Non-invasive embryo evaluation and selection using time-lapse monitoring: Results of a randomized controlled study

Do IVF culture conditions have an impact on neonatal outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Are embryo culture conditions, including type of incubator, oxygen tension, and culture media, associated with obstetric or neonatal complications following in vitro fertilization (IVF)?

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed from January 01, 2008, until October 31, 2021. The studies reporting quantitative data on at least one of the primary outcomes (birthweight and preterm birth) for the exposure group and the control group were included. For oxygen tension, independent meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, comparing hypoxia/normoxia. For culture media, a network meta-analysis was carried out using R software, allowing the inclusion of articles comparing two or more culture media.

RESULTS

After reviewing 182 records, 39 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 28 studies were kept for review. Meta-analysis about the impact of incubator type on perinatal outcomes could not be carried out because of a limited number of studies. For oxygen tension, three studies were included. The pairwise meta-analysis comparing hypoxia/normoxia did not show any statistical difference for birthweight and gestational age at birth. For culture media, 18 studies were included. The network meta-analysis failed to reveal any significant impact of different culture media on birthweight or preterm birth.

CONCLUSION

No difference was observed for neonatal outcomes according to the embryo culture conditions evaluated in this review. Further research is needed about the safety of IVF culture conditions as far as future children's health is concerned.

The effect of embryo selection using time-lapse monitoring on IVF/ICSI outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To explore the effect of embryo selection using the time-lapse monitoring (TLM) system compared with conventional morphological selection (CMS) on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) outcomes.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid-Embase, and The Cochrane Library for the following studies: At Comparison 1, embryo selection using TLM images in a TLM incubator based on morphology versus embryo selection using CMS in a conventional incubator based on morphology; at Comparison 2, embryo selection using TLM based on morphokinetics versus embryo selection using CMS based on morphology. The primary outcomes were the live birth rate (LBR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and implantation rate (IR), and the secondary outcome was the miscarriage rate (MR).

RESULTS

A total of 14 randomized control trials (RCTs) were included. Both based on morphology, TLM incubators increased the IR (risk ratio [RR]: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.18; I2  = 0%, moderate-quality evidence) compared to conventional incubators. Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that TLM incubators did not improve LBR, OPR, CPR, and MR compared to conventional incubators. In addition, low- to moderate-quality evidence indicates that embryo selection using TLM based on morphokinetics did not improve LBR, OPR, CPR, IR, or MR compared to CMS based on morphology.

CONCLUSIONS

Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that neither TLM incubators nor embryo selection using TLM based on morphokinetics improved clinical outcomes (LBR, OPR, CPR, and MR) compared with CMS based on morphology. TLM is still an investigational procedure for IVF/ICSI practice.

Effects of different oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo development and euploidy: a sibling oocyte control study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the relationship between cytoplasmic granulation patterns and the developmental potential of mature sibling oocytes.

METHODS

Data from 54 cycles of preimplantation genetic tests for structural rearrangement from July 2019 to June 2022 were analyzed. In total, 564 embryos were cultured using a time-lapse system. Sibling oocytes were divided into four groups based on cytoplasmic granulation patterns: fine granulation (FG) group (n = 177), central granulation (CG) group (n = 183), dispersed granulation (DG) group (n = 161), and uneven granulation (UG) group (n = 43). The CG group was further divided into three groups (grades I, II, and III) based on the tertile of the ratio of central granular distribution area to oocyte area. Fertilization rate, embryo morphokinetics, chromosomal ploidy, and clinical outcomes of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in morphokinetic parameters, fertilization rate, embryo production, blastocyst formation, and aneuploidy rates among the different cytoplasmic-granulation pattern groups. However, embryos derived from CG oocytes showed significantly higher aneuploidy rates in grade III compared to grade I (86.21% vs 61.54%, P = 0.036) or grade II (86.21% vs 56.00%, P = 0.013). Thirty embryos were transferred to the uteri of female patients and the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not significantly differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoplasmic granulation patterns may not affect embryo fertilization, development speed, and aneuploidy rates. However, a higher grade of CG may be associated with increased aneuploidy rates. Larger sample sizes are required to explore the impact of oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo implantation potential.

