Tocilizumab as an add-on therapy to glucocorticoids during the first 3 months of treatment of Giant cell arteritis: A prospective study

The pipeline of immunomodulatory therapies in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: A systematic review of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of current developments and potentially available therapeutic options for polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), in the coming years.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of 17 national and international clinical trial databases for all disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for PMR and GCA that are already marketed, in clinical development or withdrawn. The search was performed on January 2024, with the keywords "polymyalgia rheumatica" and "giant cell arteritis". For each molecule, we only considered the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development.

RESULTS

For PMR, a total of 15 DMARDs were identified: 2 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), 11 biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and 2 targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). For GCA, 18 DMARDs were identified: 2 csDMARDs, 14 bDMARDs and 2 tsDMARDs. Currently, there are only 2 approved corticosteroid-sparing therapies in these diseases, which both target the IL-6 signaling pathway, namely tocilizumab in GCA and sarilumab in PMR. Most of the molecules in current development are repurposed from from other conditions and clinical research in PMR/GCA seems to be mostly driven by the potential to repurpose existing treatments rather than by translational research.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified 23 DMARDs evaluated for PMR and GCA: 3 csDMARDs, 17 bDMARDs and 3 tsDMARDs. Several promising treatments are likely to be marketed in the coming years.

Effectiveness Of Tocilizumab In Aortitis And Aneurysms Associated With Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

Aortitis in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA-aortitis) is a frequent complication that may lead to aneurysms. Tocilizumab (TCZ) was approved in GCA, but the efficacy in GCA-aortitis and aneurysms has not been analyzed to date. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of TCZ in a wide series of GCA-aortitis and aneurysms.

METHODS

Multicentre observational study with GCA-aortitis treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. Aortitis was diagnosed mainly by PET/CT. Main outcomes were EULAR and imaging remission. Others were clinical remission, analytical normalization, corticosteroid-sparing effect, and the prevention and improvement of aneurysms.

RESULTS

196 patients with GCA-aortitis treated with TCZ. After 6 months, 72.2% reached EULAR remission but only 12% an imaging remission; increasing up-to 81.4% and 31.8%, respectively, at 24 months. A rapid clinical remission, ESR and CRP normalization was observed in 47.4%, 84.3% and 55.6%, at 1 month, increasing to 89.6%, 85.3% and 80.3% at 24 months, respectively. Aneurysms were present in 10 (5%) patients. Five of them required early surgery, while 3 others enlarged. No patient on TCZ therapy developed aneurysms during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In patients with GCA-aortitis treated with TCZ, a rapid and maintained clinical and analytical improvement was observed. However, there was an uncoupling between clinical and EULAR remission with imaging remission.

Relapse Risk and Safety of Long-Term Tocilizumab Use Among Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A Single-Enterprise Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a large North American cohort.

METHODS

Patients with GCA treated with TCZ between January 1, 2010, and May 15, 2020, were retrospectively identified. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time to TCZ discontinuation and time to first relapse after TCZ discontinuation. Poisson regression models were used to compare annualized relapse rates before, during, and after TCZ use. Age- and sex-adjusted risk factors associated with relapse on and off TCZ and development of adverse events of significant interest (AESIs) were examined using Cox models.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (60.5% female) were included with mean (SD) age 70.4 (8.2) years. Median duration from GCA diagnosis to TCZ start was 4.5 months. Median overall duration of TCZ treatment was 2.3 years. Relapse rate prior to TCZ start (0.84 relapses/person-year) was 3-fold reduced while on TCZ (0.28 relapses/person-year; P < 0.001) but increased to 0.64 relapses/person-year after TCZ discontinuation. Fifty-two patients stopped TCZ after a median of 16.8 months; 27 relapsed after discontinuation (median: 8.4 months; 58% relapsed within 12 months). Only 14.9% of patients stopped TCZ because of AESIs. Neither dose/route of TCZ, presence of large-vessel vasculitis, nor duration of TCZ therapy prior to discontinuation predicted relapse after TCZ stop.

CONCLUSION

TCZ is well tolerated in GCA, with low rates of discontinuation for AESIs. However, relapse occurred in > 50% despite median treatment > 12 months. Since the duration of TCZ prior to discontinuation did not significantly affect subsequent risk of GCA recurrence, further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy.

Biomarkers in the era of targeted therapy in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: is it possible to replace acute-phase reactants?

