Local ablative treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy in single-site and oligometastatic carcinoma of unknown primary

Frequency and Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Cancer of Unknown Primary

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as a primary metastatic malignancy, in which the primary tumor remains elusive in spite of a comprehensive diagnostic workup. The frequency and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are considered to be the source of metastasis, has not yet been systematically evaluated in CUP.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CUP according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, who presented to our clinic between July 2021 and May 2023, provided blood samples for CTC quantification using CellSearch methodology. CTC counts were correlated with demographic, clinical, and molecular data generated by comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue.

RESULTS

CTCs were detected in 26% of all patients at initial presentation to our department. The highest CTC frequency was observed among patients with unfavorable CUP (35.5%), while patients with single-site/oligometastatic CUP harbored the lowest CTC frequency (11.4%). No statistically significant association between CTC positivity and the number of affected organs (P = 0.478) or disease burden (P = 0.120) was found. High CTC levels (≥5 CTCs/7.5 mL; 12/95 analyzed patients) predicted for adverse overall survival compared to negative or low CTC counts (6-months overall survival rate 90% vs 32%, log-rank P < 0.001; HR 5.43; 95% CI 2.23-13.2). CTC dynamics were also prognostic for overall survival by landmark analysis (log-rank P < 0.001, HR 10.2, 95% CI 1.95-52.9).

CONCLUSIONS

CTC frequency is a strong, independent predictor of survival in patients with CUP. CTC quantification provides a useful prognostic tool in the management of these patients.

[Radiological imaging in CUP syndrome]

PROBLEM

If no obvious primary tumour is detectable in metastatic tumours (cancer of unknown primary, CUP), it should nevertheless be identified if possible, as specific therapy achieves better results than empirical, palliative treatment of CUP.

METHODOLOGY

The new guideline of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) defines algorithms for the evaluation of CUP, in which radiological and nuclear imaging procedures play a central role. Important clues to a possible primary tumour are the size and morphology of foci and the presence of a dominant lesion, as well as the pattern of hematogeneous metastatic spread in affected organs, and the anatomical distribution of affected lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

In patients with metastases, imaging plays an important role in identifying a possible primary tumour, but the diagnosis must be made with knowledge of the clinical and immunohistochemical results. In difficult cases, there should be interdisciplinary consultation between reference oncology, radiology, and pathology on the presence of CUP.

[Cancer of unknown primary-The new ESMO guidelines]

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recently published extensively revised guidelines on cancer of unknown primary (CUP). The new version contains the following relevant amendments: with respect to diagnostics of CUP, the current guidelines aim for a more precise and standardized definition of CUP by establishing diagnostic algorithms. Recommendations for molecular diagnostics of cancer tissue have also been implemented. With respect to CUP classification, the favorable category has been revised. A carcinoma with immunohistochemistry typical for renal cell carcinoma (renal-like CUP) was introduced in the new definition of favorable subtypes, for which a specific treatment is indicated. Based on a newly defined oligometastatic situation a subgroup with localized cancer potentially curatively treatable with surgery and/or radiotherapy was introduced into the CUP classification. With respect to treatment of CUP, the current guidelines present options beyond empirical chemotherapy, which is still the standard of care treatment, and pinpoint indications and predictive biomarkers for targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

RELEVANT UPDATES

The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recently published extensively revised guidelines on the CUP syndrome. The new version contains the following relevant amendments: the current guidelines aim for a more precise and standardized definition of CUP by establishing diagnostic algorithms with respect to the diagnostics of CUP syndrome. Recommendations for molecular diagnostics of cancer tissue have also been implemented. The classification of the CUP syndrome has also been revised. A carcinoma with immunohistochemistry typical for renal cell carcinoma (renal-like CUP) was introduced in the new definition of favorable subtypes, for which a specific treatment is indicated. Based on a newly defined oligometastatic situation a local potentially curatively treatable with surgery and/or radiotherapy subgroup was introduced into the CUP classification. With respect to treatment of the CUP syndrome, the current guidelines present options beyond empirical chemotherapy, which is still the gold standard treatment, and pinpoint indications and predictive biomarkers for targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG

The aim of this review is to present the current state of diagnostics, classification and treatment of CUP syndrome, with a focus on recent developments and revisions implemented in the current ESMO guidelines.

