Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance protocol: Value of high-resolution temporal dynamic sequence to improve lesion characterization

Clinical role of abbreviated and ultrafast MRI in breast imaging

Current breast cancer screening relies on mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound. In select populations, breast MRI is also of great utility. However, multiple factors limit widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Efforts have been made to increase the availability of breast MRI for screening, in large part due to the increased cancer detection rate of breast MRI compared to mammography. Techniques include shortening standard breast MRI protocols with the potential for accommodating MRI screening in a higher number of patients. This review will explain the role of abbreviated breast MRI and ultrafast breast MRI in breast imaging, and detail how these approaches differ from standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. In addition, limitations and advantages of these techniques will also be discussed.

Abbreviated Breast MRI: State of the Art

Abbreviated MRI is an umbrella term, defined as a focused MRI examination tailored to answer a single specific clinical question. For abbreviated breast MRI, this question is: "Is there evidence of breast cancer?" Abbreviated MRI of the breast makes maximum use of the fact that the kinetics of breast cancers and of benign tissue differ most in the very early postcontrast phase; therefore, abbreviated breast MRI focuses on this period. The different published approaches to abbreviated MRI include the following three subtypes: (a) short protocols, consisting of a precontrast and either a single postcontrast acquisition (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST]) or a time-resolved series of postcontrast acquisitions with lower spatial resolution (ultrafast [UF]), obtained during the early postcontrast phase immediately after contrast agent injection; (b) abridged protocols, consisting of FAST or UF acquisitions plus selected additional pulse sequences; and (c) noncontrast protocols, where diffusion-weighted imaging replaces the contrast information. Abbreviated MRI was proposed to increase tolerability of and access to breast MRI as a screening tool. But its widening application now includes follow-up after breast cancer and even diagnostic assessment. This review defines the three subtypes of abbreviated MRI, highlighting the differences between the protocols and their clinical implications and summarizing the respective evidence on diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.

Comparing the diagnostic accuracy, reading time, and inter-rater agreement of breast MRI abbreviated and full protocols: a multi-reader study

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies have shown that abbreviated protocol magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) has similar diagnostic accuracy as the full protocol (Full MRI).

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy, reading time, and inter-rater agreement of AB-MRI to Full MRI among women without known increased familial risk of breast cancer or prior biopsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 395 MRI examinations were included in this study. Three readers were blinded to all patient information. The AB-MRI and Full MRI were read separately and in a different random order for each of the readers. Scores 1-2 were considered test negative while scores 3-5 were test positive. A positive reference test was the diagnosis of malignancy; a negative reference test was the absence of a diagnosis of breast cancer within a two-year follow-up. We used a generalized estimating equations approach to compare sensitivity and specificity between the two protocols. We used t-tests to compare the average reading time and Krippendorff's alpha to compare inter-rater agreement.

RESULTS

MRI examinations of 395 women (median age=56 years) were evaluated. For AB-MRI and Full MRI, respectively, the sensitivity was 93.0% (95% CI=90.6-95.0) vs. 92.0% (95% CI=89.4-94.1), the specificity was 91.7% (95% CI=90.3-92.9) vs. 94.3% (95% CI=93.2-95.3), average reading time was 67 vs. 126 s, and the inter-rater agreement 0.79 vs. 0.83. The difference in sensitivity was not statistically significant (P=0.840), but the difference in specificity was significant (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

AB-MRI has similar sensitivity, but somewhat lower specificity. The average reading time for the abbreviated protocol is lower, as is inter-rater agreement.

Ultrafast DCE-MRI for discriminating pregnancy-associated breast cancer lesions from lactation related background parenchymal enhancement

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of ultrafast dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in visualization and quantitative characterization of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and its differentiation from background-parenchymal-enhancement (BPE) among lactating patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine lactating participants, including 10 PABC patients and 19 healthy controls, were scanned on 3-T MRI using a conventional DCE protocol interleaved with a golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) ultrafast sequence for the initial phase. The timing of the visualization of PABC lesions was compared to lactational BPE. Contrast-noise ratio (CNR) was compared between the ultrafast and conventional DCE sequences. The differences in each group's ultrafast-derived kinetic parameters including maximal slope (MS), time to enhancement (TTE), and area under the curve (AUC) were statistically examined using the Mann-Whitney test and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

On ultrafast MRI, breast cancer lesions enhanced earlier than BPE (p < 0.0001), enabling breast cancer visualization freed from lactation BPE. A higher CNR was found for ultrafast acquisitions vs. conventional DCE (p < 0.05). Significant differences in AUC, MS, and TTE values were found between the tumor and BPE (p < 0.05), with ROC-derived AUC of 0.86 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.07, and 0.68 ± 0.08, respectively. The BPE grades of the lactating PABC patients were reduced as compared with the healthy lactating controls (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Ultrafast DCE MRI allows BPE-free visualization of lesions, improved tumor conspicuity, and kinetic quantification of breast cancer during lactation. Implementation of this method may assist in the utilization of breast MRI for lactating patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ultrafast sequence appears to be superior to conventional DCE MRI in the challenging evaluation of the lactating breast. Thus, supporting its possible utilization in the setting of high-risk screening during lactation and the diagnostic workup of PABC.

