Health-related quality of life in the phase III ASCENT trial of sacituzumab govitecan versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Triple-negative breast cancer is difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone receptors and Her2neu. Sacituzumab govitecan is a new therapeutic approach that uses an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen present in solid epithelial tumors, linked to the active metabolite SN-38, similar to irinotecan, to specifically target cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy cells. The objective of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan as a single treatment in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and to compare its results with the standard conventional chemotherapy regimen currently used in this disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized clinical trials of sacituzumab govitecan was performed. The search was performed in Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane from September 2022 to January 2024.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight articles are included and evaluated according to inclusion and exclusion criteria corresponding to the two most relevant clinical trials, including specific analyses of cohorts and subgroup study arms within these trials. Data from more recent clinical trials are also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy results showed a significantly greater clinical benefit with sacituzumab govitecan compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This drug will become a treatment of substantial impact in future treatment guidelines for this type of cancer.

Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer: Advantages and Advancements of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, a Type of Chemo-Biologic Hybrid Drugs

Cancer is a significant health challenge globally, with millions of people affected every year, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Although other treatment options are available with limitations, chemotherapy, either standalone or combined with other therapeutic procedures, is the most commonly used practice of treating cancer. In chemotherapy, cancer cells/malignant tumors are targeted; however, due to less target specificity, along with malignant cells, normal cells are also affected, which leads to various off-target effects (side effects) that impact the patient quality of life. Out of all the different types of cancers, breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in humans worldwide. Current anticancer drug discovery research aims to develop therapeutics with higher potency and lower toxicity, which is only possible through target-specific therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are explicitly designed to target malignant tumors and minimize off-target effects by reducing systemic cytotoxicity. Several ADCs have been approved for clinical use and have shown moderate to good efficacy so far. Considering various aspects, chemotherapy and ADCs are useful in treating cancer. However, ADCs provide a more focused and less toxic approach, which is especially helpful in cases where resistance to chemotherapy (drug resistance) occurs and in the type of malignancies in which specific antigens are overexpressed. Ongoing ADC research aims to develop more target-specific cancer treatments. In short, this study presents a concise overview of ADCs specific to breast cancer treatment. This study provides insight into the classifications, mechanisms of action, structural aspects, and clinical trial phases (current status) of these chemo-biologic drugs (ADCs).

Health-related quality of life with sacituzumab govitecan in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the phase III TROPiCS-02 trial

BACKGROUND

The TROPiCS-02 study (NCT03901339) demonstrated that sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has superior clinical outcomes over treatment of physician's choice (TPC) chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here, we present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) patient-reported outcome (PRO) findings from this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible adults with HR+/HER2- mBC who previously received a taxane, endocrine-based therapy, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 2-4 lines of chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC until progression or unacceptable toxicity. PROs were assessed at baseline and on day 1 of each cycle, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), EQ-5D-5L, and PRO Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

RESULTS

Compared to TPC, overall least square mean change from baseline was significantly better for SG for physical functioning and dyspnea, but worse for diarrhea. Time to first clinically meaningful worsening or death was significantly longer for SG in global health status/quality of life, physical functioning, fatigue, emotional functioning, dyspnea, insomnia, and financial difficulties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EQ-VAS, but longer for TPC in diarrhea. Few patients in both arms reported experiencing any worsening to level 3 or 4 treatment-related symptomatic events during treatment, as assessed by 16 PRO-CTCAE items, except for diarrhea frequency and amount of hair loss, which favored TPC.

CONCLUSIONS

SG was associated with an HRQoL benefit in most symptoms and functioning, compared with TPC. This supports the favorable profile of SG as a treatment option for patients with pretreated HR+/HER2- mBC.