The importance of cytoplasmic strings during early human embryonic development

Objectives: During human in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatments, embryologists attempt to select the most viable embryos for embryo transfer (ET). Previously, embryos were evaluated based on light microscopic morphological parameters. However, this is currently accomplished by morphokinetic analysis of time-lapse recordings. This technique provides us the opportunity to observe cytoplasmic strings at the blastocyst stage. The aim of this work was to examine the relationship between the presence of cytoplasmic strings (CS) and the embryo viability in human in vitro fertilised embryos. Study design: Herein, we present an evaluation of the morphokinetic data on the development of embryos obtained during IVF treatments performed at the Division of Assisted Reproduction between December 2020 and March 2021. The dynamics of embryo development, embryo morphology, and morphokinetic scores generated by a time-lapse system were compared between the presence of cytoplasmic strings (CS+) and their absence (CS-) at the blastocyst stage. Results: The development of 208 embryos from 78 patients was examined. Moreover, 81.2% of the embryos had CS in the blastocyst stage; 77% of CS existed in embryos created by conventional IVF, while 86% of CS existed in embryos fertilised by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (p = 0.08). A greater number of CS+ embryos developed into a higher quality blastocyst (52.1% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.02). The morphokinetic score values characterising the development of embryos, such as Known Implantation Data Score (KIDScore) and Intelligent Data Analysis (iDAScore), were higher in CS+ groups (KID: 6.1 ± 2.1 vs. 4.7 ± 2.07; iDA: 8.0 ± 1.9 vs. 6.8 ± 2.3, p < 0.01). The dynamics of the early embryo development were similar between the two groups; however, CS+ embryos reached the blastocyst stage significantly earlier (tB: 103.9 h vs. tB: 107.6 h; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Based on our results, the number of embryos with cytoplasmic strings was higher than that without cytoplasmic strings, and its presence is not related to the fertilisation method. These embryos reached the blastocyst stage earlier, and their morphokinetic (KIDScore and iDAScore) parameters were better. All these results suggest that the presence of CS indicates higher embryo viability. The examination of this feature may help us make decisions about the embryos with higher implantation potential.

Clinical outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted standard culture (SelecTIMO): a three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Time-lapse monitoring is increasingly used in fertility laboratories to culture and select embryos for transfer. This method is offered to couples with the promise of improving pregnancy chances, even though there is currently insufficient evidence for superior clinical results. We aimed to evaluate whether a potential improvement by time-lapse monitoring is caused by the time-lapse-based embryo selection method itself or the uninterrupted culture environment that is part of the system.

METHODS

In this three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, couples undergoing in-vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were recruited from 15 fertility clinics in the Netherlands and randomly assigned using a web-based, computerised randomisation service to one of three groups. Couples and physicians were masked to treatment group, but embryologists and laboratory technicians could not be. The time-lapse early embryo viability assessment (EEVA; TLE) group received embryo selection based on the EEVA time-lapse selection method and uninterrupted culture. The time-lapse routine (TLR) group received routine embryo selection and uninterrupted culture. The control group received routine embryo selection and interrupted culture. The co-primary endpoints were the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate within 12 months in all women and the ongoing pregnancy rate after fresh single embryo transfer in a good prognosis population. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered on the ICTRP Search Portal, NTR5423, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

1731 couples were randomly assigned between June 15, 2017, and March 31, 2020 (577 to the TLE group, 579 to the TLR group, and 575 to the control group). The 12-month cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the three groups: 50·8% (293 of 577) in the TLE group, 50·9% (295 of 579) in the TLR group, and 49·4% (284 of 575) in the control group (p=0·85). The ongoing pregnancy rates after fresh single embryo transfer in a good prognosis population were 38·2% (125 of 327) in the TLE group, 36·8% (119 of 323) in the TLR group, and 37·8% (123 of 325) in the control group (p=0·90). Ten serious adverse events were reported (five TLE, four TLR, and one in the control group), which were not related to study procedures.

INTERPRETATION

Neither time-lapse-based embryo selection using the EEVA test nor uninterrupted culture conditions in a time-lapse incubator improved clinical outcomes compared with routine methods. Widespread application of time-lapse monitoring for fertility treatments with the promise of improved results should be questioned.

FUNDING

Health Care Efficiency Research programme from Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and Merck.

