Incidental findings in healthy control research subjects using whole-body MRI

Incidental findings are frequent in shoulder CT and MRI scans and increase with age

Objectives

CT and MRI scans of the shoulder can lead to the identification of incidental findings (IF), which can have a major impact on the further treatment of the patient. The aim of this retrospective study was to record the prevalence of IF, incidentalomas (IT) and malignant IT for CT and MRI examinations of the shoulder and to investigate the effect of patient characteristics on the statistical occurrence of IF, IT and malignant IT.

Materials and methods

A total of 903 shoulder examinations (415 CT, 488 MRI) were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of IF, subsequently categorized (harmless IF, IT requiring clarification, malignant IT) and analyzed regarding patient characteristics. The statistical analysis was carried out using independent t- and chi-square tests. A significance level of p < 0.05 was set.

Results

Among the 903 patients evaluated (436 female, 467 male), 153 (16.9%) patients experienced IF (harmless IF: 101 (11.2%) patients, IT: 94 (10.4%), malignant IT: 4 (0.4%). The average age of the patients without IF and IT was significantly lower compared to the patients with IF and IT (p < 0.001). While IF occurred in 31.1% of the CT, IF was only detected in 4.9% of the MRI (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

IF have a high prevalence (16.9%), especially in CT examinations of the shoulder, which increases with age. The exact detection and initiation of appropriate therapy is of great clinical importance, as early detection of life-threatening diseases enables more effective treatment and a potential gain in health and lifespan.

Radiographic assessment of incidental bone lesions of the proximal humerus: a prevalence study

BACKGROUND

An increased prevalence of benign lesions has been associated with the increased use of radiological tools in orthopedic practice.

PURPOSE

To investigate the inter-observer reliability of the radiographic detection of lesions on the proximal humerus between different observers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

X-ray radiological examinations of 17,243 patients were performed by an orthopedic surgeon to assess the presence of proximal humeral bone lesions. After this initial screening, 201 patients with lesions were identified and these 201 scans were assessed by three different physicians: an orthopedic oncologist, an orthopedic surgeon, and a musculoskeletal radiologist. Of the 201 patients with lesions, 80 had magnetic resonance imaging in addition to X-rays and were assessed. The diagnosis of the lesions was determined by each participant according to their radiological appearance to assess inter-observer reliability.

RESULTS

The prevalence of proximal humeral lesions was determined by the orthopedic surgeon to be 1.165% (201 of 17,243 patients). In 201 patients with a lesion, the mean age was 48 ± 17 years (range = 18-91 years). According to the assessments of the orthopedic oncologist, orthopedic surgeon, and musculoskeletal radiologist, the most common bone lesion identified was enostosis, with prevalence percentages of 53.7%, 59.7%, and 64.7%, respectively. A noteworthy consensus exists in the collective diagnosis of bone lesions among the three investigators, demonstrated by a substantial agreement with Fleiss' κ at 0.74 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was remarkable agreement between the three investigators on the collective diagnosis of bone lesions. Enostosis was the most common bone lesion at the proximal humerus in our series.

Applying ONCO-RADS to whole-body MRI cancer screening in a retrospective cohort of asymptomatic individuals

BACKGROUND

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has emerged as a valuable tool for cancer detection. This study evaluated the prevalence rates of cancer in asymptomatic individuals undergoing WB-MRI according to the Oncologically Relevant Findings Reporting and Data System (ONCO-RADS) classifications in order to assess the reliability of the classification method.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 2064 asymptomatic individuals who participated in a WB-MRI cancer screening program between 2017 and 2022. WB-MRI was acquired on a 3-T system with a standard protocol, including regional multisequence and gadolinium-based contrast agent-enhanced oncologic MRI. Results of further examinations, including additional imaging and histopathology examinations, performed at our institute were used to validate the WB-MRI findings. Two radiologists blinded to the clinical outcome classified the WB-MRI findings according to the ONCO-RADS categories as follows: 1 (normal), 2 (benign finding highly likely), 3 (benign finding likely), 4 (malignant finding likely), and 5 (malignant finding highly likely). Firth logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the associations between participant characteristics and findings of ONCO-RADS category ≥ 4.

RESULTS

Of the 2064 participants with median age of 55 years, 1120 (54.3%) were men, 43 (2.1%) had findings of ONCO-RADS category ≥ 4, and 24 (1.2%) had confirmed cancer. The cancer prevalence rates were 0.1%, 5.4%, 42.9%, and 75% for ONCO-RADS categories 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. In the multivariable model, older age (OR: 1.035, p = 0.029) and history of hypertension (OR: 2.051, p = 0.026), hepatitis B carrier (OR: 2.584, p = 0.013), or prior surgery (OR: 3.787, p < 0.001) were independently associated with the findings for ONCO-RADS category ≥ 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The ONCO-RADS categories for cancer risk stratification were validated and found to be positively correlated with cancer risk. The application of ONCO-RADS facilitates risk-based management after WB-MRI for cancer screening.

[Geriatric ultrasound : Prospective evaluation of ultrasound as extended screening in acute geriatric patients]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate ultrasound as a routinely used procedure and extended physical examination in geriatric patients in acute care.

METHODS

Prospective study of 86 patients using ultrasound as a screening examination (abdomen, basal sections of the thorax, thyroid glands) under comparative use of a hand-held ultrasound device (HHUSD) and a high-end ultrasound (HEUS = gold standard).

RESULTS

In 20/86 (23.2%) clinically relevant findings with therapeutic consequences were found (pleural effusion, urinary retention, choledocholithiasis metatases, colon tumor). In 22/86 (25.6%) patients, additional questions existed besides the screening indication: tumor search (9.3%), anemia (5.8%), liver value elevation (5.8%), dyspnea (5.8%), splenic pathologies (2.3%), weight loss (1.2%), infectious focus (1.2%), diarrhea (1.2%), intra-abdominal hematoma (1.1%), abdominal aortic aneurysm (1.2%). The most common sonographic findings included: cholecystolithiasis (32.6%); right pleural effusion (31.4%), thyroid nodules (30.2%), renal cysts (27.9%), and fatty liver (26.7%). There were significant differences in sizing between HHUSD and HEUS (kidneys, pancreatic corpus and pancreatic caudal diameters, portal vein, left hepatic vein) without diagnostic relevance.

CONCLUSION

The extended screening by ultrasound provided important answers to classical questions in geriatrics (e.g. urinary retention, volume deficiency/pleural effusion) in many cases. The new findings had therapeutic consequences in one fifth of the patients. The HHUSD can be used in screening.

Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Musculoskeletal Findings on MRI and CT

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspeciality and general radiologists tasked with either adapting American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to meet the needs of Canadian radiologists or authoring new guidelines where appropriate. In this case, entirely new guidelines to deal with incidental musculoskeletal findings that may be encountered on thoracoabdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were drafted, focussing on which findings should prompt recommendations for further workup. These recommendations discuss how to deal with incidental marrow changes, focal bone lesions, abnormalities of the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joints, fatty soft tissue masses, manifestations of renal osteodystrophy and finally discuss opportunistic osteoporosis evaluation.