KEY POINTS

• Differences in the enhancement slope of cancer relative to BPE allowed the optimal visualization of PABC lesions on mid-acquisitions of ultrafast DCE, in which the tumor enhanced prior to the background parenchyma. • The conspicuity of PABC lesions on top of the lactation-related BPE was increased using an ultrafast sequence as compared with conventional DCE MRI. • Ultrafast-derived maps provided further characterization and parametric contrast between PABC lesions and lactation-related BPE.

Abbreviated Breast MRI: Our Two-Year Initial Experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and present our two-year experience with abbreviated breast MRI at our academic institution as a screening tool to identify primary breast cancers.

METHODS

Employing eight specialty trained breast radiologists, studies were interpreted using the BI-RADS MRI lexicon in this IRB-approved retrospective study. The protocol utilized T1-weighted, fat-saturated, pre- and post-contrast, short  T1 inversion recovery images, and was completed within 10 minutes. Abbreviated breast MRI was offered to asymptomatic women of all breast densities, whose ages ranged from 24 to 90 years. Statistical analysis was performed for comparative data utilizing estimated odds ratios.

RESULTS

Of 1338 patients that met inclusion criteria, 83% (1111/1338) were BI-RADS 1 or 2, 9.0% (121/1338) were BI-RADS 3, and 8% (106/1338) were categorized as either BI-RADS 4 or 5 with recommended biopsy. Biopsy of BI-RADS 4 and 5 categorized patients yielded 15 cancers for a positive predictive value (PPV) 2 of 14.2% and a PPV3 of 18.5%, with 76% (81/106) of patients undergoing the recommended biopsy. An additional cancer was detected in a BI-RADS 3 finding. All cancers detected were in women with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts. Therefore, 16 cancers were detected, yielding a cancer detection rate of 12.0 per 1000. Over the next 12 to 24 months, no interval cancers were detected.

CONCLUSION

Abbreviated breast MRI demonstrates a higher cancer detection rate compared with mammography only and may provide a supplemental screening method to detect breast cancers in patients with varying risk factors.

The effectiveness of an ultrafast breast MRI protocol in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of an ultrafast breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions were recruited between July 2020 to May 2021. A standard breast MRI was performed with the inclusion of the ultrafast protocol between the unenhanced sequence and the first contrast-enhanced sequence. Three radiologists performed image interpretation in consensus. Ultrafast kinetic parameters analysed included the maximum slope (MS), time to enhancement (TTE), and arteriovenous index (AVI). These parameters were compared using receiver operating characteristics with p-values of <0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Eighty-three histopathological proven lesions from 54 patients (mean age 53.87 years, SD 12.34, range 26-78 years) were analysed. Forty-one per cent (n=34) were benign and 59% (n=49) were malignant. All malignant and 38.2% (n=13) benign lesions were visualised on the ultrafast protocol. Of the malignant lesions, 77.6% (n=53) were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 18.4% (n=9) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The MS for malignant lesions (13.27%/s) were significantly larger than for benign (5.45%/s; p<0.0001). No significant differences were seen for TTE and AVI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MS, TTE, and AVI were 0.836, 0.647, and 0.684, respectively. Different types of invasive carcinoma had similar MS and TTE. The MS of high-grade DCIS was also similar to that of IDC. Lower MS values were observed for low-grade (5.3%/s) compared to high-grade DCIS (14.8%/s) but the results were not significant statistically.

CONCLUSION

The ultrafast protocol showed potential to discriminate between malignant and benign breast lesions with high accuracy using MS.

Time to enhancement of breast lesions and normal breast parenchyma in light of menopausal status and menstrual cycle for ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using compressed sensing

PURPOSE

To assess the dependency of the Time to enhancement (TTE) of breast lesions and normal breast parenchyma from menopausal status and menstrual cycle using ultrafast compressed sensing (CS) -accelerated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

METHODS

This institutional review board approved retrospective study included 89 breast cancers, 22 benign lesions and 131 normal breast parenchymal foci. A prototypical ultrafast DCE sequence obtained 30 phases with 2.9 s temporal resolution. Mean and median TTE of all breast cancers, benign lesions and normal breast parenchymal foci were assessed. we also assessed whether there were any differences in TTE regarding the menopausal status and menstrual cycle.