Non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality for the selection of transferable embryos in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

The ultimate goal of human assisted reproductive technology is to achieve a healthy pregnancy and birth, ideally from the selection and transfer of a single competent embryo. Recently, techniques for efficiently evaluating the state and quality of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse imaging systems have been applied. Artificial intelligence programs based on deep learning technology and big data analysis of time-lapse monitoring system during in vitro culture of preimplantation embryos have also been rapidly developed. In addition, several molecular markers of the secretome have been successfully analyzed in spent embryo culture media, which could easily be obtained during in vitro embryo culture. It is also possible to analyze small amounts of cell-free nucleic acids, mitochondrial nucleic acids, miRNA, and long non-coding RNA derived from embryos using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or digital PCR, as well as next-generation sequencing. Various efforts are being made to use non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality (NiEEQ) to select the embryo with the best developmental competence. However, each NiEEQ method has some limitations that should be evaluated case by case. Therefore, an integrated analysis strategy fusing several NiEEQ methods should be urgently developed and confirmed by proper clinical trials.

The Impact of Culture Medium on Morphokinetics of Cleavage Stage Embryos: An Observational Study

To study the impact of culture media on preimplantation morphokinetics used for predicting clinical outcomes. All IVF and ICSI cycles performed between 2012 and 2017 with time-lapse information available were included. In November 2014, culture medium was changed from Vitrolife G-1 PLUS to SAGE 1-Step. Each embryo was retrospectively assigned a morphokinetic-based KIDScore for prediction of implantation. Clinical outcomes were retrieved from medical records. Linear mixed models were used to study differences in morphokinetic parameters, a proportional odds model for KIDScore ranking and logistic regression for differences in clinical outcomes. All analyses were adjusted for patient and treatment characteristics. In 253 (63.1%) cycles, embryos (n = 671) were cultured in Vitrolife, and in 148 (36.9%) cycles, embryos (n = 517) were cultured in SAGE. All cleavage divisions occurred earlier for SAGE embryos than for Vitrolife embryos (2-cell: -2.28 (95%CI: -3.66, -0.89), 3-cell: -2.34 (95%CI: -4.00, -0.64), 4-cell: -2.41 (95%CI: -4.11, -0.71), 5-cell: -2.54 (95%CI: -4.90, -0.18), 6-cell: -3.58 (95%CI: -6.08, -1.08), 7-cell: -5.62 (95%CI: -8.80, -2.45) and 8-cell: -5.32 (95%CI: -9.21, -1.42) hours, respectively). Significantly more embryos cultured in SAGE classified for the highest KIDScore compared to embryos cultured in Vitrolife (p < 0.001). No differences were observed in clinical outcomes. Our results demonstrate an impact of culture medium on preimplantation embryo developmental kinetics, which affects classification within the KIDScore algorithm, while pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the groups. This study underscores the need to include the type of culture medium in the development of morphokinetic-based embryo selection tools.

Noninvasive embryo evaluation and selection by time-lapse monitoring vs. conventional morphologic assessment in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a single-center randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether time-lapse monitoring (TLM) for cleavage-stage embryo selection improves reproductive outcomes in comparison with conventional morphological assessment (CMA) selection.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single academic center.

PATIENTS

We randomly assigned 139 women who were undergoing their first in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle to undergo either fresh embryo transfer or first frozen embryo transfer (FET). Only 1 cleavage-stage embryo was transferred to each participant.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomly assigned to either the CMA or the TLM group. In the CMA group, day 2 and day 3 embryos were observed. A good-quality cleavage-stage embryo was selected for transfer or freezing in both groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary and secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and the live birth rate (LBR), respectively, after the first embryo transfer (fresh embryo transfer or FET).

RESULTS

The CPR and LBR were significantly lower in the TLM group than in the CMA group (CPR: 49.18% vs. 70.42%; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.94; LBR: 45.90% vs. 64.79%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.98). The CPR with fresh embryo transfer or FET did not significantly differ between the TLM and the CMA groups (fresh embryo transfer: 44.44% vs. 70.0%, relative risk, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.39-1.03; FET: 52.94% vs. 70.73%, relative risk, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.52-1.09). There was a significant difference in the LBR with fresh embryo transfer between the TLM and the CMA groups (40.74% vs. 66.67%; relative risk, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.03). The LBRs with FET were similar in the TLM and the CMA groups (50.0% vs. 63.41%; relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.52-1.19). The rates of early spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy did not differ between the TLM and the CMA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer with TLM-based selection did not have any advantages over CMA when day 2 and day 3 embryo morphology was combined in young women with a good ovarian reserve. Because of these results, we conclude that TLM remains an investigational procedure for in vitro fertilization practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900021981.

