First-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status

Survival benefit and potential markers of chemotherapy for elderly and poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results from the Japanese Joint Committee of lung cancer registry database

INTRODUCTION

Data on chemotherapy for elderly, poor performance status (PS) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are clinically important but insufficient due to their exclusion from most interventional studies. This study aims to explore actual treatment status and prognosis, as well as factors predicting patients who may benefit from chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years with PS 2-3 and no/unknown driver mutations were included. In each of PS2 and PS3 cohorts, we compared the overall survival (OS) of the chemotherapy and Best Supportive Care (BSC) group after adjusting by inverse probability weighting (IPW) method, and analyzed prognostic factors using the COX proportional hazards model. We defined the patients with body weight loss ≥5 % within 6 months as cancer cachexia in this study.

RESULTS

This study included 282 patients (Chemotherapy;107, BSC;175) in PS2 cohort and 230 patients (Chemotherapy;39, BSC;191) in PS3 cohort. In both PS2 and PS3 cohorts, IPW-adjusted OS was significantly longer in the chemotherapy group than in the BSC group (HR 0.42 [95 % CI 0.32-0.55] and 0.56 [95 % CI 0.41-0.75], p < 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer cachexia and stage IV were significantly associated with OS in PS2 cohort. For patients with cancer cachexia in PS3 cohort, chemotherapy did not prolong OS (HR 0.81 [95 % CI 0.45-1.45], p = 0.530).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy might provide a survival benefit even for elderly, poor PS NSCLC patients. In vulnerable PS 3 patients, cancer cachexia may be useful in predicting patients who may benefit from chemotherapy.

First-line pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression: real-world data from a Spanish multicenter study

Introduction

Pembrolizumab stands as a first-line option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 ≥50%). Several factors such as antibiotic exposure, low body mass index (BMI), certain metastatic location or poor performance status may influence outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in a cohort of patients with advanced high PD-L1 expression NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab in clinical practice. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes according to several factors.

Results

Among the 494 included patients, median age was 67.29 years, 77% were male, 54% and 38% were former or current smokers, respectively; 84% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0-1, and 48% had a BMI of <25. 32% of patients had bone metastases, 32% brain metastases and 16% liver metastases. 35% of patients had exposure to antibiotics (AB), 44% to corticosteroids and 62% to proton pump inhibitors (PPi). With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 15.9m (95% CI 13.1 to 18.8) and 9.9m (95% CI 7.7 to 12.1), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 43%. After univariate analysis, median OS in patients with ECOG-PS 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 was 36.7m vs. 14.8m vs. 2.7m (p<0.001). Median OS in patients who received treatment with corticosteroids vs. patients without exposure was 11.4m vs. 22.3m (p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, corticosteroid exposure (HR 1.41) and ECOG-PS (HR 2.40) maintained a prognostic impact.

Discussion

First-line pembrolizumab outcomes in advanced high PD-L1 expression NSCLC patients could be negatively influenced by corticosteroid exposure or poor ECOG-PS.

Development, Validation, and Clinical Utility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Enhanced Prediction Models for Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy

PURPOSE

Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are increasingly collected routinely in clinical practice and may be prognostic for survival in adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in addition to clinical data. This study developed ePROM-enhanced models for predicting 1-year overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC at the start of immunotherapy.

METHODS

This is a single-center study using consecutive patients from a tertiary cancer hospital in England. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we developed one clinical factor-only model and three ePROM-enhanced models, each including one of the following factors: quality of life (as measured by EuroQoL five-dimension five-level utility score) and overall symptom burden and number of moderate-to-severe symptoms (as measured by patient-reported version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Predictive performance was evaluated and compared through bootstrapping internal validation, and clinical utility was determined via decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The clinical factor-only model contained age, histology, performance status, and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio. While calibration was similar between the clinical factor-only and ePROM-enhanced models, the latter showed improved discrimination by 0.020 (95% CI, 0.011 to 0.024), 0.024 (95% CI, 0.016 to 0.031), and 0.024 (95% CI, 0.014 to 0.029) when enhanced with ePROMs on quality of life, overall symptom burden, and number of moderate-to-severe symptoms, respectively. If care decisions are to be made at risk thresholds between 25% and 75%, the ePROM-enhanced models led to higher net benefit than the clinical factor-only model and the default strategies of intervention for all and intervention for none.

CONCLUSION

The ePROM-enhanced models outperformed the clinical factor-only model in predicting 1-year overall survival for patients with advanced NSCLC receiving immunotherapy and showed potential clinical utility for informing decisions in this population. Future studies should focus on validating the models in external data sets.

Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Modified Delphi Survey Consensus on First Line Treatment, Special Populations and Rechallenge

Background: The treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved significantly with the advent of immunotherapy. Nonetheless, uncertainty regarding optimal first-line treatments, special populations, and the feasibility of rechallenge remains. This study aims to investigate Italian oncologists' opinions on these aspects through a Delphi Survey. Methods: A steering committee (SC) of six oncologists identified three topics of interest, namely NSCLC (first line) therapeutic choice, NSCLC special populations, and NSCLC immunotherapy rechallenge), and drafted several topic-related statements to be voted in the Delphi Survey by the 61 oncologists forming the Delphi Panel. The survey included two rounds, wherein the experts rated their agreement/disagreement with the statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as agreement/disagreement by at least 75% of the panel. Results: The SC drafted 69 statements for the first round, of which 16 (23.2%) met the agreement threshold, 5 (7.2%) met the disagreement threshold, and 48 (69.6%) did not reach consensus. The SC revised the latter statements and drafted 37 for the second round. Overall, 5 (13.5%) statements met the agreement threshold, 1 (2.7%) met the disagreement threshold, and 31 (83.8%) did not reach consensus in the second round. Conclusions: The survey showed agreement on the necessity of molecular characterization, mutations, smoke, the role of steroid therapy, and immunotherapy rechallenge, and revealed several areas of uncertainty among Italian oncologists on the use of immunotherapy in NSCLC. Statements-where consensus was not met-can be used to guide future clinical research in resolving the issues.

Checkpoint based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand 1 (PD-L1) has radically changed the management of many types of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many clinical trials have demonstrated that ICIs improve the survival and the quality of life of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC as compared to standard therapies. However, not all patients achieve a clinical benefit from this immunotherapeutic approach. As a result, real-word validation of the efficacy and safety of ICIs can be useful for defining potential predictive biomarkers as well as for overcoming limitations linked to clinical trial restrictions.

Methods

We retrospectively retrieved the clinical data of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC treated with ICIs (anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1) as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy at "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona" University Hospital from January 2016 to December 2023. Potential correlations between clinical-pathological characteristics and safety or survival outcomes were investigated employing the Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis method and log-rank test, as applicable. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Clinical data of 129 patients were retrieved. At a median follow-up of 29.70 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.27 months and 8.43 months, respectively. At the multivariate analyses, smoking status, presence of bone metastases and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were correlated with both PFS and OS. Moreover, patients treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy achieved an increased clinical benefit than those treated with anti-PD-L1.

Discussion

In this study we described our real-world experience of ICIs for the treatment of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC. A decreased OS in our study population was reported as compared to that of patients included in the clinical trials. Noteworthy, correlations between clinical-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes emerged. Nevertheless, the potential integration of clinical-pathological characteristics as predictive biomarkers in more accurate therapeutic algorithms as well as the underlying biological mechanisms should be further validated in ad hoc studies.

Survival prognostic factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with simultaneous brain metastases and poor performance status at initial presentation

Purpose

Although the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly progressed recently, there is little evidence of treatment for patients with symptomatic brain metastases (BM) and poor performance status (PS). However, in symptomatic BM patients, appropriate upfront intracranial treatment can often lead to rapid improvement in PS and effective systemic therapy. Thus, this study investigated the prognostic factors for the survival of poor PS NSCLC patients with synchronous BM.

Methods

Data of patients with BM and Karnofsky PS (KPS) ≤70 at the first diagnosis of NSCLC who were treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. Patient survival was compared among patients stratified by type of first-line regimen of systemic treatment. Correlations between patient characteristics and survival were examined.

