1
|
Zhaksylyk A, Abdildin YG, Sultangazin S, Zhumakanova A, Viderman D. The impact of ketamine on pain-related outcomes after thoracotomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1394219. [PMID: 38919936 PMCID: PMC11196606 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This meta-analysis aims to examine how effective ketamine is in the management of acute and preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain by synthesizing the available research. Method A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library till May 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) examining the influence of ketamine on post-thoracotomy pain in adults were included. The intervention group included ketamine plus morphine, while the control group included morphine only. The outcome measures were opioid intake and pain scores at rest and on moving/coughing. Evidence quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE assessment. Results Nine articles comprising 556 patients were selected for meta-analysis. The intervention group had a significant decrease in pain at rest (Std. Mean Difference (SMD = -0.60 with 95% CI [-0.83, -0.37]) and on movement/cough (SMD = -0.73 [-1.27, -0.18]) in the first postoperative days. Also, the ketamine group had lower opioid consumption (mg) in comparison with controls (SMD = -2.75 [-4.14, -1.36], p-value = 0.0001) in postoperative days 1-3. There was no data to assess the long-term effect of ketamine on chronic pain. Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that ketamine use can lower acute pain levels and morphine use after thoracotomy. In the future, larger RCTs using standardized methods and assessing both short-term and long-term analgesic effects of ketamine are necessary to deepen the understanding of the issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruzhan Zhaksylyk
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Yerkin G. Abdildin
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Suienish Sultangazin
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Aigerim Zhumakanova
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Dmitriy Viderman
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, National Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abouarab AH, Brülle R, Aboukilila MY, Weibel S, Schnabel A. Efficacy and safety of perioperative ketamine for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: A meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2024; 24:553-566. [PMID: 37971167 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Assessment of the efficacy and safety of perioperative intravenous ketamine in reducing incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES The following data sources were systematically searched: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE (till 02/2021). PATIENTS Adult patients undergoing any surgery. INTERVENTIONS Perioperative use of intravenous ketamine as an additive analgesic drug compared to placebo, no active control treatment, and other additive drugs. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcomes were number of patients with chronic postsurgical pain after 6 months and ketamine related adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were chronic postsurgical pain incidence after 3 and 12 months, chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain incidence, chronic postsurgical moderate to severe pain incidence, intensity of chronic postsurgical pain at rest, and during movement, oral morphine consumption after 3, 6, and 12 months and incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-six RCTs were included with a total of 3572 patients. Ketamine compared to placebo may result in no difference in the number of patients with chronic postsurgical pain after 6 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.05; I2 = 34%; 16 studies; low-certainty evidence). Ketamine may reduce the incidence of chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain after 3 months in comparison to placebo (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, I2 = 31%, seven trials, low-certainty evidence). Ketamine compared to placebo may increase the risk for postoperative nystagmus (RR 9.04, 95% CI 1.15-70.90, I2 30%, two trials, low-certainty evidence) and postoperative visual disturbances (RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.05-4.99, I2 10%, seven trials, low-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS There is low-certainty evidence that perioperative ketamine has no effect on chronic postsurgical pain in adult patients. Low-certainty evidence suggests that ketamine compared to placebo may reduce incidence of chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain after 3 months. Questions like ideal dosing, treatment duration and more patient-related outcome measures remain unanswered, which warrants further studies. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION Prospero CRD42021223625, 07.01.2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed H Abouarab
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Rebecca Brülle
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | | | - Stephanie Weibel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Schnabel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clephas PRD, Hoeks SE, Singh PM, Guay CS, Trivella M, Klimek M, Heesen M. Prognostic factors for chronic post-surgical pain after lung and pleural surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia 2023. [PMID: 37094792 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Chronic post-surgical pain is known to be a common complication of thoracic surgery and has been associated with a lower quality of life, increased healthcare utilisation, substantial direct and indirect costs, and increased long-term use of opioids. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to identify and summarise the evidence of all prognostic factors for chronic post-surgical pain after lung and pleural surgery. Electronic databases were searched for retrospective and prospective observational studies as well as randomised controlled trials that included patients undergoing lung or pleural surgery and reported on prognostic factors for chronic post-surgical pain. We included 56 studies resulting in 45 identified prognostic factors, of which 16 were pooled with a meta-analysis. Prognostic factors that increased chronic post-surgical pain risk were as follows: higher postoperative pain intensity (day 1, 0-10 score), mean difference (95%CI) 1.29 (0.62-1.95), p < 0.001; pre-operative pain, odds ratio (95%CI) 2.86 (1.94-4.21), p < 0.001; and longer surgery duration (in minutes), mean difference (95%CI) 12.07 (4.99-19.16), p < 0.001. Prognostic factors that decreased chronic post-surgical pain risk were as follows: intercostal nerve block, odds ratio (95%CI) 0.76 (0.61-0.95) p = 0.018 and video-assisted thoracic surgery, 0.54 (0.43-0.66) p < 0.001. Trial sequential analysis was used to adjust for type 1 and type 2 errors of statistical analysis and confirmed adequate power for these prognostic factors. In contrast to other studies, we found that age had no significant effect on chronic post-surgical pain and there was not enough evidence to conclude on sex. Meta-regression did not reveal significant effects of any of the study covariates on the prognostic factors with a significant effect on chronic post-surgical pain. Expressed as grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations criteria, the certainty of evidence was high for pre-operative pain and video-assisted thoracic surgery, moderate for intercostal nerve block and surgery duration and low for postoperative pain intensity. We thus identified actionable factors which can be addressed to attempt to reduce the risk of chronic post-surgical pain after lung surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P R D Clephas
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S E Hoeks
- Department of Anaesthesia, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P M Singh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - C S Guay
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - M Trivella
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Klimek
- Department of Anaesthesia, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Heesen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Kantonsspital Baden AG, Baden, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Israel JE, St Pierre S, Ellis E, Hanukaai JS, Noor N, Varrassi G, Wells M, Kaye AD. Ketamine for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Comprehensive Review. Health Psychol Res 2021; 9:25535. [PMID: 34746491 DOI: 10.52965/001c.25535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain significantly worsens the quality of life. Unlike neuropathic, musculoskeletal, postoperative pain, and cancer pain, chronic primary pain cannot be explained by an underlying disease or condition, making its treatment arduous. Objectives This manuscript intends to provide a comprehensive review of the use of ketamine as a treatment option for specific chronic pain conditions. Study Design A review article. Setting A review of the literature. Methods A search was done on PubMed for relevant articles. Results A comprehensive review of the current understanding of chronic pain and the treatment of specific chronic pain conditions with ketamine. Limitations Literature is scarce regarding the use of ketamine for the treatment of chronic pain. Conclusion First-line treatment for many chronic pain conditions includes NSAIDs, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids. However, these treatment methods are unsuccessful in a subset of patients. Ketamine has been explored in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as an alternative treatment option, and it has been demonstrated to improve pain symptoms, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Conditions highlighted in this review include neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), phantom limb pain (PLP), cancer pain, and post-thoracotomy pain syndrome. This review will discuss conditions, such as neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, and more and ketamine's efficacy and its supplementary benefits in the chronic pain patient population. As the opioid crisis in the United States continues to persist, this review aims to understand better multimodal analgesia, which can improve how chronic pain is managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily Ellis
- Louisiana State University Health Shreveport
| | | | | | | | | | - Alan D Kaye
- Louisiana State University Health Shreveport
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lei Y, Liu H, Xia F, Gan S, Wang Y, Huo W, Wang Q, Ji F. Effects of Esketamine on Acute and Chronic Pain After Thoracoscopy Pulmonary Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Multicenter-Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:693594. [PMID: 34568362 PMCID: PMC8455819 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.693594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Post-operative pain management for patients undergoing thoracoscopy surgery is challenging for clinicians which increase both health and economic burden. The non-selective NMDA receptor antagonist esketamine possesses an analgesic effect twice that of ketamine. The application of esketamine might be beneficial in alleviating acute and chronic pain after thoracic surgery. The current study describes the protocol aiming to evaluate the analgesic effect of esketamine after pulmonary surgery via visual analog scale (VAS) score for acute and chronic pain. Methods: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study is designed to explore the analgesic effect of esketamine in randomized patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with general anesthesia. Patients will be randomly assigned to Esketamine Group (Group K) and Control Group (Group C) in a ratio of 1:1. Group K patients will receive esketamine with a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg after anesthesia induction, 0.1 mg/kg/h throughout the operation and 0.015 mg/kg/h in PCIA after surgery while Group C patients will receive the same volume of normal saline. The primary outcome is to measure the pain intensity through the VAS score at 3 months after the operation. The secondary outcome includes VAS score at 1, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h and on the 7th day and 1 month after the operation, complications, ketamine-related neurological side effects, recovery time of bowel function, and total amount of supplemental analgesics. Discussion: The results of the current study might illustrate the analgesic effect of esketamine for patients undergoing thoracoscopy pulmonary surgery and provide evidence and insight for perioperative pain management. Study Registration: The trial was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (CHICTR) on Nov 18th, 2020 (ChiCTR2000040012).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yishan Lei
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Huayue Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Fan Xia
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Shulin Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yulan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wenwen Huo
