Failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: prevention, identification and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is an increasing awareness of the significance of intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery. Failure of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery can occur preoperatively or intraoperatively. Testing of the neuraxial block can identify preoperative failure. Recognition of the risk of high neuraxial block in repeat spinal in case of preoperative failure is important.

RECENT FINDING

Knowledge of risk factors for block failure facilitates prevention by selecting the most appropriate neuraxial procedure, adequate intrathecal doses and choice of technique. Intraoperative pain is not uncommon, and neither obstetricians nor anesthesiologists can adequately identify intraoperative pain. Early intraoperative pain should be treated differently from pain towards the end of surgery.

SUMMARY

Block testing is crucial to identify preoperative failure of spinal anesthesia. Repeat neuraxial is possible but care must be taken with dosing. In this situation, switching to a combined spinal epidural or an epidural technique can be useful. Intraoperative pain must be acknowledged and adequately treated, including offering general anesthesia. Preoperative informed consent should include block failure and its management.

Is crystalloid co-loading necessary to prevent spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery? A randomized double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Hypotension is common during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Preventive strategies include fluid loading and phenylephrine. We hypothesized that if prophylactic phenylephrine infusion is used, omission of fluid loading would be non-inferior to fluid co-loading in maintaining cardiac output. We assumed that if there was a difference, the increase in cardiac output would be greater in the no-loading than in the co-loading group.

METHODS

Term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomized to receive 1 L crystalloid co-loading or maintenance fluids only. Phenylephrine was titrated to maintain blood pressure. Changes in cardiac output following spinal anesthesia were the primary outcome. The study was powered as a non-inferiority trial, allowing the no-loading arm to have a 50% greater change in cardiac output. Heart rate, dose of phenylephrine, occurrence of nausea and vomiting, Apgar scores and neonatal acid base status were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Data from 63 women were analyzed. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was 33% less increase in cardiac output with no loading (ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.36), and 60% greater reduction of cardiac output with no loading (ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.7). Total dose of phenylephrine was higher in the no-loading group. There may be a less favorable neonatal acid base status without volume loading.

CONCLUSION

Omission of crystalloid co-loading leads to a decrease in cardiac output which has a potentially unfavorable impact on neonatal acid base status. We conclude that crystalloid co-loading may be useful in the presence of phenylephrine infusion.

Does delayed cord clamping result in higher maternal blood loss in primary cesarean sections? A retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVES

The University Hospital Basel implemented delayed umbilical cord clamping of 30-60 s in all laboring women on April 1, 2020. This practice has been widely researched showing substantial benefit for the neonate. Few studies focused on maternal blood loss. The objective of our retrospective comparative study was to assess the impact of immediate vs. delayed cord clamping on maternal blood loss in primary scheduled cesarean sections.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 98 women with singleton gestations undergoing primary scheduled cesarean section at term. Data from procedures with early cord clamping (ECC) were compared to those after implementation of delayed cord clamping (DCC). Primary outcomes were perioperative change in maternal hemoglobin levels, estimated and calculated blood loss. Secondary outcomes included duration of cesarean section and neonatal data.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in the mean perioperative decline of hemoglobin of 10.4 g/L (SD=7.92) and 18.7 g/L (SD=10.4) between the ECC and DCC group, respectively (p<0.001). The estimated (482 mL in ECC vs. 566 mL in DCC (p=0.011)) and the calculated blood loss (438 mL in ECC vs. 715 mL in DCC (p=0.002)) also differed significantly. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study DCC resulted in a statistically significant higher maternal blood loss. In our opinion the widely researched neonatal benefit of DCC outweighs the risk of higher maternal blood loss in low-risk patients. However, maternal risks must be minimized, improvements to preoperative blood management and operative techniques are required.

Functional characterization of RYR1 variants identified in malignant hyperthermia susceptible individuals

Malignant hyperthermia is a pharmacogenetic disorder triggered by halogenated anesthetic agents in genetically predisposed individuals. Approximately 70 % of these individuals carry mutations in RYR1, the gene encoding the ryanodine receptor calcium channel of skeletal muscle. In this study, we performed functional analysis of 5 RYR1 variants identified in members from 8 families who had been diagnosed by the IVCT. Of the 68 individuals enrolled in the study, 43 were diagnosed as MHS, 23 as MHN, and 2 individuals were not tested. Here we demonstrate that the 5 RyR1 variants cause hypersensitivity to RyR1 agonist-mediated calcium release. According to the EMHG scoring matrix these five genetic variants can be classified as follows: c.8638G>A (p.E2880K) and c.11314C>T (p.R3772W) likely pathogenic, c.11416G>A (p.G3806R), c.14627A>G (p.K4876R) and c.14813T>C (p.I4938T), pathogenic (RefSeq NM_000540.3). We propose that the newly functionally characterized RYR1 variants, be included in the panel of variants to be used for the molecular diagnosis of MHS.

Analgesia after cesarean section - what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cesarean section is the most frequent surgical intervention, and pain following cesarean delivery unfortunately remains a common issue. The purpose of this article is to highlight the most effective and efficient options for postcesarean analgesia and to summarize current guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most effective form of postoperative analgesia is through neuraxial morphine. With adequate dosing, clinically relevant respiratory depression is extremely rare. It is important to identify women with increased risk of respiratory depression, as they might require more intensive postoperative monitoring. If neuraxial morphine cannot be used, abdominal wall block or surgical wound infiltration are very valuable alternatives. A multimodal regimen with intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone, fixed doses of paracetamol/acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce postcesarean opioid use. As the use of postoperative lumbar epidural analgesia impairs mobilization, double epidural catheters with lower thoracic epidural analgesia are a possible alternative.

SUMMARY

Adequate analgesia following cesarean delivery is still underused. Simple measures, such as multimodal analgesia regimens should be standardized according to institutional circumstances and defined as part of a treatment plan. Neuraxial morphine should be used whenever possible. If it cannot be used, abdominal wall blocks or surgical wound infiltration are good alternatives.