Sacituzumab govitecan in triple-negative breast cancer: from bench to bedside, and back

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a major therapeutic challenge due to its heterogeneous and aggressive phenotype, and limited target-specific treatment options. The trophoblast cell surface antigen (Trop-2), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in various cancers, has emerged as a promising target for TNBC. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets Trop-2, has recently entered treatment algorithms for advanced and metastatic TNBC, independently from Trop-2 expression status, with manageable toxicity. Despite the impressive results, questions remain unsolved regarding its efficacy, safety profile, and Trop-2 biological role in cancer. Currently, Trop-2 cannot be designated as a predictive biomarker in SG treatment, albeit its expression correlates with disease outcome, yet its levels are not uniform across all TNBCs. Additionally, data regarding Trop-2 expression variations in primary and metastatic sites, and its interplay with other biomarkers are still ambiguous but mandatory in light of future applications of SG in other indications and settings. This poses the questions of a careful evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity profile of SG in such early stages of disease, and in personalized and combinatorial strategies. Research and clinical data are mandatory to address SG drawbacks and minimize its benefits, to realize its full potential as therapeutic agent in different epithelial tumors.

Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), sacituzumab govitecan (SG), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are three ADCs approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Since gastrointestinal toxicities have been commonly observed with these drugs in clinical trials, a pooled analysis evaluating gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) in patients with MBC treated with ADCs in clinical trials was performed. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until May 2023 for phase II and III clinical trials reporting frequency and severity of gastrointestinal AEs during treatment with ADCs. Data were retrieved for nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain: overall and grade 3-4 toxicity rates according to NCI-CTCAE were collected and expressed as proportions. A pre-specified subgroup analysis according to the agent was also carried out. Fourteen studies, comprising 5608 patients, were included in the analysis. Gastrointestinal AEs were frequently registered with SG and T-DXd. A significantly higher frequency of nausea (65.6% with SG, 75% with T-DXd), vomiting (43.7% with SG, 45% with T-DXd), and diarrhea (59.7% with SG, 29% with T-DXd) was noticed with these ADCs compared to TDM-1. Furthermore, diarrhea was more frequently associated with SG (grade 3 in 7.5% of patients), while constipation and abdominal pain were less common. Gastrointestinal AEs, notably nausea and diarrhea, were frequently reported by MBC patients treated with SG and T-DXd in clinical trials. Since these ADCs are administered continuously until disease progression or occurrence of unbearable AEs, gastrointestinal toxicity may have a negative impact on patient quality of life. Therefore, appropriate management of gastrointestinal AEs is mandatory to ensure treatment efficacy and adherence.

Application of the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale to assess the clinical benefit of antibody drug conjugates in solid cancer: a systematic descriptive analysis of phase III and pivotal phase II trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical benefit value of approved antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for solid tumours using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) V.1.1.

DESIGN

Systematic descriptive analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched for publications from 1 January 2000 to 18 October 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included the phase III randomised controlled trials or phase II pivotal trials leading to approval of ADCs in solid tumours.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and discrepancies were resolved by consensus in the presence of a third investigator.

RESULTS

ESMO-MCBS Scores were calculated for 16 positive clinical trials of eight ADCs, which were first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the China National Medical Products Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency for solid cancers. Among 16 trials, 4 (25%) met the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade, while 12 (75%) of the regimens did not meet the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade. 5 (31%) of the 16 trials had no published scorecard on the ESMO website due to the approval by other jurisdictions but not by the FDA or EMA. Discrepancies between our results and the ESMO scorecard were observed in 4 (36%) of 11 trials, mostly owing to integration of more recent data.

CONCLUSIONS

ESMO-MCBS is an important tool for assessing the clinical benefit of cancer drugs, but not all drugs met the meaningful benefit threshold.

Pooled analysis of NeoCARH and NeoCART trials: patient-reported outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Anthracycline-based or platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy belongs to the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) that is either triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2 +). Currently, there is a paucity of data comparing their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Triple-negative or HER2 + EBC from our two prospective randomized controlled trials, neoCARH and neoCART, were divided into two groups based on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens they received: anthracycline-based or platinum-based group. HRQoL was the exploratory endpoint in these two trials, which was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core30 and Breast23 questionnaires. The primary variable of interest was the C30 summary score (C30-SumSc). Assessments were carried out at baseline, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 1 year and 2 years after diagnosis.