The prevalence of incidental findings on pelvis MRI of 8-13-year-old children

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and clinical relevance of incidental findings (IF(s)) on imaging assessing the pelvis in children has not been well documented.

METHODS

Three-thousand two-hundred thirty-one children (mean age 10.2 (range 8.6-12.9) years) were evaluated with MRI of the hips, pelvis, and lumbar spine, as part of a prospective population-based pediatric cohort study. Scans were reviewed by trained medical staff for abnormalities. IFs were categorized by clinical relevance and need for further clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

8.3% (n = 267) of children featured at least one IF. One or more musculoskeletal IFs were found in 7.9% (n = 254) of children, however, only 0.8% (n = 2) of musculoskeletal IFs required clinical evaluation. Most frequent abnormalities were simple bone cysts 6.0% (n = 195), chondroid lesions 0.6% (n = 20), and perineural cysts 0.5% (n = 15). Intra-abdominal IFs were detected in 0.5% (n = 17) of children, with over half (n = 9) of these requiring evaluation. The three most common intra-abdominal IFs were a duplex collecting system 0.09% (n = 3), significant ascites 0.06% (n = 2), and hydroureteronephrosis 0.06% (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

IFs on MRI of the lower abdominal and hip region are relatively common in children aged 8-13 years, most of these can be confidently categorized as clinically irrelevant without the need for additional clinical or radiologic follow up.

IMPACT

Our research contributes greatly to the knowledge of the prevalence of (asymptomatic) pathology in children. We evaluated MR images of 3231 children, covering hip joints, pelvic skeleton, lower and mid-abdomen, and lumbar and lower thoracic spine as part of a population study. One or more musculoskeletal incidental finding were found in 7.9% of children. Most of these can be confidently categorized as clinically irrelevant without the need for additional follow up. However 0.8% of musculoskeletal findings required further evaluation. Intra-abdominal incidental findings were detected in 0.5% of children, with over half of the abdominal and urogenital findings requiring further evaluation.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in prostate cancer: Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings

OBJECTIVE

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is now recommended as a first-line staging modality in prostate cancer patients, and the widespread use of DWIBS may lead to an increased frequency of incidental findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with DWIBS.

METHODS

Data from 124 patients with prostate cancer (age, 76.5 ± 5.6 years), who underwent 1.5 T WB-MRI with STIR, TSE-T2, TSE-T1, In/Out GRE, and DWIBS sequences, were retrospectively analyzed. Findings unrelated to prostate cancer were considered as incidental findings and categorized into two groups based on their clinical implications as follows: imaging follow-up or additional examinations was required (significant incidental findings) and no need to additional work-up (non-significant incidental findings). A chi-square test was performed to compare the differences in the prevalence of significant incidental findings based on age (≤75 and>75 years old).

RESULTS

A total of 334 incidental findings were found with 8.1% (n = 27) as significant incidental findings. Significant incidental findings were more frequent in patients over 75 years old than those of 75 years old or younger (28.6% vs  11.1%, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant incidental findings, which required imaging follow-up or additional examinations, were commonly observed in prostate cancer patients on WB-MRI/DWIBS.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Some incidental findings were clinically significant that may lead to changes in treatment strategy. Checking the entire organ carefully for abnormalities and reporting any incidental findings detected are important.

Whole-body MRI for preventive health screening: Management strategies and clinical implications

PURPOSE

To document the diagnostic yields of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) screening for asymptomatic individuals by using a classification system that categorizes the findings by clinical relevance and provides a flowchart for further investigations, and to determine the influence of WB-MRI findings on clinical decision-making.

METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved study, a retrospective review of individuals who underwent WB-MRI between 2009 and 2020 was conducted, and asymptomatic participants who underwent non-contrast-enhanced comprehensive WB-MRI for screening were enrolled. Participants were classified into four categories based on WB-MRI findings, and those with relevant findings (i.e., categories 3 and 4) were referred for further diagnostic workup. The participants' medical records were investigated, and interviews were conducted to reveal false-negative findings and identify the number of WB-MRI-triggered treatments.

RESULTS

We included 576 participants (377 [65.4 %] men, 199 [34.6 %] women; mean age, 48.40 ± 10.82 years), of which 266 (46.2 %) and 310 (53.8 %) underwent WB-MRI with 1.5 T and 3.0 T magnets, respectively. Approximately one-third of the participants showed clinically relevant findings, and 65 (11.2 %) received a treatment triggered by WB-MRI. Notably, 15 (2.6 %) and 28 (4.8 %) participants had cancers and intracranial aneurysms, respectively. Of the 576 participants, 16 (2.8 %) had false-negative findings, among which five had cancers.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI yields numerous important findings that trigger therapeutic interventions in a large sample of asymptomatic adults. However, considering its inherent limitations, WB-MRI might be inadequate for detecting malignancies such as colon, thyroid, and breast cancers; thus, it may serve as a complementary screening method for health-conscious individuals.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in children - how and why? A systematic review

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for a number of indications. Our aim was to review and describe indications and scan protocols for diagnostic value of whole-body MRI for multifocal disease in children and adolescents, we conducted a systematic search in Medline, Embase and Cochrane for all published papers until November 2018. Relevant subject headings and free text words were used for the following concepts: 1) whole-body, 2) magnetic resonance imaging and 3) child and/or adolescent. Included were papers in English with a relevant study design that reported on the use and/or findings from whole-body MRI examinations in children and adolescents. This review includes 54 of 1,609 papers identified from literature searches. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, lymphoma and metastasis were the most frequent indications for performing a whole-body MRI. The typical protocol included a coronal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) sequence with or without a coronal T1-weighted sequence. Numerous studies lacked sufficient data for calculating images resolution and only a few studies reported the acquired voxel volume, making it impossible for others to reproduce the protocol/images. Only a minority of the included papers assessed reliability tests and none of the studies documented whether the use of whole-body MRI affected mortality and/or morbidity. Our systematic review confirms significant variability of technique and the lack of proven validity of MRI findings. The information could potentially be used to boost attempts towards standardization of technique, reporting and guidelines development.

Incidental findings associated with magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus

OBJECTIVE

The identification and management of incidental findings is becoming increasingly problematic, particularly in relation to brachial plexus imaging because the prevalence is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of incidental findings in symptomatic patients undergoing MRI of the brachial plexus.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all children and adults who underwent MRI over a 12-year period, in a tertiary care centre in the UK. An incidental finding was any abnormality which was not a direct injury to or disease-process of the brachial plexus. An "incidentaloma" was defined by the need for further investigation or treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of an "incidentaloma". To estimate which factors were associated with the incident rate ratio (IRR) of incidental findings, multivariable Poisson regression was used.