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Qinyun Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Fuhai Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mion G. Ketamine Analgesia: Not All Patients or Surgeries Seem to Be Equal. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:e114-e116. [PMID: 34032679 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Mion
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pharmacotherapy for the Prevention of Chronic Pain after Surgery in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:304-325. [PMID: 34237128 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic postsurgical pain can severely impair patient health and quality of life. This systematic review update evaluated the effectiveness of systemic drugs to prevent chronic postsurgical pain. METHODS The authors included double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials including adults that evaluated perioperative systemic drugs. Studies that evaluated same drug(s) administered similarly were pooled. The primary outcome was the proportion reporting any pain at 3 or more months postsurgery. RESULTS The authors identified 70 new studies and 40 from 2013. Most evaluated ketamine, pregabalin, gabapentin, IV lidocaine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids. Some meta-analyses showed statistically significant-but of unclear clinical relevance-reductions in chronic postsurgical pain prevalence after treatment with pregabalin, IV lidocaine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Meta-analyses with more than three studies and more than 500 participants showed no effect of ketamine on prevalence of any pain at 6 months when administered for 24 h or less (risk ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.07]; prevalence, 0 to 88% ketamine; 0 to 94% placebo) or more than 24 h (risk ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.74 to 1.12]; 6 to 71% ketamine; 5 to 78% placebo), no effect of pregabalin on prevalence of any pain at 3 months (risk ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.10]; 4 to 88% pregabalin; 3 to 80% placebo) or 6 months (risk ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.28]; 6 to 68% pregabalin; 4 to 69% placebo) when administered more than 24 h, and an effect of pregabalin on prevalence of moderate/severe pain at 3 months when administered more than 24 h (risk ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.68]; 0 to 20% pregabalin; 4 to 34% placebo). However, the results should be interpreted with caution given small study sizes, variable surgical types, dosages, timing and method of outcome measurements in relation to the acute pain trajectory in question, and preoperative pain status. CONCLUSIONS Despite agreement that chronic postsurgical pain is an important topic, extremely little progress has been made since 2013, likely due to study designs being insufficient to address the complexities of this multifactorial problem. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
|
8
|
Cabañero D, Maldonado R. Synergism between oral paracetamol and nefopam in a murine model of postoperative pain. Eur J Pain 2021; 25:1770-1787. [PMID: 33909343 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of paracetamol or nefopam for postoperative pain control is limited by the need of high doses associated with unwanted effects. Previous works suggest positive interactions between both compounds that may be exploited to obtain potentiation of antinociception. METHODS Mechanical and heat antinociception induced by oral doses of paracetamol, nefopam or their combination was studied by isobolographic analysis in a murine model of postsurgical pain. The effective doses that produced 50% antinociception (ED50 ) were calculated from the log dose-response curves for each compound. Subsequently, the effects of ED8.7 s, ED12.5 s, ED17.5 s and ED35 s of nefopam and paracetamol combined were assessed. RESULTS Oral paracetamol induced dose-dependent relief of postoperative sensitivity and showed higher efficacy reducing mechanical hypersensitivity (ED50 177.3 ± 15.4 mg/kg) than heat hyperalgesia (ED50 278.6 ± 43 mg/kg). Oral nefopam induced dose-dependent antinociception with similar efficacy for mechanical and heat hypersensitivity (ED50 s 5.42 ± 0.81 vs. 5.83 ± 0.72). Combinations of increasing isoeffective doses revealed that combined ED17.5 s (85.76 mg/kg paracetamol and 1.9 mg/kg nefopam) and ED35 s (132.67 mg/kg and 3.73 mg/kg) showed synergistic effects leading to 75% and 90% mechanical antinociception, respectively. These mixtures were defined by interaction indexes of 0.43 and 0.41 and ratios 45:1 and 35:1 paracetamol:nefopam, respectively. The same combinations showed additive effects for the inhibition of incisional thermal hyperalgesia. CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS This work describes a synergistic antinociceptive interaction between low doses of nefopam and paracetamol for the treatment of postoperative hypersensitivity to peripheral stimuli. The promising results obtained on reflexive nociceptive responses of young male mice subjected to plantar surgery highlight the interest of further research evaluating the effects of this mixture on the affective-motivational component of pain and in females and additional age groups. Confirmation of pain-relieving efficacy and safety of this oral combination clinically available in European and Asian countries could provide a useful tool for postsurgical pain management. SIGNIFICANCE Early postoperative pain is currently undertreated and has been recognized as a relevant source of chronic postsurgical pain. Oral efficient treatments could facilitate fast-track surgeries and patient recovery at home. Here, we identify in a mouse model of postoperative pain a potent synergistic oral combination consisting of low paracetamol and nefopam doses that provides relief of postsurgical hypersensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli. Oral multimodal paracetamol-nefopam mixtures represent a potential clinically available pharmacological strategy for the relief of incisional sensitivity and the promotion of patient recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cabañero
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Maldonado
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, postoperative opioid prescriptions have been implicated in the so-called 'opioid epidemic'. In Europe, the extent of overprescribing or misuse of opioids is not known. OBJECTIVES To describe the proportion of persistent postoperative opioid use in adults (>18 years) in European countries. DESIGN Systematic review of the published data. DATA SOURCES We searched the electronic literature databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies describing opioid use in adult patients (>18 years) at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS One thousand three hundred and seven studies were found, and 12 studies were included in this review. The rate of opioid use after 3 to 6 months was extracted from the studies and categorised by the type of surgery. Nine studies investigated opioid use after total hip or total knee arthroplasties (THA and TKA) and reported opioid user rates between 7.9 and 41% after 3 months. In all the included studies, a proportion between 2 and 41% of patients were opioid users 3 months after surgery. The level of evidence varied from high to very low. CONCLUSION To describe persistent opioid use in relation to specific countries or types of surgery is not possible. Because of the wide ranges observed, we can neither confirm nor rule out a possible public health problem linked to the persistent use of opioids in Europe. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42019154292.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taalke Sitter
- From the Epidemiology group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen (TS, PF) and Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF)
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kohtala S. Ketamine-50 years in use: from anesthesia to rapid antidepressant effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Pharmacol Rep 2021; 73:323-345. [PMID: 33609274 PMCID: PMC7994242 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-021-00232-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Over the past 50 years, ketamine has solidified its position in both human and veterinary medicine as an important anesthetic with many uses. More recently, ketamine has been studied and used for several new indications, ranging from chronic pain to drug addiction and post-traumatic stress disorder. The discovery of the rapid-acting antidepressant effects of ketamine has resulted in a surge of interest towards understanding the precise mechanisms driving its effects. Indeed, ketamine may have had the largest impact for advancements in the research and treatment of psychiatric disorders in the past few decades. While intense research efforts have been aimed towards uncovering the molecular targets underlying ketamine's effects in treating depression, the underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain elusive. These efforts are made more difficult by ketamine's complex dose-dependent effects on molecular mechanisms, multiple pharmacologically active metabolites, and a mechanism of action associated with the facilitation of synaptic plasticity. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the different uses of ketamine, with an emphasis on examining ketamine's rapid antidepressant effects spanning molecular, cellular, and network levels. Another focus of the review is to offer a perspective on studies related to the different doses of ketamine used in antidepressant research. Finally, the review discusses some of the latest hypotheses concerning ketamine's action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Kohtala
- Laboratory of Neurotherapeutics, Drug Research Program, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 56, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
- SleepWell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e895. [PMID: 33981929 PMCID: PMC8108588 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Although certain risk factors can identify individuals who are most likely to develop chronic pain, few interventions to prevent chronic pain have been identified. To facilitate the identification of preventive interventions, an IMMPACT meeting was convened to discuss research design considerations for clinical trials investigating the prevention of chronic pain. We present general design considerations for prevention trials in populations that are at relatively high risk for developing chronic pain. Specific design considerations included subject identification, timing and duration of treatment, outcomes, timing of assessment, and adjusting for risk factors in the analyses. We provide a detailed examination of 4 models of chronic pain prevention (ie, chronic postsurgical pain, postherpetic neuralgia, chronic low back pain, and painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy). The issues discussed can, in many instances, be extrapolated to other chronic pain conditions. These examples were selected because they are representative models of primary and secondary prevention, reflect persistent pain resulting from multiple insults (ie, surgery, viral infection, injury, and toxic or noxious element exposure), and are chronically painful conditions that are treated with a range of interventions. Improvements in the design of chronic pain prevention trials could improve assay sensitivity and thus accelerate the identification of efficacious interventions. Such interventions would have the potential to reduce the prevalence of chronic pain in the population. Additionally, standardization of outcomes in prevention clinical trials will facilitate meta-analyses and systematic reviews and improve detection of preventive strategies emerging from clinical trials.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kido K, Katagiri N, Kawana H, Sugino S, Konno D, Suzuki J, Yamauchi M, Sanuki T. Effects of magnesium sulfate administration in attenuating chronic postsurgical pain in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020; 534:395-400. [PMID: 33246558 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.11.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a serious issue for many postoperative patients. Though there are numerous treatment options for the prevention of CPSP, none of them is optimal as the mechanisms of the transition from acute to chronic postoperative pain have not been elucidated. Ketamine and opioids have been administered for chronic postoperative pain treatment but induce severe adverse reactions and/or physical dependency. Here, we examined whether pre-administration of the nonselective N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist magnesium sulfate attenuates CPSP behavior and alters the expression of glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1a (Grin1 mRNA) in a rat skin/muscle incision and retraction (SMIR) model. We assessed the effects of a single subcutaneous magnesium sulfate injection on nociceptive behaviors including guarding pain, mechanical hyperalgesia, and heat hypersensitivity in rats after SMIR surgery. We used reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to evaluate Grin1 mRNA expression in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord on postoperative day 14. Compared with the vehicle, magnesium sulfate administration before SMIR surgery reduced mechanical hyperalgesia for 17 d Grin1 gene expression was significantly higher on the ipsilateral side than the contralateral side (P = 0.001) on postoperative day 14. The magnesium sulfate injection prevented Grin1 mRNA upregulation in the spinal cord dorsal horn. A single magnesium sulfate injection mitigated SMIR-induced mechanical hyperalgesia possibly by modulating Grin1 expression. Preoperative magnesium sulfate administration could prove to be a simple and safe CPSP treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanta Kido
