Background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in positron emission mammography (PEM): correlation with mammographic density and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI

Correlation between breast cancer and background parenchymal uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate differences in background parenchymal uptake (BPU) between patients with and without breast cancer using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

METHODS

Female patients (n = 130, 62.9 ± 12.7 years) with newly diagnosed breast cancer and 50 healthy participants (59.6 ± 13.3 years) without breast cancer were retrospectively included. BPU was evaluated using the maximum standardized uptake value. Data on participant age, body mass index, blood glucose level, and menopausal status were collected from medical records. Breast density was evaluated using mammography. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the correlation between breast cancer and various characteristic factors, including BPU.

RESULTS

The BPU of patients with breast cancer was significantly higher than that of controls (P < 0.001). The results of logistic regression analysis regarding the presence of breast cancer demonstrated that BPU and menopausal status showed higher odds ratios of 13.6 and 4.25, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for BPU was 0.751.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with breast cancer showed higher 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-BPU. Glucose metabolism of mammary glands may correlate with the development of breast cancer.

18F-FDG Dedicated Breast PET Complementary to Breast MRI for Evaluating Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare quantitative measures of tumor metabolism and perfusion using fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dedicated breast PET (dbPET) and breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI during early treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods Prospectively collected DCE MRI and 18F-FDG dbPET examinations were analyzed at baseline (T0) and after 3 weeks (T1) of NAC in 20 participants with 22 invasive breast cancers. FDG dbPET-derived standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and MRI-derived percent enhancement (PE), signal enhancement ratio (SER), and functional tumor volume (FTV) were calculated at both time points. Differences between FDG dbPET and MRI parameters were evaluated after stratifying by receptor status, Ki-67 index, and residual cancer burden. Parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results High Ki-67 tumors had higher baseline SUVmean (difference, 5.1; P = .01) and SUVpeak (difference, 5.5; P = .04). At T1, decreases were observed in FDG dbPET measures (pseudo-median difference T0 minus T1 value [95% CI]) of SUVmax (-6.2 [-10.2, -2.6]; P < .001), SUVmean (-2.6 [-4.9, -1.3]; P < .001), SUVpeak (-4.2 [-6.9, -2.3]; P < .001), and TLG (-29.1 mL3 [-71.4, -6.8]; P = .005) and MRI measures of SERpeak (-1.0 [-1.3, -0.2]; P = .02) and FTV (-11.6 mL3 [-22.2, -1.7]; P = .009). Relative to nonresponsive tumors, responsive tumors showed a difference (95% CI) in percent change in SUVmax of -34.3% (-55.9%, 1.5%; P = .06) and in PEpeak of -42.4% (95% CI: -110.5%, 8.5%; P = .08). Conclusion 18F-FDG dbPET was sensitive to early changes during NAC and provided complementary information to DCE MRI that may be useful for treatment response evaluation. Keywords: Breast, PET, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Clinical trial registration no. NCT01042379 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Progesterone Receptor-Mediated Regulation of Cellular Glucose and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Breast Cancer

Context

Positron emission tomography imaging with 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) is used clinically for initial staging, restaging, and assessing therapy response in breast cancer. Tumor FDG uptake in steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and physiologic FDG uptake in normal breast tissue can be affected by hormonal factors such as menstrual cycle phase, menopausal status, and hormone replacement therapy.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the role of the progesterone receptor (PR) in regulating glucose and FDG uptake in breast cancer cells.

Methods and Results

PR-positive T47D breast cancer cells treated with PR agonists had increased FDG uptake compared with ethanol control. There was no significant change in FDG uptake in response to PR agonists in PR-negative MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-468 cells, or T47D PR knockout cells. Treatment of T47D cells with PR antagonists inhibited the effect of R5020 on FDG uptake. Using T47D cell lines that only express either the PR-A or the PR-B isoform, PR agonists increased FDG uptake in both cell types. Experiments using actinomycin D and cycloheximide demonstrated the requirement for both transcription and translation in PR regulation of FDG uptake. GLUT1 and PFKFB3 mRNA expression and the enzymatic activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase were increased after progestin treatment of T47D cells.

Conclusion

Thus, progesterone and progestins increase FDG uptake in T47D breast cancer cells through the classical action of PR as a ligand-activated transcription factor. Ligand-activated PR ultimately increases expression and activity of proteins involved in glucose uptake, glycolysis, and the pentose phosphate pathway.