RESULTS

The TTE of breast cancer was significantly shorter than that of benign lesions and normal breast parenchymal foci in both the premenopausal status (5.8 vs. 8.7 and 8.7 s, respectively) (p = 0.0028 and < 0.0001, respectively) and postmenopausal status (5.8 vs. 11.6 and 11.6 s, respectively) (p < 0.0001 in both). The TTE of parenchymal foci in the premenopausal status was significantly shorter than that in the postmenopausal status (p = 0.0025). Although the TTE interval between cancer and parenchymal foci in premenopausal status is shorter than that in postmenopausal status, the AUCs in the pre- and postmenopausal status for differentiating breast cancer and parenchymal foci were comparable with using different cutoff TTE values. There were no differences in TTE regarding the menstrual cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

The TTE derived from ultrafast CS-accelerated DCE MRI was useful to differentiate breast cancer from benign lesions and normal breast parenchymal foci in both pre- and postmenopausal status.

Performance of abbreviated protocols versus unenhanced MRI in detecting occult breast lesions of mammography in patients with dense breasts

To assess the diagnostic ability of abbreviated protocols of MRI (AP-MRI) compared with unenhanced MRI (UE-MRI) in mammographically occult cancers in patients with dense breast tissue. The retrospective analysis consisted of 102 patients without positive findings on mammography who received preoperative MRI full diagnostic protocols (FDP) between January 2015 and December 2018. Two breast radiologists read the UE, AP, and FDP. The interpretation times were recorded. The comparisons of the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of each MRI protocol, and the sensitivity of these protocols in each subgroup of different size tumors used the Chi-square test. The paired sample t-test was used for evaluating the difference of reading time of the three protocols. Among 102 women, there were 68 cancers and two benign lesions in 64 patients and 38 patients had benign or negative findings. Both readers found the sensitivity and specificity of AP and UE-MRI were similar (p > 0.05), whereas compared with FDP, UE had lower sensitivity (Reader 1/Reader 2: p = 0.023, 0.004). For different lesion size groups, one of the readers found that AP and FDP had higher sensitivities than UE-MRI for detecting the lesions ≤ 10 mm in diameter (p = 0.041, p = 0.023). Compared with FDP, the average reading time of UE-MRI and AP was remarkably reduced (p < 0.001). AP-MRI had more advantages than UE-MRI to detect mammographically occult cancers, especially for breast tumors ≤ 10 mm in diameter.

MRI Screening of BRCA Mutation Carriers: Comparison of Standard Protocol and Abbreviated Protocols With and Without T2-Weighted Images

BACKGROUND. Increasing evidence supports the role of abbreviated MRI protocols for breast cancer detection. However, abbreviated protocols have been poorly studied in patients who are BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Furthermore, the need for T2-weighted sequences in abbreviated protocols remains controversial. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare, in the evaluation of patients with BRCA mutations, the diagnostic performance of a standard full breast MRI protocol with the performance of abbreviated protocols that included and did not include a T2-weighted sequence. METHODS. This retrospective study included 292 patients (mean age, 47.9 years) who were BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers who underwent 427 screening breast MRI examinations according to a standard full protocol who could be classified as having benign (n = 407) or malignant (n = 20) findings based on histopathology or imaging follow-up. Four readers independently assessed examinations in three separate sessions (theoretic abbreviated protocol, which included the first postcontrast acquisition; theoretic abbreviated protocol with addition of a T2-weighted sequence; and the standard full protocol) and assigned BI-RADS categories. Categories 3-5 were considered to represent positive examinations. Interreader agreement was assessed, and diagnostic performance was compared by use of pooled reader data. RESULTS. Interreader agreement on BI-RADS category, expressed as kappa values, was 0.55 for the standard, 0.45 for the abbreviated, and 0.57 for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols. Pooled sensitivity was 94% for the standard, 92% for the abbreviated, and 90% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (all p > .001). Pooled specificity was 80% for the standard, 71% for the abbreviated, and 83% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated plus T2-weighted compared with both standard and abbreviated). Pooled PPV was 19% for the standard, 14% for the abbreviated, and 20% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated compared with both standard and abbreviated). Pooled NPV was 100% for the standard, 99% for the abbreviated, and 99% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted (all p > .001) protocols. Pooled accuracy was 80% for the standard, 73% for the abbreviated, and 83% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated compared with both standard and abbreviated plus T2-weighted). CONCLUSION. The abbreviated protocol without T2-weighted imaging had suboptimal performance. However, addition of the T2-weighted sequence yielded comparable sensitivity and accuracy and a small increase in specificity compared with the full protocol. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support implementation of abbreviated MRI with T2-weighted imaging for breast cancer screening of patients with BRCA mutations.