[Peripartum hemorrhage, diagnostics and treatment : Update of the S2k guidelines AWMF 015/063 from August 2022]

The current S2k guidelines on the diagnostics and treatment of peripartum hemorrhage are summarized in this article from the perspective of anesthesiology based on a fictitious case report. The update of the guidelines was written under the auspices of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics with the participation of other professional societies and interest groups from Germany, Austria and Switzerland and published by the AWMF in 2022 under the register number 015/063.

Updated variant curation expert panel criteria and pathogenicity classifications for 251 variants for RYR1-related malignant hyperthermia susceptibility

The ClinGen malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) variant curation expert panel specified the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathologists (ACMG/AMP) criteria for RYR1-related MHS and a pilot analysis of 84 variants was published. We have now classified an additional 251 variants for RYR1-related MHS according to current ClinGen standards and updated the criteria where necessary. Criterion PS4 was modified such that individuals with multiple RYR1 variants classified as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) were not considered as providing evidence for pathogenicity. Criteria PS1 and PM5 were revised to consider LP variants at the same amino-acid residue as providing evidence for pathogenicity at reduced strength. Finally, PM1 was revised such that if PS1 or PM5 are used PM1, if applicable, should be downgraded to supporting. Of the 251 RYR1 variants, 42 were classified as P/LP, 16 as B/LB, and 193 as VUS. The primary driver of 175 VUS classifications was insufficient evidence supporting pathogenicity, rather than evidence against pathogenicity. Functional data supporting PS3/BS3 was identified for only 13 variants. Based on the posterior probabilities of pathogenicity and variant frequencies in gnomAD, we estimated the prevalence of individuals with RYR1-related MHS pathogenic variants to be between 1/300 and 1/1075, considerably higher than current estimates. We have updated ACMG/AMP criteria for RYR1-related MHS and classified 251 variants. We suggest that prioritization of functional studies is needed to resolve the large number of VUS classifications and allow for appropriate risk assessment. RYR1-related MHS pathogenic variants are likely to be more common than currently appreciated.

POS0288 A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW EVALUATING CONCOMITANT METHOTREXATE DE-ESCALATION PATTERNS IN RA PATIENTS TREATED WITH BIOLOGIC OR TARGETED SYNTHETIC DMARDS

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guidelines recommend methotrexate (MTX) as anchor therapy in combination with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). However, its tolerability is challenging with a significant proportion of patients not adhering to their prescribed MTX regimen following b/tsDMARD initiation. Rates of MTX tapering and withdrawal have been reported elsewhere but Canadian data are lacking.

Objectives

This multi-centre, retrospective chart-based cohort study assessed the frequency of MTX withdrawal or tapering following initiation of a b/tsDMARD in Canadian adults with RA.

Methods

Patients were eligible if they received MTX for ≥3 months before initiation of a b/tsDMARD that was then prescribed continuously for ≥18 months and was initiated in combination with MTX. Patients taking oral prednisone or equivalent at a dose >10 mg per day, and those whose b/tsDMARD was prescribed prior to 2014, were excluded.

Results

Data from 889 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 50.6 years and 72.6% were female. Mean time since diagnosis was approximately 8 years. Of the 46.1% of patients with a documented assessment of disease status at baseline, 62.7% of patients had high disease activity. Baseline mean (SD) MTX dose was 18.9 (6.63) mg/week, administered orally (57.4%), subcutaneously (41.3%), or intramuscularly (1.2%). Overall, 270 (30.4%) patients either tapered (123, 13.8%) or discontinued (147, 16.5%) their MTX within 2 years of initiating the b/tsDMARD. Methotrexate dose was unchanged for 582 (65.5%) subjects and increased for 37 (4.2%) subjects. The prescribed b/tsDMARD was most often a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi,52.1%), followed by a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi, 18.3%), other modes of action (OMA) which included abatacept and rituximab (17.7%) and interleukin-6 inhibitor (IL-6i, 11.9%). The b/tsDMARD type with the highest frequency of MTX Taper or Discontinued was IL-6i (37 patients, 34.9%) followed by TNFi (144 patients, 31.1%), JAKi (47 patients, 28.8%) and OMA (44 patients, 28.0%). In the MTX Discontinued group, the most common reasons for MTX discontinuation were patient decision (27.2%) and adverse events (24.5%). In the MTX Tapered group, the most common reasons for MTX dose change were planned tapering (36.6%) and adverse events (29.3%). In the MTX Increased group, insufficient clinical response (73.0%) was the most common reason provided for MTX dose change. Baseline factors associated with MTX dose discontinuation and tapering by multiple logistic regression were a shorter time since diagnosis (Odds ratio [OR]: 0.981; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.964 – 0.999. P=0.0401), use of non-DMARD medications excluding steroids (OR: 0.683; 95%CI: 0.503 – 0.929. P=0.0150) and a greater number of comorbidities (OR: 1.054; 95%CI: 1.001 – 1.110. P=0.0444). The mean (SD) weekly MTX dose at the end of the data extraction period was 14.13 (4.81) mg for the MTX Tapered group, with 109 (88.6%) subjects taking a weekly MTX dose ≥10 mg. In the MTX Increased group the mean (SD) weekly MTX dose was 22.3 (3.74) mg. Interpretation of the effect of MTX dose on disease activity, fatigue, pain and functional status is challenging due to missing data, but most patients in all 4 groups transitioned to low disease activity or remission during the study period.

Conclusion

Methotrexate withdrawal or tapering occurred in 30.4% of Canadians with RA within two years following b/tsDMARD initiation. There was no evidence of worsening disease activity in these patients. These proportion of Canadian RA patients who reduce or discontinue MTX after the initiation of a ts/bDMARD are generally consistent with those reported in other regions of the world.

Acknowledgements

AbbVie Corp. funded the research for this study and provided writing support for this abstract. AbbVie participated in the study design; study research; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and writing, reviewing, and approving this abstract for submission. All authors had access to the data; participated in the development, review, and approval of the abstract; and agreed to submit this abstract to EULAR 2022.

AbbVie and the authors thank all study investigators for their contributions and the patients who participated in this study. Medical writing support was provided by John Howell PhD of McDougall Scientific and funded by AbbVie, Inc.