Nomogram based on clinical and laboratory characteristics of euploid embryos using the data in PGT-A: a euploid-prediction model

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of embryo morphology may be inaccurate. A euploid prediction model is needed to provide the best and individualized counseling about embryo selection based on patients and embryo characteristics.

METHODS

Our objective was to develop a euploid-prediction model for evaluating blastocyst embryos, based on data from a large cohort of patients undergoing pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). This retrospective, single-center cohort study included data from 1610 blastocysts which were performed PGT-A with known genetic outcomes. The study population was divided into the training and validation cohorts in a 3:1 ratio. The performance of the euploid-prediction model was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). In addition, a nomogram was drawn to provide quantitative and convenient tools in predicting euploid.

RESULTS

We developed a reliable euploid-prediction model and can directly assess the probability of euploid with the AUC (95%CI) of 0.859 (0.834,0.872) in the training cohort, and 0.852 (0.831,0.879) in the validation cohort, respectively. The euploid-prediction model showed sensitivities of 0.903 and specificities of 0.578.

CONCLUSIONS

The euploid-prediction model is a reliable prediction model and can directly assess the probability of euploid.

The impact of endometriosis on embryo morphokinetics: embryos from endometriosis patients exhibit delayed cell cycle milestones and decreased blastulation rates

PURPOSE

To compare morphokinetic parameters in embryos obtained from women with and without endometriosis.

METHODS

We evaluated a total of 3471 embryos resulting from 434 oocyte retrievals performed at a single academic center. One thousand seventy-eight embryos were obtained from women affected by endometriosis and 2393 came from unaffected controls. All embryos were cultured in a time-lapse incubator chamber for up to 6 days. IVF cycle outcomes and morphokinetic parameters collected prospectively were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Morphokinetic data suggest that embryo development is impaired in embryos obtained from women with endometriosis (EE). EE were slower to achieve the 2-8 cell stages compared to control embryos (CE) (p < 0.001); additionally, time to compaction was delayed compared to CE (p = 0.015). The timing of late developmental events, including morulation and blastulation was also delayed in the endometriosis cohort (p < 0.001). In addition to demonstrating delayed cell cycle milestones, EE were less likely than controls to progress to morula, blastocyst, and expanded blastocyst stages (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a smaller proportion of embryos in the endometriosis group fell into optimal kinetic ranges for cc2 (p = 0.003), t5 (p = 0.019), tSB (p < 0.001), and tEB (p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy or live birth rates between groups.

CONCLUSION

Embryos from endometriosis patients demonstrate impairments in both early and late developmental events, and progress to the morula, blastocyst, and expanded blastocyst stages at lower rates than control embryos. Despite these differences, IVF outcomes are similar for patients with and without endometriosis.

Can Time-Lapse Incubation and Monitoring Be Beneficial to Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Day 3 Double Embryo Transfer

Objective: To determine if the application of time-lapse incubation and monitoring can be beneficial to clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Methods: A total of 600 patients were equally randomized to three groups, namely, conventional embryo culture and standard morphological selection (CM group), time-lapse culture and standard morphological selection (TLM group), and time-lapse culture and morphokinetic selection (TLA group). Notably, 424 undergoing fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles were analyzed, 132 patients in the CM group, 158 in the TLM group, and 134 in the TLA group. Main outcomes included clinical outcomes, embryo development rates, and perinatal outcomes.

Results: Clinical pregnancy rates in the time-lapse groups were significantly higher than in the CM group (CM 65.2% vs. TLM 77.2% vs. TLA 81.3%). Implantation rates and live birth rates were significantly higher for the TLA group (59.7 and 70.9%) compared with the CM group (47.7 and 56.1%) but not compared with the TLM group (55.4 and 67.1%). There was no statistical difference in miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates among the three groups. Overall, birth weight was significantly higher in the time-lapse groups (CM 2,731.7 ± 644.8 g vs. TLM 3,066.5 ± 595.4 g vs. TLA 2,967.4 ± 590.0 g). The birth height of newborns in the TLM group was significantly longer than that of the CM group and TLA group (CM 48.3± 4.4 cm vs. TLM 49.8± 2.3 cm vs. TLA 48.5± 2.7 cm).