Research into giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has become more important in the last few decades. Physicians are facing several challenges in managing the diagnosis, treatment, and relapses of GCA and PMR patients. The search for biomarkers could provide elements to guide a physician's decision. In this review, we aim to summarize the scientific publications about biomarkers in GCA and PMR in the past decade. The first point raised by this review is the number of clinical situations in which biomarkers could be useful: differential diagnosis of either GCA or PMR, diagnosis of underlying vasculitis in PMR, prediction of relapse or complications, disease activity monitoring, choice, and modification of treatments. The second point raised by this review is the large number of biomarkers studied, from common markers like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or elements of blood count to inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, or immune cell subpopulations. Finally, this review underlines the heterogeneity between the studies and proposes points to consider in studies evaluating biomarkers in general and particularly in the case of GCA and PMR.

Biologic therapy in large and small vessels vasculitis, and Behçet's disease: Evidence- and practice-based guidance

OBJECTIVE

Vasculitis are a very heterogenous group of systemic autoimmune diseases, affecting large vessels (LVV), small vessels or presenting as a multisystemic variable vessel vasculitis. We aimed to define evidence and practice-based recommendations for the use of biologics in large and small vessels vasculitis, and Behçet's disease (BD).

METHODS

Recommendations were made by an independent expert panel, following a comprehensive literature review and two consensus rounds. The panel included 17 internal medicine experts with recognized practice on autoimmune diseases management. The literature review was systematic from 2014 until 2019 and later updated by cross-reference checking and experts' input until 2022. Preliminary recommendations were drafted by working groups for each disease and voted in two rounds, in June and September 2021. Recommendations with at least 75% agreement were approved.

RESULTS

A total of 32 final recommendations (10 for LVV treatment, 7 for small vessels vasculitis and 15 for BD) were approved by the experts and several biologic drugs were considered with different supporting evidence. Among LVV treatment options, tocilizumab presents the higher level of supporting evidence. Rituximab is recommended for treatment of severe/refractory cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. Infliximab and adalimumab are most recommended in treatment of severe/refractory BD manifestations. Other biologic drugs can be considered is specific presentations.

CONCLUSION

These evidence and practice-based recommendations are a contribute to treatment decision and may, ultimately, improve the outcome of patients living with these conditions.

Indirect Comparison of Glucocorticoid-Sparing Agents for Remission Maintenance in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare and rank the effect of glucocorticoid-sparing agents in giant cell arteritis (GCA), for which several drugs have been evaluated but with a benefit-risk balance that remains uncertain.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Clinical Trials databases were searched up to November 2021; all randomized controlled trials investigating glucocorticoids in GCA were included. The glucocorticoid regimen was dichotomized into short (≤6 months) or prolonged (>6 months) use. Risk of relapse and safety were estimated using network meta-analysis with frequentist random effects models.

RESULTS

Of the 96 records screened, 8 trials were included (572 patients). The trials compared glucocorticoids and a sparing agent: tocilizumab (2 trials), oral methotrexate (3 trials), infliximab (1 trial), etanercept (1 trial), and adalimumab (1 trial). The pooled prevalence of GCA relapse was 52.6% (95% CI, 38.1 to 66.9). The risk of relapse was significantly lower with tocilizumab compared with methotrexate (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.97) and prolonged (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and short (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.66) glucocorticoid use. The risk of relapse was not significantly different with methotrexate compared with short (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.31) and prolonged (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.31 to 2.89) glucocorticoid use. The frequency of serious adverse events and serious infection was comparable between the different drugs. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that tocilizumab may be superior to other sparing agents to prevent GCA relapse, but with a low to very low certainty of evidence, and that safety is comparable to the other drugs.

REGISTRATION

The protocol of the meta-analysis is registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; registration CRD42020112387).

Advances in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis among elderly people. The clinical spectrum of the disease is heterogeneous, with a classic/cranial phenotype, and another extracranial or large vessel phenotype as the two more characteristic patterns. Permanent visual loss is the main short-term complication. Glucocorticoids (GC) remain the cornerstone of treatment. However, the percentage of relapses with GC alone is high, and the rate of adverse events affects more than 80% of patients, so it is necessary to have alternative therapeutic options, especially in patients with worse prognostic factors or high comorbidity. MTX is the only DMARD that has shown to reduce the cumulative dose of GC, while tocilizumab is the first biologic agent approved due to its ability to decrease the relapse rate and lower the cumulative GC doses. However, apart from the IL-6 pathway, there are other pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors involved in the typical intima hyperplasia and vascular remodeling of GCA. Among them, the more promising targets in GCA treatment are the IL12/IL23 axis antagonists, IL17 inhibitors, modulators of T lymphocytes, and inhibitors of either the JAK/STAT pathway, the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or the endothelin, all of which are updated in this review.