Disclosure of Interests

Louis Bessette Speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Sandoz, Gilead, Fresenius Kabi, Consultant of: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Sandoz, Gilead, Fresenius Kabi, Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Sandoz, Gilead, Fresenius Kabi, Brandusa Florica Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Pierre-André Fournier Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Tanya Girard Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Latha Naik Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Dalton Sholter Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Philip Baer Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Teva, Fresenius Kabi, Viatris, Opticann, Novartis, Organon, Gilead, Celltrion, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Teva, Fresenius Kabi, Viatris, Opticann, Novartis, Organon, Gilead, Celltrion, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Teva, Fresenius Kabi, Viatris, Opticann, Novartis, Organon, Gilead, Celltrion, Astra Zeneca, GSK

AB0895 Residual burden and disease activity of Canadian PsA patients treated with advanced therapies: preliminary results from a multiple registry analysis (UNISON-PsA)

Background

Given the availability of advanced therapies in PsA with different modes of action, it is of interest to characterize their impact on overall clinical outcomes.

Objectives

To describe residual disease activity in Canadians with PsA treated with advanced therapies.

Methods

Multi-region, observational, retrospective analysis of data from Rhumadata (Quebec) and International Psoriasis and Arthritis Research Team (IPART) Canadian registries was performed. Data from each registry and region were analyzed separately using a common statistical analysis plan to generate descriptive statistics. Patients included in the registries were eligible if they were adults at the time of PsA diagnosis and were treated with an advanced therapy for ≥6 months initiated between January 2010 and December 2019. Residual disease activity was defined as failing to achieve MDA (defined as achieving ≥5 of: TJC ≤1; SJC ≤1; PASI ≤1 or BSA ≤3%; patient pain VAS score of ≤15 mm; patient global disease activity VAS score of ≤20 mm; HAQ score ≤0.5; and tender entheseal points ≤1) (primary endpoint), or DAPSA score ≥14 (secondary endpoint) within 6 months of initiation of an advanced therapy (TNFi, IL-12/23i, IL-17i, PDE4i, CTLA4i or JAKi).

Results

1,866 subjects (Atlantic [IPART; Newfoundland]: N=83; Quebec [Rhumadata]: N=687; Ontario [IPART]: N=966; West [IPART; British Columbia, Manitoba]: N=130) were included in this preliminary analysis. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Overall, 899 were receiving their 1st advanced therapy, 464 were receiving their 2nd, and 264 had received ≥3. The most common therapy class was TNFi, followed by IL-17i. 18/21 (85.7%) subjects in the Atlantic region with an assessment, 184/246 (74.8%) in Quebec, 391/571 (68.1%) in Ontario, and 30/43 (69.8%) in Western Canada failed to achieve MDA within 6 months following advanced therapy initiation. Failure to achieve MDA within the allotted period was higher among patients receiving an IL-17i compared with a TNFi. There was no appreciable effect of lines of therapy. Also, 74 of 110 (67.3%) patients with an assessment in Quebec, 201/365 (55.1%) in Ontario and 3/3 (100%) in the West failed to achieve at least low disease activity (LDA; DAPSA ≤14) within 6 months following initiation of an advanced therapy. Data were not available for the Atlantic region. The proportion of patients not achieving LDA by advanced therapy was similar for those receiving a TNFi and IL-17i but increased with line of therapy.

Table 1.

Patient demographic and baseline characteristics, and response to treatment

Atlantic (N=83)Quebec (N=687)Ontario (N=966)West (N=130)Age (years, mean [SD])50.3 (11.1)50.7 (12.1)49.1 (12.9)46.7 (12.1)Female (n [%])44/83 (53.0)346/687 (50.4)427/966 (44.2)81/128 (62.3)BMI (kg/m2, n, mean [SD])15, 30.8 (3.6)553, 29.6 (6.6)579, 30.6 (6.9)45, 32.8 (10.6)Time since diagnosis (years, N, mean [SD])83, 8.7 (8.7)687, 7.1 (7.9)895, 11.7 (11.1)74, 11.7 (8.9)HLA-B27 positive (n/N [%])N/A58/335 (17.3)86/648 (13.3)N/APresence of EAMs (n/N [%])4/44 (9.1)27/687 (3.9)65/693 (9.4)2/33 (6.1%)Fulfillment of CASPAR (n/N [%])N/A391/687 (56.9)100/100 (100)N/ATherapy class (n [%]):*TNFi66 (79.5)478 (69.6)651 (67.3)104 (80.0)IL-17i11 (13.3)106 (15.4)191 (19.9)21 (16.2)IL-12/23i6 (7.2)33 (4.8)124 (12.9)5 (3.9)PDE4i48 (7.0)Other22 (3.2)Failure to achieve MDA within 6 months of starting therapy (n/N [%])**18/21 (87.5)184/246 (74.8)391/571 (68.1)30/43 (69.8)Failure to achieve DAPSA ≤14 within 6 months of starting therapy (n/N [%])**N/A74/110 (67.3)201/365 (55.1)3/3 (100.0)

*Patients may be taking >1 advanced therapy, **Not all patients had assessments of disease activity.

Conclusion

Preliminary data show approximately three quarters of Canadians with PsA failed to achieve MDA or LDA within 6 months of initiating an advanced therapy. Disease duration is a possible explanation for not achieving MDA or LDA; better therapeutic approaches are needed to achieve these outcomes in patients with PsA.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Steve Ramkissoon, for supporting the statistical analysis of the IPART registry. Medical writing and statistical support (funded by Abbvie) were provided by John Howell and Hong Chen, respectively, from McDougall Scientific. Financial support for the study was provided by AbbVie. AbbVie participated in the design of the study, interpretation of data, review, and approval of this publication. All authors contributed to the development of the publication and maintained control over the final content.

