Endothelin ETA receptor blockade potentiates morphine analgesia but does not affect gastrointestinal transit in mice

Inhibition of endothelin A receptor by a novel, selective receptor antagonist enhances morphine-induced analgesia: Possible functional interaction of dimerized endothelin A and μ-opioid receptors

BACKGROUND

The misuse of opioids has led to an epidemic in recent times. The endothelin A receptor (ETAR) has recently attracted attention as a novel therapeutic target to enhance opioid analgesia. We hypothesized that endothelin A receptors may affect pain mechanisms by heterodimerization with μ opioid receptors. We examined the mechanisms of ETAR-mediated pain and the potential therapeutic effects of an ETAR antagonist, Compound-E, as an agent for analgesia.

METHODS

Real-time in vitro effect of Compound-E on morphine response was assessed in HEK293 cells expressing both endothelin A and μ opioid receptors through CellKey™ and cADDis cAMP assays. Endothelin A/μ opioid receptor dimerization was assessed by immunoprecipitation and live cell imaging. The in vivo effect of Compound-E was evaluated using a morphine analgesia mouse model that observed escape response behavior, body temperature, and locomotor activity.

RESULTS

In CellKey™ and cAMP assays, pretreatment of cells with endothelin-1 attenuated morphine-induced responses. These responses were improved by Compound-E, but not by BQ-123 nor by bosentan, an ETAR and endothelin B receptor antagonist. Dimerization of ETARs and μ opioid receptors was confirmed by Western blot and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in live cells. In vivo, Compound-E potentiated and prolonged the analgesic effects of morphine, enhanced hypothermia, and increased locomotor activity compared to morphine alone.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that attenuation by endothelin-1 of morphine analgesia may be caused by dimerization of Endothelin A/μ opioid receptors. The novel ETAR antagonist Compound-E could be an effective adjunct to reduce opioid use.

The protective effect of endothelin receptor antagonists against surgically induced impairment of gastrointestinal motility in rats

Endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists: BQ-123 (ET_A), BQ-788 (ET_B), tezosentan (dual ET receptor antagonist) protect against the development of postoperative ileus (POI) evoked by ischemia-reperfusion (I/R). The current experiments explored whether ET antagonists prevent the occurrence of POI evoked by surgical gut manipulation. Intestinal transit was assessed by measuring the rate of dye migration subsequent to skin incision (SI), laparotomy (L), or laparotomy and surgical gut handling (L+M) in diethyl ether anaesthesized rats (E). Experimental animals were randomly sub-divided into two groups depending on the time of recovery following surgery: viz. either 2 or 24 h (early or late phase POI). E and SI did not affect the gastrointestinal (GI) transit. In contrast, L and L+M significantly reduced GI motility in comparison to untreated group (UN). Tezosentan (10 mg/kg), BQ-123 and BQ-788 (1 mg/kg) protected against development of L+M evoked inhibition of intestinal motility in the course of late phase, but not early phase POI. Furthermore, tezosentan alleviated the decrease in the contractile response of the longitudinal jejunal smooth muscle strips to carbachol in vitro induced by L+M. The serum ET(1–21) concentration was not increased in either the early or the late phase POI groups after surgery compared to control animals. This study indicates that delay in the intestinal transit in late phase of surgically induced POI involves an ET-dependent mechanism.

Evidence for the endothelin system as an emerging therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic pain

Many people worldwide suffer from pain and a portion of these sufferers are diagnosed with a chronic pain condition. The management of chronic pain continues to be a challenge, and despite taking prescribed medication for pain, patients continue to have pain of moderate severity. Current pain therapies are often inadequate, with side effects that limit medication adherence. There is a need to identify novel therapeutic targets for the management of chronic pain. One potential candidate for the treatment of chronic pain is therapies aimed at modulating the vasoactive peptide endothelin-1. In addition to vasoactive properties, endothelin-1 has been implicated in pain transmission in both humans and animal models of nociception. Endothelin-1 directly activates nociceptors and potentiates the effect of other algogens, including capsaicin, formalin, and arachidonic acid. In addition, endothelin-1 has been shown to be involved in inflammatory pain, cancer pain, neuropathic pain, diabetic neuropathy, and pain associated with sickle cell disease. Therefore, endothelin-1 may prove a novel therapeutic target for the relief of many types of chronic pain.