A Concise Review on the Utilization of Abbreviated Protocol Breast MRI over Full Diagnostic Protocol in Breast Cancer Detection

Breast MRI possesses high sensitivity for detecting breast cancer among the current clinical modalities and is an indispensable imaging practice. Breast MRI comprises diffusion-weighted imaging, ultrafast, and T2 weighted and T1 weighted CE (contrast-enhanced) imaging that may be utilized for improving the characterization of the lesions. This multimodal evaluation of breast lesions enables outstanding discrimination between the malignant and benign and malignant lesions. The expanding indications of breast MRI confirm the far superiority of MRI in preoperative staging, especially in the estimation of tumour size and identifying tumour foci in the contralateral and ipsilateral breast. Recent studies depicted that experts can meritoriously utilize this tool for improving breast cancer surgery despite their existence of no significant long term outcomes. For managing the, directly and indirectly, associated screening cost, abbreviated protocols are found to be more beneficial. Further, in some of the patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast MRI is utilized for documenting response. It is therefore essential to realise that oncological screening must be easily available, cost-effective, and time-consuming. Earlier detection of this short sequence protocol leads to prior and early breast cancer disease in high risky female populations like women with dense breasts, prehistoric evidence, etc. This proper utilization of AP reduces unnecessary mastectomies. Hence, this review focused on the explorative information for strongly suggesting the benefits of AP breast MRI compared to full diagnostic protocol MRI.

Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances

The breast experiences substantial changes in morphology and function during pregnancy and lactation which affects its imaging properties and may reduce the visibility of a concurrent pathological process. The high incidence of benign gestational-related entities may further add complexity to the clinical and radiological evaluation of the breast during the period. Consequently, pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is often a delayed diagnosis and carries a poor prognosis. This state-of-the-art pictorial review illustrates how despite currently being underutilized, technical advances and new clinical evidence support the use of unenhanced breast MRI during pregnancy and both unenhanced and dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) during lactation, to serve as effective supplementary modalities in the diagnostic work-up of PABC.

Small lesion classification on abbreviated breast MRI: training can improve diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement for small lesion classification on abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) can be improved by training, and can achieve the level of full diagnostic protocol MRI (FDP-MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 1165 breast lesions (≤ 2 cm; 409 malignant and 756 benign) from 1165 MRI examinations for reading test. Twelve radiologists were assigned into a trained group and a non-trained group. They interpreted each AB-MRI twice, which was extracted from FDP-MRI. After the first read, the trained group received a structured training for AB-MRI interpretation while the non-trained group did not. FDP-MRIs were interpreted by the trained group after the second read. BI-RADS category for each lesion was compared to the standard of reference (histopathological examination or follow-up) to calculate diagnostic accuracy. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using multirater k analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement were compared between the trained and non-trained groups, between the first and second reads, and between AB-MRI and FDP-MRI.

RESULTS

After training, the diagnostic accuracy of AB-MRI increased from 77.6 to 84.4%, and inter-reader agreement improved from 0.410 to 0.579 (both p < 0.001), which were higher than those of the non-trained group (accuracy, 84.4% vs 78.0%; weighted k, 0.579 vs 0.461; both p < 0.001). The post-training accuracy and inter-reader agreement of AB-MRI were lower than those of FDP-MRI (accuracy, 84.4% vs 92.8%; weighted k, 0.579 vs 0.602; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Training can improve the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement for small lesion classification on AB-MRI; however, it remains inferior to those of FDP-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Training can improve the diagnostic performance for small breast lesions on AB-MRI. • Training can reduce inter-observer variation for breast lesion classification on AB-MRI, especially among junior radiologists. • The post-training diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of AB-MRI remained inferior to those of FDP-MRI.

Multifocality and Multicentrality in Breast Cancer: Comparison of the Efficiency of Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Group of Patients with Primarily Operable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The multifocality and multicentrality of breast cancer (MFMCC) are the significant aspects that determine a specialist's choice between applying breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or performing a mastectomy. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of mammography (MG), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women diagnosed with breast cancer before qualifying for surgical intervention to visualize other (additional) cancer foci.

METHODS

The study included 60 breast cancer cases out of 630 patients initially who underwent surgery due to breast cancer from January 2015 to April 2019. MG, CESM, and MRI were compared with each other in terms of the presence of MFMCC and assessed for compliance with the postoperative histopathological examination (HP).

RESULTS

Histopathological examination confirmed the presence of MFMCC in 33/60 (55%) patients. The sensitivity of MG in detecting MFMCC was 50%, and its specificity was 95.83%. For CESM, the sensitivity was 85.29%, and the specificity was 96.15%. For MRI, all the above-mentioned parameters were higher as follows: sensitivity-91.18%; specificity-92.31%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MFMCC, both CESM and MRI are highly sensitive in the detection of additional cancer foci. Both CESM and MRI change the extent of surgical intervention in every fourth patient.