Disclosure of Interests

Denis Choquette Speakers bureau: Amgen, Abbvie, CIHR, Novartis, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Tevapharm, Consultant of: Amgen, Abbvie, CIHR, Novartis, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Tevapharm, Grant/research support from: Rhumadata is supported through grants and research contracts from Amgen, Abbvie, CIHR, Novartis, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Tevapharm., Vinod Chandran Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer, Employee of: Spouse is an employee of AstraZeneca, Marie-Claude Laliberté Shareholder of: AbbVie Corp., Employee of: AbbVie Corp., Pierre-André Fournier Shareholder of: AbbVie Corp., Employee of: AbbVie Corp., Tanya Girard Shareholder of: AbbVie Corp., Employee of: AbbVie Corp., Mitchell Sutton: None declared, Dafna D Gladman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB

[Postpartum hemorrhage : Interdisciplinary consideration in the context of patient blood management]

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) nowadays still represents a severe complication of both a vaginal delivery and a cesarean section. In German-speaking areas a new definition of the term has recently become established and the nomenclature with respect to the severe form of PPH was dropped. The handling of misoprostol as a uterotonic during treatment of PPH is also new, which is available in Germany only as a medical direct import. For adequate diagnostics and targeted treatment interdisciplinary and standardized algorithms should be established and the specialist disciplines involved should be sensitized to this problem. In addition to an adequate hemostasis, a developing coagulopathy must be recognized at an early stage and treated with targeted coagulation management. Through implementation concepts, particularly the second pillar (minimization of blood loss) and the third pillar (rational use of blood transfusions) of patient blood management, various aspects for improvement of treatment of a PPH can be identified.

[Patient blood management in the preparation for birth, obstetrics and postpartum period]

The implementation of patient blood management (PBM) is increasingly becoming standard in operative medicine. Recently, interest has also been shown for the vulnerable collective of pregnant women and neonates. As the information regarding anesthesiological procedures for pregnant women and the peripartum period including an informed consent process should be carried out long before childbirth, this provides a good possibility in this connection to incorporate PBM. An anesthesiological risk estimation as well as the diagnostic workup and treatment of potential anemia should be carried out during the pregnancy. Furthermore, loss of blood in anticipation of bleeding complications should be reduced by interdisciplinary preventive measures and an individually coordinated postpartum care should be organized. This results in an early diagnosis of anemia or iron deficiency with subsequent treatment also postpartum, analogous to the prepartum period.

BMI and malignant hyperthermia pathogenic ryanodine receptor type 1 sequence variants in Switzerland: A retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Ryanodine receptor type 1 (RYR1) sequence variants are pathogenic for malignant hyperthermia. Variant carriers have a subtle increase in resting myoplasmic calcium concentration compared with nonaffected individuals, but whether this has metabolic effects in daily life is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

We analysed the potential effect of malignant hyperthermia-pathogenic RYR1 sequence variants on BMI as a single factor. Due to the heterogeneity of genetic variants predisposing to malignant hyperthermia, and to incomplete information about their regional distribution, we describe the prevalence of RYR1 variants in our population.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single University hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients from malignant hyperthermia families with pathogenic RYR1 sequence variants were selected if BMI was available.

OUTCOME MEASURES

BMI values were compared amongst malignant hyperthermia susceptible (MHS) and malignant hyperthermia-negative individuals using hierarchical multivariable analyses adjusted for age and sex and considering family clustering. Variant prevalence was calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 281 individuals from 42 unrelated malignant hyperthermia families, 109 of whom were MHS and carriers of the familial RYR1 sequence variants. Median [IQR] BMI in MHS individuals with pathogenic RYR1 variants was 22.5 kg m-2 [21.3 to 25.6 kg m-2]. In malignant hyperthermia-negative individuals without variants, median BMI was 23.4 kg m-2 [21.0 to 26.3 kg m-2]. Using multivariable regression adjusted for age and sex, the mean difference was -0.73 (95% CI -1.51 to 0.05). No carrier of a pathogenic RYR1 sequence variant was found to have BMI higher than 30 kg m-2. Only 10 RYR1 variants from the list of the European MH Group were found in our cohort, the most common being p.Val2168Met (39% of families), p.Arg2336His (24%) and p.Arg614Cys (12%).

CONCLUSION

The observed tendency towards lower BMI values in carriers of malignant hyperthermia-pathogenic RYR1 sequence variants points to a possible protective effect on obesity. This study confirms regional differences of the prevalence of malignant hyperthermia-pathogenic RYR1 sequence variants, with just three variants covering 75% of Swiss MHS families.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This manuscript is based on a retrospective analysis.

Functional Characterization of Endogenously Expressed Human RYR1 Variants

More than 700 variants in the RYR1 gene have been identified in patients with different neuromuscular disorders including malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, core myopathies and centronuclear myopathy. Because of the diverse phenotypes linked to RYR1 mutations it is fundamental to characterize their functional effects to classify variants carried by patients for future therapeutic interventions and identify non-pathogenic variants. Many laboratories have been interested in developing methods to functionally characterize RYR1 mutations expressed in patients' cells. This approach has numerous advantages, including: mutations are endogenously expressed, RyR1 is not over-expressed, use of heterologous RyR1 expressing cells is avoided. However, since patients may present mutations in different genes aside RYR1, it is important to compare results from biological material from individuals harboring the same mutation, with different genetic backgrounds. The present manuscript describes methods developed to study the functional effects of endogenously expressed RYR1 variants in: (a) Epstein Barr virus immortalized human B-lymphocytes and (b) satellite cells derived from muscle biopsies and differentiated into myotubes. Changes in the intracellular calcium concentration triggered by the addition of a pharmacological RyR1 activators are then monitored. The selected cell type is loaded with a ratiometric fluorescent calcium indicator and intracellular [Ca²⁺] changes are monitored either at the single cell level by fluorescence microscopy or in cell populations using a spectrofluorometer. The resting [Ca²⁺], agonist dose response curves are then compared between cells from healthy controls and patients harboring RYR1 variants leading to insight into the functional effect of a given variant.

Variant curation expert panel recommendations for RYR1 pathogenicity classifications in malignant hyperthermia susceptibility

Purpose

As a ClinGen Expert Panel (EP) we set out to adapt the ACMG pathogenicity criteria for classification of RYR1 variants as related to autosomal dominantly-inherited malignant hyperthermia (MH).

Methods

We specified ACMG/AMP criteria for variant classification for RYR1 and MH. Proposed rules were piloted on 84 variants. We applied quantitative evidence calibration for several criteria using likelihood ratios based on the Bayesian framework.