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kanagawa Dental University Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Norika Katagiri
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kanagawa Dental University Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiromasa Kawana
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Kanagawa Dental University Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigekazu Sugino
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Daisuke Konno
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Jun Suzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Masanori Yamauchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Takuro Sanuki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kanagawa Dental University Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cuménal M, Selvy M, Kerckhove N, Bertin C, Morez M, Courteix C, Busserolles J, Balayssac D. The Safety of Medications used to Treat Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, Part 2 (Opioids, Cannabinoids and Other Drugs): review of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trials. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 20:51-68. [PMID: 33103931 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1842871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peripheral neuropathic pain is a disabling condition for patients and a challenge for physicians. Although many drugs have been assessed in scientific studies, few have demonstrated clear clinical efficacy against neuropathic pain. Moreover, the paucity of data regarding their safety raises the question of the benefit-risk ratio when used in patients experiencing peripheral neuropathies. AREAS COVERED We conducted a review of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials to assess the safety of medications used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. This second review was focused on opioids, cannabinoids, and other medications. The aim was to provide an overview of the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (≥10%) and the serious adverse effects described in clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION Opioids and cannabinoids had significantly more TEAEs than placebos. Locally administered analgesics, such as capsaicin, lidocaine, botulinum toxin A seemed to have the most acceptable safety with only local adverse effects. The results for NMDA antagonists were inconclusive since no safety report was available. Less than half of the studies included presented a good description of TEAEs that included a statistical comparison versus a placebo group. Major methodological improvements must be made to ameliorate the assessment of medication safety in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélissa Cuménal
- Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Selvy
- Université Clermont Auvergne,CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Kerckhove
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INSERM U1107 NEURO-DOL, Institut Analgesia , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Célian Bertin
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INSERM U1107 NEURO-DOL, Institut Analgesia , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Margaux Morez
- Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Christine Courteix
- Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jérôme Busserolles
- Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - David Balayssac
- Université Clermont Auvergne,CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL , Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Treating acute pain after thoracotomy surgery and preventing the development of chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) remain significant challenges in this surgical population. While appropriately treated acute thoracotomy pain often resolves, a significant number of patients develop PTPS, with up to 65% of patients experiencing some pain and 10% suffering life-altering, debilitating pain. Currently, there is very little known about specific molecular targets or novel therapeutic combinations that effectively prevent PTPS. Identifying modifiable clinical risk factors (procedure, physical and mental health, preoperative pain in the surgical area and another regions) seems to the most pragmatic approach for prevention for now. Effective acute pain management adopting a multimodal approach can result in a decreased incidence of PTPS. Interventional techniques such as paraverterbral blocks, intercostal blocks, and erector spinae blocks show some promise as well. Future research should be focused on minimally invasive surgeries and also the effect of ERAS protocols, including early mobilization, nutrition, and early removal of drains, on the development of PTPS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gebhardt BR, Jain A, Basaham SA, Zahedi F, Ianchulev S, Brinckerhoff LH, Augoustides JG, Patel PA, Tsai A, Cobey FC. Chronic postthoracotomy pain in transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Card Anaesth 2020; 22:239-245. [PMID: 31274483 PMCID: PMC6639875 DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_77_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Chronic postthoracotomy pain (CPTP) is a persistent, occasionally debilitating pain lasting >2 months following thoracic surgery. This study investigates for the first time the prevalence and clinical impact of CPTP in patients who have undergone a transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR). Design: This was a single-institution, prospective observational survey and a retrospective chart review. Setting: The study was conducted in the University Hospital. Participants: Patients. Materials and Methods: A survey of 131 participants with either a previous TA TAVR or transfemoral (TF) TAVR procedure was completed. A telephone interview was conducted at least 2 months following TAVR; participants were asked to describe their pain using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Measurements and Main Results: Odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the proportions of questionnaire responders reporting “sensory” descriptors in the TA-TAVR versus the TF-TAVR groups. Results were then compared to individual Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ12) scores and 5-min walk test (5MWT) distances. A total of 119 participants were reviewed (63 TF, 56 TA). Among TA-TAVR questionnaire responders (n = 16), CPTP was found in 64.3% of participants for an average duration of 20.5-month postprocedure (OR = 10, [confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.91–52.5]; P = 0.003). TA-TAVR patients identified with CPTP had significant reductions in 5MWT distances (−2.22 m vs. 0.92 m [P = 0.04]) as well as trend toward significance in negative change of KCCQ12 scores OR = 18.82 (CI 95% 0.85–414.99; P = 0.06) compared to those without CPTP. Conclusions: CPTP occurs in patients undergoing TA-TAVR and is possibly associated with a decline quality of life and overall function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Gebhardt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ankit Jain
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah A Basaham
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Farhad Zahedi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefan Ianchulev
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - John G Augoustides
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Section Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Prakash A Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Tsai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borys M, Hanych A, Czuczwar M. Paravertebral Block Versus Preemptive Ketamine Effect on Pain Intensity after Posterolateral Thoracotomies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030793. [PMID: 32183267 PMCID: PMC7141329 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe postoperative pain affects most patients after thoracotomy and is a risk factor for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS). This randomized controlled trial compared preemptively administered ketamine versus continuous paravertebral block (PVB) versus control in patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy. The primary outcome was acute pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, patient satisfaction, and PTPS assessment with Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Inventory (NPSI). Acute pain intensity was significantly lower with PVB compared to other groups at four out of six time points. Patients in the PVB group used significantly less morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump than participants in other groups. Moreover, patients were more satisfied with postoperative pain management after PVB. PVB, but not ketamine, decreased PTPS intensity at 1, 3, and 6 months after posterolateral thoracotomy. Acute pain intensity at hour 8 and PTPS intensity at month 3 correlated positively with PTPS at month 6. Bodyweight was negatively associated with chronic pain at month 6. Thus, PVB but not preemptively administered ketamine decreases both acute and chronic pain intensity following posterolateral thoracotomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Borys
- Second Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-81-5322713; Fax: +48-81-5322712
| | - Agata Hanych
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Therapy, Podkarpackie Center of Lung Disease, 35-241 Rzeszów, Poland;
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Therapy and Pain Treatment, 39-120 Sędziszów Małopolski, Poland
| | - Mirosław Czuczwar
- Second Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cameron M, Tam K, Al Wahaibi K, Charghi R, Béïque F. Intraoperative Ketamine for Analgesia Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:586-591. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
18
|
Maranhao B, Gregory SH. What Is the Role of Ketamine in Postoperative Pain Management? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 34:592-593. [PMID: 31831319 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Maranhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis,St. Louis, MO
| | - Stephen H Gregory
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis,St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Czarnetzki C, Desmeules J, Tessitore E, Faundez A, Chabert J, Daali Y, Fournier R, Dupuis‐Lozeron E, Cedraschi C, Richard Tramèr M. Perioperative intravenous low‐dose ketamine for neuropathic pain after major lower back surgery: A randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Eur J Pain 2019; 24:555-567. [DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Czarnetzki
- Division of Anaesthesiology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
| | - Jules Desmeules
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Enrico Tessitore
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
- Division of Neurosurgery Department of Neurosciences Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Antonio Faundez
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Department of Surgery Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Jocelyne Chabert
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Youssef Daali
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Roxane Fournier
- Division of Anaesthesiology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
| | - Elise Dupuis‐Lozeron
- Clinical Research Centre & Division of Clinical Epidemiology Department of Health and Community Medicine University of Geneva & Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Christine Cedraschi
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Martin Richard Tramèr
- Division of Anaesthesiology Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the context of the current opioid epidemic, there has been a renewed interest in the use of ketamine as an analgesic agent. METHODS We reviewed ketamine analgesia. RESULTS Ketamine is well-known as an antagonist for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. In addition, it can regulate the function of opioid receptors and sodium channels. Ketamine also increases signaling through α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors. These myriad of molecular and cellular mechanisms are responsible for a number of pharmacological functions including pain relief and mood regulation. Clinically, a number of studies have investigated the role of ketamine in the setting of acute and chronic pain, and there is evidence that ketamine can provide analgesia in a variety of pain syndromes. DISCUSSION In this review, we examined basic mechanisms of ketamine and its current clinical use and potential novel use in pain management.