Results

Fifty patients receiving aggressive treatment were enrolled. The median survival times for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and chemotherapy alone groups were 19 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.8-68.5), 19 (3.0-62.0), and 13 (1.2-24.8) months, respectively. Survival in the TKI and ICI groups was significantly longer than in the chemotherapy alone group (p = 0.046, TKI vs. chemo; p = 0.022, ICI vs. chemo; p = 0.023). Both sex and type of systemic treatment correlated to survival time on univariate analysis. Chemotherapy alone for systemic treatment [p = 0.034; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 (0.20-0.94)] remained significant for predicting overall survival in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Even in patients with poor PS and BM at the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, the ICI group had a survival time comparable to that of the TKI group when combined with tailor-made intracranial treatment. There is a subgroup in the patient population that was previously considered unsuitable for ICI, whose PS improves with individualized intracranial treatment, and who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Under-Represented by Clinical Trials

Since the initial US FDA approval of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for the treatment of non-oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) nine years ago, this therapeutic strategy has been cemented as a crucial component of treatment for most of these patients. However, there is a clear efficacy-effectiveness gap whereby patients in the 'real world' seem to have more modest clinical outcomes compared to those enrolled in landmark clinical trials. This gap may be driven by the under-representation of important patient populations, including populations defined by clinical or molecular characteristics. In this review, we summarize the data outlining the evidence of ICIs in patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), underlying autoimmune disease (AID), older age, active brain metastases (BMs), and molecular aberrations such as EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, BRAF mutations and ROS1 fusions.

Do corticosteroids affect immunotherapy efficacy in malignancy? - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Early studies indicated that corticosteroids may limit the survival benefit from immunotherapy. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the effect corticosteroids have on immunotherapy in patients with malignancy, when adjusted for potentially confounding effects of corticosteroids given for palliative indications.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Medline) were searched on 1 February 2023. Studies that measured response or survival to immunotherapy in people receiving corticosteroids for non-cancer indications compared to either no corticosteroids or corticosteroids for cancer-related indications were included. Studies exclusively evaluating the effect of corticosteroids administered for immune-related adverse events (irAE) were excluded to avoid immortal time bias. Pooled odds and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Egger's regression model.

RESULTS

Eight thousand four hundred and twenty-six titles were identified on our search. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Administration of corticosteroids does not have a statistically significant effect on survival and response to immunotherapy when administered for non-cancer-related indications, with a pooled odds ratio for overall response rate 1.01 (95% CI 0.64-1.60); pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival 0.87 (95% CI 0.68-1.12); and pooled HR for overall survival 0.79 (95% CI 0.59-1.05).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review indicates that administration of corticosteroids does not affect response to immunotherapy nor survival outcomes, when removing confounding palliative corticosteroid indications. These results are limited by the retrospective nature of the studies included, small sample sizes, lack of information about corticosteroid dosing and the inclusion of irAE in two of the studies which could bias the results.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy survival benefits in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review of real-world data

The efficacy of pembrolizumab in the treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was proved in the KEYNOTE-024 randomized trial. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify and summarize the real world evidence (RWE) of overall survival (OS) in previously untreated patients with NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE®) and EMBASE databases. Analyses were focused on survival data (median OS and survival rates at specific time points). To explore the population comparable with the KEYNOTE-024 study, we focused on studies enrolling at least 50% of patients at stage IV of cancer and ECOG performance status 0-2. A total of 41 RWE studies covering over 7600 advanced NSCLC patients naïve to systemic treatment were identified. Overall, survival outcomes reported in those studies vary considerably (median OS range: 3.0-34.6 months). Most RWE studies reported median OS shorter to that reported in KEYNOTE-024 (26.3 months), but about half of reported OS medians were in range of 95% confidence interval for OS as reported in KEYNOTE-024 trial (18.3-40.4 months). Patients with similar characteristics of stage and performance status to those of KEYNOTE-024 trial benefited the same with pembrolizumab monotherapy as their survival outcomes (18.9-22.8 months) were consistent with those reported in the clinical trial. RWE data showed substantially worse outcomes in patients with ECOG-PS 2+ compared to ECOG-PS 0-1 patients.

Immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC in real-world settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) represent the mainstay for the approval of new treatments. However, stringent inclusion criteria often cause them to depart from the daily clinical practice. Real-world (RW) evidence have a complementing role, filling the gap between the efficacy of a treatment and its effectiveness. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment scenario for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); immune-related adverse events (irAEs) could become life-threatening events, when not timely managed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the RW impact of irAEs through the years.

Methods

The systematic review focused on irAEs occurred in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients, treated with ICIs in a RW setting. We queried two electronic databases (Embase and Medline) from 1996 to August 2022. We then conducted a meta-analysis dividing the results in two cohorts (2015-2018 and 2019-2021). We described the prevalence of patients with irAEs of any or severe grade (G). Estimates were expressed as proportions up to the second decimal point (effect size, ES). IrAEs of interest were those involving the skin, the liver, the endocrine system or the gastro-intestinal system.

Results

Overall, 21 RW studies on 5,439 patients were included in the quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The prevalence of G≥3 irAEs was slightly lower in the 2015-2018 subgroup, while the prevalence of irAEs of any grade was similar for both periods. Overall, we observed a higher ES for gastrointestinal, hepatic and lung irAEs, while a lower ES was reported for skin or endocrine irAEs. Endocrine irAEs were reported in 10 out of 21 studies, with a slight increase in the most recent studies, while cutaneous toxicities were mostly reported in two studies lead within the first time-period. Pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hepatic toxicities, showed a more heterogeneous distribution of ES over time.

Discussion

Our findings showed that the frequency of irAEs remained stable across the two calendar periods examined in our meta-analysis. This finding suggests that RW data might not be able to identify a potential learning curve in detection and management of irAEs.

The performance status gap in immunotherapy for frail patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy is often preferred over intensive ICI treatment for frail patients and those with poor performance status (PS). Among those with poor PS, the additional effect of frailty on treatment selection and mortality is unknown.

METHODS

Patients in the veterans affairs national precision oncology program from 1/2019-12/2021 who received first-line ICI for advanced NSCLC were followed until death or study end 6/2022. Association of an electronic frailty index with treatment selection was examined using logistic regression stratified by PS. We also examined overall survival (OS) on intensive treatment using Cox regression stratified by PS. Intensive treatment was defined as concurrent use of platinum-doublet chemotherapy and/or dual checkpoint blockade and non-intensive as ICI monotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 1547 patients receiving any ICI, 66.2% were frail, 33.8% had poor PS (≥ 2), and 25.8% were both. Frail patients received less intensive treatment than non-frail patients in both PS subgroups (Good PS: odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 - 0.88; Poor PS: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 - 1.10). Among 731 patients receiving intensive treatment, frailty was associated with lower OS for those with good PS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.96), but no association was observed with poor PS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.67 - 1.58).

CONCLUSION

Frail patients with both good and poor PS received less intensive treatment. However, frailty has a limited effect on survival among those with poor PS. These findings suggest that PS, not frailty, drives survival on intensive treatment.

Clinical Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unique Cohorts Underrepresented in Clinical Trials

Regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was based on results of large, randomized clinical trials, resulting in limited outcomes data in patient cohorts typically underrepresented in such trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in these unique patient cohorts. This is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of real-world data at six academic and community clinics in the United States from 1 January 2011 to 1 April 2018. Patients were included if they had received at least one cycle of ICI treatment. Unique patient cohorts included age > 75 years, non-White race, positive smoking history, ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, autoimmune diseases (AIDs), chronic viral infections (CVI), extensive prior lines of therapy (LOTs), or >three metastatic sites. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure were evaluated in the entire cohort and in NSCLC patients treated with PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Outcomes and their association with unique patient cohorts were compared on univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to those without a particular characteristic in the entire NSCLC PD-(L)1 monotherapy cohorts. In total, 1453 patients were included: 56.5%-smokers, 30.4%-non-White, 22.8%-elderly, 20.8%-ECOG PS ≥ 2, 15.7%-history of AIDs, and 4.7%-history of CVI. The common ICIs were nivolumab (37.1%) and pembrolizumab (22.2%). Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer irAEs (OR 0.54, p < 0.001). An ECOG PS of ≥2 (HR = 2.01, p < 0.001) and an increased number of previous LOTs were associated with poor OS (the median OS of 26.2 vs. 16.2 vs. 9.6 months for one vs. two vs. three prior LOTs, p < 0.001). The above results were confirmed in anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy non-small cell lung cancer patients (n = 384). Overall, ICIs were safe and efficacious in these typically underrepresented patient cohorts. We noted ECOG PS ≥ 2 and an increased prior LOTs were associated with poor ICI efficacy, and Black patients, compared to White patients, experienced fewer irAEs.

