFS. CONCLUSION This study did not find a benefit for high-intensity radiological surveillance and overall survival in patients undergoing primary resection for high or low-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Glasbey
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - J Bundred
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - R Tyler
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - J Hunt
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - H Tattersall
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - D Gourevitch
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - L M Almond
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - A D Desai
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - S J Ford
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Candidate Biomarkers for Specific Intraoperative Near-Infrared Imaging of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030557. [PMID: 33535618 PMCID: PMC7867119 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Near-infrared imaging of tumors during surgery facilitates the oncologic surgeon to distinguish malignant from healthy tissue. The technique is based on fluorescent tracers binding to tumor biomarkers on malignant cells. Currently, there are no clinically available fluorescent tracers that specifically target soft tissue sarcomas. This review searched the literature to find candidate biomarkers for soft tissue sarcomas, based on clinically used therapeutic antibodies. The search revealed 7 biomarkers: TEM1, VEGFR-1, EGFR, VEGFR-2, IGF-1R, PDGFRα, and CD40. These biomarkers are abundantly present on soft tissue sarcoma tumor cells and are already being targeted with humanized monoclonal antibodies. The conjugation of these antibodies with a fluorescent dye will yield in specific tracers for image-guided surgery of soft tissue sarcomas to improve the success rates of tumor resections. Abstract Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The curative treatment highly depends on complete tumor resection, as positive margins are associated with local recurrence (LR) and prognosis. However, determining the tumor margin during surgery is challenging. Real-time tumor-specific imaging can facilitate complete resection by visualizing tumor tissue during surgery. Unfortunately, STS specific tracers are presently not clinically available. In this review, STS-associated cell surface-expressed biomarkers, which are currently already clinically targeted with monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic purposes, are evaluated for their use in near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of STS. Clinically targeted biomarkers in STS were extracted from clinical trial registers and a PubMed search was performed. Data on biomarker characteristics, sample size, percentage of biomarker-positive STS samples, pattern of biomarker expression, biomarker internalization features, and previous applications of the biomarker in imaging were extracted. The biomarkers were ranked utilizing a previously described scoring system. Eleven cell surface-expressed biomarkers were identified from which 7 were selected as potential biomarkers for NIRF imaging: TEM1, VEGFR-1, EGFR, VEGFR-2, IGF-1R, PDGFRα, and CD40. Promising biomarkers in common and aggressive STS subtypes are TEM1 for myxofibrosarcoma, TEM1, and PDGFRα for undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma and EGFR for synovial sarcoma.
Collapse
|
20
|
Besseling J, Reitsma J, Van Erkelens JA, Schepens MHJ, Siroen MPC, Ziedses des Plantes CMP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Beerepoot LV, Van Voorthuizen T, Van Zuylen L, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven H. Use of Palliative Chemotherapy and ICU Admissions in Gastric and Esophageal Cancer Patients in the Last Phase of Life: A Nationwide Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13010145. [PMID: 33466279 PMCID: PMC7794997 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This is the first nationwide study on chemotherapy use and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the last three months before death in patients with cancer of the stomach or esophagus. Chemotherapy use and ICU admission shortly before death were relatively infrequent in the Netherlands. Chemotherapy was used less often in hospitals that treat many patients compared to hospitals that treat fewer patients. In patients that received chemotherapy before their final three months before death, chemotherapy was prescribed four times more often in the last three months before death compared to patients without previous chemotherapy use. Abstract Since intensive care unit (ICU) admission and chemotherapy use near death impair the quality of life, we studied the prevalence of both and their correlation with hospital volume in incurable gastroesophageal cancer patients as both impair the quality of life. We analyzed all Dutch patients with incurable gastroesophageal cancer who died in 2017–2018. National insurance claims data were used to determine the prevalence of ICU admission and chemotherapy use (stratified on previous chemotherapy treatment) at three and one month(s) before death. We calculated correlations between hospital volume (i.e., the number of included patients per hospital) and both outcomes. We included 3748 patients (mean age: 71.4 years; 71.4% male). The prevalence of ICU admission and chemotherapy use were, respectively, 5.6% and 21.2% at three months and 4.2% and 8.0% at one month before death. Chemotherapy use at three and one months before death was, respectively, 4.3 times (48.0% vs. 11.2%) and 3.7 times higher (15.7% vs. 4.3%), comparing patients with previous chemotherapy treatment to those without. Hospital volume was negatively correlated with chemotherapy use in the final month (rweighted = −0.23, p = 0.04). ICU admission and chemotherapy use were relatively infrequent. Oncologists in high-volume hospitals may be better equipped in selecting patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost Besseling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.V.Z.); (R.H.A.V.)
- Correspondence: (J.B.); (H.v.L.); Tel.: +31-(0)-682046266 (J.B.); +31-(0)-20-44-44321 (H.v.L.); Fax: +31-(0)-20-44-44355 (H.v.L.)
| | - Jan Reitsma
- Zorgverzekeraars Nederland, 3708 JE Zeist, The Netherlands; (J.R.); (M.H.J.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | | | | | - Lia Van Zuylen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.V.Z.); (R.H.A.V.)
| | - Rob H. A. Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.V.Z.); (R.H.A.V.)