Conclusion: Time-lapse incubation and monitoring have a significant benefit on clinical pregnancy rates and on overall birth weights while morphokinetic analysis is not necessary.

Clinical Trial Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02974517].

OUP accepted manuscript

STUDY QUESTION

Can use of a commercially available time-lapse algorithm for Day 5 blastocyst selection improve pregnancy rates compared with morphology alone?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The use of a time-lapse selection model to choose blastocysts for fresh single embryo transfer on Day 5 did not improve ongoing pregnancy rate compared to morphology alone.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Evidence from time-lapse monitoring suggests correlations between timing of key developmental events and embryo viability. No good quality evidence exists to support improved pregnancy rates following time-lapse selection.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial including 776 randomized patients was performed between 2018 and 2021. Patients with at least two good quality blastocysts on Day 5 were allocated by a computer randomization program in a proportion of 1:1 into either the control group, whereby single blastocysts were selected for transfer by morphology alone, or the intervention group whereby final selection was decided by a commercially available time-lapse model. The embryologists at the time of blastocyst morphological scoring were blinded to which study group the patients would be randomized, and the physician and patients were blind to which group they were allocated until after the primary outcome was known. The primary outcome was number of ongoing pregnancies in the two groups.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

From 10 Nordic IVF clinics, 776 patients with a minimum of two good quality blastocysts on Day 5 (D5) were randomized into one of the two study groups. A commercial time-lapse model decided the final selection of blastocysts for 387 patients in the intervention (time-lapse) group, and blastocysts with the highest morphological score were transferred for 389 patients in the control group. Only single embryo transfers in fresh cycles were performed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the full analysis set, the ongoing pregnancy rate for the time-lapse group was 47.4% (175/369) and 48.1% (181/376) in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups: mean difference −0.7% (95% CI −8.2, 6.7, P = 0.90). Pregnancy rate (60.2% versus 59.0%, mean difference 1.1%, 95% CI −6.2, 8.4, P = 0.81) and early pregnancy loss (21.2% versus 18.5%, mean difference 2.7%, 95% CI −5.2, 10.6, P = 0.55) were the same for the time-lapse and the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that patient and treatment characteristics did not significantly affect the commercial time-lapse model D5 performance. In the time-lapse group, the choice of best blastocyst changed on 42% of occasions (154/369, 95% CI 36.9, 47.2) after the algorithm was applied, and this rate was similar for most treatment clinics.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

During 2020, the patient recruitment rate slowed down at participating clinics owing to coronavirus disease-19 restrictions, so the target sample size was not achieved as planned and it was decided to stop the trial prematurely. The study only investigated embryo selection at the blastocyst stage on D5 in fresh IVF transfer cycles. In addition, only blastocysts of good morphological quality were considered for transfer, limiting the number of embryos for selection in both groups: also, it could be argued that this manual preselection of blastocysts limits the theoretical selection power of time-lapse, as well as restricting the results mainly to a good prognosis patient group. Most patients were aimed for blastocyst stage transfer when a minimum of five zygotes were available for extended culture. Finally, the primary clinical outcome evaluated was pregnancy to only 6–8 weeks.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study suggests that time-lapse selection with a commercially available time-lapse model does not increase chance of ongoing pregnancy after single blastocyst transfer on Day 5 compared to morphology alone.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was financed by a grant from the Swedish state under the ALF-agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils (ALFGBG-723141). Vitrolife supported the study with embryo culture dishes and culture media. During the study period, T.H. changed his employment from Livio AB to Vitrolife AB. All other authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03445923.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

26 February 2018.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

11 June 2018.

Body mass index, not race, may be associated with an alteration in early embryo morphokinetics during in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between maternal body mass index (BMI) and embryo morphokinetics on time-lapse microscopy (TLM).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