Comparison of baseline patient characteristics in Italian oncology drug monitoring registries and clinical trials: a real-world cross-sectional study

Background

Generalizability of registrative clinical trials to real-world clinical practice is influenced by comparability of patients in the two settings. We compared characteristics of cancer patients in registrative trials with real-world clinical practice in Italy.

Methods

Data on age, sex and performance status (PS) were derived from web-based monitoring registries developed by Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and corresponding registrative trials reported in the European Public Assessment Reports (EPAR) of European Medicines Agency (EMA). Weighted means were calculated in registries and trials and differences were described. Multivariate analysis was performed using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis.

Findings

From January, 2013 to April, 2023, 419,461 unique pairs of patients and therapeutic indications were recorded in 129 AIFA registries. Within 140 related trials, 87,452 patients had been enrolled. Median age and rate of elderly (≥65 years old) patients were higher in monitoring registries than in clinical trials [mean difference of median age 5.3 years, p < 0.001; mean difference of elderly rate 17.17% (95% CI 1.06, 1.48)]. Overall, rate of female patients was not different between registries and trials [mean difference -0.55% (95% CI -1.06, -0.05)]. Mean rate of patients with deteriorated PS was low both in trials (3.1%) and in registries (4.3%) with a mean difference of 1.27% (95% CI 1.06, 1.48). Two clusters were identified with multivariate analysis: one including more registries (higher median age and elderly rate, lower female rate, higher rate of deteriorated patients), the other more trials (lower median age and elderly rate, higher female rate, lower rate of deteriorated patients).

Interpretation

This study supports that cancer patients enrolled in trials do only partially represent those who have been treated in Italy in clinical practice. Inclusiveness of registrative trials should be increased to ensure generalizability of results to real-world population.

Funding

Partially supported by Italian Ministry of Health.

Real-World Safety and Outcome of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Metastatic NSCLC with PDL-1 Expression ≥ 50%: A National Italian Multicentric Cohort ("PEMBROREAL" Study)

Results from the phase III Keynote-024 clinical trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC who have PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, EGFR, and ALK wild-type tumors. However, given the differences between patients treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in a clinical trial, real-world data are needed to confirm the treatment benefit in standard practice. Given the lack of data on large cohorts of patients with long follow-ups, we designed an observational retrospective study of patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab, starting from its reimbursement eligibility until December 2020. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS, determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response and safety were also evaluated. We followed 880 patients (median follow-up: 35.1 months) until February 2022. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.0) and 25.5 months (95% CI: 21.8-31.6), respectively. We also found that ECOG PS, PD-L1 expression, and habitual smoking were prognostic factors for PFS, while age, sex, ECOG PS, habitual smoking and histology had an impact on OS. Multivariable analysis confirms the prognostic role of PD-L1 for PFS and of ECOG for both PFS and OS. 39.9% of patients reported an adverse event, but only 6.3% of patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Our results suggest a long-term benefit of pembrolizumab in the first-line setting, as well as a safety profile consistent with the results of Keynote-024. Many collected variables appear to influence clinical outcome, but results from these exploratory unadjusted analyses should be interpreted with caution.

Real-World Data and Evidence in Lung Cancer: A Review of Recent Developments

Conventional cancer clinical trials can be time-consuming and expensive, often yielding results with limited applicability to real-world scenarios and presenting challenges for patient participation. Real-world data (RWD) studies offer a promising solution to address evidence gaps and provide essential information about the effects of cancer treatments in real-world settings. The distinction between RWD and data derived from randomized clinical trials lies in the method of data collection, as RWD by definition are obtained at the point of care. Experimental designs resembling those used in traditional clinical trials can be utilized to generate RWD, thus offering multiple benefits including increased efficiency and a more equitable balance between internal and external validity. Real-world data can be utilized in the field of pharmacovigilance to facilitate the understanding of disease progression and to formulate external control groups. By utilizing prospectively collected RWD, it is feasible to conduct pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) that can provide evidence to support randomized study designs and extend clinical research to the patient's point of care. To ensure the quality of real-world studies, it is crucial to implement auditable data abstraction methods and develop new incentives to capture clinically relevant data electronically at the point of care. The treatment landscape is constantly evolving, with the integration of front-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, affecting subsequent treatment lines. Real-world effectiveness and safety in underrepresented populations, such as the elderly and patients with poor performance status (PS), hepatitis, or human immunodeficiency virus, are still largely unexplored. Similarly, the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of these innovative agents are important considerations in the real world.

Afatinib treatment of severe respiratory failure due to malignant lymphangitis in a dialysis patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

Patients on dialysis have limited treatment options for advanced lung cancer because some chemotherapeutic agents are unavailable due to renal dysfunction. A man in his 70s on peritoneal dialysis presented with persistent fever refractory to antibiotics for 2 weeks. Subsequent whole-body CT showed a 5 cm diameter mass in the right lower lobe of the lung with right-sided pleural effusion and osteolytic metastasis of the right iliac bone. The patient was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (cT3N2M1b, stage IVB) harbouring the p.Gly719Ala point mutation on exon 18 of the epidermal growth factor receptor. The patient developed severe respiratory failure due to malignant lymphangitis after a bronchoscopy. He received 30 mg/day of afatinib, resulting in tumour shrinkage and recovery from respiratory failure. We advocate for aggressive screening of driver oncogenes in patients with lung cancer on dialysis, including those with squamous cell lung cancer.

Clinical characteristics of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: CS-Lung-003 prospective observational registry study

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are ineffective against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients who were treated or not treated with ICIs, and of those who benefit from immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with unresectable stage III/IV or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations using a prospective umbrella-type lung cancer registry (CS-Lung-003).

RESULTS

A total of 303 patients who met the eligibility criteria were analyzed. The median age was 69 years; 116 patients were male, 289 had adenocarcinoma, 273 had major mutations, and 67 were treated with ICIs. The duration of EGFR-TKI treatment was longer in the Non-ICI group than in the ICI group (17.1 vs. 12.7 months, p < 0.001). Patients who received ICIs for more than 6 months were categorized into the durable clinical benefit (DCB) group (24 patients), and those who received ICIs for less than 6 months into the Non-DCB group (43 patients). The overall survival in the DCB group exhibited longer than the Non-DCB group (69.3 vs. 47.1 months), and an equivalent compared to that in the Non-ICI group (69.3 vs. 68.9 months). Multivariate analysis for time to next treatment (TTNT) of ICIs showed that a poor PS was associated with a shorter TTNT [hazard ratio (HR) 3.309; p < 0.001]. Patients who were treated with ICIs and chemotherapy combination were associated with a longer TTNT (HR 0.389; p = 0.003). In addition, minor EGFR mutation was associated with a long TTNT (HR 0.450; p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

ICIs were administered to only 22% of patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and they had shorter TTNT of EGFR-TKI compared to other patients. ICI treatment should be avoided in EGFR mutated lung cancer with poor PS but can be considered for lung cancer with EGFR minor mutations. Pathological biomarker to predict long-term responders to ICI are needed.

Radiation and resolve: unlocking the synergistic potential of radioimmunotherapy in advanced lung cancer management

Plain language summary This editorial talks about combining radiation therapy (using high-energy rays to kill cancer cells) and immunotherapy (boosting the body's immune system to fight cancer) to treat advanced lung cancer. When used together, these therapies can work better to kill more cancer cells and help patients live longer. But, there's still a lot we don't know. For instance, we need to figure out the best timing and doses for these treatments, and which patients will benefit the most. The article stresses that more research is needed to answer these questions and make this combined treatment a more effective option for advanced lung cancer patients.

Face to face among different chemo-immunotherapy combinations in the first line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of an international expert panel meeting by the italian association of thoracic oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard of care option in the front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Positive efficacy and safety results have been demonstrated with different chemo-ICI combinations in the corresponding clinical trials, however no randomized prospective comparison is available and there is no evidence on how to choose among the available regimens.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2023 to review data on chemo-ICI regimens available in the first-line setting in patients with NSCLC, and reach common considerations both in clinical practice and in research setting.