Physiological background parenchymal uptake of 18F-FDG in normal breast tissues using dedicated breast PET: correlation with mammographic breast composition, menopausal status, and menstrual cycle

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effects of age, mammographic density, menopausal status, and menstrual cycle on background parenchymal uptake (BPU) using ring-shaped dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET).

METHODS

This study included 186 adult women who underwent mammography and dbPET on the same day and had no abnormalities classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 1 on both examinations. The volume of interest (VOI) was placed in the glandular tissue of both breasts, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean), and metabolic breast volume (MBV) were measured as indicators of BPU. We analyzed the correlation between BPU and age, mammographic density, menopausal status, and menstrual cycle.

RESULTS

The SUV_max and SUV_mean for normal breast tissue were inversely correlated with age (both p < 0.001). The SUV_max, SUV_mean, and MBV of mammographically dense breast tissues were significantly higher than those of non-dense breast tissues (all p < 0.001). The SUV_max, SUV_mean, and MBV of normal breast tissue in premenopausal women were significantly higher than those in postmenopausal women (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). In the study, 59 premenopausal women, the SUV_max of normal breast tissue in the menstrual-follicular phase was significantly lower than that in the periovulatory-luteal phase (p = 0.02). When we sorted the premenopausal women by mammographic breast composition, the SUV_max and SUV_mean of normal breast tissues in the menstrual-follicular phase were significantly lower than those in the periovulatory-luteal phase in the 44 premenopausal women with dense breasts (p = 0.007, and p = 0.038, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference was found between the menstrual-follicular phase and the periovulatory-luteal phase in the 15 premenopausal women with non-dense breasts.

CONCLUSIONS

BPU in normal breast tissues assessed using ring-shaped dbPET was associated with mammographic density, menopausal status, and women's menstrual cycle. The menstrual cycle was significantly associated with BPU in premenopausal women with dense breasts but not in women with non-dense breasts.

Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) levels on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and MRI, evaluate inter-reader reliability, and analyze the relationship between clinical factors and BPE level on CE-CBBCT.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients who underwent both CE-CBBCT and MRI were analyzed. BPE levels on CE-CBBCT and MRI were assessed by five specialists independently in random fashion, with a wash-out period of 4 weeks. Weighted kappa was used to analyze the agreement between CE-CBBCT and MRI, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-reader reliability for each modality. The association between BPE level on CE-CBBCT and clinical factors was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients from January 2017 to April 2021 were enrolled. CE-CBBCT showed substantial agreement (weighted kappa = 0.690) with MRI for BPE evaluation, with good degree of inter-reader reliability on both CE-CBBCT (ICC = 0.712) and MRI (ICC = 0.757). Based on majority reports, BPE levels on CE-CBBCT were lower than MRI (p < 0.001). BPE level on CE-CBBCT was significantly associated with menstrual status (odds ratio, OR = 0.125), breast density (OR = 2.308), and previously treated breast cancer (OR = 0.052) (all p < 0.05). BPE level for premenopausal patients was associated with menstrual cycle, with lower BPE level for the 2^nd week of menstrual cycle (OR = 0.246).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-CBBCT showed substantial agreement and comparable inter-reader reliability with MRI for BPE evaluation, indicating that the corresponding BI-RADS lexicons could be used to describe BPE level on CE-CBBCT. The 2^nd week of menstrual cycle timing is suggested as the optimal examination period for CE-CBBCT.

KEY POINTS

• CE-CBBCT showed substantial agreement and comparable inter-reader reliability with MRI for BPE evaluation. • Menstrual status, breast density, and previously treated breast cancer were associated with the BPE level on CE-CBBCT images. • The 2^ndweek of the menstrual cycle is suggested as the optimal examination period for CE-CBBCT.

Background parenchymal enhancement and uptake as breast cancer imaging biomarkers: A state-of-the-art review

Within the past decade, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and background parenchymal uptake (BPU) have emerged as novel imaging-derived biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. Growing evidence supports the role of breast parenchyma vascularity and metabolic activity as probable risk factors for breast cancer development. Furthermore, in the presence of a newly-diagnosed breast cancer, added clinically-relevant data was surprisingly found in the respective imaging properties of the non-affected contralateral breast. Evaluation of the contralateral BPE and BPU have been found to be especially instrumental in predicting the prognosis of a patient with breast cancer and even anticipating their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Simultaneously, further research has found a link between these two biomarkers, even though they represent different physical properties. The aim of this review is to provide an up to date summary of the current clinical applications of BPE and BPU as breast cancer imaging biomarkers with the hope that it propels their further usage in clinical practice.

Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

Using phantoms and clinical studies in prone hanging breast imaging, we assessed the image quality of a commercially available dedicated breast PET (dbPET) at the detector's edge, where mammary glands near the chest wall are located. These are compared to supine PET/CT breast images of the same clinical subjects.

METHODS

A breast phantom with four spheres (16-, 10-, 7.5-, and 5-mm diameter) was filled with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose solution (sphere-to-background activity concentration ratio, 8:1). The spheres occupied five different positions from the top edge to the centre of the detector and were scanned for 5 min in each position. Reconstructed images were visually evaluated, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) for all spheres, and coefficient of variation of the background (CV_B) were calculated. Subsequently, clinical images obtained with standard supine PET/CT and prone dbPET were retrospectively analysed. Tumour-to-background ratios (TBRs) between breast cancer near the chest wall (close to the detector's edge; peripheral group) and at other locations (non-peripheral group) were compared. The TBR of each lesion was compared between dbPET and PET/CT.

RESULTS

Closer to the detector's edge, the CNR and CRC of all spheres decreased while the CV_B increased in the phantom study. The disadvantages of this placement were visually confirmed. Regarding clinical images, TBR of dbPET was significantly higher than that of PET/CT in both the peripheral (12.38 ± 6.41 vs 6.73 ± 3.5, p = 0.0006) and non-peripheral (12.44 ± 5.94 vs 7.71 ± 7.1, p = 0.0183) groups. There was no significant difference in TBR of dbPET between the peripheral and non-peripheral groups.

CONCLUSION

The phantom study revealed poorer image quality at < 2-cm distance from the detector's edge than at other more central parts. In clinical studies, however, the visibility of breast lesions with dbPET was the same regardless of the lesion position, and it was higher than that in PET/CT. dbPET has a great potential for detecting breast lesions near the chest wall if they are at least 2 cm from the edge of the FOV, even in young women with small breasts.

Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions

Recent advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation have led to the emergence of improved molecular imaging techniques to image breast cancer: dedicated gamma cameras using γ-emitting ^99mTc-sestamibi and breast-specific PET cameras using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. This article focuses on the current role of such approaches in the clinical setting including diagnosis, assessing local extent of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and, for gamma camera imaging, possible supplemental screening in women with dense breasts. Barriers to clinical adoption and technologies and radiotracers under development are also discussed.

Preliminary analysis: Background parenchymal 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer patients appears to correlate with background parenchymal enhancement and to vary by distance from the index cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate how breast parenchymal uptake (BPU) of 18F-FDG on positron emission tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with breast cancer is related to background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT), and age, as well as whether BPU varies as a function of distance from the primary breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective study, 40 patients (all female, ages 32-80 years, mean 52 years) gave informed consent prior to undergoing contrast enhanced breast PET/MRI from 3/2015 to 2/2018. Of the 40 patients, 6 were excluded for multicentric or bilateral cancers, 1 for current lactation and 6 because the raw data from their scans were corrupted. The remaining 27 patients (all female, ages 33 to 80 years, mean age 53 years) comprised the study population. Prone PET and contrast-enhanced MR data were acquired simultaneously on a 3-T integrated PET/ MR system. BPU was measured as SUVmax of a 1.5 cm³ volume of interest 1) in the same quadrant of the ipsilateral breast, 5 mm from the index lesion; 2) in the opposite quadrant of the ipsilateral breast; and 3) in contralateral breast, quadrant matched to the opposite quadrant of the ipsilateral breast. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the index cancer was measured using a VOI that included the entire volume of the index lesion. Bleed from the primary tumor was corrected for (PET edge, MIM). FGT and BPE was assessed by 2 readers on a 4-point scale in accordance with BI-RADS lexicon. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Spearman rank correlation test were performed.