[Cancer of unknown primary (CUP)-single-site, oligometastatic, and in the head and neck region]

INTRODUCTION

About 20% of all cancer of unknown primary (CUP) cases can be classified into favorable subgroups, which are defined by either obvious analogies to certain cancers with a known primary or amenability to local ablative treatment. In the updated European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CUP, the definition of favorable subgroups has been revised according to the latest scientific findings. In particular, the definition and treatment of oligometastatic CUP have undergone considerable changes in recent years. Thus, we delineate the current diagnostic and therapeutic standards for the two favorable CUP subtypes single-site/oligometastatic and head/neck CUP.

METHODS

The classification, diagnostic workup, and treatment of single-site and oligometastatic CUP are summarized based on the current ESMO and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines together with a literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-site and oligometastatic CUP is defined by the presence of a maximum of five metastases that are amenable to local ablative treatment. Median overall survival is favorable and exceeds 4 years after local ablation of all detectable metastases. Lymph node metastases in the head and neck region represent a frequent scenario of single-site CUP. They usually originate from human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous cell carcinoma in the oropharynx. Diagnostic workup comprises computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) if necessary, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), followed by panendoscopy and biopsies of suspicious mucosal sites. Neck dissection, potentially followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, and definitive radiotherapy represent equally effective oncological treatment options with respect to a favorable prognosis.

From Biology to Diagnosis and Treatment: The Ariadne’s Thread in Cancer of Unknown Primary

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) encloses a group of heterogeneous tumours, the primary sites for which cannot be identified at the time of diagnosis, despite extensive investigations. CUP has always posed major challenges both in its diagnosis and management, leading to the hypothesis that it is rather a distinct entity with specific genetic and phenotypic aberrations, considering the regression or dormancy of the primary tumour; the development of early, uncommon systemic metastases; and the resistance to therapy. Patients with CUP account for 1–3% of all human malignancies and can be categorised into two prognostic subsets according to their clinicopathologic characteristics at presentation. The diagnosis of CUP mainly depends on the standard evaluation comprising a thorough medical history; complete physical examination; histopathologic morphology and algorithmic immunohistochemistry assessment; and CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. However, physicians and patients do not fare well with these criteria and often perform additional time-consuming evaluations to identify the primary tumour site to guide treatment decisions. The development of molecularly guided diagnostic strategies has emerged to complement traditional procedures but has been disappointing thus far. In this review, we present the latest data on CUP regarding the biology, molecular profiling, classification, diagnostic workup, and treatment.

Real-world histopathological approach to malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO) to diagnose cancers of unknown primary (CUPs)

The aim of this study is to envisage a streamlined pathological workup to rule out CUPs in patients presenting with MUOs. Sixty-four MUOs were classified using standard histopathology. Clinical data, immunocytochemical markers, and results of molecular analysis were recorded. MUOs were histologically subdivided in clear-cut carcinomas (40 adenocarcinomas, 11 squamous, and 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas) and unclear-carcinoma features (5 undifferentiated and 5 sarcomatoid tumors). Cytohistology of 7/40 adenocarcinomas suggested an early metastatic cancer per se. In 33/40 adenocarcinomas, CK7/CK20 expression pattern, gender, and metastasis sites influenced tissue-specific marker selection. In 23/40 adenocarcinomas, a "putative-immunophenotype" of tissue of origin addressed clinical-diagnostic examinations, identifying 9 early metastatic cancers. Cell lineage markers were used to confirm squamous and neuroendocrine differentiation. Pan-cytokeratins were used to confirm the epithelial nature of poorly differentiated tumors, followed by tissue and cell lineage markers, which identified one melanoma. In total, 47/64 MUOs (73.4%) were confirmed CUP. Molecular analysis, feasible in 37/47 CUPs (78.7%), had no diagnostic impact. Twenty CUP patients, mainly with squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas with putative-gynecologic-immunophenotypes, presented with only lymph node metastases and had longer median time to progression and overall survival (< 0.001), compared with patients with other metastatic patterns. We propose a simplified histology-driven workup which could efficiently rule out CUPs and identify early metastatic cancer.