RESULTS

The mean questionnaires' compliance rate was 95.0%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 210 patients had evaluable HRQoL data, the mean least square change from baseline for the platinum-based group was - 15.997 (95% confidence interval (CI): - 17.877 to - 14.117), and it was - 20.156 (95% CI: - 22.053 to - 18.258) for the anthracycline-based group (difference: 4.159, 95% CI: 1.462 to 6.855, P = 0.003, minimal important difference = 3). For the majority of the domains of interest assessed by the C30 and BR23 questionnaires, the platinum-based group demonstrated superior outcomes in comparison to the anthracycline-based group.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based regimens both experienced worsened HRQoL after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the former provided relatively better HRQoL compared with the latter.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03140553. Registered 4 May 2017 (neoCARH). NCT03154749. Registered 16 May 2017 (neoCART).

Final Results From the Randomized Phase III ASCENT Clinical Trial in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Association of Outcomes by Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Trophoblast Cell Surface Antigen 2 Expression

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a first-in-class anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated superior efficacy over single-agent chemotherapy (treatment of physician's choice [TPC]) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the international, multicenter, phase III ASCENT study.Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive SG or TPC until unacceptable toxicity/progression. Final efficacy secondary end point analyses and post hoc analyses of outcomes stratified by Trop-2 expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status are reported. Updated safety analyses are provided.In this final analysis, SG (n = 267) improved median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.8 v 1.7 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.41 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.52]) and median overall survival (OS; 11.8 v 6.9 months; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.63]) over TPC (n = 262). SG improved PFS over TPC in each Trop-2 expression quartile (n = 168); a trend was observed for improved OS across quartiles. Overall, SG had a manageable safety profile, with ≤5% of treatment-related discontinuations because of adverse events and no treatment-related deaths. The safety profile was consistent across all subgroups.These data confirm the clinical benefit of SG over chemotherapy, reinforcing SG as an effective treatment option in patients with mTNBC in the second line or later.

Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a trial-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has recently been approved in China for the post-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). SG substantially improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with single-agent chemotherapy for pretreated mTNBC. However, in view of the high price of SG, it is necessary to consider its value in terms of costs and outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of SG versus single-agent treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in the post-line setting for patients with mTNBC from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

The cohort characteristics were sourced from the ASCENT randomized clinical trial, which enrolled 468 heavily pretreated patients with mTNBC between November 2017 and September 2019. A partitioned survival model was constructed to assess the long-term costs and effectiveness of SG versus TPC in the post-line treatment of mTNBC. Quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) and total costs in 2022 US dollars were used to derive incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). QALMs and costs were discounted at 5% annually. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was defined as $3188 per QALM, three times China's average monthly per capita gross domestic product in 2022. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analyses were performed to estimate the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Treatment with SG yielded an incremental 5.17 QALMs at a cost of $44,792 per QALM, much above the WTP threshold of $3188/QALM in China. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that SG price was a crucial factor in the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost-effective acceptability of SG was 0% in the current setting. Scenario analyses indicated that the result was robust in all subgroups in ASCENT or under different time horizons. Furthermore, SG must reduce the price to enter the Chinese mainland market. When the monthly cost of SG reduce to $2298, SG has about 50% probability to be a preferred choice than TPC.

CONCLUSIONS

SG was estimated to be not cost-effective compared with TPC for post-line treatment for mTNBC in China by the current price in HK under a WTP threshold of $3188 per QALM. A drastic price reduction is necessary to improve its cost-effectiveness.

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors enhance programmed cell death protein 1 immune checkpoint blockade efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer by affecting the immune microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have shown unsatisfactory efficacy due to low tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels. Inhibitors targeting cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) proteins can affect the immune microenvironment, increase TIL levels, and promote antitumor immunity, thus providing a new direction for TNBC treatment strategies.

METHODS

The authors tested three CDK inhibitors on the TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 and validated their antitumor effects and impact on the immune microenvironment using multiple detection methods. They verified the efficacy and immune-related mechanisms of different combination therapy experiments in a 4T1 cell-transplanted BALB/c mouse model.

