Controversies in the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma: Recommendations of the Conference on State of Science in Sarcoma 2022

The sarcoma ring trial: a case-based analysis of inter-center agreement across 21 German-speaking sarcoma centers

PURPOSE

The management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB) improves patient survival. The German Cancer Society (DKG) certifies sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, promoting high standards of care. This study investigated the variability in treatment recommendations for localized STS across different German-speaking tertiary sarcoma centers.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional case-based survey study, 5 anonymized patient cases with imaging data of localized STS were presented to MTBs of 21 German-speaking tertiary referral hospitals. Centers provided recommendations on treatment sequence and modalities, along with the consensus level within their MTB. Agreement percentages were calculated, and consensus levels were rated on a scale of 1 to 10.

RESULTS

Five patient cases were discussed resulting in 105 recommendations. Agreement percentages for case 1 to 5 were 14.3%, 61.9%, 33.3%, 52.4% and 9.3%, with a median agreement percentage of 33.3%. Grouping pre- and postoperative therapies as "perioperative" and including recommendations with and without regional hyperthermia raised the median agreement to 47.6%. The mean consensus level within each center across all 5 cases was 9.5.

CONCLUSION

This first case-based analysis of inter-center agreement for STS management in German-speaking countries reveals low inter-center agreement but high intra-center consensus. Our study includes nearly all tertiary sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, affirming its strong external validity. These findings suggest potential and clinically very relevant differences in treatment standards among sarcoma centers. Enhanced case-based exchanges and collaborative efforts are needed to reduce discrepancies and standardize the management of STS patients.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Comparing epidemiological and clinical data from RPS patients documented in a German cancer registry to a cohort from TARPSWG reference centres

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare, heterogeneous tumours. Treatment recommendations are mainly derived from cohorts treated at reference centres. The applicability of data from cancer registries (CR) is controversial. This work compares CR and TARPSWG (Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group) data to assess the representativeness of the TARPSWG and the applicability of the CR data.

METHODS

TARPSWG cohort has previously been described. The CR Baden-Württemberg cohort includes patients with primary RPS M0 (years 2016-2021, ICD-10 C.49.4/5, C48.x) who underwent surgery within 12 months. Only patients with sarcoma-typical histology codes as used for the German Cancer Society certification system were included. Patient, tumour and therapy factors as well as survival times were compared with Chi2-test, Kaplan Meier curves, and adjusted models.

RESULTS

1000 (TARPSWG) and 364 (CR) patients were included. CR patients were older (median: 64 years vs. 58 years), had more high-grade tumours (FNCLCC 3 48.1% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.0001) and the 5-year survival rate was significantly lower (56.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.0015). The proportions of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (CR 37.1% vs. 37.0%) and leiomyosarcoma (CR 20.1% vs. 19.2%), and patterns of recurrence in these most frequent RPS subtypes were similar.

CONCLUSION

ICD-O/ICD 10 based filters appear to be a valid tool for extracting RPS cases from CR. The similar distribution and biological behavior of distinct RPS subtypes suggests that TARPS-WG are representative, and CR data may be used to verify recommendations derived from reference centre cohorts. Complementary use of data from different sources warrants further investigation in rare cancers.

What is the Optimal Treatment Strategy after Sarcoma R2 Surgery?

OPINION STATEMENT

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, most commonly occurring in the extremity but also in the retroperitoneum. The curative treatment for STS is radical surgery with wide margins, in some cases in combination with perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nonradical resection (R2) of STS has been an emerging issue in recent decades, as optimal subsequent management remains debatable. Similarly, there is still no consensus on optimal surgical margins. Combining multiple treatment modalities in adjuvant therapy can achieve local and distant control in patients following surgery with positive margins. Patients who have undergone nonradical resection therefore require additional surgical interventions, and adjuvant radiotherapy resulting in a better prognosis but a higher number of complications. Following non-radical treatment, patients with limb and trunk wall sarcomas and retroperitoneal sarcomas should also undergo increased oncological surveillance. Given the potential issues that may emerge in such clinical situations, it is crucial to up-date the current guidelines to enhance the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Regional hyperthermia for soft tissue sarcoma - a survey on current practice, controversies and consensus among 12 European centers

PURPOSE

To analyze the current practice of regional hyperthermia (RHT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at 12 European centers to provide an overview, find consensuses and identify controversies necessary for future guidelines and clinical trials.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, a 27-item questionnaire assessing clinical subjects and procedural details on RHT for STS was distributed to 12 European cancer centers for RHT.

RESULTS

We have identified seven controversies and five consensus points. Of 12 centers, 6 offer both, RHT with chemotherapy (CTX) or with radiotherapy (RT). Two centers only offer RHT with CTX and four centers only offer RHT with RT. All 12 centers apply RHT for localized, high-risk STS of the extremities, trunk wall and retroperitoneum. However, eight centers also use RHT in metastatic STS, five in palliative STS, eight for superficial STS and six for low-grade STS. Pretherapeutic imaging for RHT treatment planning is used by 10 centers, 9 centers set 40-43 °C as the intratumoral target temperature, and all centers use skin detectors or probes in body orifices for thermometry.