Screening Breast MRI Primer: Indications, Current Protocols, and Emerging Techniques

Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer. Screening MRI is currently performed predominantly in patients at high risk for breast cancer, but it could be of benefit in patients at intermediate risk for breast cancer and patients with dense breasts. Decreasing scan time and image interpretation time could increase cost-effectiveness, making screening MRI accessible to a larger group of patients. Abbreviated breast MRI (Ab-MRI) reduces scan time by decreasing the number of sequences obtained, but as multiple delayed contrast enhanced sequences are not obtained, no kinetic information is available. Ultrafast techniques rapidly acquire multiple sequences during the first minute of gadolinium contrast injection and provide information about both lesion morphology and vascular kinetics. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a noncontrast MRI technique with the potential to detect mammographically occult cancers. This review article aims to discuss the current indications of breast MRI as a screening tool, examine the standard breast DCE-MRI technique, and explore alternate screening MRI protocols, including Ab-MRI, ultrafast MRI, and noncontrast diffusion-weighted MRI, which can decrease scan time and interpretation time.

A meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and a full diagnostic protocol in breast cancer

AIM

To undertake a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of abbreviated (ABB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and full diagnostic protocol MRI (FDP-MRI) in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through August 2019 for studies comparing the diagnostic performance of ABB-MRI and FDP-MRI in the breast. Studies were reviewed by two authors independently according to eligibility and exclusion criteria and split into two subgroups (screening population studies and studies using cohorts enriched with known cancers) to avoid bias. Quality assessment and bias for diagnostic accuracy was determined with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The diagnostic accuracy for each subgroup was pooled using a bivariate random effects model and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves produced. Sensitivities and specificities were compared using a paired t-test.

RESULTS

Five screening (62/2,588 cancers/patients) and eight enriched cohort (540/1,432 cancers/patients) studies were included in the meta-analysis. QUADAS-2 assessment showed a low risk of bias in most studies. The pooled sensitivity/specificity/area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for screening studies was 0.90/0.92/0.94 for ABB-MRI and 0.92/0.95/0.97 for FDP-MRI. The pooled sensitivity/specificity/AUC for enriched cohort studies was 0.93/0.83/0.94 for ABB-MRI and 0.93/0.84/0.95 for FDP-MRI. There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity using ABB-MRI or FDP-MRI (p=0.18 and 0.27, p=0.18 and 0.93, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performances of the ABB-MRI and FDP-MRI protocols used in either screening or enriched cohorts were comparable. There was a large variation in patient population, study methodology, and abbreviated protocols reported.

Abbreviated MR Imaging for Breast Cancer

Breast MR imaging is the most sensitive imaging method for the detection of breast cancer and detects more aggressive malignancies than mammography and ultrasound examination. Despite these advantages, breast MR imaging has low use rates for breast cancer screening. Abbreviated breast MR imaging, in which a limited number of breast imaging sequences are obtained, has been proposed as a way to solve cost and patient tolerance issues while preserving the high cancer detection rate of breast MR imaging. This review discusses abbreviated breast MR imaging, including protocols, multicenter clinical trial results, clinical workflow implementation challenges, and future directions.

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly used to study breast cancer for screening high-risk cases, pre-operative staging, and problem-solving because of its high sensitivity. However, its cost-effectiveness is still debated. Thus, the concept of abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) protocols was proposed as a possible solution for reducing MRI costs.

PURPOSE

: to investigate the role of the abbreviated MRI protocols in detecting and staging breast cancer.

METHODS

: a systematic search of the literature was carried out in the bibliographic databases: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Science Direct.

RESULTS

: forty-one articles were included, which described results of the assessment of fifty-three abbreviated protocols for screening, staging, recurrence assessing, and problem-solving or clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

: the use of ABB-MRI protocols allows reducing the acquisition and reading times, maintaining a high concordance with the final interpretation, in comparison to a complete protocol. However, larger prospective and multicentre trials are necessary to validate the performance in specific clinical environments.

The potential utility of abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) as a tool for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To synthesise evidence comparing abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (abMRI) to full-protocol MRI (fpMRI) in breast cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was undertaken in multiple databases. Cohort studies without enrichment, presenting accuracy data of abMRI in screening, for any level of risk (population, moderate, high risk) were included. Level of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analyses (bivariate random effects model) were performed for abMRI, with fpMRI and histology from fpMRI-positive cases as reference standard, and with follow-up to symptomatic detection added to the fpMRI. The review also covers evidence comparing abMRI with mammographic techniques.

RESULTS

The title and abstract review retrieved 23 articles. Five studies (six articles) were included (2,763 women, 3,251 screening rounds). GRADE assessment of the evidence was very low because the reference standard was interpreted with knowledge of the index test and biopsy was not obtained for all abMRI positives. The overall sensitivity for abMRI, with fpMRI (and histology for fpMRI positives) as reference standard, was 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85.5-98.2) and specificity as 94.6% (95% CI: 91.5-96.6). Three studies (1,450 women, 1,613 screening rounds) presented follow-up data, enabling comparison between abMRI and fpMRI. Sensitivities and specificities for abMRI did not differ significantly from those for fpMRI (p=0.83 and p=0.37, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A very low level of evidence suggests abMRI could be accurate for breast cancer screening. Research is required, with follow-up to interval cancer, to determine the effect its use could have on clinical outcome.