The primary vascular dysregulation syndrome: implications for eye diseases

Vascular dysregulation refers to the regulation of blood flow that is not adapted to the needs of the respective tissue. We distinguish primary vascular dysregulation (PVD, formerly called vasospastic syndrome) and secondary vascular dysregulation (SVD). Subjects with PVD tend to have cold extremities, low blood pressure, reduced feeling of thirst, altered drug sensitivity, increased pain sensitivity, prolonged sleep onset time, altered gene expression in the lymphocytes, signs of oxidative stress, slightly increased endothelin-1 plasma level, low body mass index and often diffuse and fluctuating visual field defects. Coldness, emotional or mechanical stress and starving can provoke symptoms. Virtually all organs, particularly the eye, can be involved. In subjects with PVD, retinal vessels are stiffer and more irregular, and both neurovascular coupling and autoregulation capacity are reduced while retinal venous pressure is often increased. Subjects with PVD have increased risk for normal-tension glaucoma, optic nerve compartment syndrome, central serous choroidopathy, Susac syndrome, retinal artery and vein occlusions and anterior ischaemic neuropathy without atherosclerosis. Further characteristics are their weaker blood–brain and blood-retinal barriers and the higher prevalence of optic disc haemorrhages and activated astrocytes. Subjects with PVD tend to suffer more often from tinnitus, muscle cramps, migraine with aura and silent myocardial ischaemic and are at greater risk for altitude sickness. While the main cause of vascular dysregulation is vascular endotheliopathy, dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system is also involved. In contrast, SVD occurs in the context of other diseases such as multiple sclerosis, retrobulbar neuritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia and giant cell arteritis. Taking into consideration the high prevalence of PVD in the population and potentially linked pathologies, in the current article, the authors provide recommendations on how to effectively promote the field in order to create innovative diagnostic tools to predict the pathology and develop more efficient treatment approaches tailored to the person.

Influence of fed-fasted state on intestinal PEPT1 expression and in vivo pharmacokinetics of glycylsarcosine in wild-type and Pept1 knockout mice

PURPOSE

To determine if fasting would affect the intestinal expression and in vivo functional activity of PEPT1 as determined after oral dosing of the dipeptide glycylsarcosine (GlySar).

METHODS

Systemic exposure and tissue distribution studies were performed in wild-type and Pept1 knockout mice, under fed and fasted conditions, following both intravenous and oral doses of [(14)C]GlySar at 5 nmol/g body weight. Intestinal PEPT1 expression was evaluated by real-time PCR and immunoblot analyses.

RESULTS

We found that expression of PEPT1 protein in the small intestine was increased ~2-fold in wild-type mice during fasted as compared to fed conditions. In agreement, systemic exposure and peak plasma concentrations of orally administered GlySar were 40 and 65% greater, respectively, in wild-type mice during fasted vs. fed state. No significant differences were observed between fed and fasted animals during PEPT1 ablation. Tissue distribution of GlySar was unchanged after oral dosing for all four treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As little as 16 h of fasting can cause significant upregulation of PEPT1 protein expression in the small intestine, which then translates into a significant increase in in vivo oral absorption of GlySar.

Study of adrenergic, imidazoline, and endothelin receptors in clonidine-, morphine-, and oxycodone-induced changes in rat body temperature

OBJECTIVES

The potentiation of morphine or oxycodone analgesia by endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonists and imidazoline/α(2)-adrenergic agonists is well documented. However, the effect of morphine or oxycodone in combination with an ET(A) receptor antagonist or an imidazoline/α(2) adrenergic agonist on body temperature is not known. The present study was carried out to study the role of ET(A) and imidazoline/α(2) adrenergic receptors in body temperature effects of morphine, oxycodone, and clonidine in rats.

METHODS

Body temperature was determined in male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with morphine, oxycodone, or clonidine. Yohimbine, idazoxan, and BMS182874 were used to determine the involvement of α(2)-adrenergic, imidazoline, and ET(A) receptors, respectively.

KEY FINDINGS

Morphine and oxycodone produced hyperthermia which was not affected by α(2)-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine, imidazoline/α(2)-adrenergic antagonist idazoxan, or ET(A) receptor antagonist BMS182874. Clonidine alone produced hypothermia that was comparable to the hypothermia observed with clonidine plus morphine or oxycodone. The hypothermic effect of clonidine was blocked by idazoxan and yohimbine. The blockade by idazoxan was more pronounced compared to yohimbine. Clonidine hypothermia was not affected by BMS182874.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report demonstrating that ET(A) receptors do not influence morphine- and oxycodone- induced hyperthermia or clonidine-induced hypothermia. Imidazoline receptors and α(2)-adrenergic receptors are involved in clonidine-induced hypothermia, but not in morphine- and oxycodone-induced hyperthermia.

Involvement of imidazoline and opioid receptors in the enhancement of clonidine-induced analgesia by sulfisoxazole

Clonidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, has been demonstrated to produce significant analgesia and potentiate morphine analgesia. Endothelin (ETA) receptor antagonists have also been found to potentiate the antinociceptive response to morphine. Clonidine and ET have been reported to have cardiovascular interactions involving the sympathetic nervous system, but it is not known whether ETA receptor antagonist affects clonidine analgesia. This study examined the influence of sulfisoxazole (ETA receptor antagonist) on clonidine analgesia. Male Swiss Webster mice were used to determine antinociceptive response of drugs by measuring tail-flick latency. The effect of clonidine (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) alone or in combination with sulfisoxazole (25, 75, and 225 mg/kg, p.o.) on analgesia and body temperature was determined. Clonidine produced a dose-dependent analgesia and hypothermia. Sulfisoxazole (25, 75, and 225 mg/kg), when administered with clonidine (0.3 mg/kg), significantly potentiated (31% increase in area under the curve (AUC)) the analgesic effect of clonidine. Yohimbine (α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist) did not affect analgesic effect of clonidine plus sulfisoxazole. Idazoxan (I1-imidazoline and α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist) reduced (47% decrease in AUC) the analgesic effect of clonidine plus sulfisoxazole. Treatment with naloxone reduced (46% decrease in AUC) the analgesic effect of clonidine plus sulfisoxazole. The effect of another ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874 (2, 10, and 50 µg, i.c.v.) was studied, and it was found that the dose of 10 µg significantly potentiated (26% increase in AUC) the analgesic effect of clonidine. These results indicate that sulfisoxazole, an ETA receptor antagonist, potentiates the analgesic effect of clonidine, which could be mediated through I1-imidazoline receptors and opioid receptors.