RESULTS

Overall, 502 scans (72%) reported incidental anomalies. Although the number of MRIs performed per annum increased by 23%, the prevalence of "incidentalomas" remained static (p = 0.766). Musculoskeletal incidental findings were the most prevalent (63%) and when identified, there were a median of 3 incidental anomalies per patient. Overall, 125 (18%) anomalies were "incidentalomas" which required further investigation or treatment. The odds of having further investigation or treatment was strongly related to the frequency of incidental findings [adjusted OR 1.16 (95% CI 1.08, 1.24)] and when a tumour was identified [adjusted OR 2.86 (95% CI 1.81, 4.53)]. The number of incidental findings recorded per scan increased when trainees co-reported with consultants [adjusted IRR 0.36 (95% CI 0.05, 0.67)] and in the presence of a tumour [adjusted IRR 0.39 (95% CI 0.28, 0.49)].

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of clinically important incidental findings on brachial plexus MRI is lower than organ-specific imaging, but still 18% of scans identified an 'incidentaloma' which required further investigation or treatment.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This cohort study shows that approximately 1 in 5 symptomatic patients undergoing a brachial plexus MRI had a clinically important incidental findings, which required further investigation or treatment. This information can be used to inform patients consenting to clinical or research imaging.

Incidental findings in whole-body MR imaging of a population-based cohort study: Frequency, management and psychosocial consequences

OBJECTIVES

Management of incidental findings (IF) remains controversial but highly relevant. Our aim was to assess the frequency, management and psychosocial consequences of IF reporting in a population-based cohort study undergoing whole-body MR imaging.

METHODS

The study was nested in a prospective cohort from a longitudinal, population-based cohort (KORA-FF4) in southern Germany. All MR obtained on 3 T MR scanner were reviewed by board-certified radiologists regarding clinically relevant IF. A baseline and follow-up questionnaires including PHQ-9 were completed prior to and 6-month after to the scan.

RESULTS

Of 400 participants (56.3 ± 9.2years, 58 % male) undergoing whole-body MR, IF were found in 22 % of participants (n = 89); most frequently located in the abdominal sequences. In the pre-scan survey, most participants stated as the motivation that they wanted to "contribute to a scientific purpose" (91 %), while "knowing whether I'm healthy" was the most frequent motivation reported 6 months post-scan (88 %). The desire for IF reporting increased over time (pre- vs. 6-months-post-scan), also for clinically less important IF (72 % vs. 84 %, p = 0.001). Regarding psychosocial impact, a small portion (3.4 %) reported that awaiting the IF report added "definitely" or "very probably" additional stress burden. Of participants with reported IF, 56.8 % classified the results as "very helpful". In the post-scan survey moderate depression was observed in 3.3 % and severe depression in 1.2 %. This did not differ between participants with and without reported IF.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort with whole-body MR imaging, the prevalence of IF was high. Participants considered reporting of IF highly important and added only minor psychological burden.

Health outcomes and experiences of direct-to-consumer high-intensity screening using both whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and cardiological examination

Background

Alongside a clinical and research setting, whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is increasingly offered as a direct-to-consumer screening service. Data is needed on the clinical relevance of findings and associated psychological impact of such screening. Therefore, we conducted a prospective follow-up study to provide insight in the effectiveness and psychological impact of direct-to-consumer screening using both WB-MRI and cardiological examination.

Methods and findings

The study population consisted of 3603 voluntary, primarily middle-aged participants who underwent commercial WB-MRI and cardiological screening at one of 6 study clinics in Germany or the Netherlands between July 2014 and March 2016. MRI investigation consisted of directed scans of the brain, neck, abdomen and pelvis. Cardiovascular examination included pulmonary function, resting electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiogram and a bicycle exercise stress test. Findings were assessed by experienced radiologists and cardiologists. In addition, participants were inquired about several (psychological) domains, including the expectations and consequences of the screening procedure. Out of 3603 individuals, 402 (11.2%) demonstrated abnormal MRI (n = 381) and/or cardiological findings (n = 79) for which they were advised to undergo further consultation <3 months in regular healthcare. In 59.1% of cases of abnormal MRI findings which were consulted, fully completed consultations were available in 87.1%. After consultation, 77.6% of initial MRI outcomes were adopted. In 40.9% of cases of abnormal MRI findings, recommendations for consultation were not adhered to during the study period. 71.1% of adopted MRI-findings required treatment or monitoring, including 19 malignancies. For abnormal cardiological findings, 70.9% of cases were consulted in regular healthcare. Of these, 91.1% had a completed follow-up procedure of which 72.5% of initial findings were adopted and 83.8% of these findings required treatment or monitoring. The most frequently reported psychological consequences of the screening procedure were getting reassurance (72.0%) and insight into one’s own health status (83.0%). 5.0% reported to feel insecure about their health and 6.2% worried more about their health as a consequence of screening. Main limitations of the study were considered the telephonic follow-up of referred clients and the heterogeneity of screening equipment and assessment of radiologists and cardiologists.

Conclusions

Direct-to-consumer screening using whole-body MRI and cardiological testing is feasible and effective for the detection of clinically relevant and treatable abnormalities. Psychological harm was not frequently reported in study participants.

Whole-body muscle magnetic resonance imaging in patients with muscle symptoms: incidental findings and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whole-body muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become widely used for diagnostic workup in patients with muscle diseases. The prevalence of incidental findings in diagnostic whole-body muscle MRI is unknown. Here, the prevalence and outcomes of incidentalomas in whole-body muscle MRI in a large cohort of patients with muscle symptoms were studied.

METHODS

Two hundred and six patients who consulted at our neuromuscular clinic with muscle weakness and/or myalgia and/or increased serum creatine kinase and in whom a whole-body muscle MRI was performed between January 2016 and March 2020 were included.

RESULTS

Whole-body muscle MRI revealed at least one incidentaloma in 132 patients (64.1%), with mean age at MRI examination 50.4 years (19-74 years). Most of the incidental findings were benign. However, diagnostic examinations were indicated in 16.3% of the incidentalomas, treatment was needed in 4.7% and, in retrospect, symptoms related to the incidental findings were identified in 14.3%. Three malignant (glioblastoma multiforme, renal cell carcinoma and hepato-splenomegaly related to a lymphoma) and one precancerous (low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm) incidental findings were identified. In one patient an abdominal aortic aneurysm was detected and in another a large cerebral arteriovenous malformation. In 1.2% of the incidentalomas, i.e. periventricular white matter lesions (LAMA2 mutations) and fibrous dysplasia (ANO5 mutations), an indirect link with the muscle disease could be established.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that incidental findings in diagnostic whole-body muscle MRI in patients with muscle symptoms occur frequently. Most of them are benign, but in some timely detecting the incidentaloma leads to early treatment and can thus impact prognosis.

Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal intra-psoas muscle schwannoma: A case report and extensive literature review

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue tumors of Schwann cells in either the peripheral or cranial nerves are known as schwannomas or also as neurilemmomas. Limited data exists regarding psoas muscle schwannoma in the literature. Therefore, we have done an extensive literature review and found a total number of 46 cases of intra-psoas schwannoma including our case, which are summarized in this article along with reporting our new case.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report a very rare case of primary left intra-psoas muscle schwannoma in a 39-year-old Saudi gentleman, smoker with an unremarkable medical and surgical history. The patient presented to the emergency department with exacerbated chronic lower abdominal pain since almost 2 years. After conforming the diagnosis, the patient was admitted electively and underwent uneventful laparoscopic hand-assisted resection.

DISCUSSION

Schwannomas are neurogenic tumors which known to be solitary, benign, well circumscribed, encapsulated, and slow-growing tumors. Multiple imaging modalities are used to detect such a tumor. Although there is no consensus on the best surgical approach, endoscopic mini-laparotomy, laparoscopy (anterior [as in our case] or lateral), and robotic resection were reported with good outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal schwannoma and intra-psoas muscle variant are a rare entity, with slow growing rate and risk of malignant transformation. Therefore, high index of suspicion, good follow-up, and large-cohort studies are encouraged.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: Incidental findings in paediatric and adult populations

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence and characterise the significance of incidental findings on whole-body MRI in paediatric and adult populations.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-institution study over a period of 8 years. The study population comprised 325 paediatric (0-18 yrs) patients and 148 adults (19-40 yrs) referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology centre, who underwent whole-body MRI for a range of pathological indications. Incidental findings were recorded according to pathology (musculoskeletal or non-musculoskeletal), site and clinical relevance.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven of 325 (26.8 %) paediatric patients and 51 of 148 (35.8 %) adults had incidental findings detected on whole-body MRI. The most common site was the musculoskeletal system, and within this location the lower limbs. Eighty-nine percent of incidental findings in paediatric patients and 79 % of incidental findings in adults were classified as being of either minor or no clinical significance.

CONCLUSION

Incidental findings are common in paediatric and adult patients undergoing whole-body MRI, and are most frequently found in the lower limbs. The overwhelming majority are of minor clinical significance.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for cancer screening in asymptomatic subjects of the general population: review and recommendations

Background

The number of studies describing the use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for screening of malignant tumours in asymptomatic subjects is increasing. Our aim is to review the methodologies used and the results of the published studies on per patient and per lesion analysis, and to provide recommendations on the use of WB-MRI for cancer screening.

Main body

We identified 12 studies, encompassing 6214 WB-MRI examinations, which provided the rates of abnormal findings and findings suspicious for cancer in asymptomatic subjects, from the general population. Eleven of 12 studies provided imaging protocols that included T1- and T2-weighted sequences, while only five included diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the whole body. Different categorical systems were used for the classification and the management of abnormal findings.

Of 17,961 abnormal findings reported, 91% were benign, while 9% were oncologically relevant, requiring further investigations, and 0.5% of lesions were suspicious for cancer.

A per-subject analysis showed that just 5% of subjects had no abnormal findings, while 95% had abnormal findings. Findings requiring further investigation were reported in 30% of all subjects, though in only 1.8% cancer was suspected. The overall rate of histologically confirmed cancer was 1.1%.

Conclusion

WB-MRI studies of cancer screening in the asymptomatic general population are too heterogeneous to draw impactful conclusions regarding efficacy. A 5-point lesion scale based on the oncological relevance of findings appears the most appropriate for risk-based management stratification. WB-MRI examinations should be reported by experienced oncological radiologists versed on WB-MRI reading abnormalities and on onward referral pathways.

Spleen phenotype in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

AIM

To evaluate splenic phenotype in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) including presence of cysts and splenomegaly to determine if these are ADPKD related or represent unrelated incidental findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The axial/coronal T2-weighted images of ADPKD patients (n=215) and age/gender-matched controls (n=215) were evaluated for the presence of T2-bright splenic lesions by three blinded observers. Spleen volume (SV) was evaluated in the context of clinical and imaging features as well as results of gene testing for PKD1 and PKD2 mutations.

RESULTS

T2-bright splenic lesions were found in 16 of 215 (7%) ADPKD patients compared to 11 of 215 (5%) control patients (p=0.32) and their prevalence was similar in patients with either PKD1 or PKD2 mutations. Median SV was significantly higher in ADPKD patients than controls (236 [182; 313 ml] versus 176 [129; 264 ml], p<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, height-adjusted SV (htSV) was not associated with the presence of liver cysts, haemorrhagic cysts, or infections; however, htSV was directly associated with height-adjusted total kidney volume (htTKV), a biomarker for ADPKD disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of T2-bright splenic lesions is similar in ADPKD patients and non-ADPKD controls, suggesting no relation to the diagnosis of ADPKD; however, splenic enlargement in ADPKD compared to controls could not be explained by liver cystic involvement, by infection/inflammatory conditions, or by haemorrhagic renal cysts. This combined with direct correlation of htSV with htTKV, a biomarker of ADPKD severity, suggests splenomegaly may be related to the pathogenesis of ADPKD.

Incidental findings in pancreas screening programs for high-risk individuals: Results from three European expert centers

Background

Widespread abdominal imaging has led to a substantial increase in the detection of incidentalomas. Currently, an increasing number of centers offer surveillance of the pancreas to individuals at high risk (IARs) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Objective

The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency and type of incidental findings in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based surveillance program for IARs for PDAC, and to discuss the benefit of detecting these lesions.

Methods

The outcome of MRI screening was reviewed in 568 individuals from three long-term pancreas surveillance programs conducted at three large European expert centers. All MRIs were studied in detail for the presence of incidental lesions.

Results

The most common lesions were liver cysts, renal cysts and liver hemangioma, which together comprised 75% of all lesions. Only five (0.9%) patients underwent surgery for a benign lesion. Cancer was detected in 11 patients (1.9%); early detection of tumors was beneficial in at least five cases.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that extrapancreatic incidentaloma is a common finding in IARs for PDAC, but rarely requires additional treatment. CDKN2A-p16-Leiden mutation carriers were the only patient group found to harbor a substantial number of cancers, and detection resulted in benefit in several cases.