RESULTS

Overall, all panelists agreed that safety of the chemo-immunotherapy combination regimens is supported by reviewed data, showing no additional toxicity concerns over those of the individual components of each regimen and highlighting differences in toxicity profile based on ICI component (single anti-PD-1 versus double anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4). Among disease characteristics, PD-L1 value (<1%) but not histology was considered a potential selection factor in favor of the combination with dual ICI. With regards to clinical features, the panelists agreed that chemotherapy, whichever the ICI combination regimen, remains the backbone to counteract disease-related symptoms included those conditioning worse performance status. The panelists defined high, medium, and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to prospectively evaluating the impact of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 on brain metastasis, biomarker subgroups, and the optimal duration and schedule of combination regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, the panelists reached common considerations on strengths and differences between chemotherapy plus single agent ICI and chemotherapy plus double agent ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. In the absence of direct comparison, different toxicity profile and subgroup analysis by PD-L1 are considered as the main potential features to select among the two regimens, however to be confirmed by recommended prospective randomized clinical research.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of RC48-ADC alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Previous RC48 (Disitamab Vedotin) studies established that the safety and efficacy of RC48-antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), either alone or combined with toripalimab, for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients exhibiting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or even HER2-negative status after standard chemotherapy failure.

METHODS

With locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), patients who received RC48-ADC monotherapy or a combination with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors between August 2021 and October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study to evaluate the real-world antitumor effectiveness and safety.

RESULTS

Among the 38 enrolled patients (29 males; median age 67.5 years [38-93]), 8 received RC48-ADC monotherapy, while 30 received combination therapy. Initially, 63.2% (24/38) of the patients had received ≥1 line of prior treatment, and 63.2% (24/38) had visceral metastasis. UC of the bladder represented the majority type in 68.4% (26/38) of cases. By the data cutoff in March 2023, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 63.2% (95% CI, 47.1%-79.2%), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 89.5% (95% CI, 79.3%-99.7%). Median follow-up time was 10.6 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.5), with a 6-month PFS rate of 63.2% and a 12-month PFS rate of 34.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 12-month OS rate of 76.7%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-10.0) among 24 patients evaluated as partial response (PR). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included anemia (71.1%), anorexia (57.9%), asthenia (52.6%), hypoesthesia (52.6%), bone marrow suppression (47.4%), alopecia (47.4%), nausea (44.7%), proteinuria (36.8%), vomiting (34.2%), and hypoalbuminemia (31.6%). No patient experienced TRAEs of Grade ≥3. One patient had an immune-related adverse event (irAE) of rash related to toripalimab.

CONCLUSIONS

Both as monotherapy and in combination with PD-1 inhibitors, RC48-ADC exhibits promising effectiveness and manageable safety profile for mUC patients in real-world settings.

Combination of immunotherapy, radiotherapy and denosumab as the best approach even for NSCLC poor prognosis patients: a case report with strong response, prolonged survival and a review of literature

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastasis and poor performance status has the worst prognosis even in strong PD-L1 expression patients. Treatment approach includes immuno- or chemo-immunotherapy, Radiotherapy (RT) and Bone-Targeted Therapy (BTT) but there is insufficient data to suggest the best time to use each of them, alone or in combination. Using an integrated and synergistic treatment strategy with immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and Denosumab as BTT is probably the best treatment planning for metastatic NSCLC for both good and poor performance status patients, although more data are needed to confirm this approach. Here we describe an interesting case report on patient with extensive bone involvement from NSCLC and PS >2 treated simultaneously with radiotherapy, immunotherapy and BTT, achieving an excellent clinical benefit, radiological and metabolic complete response, as a sort of Lazarus effect. We analyzed our result comparing with currently published data about radio-immunotherapy or immunotherapy and BTT combination even though there is no published experience about integration of all 3 treatments. Approval studies often do not represent real-world experience (RWE), so we analyzed data from both RWE and clinical trials.

Impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Baseline corticosteroids exposure is associated with inferior clinical outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) axis blockade. Dexamethasone is a potent corticosteroid used in the prevention of chemotherapy-associated adverse events (CAAEs).

OBJECTIVE

Since dexamethasone has immunosuppressive properties, this study attempted to elucidate its effects on the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 254 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who received front-line treatment with a PD-1 pathway inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy at three academic institutions. The average dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone per chemotherapy cycle was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the dose of dexamethasone: High-d (≥24 mg), Moderate-d (12-24 mg), and Low-d (<12 mg). Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between the dosage of dexamethasone and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between dexamethasone dosage and the occurrence of immune related adverse effects (irAE). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the differences in survival among the different dexamethasone dosage groups.

RESULT

The dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone was not significantly correlated with PFS (Spearman's rho = -0.103, P = 0.098). Results from the univariate [hazard ratio (HR)Low-d/High-d, 1.00; P = 0.997; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.85; P = 0.438] and multivariate (HRLow-d/High-d, 0.71; P = 0.174; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.87; P = 0.512) analyses showed no significant association between dexamethasone and PFS. Dexamethasone did not have significant effect on the objective response rate, disease control rate or overall survival. The toxicity profiles of irAE were similar across all three groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the use of prophylactic dexamethasone does not have an adverse effect on the clinical outcomes of non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade therapy and chemotherapy. Routine use of dexamethasone for preventing CAAEs should be recommended for patients undergoing combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

The landscape of immune therapy in vulnerable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to substantial advances in the treatment of lung cancer. In particular, the contribution of ICIs to the long-term survival of certain patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. With the accumulated experience in the use of ICIs, numerous studies have documented the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with diverse backgrounds, including those with problematic indications for drug therapy. In the current review, we summarize the most recent literature-based findings on ICI administration in vulnerable patients with NSCLC and provide an overview of the current status and prospects of ICIs.

METHODS

Herein, we defined vulnerable as the group of patients with NSCLC and performance status (PS) ≥2 (poor PS), advanced age (≥75 years), or cancer cachexia. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in vulnerable patients with advanced NSCLC.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Among the vulnerable patient group, poor PS was a strong, poor prognostic factor, even in patients undergoing ICI therapy. ICI therapy in older patients can be effective, although adverse events (AEs) should be carefully monitored. The efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer cachexia is poor, with further therapeutic development warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Although prior studies have evaluated lung cancer pharmacotherapy in various vulnerable populations, clinical studies on the application of ICIs in patients with vulnerable NSCLC are lacking in both number and quality. Further development of these therapeutic agents, with the emergence of additional evidence regarding their appropriate use in this population, is expected.

Effects of glucocorticoid use on survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide, with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the majority of cases. Patients with NSCLC have achieved great survival benefits from immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently used for palliation of cancer-associated symptoms, as supportive care for non-cancer-associated symptoms, and for management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and prognostic significance of glucocorticoid use in advanced patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

The study searched publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database up to March 1st, 2022, and conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effects of glucocorticoid use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs through the available data. The study calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

This study included data from 25 literatures that were mainly retrospective, with 8713 patients included. Patients taking GCs had a higher risk for tumor progression and death compared with those not taking GCs (PFS: HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33-1.86, P <0.001; OS: HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.41-1.88, P <0.001). GCs used for cancer-associated symptoms caused an obviously negative effect on both PFS and OS (PFS: HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29, P <0.001; OS: HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.52-2.04, P <0.001). However, GCs used for irAEs management did not negatively affect prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-1.00, P = 0.050; OS: HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.83, P = 0.005), and GCs used for non-cancer-associated indications had no effect on prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.63-1.32, P = 0.640; OS: HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.59-1.41, P = 0.680).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, the use of GCs for palliation of cancer-associated symptoms may result in a worse PFS and OS, indicating that they increase the risk of tumor progression and death. But, in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, the use of GCs for the management of irAEs may be safe, and the use of GCs for the treatment of non-cancer-associated symptoms may not affect the ICIs' survival benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to be careful and evaluate indications rationally before administering GCs in individualized clinical management.

Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Expression: Focus on the Role of Performance Status

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy are approved first-line treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing high levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, appropriate treatment for patients showing high PD-L1 expression and poor performance status (PS) is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify a treatment option that is better for these patients in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 425 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression were included retrospectively. All patients received either pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were subdivided into good (PS score 0 or 1; n = 354) and poor PS groups (PS score 2 or 3; n = 71). Early progressive disease (PD) was defined as PD within 3 months of ICI-based therapy initiation.