Collapse
|
21
|
Martin E, Sorel M, Morel V, Marcaillou F, Picard P, Delage N, Tiberghien F, Crosmary MC, Najjar M, Colamarino R, Créach C, Lietar B, Brumauld de Montgazon G, Margot-Duclot A, Loriot MA, Narjoz C, Lambert C, Pereira B, Pickering G. Dextromethorphan and memantine after ketamine analgesia: a randomized control trial. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2019; 13:2677-2688. [PMID: 31447547 PMCID: PMC6683947 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s207350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Intravenous ketamine is often prescribed in severe neuropathic pain. Oral N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists might prolong pain relief, reducing the frequency of ketamine infusions and hospital admissions. This clinical trial aimed at assessing whether oral dextromethorphan or memantine might prolong pain relief after intravenous ketamine. Patients and methods A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial included 60 patients after ketamine infusion for refractory neuropathic pain. Dextromethorphan (90 mg/day), memantine (20 mg/day) or placebo was given for 12 weeks (n=20 each) after ketamine infusion. The primary endpoint was pain intensity at one month. Secondary endpoints included pain, sleep, anxiety, depression, cognitive function and quality of life evaluations up to 12 weeks. Results At 1 month, dextromethorphan maintained ketamine pain relief (Numeric Pain Scale: 4.01±1.87 to 4.05±2.61, p=0.53) and diminished pain paroxysms (p=0.03) while pain intensity increased significantly with memantine and placebo (p=0.04). At 3 months, pain remained lower than at inclusion (p=0.001) and was not significantly different in the three groups. Significant benefits were observed on cognitive-affective domains and quality of life for dextromethorphan and memantine (p<0.05). Conclusions Oral dextromethorphan given after ketamine infusion extends pain relief during one month and could help patients to better cope with pain. Future studies should include larger populations stratified on pharmacogenetics screening. Optimization of an oral drug that could extend ketamine antihyperalgesia, with fewer hospital admissions, remains a prime challenge in refractory neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elodie Martin
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Pharmacologie Fondamentale Et Clinique de la Douleur, Neuro-Dol, Inserm 1107, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marc Sorel
- Centre D'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur/soins Palliatifs, Nemours, France
| | - Véronique Morel
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique/Centre d'investigation Clinique Inserm 1405, F-63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex, France
| | - Fabienne Marcaillou
- Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Pascale Picard
- Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Noémie Delage
- Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Florence Tiberghien
- Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur/soins Palliatifs, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | | | - Mitra Najjar
- Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CH Jacques Lacarin Vichy, France
| | - Renato Colamarino
- Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CH Jacques Lacarin Vichy, France
| | - Christelle Créach
- Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU de Saint-etienne, France.,Inserm U1028 & Umr 5292, Centre de Neurosciences de Lyon, Université Lyon & Jean-monnet De Saint-etienne, France
| | - Béatrice Lietar
- Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU de Saint-etienne, France
| | | | - Anne Margot-Duclot
- Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, Fondation A de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Anne Loriot
- Service de biochimie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Inserm UMR-S 1147, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Céline Narjoz
- Service de biochimie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Inserm UMR-S 1147, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Céline Lambert
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation - Villa annexe IFSI, 58 Rue Montalembert, F-63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation - Villa annexe IFSI, 58 Rue Montalembert, F-63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex, France
| | - Gisèle Pickering
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Pharmacologie Fondamentale Et Clinique de la Douleur, Neuro-Dol, Inserm 1107, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.,CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique/Centre d'investigation Clinique Inserm 1405, F-63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nowacka A, Borczyk M. Ketamine applications beyond anesthesia - A literature review. Eur J Pharmacol 2019; 860:172547. [PMID: 31348905 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ketamine's clinical use began in the 1970s. Physicians benefited from its safety and ability to induce short-term anesthesia and analgesia. The psychodysleptic effects caused by the drug called its further clinical use into question. Despite these unpleasant effects, ketamine is still applied in veterinary medicine, field medicine, and specialist anesthesia. Recent intensive research brought into light new possible applications of this drug. It began to be used in acute, chronic and cancer pain management. Most interesting reports come from research on the antidepressive and antisuicidal properties of ketamine giving hope for the creation of an effective treatment for major depressive disorder. Other reports highlight the possible use of ketamine in treating addiction, asthma and preventing cancer growth. Besides clinical use, the drug is also applied to in animal model of schizophrenia. It seems that nowadays, with numerous possible applications, the use of ketamine has returned; to its former glory. Nevertheless, the drug must be used with caution because still the mechanisms by which it executes its functions and long-term effects of its use are not fully known. This review aims to discuss the well-known and new promising applications of ketamine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata Nowacka
- Laboratory of Molecular Basis of Behavior, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Malgorzata Borczyk
- Laboratory of Molecular Basis of Behavior, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wong J, Cooper J, Thomas R, Langford R, Anwar S. Persistent Postsurgical Pain Following Thoracotomy: A Comparison of Thoracic Epidural and Paravertebral Blockade as Preventive Analgesia. PAIN MEDICINE 2019; 20:1796-1802. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) is common following thoracotomy. Thoracic epidural (TEB) and paravertebral blockade (PVB) are both established forms of perioperative analgesia for thoracotomy. There is currently a lack of data on their influence on PPP; this study aims to evaluate both techniques on PPP.
Design
Observational study, prospectively collected data.
Methods
Adults who underwent thoracotomy had either TEB or PVB for analgesia and were prospectively interviewed at six months. A numerical rating scale, the short form of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, and the EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) index were used to assess pain, neuropathic pain, and quality of life.
Results
Eighty-two patients who underwent a thoracotomy were recruited (TEB N = 36, PVB N = 46). Pain scores had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 1 (0 to 4.5) and 1.5 (0 to 4, P = 0.89), presence of PPP was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 40.0–74.5%) and 60.9% (95% CI = 45.4–74.9%, P = 0.81), and presence of neuropathic pain was 30.6% (95% CI = 16.3–48.1%) and 28.2% (95% CI = 16.0–43.5%, P = 0.85). Reported quality of life was 0.71 (0.14–0.85) and 0.80 (0.19–0.91, P = 0.21). Patients who had PPP reported worse quality of life measures compared with those who were pain free, with a median (IQR) EQ-5D index of 0.69 (–0.15 to 0.85) and 0.85 (0.72 to 1, P = 0.0007); quality of life was worst when there was a neuropathic component (median = 0.39, IQR = –0.24 to 0.75).
Conclusions
There was no statistical difference in the development of persistent postsurgical pain between patients who received a TEB or a PVB; however, patients who developed PPP had a significantly lower quality of life, which was worse with a neuropathic component.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon Wong
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre and St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jackie Cooper
- William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rik Thomas
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard Langford
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre and St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sibtain Anwar
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre and St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chumbley GM, Thompson L, Swatman JE, Urch C. Ketamine infusion for 96 hr after thoracotomy: Effects on acute and persistent pain. Eur J Pain 2019; 23:985-993. [DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
25
|
Brinck EC, Tiippana E, Heesen M, Bell RF, Straube S, Moore RA, Kontinen V. Perioperative intravenous ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 12:CD012033. [PMID: 30570761 PMCID: PMC6360925 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012033.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequate pain management after surgery increases the risk of postoperative complications and may predispose for chronic postsurgical pain. Perioperative ketamine may enhance conventional analgesics in the acute postoperative setting. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative intravenous ketamine in adult patients when used for the treatment or prevention of acute pain following general anaesthesia. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase to July 2018 and three trials registers (metaRegister of controlled trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)) together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We sought randomised, double-blind, controlled trials of adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia and being treated with perioperative intravenous ketamine. Studies compared ketamine with placebo, or compared ketamine plus a basic analgesic, such as morphine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), with a basic analgesic alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors searched for studies, extracted efficacy and adverse event data, examined issues of study quality and potential bias, and performed analyses. Primary outcomes were opioid consumption and pain intensity at rest and during movement at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were time to first analgesic request, assessment of postoperative hyperalgesia, central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN RESULTS We included 130 studies with 8341 participants. Ketamine was given to 4588 participants and 3753 participants served as controls. Types of surgery included ear, nose or throat surgery, wisdom tooth extraction, thoracotomy, lumbar fusion surgery, microdiscectomy, hip joint replacement surgery, knee joint replacement surgery, anterior cruciate ligament repair, knee arthroscopy, mastectomy, haemorrhoidectomy, abdominal surgery, radical prostatectomy, thyroid surgery, elective caesarean section, and laparoscopic surgery. Racemic ketamine bolus doses were predominantly 0.25 mg to 1 mg, and infusions 2 to 5 µg/kg/minute; 10 studies used only S-ketamine and one only R-ketamine. Risk of bias was generally low or uncertain, except for study size; most had fewer than 50 participants per treatment arm, resulting in high heterogeneity, as expected, for most analyses. We did not stratify the main analysis by type of surgery or any other factor, such as dose or timing of ketamine administration, and used a non-stratified analysis.Perioperative intravenous ketamine reduced postoperative opioid consumption over 24 hours by 8 mg morphine equivalents (95% CI 6 to 9; 19% from 42 mg consumed by participants given placebo, moderate-quality evidence; 65 studies, 4004 participants). Over 48 hours, opioid consumption was 13 mg lower (95% CI 10 to 15; 19% from 67 mg with placebo, moderate-quality evidence; 37 studies, 2449 participants).Perioperative intravenous ketamine reduced pain at rest at 24 hours by 5/100 mm on a visual analogue scale (95% CI 4 to 7; 19% lower from 26/100 mm with placebo, high-quality evidence; 82 studies, 5004 participants), and at 48 hours by 5/100 mm (95% CI 3 to 7; 22% lower from 23/100 mm, high-quality evidence; 49 studies, 2962 participants). Pain during movement was reduced at 24 hours (6/100 mm, 14% lower from 42/100 mm, moderate-quality evidence; 29 studies, 1806 participants), and 48 hours (6/100 mm, 16% lower from 37 mm, low-quality evidence; 23 studies, 1353 participants).Results for primary outcomes were consistent when analysed by pain at rest or on movement, operation type, and timing of administration, or sensitivity to study size and pain intensity. No analysis by dose was possible. There was no difference when nitrous oxide was used. We downgraded the quality of the evidence once if numbers of participants were large but small-study effects were present, or twice if numbers were small and small-study effects likely but testing not possible.Ketamine increased the time for the first postoperative analgesic request by 54 minutes (95% CI 37 to 71 minutes), from a mean of 39 minutes with placebo (moderate-quality evidence; 31 studies, 1678 participants). Ketamine reduced the area of postoperative hyperalgesia by 7 cm² (95% CI -11.9 to -2.2), compared with placebo (very low-quality evidence; 7 studies 333 participants). We downgraded the quality of evidence because of small-study effects or because the number of participants was below 400.CNS adverse events occurred in 52 studies, while 53 studies reported of absence of CNS adverse events. Overall, 187/3614 (5%) participants receiving ketamine and 122/2924 (4%) receiving control treatment experienced an adverse event (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.4; high-quality evidence; 105 studies, 6538 participants). Ketamine reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting from 27% with placebo to 23% with ketamine (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96; the number needed to treat to prevent one episode of postoperative nausea and vomiting with perioperative intravenous ketamine administration was 24 (95% CI 16 to 54; high-quality evidence; 95 studies, 5965 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Perioperative intravenous ketamine probably reduces postoperative analgesic consumption and pain intensity. Results were consistent in different operation types or timing of ketamine administration, with larger and smaller studies, and by higher and lower pain intensity. CNS adverse events were little different with ketamine or control. Perioperative intravenous ketamine probably reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting by a small extent, of arguable clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina Cv Brinck
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Töölö Hospital, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki, Finland, PB 266 00029
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Abstract
The development of chronic pain is considered a major complication after surgery. Basic science research in animal models helps us understand the transition from acute to chronic pain by identifying the numerous molecular and cellular changes that occur in the peripheral and central nervous systems. It is now well recognized that inflammation and nerve injury lead to long-term synaptic plasticity that amplifies and also maintains pain signaling, a phenomenon referred to as pain sensitization. In the context of surgery in humans, pain sensitization is both responsible for an increase in postoperative pain via the expression of wound hyperalgesia and considered a critical factor for the development of persistent postsurgical pain. Using specific drugs that block the processes of pain sensitization reduces postoperative pain and prevents the development of persistent postoperative pain. This narrative review of the literature describes clinical investigations evaluating different preventative pharmacologic strategies that are routinely used by anesthesiologists in their daily clinical practices for preventing persistent postoperative pain. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed in both basic and clinical science research to identify preclinical models and novel therapeutics targets. There remains a need for more patient numbers in clinical research, for more reliable data, and for the development of the safest and the most effective strategies to limit the incidence of persistent postoperative pain.