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.V.Z.); (R.H.A.V.)
- Correspondence: (J.B.); (H.v.L.); Tel.: +31-(0)-682046266 (J.B.); +31-(0)-20-44-44321 (H.v.L.); Fax: +31-(0)-20-44-44355 (H.v.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Time Trends and Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Myxoid Liposarcomas: A Population-Based Study. Sarcoma 2020; 2020:2437850. [PMID: 33029074 PMCID: PMC7528038 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2437850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and associated characteristics for patients with Myxoid Liposarcoma (MLS) over time in The Netherlands. Methods A population-based study was performed of patients with primary localized (n = 851) and metastatic (n = 50) MLS diagnosed in The Netherlands between 1989 and 2016, based on data from the National Cancer Registry. Results The median age of the MLS patients was 49 years, and approximately two-thirds was located in the lower limb. An association was revealed between age and the risk of having a Round Cell (RC) tumor. OS rates for primary localized MLS were 93%, 83%, 78%, and 66% after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The median OS for patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis was 10 months. Increasing age (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.05, p=0.00), a tumor size >5 cm (HR 2.18; p=0.00), and tumor location (trunk HR 1.29; p=0.09, upper limb HR 0.83; p=0.55, and “other” locations HR 2.73; p=0.00, as compared to lower limb) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The percentage of patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) increased over time, and preoperative RT gradually replaced postoperative RT. In contrast to patients with localized disease, significant improvement of OS was observed in patients with metastatic disease over time. Conclusions In this large nationwide cohort, tumor size and tumor location were independent prognostic factors for OS. Furthermore, a higher probability of an RC tumor with increasing age was suggested. An increased use of RT over the years did not translate into improved OS for localized MLS.
Collapse
|
22
|
Koseła-Paterczyk H, Spałek M, Borkowska A, Teterycz P, Wągrodzki M, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Morysiński T, Castaneda-Wysocka P, Cieszanowski A, Zdzienicki M, Goryń T, Rutkowski P. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Myxoid Liposarcomas of Extremities or Trunk Wall: Results of a Single-Arm Prospective Clinical Trial. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082471. [PMID: 32752185 PMCID: PMC7464815 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) has been reported to be more radiosensitive compared with other soft tissue sarcomas. The main objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in the preoperative setting in patients with locally advanced primary MLPS. Methods: Single-arm prospective exploratory clinical trial enrolled MLPS patients for preoperative 5 × 5 Gy RT with delayed surgery. The endpoints of the study were the rate of early wound healing complications and 5-year local control rate. Results: 29 patients (pts) were included, all had tumors located on the lower limb. The median maximum size of the tumor was 13 cm (IQR 10–15 cm). Early RT tolerance was good. Postoperative wound complications occurred in 11 pts (37.9%), late complications concerned 13.8% of patients. A total of 27 patients were included for the efficacy analyses. The pathological features of response to RT were detected in all analyzed surgical specimens. In 25 patients R0 margins were achieved, two patients had an R1 resection. None of the patients had local recurrence. Conclusion: Preoperative hypofractionated RT with a prolonged gap between RT and surgery is a feasible method of the management of MLPS, providing a good local control and low rates of treatment toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Michał Wągrodzki
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (A.S.-C.)
| | - Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (A.S.-C.)
- Diagnostic Hematology Department, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Morysiński
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Patrycja Castaneda-Wysocka
- Department of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.C.-W.); (A.C.)
| | - Andrzej Cieszanowski
- Department of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.C.-W.); (A.C.)
| | - Marcin Zdzienicki
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Tomasz Goryń
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lazarides AL, Cerullo M, Moris D, Brigman BE, Blazer DG, Eward WC. Defining a textbook surgical outcome for patients undergoing surgical resection of intermediate and high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:884-896. [PMID: 32691847 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality measures for the surgical management soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity are limited. The purpose of this study was to define a textbook surgical outcome (TO) for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (STS-E) and to examine its associations with hospital volume and overall survival. METHODS All patients in the National Cancer Database undergoing resection of primary STS-E between 2004 and 2015 were identified. The primary outcome was a TO, defined as: hospital length of stay (LOS) <75th percentile, survival >90 days from the date of surgery, no readmission within 30 days of discharge, and negative surgical margins (R0 resection). RESULTS Overall, 7658 patients met criteria for inclusion; a TO was achieved in 4291 (56%) patients. Of patients who did not achieve TOs, 51.9% (n = 1748) had an extended LOS, and 47.3% (n = 1591) did not have negative margins. Older age, more medical comorbidities, and non-white or black race were independently associated with not receiving a TO (P = .034). With respect to tumor and treatment characteristics, larger tumor size, lower extremity location and higher grade were independently associated with not receiving a TO (P < .001). Hospital volume was not associated with a TO. TOs conferred a significant survival benefit (hazrds ratio = 0.71 [0.65-0.78], P < .001). A TO was associated with a 27.5% longer survival time (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS This study defined a TO in intermediate and high-grade STS-E and demonstrated that this outcome measure is associated with overall survival. Facility volume was not associated with a TO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcelo Cerullo
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.,National Clinician Scholars Program, Duke University and Veterans Health Administration, Durham, NC
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian E Brigman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William C Eward
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|