Results

Seven ACMG/AMP criteria were adopted without changes, nine were adopted with RYR1-specific modifications, and ten were dropped. The in silico (PP3 and BP4) and hot spot criteria (PM1) were evaluated quantitatively. REVEL gave an odds ratio (OR) of 23:1 for PP3 and 14:1 for BP4 using trichotomized cut-offs of ≥0.85 (pathogenic) and ≤0.5 (benign). The PM1 hotspot criterion had an OR of 24:1. PP3 and PM1 were implemented at moderate strength. Applying the revised ACMG criteria to 44 recognized MH variants, 29 were classified as pathogenic, 13 as likely pathogenic, and two as variants of uncertain significance.

Conclusion

Curation of these variants will facilitate classification of RYR1/MH genomic testing results, which is especially important for secondary findings analyses. Our approach to quantitatively calibrating criteria is generalizable to other variant curation expert panels.

Malignant hyperthermia 2020: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists

Malignant hyperthermia is defined in the International Classification of Diseases as a progressive life-threatening hyperthermic reaction occurring during general anaesthesia. Malignant hyperthermia has an underlying genetic basis, and genetically susceptible individuals are at risk of developing malignant hyperthermia if they are exposed to any of the potent inhalational anaesthetics or suxamethonium. It can also be described as a malignant hypermetabolic syndrome. There are no specific clinical features of malignant hyperthermia and the condition may prove fatal unless it is recognised in its early stages and treatment is promptly and aggressively implemented. The Association of Anaesthetists has previously produced crisis management guidelines intended to be displayed in all anaesthetic rooms as an aide memoire should a malignant hyperthermia reaction occur. The last iteration was produced in 2011 and since then there have been some developments requiring an update. In these guidelines we will provide background information that has been used in updating the crisis management recommendations but will also provide more detailed guidance on the clinical diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia. The scope of these guidelines is extended to include practical guidance for anaesthetists dealing with a case of suspected malignant hyperthermia once the acute reaction has been reversed. This includes information on care and monitoring during and after the event; appropriate equipment and resuscitative measures within the operating theatre and ICU; the importance of communication and teamwork; guidance on counselling of the patient and their family; and how to make a referral of the patient for confirmation of the diagnosis. We also review which patients presenting for surgery may be at increased risk of developing malignant hyperthermia under anaesthesia and what precautions should be taken during the peri-operative management of the patients.

Genomic Screening for Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility

It is timely to consider the utility and practicability of screening for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility using genomic testing. Here the authors pose a simple, but bold question: what would it take to end deaths from malignant hyperthermia? The authors review recent advances and propose a scientific and clinical pathway toward this audacious goal to provoke discussion in the field.

Consensus guidelines on perioperative management of malignant hyperthermia suspected or susceptible patients from the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group

Malignant hyperthermia is a potentially fatal condition, in which genetically predisposed individuals develop a hypermetabolic reaction to potent inhalation anaesthetics or succinylcholine. Because of the rarity of malignant hyperthermia and ethical limitations, there is no evidence from interventional trials to inform the optimal perioperative management of patients known or suspected with malignant hyperthermia who present for surgery. Furthermore, as the concentrations of residual volatile anaesthetics that might trigger a malignant hyperthermia crisis are unknown and manufacturers' instructions differ considerably, there are uncertainties about how individual anaesthetic machines or workstations need to be prepared to avoid inadvertent exposure of susceptible patients to trigger anaesthetic drugs. The present guidelines are intended to bundle the available knowledge about perioperative management of malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patients and the preparation of anaesthesia workstations. The latter aspect includes guidance on the use of activated charcoal filters. The guidelines were developed by members of the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group, and they are based on evaluation of the available literature and a formal consensus process. The most crucial recommendation is that malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patients should receive anaesthesia that is free of triggering agents. Providing that this can be achieved, other key recommendations include avoidance of prophylactic administration of dantrolene; that preoperative management, intraoperative monitoring, and care in the PACU are unaltered by malignant hyperthermia susceptibility; and that malignant hyperthermia patients may be anaesthetised in an outpatient setting.

Management practices for postdural puncture headache in obstetrics: a prospective, international, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural puncture is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia and can cause postdural puncture headache (PDPH). We aimed to describe management practices and outcomes after PDPH treated by epidural blood patch (EBP) or no EBP.

METHODS

Following ethics committee approval, patients who developed PDPH after accidental dural puncture were recruited from participating countries and divided into two groups, those receiving EBP or no EBP. Data registered included patient and procedure characteristics, headache symptoms and intensity, management practices, and complications. Follow-up was at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1001 patients from 24 countries were included, of which 647 (64.6%) received an EBP and 354 (35.4%) did not receive an EBP (no-EBP). Higher initial headache intensity was associated with greater use of EBP, odds ratio 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) per pain intensity unit increase. Headache intensity declined sharply at 4 h after EBP and 127 (19.3%) patients received a second EBP. On average, no or mild headache (numeric rating score≤3) was observed 7 days after diagnosis. Intracranial bleeding was diagnosed in three patients (0.46%), and backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in the EBP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Management practices vary between countries, but EBP was more often used in patients with greater initial headache intensity. EBP reduced headache intensity quickly, but about 20% of patients needed a second EBP. After 7 days, most patients had no or mild headache. Backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in patients receiving an EBP.

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome: an unusual cause of breathlessness in late pregnancy

A pregnant patient with shortness of breath and arterial oxygen desaturation is presented. The primary and tentative initial diagnosis was pulmonary embolism. Her desaturation and dyspnea were aggravated in the upright compared with the supine position. The minimal response to supplemental oxygen suggested right-to-left shunting, which was confirmed by echocardiography. Shunting was minimal in the supine and maximal in the upright position, leading to the diagnosis of platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome. By two weeks postpartum the patient's symptoms had resolved and shunting was undetectable.