Endothelin receptors and pain

The endogenous endothelin (ET) peptides participate in a remarkable variety of pain-relatedprocesses. Pain that is elevated by inflammation, by skin incision, by cancer, during a Sickle Cell Disease crisis and by treatments that mimic neuropathic and inflammatory pain and are all reduced by local administration of antagonists of endothelin receptors. Many effects of endogenously released endothelin are simulated by acute, local subcutaneous administration of endothelin, which at very high concentrations causes pain and at lower concentrations sensitizes the nocifensive reactions to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli.

PERSPECTIVE

In this paper we review the biochemistry, second messenger pathways and hetero-receptor coupling that are activated by ET receptors, the cellular physiological responses to ET receptor activation, and the contribution to pain of such mechanisms occurring in the periphery and the CNS. Our goal is to frame the subject of endothelin and pain for a broad readership, and to present the generally accepted as well as the disputed concepts, including important unanswered questions.

Tumor-evoked sensitization of C nociceptors: a role for endothelin

Primary and metastatic cancers that effect bone are frequently associated with pain. Sensitization of primary afferent C nociceptors innervating tissue near the tumor likely contributes to the chronic pain and hyperalgesia accompanying this condition. This study focused on the role of the endogenous peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) as a potential peripheral algogen implicated in the process of cancer pain. Electrophysiological response properties, including ongoing activity and responses evoked by heat stimuli, of C nociceptors were recorded in vivo from the tibial nerve in anesthetized control mice and mice exhibiting mechanical hyperalgesia following implantation of fibrosarcoma cells into and around the calcaneus bone. ET-1 (100 microM) injected into the receptive fields of C nociceptors innervating the plantar surface of the hind paw evoked an increase in ongoing activity in both control and tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (3 mM), attenuated tumor-evoked ongoing activity in tumor-bearing mice. Whereas ET-1 produced sensitization of C nociceptors to heat stimuli in control mice, C nociceptors in tumor-bearing mice were sensitized to heat, and their responses were not further increased by ET-1. Importantly, administration of BQ-123 attenuated tumor-evoked sensitization of C nociceptors to heat. We conclude that ET-1 at the tumor site contributes to tumor-evoked excitation and sensitization of C nociceptors through an ETA receptor mediated mechanism.

Endothelin-1-induced pain and hyperalgesia: a review of pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and future therapeutic options

Pain in patients with metastatic cancer contributes to increased suffering in those already burdened by their advancing illness. The causes of this pain are unknown, but are likely to involve the action of tumour-associated mediators and their receptors. In recent years, several chemical mediators have increasingly come to the forefront in the pathophysiology of cancer pain. One such mediator, endothelin-1 (ET-1), is a peptide of 21 amino acids that was initially shown to be a potent vasoconstrictor. Extensive research has revealed that members of the ET family are indeed produced by several epithelial cancerous tumours, in which they act as autocrine and/or paracrine growth factors. Several preclinical and clinical studies of various malignancies have suggested that the ET axis may represent an interesting contributor to tumour progression. In addition, evidence is accumulating to suggest that ET-1 may contribute to pain states both in humans and in other animals. ET-1 both stimulates nociceptors and sensitises them to painful stimuli. Selective stimulation of ET receptors has been implicated as a cause of inflammatory, neuropathic and tumoural pain. ET-1-induced pain-related behaviour seems to be mediated either solely by one receptor type or via both endothelin-A receptors (ETAR) and endothelin-B receptors (ETBR). Whereas stimulation of ETAR on nociceptors always elicits a pain response, stimulation of ETBR may cause analgesia or elicit a pain response, depending on the conditions. The administration of ETAR antagonists in the receptive fields of these nociceptors has been shown to ameliorate pain-related behaviours in animals, as well as in some patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer. The identification of tumour-associated mediators that might directly or indirectly cause pain in patients with metastatic disease, such as ET-1, should lead to improved, targeted analgesia for patients with advanced cancer. In this review, we will describe the current status of the role of ET-1 in different types of painful syndromes, with special emphasis on its role in the pathophysiology of cancer pain. Finally, potential new treatment options that are based on the role of the ET axis in the pathophysiology of cancer are elaborated.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006

This paper is the 29th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2006 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurological disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).