RESULTS

The good PS group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the poor PS group upon ICI-based therapy administration. In the poor PS group, no significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy. In the good PS group, pembrolizumab monotherapy, PD-L1 50-89%, and liver metastasis were associated with early PD, as determined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. However, in the poor PS group, the multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between pembrolizumab monotherapy and early PD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NSCLC exhibiting poor PS and high PD-L1 expression, ICI plus chemotherapy did not confer PFS or OS benefit compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Exposome: Host-Extrinsic Factors Determine Response, Survival, and Toxicity

Cancer immunotherapy, largely represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has led to substantial changes in preclinical cancer research and clinical oncology practice over the past decade. However, the efficacy and toxicity profiles of ICIs remain highly variable among patients, with only a fraction achieving a significant benefit. New combination therapeutic strategies are being investigated, and the search for novel predictive biomarkers is ongoing, mainly focusing on tumor- and host-intrinsic components. Less attention has been directed to all the external, potentially modifiable factors that compose the exposome, including diet and lifestyle, infections, vaccinations, and concomitant medications, that could affect the immune system response and its activity against cancer cells. We hereby provide a review of the available clinical evidence elucidating the impact of host-extrinsic factors on ICI response and toxicity.

Role of Surgical Pathologist for the Detection of Immuno-oncologic Predictive Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers

Until very recently, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have been the mainstay of treatment in non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLCs). However, recent advances in molecular immunology have unveiled some of the complexity of the mechanisms regulating cellular immune responses and led to the successful targeting of immune checkpoints in attempts to enhance antitumor T-cell responses. Immune checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4, programmed cell death protein-1, and programmed death ligand (PD-L) 1 have been shown to play central roles in evading cancer immunity. Thus, these molecules have been targeted by inhibitors for the management of cancers forming the basis of immunotherapy. Advanced NSCLC has been the paradigm for the benefits of immunotherapy in any cancer. Treatment decisions are made based on the expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cells and the presence or absence of driver mutations. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and no driver mutations are treated with single-agent immunotherapy whereas, for all other patients with a lower level of PD-L1 expression, a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy is preferred. Thus, PD-L1 blockers are the only immunotherapeutic agents approved in advanced NSCLC without any oncogenic driver mutations. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, however, may not be the best biomarker in view of its dynamic nature in time and space, and the benefits may be seen regardless of PD -L1 expression. Each immunotherapy molecule is prescribed based on the levels of PD-L1 expression as assessed by a Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic assay. Other biomarkers that have been studied include tumor mutational burden, the T-effector signature, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, radiomic assays, inflammation index, presence or absence of immune-related adverse events and specific driver mutations, and gut as well as local microbiome. At the current time, none of these biomarkers are routinely used in the clinical decision-making process for immunotherapy in NSCLC. However, in individual cases, they can be useful adjuncts to conventional therapy. This review describes our current understanding of the role of biomarkers as predictors of response to immune checkpoint molecules. To begin with a brief on cancer immunology in general and in NSCLC, in particular, is discussed. In the end, recent advancements in laboratory techniques for refining biomarker assays are described.

Impact of Performance Status on Survival Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Introduction

Landmark trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC are difficult to extrapolate to real-world practice given the exclusion of patients with poor (i.e., ≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). We sought to evaluate the impact of ECOG PS on clinical outcomes and health care utilization in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs in real-world practice.

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab were retrospectively identified from the Alberta Immunotherapy Database. The primary outcome was median overall survival, as stratified by ECOG PS. Secondary outcomes included median time-to-treatment failure and metrics of health care utilization, including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death in hospital.

Results

A total of 790 patients were included, with 29.2% having poor ECOG PS at initiation of ICI. These patients had significantly lower median overall survival (3.3 versus 13.4 mo) and median time-to-treatment failure (1.4 versus 4.9 mo) compared with those with favorable ECOG PS (p < 0.0001 for both outcomes). Patients with poor ECOG PS were also more likely to present to the emergency department, be admitted to the hospital, and die in the hospital during their first admission (risk ratio = 1.6, 2.3-2.7, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with NSCLC with poor ECOG PS treated with ICI had significantly worse survival outcomes and were significantly more likely to use health care services than those with favorable ECOG PS. The large proportion of patients with poor ECOG PS further justifies the urgent need for randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of ICI in this high-risk population.

Only EBUS-Guided Mediastinal Lymph Node Cryobiopsy Enabled Immunotherapy in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Personalized treatment of metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires detailed molecular characterization of the tumour including detection of predictive driver mutations and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Complete detection is influenced by the amount of tumour cells sampled as well as their quality. Different sampling techniques may be necessary to provide sufficient tumour material for comprehensive molecular characterization. Missing the detection of targetable molecular genetic aberrations would have a serious impact on the quality of life and prognosis of a patient. This case report highlights the importance of biopsy technique in a patient with NSCLC. Several procedures—pleural puncture, transthoracic lung biopsy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)—could not provide sufficient tumour material for precise tumour characterization. Only the addition of EBUS-guided transbronchial lymph node cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBLNC) enabled complete immunohistochemical and genetic tumour characterization, demonstrating PD-L1 expression in 100% of the tumour cells in the absence of actionable genetic alterations. Based on these results, immunotherapy was initiated.

Improving the performance status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with chemotherapy (ImPACt trial): a phase 2 study

PURPOSE

This phase II trial is designed to test whether the performance status (PS) of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients (pts) can improve with chemotherapy if their poor PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of ≥ 2) is due to disease burden rather than comorbidities.

METHODS

Age18-65 years, Charlson's comorbidity index < 9, serum albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl, adequate bone marrow and organ function, & ECOG PS ≥ 2 as judged by the worst score of three independent physicians were administered 3 doses of weekly paclitaxel at 60 mg/m²/dose. The primary endpoint was an improvement in ECOG PS by 1 point at 4 weeks; others: toxicity (CTCAE v 5.0), quality of life (QoL) assessment at baseline and 4 weeks by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13. Optimal Simon's 2-stage design was used.

RESULTS

 Forty-six patients were included with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, IQR 54-59), 12 (26%) had comorbid conditions, and 87% with ECOG PS 3/4. PS improved in 11 pts at 4 weeks and in 7 beyond this time point. Grade 3/4 toxicities are seen in 20% (most common: anemia and diarrhea). At a median follow-up of 4.8 m (95% CI 3.27-14.9), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.3 months (95% CI 2.36-5.6) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.47-8.8), respectively. QoL improved for global QoL, role functioning, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, pain in the chest, pain in other parts, and worsened for alopecia and sore mouth.

CONCLUSIONS

 Abbreviated chemotherapy is a useful, well-tolerated strategy in carefully selected poor PS mNSCLC patients that can improve PS and QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL

Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/01/022617.

Effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in real-world studies and randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed the favorable clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, considering the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical research, there are certain differences between patients in the real-world, it is unclear whether the findings of clinical trials are fully representative of the treatment efficacy in patients who will eventually use it. Therefore, to further comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in NSCLC, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the latest RCTs and real-world studies (RWSs).

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, The Web of Science, and clinical trials.gov as of December 2021. RCTs and RWSs of patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC were included.

Results

The meta-analysis ultimately included 11 RCTs and 26 RWSs with a total of 10,695 patients. The primary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), serious adverse events (SAEs), the incidence of severe pneumonia reactions, and drug-related mortality. Direct meta-analysis results showed that in RCTs, pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy in terms of OS (HR=0.60, 95%CI:0.50-0.73), PFS (HR=0.47, 95%CI:0.38-0.58) and ORR (OR=3.22, 95%CI:2.57-4.03); pembrolizumab monotherapy was superior to chemotherapy in terms of OS (HR=0.73, 95%CI:0.66-0.80) and ORR (OR=1.90, 95%CI:1.17-3.09), but comparable to chemotherapy in terms of PFS (HR=0.83, 95%CI:0.66-1.04). The ORR values in retrospective single-arm studies were 45% (40%-51%).

Conclusion

In RCTs, pembrolizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy is more effective and safer than chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. In RWSs, ECOG PS 0-1 was shown to correlate with PFS and OS for patients with NSCLC.

Frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor performance status

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy (ICI-based combination) is a new standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the frontline setting. Patients with poor performance status (PS) (≥2) were excluded from pivotal trials. Hence, the activity and safety of ICI-based combination therapy in this group of patients is still unknown.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre retrospective study of PS ≥2 mRCC patients who received frontline ICI-based combination, either nivolumab-ipilimumab (NI) or pembrolizumab-axitinib (AP). Patients' characteristics, clinical outcomes, and toxicity were collected. We analysed overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS) and grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AEs). The association between the predictive biomarker IPI (immune prognostic index) and ORR/PFS/OS was also evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 70 mRCC patients with PS ≥2 treated with ICI-based combination across 14 institutions between October 2017 and December 2021, including 45 and 25 patients were treated with NI and AP, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years, 51 (73%) were male, only 17 (24%) had prior nephrectomy, 50 (71%) had synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 16 (23%) had brain metastases. Sixty-one (87%) and 9 (13%) patients had ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) PS 2 and 3, respectively, and 25 (36%) and 45 (64%) patients were intermediate and poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, respectively. Among all, 91% were clear cell RCC, 7 patients had sarcomatoid features. At the time of the analysis (median follow-up 11.1 months), 41% patients were dead. Median PFS and mOS in the entire cohort were 5.4 months and 16.0 months, respectively; ORR was 31%. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS, or G ≥3AEs were seen between NI and AP. The intermediate and poor IPI groups were significantly associated with reduced ORR and shorter PFS.