RESULTS

BPU was significantly greater in the same quadrant as the breast cancer as compared with the opposite quadrant of the same breast (p < 0.001 for both readers) and was significantly greater in the opposite quadrant of the same breast compared to the matched quadrant of the contralateral breast (p = 0.002 for reader 1 and <0.001 for reader 2). While the FGT SUVmax in the same quadrant as the cancer correlated significantly with SUVmax of the index lesion, the FGT SUVmax in the opposite quadrant of the same breast and in the matched quadrant of the contralateral breast did not. The FGT SUVmax in the contralateral breast positively correlated with the degree of BPE and negatively correlated with age, but did not show a significant correlation with the amount of FGT for either reader.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be an inverse correlation between metabolic activity of normal breast parenchyma and distance from the index cancer. BPU significantly correlates with BPE.

Use of Breast-Specific PET Scanners and Comparison with MR Imaging

The goals of this article are to discuss the role of breast-specific PET imaging of women with breast cancer, compare the clinical performance of positron emission mammography (PEM) and MR imaging for current indications, and provide recommendations for when women should undergo PEM instead of breast MR imaging.

Newly-Developed Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) Device for the Detection of Small Breast Cancer

Positron emission mammography (PEM) has higher detection sensitivity for breast cancer compared with whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) due to higher spatial resolution. We have developed a new PEM device with high resolution over a wide field of view. This PEM device comprises novel scintillation crystals, praseodymium-doped lutetium aluminum garnet (Pr:LuAG). In the present study, the clinical use of the newly developed PEM for the detection of small breast cancer was compared with that of the conventional PET-computed tomography (PET/CT). Eighty-two patients with breast cancer less than 20 mm (UICC T1) participated in this study, including 23 patients with T1a or T1b breast cancer (less than 10 mm). Histologically-proved lesions were examined by PET/CT and PEM on the same day after injection of [¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG), a marker of glycolytic activity. The newly developed PEM showed better sensitivity of cancer detection compared with PET/CT especially in case of the small T1a or T1b lesions. Moreover, when the conventional PET/CT and new PEM were combined, the detection sensitivity with [¹⁸F]FDG molecular imaging for T1 (N = 82) and T1a plus T1b breast cancer (N = 23) were 90% and 70%, respectively. The uptake of [¹⁸F]FDG was proportional to the histological malignancy of breast cancer. Using the newly-developed PEM with [¹⁸F]FDG, we are able to identify and characterize exactly the small breast tumors less than 10 mm in combination with the conventional PET/CT. These data indicate that PEM and PET/CT are synergic and complementary for the detection of small breast cancer.

Does breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement indicate metabolic activity? Qualitative and 3D quantitative computer imaging analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the degree of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is associated with the amount of breast metabolic activity measured by breast parenchymal uptake (BPU) of 18F-FDG on positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study was performed. Of 327 patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI from 1/1/12 to 12/31/15, 73 patients had 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation performed within 1 week of breast MRI and no suspicious findings in the contralateral breast. MRI was performed on a 1.5T or 3.0T system. The imaging sequence included a triplane localizing sequence followed by sagittal fat-suppressed T₂ -weighted sequence, and a bilateral sagittal T₁ -weighted fat-suppressed fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence, which was performed before and three times after a rapid bolus injection (gadobenate dimeglumine, Multihance; Bracco Imaging; 0.1 mmol/kg) delivered through an IV catheter. The unaffected contralateral breast in these 73 patients underwent BPE and BPU assessments. For PET/CT BPU calculation, a 3D region of interest (ROI) was drawn around the glandular breast tissue and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max ) was determined. Qualitative MRI BPE assessments were performed on a 4-point scale, in accordance with BI-RADS categories. Additional 3D quantitative MRI BPE analysis was performed using a previously published in-house technique. Spearman's correlation test and linear regression analysis was performed (SPSS, v. 24).

RESULT

The median time interval between breast MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation was 3 days (range, 0-6 days). BPU SUV_max mean value was 1.6 (SD, 0.53). Minimum and maximum BPU SUV_max values were 0.71 and 4.0. The BPU SUV_max values significantly correlated with both the qualitative and quantitative measurements of BPE, respectively (r(71) = 0.59, P < 0.001 and r(71) = 0.54, P < 0.001). Qualitatively assessed high BPE group (BI-RADS 3/4) had significantly higher BPU SUV_max of 1.9 (SD = 0.44) compared to low BPE group (BI-RADS 1/2) with an average BPU SUV_max of 1.17 (SD = 0.32) (P < 0.001). On linear regression analysis, BPU SUV_max significantly predicted qualitative and quantitative measurements of BPE (β = 1.29, t(71) = 3.88, P < 0.001 and β = 19.52, t(71) = 3.88, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant association between breast BPU and BPE, measured both qualitatively and quantitatively. Increased breast cancer risk in patients with high MRI BPE could be due to elevated basal metabolic activity of the normal breast tissue, which may provide a susceptible environment for tumor growth.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:753-759.