DISCUSSION

There is disagreement regarding the integration of RHT in contemporary interdisciplinary care of STS patients. Many clinical controversies exist that require a standardized consensus guideline and innovative study ideas. At the same time, our data has shown that existing guidelines and decades of experience with the technique of RHT have mostly standardized procedural aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

The provided results may serve as a basis for future guidelines and inform future clinical trials for RHT in STS patients.

SAKK57/16 Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Soft Tissue Sarcoma (NAPAGE): a phase I/II trial

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine has activity in patients with pretreated soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NAPAGE is a phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating the combination of nab-paclitaxel (nab-pc) with gemcitabine employing two cohorts. One of a dose-de-escalation phase and one of expansion. In phase I, nab-pc was given at 150 mg/m2 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 every two weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. This dose was recommended for phase II (RP2D), as there was no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) or discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint of the phase II was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months (H0: 20%, H1:40%). The secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), AEs, objective response and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

The 3-month PFR was 56.4% (95% confidence interval CI: 39.6-72.2%). The 3-month and 6-month PFS were 58.4% (95% CI: 41.3-72.1%) and 44.6% (95% CI: 28.4-59.5%), respectively. Median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 1.4-8.2) and median OS was 12.8 months (95% CI: 10.5-39.2). The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 AE were neutropenia (18%), followed by anemia (2.6%), hypertension (2.6%) and alanine aminotransferase increase (2.6%). Grade 1 and grade 2 peripheral sensory neuropathy (PNP) occurred in 15.4% and 20.5%, respectively. No grade 3-4 PNP was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining nab-pc and gemcitabine is safe. Promising activity is observed in pretreated STS patients with manageable toxicity. This regimen should be considered for further exploration.

Survival Differences of Patients with Resected Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma Receiving Two Different (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AIMS

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is a malignant tumour developing in soft tissues, characterised by the production of osteoid or bone matrix by tumour cells. The standard treatment for localised ESOS is wide resection. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are usually incorporated into the management of patients. Two types of chemotherapy regimen are mostly used: an osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy, based on cisplatin, and a soft-tissue sarcoma (STS)-type chemotherapy, using the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide. To investigate the difference in survival between these two chemotherapy regimens, a systematic review of studies reporting the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates among patients with ESOS submitted to surgery and who received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with osteosarcoma-type or STS-type chemotherapy was carried out.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 401 articles identified by systematically searching the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, six retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. In total, 319 patients with localised/resected ESOS were included in the study.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis showed a benefit in 5-year DFS favouring the use of osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy (relative risk = 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.69; P = 0.54); I2 heterogeneity was 0%. The 5-year DFS rate was 56.3% (95% confidence interval 48.3-64.3) with osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy and 45.2% (95% confidence interval 34.5-55.9) with STS-type chemotherapy, with I2 heterogeneity of 27% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that there may be a difference regarding the type of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy regimen used in the treatment of patients with resected ESOS in favour of osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy. Future studies evaluating the role of this treatment modality in this scenario need to consider the type of chemotherapy regimen when comparing with an arm of surgery with/without radiotherapy alone.

Clinician survey of current global practice for sarcoma surveillance following resection of primary retroperitoneal, abdominal, and pelvic sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

- Postoperative surveillance following resection of primary retroperitoneal, abdominal, and pelvic sarcoma (RPS) is standard of care in international sarcoma centres and has rapidly evolved without an evidence base to become highly intensive and prolonged. This clinician survey aims to capture a global, contemporary snapshot of international guidelines used to inform sarcoma surveillance following resection of primary RPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

- Between July 2022 and March 2023, an online, anonymous, clinician survey to assess the current duration, imaging intervals and imaging modalities used for postoperative surveillance following resection of primary RPS was distributed among clinicians working at centres which are members of the TransAtlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Working Group (TARPSWG).

RESULTS

- Responses were received from 58 different TARPSWG centres. The majority of centres use institutional guidelines to guide surveillance intensity (n = 43, 74%) and the surveillance imaging modality (n = 39, 67%) used. For surveillance intensity and imaging modality, institutional guidelines are partially or entirely based on international guidelines in 81% (n = 47) and 78% (n = 45) of centres, respectively. Commonly used imaging modalities are contrast-enhanced CT abdomen-pelvis (n = 51, 88%) for abdominal surveillance and non-contrast enhanced CT (n = 25, 43%) for chest surveillance. Imaging intervals, timing of de-escalation of imaging frequency and total duration of surveillance for low-grade and high-grade RPS are reported.

CONCLUSION

- This global survey among TARPSWG members demonstrates the heterogeneity in sarcoma surveillance strategies worldwide and emphasises the need for a randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base for the optimal surveillance schedule following primary resection of RPS.