CONCLUSION

We report the first cohort of PS ≥2 mRCC patients treated with frontline ICI-based combination therapy. The survival outcomes in our cohort were inferior to that reported in pivotal trials. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS or toxicity were seen between NI and AP. Prospective real-world studies are needed to confirm these results.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, including patients with ECOG performance status 2 and other special populations: CheckMate 817

BACKGROUND

CheckMate 817, a phase 3B study, evaluated flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, in this research, we report on first-line treatment in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1 (cohort A) and special populations (cohort A1: ECOG PS 2; or ECOG PS 0-1 with untreated brain metastases, renal impairment, hepatic impairment, or controlled HIV infection).

METHODS

Cohorts A and A1 received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-4 and grade 5 immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs; adverse events (AEs) deemed potentially immune-related, occurring <100 days of last dose, and treated with immune-modulating medication (except endocrine events)) and treatment-related select AEs (treatment-related AEs with potential immunological etiology requiring frequent monitoring/intervention, reported between first dose and 30 days after the last dose) in cohort A; efficacy endpoints were secondary/exploratory. In cohort A1, safety/efficacy assessment was exploratory.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3-4 IMAEs were pneumonitis (5.1%), diarrhea/colitis (4.9%), and hepatitis (4.6%) in cohort A (N=391) and diarrhea/colitis (3.5%), hepatitis (3.5%), and rash (3.0%) in cohort A1 (N=198). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related select AEs were hepatic (5.9%), gastrointestinal (4.9%), and pulmonary (4.6%) events in cohort A and gastrointestinal (4.0%), skin (3.5%), and endocrine (3.0%) events in cohort A1. No grade 5 IMAEs or treatment-related select AEs occurred. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 (1.0%) and 3 (1.5%) patients in cohorts A and A1, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.7% and 20.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab was associated with manageable safety and durable efficacy in cohort A, consistent with data from phase 3 metastatic NSCLC studies. Special populations of cohort A1 including patients with ECOG PS 2 or ECOG PS 0-1 with untreated brain metastases had manageable treatment-related toxicity and clinically meaningful 3-year OS rate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02869789.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in a Real-World Population with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

ICIs have been able to improve overall survival in advanced-stage lung cancer. The benefit of this therapy is limited in patients with poor ECOG PS. However, this scale is imprecise and can be influenced by different factors, such as frailty. Cancer patients have a high risk of frailty independently of age. In this observational, single-center, retrospective study, we investigated the effect of frailty on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in first-line use in a cohort of 101 patients with metastatic NSCLC. Frailty was determined using a frailty score system developed by Sakakida et al. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic role of frailty on OS and PFS. Median OS was significantly higher in patients with low frailty compared with intermediate and high frailty (23.8 vs. 7.0 and 1.8 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Median PFS was also significantly higher in patients with low frailty compared with intermediate and high frailty (10.5 vs. 3.9 and 1.6 months; p < 0.001, respectively). Frailty was the only variable that showed significant differences in OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis confirms frailty as an independent predictor of OS and PFS. Frailty assessment could help to select which patients are candidates for ICIs in NSCLC.

Real-world multicentre cohort of first-line pembrolizumab alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer PD-L1 ≥ 50

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab alone (IO-mono) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT-IO) is first-line standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. This retrospective multicentre study assessed real-world use and efficacy of both strategies.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% from eight hospitals who had received at least one cycle of IO-mono or CT-IO were included. Overall survival (OS) and real-word progression-free-survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and a Cox model with inverse propensity treatment weighting was carried out.

RESULTS

Among the 243 patients included, 141 (58%) received IO-mono and 102 (42%) CT-IO. Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (95% CI 10.4-13.3), median OS was not reached, but no difference was observed between groups (p = 0.51). Early deaths at 12 weeks were 11% (95% CI 4.6-16.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.0-20.9) in CT-IO and IO groups (p = 0.32). After adjustment for age, gender, performance status, histology, brain metastases, liver metastases and tobacco status, no statistically significant difference was found for OS between groups, neither in the multivariate adjusted model [HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.61-1.86), p = 0.8] nor in propensity adjusted analysis [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.65), p = 0.99]. Male gender (HR 2.01, p = 0.01) and PS ≥ 2 (HR 3.28, p < 0.001) were found to be negative independent predictive factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. However, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line does not appear to impact survival outcomes, even regarding early deaths.

Assessing Potential Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Radiation in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Recent evidence suggests that combining radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may result in better outcomes. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ICI plus radiation versus ICI alone and explored potential factors affecting its efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

The databases including PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve eligible studies comparing the efficacy and safety outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients after ICIs ± RT treatments. We performed subgroup analyses to identify potential prognostic factors from radiation details and study types. The odds ratio (OR) of objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events were used to represent the outcome effects.

Results

26 eligible studies with 14192 cases were included. The results showed that the ORR (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.93; p = 0.02) and DCR (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.82; p < 0.01) of RT + ICIs groups were significantly higher than those of the ICIs alone group. The median PFS and OS for ICIs versus RT + ICIs were 2.2 versus 4.4 months and 9.0 versus 13.4 months, respectively. Patients in the ICIs plus RT group had a significantly better PFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.81; p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.83; p < 0.01) when compared to those in the ICIs group. In terms of adverse events, the risk of pneumonia was not significantly increased in patients treated with both ICIs and RT when compared to ICIs group alone (risk ratio = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.44; p = 0.63). The correlation analysis found that PFS was significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis results showed that significant improvements in OS were observed in non-palliative RT group (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.65; p < 0.01) and extracranial RT group (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.83; p < 0.01). RT type could also be a prognostic factor associated with the OS (for conventional RT: HR = 0.68 and p = 0.22; for stereotactic body radiation therapy: HR = 0.77 and p < 0.01). However, concerning RT timing, the results showed a similar trend in reducing mortality risk (for previous RT: HR = 0.64 and p = 0.21; for concurrent RT: HR = 0.35 and p = 0.16).

Conclusion

RT plus ICIs is associated with improved survival for advanced NSCLC patients, especially for those with non-palliative RT. Further clinical trials are needed to validate its effect on survival outcomes.

Predictors of survival to immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive poor benefit from immunotherapy (IO). For some of them, adding chemotherapy (CT) can improve the outcomes, but the reliability of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as the only biomarker to distinguish these patients is unsatisfactory. We sought to detect clinicopathological and molecular predictive factors of survival that might be added to PD-L1 expression in the selection of patients who should receive IO alone or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled clinical trials investigating IO, alone or with CT, vs CT alone in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate IO alone vs CT, CIT vs CT, and IO alone vs CIT.

RESULTS

A total of 14 367 patients with advanced NSCLC across 25 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Squamous histology, male sex, current and former smoker status, PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival with IO alone compared with CT. Conversely, female sex, no smoking history, negative PD-L1 expression, and low TMB correlated with unsatisfactory outcomes with IO alone vs CT but not with CIT vs CT. CIT improved survival vs IO alone in female patients, never smokers, those having a PD-L1 expression of 1% or more (but not with a PD-L1 of  ≥ 50%) or a low TMB and in patients with central nervous system metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest some clinicopathological and molecular features that, added to PD-L1 expression, could help in the selection of the most appropriate first-line IO-based treatment for advanced NSCLC patients.