Imaging Management of Breast Density, a Controversial Risk Factor for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast density is well recognized as an independent risk factor for the development of breast cancer. However, the magnitude of risk is controversial. As the public becomes increasingly aware of breast density as a risk factor, legislation and notification laws in relation to breast density have become common throughout the United States. Awareness of breast density as a risk factor for breast cancer presents new challenges for the clinician in the approach to the management and screening of women with dense breasts.

METHODS

The evidence and controversy surrounding breast density as a risk factor for the development of breast cancer are discussed. Common supplemental screening modalities for breast cancer are also discussed, including tomosynthesis, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. A management strategy for screening women with dense breasts is also presented.

RESULTS

The American College of Radiology recognizes breast density as a controversial risk factor for breast cancer, whereas the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recognizes breast density as a modest risk factor. Neither organization recommends the routine use of supplemental screening in women with dense breasts without considering additional patient-related risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast density is a poorly understood and controversial risk factor for the development of breast cancer. Mammography is a screening modality proven to reduce breast cancer-related mortality rates and is the single most appropriate tool for population-based screening. Use of supplemental screening modalities should be tailored to individual risk assessment.

Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the methods used for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) evaluation on breast MRI.

METHODS

Studies dealing with BPE assessment on breast MRI were retrieved from major medical libraries independently by four reviewers up to 6 October 2015. The keywords used for database searching are "background parenchymal enhancement", "parenchymal enhancement", "MRI" and "breast". The studies were included if qualitative and/or quantitative methods for BPE assessment were described.

RESULTS

Of the 420 studies identified, a total of 52 articles were included in the systematic review. 28 studies performed only a qualitative assessment of BPE, 13 studies performed only a quantitative assessment and 11 studies performed both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A wide heterogeneity was found in the MRI sequences and in the quantitative methods used for BPE assessment.

CONCLUSION

A wide variability exists in the quantitative evaluation of BPE on breast MRI. More studies focused on a reliable and comparable method for quantitative BPE assessment are needed. Advances in knowledge: More studies focused on a quantitative BPE assessment are needed.

Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission mammography (PEM) for identifying malignant lesions in patients with suspicious microcalcifications detected on mammography.

METHODS

A prospective, single-centre study that evaluated 40 patients with suspicious calcifications at mammography and indication for percutaneous or surgical biopsy, with mean age of 56.4 years (range: 28-81 years). Patients who agreed to participate in the study underwent PEM with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose before the final histological evaluation. PEM findings were compared with mammography and histological findings.

RESULTS

Most calcifications (n = 34; 85.0 %) were classified as BIRADS 4. On histology, there were 25 (62.5 %) benign and 15 (37.5 %) malignant lesions, including 11 (27.5 %) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 4 (10 %) invasive carcinomas. On subjective analysis, PEM was positive in 15 cases (37.5 %) and most of these cases (n = 14; 93.3 %) were confirmed as malignant on histology. There was one false-positive result, which corresponded to a fibroadenoma, and one false negative, which corresponded to an intermediate-grade DCIS. PEM had a sensitivity of 93.3 %, specificity of 96.0 % and accuracy of 95 %.

CONCLUSION

PEM was able to identify all invasive carcinomas and high-grade DCIS (nuclear grade 3) in the presented sample, suggesting that this method may be useful for further evaluation of patients with suspected microcalcifications.

KEY POINTS

• Many patients with suspicious microcalcifications at mammography have benign results at biopsy. • PEM may help to identify invasive carcinomas and high-grade DCIS. • Management of patients with suspicious calcifications can be improved.

Quantitative Assessment of Breast Parenchymal Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT: Correlation with Age, Background Parenchymal Enhancement, and Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MRI

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) assessed with MRI have been implicated as sensitive imaging biomarkers for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess breast parenchymal uptake (BPU) on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT as another valuable imaging biomarker and examine its correlation with BPE, FGT, and age.