Factors associated with potentially serious incidental findings and with serious final diagnoses on multi-modal imaging in the UK Biobank Imaging Study: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Feedback of potentially serious incidental findings (PSIFs) to imaging research participants generates clinical assessment in most cases. Understanding the factors associated with increased risks of PSIFs and of serious final diagnoses may influence individuals' decisions to participate in imaging research and will inform the design of PSIFs protocols for future research studies. We aimed to determine whether, and to what extent, socio-demographic, lifestyle, other health-related factors and PSIFs protocol are associated with detection of both a PSIF and a final diagnosis of serious disease.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Our cohort consisted of all UK Biobank participants who underwent imaging up to December 2015 (n = 7334, median age 63, 51.9% women). Brain, cardiac and body magnetic resonance, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images from the first 1000 participants were reviewed systematically by radiologists for PSIFs. Thereafter, radiographers flagged concerning images for radiologists' review. We classified final diagnoses as serious or not using data from participant surveys and clinical correspondence from GPs up to six months following imaging (either participant or GP correspondence, or both, were available for 93% of participants with PSIFs). We used binomial logistic regression models to investigate associations between age, sex, ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation, private healthcare use, alcohol intake, diet, physical activity, smoking, body mass index and morbidity, with both PSIFs and serious final diagnoses. Systematic radiologist review generated 13 times more PSIFs than radiographer flagging (179/1000 [17.9%] versus 104/6334 [1.6%]; age- and sex-adjusted OR 13.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.3-17.1] p<0.001) and proportionally fewer serious final diagnoses (21/179 [11.7%]; 33/104 [31.7%]). Risks of both PSIFs and of serious final diagnoses increased with age (sex-adjusted ORs [95% CI] for oldest [67-79 years] versus youngest [44-58 years] participants for PSIFs and serious final diagnoses respectively: 1.59 [1.07-2.38] and 2.79 [0.86 to 9.0] for systematic radiologist review; 1.88 [1.14-3.09] and 2.99 [1.09-8.19] for radiographer flagging). No other factor was significantly associated with either PSIFs or serious final diagnoses. Our study is the largest so far to investigate the factors associated with PSIFs and serious final diagnoses, but despite this, we still may have missed some associations due to sparsity of these outcomes within our cohort and small numbers within some exposure categories.

CONCLUSION

Risks of PSIFs and serious final diagnosis are substantially influenced by PSIFs protocol and to a lesser extent by age. As only 1/5 PSIFs represent serious disease, evidence-based PSIFs protocols are paramount to minimise over-investigation of healthy research participants and diversion of limited health services away from patients in need.

Whole-body MRI for preventive health screening: A systematic review of the literature

Background

The yield of whole‐body MRI for preventive health screening is currently not completely clear.

Purpose

To systematically review the prevalence of whole‐body MRI findings in asymptomatic subjects.

Study Type

Systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Subjects

MEDLINE and Embase were searched for original studies reporting whole‐body MRI findings in asymptomatic adults without known disease, syndrome, or genetic mutation. Twelve studies, comprising 5373 asymptomatic subjects, were included.

Field Strength/Sequence

1.5T or 3.0T, whole‐body MRI.

Assessment

The whole‐body MRI literature findings were extracted and reviewed by two radiologists in consensus for designation as either critical or indeterminate incidental finding.

Statistical Tests

Data were pooled using a random effects model on the assumption that most subjects had ≤1 critical or indeterminate incidental finding. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I² statistic.

Results

Pooled prevalences of critical and indeterminate incidental findings together and separately were 32.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.3%, 50.1%), 13.4% (95% CI: 9.0%, 19.5%), and 13.9% (95% CI: 5.4%, 31.3%), respectively. There was substantial between‐study heterogeneity (I² = 95.6–99.1). Pooled prevalence of critical and indeterminate incidental findings together was significantly higher in studies that included (cardio)vascular and/or colon MRI compared with studies that did not (49.7% [95% CI, 26.7%, 72.9%] vs. 23.0% [95% CI, 5.5%, 60.3%], P < 0.001). Pooled proportion of reported verified critical and indeterminate incidental findings was 12.6% (95% CI: 3.2%, 38.8%). Six studies reported false‐positive findings, yielding a pooled proportion of 16.0% (95% CI: 1.9%, 65.8%). None of the included studies reported long‐term (>5‐year) verification of negative findings. Only one study reported false‐negative findings, with a proportion of 2.0%.

Data Conclusion

Prevalence of critical and indeterminate incidental whole‐body MRI findings in asymptomatic subjects is overall substantial and with variability dependent to some degree on the protocol. Verification data are lacking. The proportion of false‐positive findings appears to be substantial.

Level of Evidence: 4

Technical Efficacy: Stage 3

J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1489–1503.

Potentially serious incidental findings on brain and body magnetic resonance imaging of apparently asymptomatic adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence and types of potentially serious incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in apparently asymptomatic adults, describe factors associated with potentially serious incidental findings, and summarise information on follow-up and final diagnoses.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

Citation searches of relevant articles and authors' files in Medline and Embase (from inception to 25 April 2017).

REVIEW METHODS

Eligible studies included prevalence and types of incidental findings detected among apparently asymptomatic adults undergoing MRI of the brain, thorax, abdomen, or brain and body. Data on study population and methods, prevalence and types of incidental findings, and final diagnoses were extracted. Pooled prevalence was estimated by random effects meta-analysis, and heterogeneity by τ2 statistics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of potentially serious incidental findings on MRI of the brain, thorax, abdomen, and brain and body.

RESULTS

Of 5905 retrieved studies, 32 (0.5%) met the inclusion criteria (n=27 643 participants). Pooled prevalence of potentially serious incidental findings was 3.9% (95% confidence interval 0.4% to 27.1%) on brain and body MRI, 1.4% (1.0% to 2.1%) on brain MRI, 1.3% (0.2% to 8.1%) on thoracic MRI, and 1.9% (0.3% to 12.0%) on abdominal MRI. Pooled prevalence rose after including incidental findings of uncertain potential seriousness (12.8% (3.9% to 34.3%), 1.7% (1.1% to 2.6%), 3.0% (0.8% to 11.3%), and 4.5% (1.5% to 12.9%), respectively). There was generally substantial heterogeneity among included studies. About half the potentially serious incidental findings were suspected malignancies (brain, 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.4% to 0.9%); thorax, 0.6% (0.1% to 3.1%); abdomen, 1.3% (0.2% to 9.3%); brain and body, 2.3% (0.3% to 15.4%)). There were few informative data on potential sources of between-study variation or factors associated with potentially serious incidental findings. Limited data suggested that relatively few potentially serious incidental findings had serious final diagnoses (48/234, 20.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of apparently asymptomatic adults will have potentially serious incidental findings on MRI, but little is known of their health consequences. Systematic, long term follow-up studies are needed to better inform on these consequences and the implications for policies on feedback of potentially serious incidental findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Prospero CRD42016029472.

Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging

Background: There are limited data on the impact of feedback of incidental findings (IFs) from research imaging.  We evaluated the impact of UK Biobank's protocol for handling potentially serious IFs in a multi-modal imaging study of 100,000 participants (radiographer 'flagging' with radiologist confirmation of potentially serious IFs) compared with systematic radiologist review of all images. Methods: Brain, cardiac and body magnetic resonance, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans from the first 1000 imaged UK Biobank participants were independently assessed for potentially serious IFs using both protocols. We surveyed participants with potentially serious IFs and their GPs up to six months after imaging to determine subsequent clinical assessments, final diagnoses, emotional, financial and work or activity impacts. Results: Compared to systematic radiologist review, radiographer flagging resulted in substantially fewer participants with potentially serious IFs (179/1000 [17.9%] versus 18/1000 [1.8%]) and a higher proportion with serious final diagnoses (21/179 [11.7%] versus 5/18 [27.8%]). Radiographer flagging missed 16/21 serious final diagnoses (i.e., false negatives), while systematic radiologist review generated large numbers of non-serious final diagnoses (158/179) (i.e., false positives). Almost all (90%) participants had further clinical assessment (including invasive procedures in similar numbers with serious and non-serious final diagnoses [11 and 12 respectively]), with additional impact on emotional wellbeing (16.9%), finances (8.9%), and work or activities (5.6%). Conclusions: Compared with systematic radiologist review, radiographer flagging missed some serious diagnoses, but avoided adverse impacts for many participants with non-serious diagnoses. While systematic radiologist review may benefit some participants, UK Biobank's responsibility to avoid both unnecessary harm to larger numbers of participants and burdening of publicly-funded health services suggests that radiographer flagging is a justifiable approach in the UK Biobank imaging study. The potential scale of non-serious final diagnoses raises questions relating to handling IFs in other settings, such as commercial and public health screening.

Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging

Background: There are limited data on the impact of feedback of incidental findings (IFs) from research imaging.  We evaluated the impact of UK Biobank's protocol for handling potentially serious IFs in a multi-modal imaging study of 100,000 participants (radiographer 'flagging' with radiologist confirmation of potentially serious IFs) compared with systematic radiologist review of all images. Methods: Brain, cardiac and body magnetic resonance, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans from the first 1000 imaged UK Biobank participants were independently assessed for potentially serious IFs using both protocols. We surveyed participants with potentially serious IFs and their GPs up to six months after imaging to determine subsequent clinical assessments, final diagnoses, emotional, financial and work or activity impacts. Results: Compared to systematic radiologist review, radiographer flagging resulted in substantially fewer participants with potentially serious IFs (179/1000 [17.9%] versus 18/1000 [1.8%]) and a higher proportion with serious final diagnoses (21/179 [11.7%] versus 5/18 [27.8%]). Radiographer flagging missed 16/21 serious final diagnoses (i.e., false negatives), while systematic radiologist review generated large numbers of non-serious final diagnoses (158/179) (i.e., false positives). Almost all (90%) participants had further clinical assessment (including invasive procedures in similar numbers with serious and non-serious final diagnoses [11 and 12 respectively]), with additional impact on emotional wellbeing (16.9%), finances (8.9%), and work or activities (5.6%). Conclusions: Compared with systematic radiologist review, radiographer flagging missed some serious diagnoses, but avoided adverse impacts for many participants with non-serious diagnoses. While systematic radiologist review may benefit some participants, UK Biobank's responsibility to avoid both unnecessary harm to larger numbers of participants and burdening of publicly-funded health services suggests that radiographer flagging is a justifiable approach in the UK Biobank imaging study. The potential scale of non-serious final diagnoses raises questions relating to handling IFs in other settings, such as commercial and public health screening.

Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging

Background: There are limited data on the impact of feedback of incidental findings (IFs) from research imaging.  We evaluated the impact of UK Biobank’s protocol for handling potentially serious IFs in a multi-modal imaging study of 100,000 participants (radiographer ‘flagging’ with radiologist confirmation of potentially serious IFs) compared with systematic radiologist review of all images.

Methods: Brain, cardiac and body magnetic resonance, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans from the first 1000 imaged UK Biobank participants were independently assessed for potentially serious IFs using both protocols. We surveyed participants with potentially serious IFs and their GPs up to six months after imaging to determine subsequent clinical assessments, final diagnoses, emotional, financial and work or activity impacts.

Results: Compared to systematic radiologist review, radiographer flagging resulted in substantially fewer participants with potentially serious IFs (179/1000 [17.9%] versus 18/1000 [1.8%]) and a higher proportion with serious final diagnoses (21/179 [11.7%] versus 5/18 [27.8%]). Radiographer flagging missed 16/21 serious final diagnoses (i.e., false negatives), while systematic radiologist review generated large numbers of non-serious final diagnoses (158/179) (i.e., false positives). Almost all (90%) participants had further clinical assessment (including invasive procedures in similar numbers with serious and non-serious final diagnoses [11 and 12 respectively]), with additional impact on emotional wellbeing (16.9%), finances (8.9%), and work or activities (5.6%).

Conclusions: Compared with systematic radiologist review, radiographer flagging missed some serious diagnoses, but avoided adverse impacts for many participants with non-serious diagnoses. While systematic radiologist review may benefit some participants, UK Biobank’s responsibility to avoid both unnecessary harm to larger numbers of participants and burdening of publicly-funded health services suggests that radiographer flagging is a justifiable approach in the UK Biobank imaging study. The potential scale of non-serious final diagnoses raises questions relating to handling IFs in other settings, such as commercial and public health screening.

Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives

BACKGROUND

As thousands of healthy research participants are being included in small and large imaging studies, it is essential that dilemmas raised by the detection of incidental findings are adequately handled. Current ethical guidance indicates that pathways for dealing with incidental findings should be in place, but does not specify what such pathways should look like. Building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives, we identified key considerations for the set-up of pathways for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging research.

METHODS

We conducted an interview study with a purposive sample of researchers (n = 20) at research facilities across the Netherlands. Based on a qualitative analysis of these interviews and on existing guidelines found in the literature, we developed a prototype ethical framework, which was critically assessed and fine-tuned during a two-day international expert meeting with bioethicists and representatives from large population-based imaging studies from the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden and Belgium (n = 14).

RESULTS

Practices and policies for the handling of incidental findings vary strongly across the Netherlands, ranging from no review of research scans and limited feedback to research participants, to routine review of scans and the arrangement of clinical follow-up. Respondents felt that researchers do not have a duty to actively look for incidental findings, but they do have a duty to act on findings, when detected. The principle of reciprocity featured prominently in our interviews and expert meeting.

CONCLUSION

We present an ethical framework that may guide researchers and research ethics committees in the design and/or evaluation of appropriate pathways for the handling of incidental findings in imaging studies. The framework consists of seven steps: anticipation of findings, information provision and informed consent, scan acquisition, review of scans, consultation on detected abnormalities, communication of the finding, and further clinical management and follow-up of the research participant. Each of these steps represents a key decision to be made by researchers, which should be justified not only with reference to costs and/or logistical considerations, but also with reference to researchers' moral obligations and the principle of reciprocity.