[Obstetric Anesthesia During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic - a Brief Overview of Published Recommendations for Action by National and International Specialist Societies and Committees]

The most common human corona viruses cause common colds. But three of these viruses cause more serious, acute diseases; Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS by MERS-CoV), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) by SARS-CoV and COVID-19 by SARS-CoV-2. The current outbreak was classified by the WHO as a "global public health emergency". Despite all efforts to reduce the surgical lists and to cancel or postpone non-time-critical surgical interventions, some surgical and anesthetic interventions outside of intensive care medicine are still necessary and must be performed. This is particularly true for obstetric interventions and neuraxial labor analgesia. Workload in the delivery room is presumably not going to decrease and planned cesarean sections cannot be postponed. In the meantime, the clinical course and outcome of some COVID-19 patients with an existing pregnancy or peripartum courses have been reported. There are already numerous recommendations from national and international bodies regarding the care of such patients. Some of these recommendations will be summarized in this manuscript. The selection of aspects should by no means be seen as a form of prioritization. The general treatment principles in dealing with COVID-19 patients and the recommendations for action in intensive care therapy also apply to pregnant and postpartum patients. In this respect, there are naturally considerable redundancies and only a few aspects apply strictly or exclusively to the cohort of obstetric patients. In summary, at present it must be stated that the general care recommendations that also apply to non-COVID-19 patients are initially valid with regard to obstetric anesthesia. Nevertheless, the special requirements on the part of hygiene and infection protection result in special circumstances that should be taken into account when caring for pregnant patients from an anesthetic point of view. These relate to both medical aspects, but also to a particular extent logistics issues with regard to spatial separation, staffing and material resources.

Cardiac Structure and Function in Morbidly Obese Parturients: An Echocardiographic Study

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of obesity worldwide is a major threat to global health. Cardiac structural and functional changes are well documented for obesity as well as for pregnancy, but there is limited literature on morbidly obese parturients. We hypothesized that there are both cardiac structural and functional differences between morbidly obese pregnant women and pregnant women of normal body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study was performed in 2 referral maternity units in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 3-month period. Forty morbidly obese pregnant women of BMI ≥40 kg·m (group O) were compared to 45 pregnant women of BMI ≤30 kg·m (group N). Cardiac structure and function were assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, according to the recommendations of the British Society of Echocardiography. The 2-sample t-test with unequal variances was used for the comparison of the mean values between the groups.

RESULTS

Acceptable echocardiographic images were obtained in all obese women. Statistical significance was defined as P < .0225 after applying the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing. Mean (standard deviation) mean arterial pressure was higher in group O (91 [8.42] vs 84 [9.49] mm Hg, P < .001). There were no between-group differences in heart rate, stroke volume, or cardiac index (84 [12] vs 79 [13] beats·minute, P = .103; 64.4 [9.7] vs 59.5 [13.5] mL, P = .069; 2551 [474] vs 2729 [623] mL·minute·m, P = .156, for groups O and N, respectively). Stroke volume index was lower, and left ventricular mass was higher in group O (30.14 [4.51] vs 34.25 [7.00] mL·m, P = .003; 152 [24] vs 115 [29] g, P < .001). S' septal was lower in group O (8.43 [1.20] vs 9.25 [1.64] cm·second, P = .012). Considering diastolic function, isovolumetric relaxation time was significantly prolonged in group O (73 [15] vs 61 [15] milliseconds, P < .001). The septal tissue Doppler index E' septal was lower in group O (9.08 [1.69] vs 11.28 [3.18], P < .001). There were no between-group differences in E' average (10.7 [2.3] vs 12.0 [2.7], P = .018, O versus N) or E/E' average (7.85 [1.77] vs 7.27 [1.68], P = .137, O versus N). Right ventricular E'/A' was lower in group O (1.07 [0.47] vs 1.29 [0.32], P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac index did not differ between obese pregnant women and those with normal BMI. Their increased left ventricular mass and lower stroke volume index could indicate a limited adaptive reserve. Obese women had minor decreases in septal left ventricular tissue Doppler velocity, but the E/E' average values did not suggest clinically significant diastolic dysfunction.

A systematic review of phenylephrine vs. noradrenaline for the management of hypotension associated with neuraxial anaesthesia in women undergoing caesarean section

Phenylephrine is recommended for the management of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in women undergoing caesarean section. Noradrenaline, an adrenergic agonist with weak β-adrenergic activity, has been reported to have a more favourable haemodynamic profile than phenylephrine. However, there are concerns that noradrenaline may be associated with a higher risk of fetal acidosis, defined as an umbilical artery pH < 7.20. We performed a systematic review of trials comparing noradrenaline with phenylephrine, concentrating on primary outcomes of fetal acidosis and maternal hypotension. We identified 13 randomised controlled trials including 2002 patients. Heterogeneity among the studies was high, and there were too few data to calculate a pooled effect estimate. Fetal acidosis was assessed in four studies that had a low risk of bias and a low risk of confounding, that is, studies which used a prophylactic vasopressor and where women received the allocated vasopressor only. There were no significant differences between these studies. No significant differences were observed for hypotension. Two trials found a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia when using noradrenaline. Cardiac output was significantly higher after noradrenaline in two of three studies. For other secondary outcomes including nausea, vomiting and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, no studies found significant differences. The evidence so far is too limited to support an advantage of noradrenaline over phenylephrine. Concerns of a deleterious effect of noradrenaline on fetal blood gas status cannot currently be assuaged by the available data from randomised controlled studies.

Patient blood management (PBM) in pregnancy and childbirth: literature review and expert opinion

PURPOSE

Patient blood management [PBM] has been acknowledged and successfully introduced in a wide range of medical specialities, where blood transfusions are an important issue, including anaesthesiology, orthopaedic surgery, cardiac surgery, or traumatology. Although pregnancy and obstetrics have been recognized as a major field of potential haemorrhage and necessity of blood transfusions, there is still little awareness among obstetricians regarding the importance of PBM in this area. This review, therefore, summarizes the importance of PBM in obstetrics and the current evidence on this topic.