Impact of Infections in Patients Receiving Pembrolizumab-Based Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has significantly improved outcomes across a range of malignancies. While infections are a well-known contributor to morbidity and mortality amongst patients receiving systemic chemotherapy regimens, little is known about the impact of infections on patients receiving ICI therapy. This study aims to assess incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in patients who develop infections while on pembrolizumab-based therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients receiving pembrolizumab for stage III/IV NSCLC from 1/1/2017-8/1/2021 across seven hospitals were identified. Incidence and type of infection were characterized. Covariates including baseline demographics, treatment information, treatment toxicities, and immunosuppressive use were collected and compared between infected and non-infected patients. Outcomes included the rate of infections, all-cause hospital admissions, median number of treatment cycles, overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS). Univariable and multivariable analysis with reported odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized to evaluate infection risks. OS and PFS were analyzed by Kaplan−Meier analysis and tested by log-rank test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were 243 NSCLC patients that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 111 (45.7%) had one documented infection, and 36 (14.8%) had two or more. Compared to non-infected patients, infected patients had significantly more all-cause Emergency Department (ED) [37 (33.3%) vs. 26 (19.7%), p = 0.016], hospital [87 (78.4%) vs. 53 (40.1%), p < 0.001], and ICU visits [26 (23.4%) vs. 5 (3.8%), p < 0.001], and had poorer median OS (11.53 [95% CI 6.4−16.7] vs. 21.03 [95% CI: 14.7−24.2] months, p = 0.033). On multivariable analysis, anti-infective therapy (OR 3.32, [95% CI: 1.26−8.76], p = 0.015) and ECOG of >1 (OR 5.79, [95% CI 1.72−19.47], p = 0.005) at ICI initiation conferred an increased risk for infections. At last evaluation, 74 (66.7%) infected and 70 (53.0%) non-infected patients died (p = 0.041). Conclusion: Infections occurred in nearly half of patients receiving pembrolizumab-based therapies for NSCLC. Infected patients had frequent hospitalizations, treatment delays, and poorer survival. ECOG status and anti-infective use at ICI initiation conferred a higher infection risk. Infection prevention and control strategies are needed to ameliorate the risk for infections in patients receiving ICIs.

Incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated cardiovascular toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a novel class of anti-cancer therapy becoming increasingly associated with fatal cardiovascular toxicities (CVTs). The aim is to determine the incidence of CVTs in cohorts treated with ICIs as sole anti-cancer therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of scientific and medical databases was performed using PRISMA principles to identify relevant cohorts (PROSPERO registration CRD42021272470). Data for specific CVTs (pericardial disease, myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction/ischaemia and angina), CVT-related death and CV risk factors were extracted. Presence of CVTs in ICI-monotherapy versus combination-ICI therapy, and programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1- (PD1/PDL1-) versus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4- (CTLA4-) inhibitor groups were dichotomised and meta-analysed using random-effect models.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies (11,207 patients) were identified, from which 146 CVTs were observed (incidence 1.30%). ICI-monotherapy led to more CVTs than combination therapy (119/9009; 1.32% vs. 18/2086; 0.86%). Across monotherapies, PD1/PDL1-inhibitors had lower incidence of CVTs compared to CTLA4-inhibitors (62/6950; 0.89% vs. 57/2059; 2.77%). Based on eight studies that were meta-analysed, no significant difference was observed comparing monotherapy versus combination-ICI therapy (RR-0.69, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.09) for all CVTs, or PD1/PDL1- to CTLA4-inhibitors (RR-0.27, 95% CI -2.06 to 1.53), for all CVTs including CVT-death. CV risk factors could not be attributed to an ICI group as data was population based rather than individual based.

CONCLUSION

ICI-mediated CVTs are rare and potentially fatal. The role of CV risk factors in their development remains unclear.

The Palliative Prognostic (PaP) Score without Clinical Evaluation Predicts Early Mortality among Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

Background: An acceptable risk-benefit ratio may encourage the prescription of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) near the late stage of life. The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was validated in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with ICIs. The palliative prognostic (PaP) score without clinical prediction of survival (PaPwCPS) predicts early mortality probability in terminal cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 182 deceased advanced NSCLC patients, treated with single-agent ICI at our Institution. Two prognostic categories of high and low mortality risk were identified through ROC curve analysis for PaPwCPS and LIPI scores. Results: Most were >65 years of age (68.3%) and received second-line ICI (61.2%). A total of 29 (15.9%) and 131 (72.0%) patients died within 30 and 90 days from treatment start, respectively. A total of 81 patients (44.5%) received ICI during the last month of life. Baseline PaPwCPS and LIPI scores were assessable for 78 patients. The AUC of ROC curves was significantly increased for PaPwCPS as compared with LIPI score for both 30-day and 90-day mortality. A high PaPwCPS score was associated in multivariate analysis with increased 30-day (HR 2.69, p = 0.037) and 90-day (HR 4.01, p < 0.001) mortality risk. A high LIPI score was associated with increased 90-day mortality risk (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We found a tendency towards ICI prescription near the late stage of life. The PaPwCPS score was a reliable predictor of 30- and 90-day mortality.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy for untreated PD-L1-Positive non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly or those with poor performance status: A prospective observational study

Objectives

We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) and elderly patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also investigated clinical prognostic factors for the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy, based on patient characteristics.

Materials and methods

In this prospective observational study, PS-2 and elderly NSCLC patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, from October 2019 to March 2021, at 10 institutions in Japan were enrolled. Patients judged eligible by their physicians for combined chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment were excluded. Clinicopathological characteristics and adverse events were investigated for correlation with clinical outcomes.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with PS 2 and those aged ≥ 75 years were 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9–14.4) months and 5.3 (95% CI 2.9–9.4) months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with PS 2 and those aged ≥ 75 years were 11.6 (95% CI: 1.4–not evaluable [NE]) months and 11.6 (95% CI 7.4–18.1) months, respectively. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 19 patients; 6 patients had severe irAEs of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or higher. Patients who achieved stable disease or better, had a statistically significant increase in PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the acquisition of disease control with pembrolizumab monotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS.

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab monotherapy was relatively effective and tolerable as a first-line treatment for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced NSCLC who had poor PS or were elderly. Our results suggest that disease control might be an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS in this population. (UMIN000044052 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050176)

Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Response and Prognosis in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To investigate the association between pretreatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and clinical survival outcomes for advanced-stage cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify eligible studies concerning the relationship between pretreatment PNI and survival outcomes in advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs. Published data were extracted and pooled odds ratio (pOR) for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and pooled hazard ratio (pHR) for overall survival (OS), progressive-free survival (PFS), along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

Results

Twelve studies with 1,359 participants were included in our study. A higher level of PNI indicated a greater ORR (pOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.52–3.10) and favorable DCR (pOR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.87–3.29). Low PNI was associated with a shorter OS (pHR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.57–3.20) and unfavorable PFS (pHR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.37–1.88).

Conclusion

Low PNI might be an effective biomarker of poor tumor response and adverse prognosis of advanced cancer patients with ICIs. Further studies are needed to verify the prognostic value of PNI in clinical practice.

Bone-specific response according to MDA criteria predicts immunotherapy efficacy among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

PURPOSE

The presence of bone metastasis at baseline has been associated with dismal prognosis under immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria may be limited for bone-specific response evaluation. Whether their assessment through MD Anderson (MDA) criteria predict immunotherapy efficacy is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study to assess the use of MDA criteria in evaluating bone metastasis in NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. Radiological imaging were reviewed to classify bone lesions as osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed. Bone response to treatment data was classified according to MDA criteria.

RESULTS

222 patients received single-agent immunotherapy. The presence of bone metastasis increased the risk of death both in the univariate (HR: 1.46, 95% CI, 1.05-2.03, p = 0.024) and in the multivariate model (HR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.10-2.36, p = 0.015). According to MDA criteria, 57.3% of patients had progressive disease as best response, 29.5% stable disease, 11.4% partial response and 1.6% complete response. Bone-specific objective response was associated with a significantly increased median overall survival (11.3 vs. 3.1 months, p = 0.027) and longer median progression-free survival (6 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.056). The median time to bone failure (TBF) was 2.4 months (IQR, 1.67-3.0). In 25.7% of cases, TBF was shorter than progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. TBF was positively correlated with overall survival (HR = 0.73, p = 0.00019).