Abbreviated Breast MRI: Road to Clinical Implementation

Breast MRI offers high sensitivity for breast cancer detection, with preferential detection of high-grade invasive cancers when compared to mammography and ultrasound. Despite the clear benefits of breast MRI in cancer screening, its cost, patient tolerance, and low utilization remain key issues. Abbreviated breast MRI, in which only a select number of sequences and postcontrast imaging are acquired, exploits the high sensitivity of breast MRI while reducing table time and reading time to maximize availability, patient tolerance, and accessibility. Worldwide studies of varying patient populations have demonstrated that the comparable diagnostic accuracy of abbreviated breast MRI is comparable to a full diagnostic protocol, highlighting the emerging role of abbreviated MRI screening in patients with an intermediate and high lifetime risk of breast cancer. The purpose of this review is to summarize the background and current literature relating to abbreviated MRI, highlight various protocols utilized in current multicenter clinical trials, describe workflow and clinical implementation issues, and discuss the future of abbreviated protocols, including advanced MRI techniques.

Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 1): pros and cons of MRI screening

Screening plays an important role in women with a high risk of breast cancer. Given this population's high incidence of breast cancer and younger age of onset compared to the general population, it is recommended that screening starts earlier. There is ample evidence that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive diagnostic tool, and American and the European guidelines both recommend annual MRI screening (with supplementary annual mammography) as the optimum screening modality. Nevertheless, the current guidelines do not totally agree about the recommendations for MRI screening in some subgroups of patients. The first part of this article on screening in women with increased risk of breast cancer reviews the literature to explain and evaluate the advantages of MRI screening compared to screening with mammography alone: increased detection of smaller cancers with less associated lymph node involvement and a reduction in the rate of interval cancers, which can have an impact on survival and mortality (with comparable effects to other preventative measures). At the same time, however, we would like to reflect on the drawbacks of MRI screening that affect its applicability.

Time-to-enhancement at ultrafast breast DCE-MRI: potential imaging biomarker of tumour aggressiveness

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted in order to investigate whether there is a correlation between the time-to-enhancement (TTE) in ultrafast MRI and histopathological characteristics of breast cancers.

METHODS

Between January and August 2017, 274 consecutive breast cancer patients (mean age, 53.5 years; range, 25-80 years) who underwent ultrafast MRI and subsequent surgery were included for analysis. Ultrafast MRI scans were acquired using TWIST-VIBE or 4D TRAK-3D TFE sequences. TTE and maximum slope (MS) were derived from the ultrafast MRI. The repeated measures ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were performed to compare the median TTE, MS and SER according to histologic type, histologic grade, ER/PR/HER2 positivity, level of Ki-67 and tumour subtype. For TTE calculation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate interobserver variability.

RESULTS

The median TTE of invasive cancers was shorter than that of in situ cancers (p < 0.001). In invasive cancers, large tumours showed shorter TTE than small tumours (p = 0.001). High histologic/nuclear grade cancers had shorter TTE than low to intermediate grade cancers (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). HER2-positive cancers showed shorter TTE than HER2-negative cancers (p = 0.001). The median TTE of cancers with high Ki-67 was shorter than that of cancers with low Ki-67 (p < 0.001). ICC between two readers showed moderate agreement (0.516). No difference was found in the median MS or SER values according to the clinicopathologic features.

CONCLUSIONS

The median TTE of breast cancer in ultrafast MRI was shorter in invasive or aggressive tumours than in in situ cancer or less aggressive tumours, respectively.

KEY POINTS

• Invasive breast tumours show a shorter TTE in ultrafast DCE-MRI than in situ cancers. • A shorter TTE in ultrafast DCE-MRI is associated with breast tumours of a large size, high histologic or nuclear grade, PR negativity, HER2 positivity and high Ki-67 level.

The additional utility of ultrafast MRI on conventional DCE-MRI in evaluating preoperative MRI of breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the additional use of ultrafast MRI can improve the diagnostic performance of conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in evaluating MRI-detected lesions in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 101 consecutive breast cancer patients with 202 breast lesions (62 benign and 140 malignant) who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI with ultrafast imaging (9 image sets with 6.5-second temporal resolution). Two reviewers assessed the BI-RADS categories of breast lesions using conventional DCE-MRI and assessed the following parameters using the ultrafast MRI: initial enhancement phase, maximum relative enhancement, slope, and maximum slope (slope_max) on the kinetic curve. Interobserver agreement was analyzed between the two reviewers. The ultrafast MRI parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors, and cut-off values were determined. For 97 additional MRI-detected lesions, the BI-RADS category was re-assessed using cut-off values, and the diagnostic performance was compared between the conventional DCE-MRI and the combined conventional and ultrafast DCE-MRI.