All IVF cycles between June 2015 and April 2017 were reviewed. Female BMI prior to egg retrieval was collected through chart review. BMI (kg/m2) classification included underweight (< 18.5), normal weight (18.5-25), overweight (25-30), and obese (≥ 30). Embryos' morphokinetic parameters were assessed with TLM and included time to syngamy, 2-cell, 3-cell, 4-cell, and 8-cell. A generalized linear mixed model was used to control for potential confounders and multiple embryos resulting from a single IVF cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 2150 embryos from 589 IVF cycles were reviewed and included in the analysis. Classification based on BMI was as follows: underweight (N = 56), normal weight (N = 1252), overweight (N = 502), and obese (N = 340). After adjusting for race and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the mean time to the 8-cell stage in the underweight group was 4.3 (95% CI: - 8.31, - 0.21) h less than in the normal weight group (P = 0.025) and 4.6 (95% CI: - 8.8, - 0.21) h less than in the obese group (p = 0.022). No significant difference was noted between race and TLM after controlling for possible confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Embryos from underweight women were demonstrated to have a faster time to the 8-cell stage than normal weight or obese women. No significant difference was noted for race. This study demonstrates that weight can be a factor contributing to embryo development as observed with TLM.

Change in the Strategy of Embryo Selection with Time-Lapse System Implementation-Impact on Clinical Pregnancy Rates

Time-lapse systems (TLS) and associated algorithms are interesting tools to improve embryo selection. This study aimed to evaluate how TLS and KIDScore™ algorithm changed our practices of embryo selection, as compared to a conventional morphological evaluation, and improved clinical pregnancy rates (CPR). In the study group (year 2020, n = 303 transfers), embryos were cultured in an EmbryoScope+ time-lapse incubator. A first team observed embryos conventionally once a day, while a second team selected the embryos for transfer based on time-lapse recordings. In the control group (year 2019, n = 279 transfers), embryos were selected using the conventional method, and CPR were recorded. In 2020, disagreement between TLS and the conventional method occurred in 32.1% of transfers, more often for early embryos (34.7%) than for blastocysts (20.5%). Irregular morphokinetic events (direct or reverse cleavage, multinucleation, abnormal pronuclei) were detected in 54.9% of the discordant embryos. When it was available, KIDScore™ was decreased for 73.2% of the deselected embryos. Discordant blastocysts mainly corresponded with a decrease in KIDScore™ (90.9%), whereas discordant Day 3 embryos resulted from a decreased KIDScore™ and/or an irregular morphokinetic event. CPR was significantly improved in the TLS group (2020), as compared to the conventional group (2019) (32.3% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.005), even after multivariate analysis. In conclusion, TLS is useful to highlight some embryo development abnormalities and identify embryos with the highest potential for pregnancy.

Neonatal Outcomes of Embryos Cultured in a Time-Lapse Incubation System: an Analysis of More Than 15,000 Fresh Transfer Cycles

In the past 5 years, the time-lapse culture system (TLS) has gradually been applied to the field of assisted reproduction. However, there are few reports on the comparison between this system and the conventional culture system (CS) on the outcome of newborns. As a new model in embryo culture, we should pay attention to its neonatal outcomes. We examined 15,252 fresh transfer cycles processed between January 2016 and December 2019. After propensity score matching, embryos in two groups, TLS and CS, had similar rates of miscarriages, ectopic pregnancy, and live delivery (P > 0.05). Embryos in the TLS group achieved higher clinical pregnancy and implantation rates (P < 0.05). Of the perinatal and neonatal outcomes, singletons and twins were analyzed separately. No significant differences were observed in gestational age, preterm deliveries, birth weight, and sex ratio (P > 0.05). Incidences of malformations of babies delivered from CS and TLS groups were also similar between the two groups. Embryos cultured in a TLS are as safe as CS with regard to neonatal outcomes, including congenital malformations.

Improving embryo selection by the development of a laboratory-adapted time-lapse model

OBJECTIVE

To study whether a powerful, in-house, embryo-selection model can be developed for a specific in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory where embryos were already selected for transfer using general models.

DESIGN

In total, 12,944 fertilized oocytes were incubated in an EmbryoScope (Vitrolife, Göteborg, Sweden) at our laboratory. Embryos were selected for transfer or freezing using general models. There were 1,879 embryos with known implantation data (KID), of which 425 had positive KIDs. For the outcome, we set 3 endpoints for KID's definition: gestational sac, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Results of a comparison between KID-positive and -negative embryos for cell division timings were analyzed separately for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and IVF embryos in patients aged 18-41 years.