Collapse
|
27
|
The efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for preventing chronic post-surgical pain: a network meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 9:32081-32095. [PMID: 30174798 PMCID: PMC6112831 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to conflicting evidence regarding first-line therapies for chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP), here we comparatively evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for the prevention of CPSP. Materials and Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic drugs measuring pain three months or more post-surgery. Pairwise meta-analyses (a frequentist technique directly comparing each intervention against placebo) and network meta-analyses (a Bayesian technique simultaneously comparing several interventions via an evidence network) compared the mean differences for primary efficacy (reduction in all pain), secondary efficacy (reduction in moderate or severe pain), and primary safety (drop-out rate from treatment-related adverse effects). Ranking probabilities from the network meta-analysis were transformed using surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA). Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of age, gender, surgery type, and outlier studies. Results Twenty-four RCTs were included. Mexiletine and ketamine ranked highest in primary efficacy, while ketamine and nefopam ranked highest in secondary efficacy. Simultaneous SUCRA-based rankings of the interventions according to both efficacy and safety revealed that nefopam and mexiletine ranked highest in preventing CPSP. Through the sensitivity analyses, gabapentin and ketamine remained the most-highly-ranked in terms of efficacy, while nefopam and ketamine remained the most-highly-ranked in terms of safety. Conclusions Nefopam and mexiletine may be considered as first-line therapies for the prevention of CPSP. On account of the paucity of evidence available on nefopam and mexiletine, gabapentin and ketamine may also be considered. Venlafaxine is not recommended for the prevention of CPSP.
Collapse
|
28
|
Weinstein EJ, Levene JL, Cohen MS, Andreae DA, Chao JY, Johnson M, Hall CB, Andreae MH. Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 6:CD007105. [PMID: 29926477 PMCID: PMC6377212 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007105.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional anaesthesia may reduce the rate of persistent postoperative pain (PPP), a frequent and debilitating condition. This review was originally published in 2012 and updated in 2017. OBJECTIVES To compare local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for the prevention of PPP beyond three months in adults and children undergoing elective surgery. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase to December 2016 without any language restriction. We used a combination of free text search and controlled vocabulary search. We limited results to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We updated this search in December 2017, but these results have not yet been incorporated in the review. We conducted a handsearch in reference lists of included studies, review articles and conference abstracts. We searched the PROSPERO systematic review registry for related systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing local or regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia with a pain outcome beyond three months after elective, non-orthopaedic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data and adverse events. We contacted study authors for additional information. We presented outcomes as pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), based on random-effects models (inverse variance method). We analysed studies separately by surgical intervention, but pooled outcomes reported at different follow-up intervals. We compared our results to Bayesian and classical (frequentist) models. We investigated heterogeneity. We assessed the quality of evidence with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS In this updated review, we identified 40 new RCTs and seven ongoing studies. In total, we included 63 RCTs in the review, but we were only able to synthesize data on regional anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP beyond three months after surgery from 39 studies, enrolling a total of 3027 participants in our inclusive analysis.Evidence synthesis of seven RCTs favoured epidural anaesthesia for thoracotomy, suggesting the odds of having PPP three to 18 months following an epidural for thoracotomy were 0.52 compared to not having an epidural (OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.84, 499 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Simlarly, evidence synthesis of 18 RCTs favoured regional anaesthesia for the prevention of persistent pain three to 12 months after breast cancer surgery with an OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.68, 1297 participants, low-quality evidence). Pooling data at three to 8 months after surgery from four RCTs favoured regional anaesthesia after caesarean section with an OR of 0.46, (95% CI 0.28 to 0.78; 551 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Evidence synthesis of three RCTs investigating continuous infusion with local anaesthetic for the prevention of PPP three to 55 months after iliac crest bone graft harvesting (ICBG) was inconclusive (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.09; 123 participants, low-quality evidence). However, evidence synthesis of two RCTs also favoured the infusion of intravenous local anaesthetics for the prevention of PPP three to six months after breast cancer surgery with an OR of 0.24 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.69, 97 participants, moderate-quality evidence).We did not synthesize evidence for the surgical subgroups of limb amputation, hernia repair, cardiac surgery and laparotomy. We could not pool evidence for adverse effects because the included studies did not examine them systematically, and reported them sparsely. Clinical heterogeneity, attrition and sparse outcome data hampered evidence synthesis. High risk of bias from missing data and lack of blinding across a number of included studies reduced our confidence in the findings. Thus results must be interpreted with caution. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We conclude that there is moderate-quality evidence that regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of developing PPP after three to 18 months after thoracotomy and three to 12 months after caesarean section. There is low-quality evidence that regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of developing PPP three to 12 months after breast cancer surgery. There is moderate evidence that intravenous infusion of local anaesthetics may reduce the risk of developing PPP three to six months after breast cancer surgery.Our conclusions are considerably weakened by the small size and number of studies, by performance bias, null bias, attrition and missing data. Larger, high-quality studies, including children, are needed. We caution that except for breast surgery, our evidence synthesis is based on only a few small studies. On a cautionary note, we cannot extend our conclusions to other surgical interventions or regional anaesthesia techniques, for example we cannot conclude that paravertebral block reduces the risk of PPP after thoracotomy. There are seven ongoing studies and 12 studies awaiting classification that may change the conclusions of the current review once they are published and incorporated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica J Weinstein
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University1300 Morris Park AveBronxNYUSA10461
| | - Jacob L Levene
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University1300 Morris Park AveBronxNYUSA10461
| | - Marc S Cohen
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology111 E 210 StreetBronxNYUSA#N4‐005
| | - Doerthe A Andreae
- Milton S Hershey Medical CenterDepartment of Allergy/ Immunology500 University DrHersheyPAUSA17033
| | - Jerry Y Chao
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology111 E 210 StreetBronxNYUSA#N4‐005
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Teachers College, Columbia UniversityHuman DevelopmentNew YorkNYUSA10027
| | - Charles B Hall
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health1300 Morris Park AvenueBronxNYUSA10461
| | - Michael H Andreae
- Milton S Hershey Medical CentreDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine500 University DriveH187HersheyPAUSA17033
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Weinstein EJ, Levene JL, Cohen MS, Andreae DA, Chao JY, Johnson M, Hall CB, Andreae MH. Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4:CD007105. [PMID: 29694674 PMCID: PMC6080861 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007105.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional anaesthesia may reduce the rate of persistent postoperative pain (PPP), a frequent and debilitating condition. This review was originally published in 2012 and updated in 2017. OBJECTIVES To compare local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for the prevention of PPP beyond three months in adults and children undergoing elective surgery. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase to December 2016 without any language restriction. We used a combination of free text search and controlled vocabulary search. We limited results to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We updated this search in December 2017, but these results have not yet been incorporated in the review. We conducted a handsearch in reference lists of included studies, review articles and conference abstracts. We searched the PROSPERO systematic review registry for related systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing local or regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia with a pain outcome beyond three months after elective, non-orthopaedic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data and adverse events. We contacted study authors for additional information. We presented outcomes as pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), based on random-effects models (inverse variance method). We analysed studies separately by surgical intervention, but pooled outcomes reported at different follow-up intervals. We compared our results to Bayesian and classical (frequentist) models. We investigated heterogeneity. We assessed the quality of evidence with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS In this updated review, we identified 40 new RCTs and seven ongoing studies. In total, we included 63 RCTs in the review, but we were only able to synthesize data on regional anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP beyond three months after surgery from 41 studies, enrolling a total of 3143 participants in our inclusive analysis.Evidence synthesis of seven RCTs favoured epidural anaesthesia for thoracotomy, suggesting the odds of having PPP three to 18 months following an epidural for thoracotomy were 0.52 compared to not having an epidural (OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.84, 499 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Simlarly, evidence synthesis of 18 RCTs favoured regional anaesthesia for the prevention of persistent pain three to 12 months after breast cancer surgery with an OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.68, 1297 participants, low-quality evidence). Pooling data at three to 8 months after surgery from four RCTs favoured regional anaesthesia after caesarean section with an OR of 0.46, (95% CI 0.28 to 0.78; 551 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Evidence synthesis of three RCTs investigating continuous infusion with local anaesthetic for the prevention of PPP three to 55 months after iliac crest bone graft harvesting (ICBG) was inconclusive (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.09; 123 participants, low-quality evidence). However, evidence synthesis of two RCTs also favoured the infusion of intravenous local anaesthetics for the prevention of PPP three to six months after breast cancer surgery with an OR of 0.24 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.69, 97 participants, moderate-quality evidence).We did not synthesize evidence for the surgical subgroups of limb amputation, hernia repair, cardiac surgery and laparotomy. We could not pool evidence for adverse effects because the included studies did not examine them systematically, and reported them sparsely. Clinical heterogeneity, attrition and sparse outcome data hampered evidence synthesis. High risk of bias from missing data and lack of blinding across a number of included studies reduced our confidence in the findings. Thus results must be interpreted with caution. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We conclude that there is moderate-quality evidence that regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of developing PPP after three to 18 months after thoracotomy and three to 12 months after caesarean section. There is low-quality evidence that regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of developing PPP three to 12 months after breast cancer surgery. There is moderate evidence that intravenous infusion of local anaesthetics may reduce the risk of developing PPP three to six months after breast cancer surgery.Our conclusions are considerably weakened by the small size and number of studies, by performance bias, null bias, attrition and missing data. Larger, high-quality studies, including children, are needed. We caution that except for breast surgery, our evidence synthesis is based on only a few small studies. On a cautionary note, we cannot extend our conclusions to other surgical interventions or regional anaesthesia techniques, for example we cannot conclude that paravertebral block reduces the risk of PPP after thoracotomy. There are seven ongoing studies and 12 studies awaiting classification that may change the conclusions of the current review once they are published and incorporated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica J Weinstein