Fetal MRI: incidental findings in the mother

BACKGROUND

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a routinely used tool in prenatal diagnosis; however, there is a lack of studies evaluating incidental findings observed in the mother.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes and quantifies incidental findings observed in the mother during fetal MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all fetal MRI studies at the University of Minnesota Medical Center from February 2008 to September 2014. Two pediatric radiologists retrospectively conducted a consensus evaluation. The maternal findings were categorized into neurologic, gynecologic, urinary, gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal. Hydronephrosis consistent with the stage of pregnancy was recorded but was not included as an abnormal finding. Abnormal findings were classified into three groups, depending on their clinical significance: level I (low), level II (medium) and level III (high).

RESULTS

We evaluated 332 pregnant patients with a mean age of 29.3 years and a mean gestational age of 29 weeks. Of these, 55.4% had at least 1 incidental finding, for a total of 262 incidental maternal findings. Of the 262 abnormalities, 113 (43.1%) were neurologic, 69 were gynecologic (26.3%), 36 (13.7%) urinary, 24 (9.2%) gastrointestinal and 20 (7.6%) musculoskeletal. Of the 262 incidental findings, 237 (90.5%) were level I, 24 (9.2%) were level II and 1 (0.4%) was level III.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that although the vast majority of incidental maternal findings are benign, more significant findings are still encountered and should be expected.

Whole-Body MRI Screening in Asymptomatic Subjects; Preliminary Experience and Long-Term Follow-Up Findings

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to describe the technique and to evaluate the results of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in an asymptomatic population.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Between March 2009 and December 2011, 118 consecutive subjects undergoing thorough medical check-up were prospectively included in the study. MRI was performed with a 205-cm moving table, parallel imaging and automatic image composing software.

RESULTS

In 83 subjects (70%), 103 benign lesions were detected. Two malignant (adrenal and renal carcinoma) lesions and one precancerous (pancreatic mucinous carcinoma) lesion were detected. The most common lesions were renal cysts, liver hemangiomas, liver cysts, thyroid nodules, and uterine leiomyomas.

CONCLUSIONS

WB-MRI is able to cover area from head to toes in one diagnostic work-up, and besides the anatomic regions evaluated by conventional radiological modalities, i.e. brain parenchyma, bones and extremities, can be evaluated in one examination.

Whole-body MRI in patients with lymphoma: collateral findings

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of collateral findings detected on whole-body magnetic resonance (WB-MRI) scans performed on patients with lymphoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

114 patients (65 male; median age 45.2 years, range 15-86) with histologically confirmed lymphoma (47 Hodgkin, 67 Non-Hodgkin) underwent WB-MRI. The collateral findings were classified into three classes, according to their clinical significance, as follows: not or low significant (class 1), moderately or potentially significant (class 2), and significant (class 3). A Chi-square (χ (2)) test was performed to assess the statistical significance of differences in the incidence of collateral findings based on age (≤50 and >50 years old), gender and histology (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma).

RESULTS

Ninety-one of 114 patients (79.8 %) had one or more incidental findings on WB-MRI. Collateral findings were more frequent in class 1 (43 %); abnormalities found in 35 patients (30.7 %) were considered potentially significant, whereas seven patients (6.1 %) demonstrated significant collateral findings requiring immediate treatment or further diagnostic evaluation. Collateral findings were more frequent in subjects over 50 years old compared to those of 50 years old or younger; differences were statistical significant (χ (2) = 8.42, p < 0.05). There were not statistically significant differences related to gender (χ (2) = 0.17, p > 0.05) and histology (χ (2) = 0.24, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI is an attractive procedure that allows to detect incidental abnormalities of organs not involved by disease offering the opportunity to obtain an early diagnosis of asymptomatic life-threatening diseases.

Incidental findings detected on emergency abdominal CT scans: a 1-year review

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, there has been a substantial rise in the use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency medicine setting. Accordingly, with increased CT usage there has been an upsurge in incidental pathology detection.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all emergency CT abdominal scans performed at a university teaching hospital was examined. The frequency of incidental findings, their clinical significance and workload effect for the radiology department was assessed.

RESULTS

1155 patients had an emergency abdominal CT scan of which 700 had incidental findings detected. Of the incidental findings, 143 were deemed indeterminate requiring urgent investigations. Twenty-four occult neoplasms were confirmed subsequently. Additionally, 259 patients were recommended for additional diagnostics. The cumulative effect of the initial emergency abdominal CT was 15,015 relative value units (RVU). Subsequent imaging of incidental findings resulted in another 1674 RVU workload for radiology.

CONCLUSION

Incidental findings cause considerable debate and concern over which patients require significant follow-up, investigations, and/or surveillance. This exerts significant pressures on sub-specialties for their expert input, with increased workload and implications on healthcare service provision.

Extravascular incidental findings in run-off CT angiography in patients with acute limb ischaemia: incidence and clinical relevance

AIM

To evaluate the incidence and clinical relevance of extravascular incidental findings (EVIFs) in CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities (run-off CTA) in patients presenting with acute limb ischaemia (ALI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved, retrospective study, 141 run-off CTA examinations conducted between 2005 and 2013 of patients (67 women, mean age 80 years; 74 men, mean age 69 years) presenting with clinical symptoms of ALI were re-evaluated by two radiologists (2 and 7 years of experience in interpreting run-off CTA). Imaging was conducted using 16- and 64-section CT systems. Image acquisition ranged from the costodiaphragmatic recess to the forefoot. The medical history form of each patient served as the standard of reference for assessment of incidence of EVIFs. CT morphology was assessed to assign EVIFs to one of three categories of clinical relevance: (I) immediate, (II) potential, and (III) no clinical relevance.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients had category I findings, including four patients (2.8%) with previously unknown malignancy and 67 patients with category II EVIFs. In total 473 extravascular EVIFs were found in 141 patients: 52 category I, 163 category II and 258 category III.

CONCLUSION

EVIFs with immediate clinical relevance are very common in run-off CTA in patients presenting with acute peripheral artery disease. Therefore, it is important to evaluate all body regions included in a CT examination carefully, even if the clinical focus is on vascular evaluation. The adequate classification of these EVIFs is required to avoid possible unnecessary diagnostic work-up with associated risks and costs.

Incidence and evaluation of incidental abnormal bone marrow signal on magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose. The increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has resulted in reports of incidental abnormal bone marrow (BM) signal. Our goal was to determine the evaluation of an incidental abnormal BM signal on MRI and the prevalence of a subsequent oncologic diagnosis. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients over age 18 undergoing MRI between May 2005 and October 2010 at Tufts Medical Center (TMC) with follow-up through November 2013. The electronic medical record was queried to determine imaging site, reason for scan, evaluation following radiology report, and final diagnosis. Results. 49,678 MRIs were done with 110 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Twenty two percent underwent some evaluation, most commonly a complete blood count, serum protein electrophoresis, or bone scan. With median follow-up of 41 months, 6% of patients were diagnosed with malignancies including multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. One patient who had not undergone evaluation developed breast cancer 24 months after the MRI. Conclusions. Incidentally noted abnormal or heterogeneous bone marrow signal on MRI was not inconsequential and should prompt further evaluation.

