Considering the type and timing of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Qualitative insights into women's decision-making

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on breast cancer patients with stage II-III disease who performed implant-based breast reconstruction following with PMRT between September 2016 and April 2022. The patients were categorized into two matched groups: (1) patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) or (2) subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) followed by PMRT. Following reconstruction, the patients were further compared for PMRT with the tissue expander (PMRT-TE) versus PMRT with permanent implant (PMRT-PI). PROs were measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Early and late complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 55 eligible patients were recruited. Patients who underwent PBR reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts scores (P = 0.003) compared with the SBR group. The PMRT-TE group had higher satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) but lower physical well-being (P = 0.029) scores compared with PMRT-PI group. Moreover, patients in SBR cohort had a higher risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) (20.5% vs 6.3%) and implant dislocation (48.7% vs 12.5%) than patients in PBR cohort. Patients in PMRT-PI group had a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) than PMRT-TE group (20.8% vs 12.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

PBR was associated with lower rates of late complications, especially for implant dislocation, and higher satisfaction with breasts scores compared to SBR. In addition, compared to PMRT-TE with PMRT-PI, patients in PMRT-TE cohort reported superior PROs of satisfaction with breasts.

Factors influencing the decision-making process in breast reconstruction from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons: A qualitative study involving Korean plastic surgeons

BACKGROUND

Little research has been conducted on factors influencing the decision-making process for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) options from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons, despite its significant impact on doctor-patient communication and shared decision-making. This study aims to explore the multiple factors and the mechanisms by which they interact using a qualitative methodology. We also address potential barriers to shared decision-making in IBR.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of reconstructive surgeons. Thematic analysis was used to identify key influences on IBR decision-making process from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons.

RESULTS

Four major themes were identified: 1. Patient clinical scenarios; 2. Nonclinical practice environments; 3. Reconstructive surgeon preferences; and 4. Patient consultation. Reconstructive surgeons demonstrated diverse approaches to patient clinical scenarios. High-volume centers were significantly influenced by nonclinical factors such as scheduling and operating room allocation systems. Reconstructive surgeons often had strong personal preferences for specific IBR options, shaped by their expertise, experience, and clinical environment. Based on the preliminary decision, surgeons provided information with varying degrees of neutrality. Patients varied in their knowledge and participation, resulting in variation in the final decision authority among surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need to address nonclinical environmental constraints to improve shared decision-making process in IBR. Surgeons should recognize power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship and be aware of their biases.

Information needs in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis of free-text responses from 2077 women

BACKGROUND

For many, breast reconstruction following mastectomy (BR) forms an integral part of breast cancer survivorship. For those considering BR, provision of information is essential to allow informed decisions. Using free-text responses from a survey of breast cancer survivors, this study aims to understand current gaps in information regarding BR.

METHOD

At the end of an online survey assessing BR experiences, participants were asked the open-ended question: "Thinking about women who may experience BR in the future, is there anything you think needs to change so that they have a better experience?". Responses were analysed to identify common themes.

RESULTS

3384 people completed the survey with 2,077 (61%) responding to the open-ended question. Three themes were identified: (1) content of information, (2) managing expectations, and (3) information sources, each associated with multiple subthemes. Information wanted in theme (1) covered a range of topics including BR options, risks, recovery and 'going flat.' Information on BR's psychological impact was also needed, with comments indicating many were not prepared for this. Theme (2) stressed the importance of realistic information about BR outcomes and processes to reduce discrepancies between expectations and experiences. In theme (3), peer insights and photos were important sources of realistic information.

CONCLUSION

Multiple gaps exist in BR-related information available to women. BR information needs to be comprehensive, realistic, and provided at the right time to allow informed decision-making. Developing strategies to strengthen existing information provision as well as new resources to fill information gaps might enhance BR experiences.