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University1300 Morris Park AveBronxUSA10461
| | - Jacob L Levene
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University1300 Morris Park AveBronxUSA10461
| | - Marc S Cohen
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology111 E 210 StreetBronxUSA#N4‐005
| | - Doerthe A Andreae
- Milton S Hershey Medical CenterDepartment of Allergy/ Immunology500 University DrHersheyUSA17033
| | - Jerry Y Chao
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology111 E 210 StreetBronxUSA#N4‐005
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Teachers College, Columbia UniversityHuman DevelopmentNew YorkUSA10027
| | - Charles B Hall
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health1300 Morris Park AvenueBronxUSA10461
| | - Michael H Andreae
- Milton S Hershey Medical CentreDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine500 University DriveH187HersheyUSA17033
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Arendt‐Nielsen L, Morlion B, Perrot S, Dahan A, Dickenson A, Kress H, Wells C, Bouhassira D, Drewes AM. Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. Eur J Pain 2018; 22:216-241. [DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 376] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
AbstractDifferent neuroplastic processes can occur along the nociceptive pathways and may be important in the transition from acute to chronic pain and for diagnosis and development of optimal management strategies. The neuroplastic processes may result in gain (sensitisation) or loss (desensitisation) of function in relation to the incoming nociceptive signals. Such processes play important roles in chronic pain, and although the clinical manifestations differ across condition processes, they share some common mechanistic features. The fundamental understanding and quantitative assessment of particularly some of the central sensitisation mechanisms can be translated from preclinical studies into the clinic. The clinical perspectives are implementation of such novel information into diagnostics, mechanistic phenotyping, prevention, personalised treatment, and drug development. The aims of this paper are to introduce and discuss (1) some common fundamental central pain mechanisms, (2) how they may translate into the clinical signs and symptoms across different chronic pain conditions, (3) how to evaluate gain and loss of function using quantitative pain assessment tools, and (4) the implications for optimising prevention and management of pain. The chronic pain conditions selected for the paper are neuropathic pain in general, musculoskeletal pain (chronic low back pain and osteoarthritic pain in particular), and visceral pain (irritable bowel syndrome in particular). The translational mechanisms addressed are local and widespread sensitisation, central summation, and descending pain modulation.SignificanceCentral sensitisation is an important manifestation involved in many different chronic pain conditions. Central sensitisation can be different to assess and evaluate as the manifestations vary from pain condition to pain condition. Understanding central sensitisation may promote better profiling and diagnosis of pain patients and development of new regimes for mechanism based therapy. Some of the mechanisms underlying central sensitisation can be translated from animals to humans providing new options in development of therapies and profiling drugs under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - B. Morlion
- The Leuven Centre for Algology University Hospitals Leuven University of Leuven Belgium
| | - S. Perrot
- INSERM U987 Pain Center Cochin Hospital Paris Descartes University Paris France
| | - A. Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - A. Dickenson
- Neuroscience Physiology & Pharmacology University College London UK
| | - H.G. Kress
- Department of Special Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Medizinische Universität/AKH Wien Vienna Austria
| | | | - D. Bouhassira
- INSERM U987 Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur Hôpital Ambroise Paré Boulogne Billancourt France
| | - A. Mohr Drewes
- Mech‐Sense Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinical Institute Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lee J, Park HP, Jeong MH, Son JD, Kim HC. Efficacy of ketamine for postoperative pain following robotic thyroidectomy: A prospective randomised study. J Int Med Res 2017; 46:1109-1120. [PMID: 29124992 PMCID: PMC5972244 DOI: 10.1177/0300060517734679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Although robotic thyroidectomy (RoT) is a minimally invasive surgery, percutaneous tunneling causes moderate to severe pain immediately postoperatively. We evaluated the efficacy of ketamine for postoperative pain management in patients following RoT. Methods Sixty-four patients scheduled for RoT were randomly divided into two groups. In the ketamine group (n = 32), ketamine was infused from induction of anaesthesia until the end of the procedure (0.15-mg/kg bolus with continuous infusion at 2 µg/kg/min). In the control group (n = 32), the same volume of saline was infused. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for acute and chronic pain, the incidence of hypoesthesia, postoperative analgesic requirements, and complications related to opioids or ketamine were compared between the two groups. Results The VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group up to 24 h postoperatively. The VAS pain score when coughing was significantly higher in the control group than in the ketamine group at 24 h postoperatively. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the control group required rescue analgesics. Complications were comparable in both groups. Conclusions Ketamine infusion decreased pain scores for 24 h postoperatively and reduced analgesic requirements without serious complications in patients following RoT. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01997801
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiwon Lee
- 1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hee-Pyoung Park
- 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mu-Hui Jeong
- 1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, Korea
| | - Je-Do Son
- 1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyun-Chang Kim
- 1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Anwar S, O'Brien B. The role of intraoperative interventions to minimise chronic postsurgical pain. Br J Pain 2017; 11:186-191. [PMID: 29123663 DOI: 10.1177/2049463717720640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is the most common complication following surgery, with increasing evidence of both its prevalence and severity. While awareness of the various risk factors for this long-term condition is also increasing, effective prevention remains elusive. In this review, we describe the increasing evidence for preventive or 'protective' strategies. Controversies and conflicting human data are presented along with suggestions for improved future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibtain Anwar
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Ben O'Brien
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jendoubi A, Naceur IB, Bouzouita A, Trifa M, Ghedira S, Chebil M, Houissa M. A comparison between intravenous lidocaine and ketamine on acute and chronic pain after open nephrectomy: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth 2017; 11:177-184. [PMID: 28442956 PMCID: PMC5389236 DOI: 10.4103/1658-354x.203027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, there has been increasing interest in the use of analgesic adjuncts such as intravenous (IV) ketamine and lidocaine. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of perioperative IV lidocaine and ketamine on morphine requirements, pain scores, quality of recovery, and chronic pain after open nephrectomy. STUDY DESIGN A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. SETTINGS The study was conducted in Charles Nicolle University Hospital of Tunis. METHODS Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive IV lidocaine: bolus of 1.5 mg/kg at the induction of anesthesia followed by infusion of 1 mg/kg/h intraoperatively and for 24 h postoperatively or ketamine: bolus of 0.15 mg/kg followed by infusion of 0.1 mg/kg/h intraoperatively and for 24 h postoperatively or an equal volume of saline (control group [CG]). MEASUREMENTS Morphine consumption, visual analog scale pain scores, time to the first passage of flatus and feces, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at discharge, and the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain using the "Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire" at 3 months. RESULTS Ketamine and lidocaine reduced significantly morphine consumption (by about 33% and 42%, respectively) and pain scores compared with the CG (P < 0.001). Lidocaine and ketamine also significantly improved bowel function in comparison to the CG (P < 0.001). Ketamine failed to reduce the incidence of PONV. The 6 MWD increased significantly from a mean ± standard deviation of 27 ± 16.2 m in the CG to 82.3 ± 28 m in the lidocaine group (P < 0.001). Lidocaine, but not ketamine, reduced significantly the development of neuropathic pain at 3 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Ketamine and lidocaine are safe and effective adjuvants to decrease opioid consumption and control early pain. We also suggest that lidocaine infusion serves as an interesting alternative to improve the functional walking capacity and prevent chronic neuropathic pain at 3 months after open nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Jendoubi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Urology, Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Imed Ben Naceur
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Urology, Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Abderrazak Bouzouita
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Urology, Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mehdi Trifa
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Children Hospital of Tunis, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Salma Ghedira
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Urology, Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Chebil
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Urology, Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Houissa
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Urology, Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Audit of postoperative pain management after open thoracotomy and the incidence of chronic postthoracotomy pain in more than 500 patients at a tertiary center. J Clin Anesth 2016; 36:174-177. [PMID: 28183561 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Revised: 09/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality of postoperative pain relief during the first 3 days after surgery and to evaluate with the incidence of persistent pain at 6 months after surgery. DESIGN Retrospective single-center audit. SETTING University hospital. PATIENTS Five hundred four patients who underwent thoracotomy. INTERVENTIONS Review of patient records, questionnaire, and telephone review. RESULTS Of the 364 survivors, 306 were contacted. Five or more episodes of severe pain (numerical rating scale >6/10 at rest or movement) during the first 72 hours after surgery occurred in 133 patients. Persistent postsurgical pain at 6 months was present in 82% (109/133) of these patients. Patient satisfaction with acute postoperative pain management was excellent (36%), good (43%), and fair or poor (21%).The incidence of postthoracotomy pain was 56% (mild 32%, moderate 18%, and severe 6%). CONCLUSIONS Poorly controlled acute postoperative pain correlated with persistent postsurgical pain at 6 months. In view of such a high incidence in thoracotomy patients, preventative strategies assume great significance.
Collapse
|
35
|
Postthoracotomy Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain: A Literature Review on Characteristics and Treatment. Pain Res Manag 2016; 2016:3652726. [PMID: 28018130 PMCID: PMC5149649 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3652726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Context. Postthoracotomy Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain (IPS) is a common and sometimes intractable pain syndrome. IPS is different from chest wall pain in type, origin, and treatments. Various treatments are suggested or applied for it but none of them is regarded as popular accepted effective one. Objectives. To review data and collect all present experiences about postthoracotomy IPS and its management and suggest future research directions. Methods. Search in PubMed database and additional search for specific topics and review them to retrieve relevant articles as data source in a narrative review article. Results. Even in the presence of effective epidural analgesia, ISP is a common cause of severe postthoracotomy pain. The phrenic nerve has an important role in the physiopathology of postthoracotomy ISP. Different treatments have been applied or suggested. Controlling the afferent nociceptive signals conveyed by the phrenic nerve at various levels—from peripheral branches on the diaphragm to its entrance in the cervical spine—could be of therapeutic value. Despite potential concerns about safety, intrapleural or phrenic nerve blocks are tolerated well, at least in a selected group of patient. Conclusion. Further researches could be directed on selective sensory block and motor function preservation of the phrenic nerve. However, the safety and efficacy of temporary loss of phrenic nerve function and intrapleural local anesthetics should be assessed.
