Management practices for postdural puncture headache in obstetrics: a prospective, international, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural puncture is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia and can cause postdural puncture headache (PDPH). We aimed to describe management practices and outcomes after PDPH treated by epidural blood patch (EBP) or no EBP.

METHODS

Following ethics committee approval, patients who developed PDPH after accidental dural puncture were recruited from participating countries and divided into two groups, those receiving EBP or no EBP. Data registered included patient and procedure characteristics, headache symptoms and intensity, management practices, and complications. Follow-up was at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1001 patients from 24 countries were included, of which 647 (64.6%) received an EBP and 354 (35.4%) did not receive an EBP (no-EBP). Higher initial headache intensity was associated with greater use of EBP, odds ratio 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) per pain intensity unit increase. Headache intensity declined sharply at 4 h after EBP and 127 (19.3%) patients received a second EBP. On average, no or mild headache (numeric rating score≤3) was observed 7 days after diagnosis. Intracranial bleeding was diagnosed in three patients (0.46%), and backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in the EBP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Management practices vary between countries, but EBP was more often used in patients with greater initial headache intensity. EBP reduced headache intensity quickly, but about 20% of patients needed a second EBP. After 7 days, most patients had no or mild headache. Backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in patients receiving an EBP.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Systemic Infection in Deceased Donors

BACKGROUND

Organ donation shortage is the primary barrier to all organ transplantations.Infectious disease transmission through transplantation is considered controversial for organ retrieval. Donors with bacteremia and sepsis are considered controversial for organ retrieval due to potential transmission of an infectious agent to the recipient.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of bacterial culture of the donor's blood from peripheral venous or central venous catheter, urine, and bronchial aspiration from the organ donation registries of 102 potential donors from the Ministry of Health and Tissue Transplant Coordination Center of Istanbul Region in 2015.

RESULTS

Of the 102 deceased donors included in the analysis, 24 (23.5%) had infection. The most common sites of infection were the bloodstream (41.6%) and the respiratory system (37.5%). The most common isolated pathogens of the bacterial cultures were Gram-positive bacteria (21), Gram-negative microorganisms (14), and Candida (1). The significant risk factor for infection was duration of stay at the intensive care unit (median: 5 day; 25-75%: 3-5 day) (odds ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.12; P < .05). The presence of infection in the donor accounted for a significant part of the reasons why the organs were not accepted for transplantation (kidneys 9%, liver 4%, heart 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that deceased donors with prolonged stays in the intensive care unit have an increased risk for developing nosocomial infections; so there is a need for establishing and enforcing the prevention and control of infection in possible donors.

Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management Following Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum

OBJECTIVE

The Nuss procedure is a preferred technique for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), but it is associated with significant postoperative pain. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an ultrasound-guided bilateral serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) for relieving acute pain from MIRPE.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.

PARTICIPANTS

All participants were scheduled for MIRPE.

INTERVENTIONS

This study was conducted from November 2017 to May 2018. Postoperative pain control was achieved with bilateral SAPB done after induction of anesthesia and IV PCA in 50 patient (SABP group) and with only IV PCA in 45 patients (Control group). SAPB was achieved, targeting the interfascial plane between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles, with a single injection of 30 mL (20 mL if patient weighed < 40 kg) of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5% lidocaine into each side. Pain scores were recorded for 24 h.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients in the Control group had a higher demand (mean difference, 61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 30.5-136; P < 0.0001) and delivery dose (mean difference, 25; 95% CI 15-41.5 P = 0.001) during the first postoperative 24 h. SAPB did not affect the median (interquartile range) length of hospital stay: 5 (5-7) days vs. 5 (4-6) days, (P =0.085).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral single-injection SAPB in patients undergoing MIRPE decreases pain and opioid consumption during the early postoperative period.

The Effect of Standardized Interviews on Organ Donation

OBJECTIVES

Organ donation is the most important stage for organ transplant. Studies reveal that attitudes of families of brain-dead patients toward donation play a significant role in their decision. We hypothesized that supporting family awareness about the meaning of organ donation, including saving lives while losing a loved one, combined with being informed about brain death and the donation process must be maintained by intensive care unit physicians through standardized interviews and questionnaires to increase the donation rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the final decisions of families of 52 brain-dead donors treated at our institution between 2014 and 2017. Data underwent descriptive analyses. The standard interview content was generated after literature search results were reviewed by the authors. Previously, we examined the impact of standardized interviews done by intensive care unit physicians with relatives of potential brain-dead donors regarding decisions to donate or reasons for refusing organ donation. After termination of that study, interviews were done according to the intensivist's orientation, resulting in significantly decreased donation rates. Standardized interviews were then started again, resulting in increased donation rates.

RESULTS

Of 17 families who participated in standardized interviews, 5 families (29.4%) agreed to donate organs of their brain-dead relatives. In the other group of families, intensivists governed informing the families of donation without standardized interviews. In this group of 35 families, 5 families (14.3%) approved organ donation. The decision regarding whether to agree to organ donation was statistically different between the 2 family groups (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting a standard interview between relatives of brain-dead donors and the intensivists, facilitating visits between relatives and the brain-dead patients, and informing relatives about the donation process resulted in an increased rate of organ donation compared with routine protocols.

Effect of Interviews Done by Intensive Care Physicians on Organ Donation

In this study, we examined the correspondence between intensive care unit physicians and the relatives of potential brain-dead donors regarding the decision to donate or the reasons for refusing organ donation. A total of 12 consecutive cases of potential brain-dead patients treated in intensive care units of Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital in 2013 were evaluated. For each of the cases, the Potential Donor Questionnaire, and Family Notification, Brain Death Criteria Fulfilment and Organ Donation Conversation Questionnaires were used to collect the required data. Statistically, descriptive analyses were performed. We concluded that honestly, regularly, and sufficiently informed relatives of the potential brain-dead donor more readily donate organs, with a positive contribution from the intensive care physician.