Improvement of Treg immune response after treatment with tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis

Objectives

To study the percentage, suppressive function and plasticity of Treg in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and the effects of glucocorticoids and tocilizumab.

Methods

Blood samples were obtained from 40 controls and 43 GCA patients at baseline and after treatment with glucocorticoids + IV tocilizumab (n = 20) or glucocorticoids (n = 23). Treg percentage and phenotype were assessed by flow cytometry. Suppressive function of Treg was assessed by measuring their ability to inhibit effector T‐cell (Teff) proliferation and polarisation into Th1 and Th17 cells.

Results

Treg (CD4⁺CD25^highFoxP3⁺) frequency in total CD4⁺ T cells was decreased in active GCA patients when compared to controls (2.5% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001) and increased after treatment with tocilizumab but worsened after treatment with glucocorticoids alone. Treg lacking exon 2 of FoxP3 were increased in GCA patients when compared to controls (23% vs. 10% of total Treg, P = 0.0096) and normalised after treatment with tocilizumab + glucocorticoids but not glucocorticoids alone. In GCA patients, Treg were unable to control Teff proliferation and induced ˜50% increase in the amount of IL‐17⁺ Teff, which was improved after in vitro blockade of the IL‐6 pathway by tocilizumab.

Conclusion

This study reports quantitative and functional disruptions in the regulatory immune response of GCA patients and demonstrates that, unlike glucocorticoids, tocilizumab improves Treg immune response.

Epidemiology of major relapse in giant cell arteritis: A study-level meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The relapse rate of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is around 48%. Major relapse of GCA is defined by the European League Against Rheumatism as severe ischemic or aortic (stenosis, aneurysm, or aortic dissection) disease of GCA. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence and incidence, as well as the spectrum of major relapse in GCA using published data.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2020. Studies that included patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed GCA receiving glucocorticoids (GC) alone and/or GC-sparing therapy, detailing the number of relapsing patients and the characteristics of relapses were included. The prevalence and incidence of major relapse were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies (including eight randomised controlled trials) involving 2754 patients with GCA were included. The prevalence and incidence of major relapse in this population was 3.3% (95%CI [1.7;5.6]; I² = 86%) and 14.5/100 patient-years (95%CI [5.2;27.2]; I² = 90%). The clinical manifestations were jaw claudication (44.3%), ophthalmological involvement (32.7%), peripheral limb ischemia (12.5%), aortic (7.7%), and neurological involvements (4.8%). In the meta-regression analysis, the duration of follow-up was negatively associated with the incidence of major relapse (Beta = -0.015, 95%CI [-0.026; -0.0042]; p = 0.0063). The incidence of major relapse was significantly higher in prospective studies (55.2/100 person-years, 95%CI [15.3;114.3] than in retrospective studies (4.1/100 patient-years, 95%CI[1.1;8.4]; p_interaction = 0.000.2).

CONCLUSION

This study found that there was heterogeneity among studies, and this is partially related to study design. Jaw claudication was frequent and increases the prevalence and incidence of relapses major.

Myocardial infarction during giant cell arteritis: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular risk is increased in giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to characterize myocardial infarction (MI) in a GCA cohort, and to compare the GCA and non-GCA population affected by MI.

METHODS

In patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of GCA between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2016 in Côte D'Or (France), we identified patients with MI by crossing data from the territorial myocardial infarction registry (Observatoire des Infarctus de Côte d'Or) database. Five controls (non-GCA + MI) were paired with one case (GCA + MI) after matching for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and prior cardiovascular disease. MI were characterized as type 1 MI (T1MI), resulting from thrombus formation due to atherothrombotic disease, or type 2 MI (T2MI), due to a myocardial supply/demand mismatch. GCA-related MI was defined as MI occurring within 3 months of a GCA flare (before or after).