Collapse
|
36
|
Jabbary Moghaddam M, Barkhori A, Mirkheshti A, Hashemian M, Amir Mohajerani S. The Effect of Pre-Emptive Dexmedetomidine on the Incidence of Post-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Anesth Pain Med 2016; 6:e36344. [PMID: 27660748 PMCID: PMC5027128 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.36344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is pain that recurs or persists along a thoracotomy incision for at least two months following surgery. Dexmedetomidine (dex) is an α-2 agonist that also has analgesic, sedative-hypnotic, and sympatholytic properties. Objectives To determine the effect of pre-emptive dexmedetomidine on the incidence of PTPS in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients and Methods This randomized clinical trial enrolled 104 candidates for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and randomly assigned them to either a dex group or a control group. In the dex group, dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg/hour was infused from the initiation of anesthesia until postoperative extubation in the intensive-care unit. Two months after surgery, the patients were contacted by telephone and interviewed to determine the presence of pain at the thoracotomy scars. Results Fifty-four patients were placed in the control group, and 50 patients were assigned to the dex group. The age, sex, and body mass index were not significantly different between the two groups of study (P > 0.05). The incidence of PTPS was 11/50 (22%) patients in the dex group and 28/54 patients (52%) in the control group. A chi-square test revealed a significant difference in the incidence of PTPS after two months between the dex and control groups (P = 0.032). Conclusions PTPS is a common problem following CABG, and pre-emptive therapy with dex may decrease neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ali Barkhori
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Alireza Mirkheshti
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Hashemian
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
- Corresponding author: Morteza Hashemian, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. Tel: +98-9121342757, Fax: +98-3432239188, E-mail:
| | - Seyed Amir Mohajerani
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rodriguez-Aldrete D, Candiotti KA, Janakiraman R, Rodriguez-Blanco YF. Trends and New Evidence in the Management of Acute and Chronic Post-Thoracotomy Pain—An Overview of the Literature from 2005 to 2015. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016; 30:762-72. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
38
|
Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2016; 156:1184-1197. [PMID: 25887465 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Although certain risk factors can identify individuals who are most likely to develop chronic pain, few interventions to prevent chronic pain have been identified. To facilitate the identification of preventive interventions, an IMMPACT meeting was convened to discuss research design considerations for clinical trials investigating the prevention of chronic pain. We present general design considerations for prevention trials in populations that are at relatively high risk for developing chronic pain. Specific design considerations included subject identification, timing and duration of treatment, outcomes, timing of assessment, and adjusting for risk factors in the analyses. We provide a detailed examination of 4 models of chronic pain prevention (ie, chronic postsurgical pain, postherpetic neuralgia, chronic low back pain, and painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy). The issues discussed can, in many instances, be extrapolated to other chronic pain conditions. These examples were selected because they are representative models of primary and secondary prevention, reflect persistent pain resulting from multiple insults (ie, surgery, viral infection, injury, and toxic or noxious element exposure), and are chronically painful conditions that are treated with a range of interventions. Improvements in the design of chronic pain prevention trials could improve assay sensitivity and thus accelerate the identification of efficacious interventions. Such interventions would have the potential to reduce the prevalence of chronic pain in the population. Additionally, standardization of outcomes in prevention clinical trials will facilitate meta-analyses and systematic reviews and improve detection of preventive strategies emerging from clinical trials.
Collapse
|
39
|
Mazzeffi M, Johnson K, Paciullo C. Ketamine in adult cardiac surgery and the cardiac surgery Intensive Care Unit: an evidence-based clinical review. Ann Card Anaesth 2016; 18:202-9. [PMID: 25849690 PMCID: PMC4881646 DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.154478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Ketamine is a unique anesthetic drug that provides analgesia, hypnosis, and amnesia with minimal respiratory and cardiovascular depression. Because of its sympathomimetic properties it would seem to be an excellent choice for patients with depressed ventricular function in cardiac surgery. However, its use has not gained widespread acceptance in adult cardiac surgery patients, perhaps due to its perceived negative psychotropic effects. Despite this limitation, it is receiving renewed interest in the United States as a sedative and analgesic drug for critically ill-patients. In this manuscript, the authors provide an evidence-based clinical review of ketamine use in cardiac surgery patients for intensive care physicians, cardio-thoracic anesthesiologists, and cardio-thoracic surgeons. All MEDLINE indexed clinical trials performed during the last 20 years in adult cardiac surgery patients were included in the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mazzeffi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Clarke H, Poon M, Weinrib A, Katznelson R, Wentlandt K, Katz J. Preventive analgesia and novel strategies for the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain. Drugs 2016; 75:339-51. [PMID: 25752774 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-015-0365-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a serious complication of major surgery that can impair a patient's quality of life. The development of CPSP is a complex process which involves biologic, psychosocial, and environmental mechanisms that have yet to be fully understood. Currently perioperative pharmacologic interventions aim to suppress and prevent sensitization with the aim of reducing pain and analgesic requirement in acute as well as long-term pain . Despite the detrimental effects of CPSP on patients, the body of literature focused on treatment strategies to reduce CPSP remains limited and continues to be understudied. This article reviews the main pharmacologic candidates for the treatment of CPSP, discusses the future of preventive analgesia, and considers novel strategies to help treat acute post-operative pain and lessen the risk that it becomes chronic. In addition, this article highlights important areas of focus for clinical practice including: multimodal management of CPSP patients, psychological modifiers of the pain experience, and the development of a Transitional Pain Service specifically designed to manage patients at high risk of developing chronic post-surgical pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hance Clarke
- Pain Research Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Eaton North 3 EB 317, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
General anaesthetic agents do not influence persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32:697-704. [DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
42
|
Fiorelli A, Mazzella A, Santini M. eReply. Is the pre-emptive administration of ketamine able to prevent chronic post-thoracotomy pain? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Dualé C, Gayraud G, Taheri H, Bastien O, Schoeffler P. A French Nationwide Survey on Anesthesiologist-Perceived Barriers to the Use of Epidural and Paravertebral Block in Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29:942-9. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
44
|
Klatt E, Zumbrunn T, Bandschapp O, Girard T, Ruppen W. Intra- and postoperative intravenous ketamine does not prevent chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Pain 2015; 7:42-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
The development of postoperative chronic pain (POCP) after surgery is a major problem with a considerable socioeconomic impact. It is defined as pain lasting more than the usual healing, often more than 2–6 months. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate that the N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist ketamine given peri- and intraoperatively can reduce immediate postoperative pain, especially if severe postoperative pain is expected and regional anaesthesia techniques are impossible. However, the results concerning the role of ketamine in preventing chronic postoperative pain are conflicting. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and a pooled analysis to determine if peri- and intraoperative ketamine can reduce the incidence of chronic postoperative pain.
Methods
Electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane including data until September 2013 were conducted. Subsequently, the titles and abstracts were read, and reference lists of reviews and retrieved studies were reviewed for additional studies. Where necessary, authors were contacted to obtain raw data for statistical analysis. Papers reporting on ketamine used in the intra- and postoperative setting with pain measured at least 4 weeks after surgery were identified. For meta-analysis of pain after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, the results were summarised in a forest plot, indicating the number of patients with and without pain in the ketamine and the control groups. The cut-off value used for the VAS/NRS scales was 3 (range 0–10), which is a generally well-accepted value with clinical impact in view of quality of life.
Results
Our analysis identified ten papers for the comprehensive meta-analysis, including a total of 784 patients. Three papers, which included a total of 303 patients, reported a positive outcome concerning persistent postsurgical pain. In the analysis, only one of nine pooled estimates of postoperative pain at rest or in motion after 1, 3, 6 or 12 months, defined as a value ≥3 on a visual analogue scale of 0–10, indicated a marginally significant pain reduction.
Conclusions
Based on the currently available data, there is currently not sufficient evidence to support a reduction in chronic pain due to perioperative administration of ketamine. Only the analysis of postoperative pain at rest after 1 month resulted in a marginally significant reduction of chronic postoperative pain using ketamine in the perioperative setting.