CONCLUSIONS

MDA criteria represent a reliable tool in assessing bone-specific response, offering a more accurate evaluation with the aim to earlier predict survival outcomes or treatment failure compared to RECIST criteria for advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Combination of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy With Anti-PD-1 in Oligoprogressive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer And Melanoma: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

Introduction The percentage of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma who benefit from anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) is low due to resistance mechanisms. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has a role in oligoprogressive disease and can improve responses to anti-PD-1. This multicenter prospective observational study aims to determine whether concomitant anti-PD-1 and SABR to oligoprogressive sites enhance tumor response in metastatic NSCLC and melanoma. Methods Patients with metastatic NSCLC or melanoma in progression to anti-PD-1 but continuing the same line due to clinical benefit were referred for palliative SABR. All patients received concomitant pembrolizumab or nivolumab and SABR to 1-5 lesions, maintaining anti-PD-1 until further progression, unacceptable toxicity, or medical/patient decision. Objective response rate (ORR)-complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR) -was evaluated during all follow-up following RECIST1.1. The abscopal response (AR) was evaluated 8 weeks after SABR as a ≥30% reduction in 1-2 predefined non-irradiated lesions. Results Of the 61 patients enrolled, 50 could be analyzed. With a median follow-up of 32.8 months, ORR was 42% (30% CR and 12% PR). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% CI, 6.9-29 months). Median overall survival since SABR was 37.4 months (95% CI, 22.9 months-not reached). AR was 65%, evaluated in 40 patients who fulfilled the criteria. Conclusions Combined anti-PD-1 and SABR in oligoprogressive metastatic NSCLC or melanoma can achieve high rates of response and extend the clinical benefit of immunotherapy by delaying further progression and a new systemic therapy. This approach should be assessed in larger randomized trials.

Baseline Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Assessment May Help Predict Survival in Lung Cancer Patients-A Prospective Cardio-Oncology Study

Cardiovascular disease and cancer coexist and lead to exertional dyspnea. The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of cardiac comorbidities, ECG and baseline echocardiography in lung cancer patients with varying degrees of reduced performance status. This prospective study included 104 patients with histopathologically confirmed lung cancer, pre-qualified for systemic treatment due to metastatic or locally advanced malignancy but not eligible for thoracic surgery. The patients underwent a comprehensive cardio-oncological evaluation. Overall survival negative predictors included low ECOG 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status, stage IV (bone or liver/adrenal metastases in particular), pleural effusion, the use of analgesics and among cardiac factors, two ECG parameters: atrial fibrillation (HR = 2.39) and heart rate >90/min (HR = 1.67). Among echocardiographic parameters, RVSP > 39 mmHg was a negative predictor (HR = 2.01), while RVSP < 21 mmHg and RV free wall strain < −30% were positive predictors (HR = 0.36 and HR = 0.56, respectively), whereas RV GLS < −25.5% had a borderline significance (HR = 0.59; p = 0.05). Logistical regression analysis showed ECOG = 2 significantly correlated with the following echocardiographic parameters: increasing RVSP, RV GLS, RV free wall strain and decreasing ACT, FAC (p < 0.05). Selected echocardiographic parameters may be helpful in predicting poor performance in lung cancer patients and, supplemented with ECG evaluation, broaden the possibilities of prognostic evaluation.

Inhibitors of PD-1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Molecular Features

Objective

PD-1 inhibitors have become an indispensable treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), but the potential predictive value of clinical and molecular features need to be clarified. The objective of the study was to study the potency of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with NSCLC in contexts of both clinical and molecular features, and to aid identification of patients for choice of type of PD-1 inhibitor therapy in order to acquire more accurate NSCLC treatment in immunotherapy.

Method

PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase Science Direct, the Cochrane library, and major oncology conferences were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that were published prior to December 2021. RCTs that had PD-1 inhibitor alone or in combination with chemotherapy with non-PD-1 inhibitor for the treatment of NSCLC patients were selected. Two authors independently selected studies, data extraction and bias risk assessment. Basic characteristics of included studies, and also the 95% confidence interval and hazard ratios of the overall patients and subgroups were recorded. The inverse variance weighted method was used to estimate pooled treatment data.

Result

A total of eleven RCTs including 5,887 patients were involved. PD-1 inhibitors-based therapy substantially enhanced OS compared with non-PD-1 inhibitor therapy in patients with age group <65 years, 65-74 years, active or previous smokers, without brain metastases, liver metastases, EGFR wild-type patients, individuals in East Asia and U.S./Canada, but not in patients with age group ≥75 years, never smokers, brain metastases, EGFR mutant patients or individuals in Europe. OS was improved in patients with NSCLC who received PD-1 inhibitors regardless of their gender (male or female), histomorphological subtypes (squamous or non-squamous NSCLC), performance status (0 or 1), and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) (<1%, ≥1%, 1-49%, or ≥50%). An analysis of subgroups revealed that, patients with age group <65 years old, male, non squamous cell carcinoma, PS 1, TPS ≥1%, and TPS ≥50% benefited from pembrolizumab treatment not related with treatment line and treatment regimen.

Conclusion

Age group, smoking history, metastasis status/site, EGFR mutation status, and region can be used to predict the potency of PD-1 inhibitors, and to be individualized to choose different types of PD-1 inhibitors, and treatment regimen for NSCLC patients.

Immunotherapy Versus Hospice: Treatment Decision-Making in the Modern Era of Novel Cancer Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Modern advances in cancer treatment with immunotherapy have created substantial hope for patients and oncologists alike due to a new possibility of durable response which can verge on "cure." This, in combination with a more favorable toxicity profile, has led many oncologists to consider immunotherapy for patients who might have previously been recommended for hospice. In this narrative review, we discuss (1) the risks and benefits of immunotherapy in patients with far advanced cancer in the last months of life, (2) the role of supportive and palliative care, and (3) how to navigate complex treatment decisions for these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unfortunately, data on immunotherapy outcomes for patients with poor performance status and far advanced disease are quite limited. Where available, studies consistently report poorer survival outcomes compared to patients with preserved performance status. However, a minority of patients (15-30%) may achieve at least partial response with immunotherapy, which can be quite durable. Such prognostic uncertainty leads to additional challenges in treatment discussions and decision-making. Given such prognostic uncertainty, clinicians should individualize treatment with consideration for all the various factors that may inform each patient's expected outcome with immunotherapy. Early involvement of palliative care in the disease trajectory can help patients with advanced cancer to optimize their quality of life, improve illness understanding, navigate prognostic uncertainty, and facilitate complex decision-making regarding cancer treatments. With upfront, open discussions of immunotherapy expectations, oncologists can help ensure treatments are aligned with patient goals and optimize value outcomes.

Immunotherapy Outcomes in Individuals with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Poor Performance Status

Background

Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in real-world practice typically have worse performance status (PS) compared with clinical trial patients, and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in this population in unknown. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of standard of care immunotherapy for the first-line treatment of stage IV patients with NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS greater than or equal to 2.

Methods

We selected ECOG PS greater than or equal to 2 patients from real-world oncology data from a deidentified database and included them if they were diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC and had documented Programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] expression greater than 0. Patients with tumor PD-(L)1 expression of at least 50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy were compared with those who did not have any documented treatment. Patients with tumor PD-(L)1 expression less than 50% treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy were compared with those treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy and those without documented treatment.

Results

In our propensity score–adjusted analysis, patients with ECOG PS of at least 2 and tumor PD-(L)1 expression of at least 50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy had statistically significantly better real-world overall survival compared with those without documented treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 95% confidence internal [CI] = 0.32 to 0.47). For patients with tumor PD-(L)1 expression less than 50%, there was also a statistically significant real-world overall survival benefit for those who received treatment either with combination pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.46) or pembrolizumab monotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.70) compared with patients receiving no documented treatment.

Conclusions

Among a highly representative sample of patients with advanced NSCLC and poor PS, our findings suggest that immunotherapy may provide an important survival benefit in individuals with high PD-(L)1–expressing tumors and in conjunction with chemotherapy in tumors with low PD-(L)1 expression.

First-line immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: results of an International Expert Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy represents the standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy in high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors (≥50%) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. However, most pivotal clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not include patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. Hence, a consensus is lacking on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this specific subgroup of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2021 with the aim of reviewing the available evidence on the use of ICIs in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2, both in clinical practice and in a research setting.

RESULTS

All panelists expressed concern about the applicability of currently available PS scales to evaluate patients for ICI treatment. The panelists agreed that, though limited, the available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in PS 2 NSCLC patients, whereas concern was raised on the safety of ICI combinations, mainly related to chemotherapy and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 toxicity. On the basis of reviewed data, ICI efficacy may be speculated in PS 2 NSCLC patients; however, PS 2 remains a negative prognostic category as compared to PS 0-1 in patients treated with ICI, as it is for chemotherapy. The panelists defined high, medium and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to the inclusion of PS 2 patients in prospective clinical trials and the specific evaluation of combined ICI treatments with attenuated chemotherapy doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the major limitations affecting PS 2 patients with NSCLC and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.