RESULTS

Among 251 biopsy-proven GCA patients, 13 MI cases were identified and paired with 65 controls. MI was GCA-related in 6/13 cases, accounting for 2.4% (6/251) of our cohort. T2MI was more frequently GCA-related than GCA-unrelated (80% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.080), and GCA diagnosis was the only identified triggering factor in 75% of GCA-related T2MI. GCA-unrelated MI were more frequently T1MI and occurred in patients who had received a higher cumulative dose of prednisone (p = 0.032). GCA was not associated with poorer one-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

GCA-related MI are mainly T2MI probably caused by systemic inflammation rather than coronaritis. GCA-unrelated MI are predominantly T1MI associated with atherothrombotic coronary artery disease.

Improved clinical outcomes of tocilizumab versus cyclophosphamide for IgG4-related disease: insights from a prospective IgG4-related disease registry

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with active immunoglobulin G (IgG) 4 related disease (IgG4-RD) receiving tocilizumab versus those receiving cyclophosphamide (CYC).

Methods

This IgG4-RD registry study was a prospective cohort study conducted among patients with active IgG4-RD hospitalized at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Patients who were treated with tocilizumab or CYC along with glucocorticoids (GCs) were enrolled. All participants were followed up at the hospital clinic at 3 and 6 months after discharge. Primary clinical outcomes were measured via the IgG4-RD responder index (RI), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), as well as side effects.

Results

From January 2015 to June 2020, 29 patients enrolled. Fourteen and 15 patients were treated with tocilizumab and CYC, respectively. At the 6-month follow-up, disease activity parameters including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), IgG4, and IgG4-RD RI, decreased significantly in both groups. At 6 months, tocilizumab demonstrated its superiority, with 50% of patients achieving CR in the Tocilizumab group versus 20% in the CYC group. However, no statistical significance was identified (p = 0.128). The GC dosage at 6 months was significantly lower in the tocilizumab group than in the CYC group [10 (9.4-15) mg/d versus 15 (15-15) mg/d, p = 0.025]. In the CYC group, two patients experienced lumbar vertebral compression fractures related to GCs. Other patients in both groups showed mild adverse effects.

Conclusions

Tocilizumab could be a better steroid-sparing agent, with a comparable curative effect and tolerance, than CYC, in the treatment of IgG4-RD.

Efficacy and safety of steroid-sparing treatments in giant cell arteritis according to the glucocorticoids tapering regimen: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies in newly diagnosed or relapsing giant cell arteritis (GCA) in terms of relapse rate at week 52 (primary outcome) and to assess the impact of GC tapering regimen on adjuvant effectiveness.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, trial registries, from inception to November 2020. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled prospective studies evaluating adjuvant treatments in GCA, without date or language restriction. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Quality of evidence was summarised with GRADE.

RESULTS

Of the 680 records identified, 16 studies were included (1,068 participants) evaluating various adjuvant therapies compared to GC only. No study compared adjuvants with each other. Risk of bias was high in 5/7 trials evaluating our primary outcome. Risk of relapse at week 52 was reduced for only the anti-IL6 and IL6-receptor drug class versus the control (RR=0.45, 95%CI 0.30-0.66, I2=38%), particularly tocilizumab (RR=0.38, 95%CI 0.23-0.63, I2=42%) with a moderate quality of evidence. We found no significant interaction according to GC tapering regimen. Our meta-analysis did not show a significant benefit for methotrexate. Except for dapsone, ciclosporine and hydroxychloroquine, other adjuvants did not seem to show increased risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab seems to reduce the relapse rate in GCA at week 52 but the quality of evidence was moderate. No other molecule has shown efficacy. No significant interaction on relapse rate by GC tapering regimen was found.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020172011.

Giant cell arteritis with ocular involvement successfully treated with tocilizumab and very short-course glucocorticoids: A case report

PURPOSE

To report the case of a patient with arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION) with a history of glucocorticoids (GC) hypersensitivity treated with monthly intravenous tocilizumab (IV TCZ) and short course of GC.

CASE REPORT

A 71-year-old Caucasian patient presented with AAION related to giant cell arteritis (GCA) confirmed by temporal artery biopsy. Past medical history was significant for GC hypersensitivity proven by allergy evaluation and the patient was managed with IV TCZ and very short-course GC.

CONCLUSION

TCZ therapy with very short-course GC could be effective in GCA with ophthalmic involvement as a first-line strategy. Clinical trials are needed for thorough evaluation of the efficiency of TCZ as a first-line treatment to induce and maintain remission in patients with GCA and ocular involvement.