METHOD

We review the current literature and summarize the current evidence of PBM in pregnant women and postpartum with a focus on postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) using PubMed as literature source. The literature was reviewed and analysed and conclusions were made by the Swiss PBM in obstetrics working group of experts in a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

PBM comprises a series of measures to maintain an adequate haemoglobin level, improve haemostasis and reduce bleeding, aiming to improve patient outcomes. Despite the fact that the WHO has recommended PBM early 2010, the majority of hospitals are in need of guidelines to apply PBM in daily practice. PBM demonstrated a reduction in morbidity, mortality, and costs for patients undergoing surgery or medical interventions with a high bleeding potential. All pregnant women have a significant risk for PPH. Risk factors do exist; however, 60% of women who experience PPH do not have a pre-existing risk factor. Patient blood management in obstetrics must, therefore, not only be focused on women with identified risk factor for PPH, but on all pregnant women. Due to the risk of PPH, which is inherent to every pregnancy, PBM is of particular importance in obstetrics. Although so far, there is no clear guideline how to implement PBM in obstetrics, there are some simple, effective measures to reduce anaemia and the necessity of transfusions in women giving birth and thereby improving clinical outcome and avoiding complications.

CONCLUSION

PBM in obstetrics is based on three main pillars: diagnostic and/or therapeutic interventions during pregnancy, during delivery and in the postpartum phase. These three main pillars should be kept in mind by all professionals taking care of pregnant women, including obstetricians, general practitioners, midwifes, and anaesthesiologists, to improve pregnancy outcome and optimize resources.

Einleitung von nicht nüchternen Patienten am Beispiel von Schwangeren und Kindern

Die klassische Technik der Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) ist eine fundamentale Form der Anästhesieeinleitung bei nicht nüchternen Patienten zur Verhinderung der Aspiration von Mageninhalt. Schwangere und Kinder sind aufgrund ihrer Hypoxiegefährdung eine besondere Herausforderung; das klassische RSI-Konzept „Induktion – Apnoe – (Krikoiddruck –) Intubation“ muss bei ihnen zugunsten einer kontrollierten Technik mit Erhalt der Oxygenierung modifiziert werden.

Maligne Hyperthermie: Diagnostik konkret

Sowohl in der präoperativen Visite als auch bei intraoperativ verdächtigen Zwischenfällen kann sich die Frage nach einer Abklärung auf maligne Hyperthermie ergeben. Heute stehen mit molekulargenetischen Methoden und mit der Muskelbiopsie und Kontrakturtest 2 grundsätzliche verschiedene Testmethoden zur Verfügung. Beide diagnostischen Methoden haben Vor- und Nachteile – und ergänzen sich.

Generalisability of randomised trials of the programmed intermittent epidural bolus technique for maintenance of labour analgesia: a prospective single centre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Several randomised controlled trials show that maintenance of labour epidural analgesia with programmed intermittent epidural bolus reduces the maternal motor block compared with maintenance with a continuous infusion. However, these trials were usually restricted to healthy nulliparous parturients. To assess the generalisability of these randomised controlled trials to 'real-world' conditions, we compared maternal motor function (modified Bromage score) over time between healthy nulliparous and parous women using routinely collected quality-control data.

METHODS

After ethical approval, all parturients receiving programmed intermittent epidural bolus labour analgesia between June 2013 and October 2014 were included in this prospective cohort study. Bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 2 μg ml^-1 was used allowing for patient-controlled bolus every 20 min. The maternal motor function (primary outcome) was regularly assessed from insertion of the epidural catheter until delivery.

RESULTS

Of the 839 parturients included, 553 (66%) were nulliparous and 286 (34%) were parous. The parous women had a shorter median duration of epidural analgesia (3 h 59 min vs 5 h 45 min) and a higher incidence of spontaneous delivery (66% vs 37%). The probability of being in a certain Bromage category at birth was similar in nulliparous and parous women in a general additive model adjusting for duration of epidural analgesia, number of rescue top-ups, and number of catheter manipulations (cumulative odds ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.41). Parous women required a higher time-weighted number and volume of rescue top-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the randomised controlled trials on a reduced motor block with programmed intermittent epidural bolus seem generalisable to parturients typically not included in these trials.

Adherence to the WHO surgical safety checklist: an observational study in a Swiss academic center

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is used globally to ensure patient safety during surgery. Two years after its implementation in the University Hospital Basel's operating rooms, adherence to the protocol was evaluated.

Methods

This mixed method observational study took place in the surgical department of the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland from April to August 2017. Data collection was via individual structured interviews with selected OR team members regarding checklist adherence and on-site non-participant observations of Team Time Out and Team Sign Out sequences in the OR. Data were subjected to thematic analysis and descriptive statistics compiled.

Results

Comprehensive local expert interviews indicated that individual, procedural and contextual variables influenced the application of the checklist. Facilitating factors included well-informed specialists who advocated the use of the Checklist, as well as teams focused on the checklist's intended process and on its content. In contrast, factors such as staff insecurity, a generally negative attitude towards the checklist, a lack of teamwork, and hesitance to complete the checklist, hindered its implementation.The checklist's application was evaluated in 104 on-site observations comprising of 72 Team Time Out (TTO) and 32 Team Sign Out (TSO) sections. Adherence to the protocol ranged between 96 and 100% in TTO and 22% in TSO respectively. Lack of implementation of the TSO was mainly due to the absence of one of the key OR team members, who were busy with other tasks or no longer present in the operating room.

Conclusion

The study illustrates factors, which foster and hinder consistent application of the WHO surgical safety checklist namely individual, procedural and contextual. It also demonstrates that the TTO was consistently and correctly applied, while the unavailability of key OR team members at sign-out time was the most common reason for omission or incomplete use of the TSO.

Efficacy and safety of carbetocin given as an intravenous bolus compared with short infusion for Caesarean section - double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Background

Carbetocin is a synthetic oxytocin-analogue, which should be administered as bolus according to manufacturer's recommendations. A higher speed of oxytocin administration leads to increased cardiovascular side-effects. It is unclear whether carbetocin administration as short infusion has the same efficacy on uterine tone compared with bolus administration and whether haemodynamic parameters differ.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, women undergoing planned or unplanned Caesarean section (CS) under regional anaesthesia received a bolus and a short infusion, only one of which contained carbetocin 100 mcg (double dummy). Obstetricians quantified uterine tone two, three, five and 10 min after cord-clamping by manual palpation using a linear analogue scale from 0 to 100. We evaluated whether the lower limit of the 95% CI of the difference in maximum uterine tone within the first five min after cord-clamping did not include the pre-specified non-inferiority limit of -10.

