Recent findings leading to the discovery of selective dopamine D4 receptor ligands for the treatment of widespread diseases

Computer-Aided Design and Biological Evaluation of Diazaspirocyclic D4R Antagonists

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, resulting in motor dysfunction. Current treatments are primarily centered around enhancing dopamine signaling or providing dopamine replacement therapy and face limitations such as reduced efficacy over time and adverse side effects. To address these challenges, we identified selective dopamine receptor subtype 4 (D4R) antagonists not previously reported as potential adjuvants for PD management. In this study, a library screening and artificial neural network quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling with experimentally driven library design resulted in a class of spirocyclic compounds to identify candidate D4R antagonists. However, developing selective D4R antagonists suitable for clinical translation remains a challenge.

Adopting the Rumsfeld approach to understanding the action of levodopa and apomorphine in Parkinson's disease

Dopaminergic therapies dominate the treatment of the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but there have been no major advances in therapy in many decades. Two of the oldest drugs used appear more effective than others-levodopa and apomorphine-but the reasons for this are seldom discussed and this may be one cause for a lack of progress. This short review questions current thinking on drug action and looks at whether adopting the philosophy of ex-US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld reveals 'unknown' aspects of the actions of levodopa and apomorphine that provide clues for a way forward. It appears that both levodopa and apomorphine have a more complex pharmacology than classical views would suggest. In addition, there are unexpected facets to the mechanisms through which levodopa acts that are either forgotten as 'known unknowns' or ignored as 'unknown unknowns'. The conclusion reached is that we may not know as much as we think about drug action in PD and there is a case for looking beyond the obvious.

Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential of Benzothiazole Analogues for Cocaine Use Disorder

Pharmacological targeting of the dopamine D4 receptor (D4R)─expressed in brain regions that control cognition, attention, and decision-making─could be useful for several neuropsychiatric disorders including substance use disorders (SUDs). This study focused on the synthesis and evaluation of a novel series of benzothiazole analogues designed to target D4R. We identified several compounds with high D4R binding affinity (Ki ≤ 6.9 nM) and >91-fold selectivity over other D2-like receptors (D2R, D3R) with diverse partial agonist and antagonist profiles. Novel analogue 16f is a potent low-efficacy D4R partial agonist, metabolically stable in rat and human liver microsomes, and has excellent brain penetration in rats (AUCbrain/plasma > 3). 16f (5-30 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently decreased iv cocaine self-administration in rats, consistent with previous results produced by D4R-selective antagonists. Off-target antagonism of 5-HT2A or 5-HT2B may also contribute to these effects. Results with 16f support further efforts to target D4R in SUD treatment.

Exploring Structural Determinants of Bias among D4 Subtype-Selective Dopamine Receptor Agonists

The high affinity dopamine D₄ receptor ligand APH199 and derivatives thereof exhibit bias toward the G_i signaling pathway over β-arrestin recruitment compared to quinpirole. Based on APH199, two novel groups of D₄ subtype selective ligands were designed and evaluated, in which the original benzyl phenylsemicarbazide substructure was replaced by either a biphenylmethyl urea or a biphenyl urea moiety. Functional assays revealed a range of different bias profiles among the newly synthesized compounds, namely, with regard to efficacy, potency, and GRK2 dependency, in which bias factors range from 1 to over 300 and activation from 15% to over 98% compared to quinpirole. These observations demonstrate that within bias, an even more precise tuning toward a particular profile is possible, which─in a general sense─could become an important aspect in future drug development. Docking studies enabled further insight into the role of the ECL2 and the EPB in the emergence of bias, thereby taking advantage of the diversity of functionally selective D₄ agonists now available.

Highly Potent and Selective Dopamine D4 Receptor Antagonists Potentially Useful for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

To better understand the role of dopamine D₄ receptor (D₄R) in glioblastoma (GBM), in the present paper, new ligands endowed with high affinity and selectivity for D₄R were discovered starting from the brain penetrant and D₄R selective lead compound 1-(3-(4-phenylpiperazin-1-yl)propyl)-3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one (6). In particular, the D₄R antagonist 24, showing the highest affinity and selectivity over D₂R and D₃R within the series (D₂/D₄ = 8318, D₃/D₄ = 3715), and the biased ligand 29, partially activating D₄R G_i-/G_o-protein and blocking β-arrestin recruitment, emerged as the most interesting compounds. These compounds, evaluated for their GBM antitumor activity, induced a decreased viability of GBM cell lines and primary GBM stem cells (GSC#83), with the maximal efficacy being reached at a concentration of 10 μM. Interestingly, the treatment with both compounds 24 and 29 induced an increased effect in reducing the cell viability with respect to temozolomide, which is the first-choice chemotherapeutic drug in GBM.

Association Between DRD2 and DRD4 Polymorphisms and Eating Disorders in an Italian Population

Anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED) are the three most common eating disorders (EDs). Their etiopathogenesis is multifactorial where both the environmental and genetic factors contribute to the disease outcome and severity. Several polymorphisms in genes involved in the dopaminergic pathways seem to be relevant in the susceptibility to EDs, but their role has not been fully elucidated yet. In this study, we have analyzed the association between selected common polymorphisms in the DRD2 and DRD4 genes in a large cohort of Italian patients affected by AN (n = 332), BN (n = 122), and BED (n = 132) compared to healthy controls (CTRs) (n = 172). Allelic and genotypic frequencies have been also correlated with the main psychopathological and clinical comorbidities often observed in patients. Our results showed significant associations of the DRD2-rs6277 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with AN and BN, of the DRD4-rs936461 SNP with BN and BED and of DRD4 120-bp tandem repeat (TR) polymorphism (SS plus LS genotypes) with BED susceptibility. Moreover, genotyping of DRD4 48-bp variable number TR (VNTR) identified the presence of ≥7R alleles as risk factors to develop each type of EDs. The study also showed that ED subjects with a history of drugs abuse were characterized by a significantly higher frequency of the DRD4 rs1800955 TT genotype and DRD4 120-bp TR short-allele. Our findings suggest that specific combinations of variants in the DRD2 and DRD4 genes are predisposing factors not only for EDs but also for some psychopathological features often coupled specifically to AN, BN, and BED. Further functional research studies are needed to better clarify the complex role of these proteins and to develop novel therapeutic compounds based on dopamine modulation.