RESULTS

Treatment with CDK inhibitors for 72 hours inhibited cell proliferation, clone formation, migration, and cell-cycle arrest and induced apoptosis in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells and mouse breast cancer 4T1 cells. CDK inhibitors suppressed DNA methylation by downregulating DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b expression. These three inhibitors promoted the secretion of various chemokines, enhanced tumor cell antigen presentation, and increased PD-L1 expression. CDK inhibitors improved the efficacy of immunotherapy in animal models and increased TIL levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with CDK and PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors affects the immune microenvironment, promotes antitumor immunity, and improves the efficacy of immunotherapy for TNBC.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15%-20% of all breast cancer. It is a heterogeneous breast cancer subtype with a poor prognosis. Given these negative features, there is a need for new treatment options beyond conventional chemotherapy in both the early stage and palliative setting. Impressive results have been reported with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that link a cytotoxic payload to a monoclonal antibody, such as sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan, in the metastatic stage. The focus of this review is to discuss completed and ongoing trials involving ADCs in TNBC.

Sacituzumab Govitecan for the treatment of advanced triple negative breast cancer patients: a multi-center real-world analysis

Objective

The objective of this multicenter, observational, retrospective analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients managed according to common clinical practice in Italy.

Methods

Data were retrieved by 7 sites. Triple-negative BC was defined by the lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER <1%), progesterone receptor (PgR <1%) and human-epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2 0, 1+, 2+ ISH-not amplified) according to standard ASCO-CAP criteria. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Premedication, dose modifications and treatment schedule were based on the approved label of the product. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0.

Results

Fifty-seven eligible patients who received sacituzumab govitecan for mTNBC were included. Median age was 53 years (range 25-75). Approximately 70% of patients had an initial diagnosis of TNBC. Median time from the diagnosis of metastatic BC to start of sacituzumab govitecan was 17 months (range 0-97) and median number of previous therapies was 3 (range 1-7). The most common sites of metastasis were lymph nodes (63.1% of patients), lung (57.9%), bone (50.8%) and liver (38.6%). Eight (14.0%) patients had a disease-free interval ≤12 months. A total of 32 (56.1%) deaths were observed and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.43 months (95% CI, 7.97 months-not reached). At a median follow-up of 10.6 months, 45 patients (78.9%) had progression and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.1 months). Partial tumour response was observed in 19 patients (33.3%), stable disease in 16 (28.1%) and disease progression in 22 patients (38.6%). The most common treatment-related AEs were anemia (66.6% of patients), alopecia (66.6%), neutropenia (59.6%), nausea (42.1%) and diarrhea (38.6%). Neutropenia was the most common serious treatment-related AE: 21.0% and 8.7% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, respectively. Twenty-two patients (38.6%) reduced the dose and 5.3% permanently discontinued treatment.

Conclusion

The results of this real-world analysis showed that both safety and efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan in mTNBC patients are consistent with that previously reported in regulatory trials. The use of premedication and supportive measures was associated with a satisfactory toxicity profile.

Breaking barriers in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) - Unleashing the power of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel class of molecules composed of a recombinant monoclonal antibody targeted to a specific cell surface antigen, conjugated to a cytotoxic agent through a cleavable or non-cleavable synthetic linker. The rationale behind the development of ADCs is to overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapy, such as the narrow therapeutic window and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. ADCs had already revolutionized the treatment algorithm of HER2-positive breast cancer. Currently, emergent non-HER2 targeted ADCs are gaining momentum, with special focus on triple-negative disease therapeutic landscape. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an ADC consisting of a humanized monoclonal antibody hRS7 targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop2), linked to the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38 by a hydrolysable linker. It currently stands as the only non-HER2 targeted ADC that already received approval for the treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in patients who had received two or more prior systemic therapies, with at least one for advanced disease. The purpose of these review is to analyze the available evidence regarding ADCs in TNBC, alongside with providing an overview on the ongoing and future research horizons in this field.