Current status and influencing factors of participating satisfaction during surgical treatment decision-making among breast cancer patients with immediate breast reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Breast reconstruction (BR) is a positive contribution to aesthetic effect among breast cancer patients. Identification of influenced factors for participating satisfaction may provide insights on the decision-making theory to promote patient's autonomy in surgical choice. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of participating satisfaction with surgical treatment decision-making and its predictors among breast cancer patients with immediate BR.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted including 163 breast cancer patients with immediate BR in Mainland China. Data was collected using patients' participation satisfaction in medical decision-making scale (PSMDS), Big five Short-Form (BFI) Scale, Patient Participation Competence Scale(PPCS) and Patients' Preference (MPP) scale. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Scores of PSMD were 86.38 ± 15.74. Multiple regression analyses indicated autonomous decision-making, marital statue, information acquisition competence, agreeableness, and decision-making preferences as indicators, explaining 29.6% of the response variation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The level of PSMD in breast cancer patients with immediate BR need to be improved. Patients with greater autonomous decision-making, married, higher information acquisition competence, agreeableness, and collaborative role are more likely to have an preferable PSMD. A comprehensive assessment and effective decision-making support are needed initially for BC patients to promote positive participation when making surgical decision.

Determinants of cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making based on the COM-B model: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making is affected by various factors, with the mechanisms not readily understood. This study explores the underlying mechanisms based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model and literature review.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted and 300 cancer patients conveniently recruited from three tertiary hospitals validly completed the self-administered questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to test the hypothesized model.

RESULTS

The findings generally supported the hypothesized model, which could explain 45% of the variance in cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making. Cancer patients' health literacy and perceived facilitation of involvement from health professionals had direct and indirect effects on their actual involvement, with the total effect β = 0.594, β = 0.223, P < 0.001, respectively. Patients' views of involvement in treatment decision-making had a direct effect on their actual involvement (β = 0.296, P < 0.001) and completely mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and their actual involvement (β = 0.040, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the COM-B model's explanatory potential in the context of cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making.

Effects of decision aids on breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the effects of decision aids for women facing breast reconstruction decision on decision conflict, decision regret, knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and depression.

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction decision is not good or bad and should be guided by clinical evidence and patient preferences. Decision aids can increase the patient's decision-making enthusiasm and ability, improve the quality of decision and promote shared decision-making between patients and medical staff.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eight databases were conducted from the establishment of the database until October 2021. The PRISMA checklist was selected for analysis in this paper. The meta-analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.3. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The result is decision conflict, decision regret, knowledge and other secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of twelve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that decision aids could significantly reduce decision conflict and decision regret, improve knowledge, satisfaction and depression and had no influence on anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the positive effect of decision aids on the decision-making of women facing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. In the future, more well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the effects of decision aids on the decision-making of breast reconstruction and nurses should be encouraged to take part in the development of decision aids in accordance with strict standards and apply them to breast cancer patients considering postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Our study provides evidence for the effectiveness of decision aids on breast reconstruction and points to the important role of healthcare providers in the use of decision aids and in facilitating shared decision-making.

Development and implementation of a decision aid for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction for Japanese women with breast cancer: a field-testing study

INTRODUCTION

Surgical options for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) have increased and become more diverse. These options may cause difficulty and stress for patients in making the best choice, and this also increases the likelihood of postoperative regret over a particular decision. To solve this issue, implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) using a decision aid (DA) has become of increasing interest. We have created the first prototype DA in Japan. The aim of the current field study was to assess the usability of this DA in promoting effective SDM and avoiding regret over a decision to undergo reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

A total of 25 consecutive patients who underwent BR were enrolled in the study, including 13 with SDM using the decision aid (DA + group) and 12 who received standard information (DA- group) before their choice of surgery. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) were completed after PMBR, whereas SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) was completed before PMBR. Descriptive and summary statistics were compared to identify differences between the two groups to assess the usability of the DA.

RESULTS

The DA + group had significantly higher mean total scores on the SDM-Q-9 (90.2 ± 5.3 vs. 84.1 ± 3.5, P = 0.0034) and DRS (90.3 ± 3.8 vs. 84.3 ± 6.7, P = 0.023), compared to those in the DA- group.

CONCLUSION

Use of the DA may cause patients to have a higher level of perceived SDM and less regret, which suggests that the DA helps to facilitate smooth and effective implementation of SDM. We conclude that this type of decision-making approach should be recommended for choice of surgery for PMBR.