RESULTS

All ultrafast MRI parameters differed significantly between malignant and benign tumors (p < 0.001). Initial enhancement phase by reviewer and slope_max were the top two parameters showing significant differences between benign and malignant tumors with high reliability. With the use of cut-off values for initial enhancement phase (≤phase 2) and slope_max (>9.8%/sec), the specificity of conventional DCE-MRI was significantly increased (29.4% vs 64.7%, p < 0.001) without significant loss of sensitivity (100% vs 88.2%, p = 0.157) in evaluating masses.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional use of ultrafast MRI can improve the specificity of conventional DCE-MRI when evaluating MRI-detected masses in breast cancer patients.

Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening: Concept, Early Results, and Considerations

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly utilized, especially in screening for high-risk cases, because of its high sensitivity and superior ability to detect cancers as compared with mammography and ultrasound. Several limitations such as higher cost, longer examination time, longer interpretation time, and low availability have hindered the wider application of MRI, especially for screening of average-risk women. To overcome some of these limitations and increase access to MRI screening, an abbreviated breast MRI protocol has been introduced. Abbreviated breast MRI is becoming popular and challenges the status quo. This review aims to present an overview of abbreviated MRI, discuss the current findings, and introduce ongoing prospective trials.

Breast MRI: Is Faster Better?

OBJECTIVE. Fast breast MRI protocols have the same sensitivity as conventional protocols, but their specificity is variable and can be inadequate. An ultrafast sequence provides early enhancement of lesion characteristics that optimize the characterization of the fast protocol, increasing positive predictive values without increasing time. CONCLUSION. These new abbreviated protocols could constitute a viable screening tool both for women at high risk of breast cancer and for those at intermediate risk with high breast density.

Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Breast Cancer Screening: Rationale, Concept, and Transfer to Clinical Practice

Given the increasing understanding of cancer as a heterogeneous group of diseases, detection methods should offer a sensitivity profile that ensures perfect sensitivity for biologically important cancers while screening out self-limiting pseudocancers. However, mammographic screening is biased toward detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and slowly growing cancers-and thus frequently fails to detect biologically aggressive cancers. This explains the persistently high rates of interval cancers and high rates of breast cancer mortality observed in spite of decades of mammographic screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in contrast, has a sensitivity profile that matches clinical needs. Conventional MRI is not suitable for population-wide screening due to high cost, limited tolerability, and lack of availability. We introduced abbreviated MRI in 2014. Abbreviated MRI will change the way MRI is used in clinical medicine. This article describes the rationale to use MRI in general, and abbreviated MRI in particular, for breast cancer screening.

Diagnostic performance of maximum slope: A kinetic parameter obtained from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC)

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of the kinetic parameter maximum slope (MS) in breast lesions obtained by ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) of the contrast wash-in period with that of the washout index (WI) derived from standard DCE MRI and that of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 138 contrast enhanced lesions (90 malignant, 48 benign) were evaluated. Ultrafast DCE MRI images were acquired using a k-space-weighted image contrast (KWIC), obtained 0-1 min after gadolinium injection (3.75 s/frame; 16 frames) and followed by standard DCE MRI (60 s/frame, 3 frames). MS was calculated for the KWIC time series as percentage relative enhancement per second (%/s). As a semi-quantitative parameter for the standard DCE MRI time series, WI was evaluated using the change in signal intensity between early and delayed phases. The diagnostic performance (malignant/benign differentiation) of MS, WI, and BI-RADS category was compared by ROC analysis using the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The AUC of MS was as good as that of WI (0.81 vs. 0.79, respectively; P = 0.81), yet inferior to the BI-RADS category (0.81 vs. 0.96, respectively; <0.001). MS tended to have higher sensitivity (91.1% [82/90]) compared with WI (87.8% [79/90]) with same specificity (62.5% [30/48]).

CONCLUSIONS

MS obtained by ultrafast DCE MRI of the breast is a promising kinetic parameter in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions with decreased scanning time.

[Systematic second opinion review of outside imaging in breast cancer diagnosis: An added value]

INTRODUCTION

The systematic second opinion review in cancer centers after breast cancer detection is currently under development. The purposes were the evaluation of review's consequences, in particularly of the axillary staging and the evolution of the delays.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who consulted a clinician at Cancer Center of Lorraine in Nancy from January 1st, 2016 to December 31th, 2016. We analyzed from their medical charts: the outside exams, the initial therapeutic plan, the second opinion review, the additional exams, the multidisciplinary consultation conclusions, the first treatment, the multidisciplinary consultation after surgery.