Third-line Treatment for Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an invasive histologic subtype with a poor prognosis and rapid progression. Currently, there is no standard therapy for the third-line treatment of mTNBC. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis to compare regimens and determine treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Bases, and the minutes of major conferences. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate were analyzed through network meta-analysis using the R software (R Core Team). The efficacy of the treatment regimens was compared using hazard ratios, odds ratios, and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

We evaluated 15 randomized controlled trials involving 6,010 patients. Compared with the physician's choice treatment, sacituzumab govitecan showed significant advantages in progression-free survival and overall survival, with hazard ratio values of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.32-0.52) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.60). In terms of objective response rate, sacituzumab govitecan is the best-performing therapy (odds ratio: 10.82; 95% CI: 5.58-20.97). Adverse events among grades 3 to 5 adverse reactions, the incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia in each regimen was higher, whereas the incidence of fever, headache, hypertension, and rash was lower.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the treatment of the physician's choice, sacituzumab govitecan appears more efficacious and is the preferred third-line treatment for mTNBC.

Advances in the study of marketed antibody-drug Conjugates (ADCs) for the treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer continues to have a high incidence rate among female malignancies. Despite significant advancements in treatment modalities, the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer and its resistance to various therapeutic approaches pose considerable challenges. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) effectively merge the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, offering a novel strategy for precision treatment of breast cancer. Notably, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has provided a new therapeutic option for HER2-positive breast cancer patients globally, especially those resistant to conventional treatments. The development of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has further broadened the applicability of ADCs in breast cancer therapy, presenting new hopes for patients with low HER2 expression and triple-negative breast cancer. However, the application of ADCs presents certain challenges. For instance, their treatment may lead to adverse reactions such as interstitial lung disease, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. Moreover, prolonged treatment could result in ADCs resistance, complicating the therapeutic process. Economically, the high costs of ADCs might hinder their accessibility in low-income regions. This article reviews the structure, mechanism of action, and clinical trials of commercially available ADCs for breast cancer treatment, with a focus on the clinical trials of the three drugs, aiming to provide insights for clinical applications and future research.

Impact of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: results from the phase 3 randomised KEYNOTE-119 study

BACKGROUND

In KEYNOTE-119 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02555657), overall survival (primary end-point) was similar between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), although the pembrolizumab treatment effect increased with tumour PD-L1 expression. We report results of prespecified health-related quality of life (HRQoL) analyses from KEYNOTE-119.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W intravenously for up to 35 cycles or treatment of physician's choice per local/country guidelines. Prespecified exploratory end-points were the change from baseline in HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) and to characterise utilities (EQ-5D-3L). Time to deterioration (TTD) was the time from start of treatment to first onset of a ≥10-point worsening from baseline.

RESULTS

HRQoL analyses included 187 patients with tumour PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10. Changes from baseline at 6 weeks (primary analysis time point) were directionally better with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (between-group difference in least-squares mean scores of 4.21 [95% CI, -1.38 to 9.80]), QLQ-C30 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, social), QLQ-C30 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss), and QLQ-BR23 symptom scales/items (systemic therapy side-effects, upset by hair loss). Median TTD was directionally longer for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for QLQ-C30 QHS/QoL (4.3 versus 1.7 months), QLQ-C30 nausea/vomiting (7.7 versus 4.8 months), and QLQ-BR23 systemic therapy side-effects (6.1 versus 3.4 months). Minimal treatment differences were observed for other HRQoL end-points.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL results were consistent with clinical outcomes and appeared to be driven by results for patients with tumour PD-L1 CPS ≥10.

Meta-analysis of quality of life in patients with cancer treated with antibody-drug conjugates in randomized controlled trials

Purpose: To evaluate the patient-reported outcomes of patients treated with commercially approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) reported in randomized controlled trials (RCT) published up to September 2023. Methods: A meta-analysis of 6430 patients from 12 randomized controlled trials was conducted. Results: No significant change was observed between the groups from baseline to end of treatment and end of follow-up, with a standardized mean difference of -0.08 (95% CI: -0.27-0.12) and 0.01 (95% CI: -0.11-0.12), respectively. Treatment with ADCs delayed the deterioration of patients' clinical condition compared with treatment with non-ADCs, with a hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.92). Conclusion: ADCs have a good correlation with delay of clinical deterioration in patients with cancer.

Safety and effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in real-world settings: first observations from an interdisciplinary breast cancer centre in Germany

Background

Sacituzumab govitecan has been recently approved by the USFDA and EMA for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We report real-world safety and effectiveness in patients with mTNBC receiving sacituzumab govitecan treatment at a breast cancer centre in Germany.