Results

Between December 2014 and November 2015, 69 patients were randomized to receive carbetocin as bolus and 71 to receive it as short infusion. Maximal uterine tone was 89 in the bolus and 88 in the short infusion group (mean difference -1.3, 95% CI -5.7 to 3.1). Bp, calculated blood loss, use of additional uterotonics, and side-effects were comparable.

Conclusions

Administration of carbetocin as short infusion does not compromise uterine tone and has similar cardiovascular side-effects as a slow i.v. bolus. In accordance with current recommendations for oxytocin, carbetocin can safely be administered as short -infusion during planned or unplanned CS.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221531 and www.kofam.ch SNCTP000001197.

[Update in Obstetric Anesthesia - Tried and Trusted Methods, Controversies and New Perspectives]

Since 1975, a plethora of lectures within the context of annual meetings relevant for the clinical care has been summarized in "what's new in obstetric anesthesia" by the society for Obstetric anesthesia and Perinatology which can be recommended to everyone interested in anaesthesiology in the delivery room. After the death of Gerard W. Ostheimer, Professor of Anaesthesiology at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, it became renamed the Gerard W. Ostheimer "what's new in obstetric anesthesia" lecture to honor his contributions to regional anesthesia and obstetric anaesthesia. Each year the event held by selected professional representatives and their imprint in leading anesthesia journals give insight into a critical appraisal of recent literature and the possible consequences for - but not only - the anaesthetic delivery room practice.A similar event has been established in Germany for more than 16 years (first event on April 1, 2000, most recently held on February 27, 2016, in Munich): the obstetrical anesthesia symposium of the academic working group "regional anesthesia and obstetrical anesthesia" [1], [2]."Evergreens" or "hot topics" with regard to anaesthesiological delivery room practice are presented and discussed regularly. The lectures often reveal the subtle change of the issues being debated much earlier than traditional textbook chapters do. This manuscript summarizes important findings from the last symposium held in 2016. Part I focuses on relevant causes for maternal morbidity and mortality as well as preventive measures, pregnancy in obese patients and sepsis in obstetric anaesthesia. Part II addresses established standards and new perspectives in the direct obstetric setting regarding epidural analgesia, post-dural puncture headache, anaesthesia and analgesia during and after caesarean section, haemodynamic monitoring during cesarean section and postpartum haemorrhage.

[Update in Obstetric Anesthesia: Tried and Trusted Methods, Controversies and New Perspectives - Part 1]

Since 1975, a plethora of lectures within the context of annual meetings relevant for the clinical care has been summarized in "what's new in obstetric anesthesia" by the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology which can be recommended to everyone interested in anaesthesiology in the delivery room. After the death of Gerard W. Ostheimer, Professor of Anaesthesiology at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, it became renamed the Gerard W. Ostheimer "what's new in obstetric anesthesia" lecture to honor his contributions to regional anesthesia and obstetric anaesthesia. Each year the event held by selected professional representatives and their imprint in leading anesthesia journals give insight into a critical appraisal of recent literature and the possible consequences for - but not only - the anaesthetic delivery room practice.A similar event has been established in Germany for more than 16 years: the obstetrical anesthesia symposium of the academic working group "regional anesthesia and obstetrical anesthesia" 1, 2."Evergreens" or "hot topics" with regard to anaesthesiological delivery room practice are presented and discussed regularly. The lectures often reveal the subtle change of the issues being debated much earlier than traditional textbook chapters do. This manuscript summarizes important findings from the last symposium held in 2016. Part I focuses on relevant causes for maternal morbidity and mortality as well as preventive measures, pregnancy in obese patients and sepsis in obstetric anaesthesia. Part II addresses established standards and new perspectives in the direct obstetric setting regarding epidural analgesia, post-dural puncture headache, anaesthesia and analgesia during and after caesarean section, haemodynamic monitoring during cesarean section and postpartum haemorrhage.

Geburtshilfe: hypertensive Erkrankungen in der Schwangerschaft

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are one of the most common complications in pregnancy. They are associated with a high maternal, fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. 99 % of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries, but we should not forget that even in highly developed countries mothers still die from the complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. This term encompasses chronic hypertension as well as pregnancy specific disorders such as gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. The physiological changes of pregnancy can make the differentiation between benign symptoms of pregnancy and life threatening conditions challenging. In order to provide optimal care for these women, an interdisciplinary approach between all members of the obstetric care team is crucial. The current review article discusses new advances in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Resequencing array for gene variant detection in malignant hyperthermia and butyrylcholinestherase deficiency

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) and butyrylcholinestherase (BCHE) deficiency are two relevant pharmacogenetic disorders in anesthetic practice linked with sequence variants, the former in the RyR1 and CACNA1S genes, the latter in the BCHE gene. Genotyping for known pathogenic variants in these genes is useful to help identify susceptible individuals, and others may exist but remain unknown, because full-length sequence of these genes is, in general, not investigated. To facilitate this task, we developed a resequencing DNA array, the perioperative patient safety (POPS) array, to be able to screen the entire coding sequences of the RyR1, CACNA1S and BCHE genes. MH-susceptible individuals (n = 121) identified with the in vitro contracture test, the standard diagnostic tool for MH susceptibility, were genotyped with the arrays. Compared with capillary sequencing, call rates with the arrays could achieve 100% at maximal sensitivity, although to reduce false positive rates, sensitivity was adjusted to 0.85, 0.87 and 0.66 for RyR1, CACNA1S and BCHE respectively, with overall base call specificity exceeding 99%. Detection of 29 predetermined RyR1 variants in 44 individuals was successful in 97% of the cases, among them all 16 variants of established diagnostic value. In a trial application of the arrays, 21 MH-susceptible subjects with no known RyR1 or CACNA1S variants were screened, resulting in the discovery of new variants, all confirmed by capillary sequencing. In conclusion, arrays offer an efficient high-throughput alternative for diagnostic genotyping of candidate genes affecting MH susceptibility, BCHE deficiency and other neuromuscular disorders, simultaneously enabling a comprehensive search for rare variants in these genes.