Implications
It can be hypothesised, that regional anaesthesia in addition to the administration of perioperative ketamine might have a preventive effect on the development of persistent postsurgical pain. An additional high-quality pain relief intra- and postoperatively as well after discharge could be more effective than any particular analgesic method per se. It is an assumption that a low dose infusion ketamine has to be administered for more than 72 h to reduce the risk of chronic postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Klatt
- Department for Anaesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy , University of Basel Hospital , CH-4031 Basel Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zumbrunn
- Clinical Trial Unit , University of Basel Hospital CH-4031 Basel Switzerland
| | - Oliver Bandschapp
- Department for Anaesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy , University of Basel Hospital , CH-4031 Basel Switzerland
| | - Thierry Girard
- Department for Anaesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy , University of Basel Hospital , CH-4031 Basel Switzerland
| | - Wilhelm Ruppen
- Department for Anaesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy , University of Basel Hospital , CH-4031 Basel Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kolettas A, Lazaridis G, Baka S, Mpoukovinas I, Karavasilis V, Kioumis I, Pitsiou G, Papaiwannou A, Lampaki S, Karavergou A, Pataka A, Machairiotis N, Katsikogiannis N, Mpakas A, Tsakiridis K, Fassiadis N, Zarogoulidis K, Zarogoulidis P. Postoperative pain management. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7:S62-72. [PMID: 25774311 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2014] [Accepted: 01/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Postoperative pain is a very important issue for several patients. Indifferent of the surgery type or method, pain management is very necessary. The relief from suffering leads to early mobilization, less hospital stay, reduced hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction. An individual approach should be applied for pain control, rather than a fix dose or drugs. Additionally, medical, psychological, and physical condition, age, level of fear or anxiety, surgical procedure, personal preference, and response to agents given should be taken into account. The major goal in the management of postoperative pain is minimizing the dose of medications to lessen side effects while still providing adequate analgesia. Again a multidisciplinary team approach should be pursued planning and formulating a plan for pain relief, particularly in complicated patients, such as those who have medical comorbidities. These patients might appear increase for analgesia-related complications or side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Kolettas
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - George Lazaridis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Sofia Baka
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Ioannis Mpoukovinas
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Vasilis Karavasilis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Ioannis Kioumis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Georgia Pitsiou
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Antonis Papaiwannou
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Sofia Lampaki
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Anastasia Karavergou
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Athanasia Pataka
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Nikolaos Machairiotis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Nikolaos Katsikogiannis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Andreas Mpakas
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Kosmas Tsakiridis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Nikolaos Fassiadis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| | - Paul Zarogoulidis
- 1 Anesthisiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 6 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 7 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, St. George's, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hopkins KG, Hoffman LA, Dabbs ADV, Ferson PF, King L, Dudjak LA, Zullo TG, Rosenzweig MQ. Postthoracotomy Pain Syndrome Following Surgery for Lung Cancer: Symptoms and Impact on Quality of Life. J Adv Pract Oncol 2015; 6:121-32. [PMID: 26649245 PMCID: PMC4601892 DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2015.6.2.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Postthoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is a common complication following thoracic surgery. Most studies examining the influence of PTPS on patient-reported symptoms include few patients managed using a minimally invasive approach. Associated sensory changes, potentially neuropathic in origin, are not well described. We therefore examined the symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of patients with and without PTPS who underwent a standard thoracotomy (n = 43) or minimally invasive surgery (n = 54). Patients in this prospective, cross-sectional study completed questionnaires to assess pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire), neuropathic symptoms (Neuropathic Symptom Questionnaire), symptom distress (Symptom Distress Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and QOL (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy–Lung). Excepting younger age (p = .009), no demographic or surgical characteristic differentiated patients with and without PTPS. Patients with PTPS described discomfort as pain only (15.1%), neuropathic symptoms only (30.2%) or pain and neuropathic symptoms (54.7%). Scores differed between patients with and without PTPS for symptom distress (p < .001), anxiety and depression (p < .001), and QOL (p = .009), with higher distress associated with PTPS. Despite new surgical techniques, PTPS remains common and results in considerable distress. A focused assessment is needed to identify all experiencing this condition, with referral to pain management specialists if symptoms persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen G Hopkins
- Carlow University College of Health and Wellness, Department of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Leslie A Hoffman
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Peter F Ferson
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Linda King
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Linda A Dudjak
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas G Zullo
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
McKeown A, Gewandter JS, McDermott MP, Pawlowski JR, Poli JJ, Rothstein D, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Katz NP, Lin AH, Rappaport BA, Rowbotham MC, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Smith SM. Reporting of sample size calculations in analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2014; 16:199-206.e1-7. [PMID: 25481494 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Revised: 11/10/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Sample size calculations determine the number of participants required to have sufficiently high power to detect a given treatment effect. In this review, we examined the reporting quality of sample size calculations in 172 publications of double-blind randomized controlled trials of noninvasive pharmacologic or interventional (ie, invasive) pain treatments published in European Journal of Pain, Journal of Pain, and Pain from January 2006 through June 2013. Sixty-five percent of publications reported a sample size calculation but only 38% provided all elements required to replicate the calculated sample size. In publications reporting at least 1 element, 54% provided a justification for the treatment effect used to calculate sample size, and 24% of studies with continuous outcome variables justified the variability estimate. Publications of clinical pain condition trials reported a sample size calculation more frequently than experimental pain model trials (77% vs 33%, P < .001) but did not differ in the frequency of reporting all required elements. No significant differences in reporting of any or all elements were detected between publications of trials with industry and nonindustry sponsorship. Twenty-eight percent included a discrepancy between the reported number of planned and randomized participants. This study suggests that sample size calculation reporting in analgesic trial publications is usually incomplete. Investigators should provide detailed accounts of sample size calculations in publications of clinical trials of pain treatments, which is necessary for reporting transparency and communication of pre-trial design decisions. PERSPECTIVE In this systematic review of analgesic clinical trials, sample size calculations and the required elements (eg, treatment effect to be detected; power level) were incompletely reported. A lack of transparency regarding sample size calculations may raise questions about the appropriateness of the calculated sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew McKeown
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Jennifer S Gewandter
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Michael P McDermott
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Department of Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Joseph R Pawlowski
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Joseph J Poli
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Daniel Rothstein
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - John T Farrar
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ian Gilron
- Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathaniel P Katz
- Analgesic Solutions, Natick, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Allison H Lin
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Bob A Rappaport
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | - Dennis C Turk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert H Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Department of Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Shannon M Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
MCNICOL ED, SCHUMANN R, HAROUTOUNIAN S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ketamine for the prevention of persistent post-surgical pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58:1199-213. [PMID: 25060512 DOI: 10.1111/aas.12377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
While post-operative pain routinely resolves, persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) is common in certain surgeries; it causes disability, lowers quality of life and has economic consequences. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the effectiveness of ketamine in reducing the prevalence and severity of PPSP and to assess safety associated with its use. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE through December 2012 for articles in any language. We included randomized, controlled trials in adults in which ketamine was administered perioperatively via any route. Seventeen studies, the majority of which administered ketamine intravenously, met all inclusion criteria. The overall risk of developing PPSP was not significantly reduced at any time point in the ketamine group vs. placebo, nor did comparisons of pain severity scores reach statistical significance. Sensitivity analysis of exclusively intravenous ketamine studies included in this meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions in risk of developing PPSP at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). Adverse event rates were similar between ketamine and placebo groups. The study data from our review are heterogeneous and demonstrate efficacy of intravenously administered ketamine only in comparison with placebo. Highly variable timing and dosing of ketamine in these studies suggest that no unifying effective regimen has emerged. Future research should focus on clinically relevant outcomes, should stratify patients with pre-existing pain and possible central sensitization and should enroll sufficiently large numbers to account for loss to follow-up in long-term studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. D. MCNICOL
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacy; Tufts Medical Center; Boston MA USA
| | - R. SCHUMANN
- Department of Anesthesiology; Tufts Medical Center; Boston MA USA
| | - S. HAROUTOUNIAN
- Department of Anesthesiology; Washington University in St Louis; St Louis MO USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Niesters M, Martini C, Dahan A. Ketamine for chronic pain: risks and benefits. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 77:357-67. [PMID: 23432384 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2012] [Accepted: 02/11/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The anaesthetic ketamine is used to treat various chronic pain syndromes, especially those that have a neuropathic component. Low dose ketamine produces strong analgesia in neuropathic pain states, presumably by inhibition of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor although other mechanisms are possibly involved, including enhancement of descending inhibition and anti-inflammatory effects at central sites. Current data on short term infusions indicate that ketamine produces potent analgesia during administration only, while three studies on the effect of prolonged infusion (4-14 days) show long-term analgesic effects up to 3 months following infusion. The side effects of ketamine noted in clinical studies include psychedelic symptoms (hallucinations, memory defects, panic attacks), nausea/vomiting, somnolence, cardiovascular stimulation and, in a minority of patients, hepatoxicity. The recreational use of ketamine is increasing and comes with a variety of additional risks ranging from bladder and renal complications to persistent psychotypical behaviour and memory defects. Blind extrapolation of these risks to clinical patients is difficult because of the variable, high and recurrent exposure to the drug in ketamine abusers and the high frequency of abuse of other illicit substances in this population. In clinical settings, ketamine is well tolerated, especially when benzodiazepines are used to tame the psychotropic side effects. Irrespective, close monitoring of patients receiving ketamine is mandatory, particularly aimed at CNS, haemodynamic, renal and hepatic symptoms as well as abuse. Further research is required to assess whether the benefits outweigh the risks and costs. Until definite proof is obtained ketamine administration should be restricted to patients with therapy-resistant severe neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Niesters
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Humble SR, Dalton AJ, Li L. A systematic review of therapeutic interventions to reduce acute and chronic post-surgical pain after amputation, thoracotomy or mastectomy. Eur J Pain 2014; 19:451-65. [PMID: 25088289 PMCID: PMC4405062 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Perioperative neuropathic pain is under-recognized and often undertreated. Chronic pain may develop after any routine surgery, but it can have a far greater incidence after amputation, thoracotomy or mastectomy. The peak noxious barrage due to the neural trauma associated with these operations may be reduced in the perioperative period with the potential to reduce the risk of chronic pain. Databases and data treatment A systematic review of the evidence for perioperative interventions reducing acute and chronic pain associated with amputation, mastectomy or thoracotomy. Results Thirty-two randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Gabapentinoids reduced pain after mastectomy, but a single dose was ineffective for thoracotomy patients who had an epidural. Gabapentinoids were ineffective for vascular amputees with pre-existing chronic pain. Venlafaxine was associated with less chronic pain after mastectomy. Intravenous and topical lidocaine and perioperative EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic) cream reduced the incidence of chronic pain after mastectomy, whereas local anaesthetic infiltration appeared ineffective. The majority of the trials investigating regional analgesia found it to be beneficial for chronic symptoms. Ketamine and intercostal cryoanalgesia offered no reduction in chronic pain. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) reduced the incidence of post-thoracotomy pain in one study, whereas high-dose remifentanil exacerbated chronic pain in another. Conclusions Appropriate dose regimes of gabapentinoids, antidepressants, local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia may potentially reduce the severity of both acute and chronic pain for patients. Ketamine was not effective at reducing chronic pain. Intercostal cryoanalgesia was not effective and has the potential to increase the risk of chronic pain. TIVA may be beneficial but the effects of opioids are unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Humble
- Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Management, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK; Peripheral Neuropathy Unit, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|