Pharmacological mechanism of immunomodulatory agents for the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19 infection

OBJECTIVE

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a world-wide pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To date, treatment of severe COVID-19 is far from clear. Therefore, it is urgent to develop an effective option for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Most patients with severe COVID-19 exhibit markedly increased serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, and interleukin (IL)-1β. Immunotherapeutic strategies have an important role in the suppression of cytokine storm and respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

A systematic search in the literature was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, as well as Google Scholar preprint database using all available MeSH terms for Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, anti-rheumatoid agents, COVID-19, cytokine storm, immunotherapeutic drugs, IFN, interleukin, JAK/STAT inhibitors, MCP, MIP, TNF.

RESULTS

Here, we first review common complications of COVID-19 patients, particularly neurological symptoms. We next explain host immune responses against COVID-19 particles. Finally, we summarize the existing experimental and clinical immunotherapeutic strategies, particularly anti-rheumatoid agents and also plasma (with a high level of gamma globulin) therapy for severe COVID-19 patients. We discuss both their therapeutic effects and side effects that should be taken into consideration for their clinical application.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that immunosuppressants, such as anti-rheumatoid drugs, could be considered as a potential approach for the treatment of cytokine storm in severe cases of COVID-19. One possible limitation of immunosuppressant therapy is their inhibitory effects on host anti-viral immune response. So, the appropriate timing of administration should be carefully considered.

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sirukumab in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirukumab in giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-part phase 3 trial (NCT02531633; Part A [52-week double-blind treatment]; Part B [104-week follow-up]), patients with GCA were randomised (3:3:2:2:2) to sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks plus 6-month or 3-month prednisone taper, sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks plus 6-month prednisone taper, or placebo every 2 weeks plus 6-month or 12-month prednisone taper. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in sustained remission at week 52. Secondary endpoints included disease flare and safety. The study was terminated early (October 2017; sponsor decision).

RESULTS

Of 161 patients randomised (sirukumab: n = 107; placebo: n = 54), 28 (17.4%) completed week 52 (median treatment duration: 24-30 weeks). In a revised intent-to-treat (ITT) subgroup (completed week 52 or discontinued before study termination [n = 55]); six patients (all receiving sirukumab) achieved the primary endpoint. In the ITT population (n = 161), the proportion of patients with flares (week 2-52) was lower with sirukumab (18.4-30.8%) than placebo (37.0-40.0%). The proportion of patients with flares (week 2-12) was highest with sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks plus 3-month prednisone taper (23.1%). In Part A, 94.4% of patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 19.3% reported serious TEAEs. The proportions of patients with TEAEs were generally similar across treatment arms. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although data were limited due to early termination and shortened treatment duration, sirukumab treatment resulted in numerically lower proportions of patients with flare by week 52 versus placebo, with no unexpected safety findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02531633.

In vitro IL-6/IL-6R Trans-Signaling in Fibroblasts Releases Cytokines That May Be Linked to the Pathogenesis of IgG4-Related Disease

Background: The remarkable mechanisms of storiform fibrosis and the formation of high levels of IgG4 with a pathogenic germinal center (GC) in the inflammatory tissue of IgG4-RD remains unknown and may be responsible for the unsatisfactory therapeutic effect on IgG4-related diseases when using conventional therapy.

Objectives: To investigate the mechanisms of interleukin 6 (IL-6) inducing fibroblasts to produce cytokines for pathogenic GC formation in the development of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD).

Methods: The clinical data and laboratory examinations of 56 patients with IgG4-RD were collected. IL-6 and IL-6R expression in the serum and tissues of patients with IgG4-RD and healthy controls were detected by ELISA, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. Human aorta adventitial fibroblasts (AAFs) were cultured and stimulated with IL-6/IL-6 receptor (IL-6R). The effect of IL-6/IL-6R on AAFs was determined by Luminex assays.

Results: The serum IL-6 and IL-6R levels were elevated in active IgG4-RD patients and IL-6 was positively correlated with the disease activity (e.g., erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C-reactive protein [CRP], and IgG4-RD responder index). IL-6 and IL-6R expression in the tissue lesions of IgG4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis and IgG4-related sialadenitis patients were also significantly higher than that in the normal tissues. In addition, there is a relative abundance of myofibroblasts as well as IgG4⁺ plasma cells in the tissues of IgG4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis. α-SMA and B cell differentiation cytokines (i.e., B cell activating factor), and α-SMA and T follicular helper (Tfh) cell differentiation cytokines (e.g., IL-7, IL-12, and IL-23) were co-expressed in the local lesions. In vitro, IL-6/IL-6R significantly promoted the production of B cell activating factor, IL-7, IL-12, and IL-23 in AAFs in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was partially blocked by JAK1, JAK2, STAT3, and Akt inhibitors, respectively.