METHODS

This study included 129 patients with suspected breast cancer and normal imaging findings in one breast (BI-RADS 1), whose cases were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent prone ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and 3-T contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. In all patients, interpreter 1 assessed BPU quantitatively using SUV_max Interpreters 1 and 2 assessed amount of FGT and BPE in the normal contralateral breast by subjective visual estimation, as recommended by BI-RADS. Interpreter 1 reassessed all cases and repeated the BPU measurements. Statistical tests were used to assess correlations between BPU, BPE, FGT, and age, as well as inter- and intrainterpreter agreement.

RESULTS

BPU on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT varied among patients. The mean BPU SUV_max ± SD was 1.57 ± 0.6 for patients with minimal BPE, 1.93 ± 0.6 for mild BPE, 2.42 ± 0.5 for moderate BPE, and 1.45 ± 0.3 for marked BPE. There were significant (P < 0.001) moderate to strong correlations among BPU, BPE, and FGT. BPU directly correlated with both BPE and FGT on MRI. Patient age showed a moderate to strong indirect correlation with all 3 imaging-derived tissue biomarkers. The coefficient of variation for quantitative BPU measurements with SUV_max was 5.6%, indicating a high reproducibility. Interinterpreter and intrainterpreter agreement for BPE and FGT was almost perfect, with a κ-value of 0.860 and 0.822, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study demonstrate that BPU varied among patients. BPU directly correlated with both BPE and FGT on MRI, and BPU measurements were highly reproducible. Patient age showed a strong inverse correlation with all 3 imaging-derived tissue biomarkers. These findings indicate that BPU may serve as a sensitive imaging biomarker for breast cancer prediction, prognosis, and risk assessment.

Comparative analysis of imaging sensitivity of positron emission mammography and whole-body PET in relation to tumor size

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission mammography (PEM) consists of a dedicated PET scanner for breast imaging with a higher spatial resolution than whole-body PET (WBPET) scanners. This study compared the imaging sensitivity of PEM with WBPET in relation to tumor size.

METHODS

Fifty-four Japanese women younger than 50 years with histologically confirmed breast lesions were retrospectively enrolled. Positron emission mammography and WBPET were conducted on the same day. Positron emission mammography and WBPET images were blindly evaluated and compared with histopathology. Tumors were classified into 3 groups based on size as follows: group 1, 1 cm or smaller; group 2, 1 to 2 cm; and group 3, larger than 2 cm. The sensitivities of PEM and WBPET were compared in overall subjects and in each size group.

RESULTS

In visual analysis, the overall imaging sensitivity was 78.6% (33/42) for PEM and 47.6% (20/42) for WBPET. The overall sensitivity of PEM was significantly higher than that of WBPET (P < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between PEM and WBPET were larger in smaller tumors: group 1 (66.7% vs 13.3%), group 2 (63.4% vs 36.4%), and group 3 (100.0% vs 87.5%). The sensitivity of PEM was significantly higher than that of WBPET in group 1 (P = 0.008); however, no significant differences were seen in group 2 (P = 0.500) or group 3 (P = 0.250). Overall, the imaging specificity of PEM and WEBPET was 90.6% (60/66) and 93.9% (62/66), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The imaging sensitivity of PEM was higher than that of WBPET in Japanese women younger than 50 years. Positron emission mammography showed significant sensitivity in tumors smaller than 1 cm, which has been a weak point for WBPET.

Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of background parenchymal uptake categories observed at screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to examine the association of background parenchymal uptake with mammographic density and other clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adjunct MBI screening was performed for women with dense breasts on previous mammograms. Two radiologists reviewed images from the MBI examinations and subjectively categorized background parenchymal uptake into four groups: photopenic, minimal-mild, moderate, or marked. Women with breast implants or a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. The association between background parenchymal uptake categories and patient characteristics was examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS. In 1149 eligible participants, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 252 (22%), minimal-mild in 728 (63%), and moderate or marked in 169 (15%). The distribution of categories differed across BI-RADS density categories (p < 0.0001). In 164 participants with extremely dense breasts, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 72 (44%), minimal-mild in 55 (34%), and moderate or marked in 37 (22%). The moderate-marked group was younger on average, more likely to be premenopausal or perimenopausal, and more likely to be using postmenopausal hormone therapy than the photopenic or minimal-mild groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Among women with similar-appearing mammographic density, background parenchymal uptake ranged from photopenic to marked. Background parenchymal uptake was associated with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy but not with premenopausal hormonal contraceptives, phase of menstrual cycle, or Gail model 5-year risk of breast cancer. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the underlying cause of background parenchymal uptake and determine its utility in predicting subsequent risk of breast cancer.