Methods

Data from patients who had received sacituzumab govitecan as treatment for mTNBC, in both de novo and relapsed disease, at the Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany, were collected through institutional records. Data were analysed for safety parameters and survival outcomes and reported using descriptive statistics.

Results

Patients (N = 43) received a median (range) of 5 (1-28) cycles of sacituzumab govitecan and were followed up for a median of 12.9 months. The most reported adverse events (AEs) of any grade were alopecia (n = 39; 90.7%), diarrhoea (n = 16; 37.2%), fatigue (n = 15, 34.9%), anaemia (n = 15, 34.9%) and neutropenia (n = 14, 32.6%). AEs ⩾ Grade 3 with the highest incidence were neutropenia (n = 12; 27.9%) and diarrhoea (n = 8; 18.6%). In eight (18.6%) patients, dose of sacituzumab govitecan dose was reduced due to patients' clinical condition prior to commencing treatment; in further 17 (39.5%) patients, sacituzumab govitecan dose had to be reduced or treatment interrupted on account of AEs associated with the drug after treatment had commenced. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were calculated to be 5.0and 13.1 months, respectively.

Conclusion

The real-world safety and effectiveness profile of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with mTNBC are in line with clinical trial data. Further studies are required to guide optimal use of sacituzumab govitecan against mTNBC, especially in context of management of accompanying AEs.

Targeting Trop-2 in cancer: Recent research progress and clinical application

The development of new antitumor drugs depends mainly upon targeting tumor cells precisely. Trophoblast surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein involved in Ca2+ signaling in tumor cells. It is highly expressed in various tumor tissues than in normal tissues and represents a novel and promising molecular target for caner targeted therapy. Up to now, the mechanisms and functions associated with Trop-2 have been extensively studied in a variety of solid tumors. According to these findings, Trop-2 plays an important role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell adhesion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, as well as tumorigenesis and tumor progression. In addition, Trop-2 related drugs are also being developed widely. There are a number of Trop-2 related ADC drugs that have demonstrated potent antitumor activity and are currently been studied, such as Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-Dxd). In this study, we reviewed the progress of Trop-2 research in solid tumors. We also sorted out the composition and rationale of Trop-2 related drugs and summarized the related clinical trials. Finally, we discussed the current status of Trop-2 research and expanded our perspectives on its future research directions. Importantly, we found that Trop-2 targeted ADCs have great potential for combination with other antitumor therapies. Trop-2 targeted ADCs can reprogramme tumor microenvironment through multiple signaling pathways, ultimately activating antitumor immunity.

Surgical robot-assisted tripod percutaneous reconstruction technique combined with bone cement filling technique for the treatment of acetabular metastasis

Background: Acetabular metastasis is a type of metastatic bone cancer, and it mainly metastasizes from cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and renal carcinoma. Acetabular metastasis often causes severe pain, pathological fractures, and hypercalcemia which may seriously affect the quality of life of acetabular metastasis patients. Due to the characteristics of acetabular metastasis, there is no most suitable treatment to address it. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate a novel treatment technique to relieve these symptoms. Methods: Our study explored a novel technique to reconstruct the stability of the acetabular structure. A surgical robot was used for accurate positioning and larger-bore cannulated screws were accurately inserted under the robot's guidance. Then, the lesion was curetted and bone cement was injected through a screw channel to further strengthen the structure and kill tumor cells. Results: A total of five acetabular metastasis patients received this novel treatment technique. The data relating to surgery were collected and analyzed. The results found that this novel technique can significantly reduce operation time, intraoperative bleeding, visual analogue score scores, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, and postoperative complications (e.g., infection, implant loosening, hip dislocation) after treatment. Follow-up time ranged from 3 months to 6 months, and the most recent follow-up results showed that all patients survived and no acetabular metastasis progressed in any of the patients after surgery. Conclusion: Surgical robot-assisted tripod percutaneous reconstruction combined with the bone cement filling technique may be a novel and suitable treatment in acetabular metastasis patients. Our study may provide new insights into the treatment of acetabular metastasis.