Conclusions:In vitro IL-6/IL-6R trans-signaling in fibroblasts releases Tfh and B cell differentiation factors partially via the JAK2/STAT3, JAK1/STAT3, and JAK2/Akt pathways, which may be linked to the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD. This indicated that IL-6 and fibroblasts may be responsible for GC formation and fibrosis in the development of IgG4-RD. Blocking IL-6 with JAK1/2 inhibitors or inhibiting fibroblast proliferation might be beneficial for IgG4-RD treatment.

Rational Use of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia

Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) has broken out in Wuhan, China and spread rapidly. Recent studies have found that ⁓ 15.7% of patients develop severe pneumonia, and cytokine storm is an important factor leading to rapid disease progression. Currently, there are no specific drugs for COVID-19 and the cytokine storm it causes. IL-6 is one of the key cytokines involved in infection-induced cytokine storm. Tocilizumab, which is the IL-6 receptor antagonist, has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), is expected to treat cytokine storm caused by COVID-19 and is now in clinical trials. In this paper, we will elaborate the role of cytokine storm in COVID-19, the mechanism of tocilizumab on cytokine storm and the key points of pharmaceutical care based on the actual clinical application for COVID-19 in our hospital, the latest research reports, clinical trial progress of tocilizumab, drug instruction from the US FDA, and "Diagnosis and Treatment Plan of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (seventh trial edition)" in China, so as to provide reference for the treatment of COVID-19.

Giant Cell Arteritis: The Experience of Two Collaborative Referral Centers and an Overview of Disease Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Advancements

Purpose

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), a chronic vasculitis of the large and medium-sized arteries, affects people >50 years of age. This study assessed the prevalence of visual manifestations and other clinical features at presentation in an Italian cohort of GCA patients. Recent advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy of GCA are also reviewed.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study conducted by the ophthalmology and internal medicine clinics of one university recruited 56 patients from 2005 to 2016 and followed them for 11-54 months.

Results

Ocular involvement was diagnosed in 19 patients (33.9%), with permanent vision loss in 19.6% (7.1% of the cohort with bilateral vision loss). Arteritic anterior and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy were diagnosed in 11 patients (57.9%) and 1 patient (5.3%), respectively, cotton wool spots in 3 patients (15.8%), central retinal artery occlusion in 2 patients (10.5%), and anterior segment ischemia and multifocal choroidal ischemia in 1 patient each (5.3%). Polymyalgia rheumatica was associated with GCA in 44.6% of the patients. The most common extra-ocular manifestation was constitutional symptoms (82.1% of the patients). Large-vessel involvement, including of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and left axillary artery, was diagnosed by magnetic resonance or computed tomography (CT) angiography and ¹⁸FDG positron emission/CT. Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the standard-of-care worldwide, but methotrexate, provided as a steroid-sparing drug in 41% of the patients, resulted in earlier tapering, a lower cumulative dose of GCs, and a lower rate of relapse. Among the combinations of GCs and immunosuppressive drugs proposed to treat GCA, only tocilizumab has effectively induced and maintained disease remission.

Conclusion

According to our data and literature reports: a) GCA is a systemic disease; b) its diagnosis is expedited by the adjunct use of imaging techniques; c) insights into the pathogenesis of GCA may allow an improved, differentiated therapeutic approach.

[Treatment of giant cell arteritis]

Glucocorticoids (GC) remain the gold standard of the treatment of giant cell arteritis provided objectives of GC-tapering are accurately followed: 15 to 20mg/day at 3 months, 10mg/day at 6 months, 5mg/day at 9-12 months and withdrawal between 12 and 18 months. In case of corticodependance at ≥7.5 mg/day of prednisone or intolerance to GC, a GCsparing therapy has to be introduced, mainly methotrexate or tocilizumab. Individual characteristics of each patient, data about the efficacy of the treatment, its cost and how easy the follow-up under this treatment is are important factors to consider for choosing the right GC-sparing therapy. For all these reasons, except particular situations, we prefer using methotrexate before tocilizumab. Prevention of cardiovascular events is an important aspect of the treatment of GCA. We recommend using aspirin (75-100mg/day) during the first month of treatment or longer in case of occurrence of an ischemic complication. Each patient treated for GCA should receive a prevention of osteoporosis with respect of usual recommendations.