SETTING

IVF center.

PATIENTS

The study included 1,075 women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment between June 2013 and February 2019.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The KID-positive and -negative embryos were analyzed for statistical differences in cell division timing and cell cycle intervals. We used the EmbryoScope Stats software (Unisense FertiliTech, Aarhus, Denmark) for model development. The statistically different timing parameters were tested for their contribution to scoring in the model. The algorithms were tested for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the KID embryos for developing day-2, -3, and -5 embryo-selection models. The validation of these algorithms was performed using calibration/validation procedures.

RESULTS

Because significant differences in morphokinetics were found between the KID-positive and KID-negative embryos in our laboratory, it was possible to use our specific KID data to develop an in-house model. The algorithms were developed for embryo selection on days 2, 3, and 5 in the ICSI embryos. In most cases, AUC was >0.65, which indicated that these models were valid in our laboratory. In addition, these AUC values were obtained from all gestational sac, clinical pregnancy, and live birth KID embryo databases tested. An increase in the predictability of the models was observed from days 2-3 to day 5 models. The AUC test results ranged between 0.657 and 0.673 for day 2 and day 3, respectively, and 0.803 for the day 5 model.

CONCLUSION

A model based on laboratory-specific morphokinetics was found to be complementary to general models and an important additive tool for improving single embryo selection. Developing an in-house laboratory-specific model requires many stages of sorting and characterization. Many insights were drawn about the model developing process. These may facilitate and improve the process in other laboratories.

Current Advancements in Noninvasive Profiling of the Embryo Culture Media Secretome

There have been over 8 million babies born through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and this number continues to grow. There is a global trend to perform elective single embryo transfers, avoiding risks associated with multiple pregnancies. It is therefore important to understand where current research of noninvasive testing for embryos stands, and what are the most promising techniques currently used. Furthermore, it is important to identify the potential to translate research and development into clinically applicable methods that ultimately improve live birth and reduce time to pregnancy. The current focus in the field of human reproductive medicine is to develop a more rapid, quantitative, and noninvasive test. Some of the most promising fields of research for noninvasive assays comprise cell-free DNA analysis, microscopy techniques coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) and omics analysis of the spent blastocyst media. High-throughput proteomics and metabolomics technologies are valuable tools for noninvasive embryo analysis. The biggest advantages of such technology are that it can differentiate between the embryos that appear morphologically identical and has the potential to identify the ploidy status noninvasively prior to transfer in a fresh cycle or before vitrification for a later frozen embryo transfer.

Developmental Potential of Abnormally Fertilized Oocytes and the Associated Clinical Outcomes

This study aims to investigate the embryo development potential of extending the culture of abnormally fertilized zygotes with no pronuclear (0PN), monopronuclear (1PN), and poor-quality day 3 embryos and to determine the associated clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective study performed between January 2014 and May 2018 at Jinhua People's Hospital. The normal developed embryos and the abnormal 0PN, 1PN, and poor-quality day 3 embryos were cultured to day 5 or 6 for embryo transfer. Clinical outcomes resulting from abnormal embryos and normally developed embryos were compared. A total of 6466 embryos (1542 0PN, 852 1PN, and 4072 poor-quality day 3 embryos) from 831 treatment cycles were cultured to the blastocyst stage. The total blastulation rate was 17.3% (1121/6466) with 18.2% in 0PN, 26.1% in 1PN, and 15.2% in poor-quality day 3 embryos. The rate for good-quality blastocyst formation was 9.5% (616/6466) with 11.2% in 0PN group, 14.8% in 1PN group, and 7.8% in poor-quality day 3 embryos, respectively. Blastulation rates of 0PN and 1PN derived from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were significantly lower compared with the in vitro fertilization group. A total of 243 cycles were transferred with blastocysts originating from abnormal embryos, resulting in 109 (44.9%) clinical pregnancies and 19 (17.4%) miscarriages; in the control group, a total of 350 cycles resulted in 214 (61.1%) clinical pregnancies and 18 (8.4%) miscarriages. The live birth rate was significantly lower in the abnormal embryo group than that in the control group. Collectively, conventional in vitro fertilization derived 0PN and 1PN zygotes, not ICSI, together with day 3 embryos with poor quality, that were able to reach the blastocyst stage and produce a fair pregnancy rate and live birth rate.

Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Embryo incubation and assessment is a vital step in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Traditionally, embryo assessment has been achieved by removing embryos from a conventional incubator daily for quality assessment by an embryologist, under a microscope. In recent years time-lapse systems (TLS) have been developed which can take digital images of embryos at frequent time intervals. This allows embryologists, with or without the assistance of embryo selection software, to assess the quality of the embryos without physically removing them from the incubator.The potential advantages of a TLS include the ability to maintain a stable culture environment, therefore limiting the exposure of embryos to changes in gas composition, temperature, and movement. A TLS has the potential advantage of improving embryo selection for ART treatment by utilising additional information gained through continuously monitoring embryo development. Use of a TLS often adds significant extra cost to ART treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of a TLS compared to conventional embryo incubation and assessment on clinical outcomes in couples undergoing ART.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard methodology recommended by Cochrane. We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and two trials registers on 7 January 2019 and checked references of appropriate papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TLS, with or without embryo selection software, versus conventional incubation with morphological assessment; and TLS with embryo selection software versus TLS without embryo selection software among couples undergoing ART.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage and stillbirth, and cumulative live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and cumulative clinical pregnancy. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE methodology. We made the following comparisons.TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images versus conventional incubation and assessmentTLS utilising embryo selection software versus TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images TLS utilising embryo selection software versus conventional incubation and assessment MAIN RESULTS: We included nine RCTs (N = 2955 infertile couples). The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low. The main limitations were high risk of bias in the included studies, imprecision, indirectness, and inconsistency. There were no data on cumulative live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate or cumulative clinical pregnancy rate.TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images versus conventional incubation and assessmentIt is unclear whether there is any difference between interventions in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.23, 3 RCTs, N = 826, I2 = 33%, low-quality evidence) or in miscarriage rates (OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.61, 3 RCTs, N = 826, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that if the rate of live birth or ongoing pregnancy associated with conventional incubation and assessment is 35%, the rate with the use of TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images would be between 27% and 40%, and if the miscarriage rate with conventional incubation is 4%, the rate associated with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images would be between 4% and 14%. It is unclear whether there is a difference between the interventions in rates of stillbirth (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 7.49, 1 RCT, N = 76, low-quality evidence) or clinical pregnancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.41, 4 RCTs, N = 875, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence).TLS utilising embryo selection software versus TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS imagesAll findings for this comparison were very uncertain due to the very low-quality of the evidence. No data were available on live birth, but one RCT reported ongoing pregnancy. It is unclear whether there is any difference between the interventions in rates of ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.20, 1 RCT, N = 163); miscarriage (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.01, 2 RCTs, N = 463, I2 = 0%); or clinical pregnancy (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42, 2 RCTs, N = 463, I2 = 0%). The evidence suggests that if the rate of ongoing pregnancy associated with TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images is 47%, the rate associated with TLS utilising embryo selection software would be between 22% and 52%, and if the miscarriage rate associated with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images is 5%, the rate associated with TLS utilising embryo selection software would be between 4% and 15%. No studies reported stillbirth.TLS utilising embryo selection software versus conventional incubation and assessmentThe findings for this comparison were also very uncertain due to the very low quality of the evidence. It is unclear whether there is any difference between the interventions in rates of live birth (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.36, 3 RCTs, N = 1617, I2 = 84%). There was very low-quality evidence that TLS might reduce miscarriage rates (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89, 3 RCTs, N = 1617, I2 = 0%). It is unclear whether there is any difference between the interventions in rates of clinical pregnancy (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16, 3 RCTs, N = 1617, I2 = 89%). The evidence suggests that if the rate of live birth associated with conventional incubation and assessment is 48%, the rate with TLS utilising embryo selection software would be between 46% and 55%, and if the miscarriage rate with conventional incubation and assessment is 11%, the rate associated with TLS would be between 5% and 10%. No stillbirths occurred in the only study reporting this outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient good-quality evidence of differences in live birth or ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage and stillbirth, or clinical pregnancy to choose between TLS, with or without embryo selection software, and conventional incubation. As the evidence is of low or very low-quality, our findings should be interpreted with caution.