Current stand on systemic therapy in localized soft tissue sarcomas: a clinician's perspective

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare heterogenous tumors derived from mesenchymal tissue. While surgery represents the primary treatment modality, the high recurrence rates following surgery alone necessitate consideration for systemic therapy in high-risk sarcomas. Despite multiple trials and meta-analyses over the last 3 decades, the role of chemotherapy remains controversial. It is crucial to accurately identify patients with high-risk diseases who may benefit the most from adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There is renewed interest in the potential to improve outcomes in localized resectable STSs with the addition of targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies. The review presented here is a summary of current evidence on systemic therapy in resectable localized STSs of the trunk and extremities to facilitate clinician decision-making.

Ten recommendations for sarcoma surgery: consensus of the surgical societies based on the German S3 guideline "Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas"

PURPOSE

The evidence-based (S3) guideline "Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas" (AWMF Registry No. 032/044OL) published by the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) covers all aspects of sarcoma treatment with 229 recommendations. Representatives of all medical specialties involved in sarcoma treatment contributed to the guideline. This paper compiles the most important recommendations for surgeons selected by delegates from the surgical societies.

METHODS

A Delphi process was used. Delegates from the surgical societies involved in guideline process selected the 15 recommendations that were most important to them. Votes for similar recommendations were tallied. From the resulting ranked list, the 10 most frequently voted recommendations were selected and confirmed by consensus in the next step.

RESULTS

The statement "Resection of primary soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities should be performed as a wide resection. The goal is an R0 resection" was selected as the most important term. The next highest ranked recommendations were the need for a preoperative biopsy, performing preoperative MRI imaging with contrast, and discussing all cases before surgery in a multidisciplinary sarcoma committee.

CONCLUSION

The evidence-based guideline "Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas" is a milestone to improve the care of sarcoma patients in Germany. The selection of the top ten recommendations by surgeons for surgeons has the potential to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the guideline and thus improve the overall outcome of sarcoma patients.

The proteomic landscape of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and diverse mesenchymal cancers with limited treatment options. Here we undertake comprehensive proteomic profiling of tumour specimens from 321 STS patients representing 11 histological subtypes. Within leiomyosarcomas, we identify three proteomic subtypes with distinct myogenesis and immune features, anatomical site distribution and survival outcomes. Characterisation of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas with low infiltrating CD3 + T-lymphocyte levels nominates the complement cascade as a candidate immunotherapeutic target. Comparative analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic profiles highlights the proteomic-specific features for optimal risk stratification in angiosarcomas. Finally, we define functional signatures termed Sarcoma Proteomic Modules which transcend histological subtype classification and show that a vesicle transport protein signature is an independent prognostic factor for distant metastasis. Our study highlights the utility of proteomics for identifying molecular subgroups with implications for risk stratification and therapy selection and provides a rich resource for future sarcoma research.

Experiences of patients and their relatives of postoperative radiological surveillance and surveillance intensity following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative radiological surveillance following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma (sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, abdomen, pelvis, trunk or extremities) is standard of care in all international high-volume sarcoma centres in the world. The intensity of postoperative surveillance imaging is highly varied and knowledge of the impact of surveillance and surveillance intensity on patients' quality of life is limited. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the experiences of patients and their relatives/caregivers of postoperative radiological surveillance following resection of a primary soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will systematically search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus and Epistemonikos. Hand searching of reference lists of included studies will be conducted. Further searches will be performed via Google Scholar, to reveal further studies within unpublished 'grey' literature. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria. After retrieval of the full text of the selected studies, the methodological quality will be appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Center for Evidence-Based Management checklist for Critical Appraisal of a Cross-Sectional Study. Data on the study population, relevant themes and conclusions will be extracted from the selected papers, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The systematic review does not require ethics approval. The findings of the proposed work will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated widely to patients, clinicians and allied health professionals through the Sarcoma UK website, the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network and the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group. In addition, the outcomes of this research will be presented at national and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022375118.

Epigenetic Regulation in Breast Cancer: Insights on Epidrugs

Breast cancer remains a common cause of cancer-related death in women. Therefore, further studies are necessary for the comprehension of breast cancer and the revolution of breast cancer treatment. Cancer is a heterogeneous disease that results from epigenetic alterations in normal cells. Aberrant epigenetic regulation is strongly associated with the development of breast cancer. Current therapeutic approaches target epigenetic alterations rather than genetic mutations due to their reversibility. The formation and maintenance of epigenetic changes depend on specific enzymes, including DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases, which are promising targets for epigenetic-based therapy. Epidrugs target different epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and histone methylation, which can restore normal cellular memory in cancerous diseases. Epigenetic-targeted therapy using epidrugs has anti-tumor effects on malignancies, including breast cancer. This review focuses on the importance of epigenetic regulation and the clinical implications of epidrugs in breast cancer.