Non-contrast-enhanced whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the general population: the incidence of abnormal findings in patients 50 years old and younger compared to older subjects

Purpose

To assess and compare the incidence of abnormal findings detected during non-contrast-enhanced whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in the general population in two age groups: (1) 50 years old and younger; and (2) over 50 years old.

Materials and Methods

The analysis included 666 non-contrast-enhanced WB-MRIs performed on a 1.5-T scanner between December 2009 and June 2013 in a private hospital in 451 patients 50 years old and younger and 215 patients over 50 years old. The following images were obtained: T2-STIR (whole body-coronal plane), T2-STIR (whole spine-sagittal), T2-TSE with fat-saturation (neck and trunk-axial), T2-FLAIR (head-axial), 3D T1-GRE (thorax-coronal, axial), T2-TSE (abdomen-axial), chemical shift (abdomen-axial). Detected abnormalities were classified as: insignificant (type I), potentially significant, requiring medical attention (type II), significant, requiring treatment (type III).

Results

There were 3375 incidental findings depicted in 659 (98.9%) subjects: 2997 type I lesions (88.8%), 363 type II lesions (10.8%) and 15 type III lesions (0.4%), including malignant or possibly malignant lesions in seven subjects. The most differences in the prevalence of abnormalities on WB-MRI between patients 50 years old and younger and over 50 years old concerned: brain infarction (22.2%, 45.0% respectively), thyroid cysts/nodules (8.7%, 18.8%), pulmonary nodules (5.0%, 16.2%), significant degenerative disease of the spine (23.3%, 44.5%), extra-spinal degenerative disease (22.4%, 61.1%), hepatic steatosis (15.8%, 24.9%), liver cysts/hemangiomas (24%, 34.5%), renal cysts (16.9%, 40.6%), prostate enlargement (5.1% of males, 34.2% of males), uterine fibroids (16.3% of females, 37.9% of females).

Conclusions

Incidental findings were detected in almost all of the subjects. WB-MRI demonstrated that the prevalence of the vast majority of abnormalities increases with age.

Pituitary incidentalomas: application of an evidence-based approach at the individual patient and population levels

With the widespread use of imaging techniques, incidental discovery of clinically unsuspected pituitary adenomas is increasing in frequency and will increase further. The Endocrine Society Task Force on Pituitary Incidentalomas has developed practice guidelines which reflect the best available evidence combined with the opinions of experts in pituitary diseases. For incidental macroadenomas, evidence supporting comprehensive evaluation (for hyperfunction, hypopituitarism and anatomy) and management (whether surgical or careful follow-up) is strong. By contrast, evidence supporting approaches to microadenomas without clinical suggestion of hormonal hypersecretion are relatively weak and practice varies. Developing more evidence will require approaches other than randomized controlled trials, such as comparative effectiveness studies. Incidentalomas represent part of a larger societal issue, that being overdiagnosis and its consequences.

Whole body fat: content and distribution

Obesity and its co-morbidities, including type II diabetes, insulin resistance and cardiovascular diseases, have become one of the biggest health issues of present times. The impact of obesity goes well beyond the individual and is so far-reaching that, if it continues unabated, it will cause havoc with the economies of most countries. In order to be able to fully understand the relationship between increased adiposity (obesity) and its co-morbidity, it has been necessary to develop proper methodology to accurately and reproducibly determine both body fat content and distribution, including ectopic fat depots. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Spectroscopy (MRS) have recently emerged as the gold-standard for accomplishing this task. Here, we will review the use of different MRI techniques currently being used to determine body fat content and distribution. We also discuss the pros and cons of MRS to determine ectopic fat depots in liver, muscle, pancreas and heart and compare these to emerging MRI techniques currently being put forward to create ectopic fat maps. Finally, we will discuss how MRI/MRS techniques are helping in changing the perception of what is healthy and what is normal and desirable body-fat content and distribution.

Bone marrow enhancement during time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography of the pelvis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether visible bone marrow enhancement (BME) at pelvic magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) correlates with anemia.

METHODS

This is an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study. Seventy-five female patients with a hemoglobin (Hb) test within 10 days of an MRA examination of the pelvis are included, mean age of 46 years (range, 18-81 years). The BME was graded using a 4-point scale. Fifteen subjects had sufficient imaging data for calculation of quantitative perfusion parameters. Receiver operating characteristic and analysis of covariance were performed for 2 levels of anemia.

RESULTS

Enhancement was visually present in 44% (33/75) of cases; 66% (19/29) of anemic subjects (Hb < 12 g/dL), and 30% (14/46) of nonanemic subjects (P = 0.002). Enhancement had a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 92.5% for the diagnosis of severe anemia (Hb < 10 g/dL); 88% (7/8) of these subjects had moderate to marked enhancement. A high extraction coefficient (Kep) in the iliac crest was associated with anemia, with an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.85 for mild anemia and 0.92 for severe anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Visible BME during time-resolved MRA is common and may be related to anemia.

Clinical, ethical and financial implications of incidental imaging findings: experience from a phase I trial in healthy elderly volunteers

Background

The detection of incidental findings (IF) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies is common and increases as a function of age. Responsible handling of IF is required, with implications for the conduct of research and the provision of good clinical care.

Aim

To investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of IF in a prospective cohort of healthy elderly volunteers who underwent MRI of the torso as a baseline investigation for a phase I trial. We assessed the follow-up pathway with consequent cost implications and impact on trial outcomes.

Methods

A total of 29 elderly healthy volunteers (mean age 67, range 61–77, 59% female) were eligible at screening and underwent MRI for assessment of visceral and subcutaneous fat.

Results

IF were detected in 19 subjects (66%). Suspected IF of high and low clinical significance were found in 14% and 52% of participants, respectively. Follow up of IF was conducted in 18 individuals, confirming abnormalities in 13 subjects, 3 of whom were recommended for deferred clinical re-evaluation. The remaining 5 subjects had false positive IF based on second line imaging tests. Costs of follow-up medical care were considerable.

Conclusion

MRI abnormalities are common in elderly individuals, as a result of age and non-diagnostic quality of research scans. In the presence of IF in the context of clinical trials, immediate referrals and follow up assessments may be required to rule out suspected pathology prior to exposing trial participants to investigational medicine products (IMP). Unanticipated costs, ethical implication and the possible impact of IF on trial outcomes need to be taken into account when designing and conducting trials with an IMP.