RESULTS

In all, 251 patients were analyzed. Second opinion review discrepancies were seen in 72.5%. As a result, 43.4% of all patients had new breast-axillary biopsies. New malignancies lesions were identified in 19.9% of patients. Modifications in therapeutic plan were recommended in 19.9% of patients (including patients with and without new malignancies lesions diagnosed). Before a second opinion review, 9.8% of axillary ultrasound lead to a positive fine-needle biopsy. The additional exams identified 9.6% additional lesions. After a positive sentinel lymph node excision biopsy, the multidisciplinary consultation recommended a revision surgery of axillary lymph node dissection for 27% of patients with axillary ultrasound performed in our cancer center, and for 70% of patients without ultrasound (P=0.023).

DISCUSSION

The systematic second opinion at cancer center allows the detection of new malignancies lesions and significant modifications in the therapeutic plan. A systematic evaluation of axillary ultrasound in cancer center could be considered.

Protocole d’IRM abrégée pour le diagnostic et le dépistage du cancer du sein

Le cancer du sein est le premier cancer féminin en France, et sa détection précoce est indispensable. L’IRM mammaire est un élément de choix dans son diagnostic mais présente des coûts directs et indirects élevés, notamment du fait de sa durée qui ralentit son utilisation plus large. Compte tenu de ses éléments, l’utilisation d’un protocole abrégé se développe pour pallier ces inconvénients. Les premières données de la littérature tendent à penser que cet examen plus rapide permet également une durée d’interprétation plus courte. De plus, la sensibilité et la spécificité de l’examen ne sont pas inférieures à celles du protocole complet. Cet article explique ce nouveau concept et son intérêt, le compare au protocole complet et évoque les perspectives futures et notamment à l’adjonction de séquences à haute résolution temporelle.

Summarizing the 4D image stack of ultrafast dynamic contrast enhancement MRI of breast cancer in 3D using color intensity projections

BACKGROUND

Each ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI sequence for breast cancer generates thousands of images in a 4D stack that need to be reviewed by a radiologist.

PURPOSE

To assess whether color intensity projections (CIP) effectively summarizes-using only the time of arrival (ToA) and amount of signal enhancement (AoE) of the contrast agent-the thousands of ultrafast images.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective cohort clinical trial.

SUBJECTS

The study included 89 patients who had been scanned with an MRI beast protocol, of which 26 had breast cancer and 63 did not.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

The 115-second ultrafast DCE sequence at 3T acquired 19 consecutive frames every 4.26 seconds with 152 slices per frame, yielding a 4D stack with 2888 2D images for each of water and fat.

ASSESSMENT

For each slice of the water 4D stack a single CIP image was generated that encoded the ToA in the hue (red, orange, yellow, green, cyan, blue) and AoE in the brightness. Each of three experienced radiologists assigned a Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) score for each patient, first using only the CIP images, and subsequently using both CIP and the full 4D stack.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The one-sided Fisher's exact test was used to determine statistical significance of both the sensitivity and specificity between the CIP alone and the CIP plus 4D stack.

RESULTS

All malignancies were detected using only CIP by at least one of the radiologists. The CIP and CIP+4D sensitivities for reader 1 were 96% and 96% (P = 0.57), specificities were 59% and 65% (P = 0.29). For reader 2, the values were 96% and 100% (P = 0.51) with 62% and 71% (P = 0.17). For reader 3 the values were 92% and 96% (P = 0.50) with 51% and 62% (P = 0.07).

DATA CONCLUSION

With a 95% sensitivity, CIP provides an effective summary of ultrafast DCE images of breast cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1391-1399.

Abbreviated MRI of the Breast: Does It Provide Value?

MRI of the breast is the most sensitive test for breast cancer detection and outperforms conventional imaging with mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, or ultrasound. However, the long scan time and relatively high costs limit its widespread use. Hence, it is currently only routinely implemented in the screening of women at an increased risk of breast cancer. To overcome these limitations, abbreviated dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI protocols have been introduced that substantially shorten image acquisition and interpretation time while maintaining a high diagnostic accuracy. Efforts to develop abbreviated MRI protocols reflect the increasing scrutiny of the disproportionate contribution of radiology to the rising overall healthcare expenditures. Healthcare policy makers are now focusing on curbing the use of advanced imaging examinations such as MRI while continuing to promote the quality and appropriateness of imaging. An important cornerstone of value‐based healthcare defines value as the patient's outcome over costs. Therefore, the concept of a fast, abbreviated MRI exam is very appealing, given its high diagnostic accuracy coupled with the possibility of a marked reduction in the cost of an MRI examination. Given recent concerns about gadolinium‐based contrast agents, unenhanced MRI techniques such as diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) are also being investigated for breast cancer diagnosis. Although further larger prospective studies, standardized imaging protocol, and reproducibility studies are necessary, initial results with abbreviated MRI protocols suggest that it seems feasible to offer screening breast DCE‐MRI to a broader population. This article aims to give an overview of abbreviated and fast breast MRI protocols, their utility for breast cancer detection, and their emerging role in the new value‐based healthcare paradigm that has replaced the fee‐for‐service model.

Level of Evidence: 1

Technical Efficacy: Stage 2

J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e85–e100.